ML13322A955

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Application to Amend App a Tech Specs 2.1 Re Reactor Core Involving Limiting Combination of Power,Pressure & Temp, 3.5.2 Re Control Group Insertion Limits & 3.11 Re Continuous Power Distribution Monitoring.W/Rept & Certificate of Svc
ML13322A955
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 12/05/1980
From: Beoletto J, Dietch R, Gilman D, Pigott D
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO., SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML13316A521 List:
References
NUDOCS 8012120413
Download: ML13322A955 (7)


Text

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY and SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY for a Class 104(b) License to Acquire, DOCKET NO. 50-206 Possess, and Use a Utilization Facility as Part of Unit No. I of the San Onofre Nuclear Amendment No. 95 Generating Station SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY and SAN DIEGO GAS

& ELECTRIC COMPANY, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, hereby submit Amendment No. 95.

This amendment consists of Proposed Change No. 100 to the Technical Specifications incorporated in Provisional Operating License No. DPR-13 as Appendices A and B. Proposed Change No. 100 is a request to revise Appendix A Technical Specifications 2.1, "REACTOR CORE -

Limiting Combination of Power, Pressure, and Temperature," 3.5.2, "Control Group Insertion Limits," and 3.11, "Continuous Power Distribution Monitoring," to allow San Onofre Unit I to be operated as described in the supporting report, "Reload Safety Evaluation, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1, Cycle 8, Revision 1," dated October, 1980.

This revision to the Reload Safety Evaluation is provided to consider the impact of the core flow reduction resulting from the steam generator modifications now underway at San Onofre Unit 1.

-2 In the event of conflict, the information in this Amendment No. 95 supersedes the information previously submitted.

Accordingly, it is concluded that (1) the proposed changes do not involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in 10 CFR 50.59, nor do they present significant hazards considerations not described or implicit in the Final Safety Analysis, and (2) there is a reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by the proposed change.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22, Proposed Change No. 100, submitted as Amendment No. 95, is determined to be a Class III change.

The basis for this determination is that the change involves a single safety issue.

Accordingly, the fee of $4,000.00 corresponding to this determination is remitted herewith as required by 10 CFR 170.22.

-3 Subscribed on this day of 4

, 1980.

Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY By Robert Dietch Vice President Subscribed and sworn to before me this d a y o f F r o

0

_2

/0_

ON.

o E mCIAL SML AGNES CRABTREE NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFOWIA PRINCIPAL OFFCE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY NotarePublic in and for the County of My Commission E Aug.27,1982 Los Ageles, State of California Agnes Crabtree My Commission Expires:

Ay ZrZ1,P

-4 Subscribed on this 25 day of ADoqi,6',) /3$O Respectfully submitted, SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY By!

D. W. Gilman Vice President Subscribed and sworn to before me this d da y o f Notary Public in and for the County of San Diego, State of California Anne R. Schmidt My Commission Expires:

- o OFFICIAL SEAL ANNE R. SCHMIDT NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA Principal Office in San Diego County My Commission Exp. Oct. 11, 1983

-5 Charles R. Kocher James A. Beoletto Attorneys for Southern California Edison Company By NJames A. Beol tto David Pigott Samual Casey Chicker

& Gregory Attorneys for San Diego Gas & Electric Company By David R. Pig0tt

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of SOUTHERN

)

CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

)

and SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC )

Docket No. 50-206 COMPANY (San Onofre Nuclear

)

Generating Station Unit No. 1)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of Amendment No. 95 was served on the following by deposit in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, on the 10th day of December 1980.

Henry J. McGurren, Esq.

Staff Counsel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20545 David R. Pigott, Esq.

Samuel B. Casey, Esq.

Chickering & Gregory Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111 John V. Morowski Bechtel Corporation P. 0. Box 60860, Terminal Annex Los Angeles, California 90060 Michael L. Mellor, Esq.

Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges Two Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111 Huey Johnson Secretary for Resources State of California 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, California 95814 Janice E. Kerr, General Counsel California Public Utilities Commission 5066 State Building San Francisco, California 94102

-2 J.

Rengel Atomic Power Division Westinghouse Electric Corporation Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 A. E. Gaede P. 0. Box 373 San Clemente, California 92672 Frederick E. John, Executive Director California Public Utilities Commission 5050 State Building San Francisco, California 94102 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 James A. Beolett \\

ssistant Counsel outhern California Edison Company