Text

2AP&ALM-AR Style B C5-N/SRC Current Production & 2AP&ALM-AR Style a Naturally Aged Alarm,Relay Output
	ML13311A278
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	12/15/1978
From:	Hewey L; FOXBORO CORP.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML13308B885	List: ML13308B884; ML13311A278; ML13311A279; ML19347E095;
References
	QOAAB33, QOAAB33-RA, NUDOCS 8104210454
	Download: ML13311A278 (42)
	v • d • e

The Foxboro Company Corporate Quality Assurance Laboratory o A33 It B

EV A Type Test Report 2AP+ALM-AR STYLE B CS-N/SPC CURRENI PRODUCTION AND 2AP+.ALM-AR STYLE A NATURALLY AGED ALARM, BELAY OUTPUI This report, the procedures, data and conclusions contained herein are the property of The Foxboro Company and shall not be loaned or otherwise transferred to a third party or reproduced, copied or used for any purpose, without written consent of The Foxboro Company.

Pre-Seismic Seismic Post-Seismic DATE OF TEST*:

JUl 77 JAN 78 MAR 78 JUN 78 JUL 78 AUG 78 TEST ENG./TECH.*:

P.A. White R.L. Anlrews G.M.

Karol W.W. Wilbur R.L.

Andrews G.M.

Karol APPROVED:

_-_e7 L.W.

Hewey, Super Corp. Qual. Assuran e Lab.

First date and name refers to current production module, second date and name refers to naturally aged module.

Registered Tradrerk Prftd bi USA F.XB4.

8xO421o

QO AAB33 THE FOIBOPC COMPANY PAGE 0 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY REV A TYPE TEST PIPOET

AATION OF LAT EST

-EVISION First Issue EEVISIoNSTATUS OF PAGES PAGE NO.

EV Title A

1-18 A

NOTE SPEC 200 is a Trademarl of The Foxboro Company 2oucT TESTED MODEL kAT.OF BAN UACTURE T111i 2AX+ALM-AR Week 26, 1977 B

2AP Week 28, 1977 A

2AX+ALM-AR Week 8, 1974 A

2AP Week 10, 1972 A

Note:

The 2AI+ALM-AR card was designed to :e used in conjunction with the 2AP signal Processing Module and was tested.as such.

The Product Code for this combination is 2AP+ALM-AR.

o0DU1_QUkALIFILE1 ODEL STYLE CERTIFICATICN CODE 2AP+ALM-AE A,B CS-N/SBC CS-N/SED 2AP A

CS-N/SRC CS-N/SRD 2AX+ALM-AB B

CS-N/SRC CS-N/SED

1.

QOAAB01, Demonstration/Analysis of Qualified Life

2. QOAAA20, Parts 1 and 2, Seismic Test Reports

3.

IEEE& 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975

4.

ISA2-S51.1-1 9 7 6, Process Instrumentation Terminology

5.

QOAAA02, Performance Tests and Operating Influence Tests for Rack-Mounted Modules R EV.1S ION _hIS jT 01Y FEV DATE A

15 DEC 78

nstitute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Incorporated zInstrument Society of America

THE FOXBORO COMPANY Q0AAB33 COPPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 1 TYPE TEST REPORT REV A

7.

TEST OBJECTIVE To verify the Class 1E performance characteristics and the operating influences of specified service conditions on module performance per Qualification Procedures of IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975.

The enclosed specifications for environmental influences of service conditions reflect pre-seismic acceptance criteria; relative to post seismic data they represent tggt acceptance criteria.

Specifications for seismic influence also reflect iti acceptance criteria since the end user must ultimately define the acceptance criteria for each O

application.

Data is provided to support the qualification of the Style B model of current production.

Data is also provided herein on the Style A naturally aged unit for reference in Report QOAAB01.

QOAAB01 provides the user with consolidated information which can be used in estimating qualified life of the SPEC 200 product line.

II.

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS Both the current production and naturally aged 2AP+ALM-AR Absolute Alarms, Relay Outputs, when tested in a 2ANU-D Nest, were within specifications for all pre-seismic and post-seismic tests.

Performance was also within target acceptance criteria during and after seismic tests.

Both modules maintained their structural integrity throughout seismic tests.

III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS NOTE 1:

Measurement equipment accuracy during pre-seismic and post-seismic tests was 0.05%.

Therefore, all data is reported to this tolerance.

NOTE 2:

All test were conducted with Alarm No. I as a high alarm and Alarm No. 2 as a low alarm.

A.

Calibration Characteristics Reference Conditions:

Temperature 23 t20 C Relative.Humidity 40 +/-10%

Supply Voltage +15,

-15 V dc +/-0.1%

Specification:

Accuracy:

Dial Setting, +/-2%

Test Jacks, t1%

Repeatability:

Set Point, 0.5%

Firing Pcint, 0.5%

Lockup, 0.1%

Q0AAB33.

THE FOBORC COMPANY

-PAGE 2'-

CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY REV A TYPE TEST BEPORT III.

SUMMARY

LOF TEST RESULTS (Continued) glibration Cbaqtte stjgg (Continued)

1.

Current Produti2n module

a.

Caljbration Per Dial Setting Pre-spispic Post-Seisaic Alarm 1 Alars 2 Alar_ 1 Alarm 2 Measured Accuracy, %

+0.35

+0.45

+0.15

+0.50

-1.10

-0.35

-0.70

-0.50 Zero Error, 5

+0.30

+0.10

+0.05

+0.45 Span Error, 5

-0.20

-0.05

<0.05

-0.50 Set Point Repeatability, %

0.43 0.05 0.20 0.33 Firing Point Repeatability, %

<0.05

<0.05 Lockup Repeatability, 5

<0.05

<0.05 Linearity (Independent), %

t0.55

+/-0.20

+/-0.35

+/-0.20

b.

Calibration Per Test Jacks pr1-e-gisic Post-Seismic Alarm 1 Aig.ILg2 Alara 1 Alarm 2 M sured Accuracy,

( +0.10

<0.05

+0.10

<0.05

-0.15

<0.05

-0.15 Error, %

+0.10

-0.10

+0.10

-0.05 San Error, %

<0.05

-0.05

-0.05 Set Point Repeatability, 5 0.15 0.10

<0.05

<0.05 Firing Point Repeatability, 5

<0.05

<0.05 0.05 Lockup Repeatability, 5

<0.05

<0.05 Linearity (Independent), 5

<0.05

+/-0.05

<+/-0.05

2.

Naturally &Qed-Bo2duIe3 Pre-Seismic Es-esi Ai1&.2.

Alarm 2 lrm 1 Alarm 2 Measured Accuracy, 5+

(

+1.95

+1.10

+1.30

+0.15

-1.10

-1.30

-0.15

-1.75 Zero Error, 5

+1.10

+0.90 (0.05

<0.05 Span Error, %

-1.20

-1.30

-0.10

-0.70 Set Point Repeatability, 5 0.40 0.35 0.25 0.45 Firing Point Repeatability, 5

<0.05

<0.05 0.05 Lockup Repeatability,

<0.05

<0.05 Linearity-(Independent), %

+/-0.50

+/-0.55

+/-0.63

+/-0.50 t Jack calibrations were not performed since there were no set nt output jacks on the Style A naturally aged module.

THiEFOXBORO COMPANY QOAAB33 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 3 TYPE TEST PEPORT BEV A III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST PESULTS (Continued)

B.

Sgppi1 Voltage Effects Reference Conditions:

Temperature 23 t2 0 C Relative Humidity 40 t10%

Supply Voltage +15,

-15 V dc +/-0.1%

Specification:

The firing point will change less than +/-0.25% for a +/-51 change in supply voltage.

1.

Current Production Module Firin_Point Shift J% of j

n a!!EEP1L--oltaf-R-1...

___fe-Sei smic---

Post-Seismic gsitive NeSailxt Alarm No _1 jAlarm N._2 Alar ENc. 1 Alarm No.

2 15.00 15.00 Ref.

Ref.

Zef.

15.75 15.75

<0.05

<0.05 14.25 14.25

<0.05

<0.05 15.75, 14.25

<0.05

<0.05 14.25 15.75

<0.05

2.

Naturall _Aged Module Firipgjoint Shift J_

f ipAnt 2!1oaeIYdci Pre-Seismic Post-Seismic Positive Negalive Alarm No.

1 Alarm No.

2 Alarm No.

1 Alarm No.

2 15.00 15.00 Ref.

Pef.

Ref.

15.75 15.75

<0.05

<0.05 14.25 14.25

<0.05

<0.05 15.75 14.25

<0.05

<0.05 14.25 15.75

<0.05

<0.05 (11)~

Q.0A A B3.3 THE FOXBORO COMPANY PAGr '3 CORPOPATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PEV A TYPE TEST REPORT III..

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

C.

Ambient Tempegrature Effects Set Point at 50%

Lockup at 1%

Reference Conditions:

Temperature 27 20 C Relative Humidity 40 +/-10%

Supply voltage +15, -15 V dc +/-0.1%

Specification:

The firing point will shift less than +/-0.5% for a 280 C change within the normal operating limits of 5 to 500C.

1.

Current Production Module Firing Pot9int Shit J fy L

Pre-Seiic

_-Seismic Temerature oC Alarm No.

1 Alarm N_._2 AlarRAN.2I Alarm No.

2 27 Ref.

Ref.

Bef.

Ref.

<0.05

<0.05 27

<0.05

<0.05 50

<0.05

<0.05 60

<0.05

<0.05 27

<0.05

2.

NaturallyAed m.odule Firing_Point Sb'ift JJoSpaL Pre-Seismic Post-Seismic Temerature oC0 Alarm No.

1 Alarm No.

2 Alarm No.

1 Alarm No.

2 27 Ref.

Ref.

4

<0.05

<0.05 27

<0.05

<0.05 50

<0.05

<0.05 60

+0.05

<0.05

-0.05

<0.05 27

+0.10

<0.05

QOkAB33 THE FOXBORO COMPANY PAGE 5 COPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY E A TYPE TEST REPORT

SUMMARY

OFT ULTS (Continued)

D.

Eelative Bumidity Effects Set Point at 50%

Lockup at 1%

Reference Conditions:

Temperature 31 12oC Relative Humidity 50 +/-5%

Supply Voltage +15, -15 V dc to.1%

Specification:

The firing point shift for a change in relative humidity from reference to 95% at a maxiaum vet bulb of 30 0 C vill be less than +/-0.5%.

1.

Current Production_.2ASIS Relative Pre-Seismic tost-Seismc 2

Humidity 1%L AlarmNo.

1 Alars N.j2 Alar No.

1 ~Ars 2

50 Ref.

Ref.

95

<0.05

<0.05 50

<0.05

2.

Naturgilt_Aged Module F___iring Point ShiftJ oSPL-----

Relative Pre-Sismic_.os es Humijity jL Alarm No.

1 Alarm No.

2 Alarm No.

1 Alars No.

2 50 Ref.

Bef.

Ref.

95

<0.05

<0.05 50

<0.05

COAAB33 THE FOXBORC COMPANY PAGE.3 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY FE A

TYPE TEST EEPOPT II.

SUMMARY

_0?

TEST PESULT5 (Continued)

@E.

Respongg_11~eS Set Point at 50%; Lockup at 1%; Alarm No.

4, El Alarm; Alarm No. 2, LO Alarm Peference Conditions:

Temperature 23 +/-20C Relative Humidity 40 +/-10%

Supply Voltage +15, -15 V dc +/-0.1%

Specification:

Typically 20 as, based in a 50% input step from 25 to 50%, with the set point at 50% of span.

1.

Current Production Module Resonse stas Input Step Pt.rPigDjc

-___-s_-eism c__

2 Alar.

Alarm No. 2 Alarm No..

AlLl

o.

2 25 to 75 18 17 20 21 75 to 25 19 19 21 20

2.

Naturally Ae2 Module Response Timge1 W nput Step Pre-Seismic Post-Seismic Alarm No. 1 Alarm No.

2 AlarpNo.

1 lars No.__

o 25 to 75 18 22 16 18 75 to 25 16 19 16 18

THF FOXBOPO COMPANY QOAAB33 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 7 TYPE TEST REPORT BEV A III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic Vibration Effects

1.

Test Facility Acton Environmental Testing Laboratory, Acton, MA

2.

Test Objective To demonstrate that the module vill perform its Class 1E functions as mounted in an N-2ES Back which is loaded in accordance with established rack-loading guidelines and is subjected to floor-level inputs of magnitude equal to or exceeded by those defined by the Fcxboro4 Generic Response Spectra for Floor-Mounted Equipment, shown in the following.

II

______owl t

Crt I

a im I

o 16 OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE (OBE)

SAFE SHUTDOWN EAPTHQUAKE (SSE)

GENERIC REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRA (FPS) FOR QUALIFICATION OF FLOOR-MOUNTED CONTROL ROOM EQUIPMENT -

HORIZONTAL AND VEPTICAL The Foxboro Company

.QOAAB33 THE FOXBORO COMPANY PAAGE B CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PEV A TYPE TEST FHOPT Il:.

suMARY OFTESTPESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic Vibrati2n Effeggs (Continued)

3.

Testrohcedure Each module was mounted in a 2ANU-D Nest at Level 1 (toP level) of a N-2ES Rack.

Each nest was subjected to a separate series of tests with band-limited white noise (random) inputs applied at the base of the rack for a duration of 30,seconds.

Inputs as determined by the Test Response Spectra (TES) of the test table exceeded the OBE and SSE levels for floor mounted equipment defined in Section III.F.2., vith the objective of producing TRS's at the module mounting Iccation which enveloped the GENERIC REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR QUALIFICATION OF RACK-MOUNTED MODULES.

Five tests at the OBE level and one at the SSE level were performed in each of four planes, front-to-back and vertical, back-to-front and vertical, left-to-right and vertical, and right-to-left and vertical with horizontal and vertical inputs applied simultaneously and in phase.

TPS's were generated from accelerometers on the table and at the module mounting location for 1, 2.5, and 5% damping during OBE and SSE tests.

The module was energized and functioning during all tests, and its primary performance functions were monitored during and immediately after each SSE and each series of OBE tests.

0 III)

TJE FOXBORO COMPANY QOAAB33 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 9 TYPE TEST REPORT REV A III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST PESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic Vibration Effects JContinue d)

4.

Seismic, Summaland Conclusions The 2AP+ALM-AR Module from current production was tested in Nest No. 2s.

The 2AP+ALM-AR naturally aged unit was tested in Nest No. 1As.

All one-third octave response points achieved in testing of the naturally aged unit exceeded the target GENERIC REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR QUALIFICATION OF PACK MOUNTED MODULES (Pefer to Section III.F.5.b.).

Relative to the target BRS's, undertesting occurred at seven of 84 one-third octave response points in the vertical response in testing the unit from current production.

However, five of these points were at 1.25 or 1.6 Hz, resulting from test table velocity limitations, and are not considered to be significant.

Two pcints were marginally low, at 6.3 Hz (TES - Front-to-Back and Vertical) and at 12.5 Hz (TES - Fight-to-Left and Vertical).

Peak respcnse levels of the vertical RRS's are considerably lover than those of the horizontal RPS's, and are considered to be of such less significance relative to module performance during seismic testing.

Undertesting occurred at two of 84 one-third octave response points, in the horizontal response at 20 Rz (TRS Back-to-Front and Vertical, TRS -

Front-to-Back and Vertical).,

having resulted from difficulty in ottaining the desired test table response at 20 Hz (Pefer to Section IV.F.5.a.).

Overall, the TRS's achieved are considered to provide the required basis for demonstrating successful performance of the 2AP+ALM-AS Module at or above the response levels of the target RPS's.

sPeference QOAAA20, Parts 1 and 2, Seismic Test Reports.

QOAAB33 THE FOXBORO COMPANY PAGE 13 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY REV A TYPE TEST REPORT ii.

SUMMARY

LOFTESTPESULTS (Continued)

Seismic Vibration Effects (Continued)

5.

TestRgsults_J§ smic Pesonsel 1% damped Test Respcnse Spectra are plotted below at one-third octave intervals for each of the four SSE tests, as obtained at the module mounting location (see dots).

GENERIC REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRA POP QUALIFICATION OF RACK-MOUNTED MODULES are also shown on the same plots (solid line) to permit a direct comparison of the two plots.

a. grEent Prodgction Module TaS - Front-to-BaqVertical Plane 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I it RQUE*I 1

I wr "a

0 Front-to-Back Response Vertical Response

THE-?OXB0F0 COMPANY QOAAB33 CORPORATE QrIALITY AS-SURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 11 TYPE TEST REPORT REV A Ill.

SUMMARY

~ OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic Vibration Effects (Continued)

5.

R-e sulsjesi Re~n (Continued)

a.

Current Production Modu le (Continued)

TRS-Back-to-Front/Vertical Plane F

N:

. T Back-to-LFot Response Vertical Response

C-.)-

3

NC' LAOQATORY 7 -

Z:

vertc

,-.-pO

.THE FOXBORO COMPANY QOAAB33 C GRPORATF QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 13 TYPF TES7 REPORT REV A III.

SUM1MAFY OF TEST PESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic-Vibration Effects (Continued)

5.

Test Results iSei smic ___~~g

__ntnu

b.

Naturally-ged Module (Continued)

TRS Back-to-fronjt/V ertjcalPlane 10 10C

-44 M

j K:

110 O Back to #ront Response Vertical PesFcnse TPS _-_igbht-to-jteftVertia Flane l~TM 2z f4 -i It 4p

_7Z__

.1,

_z~

~50

. ight-to-Left Response Vertical Response

.QOAAB53 3 T F I FO': 3 CE&

t~ 1.

P AC G FI CCO.POPAT'-

QUAL.I

~

ANCF IA FOPA'TOr)Y Ii:. :s;.OF 7? FEFSULTS (Continue- '

S~s~c VbraionEffects (Coptinued-)

5. Test Results (Seis mic Respon e Cr~iu Module-M Eelo(Cciiue c-)

b.

NaurllYL-Aqt-------(C-nire 77-7 r1'F' w

tHE FOXBORO COMPANY QOAAB33 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 15 TYPE TEST REPORT PEV A III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic Vibration Effects (Ccntinued)

6.

Test ResultyMoiule Pelformancez algetAcceptance CriteriL Note:

Measurement Equipment Accuracy after seismic tests was 0.1%.

Target Acceptance Criteria:

Spurious outputs of the alarms of a duration greater than 100 aicroseccnds will not occur with the set point and input values within +/-2% of each other.

a.

Current Production Module NOTE:

Alarms A and B were tested as HI and LO Alarms, respectively. During tests Alarm A was set point at 51% and Alarm B set point at 49% with both inputs at 50%.

1.

5 OBE Tests Did Alarm Set Point Fire' During Shift %,

Test After Test Plane of Alarm Alarm Alarm Alarm Vibration A

B A

B Front-to-Back No No

<0.1

<0.1 Back-to-Front No No

<0.1

<0.1 Left-to-Right No No

<0.1

<0.1 Right-to-Left No No

<0.1

2.

SSE Test Did Alarm Set Point Fire' During Shift %,

Test After Test Plane of Alarm Alarm Alarm Alari Vibration A

B A

B Right-to-left No No

<0.1

<0.1 Left-to-Right No No

<0.1

<0.1 Back-to-Front No No

<0.1

<0.1 Front-to-Back No No

<0.1

3.

Both alarms were operated during one OBE and one SSE to ensure proper operation during seismic.

'outputs were monitored with contact chatter monitcrs capable of detecting 100 microsecond opening or closure.

jQ0AAD3 "3 THE FOXBC COBMILEY PAGE 16 COPOEATE QUALITx &SStANCE LABOFATORY PFV A TYPE TESS BEPOPT Ill.

1955121 91 11-TS (Continued)

F.

it5itlibratjon Cis (Continued)

6.

lest Results (Continued)

b.

Naintljlyf.2i Module NOTE:

Alarms A and B were tested as HI and LO Alarms, respectively. During tests Alarm A was set at 51%

and Alarm B set at.49% with the inputs at 50%.

1. 5_9BL g sts Did Alarm Set Point Fire? During Shift %,

Test AteLTest Plane of Alarm Alarm Alarm

Alan, y bjt jD-A-B A

-I Front-to-Back No No

+0.3

<0.1 Back-to-Front No No

<0.1

<0.1 Right-to-Left No No

<0.1

-0.1 Left-to-Right No No

<0.1

-0.2

2.

SSE Test Did Alarm Set Point Fire' During Shift %,

s Test Plane of Alarm Alarm Alarm Alarm libratiqg A

B A

p Front-to-Back No No

<0.1

<0.1 Back-to-Front No No

<0.1

<0.1 Bight-to-Left No No

<0.1

<0.1 Left-to-Bight No No

<0.1

3.

Both alarms were operated during one OBE and one SSE to ensure proper operation during seismic.

7.

Wu"_Zgs an&d&&

Cgter of Gravity masss IISAl_

5A Ltk_

Depth Mtodel 11b q_

"n g

n Ei.

cm 2AP+ALM-AR 1.60 728 4.4 11.0 0.8 2.0 1.5 4.0 2AP 1.18 534 4.5 11.5 0.8 2.0 1.2 3.0 2AX+ALE-AP 0.43 196 2.7 7.0 1.2 3.0 4.1 10.5 Note:

Reference for height, width, and depth measurements was the lower left rear of the front plate.

utputs were monitored with contact chatter monitors capable f detecting 100 us opening or closure.

THE FOXBOPO COMPANY Q0AAB33 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 17 TYPE TEST REPORT REV A IlI.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

G.

Test Equipment

1.

Pre-Seismic

a.

Current Production Module Calitration Information Instrument Manufacturer Model Serial Last Date Date Due Ramp Generator Foxboroe N/A N/A N/A N/A Power Supply H-P9 6227B 1946A00880 2/76 8/77 Power Supply Lambdat0 LCD-4-33 087451 3/77 9/77 DVM Data Tech."

350 18500 6/77 12/77 Environmental TTUPR Chamber Tenney'2 40240 4709 2/77 8/77 o

b.

NaturallyAged Module Calibration Information Instrumnt Manufacturer Model Serial Last Date Date Due Function Generator H-P 3310A 1151A07203 9/77 6/78 Oscilloscope Tektronix' 3 564 007413 2/78 8/78 Digital Voltmeter Data Tech.

350 18222 2/78 8/78 Ramp Generator Foxboro N/A N/A 3/78 9/79 Environmental TTUP Chamber Tenney U0240 4709 11/77 10/78

2.

Post-Seismic

a.

Current Production Module gAlibration Information Instrument Maufacturer Model Serial Last Date Date Due DVM SD'*

7000 1865 11/77 5/78 Pamp Generator Foxboro W/A N/A Power Supply H-P 1135A 01590 1/78 1/79 Power Supply H-P 1135A 01591 1/78 1/79 Environmental TTUPR Chamber Tenney 40240 4502 1/78 10/78 Environmental FR Chamber Blue M's 366PCX AA-324 11/77 8/77 Storage Oscilloscope H-P 184A 1316A 12/77 9/78 sThe Foxboro Company

'Hewlett-Packard Company toLambda Electronics, Division of VEECO Instruments, Incorporated

"'Data Technology Corporation

' 2 Tenney Engineering, Company O 13Tektronix, Incorporated

Systron Donner (Formerly Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation)

'sBlue M Electric Company

00AAE33 THE FOXBOP. COMPANY PACE* 18 COPORATE QUALITY ASSUEANCE LABOPATORY Y V A TYPE TEST REPOFT I7I.

SUMMARY

OF TEST FESULTS (Continued)

Test Eguipment (Continued)

3.

Seismic

a.

Current Production Module Calibration Informatio:

InstrumEn Manufacturer Model Serial Last Date Date Due Power SupDly H-P 60155C 1135A0136 6/76 1/78 Voltage Source EDC 1 6 MV100N 1890 12/77 6/78 Rame Generator Foxboro N/A N/A N/A N/A Dve SD 7000A 1117 9/77 3/78 False Contact Mro.itor Matrix

202D 310 1/78 6/78

b.

Naturally Aaed Module Calibration Information irnstrunm=t Manufacturer Model Serial Last Date Date Due Power Supply H-P 60155C 9135A01505 3/78 9/79 Voltage Source EDC MV100N 4968 3/78 9/78 "amr) Generator Foxboro N/A N/A N/A N/A Data Tech.

350 1864 4/78 10/78 False Contact enerator Matrix 202D 310 1/78 6/78 Electronic Development Corporation Matrix, Incorporated

The Foxboro Company IA Corporate Quality Assurance Laboratory REV C Type Test Report 2Al-I3V STYLE A CS-N/SRC CURRENT PRODUCTION AND STYLE A NATURALLY AGED CURRrNT-TO-VOLTAGE CONVERTERS This report, the procedures, data and conclusions contained herein are the property of The Foxboro Company and shall not be loaned or otherwise transferred to a third party or reproduced, copie:

_r used for any purpose, without written consent of The Foxboro Company.

Pre-Seismic Seismic Post-Seismic DATE O

TEST*:

JUL 77 JAN 78 APP 78 FEB 78 JUL 78 AUG 78 m'c' ENG./TECH.*:

G.M.

Karol E.L. Andrews F.D.

Wardyga, Jr.

E.D.

ardyga, Jr.

R.L.

Andrews E.D.

Wardyga, Jr.

r-PPROVED:

t Date: /

L.W. Hevey, Supervi r, Corp. Cual. Assurar e Yab.

?O date or name refers to current production mcdule, seconl date or name refers to naturally aged module.

bOX BORO

Rester~d Temar*

Prined in USAfa 810.4210W4

QUAiB13 THE FO1BORO COMPANY TAGE 0 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY

£EV C TYPE TEST REPORT

PLANAt O

I L LATEST BEVISION odhfied notes on Pages 18 and 19; added voltage source to Sections II.

G.1.b.,

G.2.a.,

and G.2.b.

S~j G_E S

0ES Title C

1 -

17 A

18 -

19 C

20 A

NOTE SPEC 200 is a Trademark of The Foxboro Company PRORgCT TESTED MODEL pAT E 9 Af FACTU RE STYLE 2Al-I3V Week 26, 1977 A

2AI-I3V Week 30, 1973 A

QLgC QUALIFIED MODEL STYJ&

CERTIFICAT QgQPj 2Al-I3V A

CS-N/SEC CS-N/SED EEFEREICE DOCUMENTS

1. Q0AAB01, Demonstration/Analysis of Qualified Life

2. QOAAA20, Parts 1 and 2, Seismic Test Reports

3. IEEE' 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975

4.

ISA 2-S51.1-1976, Process Instrumentation Terminology

5. QOAAA02, Performance Tests and Operating Influence Tests for Rack-Mounted Modules REVISION HISTORY PEV DATE A

3 NOV 78 B

9 BAR 79 C

7 APR 80

'Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Incorporated nstrusent Society of America

TH E FOXBORO COMPANY Q0AAB13 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATOPY PAGE 1 TYPE TEST REPORT REV A I. TEST-OBJECTIVE To verify the Class 1E performance characteristics and the operating influences of specified service conditions on module performance per Qualification Procedures of IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975.

The enclosed specifications for environmental influences of service conditions reflect pre-seismic acceptance criteria; relative to post seismic data they represent target acceptance criteria.

Specifications for seismic influence also reflect targgt acceptance criteria since the end user must ultimately define the acceptance criteria for each application.

Data is provided to support the qualification of the Style A model of current production.

Data is also provided herein on the Style A naturally aged unit for reference in Report Q0AAB01. QOAAB01 provides the user with consolidated information which can be used in estimating qualified life of the SPEC 200 product line.

II.

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS Both the current production and naturally aged 2Al-I3V Current-to Voltage Converters, when enclosed in a 2ANU-D Nest, performed within specification during pre-seismic and post-seismic type tests.

Performance was also within target acceptance criteria during and after seismic tests.

Both modules maintained their structural integrity throughout seismic tests.

0

QOAAB13 THE FOXBORO COMPANY PAGE 2 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PEV A TYPE TEST REPORT

1.

SUMMARY

OF TESTRESULTS Measurement equipment accuracy for this test was 0.05%, therefore, all data is reported to that tolerance.

A.

CalibrationCharacteristics Reference Conditions:

Temperature 23 t20C Relative Humidity 40 15%

Supply Voltage +15,

-15 V dc +/-0.1%

Specification:

Accuracy +/-0.25%

1.

Current Production Module Error in

% of Input Pre-Seismic Post-Seismic Channel A Channel B Channel A Channel B Measured Accuracy (0.05

<0.05

+0.05 L <0.05

-0.10

-0.05

-0.05 Zero Error

<0.05

+0.05 Span Error

<0.05

-0.05

-0.10 Repeatability

<0.05

<0.05 Hysteresis

<0.05

<0.05 0.05

<0.05 Linearity (Independent)

<+/-0.05

2.

Naturally_Aed Module Error in % f input Span----------

Pre-Seismic Post-Seismic Channel A Channel E Channel A Channel B Measured Accuracy)

(+0.20

+0.20

<0.05

+0.05

-0.10

+0.15

-0.05

<0.05 Zero Error

+0.20

<0.05

<0.05 Span Error

-0.10

-0.05

<0.05 Repeatability

<0.05 0.05

<0.05

<0.05 Hysteresis

<0.05 0.05

<0.05

<0.05 Linearity (Independent)

<+/-0.05

THE FOXBORO COMPANY QOAAB13 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 3 TYPE TEST REPORT REV A III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST PESULTS (Continued)

B.

SupplyVo11a E

ts Reference Conditions:

Temperature 23 t20 C Relative Humidity 40 110%

Supply Voltage +15,

-15 V dc +/-0.1%

Specification:

The supply voltage error will be no more than +/-0.2% for a +/-5% shift in the +415, -15 V dc.

1.

Current Production Module SplyI ltage-------

OutSif J

cf SpaL JVL_ _Pre-Seismic Post-Seismic Channel A Channe IB Channel A Channel B

+

0%

100%

0%

100%

0%

100%

0%

100%

15.00 15.00 Ref.

Ref.

15.75 15.75 <0.05

<0.05

-0.05

<0.05 -0.05

-0.05 14.25 14.25 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

+0.05

<0.05

.0.05

<0.05 15.75 14.25 <0.05

<0.05

+0.05 +0.05

<0.05 +0.05

<0.05 14.25 15.75 <0.05 <0.05

<0.05

<0.05 -0.05

<0.05

-0.05

2.

Naturally Aged Module SpyVotg OtASitA 1% of S

_an Pre-Seismic Post-Seismic Channel A Channel B Channel A Channel B

+

0%

100%

0%

100%

0%

100%

0%

100%

15.00 15.00 Ref.

Bef.

Ref.

Bef.

ef.

Ref.

15.75 15.75 <0.05

<0.05

<0.05 <0.05

<0.05

<0.05 14.25 14.25 <0.05

+0.05 <0.05

+0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 15.75 14.25 <0.05

+0.05

<0.05

+0.05

<0.05

<0.05 14.25 15.75 <0.05

<0.05

QOKAB13 THE FOXBORO COMPANY PAGE 4 CORPOPATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABOPATORY PEV A TYPE TEST REPORT I.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

C.

Ambient Tempgrature Effects Reference Conditions:

Temperature 27 120 C Relative Humidity 40 t10%

Supply Voltage +15, -15 V dc t0.1%

Specification:

The maximum error for a change in ambient temperature of 280 C vithin the normal operating limits of S and 500 C vill not exceed t0.5%.

1.

Current Production Module Out put Shift_.JLcf Span1 Pre-Sejsuic Post-SeiSmic Ambient Channel A Channel B Channel A Channel B Te Oerature-J0C) 01 100%

01 100%

0%

100%

01 100%

27 Ref.

Ref.

Pef.

Bef.

Ref.

Bef.

4

<0.05

<0.05 <0.05 +0.10

+0.10

<0.05

<0.05 27

<0.05

+0.05

<0.05

<0.05 50

-0.05

<0.05

-0.05

+0.05

-0.10

<0.05

<0.05 60

-0.10

<0.05

-0.05

+0.10

+0.15

-0.15

<0.05

<0.05 27

-0.05

+0.10

<0.05

+0.05

<0.05

2.

Naturalli yAged Module Output ShiftJ(_cf Span__

Pre-Seismic Post-Seismic Ambient Channel A Channel B Channel A Channel B Temt IALtugJ!Q_

0%

100%

0%

100%

01 100%

0%

100%

27 Ref.

Pef.

Ref.

4

<0.05

<0.05 27

<0.05

<0.05 50

<0.05

-0.05

<0.05

-0.05 60

<0.05

-0.05

<0.05

-0.10 27

<0.05

THE FOXBORO COMPANY Q0AAB13 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 5 TYPE TEST REPORT PEV A II.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

D.

Relative Humidity Effects Reference Conditions:

Temperature 23 t20 C Relative Humidity 50 t5%

Supply Voltage +15, -15 V dc +/-0.1%

Specification:

The error due to an exposure to an atmosphere of 95% relative humidity at a maximum vet bulb of 300 C when referenced to 50% relative humidity vill be no greater than +/-0.5%.

1.

Current Production Module

-outul Shift f of Sput.

Pre-Seismic Post-Seimic Relative Channel A Channel B Channel A Channel B Humidi tyJL 0%~

.000_

0 100%

0_

100%

0%

100%

50 Ref.

Ref.

Bef.

Ref.

Pef.

95

<0.05

<0.05 50

<0.05

-0.05

<0.05

2.

Naturally Aaed Nodule Outpul Shift of SpanL Pre-eismic ost-Seisic Relative Channel A Channel B Channel A Channel B Humidity_1%L 0%

100%

0%

100CIE 07 100%

0%

100%

50 Ref.

Bef.

Ref.

Bef, Ref.

Ref.

Pef.

95

<0.05

-0.05

+0.15

+0.30

<0.05

<0.05 <0.05 50

<0.05

<0.05 0

QOAAB13 THE FOXBORO COMPANY PAGE 6 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABOPATORY

~EV A TYPE TEST REPORT

11.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

E.

Response Time Reference Conditions:

Temperature 23 t20C Relative Humidity 40 110%

Supply Voltage +15,

-15 V dc +/-0.1%

Specification:

When excited by an 80% input step (10 to 90% change), the time required for the output to reach 90%

of the final steady-state value is 37 milliseconds nominal and 50 milliseconds maximum for the 10 Hz filter.

1.

Current Production Module ITested with 10 Hz FilterL

a. 10%_Step (45 to 55%)

Pre-Seismic Post-Seismic Channel A Channel B Channel A Channel B Step Step Step Step Step Step Step Step Up Down Up_

Down

_Up_

Down Up_

Down ead Time, ms

<1

<1 0% Response Time, Ps 12 10 10 9

10 11 11 12 90% Response Time, ms 36 34 35 35 31 32 31 32

b. 80% Step (10 to 90%)

EERismic Post=jgigaic SkChuL&AR

_Chaapal B Channel A Channel B Step Step Step Step Step Step Step Step

!P_

Rown U_

Down Up_

Down Dead Time, ms

<1

<1 50% Response Time, ms 10 10 11 11 11 10 10 10 90% Response Time, ms 36 35 36 36 34 31 31 31

THE FOXBORO COMPANY QOAAB13 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 7 TYPE TEST REPORT REV A III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

E.

!gs2onse Time (Continued)

2.

Naturally _ged Module

a.

1.0% Step (45 to 55%)

PrePost:Seisic ChannelA_

Channel B Channel A Channel B Step Step Step Step Step Step Step Step Up9 Down Up Down

_q_

Down

__Up_

Down Dead Time, as

<1

<1 50% Response Time, as 12 11 12 11 12 14 12 13 90% Response Time, as 38 39 38 40 39 40 40 39

b.

80% Step (10 to 90%)

Pre-Seismic Post-seismic Channel A Channel B Channel A ChannelE Step Step Step Step Step Step Step Step

-RE-Dvn U

PPE UP Down U

Do. wnwn Dead Time, ms

<1

<1 (1

<1 50% Response Time, as 16 15 14 15 16 15 14 16 90% Response Time, as 40 (41 39

~40

'42 (43 38 43

Q0AAB13 THE FOXBOPO COMPANY PAGE 9 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABOEATORY REV A TYPE TEST REPORT II.

SUMMAPY OF, TEST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic Vibration Effects

1.

Test Facility Acton Environmental Testing Laboratory, Acton, MA

2.

Test Objective To demonstrate that both the current production and naturally aged modules will perform their Class 1E functions as mounted in an N-2ES Rack which is loaded in accordance with established rack-loading guidelines and is subjected to floor level inputs of magnitude equal to or exceeded by those defined by the Foxboro3 Generic Response Spectra for Floor Mounted Equipment, shown in the following.

9.,.

OPERATING BASIS EARTHQUAKE (OBE)

SAFE SHUTDOWN EARTHQUAKE (SSE)

GENERIC REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRA (BPS)

FOR QUALIFICATION OF FLOOP-MOUNTED CCNTFOL ROOM EQUIPMENT HOPIZONTAL AND VEETICAL 3The Foxboro Company

TRE FOXBORO COMPANY QOAAB13 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 9 TYPE TEST REPORT REV A III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic Vibration Effegjs (Continued)

3.

Test Procedure With either module mounted in Level 1 (top level) of a N-2ES

Rack, a series of tests were performed with band-limited white noise (random) inputs applied at the base of the rack for a duration of 30 seconds.

Inputs as determined by the Test Response Spectra (TRS) of the test table exceeded the OBE and SSE levels for floor mounted equipment defined in Section III.F.2., with the objective of producing TES's at the module mounting location which enveloped the GENERIC REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR QUALIFICATION OF BACK-MOUNTED MODULES.

Five tests at the OBE level and one at the SSE level were performed in each of four planes, front-to-back and vertical, back-to-front and vertical, left-to-right and vertical, and right-to-left and vertical with horizontal and vertical inputs applied simultaneously and in phase.

TRS's were generated from accelerometers on the table and at the module mounting location for 1, 2.5, and 5% damping during OBE and SSE tests.

The module was energized and functioning during all tests, and its primary performance functions were monitored during and immediately after each SSE and each series of OBE tests.

0I

Q00AB13 THE FOXBOPO COMPANY PAGE 10 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PEV A TYPE TEST REPORT I!. SUMEARY OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic VibrAtion Effects (Cotninued)

4.

Seimic Summary_and Conclusions The 2Al-13V Module from current production was tested in Nest No. 24.

The naturally aged unit was tested in Nest No. IA4.

All one-third octave response points achieved in testing of the naturally aged unit enveloped the target GENERIC REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR QUALIFICATION OF RACK-MOUNTED MODULES (Refer to Section III.F.5.b.).

Relative to the target RRS's, undertesting occurred at eight of 168 one-third octave response points in testing of the module from current production.

Of these, five points occurred at 1.25 or 1.6 Hz, having resulted frcm test table velocity limitations at low frequencies..These points are not considered to be significant, since input accelerations are comparatively low and rack amplification is essentially 1:1 at these frequencies.

Undertesting occurred in the vertical response at a single 12.5 Hz response point (TRS -

Right-to-Left and Vertical), and in the horizontal response at two 20 Hz response points (TRS Back-to-Front and Vertical; TRS -

Front-to-Back and Vertical).

The latter deficiencies resulted from difficulty in producing the desired test table response at 20 Hz during the testing of Nest No.

2 (Refer to Section III.F.5.a.).

Overall, the TRS's obtained in testing of the 2Al-13V module from current production are considered to constitute a successful result with respect to the.objective of enveloping the target GENERIC REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRA FOE QUALIFICATION OF RACK-MOUNTED MODULES.

Peference QOAAA20, Parts 1 and 2, Seismic Test Reports.

THE FOXBORO COMPANY QOAAB13 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 11 TYPE TEST REPORT PEV A III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

seismic Vibration Effects (Continued)

5.

Test ResultsJ Seismic PesponseL 1% damped Test Response Spectra are plotted below at one-third octave intervals for each of the four SSE tests, as obtained at the module mounting location (see dots).

GENERIC REQUIRED RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR QUALIFICATION OF BACK-MOUNTED MODULES are also shown on the same plots (solid line) to permit a direct comparison of the two plots.

a.

Current Production Module Front-to-Backgertical Plane 10 FEEQUE (a)m01 FET ~

C u

0 F

t RpVt ep e10 rUKjr.I Front-to-Back Response Vertical Response

QOiAB1 3 THE FOXBORO COMPANY

-PAGE 12 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABOPATORY REV A TYPE TEST REPORT II.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic VibrationEffects (Continued)

5.

Tst RsuisA5&S~i Re~n~L(Continued)

a.

Current-Production Module (Continued)

TFS 7_Back_-to-:Front~fjia Pln Back-to-Front

~

RepneVriclPsc

_____t-.ef Response---------

THE FOXBORO COMPANY QOAkB13 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 13 TYPE TEST REPORT REV A III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic Vibration Effects (Continued)

5.

Test ResultsJSeismic Reson se[ (Continued)

a.

Current Production Module (Continued)

TRS

- jeft-to-Right Vertical Plane ir~

i ait re

0 a

D Left-to-Right Response Vertical Pesponse Kb.

NaturallLAged Module TRS -

Front-to-Back/Vertical Plane I0 10 I1c M)

I Front-to-Back Response Vertical

QOAAB13 THE FOXBORO COMPANY PAGE 14 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY REV A

TYPE TEST EEFORT III.

SUMMARY

OF TPST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic Vibration Effects (Continued)

5.

Test Results (Seismic Pespon se (Continued)

b.

Naturall Aged Module (Continued)

TRS -

Back-to-FrontLVertical Plane 1

1 uuW tac' 10CM10 Back-to-Front Response Vertical Response TES_

Rjght-to-LeftfVertical Plane

-~~~-

T~L

~

2 W

10F R

T.

P 1

1 fWall' 100 Pit t-to-Le

'e'onse Vertical Pespcnse

THE FOXBORO COMPANY QOAAB13 COPPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 15 TYPE TEST REPORT REV A III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic Vibration Effects (Continued)

5.

Test Results_ JSeismic Responsej (Continued)

b.

NaturallIAyed Module (Continued)

TRS Left-to-Rbjght/Vertical Plare 44-Left-to-Right Response Vertical Pespcnse 0

Q04AB13 THE FOXBORO COMPANY PAGE 16 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY "REV A

TYPE TEST REPORT II.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seisc Vibation Effects (Continued)

6.

Note:

Measurement Equipment Accuracy during and after seismic tests vas 0.25 and 0.1%, respectively.

Target Acceptance Criteria:

The 2AO-V3I output will shift no more than +/-0.25% during seismic tests.

a.

Current Production Module

4. 5 OBE Tests Out-ut Shift_.of Span During Test

_ After-Test 50s%__o-__

L Plane of Section Section Section Section Section Section Vibratigg A

B A

B Front-to-Back

<0.25

<0.1

<0.1 Back-to-Front

<0.25

<0.1

<0.1 Left-to-Right

<0.25

<0.1

<0.1 ight-to-Left

<0.25

<0.1

2.

SSE Test Output Shift

% of Span Durig Test After Test

'50%

0%

100%

Plane of Section Section Section Section Section Section Vibration -

A B

Right-to-Left

<0.25

<0.1

<0.1 Left-to-Right

<0.25

<0.1

<0.1 Back-to-Front

<0.25

<0.1

<0.1 Front-to-Back

<0.25

<0.1

THE FOXBORO COMPANY Q0AAB13 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 17 TYPE TEST REPORT REV A III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

F.

Seismic Vibration Effects (Continued)

6.

Test Results (Continued)

b.

NaturallyAged Module

1.

OBE Tests Output Shift. % of span Dulipg Test

_After Test 50%

0%

100 Plane of Section Section Section Section Section Section A

_B B

A B

Front-to-Back

<0.25

<0.1

<0.1 Back-to-Front

<0.25

<0.1

<0.1 Right-to-Left

<0.25

<0.1

<0.1 Left-to-Right

<0.25

<0.1

2.

SSE Test Output Shift

% of Span Durng Test After Test 50%100%

Plane of Section Section Section Section Section Section Vibration A

B A

B Left-to-Right

<0.25

<0.1

<0.1 Right-to-Left

<0.25

<0.25 (0.1

<0.1

<0.1 Back-to-Front

<0.25

<0.1

<0.1 Front-to-Back

<0.25

<0.1

7.

Module Mass and Center of Gravity Mass Height Width Depth Model lb S

in.

cm in.

cm 2Al-13V 0.80 365 4.4 11.0 1.0 2.5 1.0 2.5 Note:

Reference for height, vidth, and depth measurements vas the lover left rear of the front plate.

0

QJAAB13 THE FOXBORO CONPANY PAGE 18 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY REV C TYPE TEST REPORT III.

JgggMg 01 T BESULTS (Continued)

G.

L 2~

galibration Inforaggion 1891559&&

AlGerE f12

§.1ial LasEt.-2AL s 2ate_ D ue Environmental FR Chamber Blue Ms 366PCI AA-324 2/77 11/77 Voltage/Current Ref e rence Source PAR TC-100.2 157 7/76 1/78 DV9 Data Tech.'

350 A9644 4/77 10/77 Power Supply H-P*

60155C 1135101536 6/76 12/77 Dual Power Supply H-P 6227B 1146100880 2/76 8/77 Environmental TR-40 Chamber Tenney' 100250 7397 5/77 2/78 Storage Oscilloscope H-P 184A 1316100705 1/77 10/77 Precision dc Current Source EDC' 0 CE-100 4717 4/77 10/77 Precision dc Current Source EDC CR-100 4852 7/77 1/78 0

b.

Naturally ged module Calibration Information lastrument glanufactur er fd e gerial Last Date pate Due Automatic Test System H-P AT-2*

Environmental TTUFR Chamber Tenney 40240 4709 11/77 8/78 Precision dc Voltage Source BDC NV-100N 3968 9/77 3/78 Voltage Source EDC KV100 3113 4/78 11/78

Note:

"AT-2" is an automatic test and data reduction system using an B-P 9825A Desktop Computer. Calibration of the system equipment is checked with a portable standard (EDC Preci sion Voltage source serial surber 3113 listed above) at the time of test.

A complete listing of equipment and capa bilities are available from The Foxboro Company.

sBlue M Electric Company

'Princeton Applied Research

?Data Technology Corporation

ewlett-Packard Company

Tenney Engineering Company soElectronic Development Company

je THE FOXBORO COMPANY QOAAB13 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PAGE 19 IYPE TEST REPORT REV C III*

lL (Continued)

G.

JSj.SEfl& (Continued)

2.

Post-S.j~smic

a. Qqkged Prod314982P 212 CalAbLajjie Inforpatign Instrument JRagulacturer j&del Iffli11 ai~ltgAL Dat.e pu Automatic Test System H-P N/A AT-2*

N/A N/A Invironmental TTUFR Chamber Tenney 40240 4709 11/77 5/78 Function Generator B-P 3310A 1151A07203 9/77 6/78 DVI Data Tech.

350 18222 2/78 9/78 Power Supply Lambda"t LCD-4-33 C87458 N/A N/A Storage Oscilloscope Tektronix' 2 564 7413 2/78 8/78 Voltage Source ED, 8V100 3113 4/78 11/78 b*

I-al-rillI Aged godulI Calbrtjion Inforpation Instrum A Unufac.t~iti Mode kzd LastDaL.DtePu Automatic Test System H-P AT-2*

Environmental Chamber Blue M FR366PCX AA-310 5/78 11/78 Precision Current Source EDC CR-100 4718 5/78 11/78 Precision Current Source EDZ CR-100 4857 8/78 2/79 Storage Oscilloscope B-P 184A 1316A00705 8/78 5/79 Voltage Source BDC 8V100 3113 4/78 11/78

Note:

"AT-21S is an automatic test and data reduction system using an N-P 9825A Desktop Computer. Calibration of the system equipment is checked with a portable standard (EDC Preci sion Voltage Source serial number 3113 listed above) at the time of test., & complete listing of equipment and capa bilities are available from The Foxboro Company.

"Lambda Electronics, Division of VEECO Instruments, Incorporated 1 aTektronix, Incorporated

.QO AB13 THE FOXBOPC COMPANY PAG-20 CORPORATE QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY REY A TYPE TEST REPORT III.

SUMMARY

OF TEST RESULTS (Continued)

G.

Test Equipment (Continued)

3.

Seismic

a.

Current Production Module Calibration Information Instrument Manufacturer Model Serial Last Date Date Due Power Supply H-P 60155C 1135A01536 6/76 1/78 Current Source EDC CR100 4851 7/77 2/78 DVM Data Tech.

350 18611 1/78 7/78 Recorder H-P 7414A 1244A00932 12/77 9/78

b.

Naturally Aged Module Calibration Information Instrument ganufacturer godel Serial Last Date Date Due Power Supply H-P 60155C 1135A01505 3/78 9/79 Current Source Foxboro' 3 386 N/A N/A N/A DVM Data Tech.

350 1864 4/78 10/78 Recorder H-P 7702B 1102A01250 5/78 11/78 boro Company

ML13311A278

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML13311A278

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search