ML13322A943
| ML13322A943 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/27/1980 |
| From: | Dietch R Southern California Edison Co |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13322A942 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8009030637 | |
| Download: ML13322A943 (8) | |
Text
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Application of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
)
COMPANY and SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY )
for a Class 104(b) License to Acquire,
) DOCKET NO. 50-206 Possess, and Use a Utilization Facility as
)
Part of Unit No. 1 of the San Onofre Nuclear ) Amendment No. 92 Generating Station
)
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY and SAN DIEGO GAS
& ELECTRIC COMPANY, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, hereby submit Amendment No. 92.
This amendment consists of Proposed Change Nos. 97, 98, and 99 to the Technical Specifications incorporated in Provisional Operating License No. DPR-13 as Appendices A and B.
Proposed Change No. 97 is a request to revise the Technical Specifications to require operability of one source of offsite power and one diesel generator during shutdown and refueling operations.
Proposed Change No. 98 is a request to revise the Technical Specifications to eliminate the Auxiliary Salt Water Cooling Pump from consideration in determining the operability of the Safety Injection System.
8009030637
-2 Proposed Change No. 99 is a request to modify the Technical Specifications by updating the Administrative Controls to reflect recent organizational changes.
In the event of conflict, the information in this Amendment No. 92 supersedes the information previously submitted.
Accordingly, it is concluded that (1) the proposed changes do not involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in 10 CFR 50.59, nor do they present significant hazards considerations not described or implicit in the Final Safety Analysis, and (2) there is a reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by the proposed change.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22, Proposed Change Nos. 97 and 98 submitted as part of Amendment No. 92 are determined to be Class III changes.
The basis for this determination is that each proposed change involves a single safety issue and is deemed not to involve a significant hazards consideration.
As indicated in the document entitled, "Guidance for Assessing the
-3 Proper Licensing Fee" which was transmitted by letter dated July 12, 1979, when a single amendment contains no more than three Class III safety issues they will be assessed as separate Class III fee types and not as a Class IV fee.
Proposed Change No. 99 submitted as part of Amendment No. 92 is determined to be a Class II change.
The basis for this determination is that this proposed change is administrative in nature and has no safety or environmental significance.
Accordingly, the fee of $9,200.00 corresponding to this determination is remitted herewith as required by 10 CFR 170.22.
-4 Subscribed on this 27 day of 1980.
Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Byy Robert Dietch, Vice President Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of anZ
/f#
Notarf Public in and for the County of Los Angeles, State of California Agnes Crabtree/
ynCommission Expires://S'2 OFFICIAL SEAL AGNES CRABTREE
.N^!T4RY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Commission Exp. Aug.27. 1982 IIm b
-5 Subscribed on this day of Respectfully submitted, SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY B y i' l D. W. Gilman, Vice President Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of
/f_ _.
OFFICIAL SA IRENE J. KREPAK NOTARY PUBUIC - CALIFORNIA Principal Office In san Diego County MY Commission Exp. ]an. 24. 19841 Notary Public and fo the County of San Diego, State of Call ornia Irene J. Krepak My Commission Expires:
-6 Charles R. Kocher James A. Beoletto Attorneys for Southern California Edison Company By mes A. Beoletto David R. Pigott Samual B. Casey Chickering & Gregory Attorneys for San Diego Gas & Electric Company By David R. Piaott
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of SOUTHERN
)
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
)
and SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC )
Docket No. 50-206 COMPANY (San Onofre Nuclear )
Generating Station Unit No. 1)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of Amendment No. 92 was served on the following by deposit in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, on the
-29th day of August
, 1980.
Henry J. McGurren, Esq.
Staff Counsel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20545 David R. Pigott, Esq.
Samuel B. Casey, Esq.
Chickering & Gregory Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111 I. R. Caraco Bechtel Corporation P. 0. Box 60860, Terminal Annex Los Angeles, California 90060 Michael L. Mellor, Esq.
Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges Two Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111 Huey Johnson Secretary for Resources State of California 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, California 95814 Janice E. Kerr, General Counsel California Public Utilities Commission 5066 State Building San Francisco, California 94102
-2 J. Rengel Atomic Power Division Westinghouse Electric Corporation Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 A. E. Gaede P. 0. Box 373 San Clemente, California 92672 Frederick E. John, Executive Director California Public Utilities Commission 5050 State Building San Francisco, California 94102 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 JAMES
. BEOLET01 Assis a t Counsel Southe California Edison Company