ML13303A762

Summary of 791119 & 20 Meeting W/Util in San Onofre,Ca Re Review of Bases for Const Schedule

ML13303A762
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	01/21/1980
From:	Rood H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8002200071
Download: ML13303A762 (24)

Text

Meeting Summary

/Docket File T. Murphy NRC PDR J. Knight Local POR S. Hanauer TIC R. Tedesco NRR Reading R. Bosnak LWR #2 File S. Pawlicki E. Case F. Schauer D. F. Ross K. Kniel D. B. Vassallo T. Novak S. A. Varga Z. Rosztoczy D. Skovholt W. Butler W. Gammill V. Benaroya J. Stolz R. Satterfield R. Baer V. Moore

0. Parr M. Ernst L. Rubenstein F. Rosa C. Heltemes R. P. Denise W. Haass EP Branch Chief R. Houston G. Chipman L. Crocker J. Collins F. J. Williams W. Kreger R. J. Mattson G. Lear R. DeYoung B. Youngblood Project Manager - H. Rood L. Hulman Attorney, ELD -

L. Chandler NRC

Participants:

J. Lee S. Boyd IE(3)

L. Lanier ACRS(16)

W. Lovelace J. Rothfleisch T. Abell G. Matthews L. Schaub

~o 00~7/

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 JAN 21 1980 DOCKET NO. 50-361, APPLICANTS:

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FACILITY:

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT 2

SUMMARY

OF CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL VISIT TO SAN ONOFRE, UNIT 2 On November t9, 1979, members of the NRC staff (the Caseload Forecast Panel) met with the applicants at the San Onofre site to review the bases for the Unit 2 construction schedule. Attendees at the meeting are given in Enclosure 1.

The meeting agenda and the information presented by the applicants at the meeting are given in Enclosure 2.

The applicants described the plant construction status and schedule, and the startup testing program. As of November 1, 1979, Unit 2 plus common areas were 85% complete, based on manpower expended. Major construction schedule Milestones for Unit 2 are as follows:

NRC construction permit issued 10/73 State Coastal Commission permit issued 2/74 Site preparation started 3/74 Structural concrete started 10/74 Set reactor pressure vessel 4/77 Cold hydrostatic test of RCS 6/80 Load Fuel 11/80 After touring the plant and conducting additional discussions with the applicants, the staff panel concluded that, in its opinion, San Onofre, Unit 2 would be ready to load fuel between February and July of 1981, with May 1981 as the most likely date. This estimate is based on the following considerations:

1. The plant is several months away from being 90% complete. Our experience is that plants at the 90% point are about a year from fuel loading.

2. The preoperational test program schedule outlined by the applicants appears to be optimistically short.

JAN

3. Other plants recently visited by the Caseload Forecast Panel that are 85 to 90% complete seem to be nearer to completion than San Onofre 2.

Harry Rood LWR Branch No. 2 Division of Project Management

Enclosures:

1. List of Attendees

2. Info. Presentation by Applicant ccs w/enclosures:

See next pages

Mr. James H. Drake JAN2 1980 Vice President Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue P. 0. Box 800 Rosemead, California Mr. B. W. Gilman Senior Vice President -

Operations ISan Diego Gas and Electric Company 101 Ash Street P. 0. Box 1831 San Diego, California 92112 cc:

Charles R. Kocher, Esq.

James A. Beoletto, Esq.

Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue P. 0. Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Chickering and Gregory ATTN: David R. Pigott, Esq.

Counsel for San Diego Gas

& Electric Company and Southern California Edison Company Three Embarcadero Center, 23rd Floor San Francisco, California 94112 Mr. Kenneth E. Carr City Manager City of San Clemente 100 Avenido Presidio San Clemente, California 92672 Alan R. Watts, Esq.

Rourke & Woodruff 1055 North Main Street Suite 1020 Santa Ana, California 92701 Lawrence Q. Garcia, Esq.

California Public Utilities Commission 5066 State Building San Francisco, California 94102

Mr.

James H. Drake JAN 1980 Mr. B. W. Gilman cc:.. Mr. R. W. DeVane, Jr.

CombustionEngineering, Inc.

1000 Prospect Hill Road Windsor, Connecticut 06095 Mr. P. Dragolovich Bechtel Power Corporation P. 0. Box 60860, Terminal Annex Los Angeles, California 90060 Mr. Mark Medford.

Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue P. 0. Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Henry Peters San Diego Gas & Electric Company Post Office Box 1831 San Diego, California 92112 Ms.

Lyn Harris Hicks Advocate for GUARD 3908 Calle Ariana San Clemente, California 92672 Richard J. Wharton, Esq.

Warton and Pogalies 2667 Camino Del Rio South Suite 106 San Diego, California 92108 Phyllis M. Gallagher, Esq.

1695 West Crescent Avenue Suite 222 Anaheim, California 92701 Mr. A. S. Carstens 2071 Caminito Circulo Norte Mt.

La Jolla, California 92037 Resident Inspector/San Onofre Nuclear Power Station c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0. Box 3550 San Onofre, California 92672

ENCL 9 URE 1 ATTENDEES San Onofre 2/3 Caseload Forecast Panel Meeting 11/19/79 and 11/20/79 Name Organization H. Rood NRC-DPM S. Boyd NRC-MPA L. Lanier NRC-MPA W. Lovelace NRC-MPA R. Pate NRC-Resident Inspector R. Baer NRC-DPM D, Hoffman SCE H. Ray SCE-Project Mgr.

H. Peters SDG&E T. D. Mercurio SCE B. Katz SCE W. Schwab SCE Startup W. Petro SCE-Asst. Proj. Mgr.

D. Schone SCE-Lead Engrg Site Rep.

D. P. McFarlane SCE-Cost/Schedule Supr.

D.R. Bauern SCE-SU Cost/Sched.

G. A. Chavez SCE-Startup Supr.

K. G. Hess BPC-Project Startup Engineer R.S. Neal BPC-Startup Scheduling Supv.

P.A. Portanova SCE-Startup Supv.

H.S. Leasure SCE-Constr. Mgmt.

D.F. Martin SCE-PE

CLOSURE 2 SAN ONOFRE UNIT 2 P1RESENT'ION FO NRC CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL NOVEMBER 19, 1979 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

AGENDA NOVEMBER 19, 1979 9:00 A.M.

I PROJECT SCHEDULE OVERVIEW -

Bill Petro TI ENG I1N:E RNG AND PPJXROUREME17NT STA "I":

onShn III CONSTRUCTION STATUS -

Doug McFarlane IV STARTUP STATUS -

Dennis Bauern V

TMI CONSIDERATIONS -

Harold Ray VI LUNCH (11:15)

VII SITE TOUR (1:15)

Bill

Schwab, Dennis Hoffman 2

PROJECT SCHEDULE OVERVIEW GENERAL STATUS:

ENGINEERING 95+

PROCUREMENT 98+

CONSTRUCTION 85 STARTUP 12 SYSTEM TURNOVER ON SCHEDULE BULK TO SYSTEM CONCEPT AUGUST, 1979 STARTUP LOGIC CONTROLLING ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION PRIORITIZED BY SYSTEM TURNOVER SCHEDULE 3

PROJECT SCHEDULE OVERVIEW (CONT.)

MANPOWER:

BECHTEL MANUAL 3,400 BECHTEL NON-MANUAL 900 SUBCONTRACTORS 200 EDISON CONSTRUCTION 183 EDISON STARTUP 206 EXTENDED SHIFT WORK (48 HOURS)

SELECTED OVERTIME (SATURDAY, SUNDAY)

INCREASED PTPE FITTERS to 1,400 PREPARING FOR 24-HOUR SHIFT WORK, IF NECESSARY 4

SONGS 2&3 NOV. 1979 ENCGINI:PING h PROCUREMENT S T A T U S A)

ENGINEERING DESIGN (UNITS 2&3 AS OF OCTOBER 21, 1979) o MECHANICAL....

.................... 93% COMPLETL o

PLANT DESIGN....

.................. 99%

o ELECTRICAL...

......................96%

o CONTROL SYSTEM...

.................. 94%

o PIPE SUPPORTS......................77%

COMMENTS

1.

UNIT 2 AND COMMON % DESIGN COMPLETE IS NOT TRACKED SEPARATELY.

HOWEVER, NO DESIGN ITEM WILL ADVERSELY AFFECT THE NOVEMBER, 1980 FUEL LOAD SCHEDULE.

• 2.

FOR PIPE SUPPORT DESIGN, THE PRESENT WORK FORCE IS AT 200 PEOPLE PLUS 15% OVERTIME.

ALL PIPE SUPPORT DESTIN WORK ON UNIT 2 AND COMMON WILL BE COMPLETE BY MARCH, 1980, AND IS AT PRESENT 90% COMPLETE.

3.

ENGINEERING SUPPORT TO DISPOSITION ITEMS SUCH AS OPEN NCRs IS NOT IMPACTING CONSTRUCTION TURNOVERS TO STARTUP 5

SONGS 2&3 NOV.

1979 B)

PROCUREMENT (UNIT 2 & COMMON) o MAJOR EQUIPMENT DELIVERIES........ON SCHEDULE o

LARGE PIPE SPOOLS.................10,286 of 10,375 ON SITE (99-)

o LARGE PIPE SUPPORTS...............10,400 of 11,550 ON SITE (90%)

o.

MAJOR VALVES..................... 99% ON SITE

a.

UNIT 2 & COMMON...............LAST 6 TO BE SHIPPED BY END OF 1979

b.

UNIT 3......

10 MORE REQUIRED ON SCHEDULE

%IOMM EN'TS

1.

THE FOLLOWING EXAMPLES ARE TYPICAL OF THE EQUIPMENT REMAINING TO BE DELIVERED:

BPC

a.

UNIT AUX TRANSFORMER..........ON SITE DECEMBER 10, 1979

b.

SUPPORT BEAMS FOR SPENT.......ON SCHEDULE, SHIPPED FUEL RACKS CE

c.

MISC. INSTRUMENTATION.........ON SITE JANUARY, 1980 SUCH AS MOVABLE AND FTXED INCORE.DETECTORS

d.

CONTROL ELEMENT ASSEMBLY......ON SITE NEXT MONTH (91)

GEC

e.

RETURN OF TURBINE.............JANUARY, 1980 GENERATOR EXCITER

2.

NO PROCUREMENT ITEM IS ANTICIPATED TO IMPACT A NOVEMBER, 1980 FUEL LOAD SCHEDULE.

6

Data TI'*October 1979 UN IT 2 LARGE PIPE TOTAL TO DATE QTY.

R _Q -D SCH.

ACT.

TO GO OTY.

%C0!PL.

STATUS 10,375 10,183 10,137 238 98 N/A (SPOOLS)

____ORECAST INSTALL 10,000 ACTUA4 INSTALL 0

,0 8,000 l

I-j 000O J FM AM J JA S0N.DJ FM AMJ JA SO0N D 1979 1980 7

Data Thru October 1979 UNI [ 112 LARGE PIPE HANGERS (COMPLETES)

TOTAL TO DATE QTY.

R[Q'D SCH.

ACT.

TO GO QTY.

% COMPL.

STATUS 11,550 9,010 9,065 2435 79 12,000.

-1 I0 10,000

/

FORECAST INSTALL 8,000 uLJ ACTUAL INSTALL 6,000 4,C0 J FMAM J

J AS 0

NDJ FMAM J

J AS 0

ND 1979 1980 8

. ata Thru October 1979 UNIT #2 SMALL PIPE TOTAL TO DATE QTY.

REQ'D SCH.

ACT.

TO GO QTY.

% COMPL.

STATUS 135 126 123 12 92 N/A (1,OOOLF) 140,000 FORECAST INSTALL 120,000 100,000 ACTUAL NSTAL 80,000

.:7 77 3.___

60,000 F MA M J J AS 0 N DJ FMA M J J AS 0 ND 1979 1980 9

• Data Thru October 1979 UNIT #2 S1ALL PIPE SUPPORTS (COTPLES TOTAL TO DATE QTY.

REQ'D SCH.

ACT.

TO GO QTY.

% COMPL.

STATUS 20,600 15,180 14,825 5775 72 22,000 20,000 0

.7 FORECAST IN$TALL_

12,000 ACTUAL INST LL..:

81000 FM M

JA ODM M

ASON 0

J

-jF M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J -,A

--S 0 N

.-- D 1979 1980 10

.ta t[hru October J 979 UNIT #'t & COMION CONDUIT TOTAL TO DATE QTY.

REQ'D SCH.

ACT.

TO GO qTY.

% COMPL.

STATUS 366 334 319 47 87

-4 wks

(,OOOLF) 400 FOR CAST INSTALL 300.

4--

20-(

AC FUAL :i N SALL C>200 100 J

F MA M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D 1979 1980 11

Dat hru October 1979 UNIT #2 WIRE & CABLE TOTAL TO DATE QTY.

REQ'D SCH.

ACT.

TO GO QTY.

% COMPL.

STATUS 5,009 4,167 4,041 968 81

-2 wks 6,000 5,000:~-

r-r ACUA INSTALL 6-

-7 7

2,000--

J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D 1979 1980 12

Data Thru October 1979 UNIT 1/2 CONNECT] ONS TOTAL TO DATE QTY.

REQ'D SCH.

ACT.

TO GO QTY.

% COMPL.

STATUS 130 84.5 79.1 50.9 61

-2 wks

(,OOOEA) 140 120 FORECAST INSTALL 100--

0 80 0

fACTUAL INSTALL~ i~1i...

40

~

1 -- _______

.I j4 1

20 -

1 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F MAM J J A S 0 N D 1979 1980 13

STARTUP STATUS I.

MASTER STARTUP SCHEDULE A.

STARTUP TESTING HAS BEGUN ON 210 OF THE 241 SYSTEMS FOR UNIT 2.

B.

TESTING IS AHEAD OF SCHEDULE FOR ALL ZERO FLOAT SYSTEMS.

DAA CIRCULATING WATER SYSTEM EPA SALT WATER COOLING SYSTEM EGA COMPONENT COOLING WATER SYSTEM 131A CONT,'ATNMI NT SPRAY SYSTFM BBA REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM C.

EIGHTY-SEVEN (87) SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN TURNED OVER TO STARTUP OF THE 241 TOTAL.

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS -

20 OF 134 TURNED OVER.

DESIGNATOR SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

• KCB FIRE PROTECTION HALON

• KBA CRITICAL COMPRESSED AIR

• EAA SERVICE WATER

• ANA DEMINERALIZER WATER MAKEUP

• KAA SERVICE AIR

• LGA SEWAGE TREATMENT

• KHA SERVICE GAS N 2

• APA CONDENSATE TRANSFER & STORAGE HEA PRIMARY PLANT MAKEUP GWA CONTINUOUS EXHAUST (PARTIAL) 14

DES IGNATOR SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

• GLG BATTERY HVAC NORMAL

• KDA DOMESTIC WATER.

GLH EMERGENCY CHILLER HVAC

• EFB NUCLEAR SERVICE H 2 0 TANK

• KLA SERVICE GAS H 2 EBA TURBINE PLANT COOLING H 2 0 (PARTIAL)

EFA NUCLEAR SERVICE H 2 0 DAA CIRC. H 2 0 JAA BOILER FUEL OIL CFA LUBE OTTL STOPAGE & TRANSFER (PARTIAL)

• OPERATIONAL ELECTRICAL OR I AND C -

67 OF 107 TURNED OVER.

D.

OF THE 53 SWITCHGEAR, LOAD CENTERS, OR MCC'S, 46 HAVE BEEN ENERGIZED WITH PERMANENT POWER.

E.

SCHEDULE BASE STARTUP ACTIVITIES ARE BASED ON ONE TO THREE SHIFTS DEPENDING ON THE ACTIVITY.

THE FIRST CUT AT DURATIONS AND LOGIC WAS BASED ON TEST ENGINEERS' EXPERIENCE AND REVIEW OF SIMILAR PLANTS.

SINCE THEN FURTHER REFINEMENT HAS TAKEN PLACE TO REFLECT OUR TEST PROCEDURE REQUIREMENTS.

15

STARTUP STATUS REPORT/CURVES A.

OF THE 11,000 ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS FOR UNIT 2, 6,600 HAVE BEEN TURNED OVER TO STARTUP VERSUS 7,200 SCHEDULED AND 5,500 HAVE BEEN TESTED VERSUS 6,100 SCHEDULED.

B.

OF THE 10,500 I AND C COMPONENTS FOR UNIT 2, 5,500 HAVE BEEN TURNED OVER TO STARTUP VERSUS 3,700 SCHEDULED AND 3,800 HAVE BEEN CALIBRATED VERSUS 2,200 SCHEDULED.

C.

OF THE 241 SYSTFMS FOR UNI 2

87 HAVE BEEN TURNED OVER TO STARTUP VERSUS 84 SCHEDULED.

D.

PREREQUISITE TESTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED ON 57 SYSTEMS VERSUS 62 SCHEDULED,AND PREOPERATIONAL OR ACCEPTANCE TESTING HAS BEGUN ON 2 SYSTEMS.

16

SCNGS 2 AND CCMMON WEEKLY STATUS AS OF 11/8/79 Activities CO-plete Scheduled Actual Cumulation Total

% Complete TO Date To Date Status Req.

A/B Sched.

Electrical Component T/O 7188 6577 B

611 11,000 60 Electrical COmponent Tests 6096 5482 B

614 11,000 50 I&C Component T/O 3735 5513 A

1778 10,500 53 I&C Component Tests 2217 3773 A

155E 10,500 36 Mech. Syst. T/O (Node 3) 18 20 A

2 134 15 Elect. Syst. T/O (Node 3) 66 67 A

107 63 System Prereq. (Node 40) 62 57 B

5 241 24 System Preop/Acct. (Node 52) 129

-0 A-Ahead/B-Behind

• Only 129 of 241 systems have preop./acceptance tests.

.TIlLT PROCEDURE DRAFT PREPARATION STATUS SCHED.

ACTUAL TOTAL PREREQ. & STATION 575 823 1,110 PREOP/ACCEPTANCE/P. ASCEN.

270 269 402 1'.

STARTUP MANPOWER e

BPC -

106 SCE -

206 e

A SECOND SHIFT HAS BEEN ADDED.

UNIT 3 MANPOWER MAY BE USED ON UNIT 2.

1 AUGRESSIVyE STARTUP ATTITUDEi EARLY BUILDUP OF STARTUP MANNING.

EARLY TESTING OF ELECTRICAL & I&C COMPONENTS.

EARLY MECHANICAL COMPONENT TESTING.

EARLY REVIEW OF VENDOR BLACK BOXES.

STARTUP HELPED WITH CONSTRUCTION PLANNING.

STARTUP HAS APPROVED DELAYS IN TURNOVER FOR ONLY TWO SYSTEMS.

18