ML13323B094
| ML13323B094 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 02/19/1986 |
| From: | Zech G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Baskin K SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13323B096 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-42516, NUDOCS 8602210131 | |
| Download: ML13323B094 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000206/1985030
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
February 19, 1986
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361,
and 50-362
Southern California Edison Company
ATTN: Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin, Vice President
Nuclear Engineering, Safety & Licensing
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue
Post Office Box 800
Rosemead, California 91770
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
INSPECTION NOS.50-20V!!.
50-361/85-29; and 50-362/85-28
Enclosed is the report of the team inspection conducted by Mr. R. C. Wilson
and other NRC representatives on September 23 to 27, 1985, at the San Onofre
Nuclear Generating Station of activities authorized by NRC License Nos.
DPR-13, NPF-10, and NPF-15. The team's findings were discussed with you and
members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The inspection
reviewed your implementation of a program as required by 10 CFR 50.49 for
establishing and maintaining the qualification of electric equipment within
the scope of 10 CFR 50.49. The inspection also included evaluation of your
actions concerning EQ-related operating license conditions for Units 2 and 3.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of examinations of selected
procedures and records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the
inspectors.
The inspection determined that you have implemented a program to meet the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.49 as well as the EQ-related Unit 2 and 3 license
conditions. Seven deficiencies in your program implementation, of which three
involve multiple units, are summarized in Appendix A and are classified as
Potential Enforcement/Unresolved Items and will be referred to the NRC
Region V office for further action. Six of the Potential Enforcement/Unresolved
Items represent failures to fully document the qualification of the following
types of equipment:
Galite cable, Rockbestos Firewall EP cable, Target Rock
solenoid valve, Honeywell E/P transducer, Rockbestos Firewall III cable, and
ASCO solenoid valve. The seventh involves a procedural failure to specify
procurement of upgraded replacement equipment. Six additional concerns are
classified as Open Items, and a future NRC inspection will review your actions
concerning them. Details of all the deficiencies and concerns are discussed in
the enclosed inspection report.
8602210131 860219
ADOCK 05000206
G
Southern California Edison
- 2 -
February 19,.1986
Company
Your corrective actions regarding the identified deficiencies and concerns
should not be delayed pending either a future NRC inspection or further action
by the NRC Region V Office.
We are available to discuss any questions you have concerning this
inspection.
Sincerely,
Ga
.
Zech, Chief
Vendor Program Branch
Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor
and Technical Training Center Programs
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Enclosure:
Inspection Report Nos. 50-206/85-30
50-361/85-29
50-362/85-28
APPENDIX A
Potential Enforcement/Unresolved Items
As a result of the special equipment qualification inspection on September 23
to 27, 1985, the following items have been referred to NRC Region V as
Potential Enforcement/Unresolved Items (paragraph references are to be
detailed portions of the inspection report).
1. Contrary to paragraphs (j) and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49, sections 5.1 and
5.2.2 of the DOR Guidelines, and section 5.0 of NUREG 0588 Cat. II,
Southern California Edison Company (SCE) did not adequately demonstrate
and/or document qualification of Galite thermocouple extension cable.
(Paragraph 4.E.(1), Items 50-206/85-30-1; 50-361/85-29-1; 50-362/85-28-1.)
2. Contrary to paragraph (f) of 10 CFR 50.49, SCE did not adequately
demonstrate and/or document qualification of Rockbestos Firewall EP
cable.
(Paragraph 4.E.(2), Item 50-206/85-30-2.)
3.
Contrary to paragraphs (j) and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49 and section 7.0 of the
DOR Guidelines, SCE did not adequately demonstrate and/or document
qualification of a Target Rock solenoid valve. (Paragraph 4.E.(3), Item
50-206/85-30-3.)
4. Contrary to paragraphs (j) and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49 and section 5.1 of the
DOR Guidelines, SCE did not adequately demonstrate and/or document
qualification of a Honeywell E/P transducer. (Paragraph 4.E.(4), Item
50-206/85-30-4.)
5. Contrary to paragraphs (f), (j), and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49 and sections
2.1(1) and 2.7(7) of NUREG 0588 Cat. II, SCE did not adequately
demonstrate and/or document qualification of Rockbestos Firewall III
cable.
(Paragraph 4.E.(5), Item 50-361/85-29-2; 50-362/85-28-2.)
6. Contrary to paragraphs (j) and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49 and section 7.0 of the
DOR Guidelines, SCE did not adequately demonstrate and/or document
qualification of an ASCO solenoid valve.
(Paragraph 4.E.(6), Item
50-206/85-30-5.)
7. Contrary to paragraph (1) of 10 CFR 50.49, SCE's procurement procedures
did not specify that replacement equipment must be qualified to 10 CFR
50.49 unless there are sound reasons to the contrary. (Paragraph 4.A,
Item 50-206/85-30-6; 50-361/85-29-3; 50-362/85-28-3.)