ML13322A989
| ML13322A989 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/16/1989 |
| From: | Murley T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Papay L Southern California Edison Co |
| References | |
| CAL, NUDOCS 8906020312 | |
| Download: ML13322A989 (5) | |
Text
May 16, 1989 Docket No. 50-206 Dr. Larry T. Papay, Senior Vice President Southern California Edison Company Post Office Box 800 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 92770
Dear Dr. Papay:
SUBJECT:
OPERATION OF SAN ONOFRE UNIT 1 This refers to the NRC Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) dated January 31, 1989 and the CAL followup letter dated February 8, 1989. These letters identified certain technical issues to be resolved before Unit 1 restart and requested your assessment of the aggregate significance of the various single failure and other design problems identified in recent months.
As discussed during our May 1, 1989 meeting and documented in the enclosed meeting report, your letters dated March 17 and April 18, 1989 presented the bases for your conclusion that Unit 1 could safely return to service. We concur with your characterization of the identified problems and recognize that you have established programs to identify other potential deficiencies.
We also understand that there well may be other design deficiencies hereafter identified by these ongoing programs (e.g., enhanced engineering/design activities, design basis upgrade program) and expect that they will be assessed and handled consistent with established procedures and the requirements of your license. Accordingly, the NRC hereby concurs with your intention to restart San Onofre Unit 1.
This conclusion was reached in coordination with the Region V Regional Administrator and is also based on your satisfactory response to NRC concerns, as documented in the meeting summary and your written certification dated May 12, 1989 that all commitments made to the NRC for actions to be completed during the Cycle 10 refueling outage have in fact been completed.
Sincerely, Original si ned by S. Varga for Thomas E. Murley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
- coo,
Enclosure:
DISTRIBUTION:
r Meeting Summary Docket F1Tle(50-206)
EJordan NRC/Local PDRs BGrimes 0
cc w/enclosure:
PDV Reading ACRS (10)
't Q
QfO ca See next page GHolahan JLee MVirgilio.
CTrammell EG
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE OGC,(FYI)
Martin 5 lb/89
[INPUT FOR SONGS-1 MEETING/page 4-5]
OVC; TPRTFUV*
PDT:~FUPDV*
TTATAD3ETURSF*T(A)D:DR5*
- AD, D0
- RR NAME :CTrammell:sam: GKnighton:MJVirgilio :GMHolahan n
EM rl DATE :5/15/89
- 5/15/89
- 5/15/89
- 5/16/89
/.
9
- 5 T..
l
..~n
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 May 16, 1989 Docket No. 50-206 Dr. Larry T. Papay, Senior Vice President Southern California Edison Company Post Office Box 800 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770
Dear Dr. Papay:
SUBJECT:
OPERATION OF SAN ONOFRE UNIT 1 This refers to the NRC Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) dated January 31, 1989 and the CAL followup letter dated February 8, 1989. These letters identified certain technical issues to be resolved before Unit 1 restart and requested your assessment of the aggregate significance of the various single failure and other design problems identified in recent months.
As discussed during our May 1, 1989 meeting and documented in the enclosed meeting report, your letters dated March 17 and April 18, 1989 presented the bases for your conclusion that Unit 1 could safely return to service. We concur with your characterization of the identified problems and recognize that you have established programs to identify other potential deficiencies.
We also understand that there well may be other design deficiencies hereafter identified by these ongoing programs (e.g., enhanced engineering/design activities, design basis upgrade program) and expect that they will be assessed and handled consistent with established procedures and the requirements of your license. Accordingly, the NRC hereby concurs with your intention to restart San Onofre Unit 1.
This conclusion was reached in coordination with the Region V Regional Administrator and is also based on your satisfactory response to NRC concerns, as documented in the meeting summary and your written certification dated May 12, 1989 that all commitments made to the NRC for actions to be completed during the Cycle 10 refueling outage have in fact been completed.
Sincerely, om InJ4E. M c,Dir c-tor Office of Nuclear Re c or egulation
Enclosure:
Meeting Summary cc w/enclosure:
See next page
Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin San Onofre Nuclear Generating Southern California Edison Company Station, Unit No. 1 cc Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin Vice President Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 David R.-Pigott Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 600 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94111 Mr. Robert G. Lacy Manager, Nuclear San Diego Gas & Electric Company P. 0. Box 1831 San Diego, California 92112 Resident Inspector/San Onofre NPS U.S. NRC P. 0. Box 4329 San Clemente, California 92672 Mayor City of San Clemente San Clemente, California 92672 Chairman Board of Supervisors County of San Diego 1600 Pacific Highway Room 335 San Diego, California 92101 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Mr. Paul Szalinski, Chief Radiological Health Branch State Department of Health Services 714 P Street, Office Bldg. #8 Sacramento, California 95814 (7)
Docket No. 50-206 Dr. Larry T. Papay, Senior Vice President Southern California Edison Company Post Office Box 800 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 92770
Dear Dr. Papay:
SUBJECT:
OPERATION OF SAN ONOFRE UNIT 1 This refers to the NRC Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) ated January 31, 1989 and the CAL followup letter dated February 8, 1989. T se letters identified certain technical issues to be resolved before Unit 1 restart and requested your assessment of the aggregate significance of the various single failure and other design problems identified in recent mon s.
As discussed during our May 1, 1989 meeting and ocumented in the enclosed meeting report, your letters dated March 17 and April 18, 1989 presented the bases for your conclusion that Unit 1 could sa ely return to service. We concur with your characterization of the ide ified problems and recognize that you have established programs to ident' y other potential deficiencies.
We also understand that there well may be her design deficiencies hereafter identified by these ongoing programs (e., enhanced engineering/design activities, design basis upgrade program and expect that they will be assessed and handled consistent with es ablished procedures and the requirements of your license. Accord' gly, the NRC hereby concurs with your intention to restart San Onofre Unit.
This conclusion was reached in coo dination with the Region V Regional Administrator and is also based your satisfactory response to NRC concerns, as documented in the meeting su ary and your written certification dated May 12, 1989 that all commitme s made to the NRC for actions to be completed during the Cycle 10 refueling outage have in fact been completed.
Sincerely, Thomas E. Murley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
DISTRIBUTION:
Meeting Summary Docket ilie (50-206)
EJordan NRC/Local PDRs BGrimes cc w/enclosure:
PDV Reading ACRS (10)
See next page GHolahan JLee MVirgilio CTrammell
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE OGC (FYI)
[INPUT FOR SONGS-1 MEETING/page 4-5]
OFC :PM:PDV*
D:
V* :(A)AD35:DRSP*
. RSP :AD:ADP 2a :D/DIR:NRR
- DIR:NRR NAME :CTrammell:sam:
4h:MJVirgilio : olahan
- JGPartlow
- JHSniezek
- TEMurley DATE :5/15/89
- 5/15/89
- 5/15/89
- 5/L'/89
- 5/
/89
- 5/
/89
- 5/ /89 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Docket No. 50-206 Dr. Larry T. Papay, Senior Vice President Southern California Edison Company Post Office Box 800 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 92770
Dear Dr. Papay:
SUBJECT:
OPERATION OF SAN ONOFRE UNIT 1 This refers to the NRC Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL) dated January 31, 1989 and the CAL followup letter dated February 8, 1989. These etters identified certain technical issues to be resolved before Unit 1 reslart and requested your assessment of the aggregate significance of the various single failure and other design problems identified in recent months.
As discussed during our May 1, 1989 meeting and ocumented in the enclosed meeting summary, your letters dated March 17 April 18, 1989 presented the bases for your conclusion that Unit 1 could sfely return to service. We have reviewed these submittals and based on th review we have no objection to your returning San Onofre Unit 1 to opera ion.
This conclusion was reached in coordynation with the Region V Regional Administrator and is also based on/your satisfactory response to NRC concerns, as documented in the meeting summary and your written certification dated May 12, 1989 that all commitment4 made to the NRC for actions to be completed during the Cycle 10 refueling utage have in fact been completed.
Sincerely, Thomas E. Murley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
DISTRIBUTION:
Meeting Sum ary Docket File (50-206)
EJordan NRC/Local PDRs BGrimes cc w/enc osure:
PDV Reading ACRS (10)
See ne page GHolahan MVirgilio JLee CTrammell OGC (FYI)
[INPUT FOR SONGS-1 MEETING/page 4-5]
- D---D----
-- -- -D-NAME *C ell:sam:
ton:MJVirgilio :G lahan
- JGPartlow
- JHSniezek
- TEMurley DATE :5/1{/89 5/
"/89
- 5/ 1/89
- 5//89
- 5/
/89
- 5/
/89
- 5/ /89 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY