ML13323B281
| ML13323B281 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 07/24/1987 |
| From: | Chaffee A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Baskin K SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13323B282 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8708100404 | |
| Download: ML13323B281 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000206/1987010
Text
-JUL 24 1987
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362
Southern California Edison Company
P. 0. Box 800
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue
Rosemead, California 92770
Attention:
Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin, Vice President
Nuclear Engineering Safety and Licensing
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine inspection conducted by Messrs. F. R. Huey, J. E.
Tatum, and A. L. Hon of this office during the period of April 4, 1987 through
May 23, 1987 of activities authorized by NRC License Nos. DPR-13, NPF-10 and
NPF-15 and to the discussion of our findings held by the inspectors with Mr.
H. B. Ray and other members of the Southern California Edison (SCE) staff at
the conclusion of the inspection.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection
report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective
examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with
personnel, and observations by the inspectors.
Paragraph 8.b the enclosed inspection report describes several examples of
licensee event reports (LERs) which do not appear to thoroughly or properly
address all significant aspects of the specific events. In some instances, it
may be that SCE did take appropriate actions to properly address all
significant aspects, although these actions were not adequately described in
the LER. To this extent, in your response to this memorandum, please identify
in which instances you conclude that additional evaluation or actions were
warranted as opposed to those instances in which only the reporting was
deficient. Also, please identify what actions are being taken to supplement
these LERs and ensure that future LERs properly reflect the SCE commitment to
thorough root cause evaluation.
Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that certain of-your
activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as set
forth in the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A.
Your response to this Notice is to be submitted in .accordance with the
provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 as stated in Appendix A, Notice of Violation.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter, the enclosure, and
your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
8708100404 870724
PDR ADOCK 05000206
0
JUL 24 1987
The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad to
discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
on!(
nod
A. E. Chaffee, Acting Chief
Reactor Projects Branch
Enclosures:
.2. Inspection Reports:
Nos. 50-206/87-10
50-361/87-09
50-362/87-10
cc w/enclosures:
D. J. Fogarty, Executive Vice President
H. B. Ray, Vice President (San Clemente)
H. E. Morgan, Station Manager (San Clemente)
State of California
bcc w/enclosures:
RSB/Document Control Desk (RIDS) (IE01)
Project Inspector
Resident Inspector
G. Cook
B. Faulkenberry
J. Martin
A
p
docket file
/ /
bcc w/o enclosure 2:
M. Smith
LFMB
REGION LVdot
FHuey
,
JTatum
P
on
AChaffee
7/Ry8TV
7/038
7
/87
7A
/yb
ST COPY ] REQUEST COPY
EST CO COP
COPY
REQUEST COPY I
ES/
NO
]4VES)IN/
NO
fYES t NOP J]YES /
NO]
SEN
0 PDR ]
YES!
NO]