ML13317A653
| ML13317A653 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 06/23/1981 |
| From: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Dietch R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| LSO5-81-06-092, LSO5-81-6-92, NUDOCS 8107090093 | |
| Download: ML13317A653 (3) | |
Text
DISTRIBUTION:
June 23, 1981 OELD NRC PDR OI&E (3)
Docket No. 50-206 LPDR ACRS (10)
LSO5-8T-06-092 TERA HSmith NSIC ORB #5 PM ORB #5 RF
-C-Milesr-OPA DEisenhut
__RDitggs Mr. R. Dietch, Vice President GLainas CHa.rwood Nuclear Engineering and Operations WRussell Gray File Southern California Edison Company EMcKenna Xtra Cy 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue CBerlinger Post Office Box 800 U U Rosemead, California 91770 J Li N29 1981 ~1
Dear Mr. Dietch:
U.S. NUCLEARREGULATO
SUBJECT:
SEP TOPIC FORMAT FOR DESIGN BASIS EVENT REVIEWS -
SAN 0 UNIT NO. 1A In March 1981, 'the NRC issued a draft evaluation of plant transients and accidents (DBEs) for the Palisades Plant. Based on this report, each licensee of a SEP facility was to provide safety assessments of the DBE topics for staff review.
The staff prepared an integrated report of all of the events for Palisades for our convenience in performing the integrated assessment. It was not
-our intent to require that such a report format be strictly followed for the remaining plants.
Individual topic reviews are an equally acceptable format. In some cases, you may elect to group related topics together to demonstrate that one topic is bounded by others or that the plant systemis respond similarly.
-The topic assessments that you submit should clearly identify how acceptance criteria are met and justification or planned resolution of deviations.
Results from ESARs or other documents which support your conclusions should be included in the evaluation.
Information on the analysis methods and codes, such as whether the code has been approved by the staff, is also needed.
Complete topic assessments will enable the staff to issue final SERs on the DBE topics with minimal demands on the licensee for additional information.
The guidance provided by this letter is given only to allow more flexibility in submittal of DBE topic reviews. No change in schedule should result.
Sincerely, e
()rigiflal signed Deusis Muc Cuut GU.
SO Dennis M. Crutchfeld, Chief P107090093e0500203 Operating Reactors Branch 1#5 In arch 18 teRCisue Division of p
Licensing c:
See next OFFICEO 0...R~
t./L PM~k P
NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 1981-335-96()
O ~
REG&r UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, 0. C. 20555 June 23, 1981 Docket No. 50-206 LS05-81-06-092 Mr. R. Dietch, Vice President Nuclear Engineering and. Operations Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770
Dear Mr. Dietch:
SUBJECT:
SEP TOPIC FORMAT FOR DESIGN BASIS EVENT REVIEWS -
SAN ONOFRE UNIT NO. 1 In March 1981, the NRC issued a draft evaluation of plant transients and accidents (DBEs) for the-Palisades Plant. Based on this report, each licensee of a SEP facility was to provide safety assessments of the 0BE topics for staff review.
The staff prepared an integrated report.of all of the events for Palisades for our convenience in performing the integrated assessment.
It was not our intent to require that such a report format be strictly followed for the remaining plants.
Individual topic reviews are an equally acceptable format. In some. cases, you may elect to group related topics together to demonstrate that one topic-is bounded by others or that the plant systems respond similarly.
The topic assessments that you submit should clearly identify how acceptance criteria are met and justification or planned resolution of deviations.
Results from FSARs or other documents which support your conclusions should be included in the evaluation. Information on the analysis methods and codes, such as whether the code has been approved by the staff, is also needed.
Complete topic assessments.will enable the staff to issue final SERs on the DBE topics with minimal demands on the licensee for additional information.
The guidance provided by this letter is given only to all-ow more flexibility in-submittal of DBE topic reviews. No change in schedule should result.
Si cere/y, Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chi Operating Reactors Branch Division of Licensing cc:
See next page
Mr. June 23, 1981 CC:
Charles.R. Kocher,. Assistant General Counsel James Beoletto,. Esquire Southern California-Edison Company Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 David-R. Pigott Chickering. & Gregory Three Embarcadero Center Twenty-Third Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Harry B. Stoehr San Diego Gas & Electric Company P. 0. Box 1831 San Diego, California 92112 Resident Inspector/San Onofre NPS c/o U.. S. NRC P. 0.Box 4329 San Clemente, California 92672 Mission Viejo Branch Library 24851 Chrisanta Drive Mission Viejo, California 92676 Mayor City of San Clemente San Clemente, California 92672 Chairman Board of Supervisors County of San Diego San Diego, California 92101 California Department of Health ATTN:
Chief, Environmental Radiation Control Unit Radiological Health Section 714 P Street, Room 498 Sacramento, California 95814 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX Office ATTN: EIS COORDINATOR 215 Freemont Street San Francisco, California 94111