ML13316A894

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notice of Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Supporting Exemption from Various Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.G for shutdown-related Sys
ML13316A894
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 05/14/1986
From: Lear G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML13316A893 List:
References
7590-01, 7590-1, TAC-54880, NUDOCS 8605190332
Download: ML13316A894 (5)


Text

9 0t o1 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 7590-01 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-206 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is considering issuance of an exemption from a portion of the requirements of Appendix R to 10 CFR Part 50.48, Fire Protection, to Southern California Edison Company (the licensee) for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Unit 1, located in San Diego County, California.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT:

Identification of Proposed Action:

The exemption would permit the licensee to operate shutdown-related systems not meeting various requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R Section III.G by providing equivalent levels of protection.

The Need for the Proposed Action:

The proposed exemption is needed in order to permit the licensee to use alternate fire protection configurations that achieve an equivalent level of safety compared to that attained by compliance with Section III.G of Appendix R.

-2 Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action:

The proposed Exemption would not degrade the level of safety attained by compliance with the rule and there would be no change in accident doses to the environment. Consequently, the probability of fires has not been increased and the post-fire radiological releases would not be greater than previously determined. Neither does the proposed exemption otherwise affect radiological plant effluents. Therefore, the Commission concludes that there are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with this proposed exemption.

With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed exemption involves features located entirely within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. It does not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Therefore, the Commission concludes that there are no significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed exemption.

Alternatives to the Proposed Action:

Since we have concluded that the environmental effects of the proposed action are negligible, any alternatives with equal or greater environmental impacts need not be evaluated.

The principal alternative should be to deny the requested exemption.

This would not reduce the environmental impacts associated with fire protection modifications and compliance with the rule and accrue unreasonable costs to the licensee without an increase in safety.

Alternative Use of Resources:

This action does not involve the use of resources not previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for San Onofre Unit 1.

-3 Agencies and Persons Contacted:

The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's request and did not consult other agencies or persons.

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The Commission has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed exemption.

Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, we conclude that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment.

For further details with respect to this action, see the application for exemption dated October 4 as amended December 31, 1985, and May 12, 1986, which is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., and at the Main Library, University of California, P.O. Box 19557, Irvine, California 92713.

Date at Bethesda, Maryland, this 14th day of May 1986.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION George Lear, Director PWR Project Directorate #1 Division of PWR Licensing-A

Distribution Copies:

Docket File(s)>:

PRC System GLear MFairtile RDudley PShuttleworth OELD PAD#1 r/f PAD#1 p/f

May 14, 1986 DOCKET NO.

50-206 Rules and Procedures Branch MEMORANDUM FOR:

Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration, FROM:

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ON APPENDIX R EXEMPTIONS (SAN ONOFRE 1)

One signed original of the Federal Register Notice identified below is enclosedifor your transmittal to the Office of the Federal Register for publication. Additional conformed copies (

) of the Notice are enclosed for-your use.

Notice of Receipt of Application for Construction Permit(s) and Operating License(s).

O Notice of-Receipt of Partial Application-for Construction Permit(s) and Facility License(s): Time for Submission of Views on Antitrust Matters.

El Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to-Facility Operating License.

El Notice of Receipt. of Application for Facility License(s); Notice of Availability;of Applicant's Environmental Report; and Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility License(s) and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing.

Notice of Availability of NRC Draft/Final Environmental Statement.

O Notice of Limited Work Authorization.

El Notice of Availability of Safety Evaluation Report.

E Notice of Issuance of Construction Permit(s).

Notice of Issuance of Facility Operating License(s) or Amendment(s).

Order.

Exemption.

Notice of Granting Exemption.

Environmental Assessment.

Notice of Pre paration of Environmenta -Assessment.

Other:

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Margaret R. Shuttleworth Division of PWR Licensing-A

Enclosure:

As stated

Contact:

Phone:

URNAME11 DATE10[

JRC FORM 3S (10/80 NRCM 0240-OFFICIAL RECORD COPY-