ML13323A651
| ML13323A651 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 03/06/1980 |
| From: | Norderhaug L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Papay L SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003260033 | |
| Download: ML13323A651 (1) | |
See also: IR 05000206/1980001
Text
- k REc~jYW
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
1990 N. CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD
SUITE 202, WALNUT CREEK PLAZA
WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596
IAR :
1980
Docket No. 50-206
Dr. L. T. Papay, Vice President
Advanced Engineering
Southern California Edison Company
P. 0. Box 800
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue
Rosemead, California
91770
Dear Dr. Papay:
This is in response to the unresolved issue we raised during our physical
protection ins
-1 on January 7-11, 1980 (Reference:
Inspec
tion Report N 50-206/80-01I E-V-357) Page 5, Paragraph 12).
Our headquarters, after reviewing this matter reaffirms that it is the li
censee's responsibility to maintain current authorization lists for employ
ees requiring frequent access. Where no key-card system exists, the "reason
.for
entry log" remains a separate requifement to be satisfied upon each en
try. With the establishment and use of a key-card system, however, the
determination of need for access can be made for a specific period, not
exceeding 31 days.
Separate validation of need for each access would be desirable from a secur
ity point of view, however,,'it is not operationally practical. It follows
that manual recording of "reason for entry" for each entry would be unnecessary.
Our headquarters states that your practice at SONGS-1 relative to document
ing the "reason for entry", are consistent with the intent of the rule and
your security plan.
L. R. Norderhaug
Chief, Safeguards Branch
cc:
J. M. Curran (San Clemente)
R. Dietch (SCE)
8 80086' 03