ML13304B070

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Info Re Nuclear Plant Licensing Process & Status of Facility Licensing,In Response to Chamber of Commerce 810507 Resolution.Resolution Supporting Facility Licensing Encl
ML13304B070
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  
Issue date: 07/06/1981
From: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Randy Erickson
Hi-Desert Water Company, Twentynine Palms, CA, Water District
References
NUDOCS 8107090483
Download: ML13304B070 (3)


Text

DISTRIBUTION:

LPDR PDR w/cy of incoming)

NSIC TERA LB#3 Files HDenton ECase DEisenhut RTedesco FMiraglia HRood JLee (w/cy of incoming)

NHughes (w/cy of incoming)

SCavanaugh (NRR 3 7

LBerry PPAS SHanauer RMattson TMurley RVollmer BSnyder 8107090483 810706 PDR ADOCK 05000361 H

PDR OFFICE..

S URN AME D

AE...

DATE

JUL 6 18 Richard H. Erickson, President Board of Directors Twentynine Palms Water District c/o Hi-Desert Water Company 6955 Old Woman Springs Road Yucca Valley, California 92284

Dear President Erickson:

The May 7, 1981 resolution (No.

343) of the Board of Directors of the 29 Palms Water District, supporting the licensing of the San Onotre 2 and 3 nuclear power plants has been referred to me for reply. I am pleased to provide the following information regarding nuclear power plant licensing in general, and licensing of San Onofre 2 and 3 in particular.

Currently, the overall picture is one of a licensing process that is roturning to predictability at a considerably enhanced level of safety.

However, the implementation of this enhanced level of safety has raised a number of potential new issues in the contested hearings for both operating licenses and construction permits around the country. Some of these units were substantially complete at the time of the Three Mile Island accident or have been colapleted since then.

However, we are confident the actions we have taken since TWI 2 and those we will take will provide major improvements in licensing schedules without compromising the regulatory requirenents for safety.

With regard to licensing of Sai Onofre Units 2 and 3, the staff has completed the major part of its review.

Staff safety evaluations were issued on December 31, 1980, February 6, 1981, February 25,

1981, and May 8, 1981.

The review of the San Onofre Units 2 and 3 by the Advisory Commiittee on Reactor Safeguards was completed on March 12, 1981.

The Final Environmental Statement was issued by the NIRC staff in April, 1981.

The hearing on this project commenced on June 22, 1981.

We appreciate your interest in the San Onofre project.

Please be assured that the NRC is taking every reasonable action to expedite the licensing process, consistent with our comnitment to ensure the public health and safety.

Sincerely Original signed by Darrell G. Eisenhut Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION:

SAE NEXT PAGE.

fE.DTL:L...B3 D

7D

/L DLR OFFICE SURNAME

.HRood:jb FJ lia RLT esco D Zslhut I

S A T E j NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 1981-335-960

FTLS:

E-E ThE DUE DE I!,"A I EL If the due date does not allow adequate tme to respond to this ticket, you MEy reqCuest a revised due date.- The request must include vxaTid justification and be submitted through your correspondence coordinator to the NRR

'mail room. Such requests for green tickets must be made within 3 days after assignment.

IRequests for revision of yellow ticket due dates may be made, with justification,

,th rough the weekly WITS update.

The revised due date, if approved by PPAS, ill be used to track division corresper tis on schedules.