ML13329A140
| ML13329A140 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre |
| Issue date: | 12/28/1989 |
| From: | Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Ray H SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13329A141 | List: |
| References | |
| IEIN-88-043, IEIN-88-43, NUDOCS 9001180153 | |
| Download: ML13329A140 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000206/1989034
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
1450 MARIA LANE, SUITE 210
WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596
DEC 2 8 1989
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362
Southern California Edison Company
Irvine Operations Center
23 Parker Street
Irvine, California 92718
Attention: Mr. Harold B. Ray, Vice President
Nuclear Engineering, Safety, and Licensing
Gentlemen:
This refers to the Management Meeting on November 29, 1989 during which we
discussed issues related to the failure of an Automatic Switch Company (ASCO)
solenoid on August 23, 1989 and recent operator performance problems. In
addition, you provided a status on enhancements to the Emergency Preparedness
and Root Cause Assessment Programs, engineering program improvements, the
Design Basis Documentation (DBD) review, and the activities of Nuclear
Oversight Organizations. The subjects discussed during the meeting are
described in the enclosed Meeting Report for activities authorized by NRC
License Nos.
A copy of the agenda for this
meeting (transmitted to you by our letter dated November 22, 1989) is
enclosed.
With regard to the failure of the ASCO solenoid valve for CV-304, as pre
viously discussed in NRC Inspection Report No. 50-206/89-31, we are concerned
that sufficient information was available to have prevented the failure of
CV-304 and that appropriate information inputs were not made to the Control
of Problem Equipment (COPE) list. The COPE program appears to have been the
feature of your administrative controls which could most likely have
prevented the use of this problem equipment.
Weaknesses in your corrective
action program also appear to have contributed to the failure of CV-304.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosure
will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased
to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
Regional Adminis
tor
Enclosures: Management Meeting Report
Nos. 50-206/89-34, 50-361/89-34, and 50-362/89-34
F-DIR
PDCF
-2
cc w/Enclosure:
D. J. Fogarty, Executive Vice President
H. B. Bridenbecker, Vice President and Site Manager (San Clemente)
H. E. Morgan, Station Manager (San Clemente)
State of California
-2
cc w/Enclosure:
D. J. Fogarty, Executive Vice President
H. B. Bridenbecker, Vice President and Site Manager (San Clemente)
H. E. Morgan, Station Manager (San Clemente)
State of California
bcc w/copy of enclosure:
Docket File
Project Inspector
Resident Inspector
G. Cook
B. Faulkenberry
J. Martin
A. Johnson
P. Johnson
R. Nease, NRR
G. Knighton, NRR
bcc w/o enclosure:
M. Smith
N. Western
J. Zollicoffer
R
dw 1l
P
DKirsch
hafee
JMa~t n
.
9
012
12/2&89
12/FS/ 9
12/ 6/89
12/gy/89
REQUEST COPY
I
RDST COPY
UEST COPY J
EST COPY J
EST
PY ]
YES
/
NO
] (ES)/
NO
YES / NO
Y
ES /
NO
1
ES J
NO
N
D
TO PDR J
(ES /
NO
]
0II
Enclosure 1
MANAGEMENT MEETING
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
Region V Office, Walnut Creek, California
November 29, 1989
AGENDA
1. Opening Remarks, Purpose of Meeting -- J. B. Martin, Regional
Administrator, and H. B. Ray, Vice President
2. NRC Discussion items
a. Failure of ASCO Solenoid Valve CV-304
-
Inadequate Corrective Actions (In Response to Previous Failures
and NRC Information Notice No. 88-43)
-
Technical Specifications Requirements
b. Recent Operational Performance
-
Review of Recent Events and Experiences
-
SCE Discussion of Causal Factors and Corrective Actions
3. Presentations by Southern California Edison
a. Emergency Preparedness Program
-
Classification of Events
-
Interface between Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) and
Technical Support Center (TSC)
b. Status of Root Cause Assessment Program
c. Update on Engineering Improvements and SONGS Design Basis
Documentation (DBD) Review
d. Update on Activities of Nuclear Oversight Organizations
4. Closing remarks