NL-13-1236, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 13 of 14

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML13211A252)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 13 of 14
ML13211A252
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/25/2013
From:
Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-13-1236 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 2.0
Download: ML13211A252 (45)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: & N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2!- i zi- u :- oi Equip. Class"2e), -

al%, C-a,4r-a Vonets n _: ;--e Ezquipmen~lt escgIIJLU pto a ..

Q I-, 1,'A Location:

Bldg. ( Floor El. zoo'-c)" Room, Area P- \ b Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

SLO.. 6see. s -11A-M 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE E-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YEI NEI 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild su ce YEI NEI oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the con ete near the anchors? YE NEI 5. Is the anchorage configuration consiste with plant documentation?

YE- NEI (Note: This question only applies if t item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration v rification is required.)

UE[ N/AE U[] N/AE1 UE1 N/AE UE1 N/AEl 6. Based on the above potentially adverse tge evaluations, is the anchorage free of conditions?

YE NEI U["]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

SC-3 >Page 173 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- 1 92l -LA 3- ool Equip. Class 1 2 7.o- 1,4r ..... aoj P2in Equipment Description SF SePon.-r /3mr-d i'i.a.. 1 Interaction Effects (S ee w. dSWC 8 /C' ..41/4)7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[I N/AE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighti , YE NEI UE N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment 9 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid mage? YEI NEI UEi N/AEI 10. Based on the above seismic interacti evaluations, is equipment free YE-- NEI UE-of potentially adverse seismic mt ction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YW NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

A vi-,v. 41- j,4ap-t ,l Covpo.n@-A c*PJ~)tY~c Ss;%c..r ro-,-4t. pY% i.. 4.mA.. sw..U YW;a i.C,4&S Cif COCUwr.,,4e 4 oJds 0 ', 11 , ei C*rAs e ei- f S 0a.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

$ e'rc V"r~o-..n IJCssv Wr-40r 9 A60 vv'.r'rJc oy% k,-&L $4WV r 04 Xoo e 04 o4 par%*\ 1bO~'.Ow.-6 J00 NOlae ' )'A.'D.1 o", -0. 00;;Ovn 04. kN.W seW...dý claw 04. 3 A n.a O wo. .C a".'hm )0&4ý' d0AYV 4 61- SAhJ k&cav- -LVVL k.Se Ce a;-ivioi-.

do0 *w'ok Yep"r..de..

CIL %e1V" Evaluated by:"- ".3os. 2. R 4 d. Date: 2/12/1i< C-4 >Page 174 of 231 9TTACI-IMFNT 7 5qF=ISMI(l WAI KnrOwN rGHF-rlI IqTSq NO qN(VnRl-RPT-O29 VF=R.(ION#

vage i A -I"r ArT 7.age 1 fb 01 A TT Tr7.A~~~k nT Tn.U-age 1 (( ol ATTr IT "7.-IAIA I 11lfPI I\ Inal DDTE3E ki 1) n age 1 I WALKDOWN CHECKLISN NO. SNCV061-RPT VERSION 2.0 P11-07 ý If II l I Page 179 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, 2nd door in the back I I -KilhI page AT lMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VER 9 2.0 Page 182 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: @) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-2q'03- Ps- Dc I Equip.Class1 2 20- 1n,4.,,n,,n, an,.J C-on4rl Panels Equipment Description 3G& \A IEN C7TL PNL Location:

Bldg. Z. &- Floor El. 2.zo'-o" Room, Area N,. \o0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane ( See- SuWC. 8A~e4 9105s/12')

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item, of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose har are?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than *Id surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in e concrete near the ancho YO NEI YE] NEI UE] N/AZ YE-] NEI U[ N/AE YE NE U[-- N/A[Y[-E NE UE] N/AE Y[ NEI U[rs?5. Is the anchorage configuration co/sistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only appli$ if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above potentially adverse age evaluations, is the anchorage free of conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

P< C-3 >Page 183 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. z-2. Y01- PS- 1I& I Equip. Class" 2 ,,,,.alion OnJ Cofro1 Pf 1.--Equipment Description 03& 1A GE N C7L. PPJL Interaction Effects (se-- $toC d,4c j RIb5/Iz')7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lightj and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipme9.N/AD 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to free pf, Y[:] NDI U-" N/AD YD- ND] UD1 N/AD Y[-- NEI UD 10. Based on the above seismic int of potentially adverse seismic)effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEL NDI UD-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? a\ ;rcvbt- ;an 4 0,3,- , jtMfl,,

t',e 10OX/A cco pn,,,,.-,ioore o4.,,-r, ,.o;,-o. "or%,n.c4.nS Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

W) o'ie.Evaluated by: Date: ot II .1/oi1a< C-4 >Page 184 of 231

ATr 7. C 4, age A TT 7.:!Tr i-age ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.2- 150 I-Al2-OO-ojo Equip. Class 1 2 I1- VI,- 1_-lA le -s Equipment Description C-TA I'ool;,, I r-% -Location:

Bldg. u -L CTtA Floor El. 9-o" Room, Area Vt.oI Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO NX 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Ypq NEI U- N/AD Yo NEI UL N/AUl YOI NEI UL N/AZI YE NEI UI N/Az&YX NO UO 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >-Page 188 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-15 ol -S71- 00I-Oo- Equip. Class'2 10- 4 N4 led1Jrs Equipment Description C.1T3 Cool;,na I ,n:' -Mn4vo Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX N[: U0 N/A[I YN NEI UE N/AE YN NEI UE- N/AE Y'. NEl U--Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y¥ N[] UI-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

M w) .Evaluated by: /&, 4-"/'-o- ZS.. ýA eV r n e.- r-Date: 3 Z17.. /13 1'ý -ý.I Z 6.ý czS"C 4 A P< C-4 >Page 189 of 231 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIOt QT 7-)"OWN (D. SNCV061 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- 9V- rtq'z , Equip. Class 1 2 R-Sr Se,,,=; -Qp,=4d ualve.s Equipment Description R.ey4.0 o- Agac L&.Jrta L;ne. Cp%4ral 5OV Location:

Bldg. Ljr C..8 Floor El. iv,-o" Room, Area M 21t)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YE] NEI U-- N/A-r ý) ; 6 oG.v tn-i n n.ro,-A,, , *ap,'e, I ,4yier t4r. , 01nc*or O n C t: 1c, 60cs. M~v 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UE] N/A%oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI] UE N/AX 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NEI UE] N/Az (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yb NEI UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Page 192 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

2- HV-o'qq42 A Equip. Class 12SF-+ioo.Ow._

e,,a j .Selcyloid-Op,,lr4ai V"als Equipment Description 2,c,,4or We,., Le4eir-,, Li.n Cnn4rol SOV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI U-- N/AD YX NEI UD N/AD YX NEI U- N/AD YX NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yp NDI UD" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

No~e/ , Evaluated by: ./-,. i 'Q, .1-1 A V ý .JP- 7 I Zi5sTVJ .ý CMA CON Date: 7-I/ I 3 Z /13 4 C-4 >Page 193 of 231

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. "2- H4V- 0 It' tB Equip. Class 2%- -or-OperatiA S ,nc.d-ODr.,,,J kles E nn ent I-ecrintion 0 -. ..... ., A..,, U 1r., o I... .-....1.1 .....lA V..t...Location:

Bldg. LU2 C 15 Floor El. tS3'- o" Room, Area (1-b 10 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NM of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YE NE ur1 N/A[J"i'h~. 1 t- '%n a " ne-h rno,,J 4 Q-d Q-c.lipmre,,,/

,- , 4 ,% afCýo. h &h 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NEI UF N/A[K 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE ur- N/AJ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NEl U- N/A%Y9 NEI UF Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Page 195 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 2-WY- 4 Equip. Class12- 3_M oAo -r_ ,0Rn-.4el i &en,,;d-)Op,,.4e,-I Jod r Equipment Description e .... jaior ti. or.., N16-" ekzb-

\pJaku.Ae Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI UL1 N/AL YM N[l UL7 N/A[Yn NEI UL- N/AL YW NEI UF-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NEI U-L adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) me- 0 be- %\ t; ý Vjj ~r-U I-,a* ~¶A~c v e t~Date: 3/1 ?-./,1'<C-4 >Page 196 of 231 9 0TACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCVO61-RPT-02, VERSIONqV rage i AENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCVO61-RPT-02.

VERSION 9 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:Q N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- HV -1qlg Equip. Class2-lAbý,,-9o#,,,ArA J 5*I i o;l1d-2.,4.oJ V@'JV,,.Equipment Description FACCAW SupDI!S to .LtUS Cool r-, t"ov Location:

Bldg. W-. C-T.'j Floor El. 6lgW-oe Room, Area ¶t.%03 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE! NEI UE! N/ADQ YE! NE! ULD N/ARR YE- NE] UE] N/AIK YEI N! UE-] N/ADNEI UE1 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Page 199 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- UV- 19I1 Equip. Class" 2 I-1o~4or-Ope.L,4c.J j Seelenao -.o4,iar I Vol=-Equipment Description AIC-W supso-A. 4I RCP Cooer-s MOV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NEI UE- N/AEI YI NEI UE] N/AE Y. NEi UD] N/AEl YDQ NEI UE--Other Adverse Conditions Ii. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UEýadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N0voe.Evaluated by:/-/ -In~ !PP' (. 1 4 c yr% J r,*/j,.Date: 3,/1z/11 3 .I z I Z -Page 200 of 231 44V-19 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- HV-"';k P6, Equip. Class1 2 Pnurnoalc.-

Qpe.&/ed Vahsl,.Equipment Description No~rrl CiTt Pu,,e- S!uopl!. 1 , uaizg.i iDOV Location:

Bldg. tA2 C73 Floor El. 2zo&-o" Room, Area C. 1ol Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NM of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YE] NEI UE- N/AK 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YEI N[-E UE- N/AX 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI UE1 N/Aný 0C'A ~VC rt teC. Nt- &d-C1. -; Ch tC V 4 0r GV A~ flC1 ~l J~ P1[;(>yp 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NEI UE- N/ADJ Y NEI UE-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< Page 202 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- H y & 2 (.8 Equip. Class'1- Uo+t~ On..pJe~ UaIue2~Equipment Description , C-T/ PUrae_. ',U12PI..

Eal.,2al nj AOV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YP9 ND U0 N/AD Y14 NDI UD- N/AD Y[ ND-I UD- N/AD YE ND UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NDI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

W} one. -Evaluated by: / r ft.l, nd,,,-7 Date: 3 /1- /1-3 3 I /I r--/ ( 19'1= <(I. CAcOA4< C-4 )Page 203 of 231 9 pTAr'WfA9IKlT 7-91:ICMRI(' IA/Al VnnXflAI C-WlZC'tVI ICZTq fHV-262 6 6 CAPCS CBNORMAL PURGE SUPPLY mC MINI ISO AoV FC A Page 2U4 o0 0.,

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 6 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- 4V- 9-7 5 c. Equip. Class12 -_Mo4o-- Operat.ed f 5/enoicd-Opir&4fd Val&&Equipment Description Ac.curmulix4ov. " NWi-ýnr6&q

\/eyA-<Sele nac 0paerv4d \Jmlve_Location:

Bldg. U7 C-r Floor El. I%,&'-O" Room, Area Pt..1 t0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO NX 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NEI UE- N/AN YEI NEI UE N/AP9 YEI NEI U"] N/A[YEI NEI UE- N/AX YEý NEI UE-"2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 206 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- WV- '91 5C. Equip. Class" 2-- 4o -0 p.,4.-d t 5,eo;il-(tpr,*4.J Voal Equipment Description Ageurml8+o÷, N Ki4u-oa,,y Vewr- Selvnoid Ope,.a-..c Vaue.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yt& NEI UEI N/AD-YD!,NrI UEr N/AD-YX NEI UI- N/ADl Y0 NEI Ur-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YD NI- U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N ow' e-Evaluated by: /o -. o .t .,< C-4 >Page 207 of 231 Date: 1/12/1-4 I

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:()

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

2-L-T-0501 Equip. Class'2 I -'5i, 4-uv,, f,.KS Equipment Description S & 1 fltanb Levuc Location:

Bldg. tA._.c_-73 Floor El. is -o " Room, Area o Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YIE NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

3eyr cv-i, Q' G AUkO -00. L3 , Me., 12. O 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y19 N[] U[Z] N/AE YX NEI UE] N/A[]Y'q N[E U- N/AE Yo1 NEI U[I N/AE]YCR Nil UE-Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4 C-3 >Page 210 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

2- LT-05oI Equip. Class1 2 IJ?'1n54rum,,e,+

Rl~cks Equipment Description 5&1 Wiipse. 0 av.. Leve I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y*9 NI] U[:] N/Al]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YP NI" UE] N/AF]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yif NF-I Ur N/Al]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YX NEI UF'-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM N[-] U--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N o'n.e Evaluated by: I /Z/r-/ -c.S" o7 U ... ..1.Date: $/17-./ i ov E1. ~-; A 3 .z &ZIF1 P C-4 o Page 211 of 231 ATT7-It7' \AIAI r 4DDT age zL I 01 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (91 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. Z-511 -E-OI00o-o0 Equip. Class 1 2 10- .;r yandlers Equipment Description C TA o,, C,."J, Coo hin CoUL Location:

Bldg. U7 rILA Floor El. -zo&'-o" Room, Area i'kS9IQ Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YX NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN NEI U-- N/Afl YIq NE-- UE] N/AE3 YX NEI U[-W N/AZ Yq NE UEi N/AZ1 Yt NEI U[:]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Page 213 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 2-15ii-E'OOI-O0oo Equip. Class 1 2 O- ir Wancilers Equipment Description C "1 e. *Lo~, t pr Cav.'4u Coolhrig.

CoiL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y14 NEI UE- N/AE Y4 NEI UE' N/AE YE NEI UE N/AX YD NEI UFE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N one.Evaluated by: ._Date: 3.14/2i015 3&/ I. 1< C-4 >Page 214 of 231 9 0TACHN'T 7: OWN CI-NO. SNC W-t..........

M3 19 20 13 Page 216 of 231 9tACHN.0 NT 7: WN i?PT

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-13-1236,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._2.0,_Vogtle_Unit_2_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic._Part_13_of_14&oldid=892157"