NL-13-1236, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 11 of 14

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML13211A250)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 2.0, Vogtle Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 11 of 14
ML13211A250
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/25/2013
From:
Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-13-1236 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 2.0
Download: ML13211A250 (46)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 6) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2.- I 95-5"3-11BSC Equip. Class'i-Moýo, C r-,m4,\ C C.,.40o1)4o EauinmentDescrintion viroV Mol i li ZIGC .Location:

Bldg. C Floor El. v&,o' Room, Area fL~ A j, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage (See 5tL)C¢ JOL64 t 9116/1%)1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild su ace oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the co rete near the anchors?YO YO] NO U-1 N/AO YE NE U- N/AE YE- NEI U-] N/A[]YE-] NE UE] N/AE YO NEI Ur 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistft with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies iffie item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration erification is required.)
6. Based on the above potentially adverse, age evaluations, is the anchorage free of conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

-<C-3 >Page 81 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. L- I S'O 5- 5 -BC. Equip. Class-1 ,I,- C,,,4,.I .l -I- Caft4ee , , Equipment Description .rO V Moi , , r, C.4,- Z OAPC Interaction Effects (s c Jo 4ea /IIL'7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEr N ID N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and light" g, YEr NO U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipme 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to av damage? YE! Nr] Ur] N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic inte ton evaluations, is equipment free Y[-] N[-] Ur: of potentially adverse seismi nteraction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YK NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

A vw,,at 'sfPec4I.o o, 4Y-.. C,,, P o,, 5.tok %Dl *4 I U.cJ 3,0o.m V* r.../~ 4" c'n0.c.4'4'qVCWLSo~i.

I o.C.IO'.,V

&$W 1o *Aver'-..

">i'm.c Cov,,.ions' t.,,,e fou,,2. Soew ,..,,; , iLtr.. ng docuwornwiic

-,-ovJ .Ll &. A ct I' " Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)-Or*- vl &W,- .W'A' ,, h:i, 40i4 i ..o cc-ZZ.'6,, .wl;* ta,4,- oht rpe,- ~?,, t I,,J-;%1&-

6".Evaluated by: .-. .- / -3T, o ' .. h 4 e, fLd -14c r, z. Date: 3,/zz../ I 4 C-4>Page 82 of 231 9 ACHMENT 7- SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO SNCV061 rage oa O0 T3 i 9TJ'N 9 0 A TTACLJLAI-KIT 7.

A TT OCACRAI('

%AIA I VL/r-InAIKM eULtL/ 10-r A-r T T7 I ige ijb oT 261 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I 2BBC-Top 4th Compartment Page 89 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 90 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z- I 9&ý, D CC-.. Equip. Class 1 2 t- M ,o, t .-. A,,, W.t. ,,A Cabn.L4.-Equipment Description 1).5 y t- MLc, a, bl"A Location:

Bldg. L Floor El. j ~o" Room, Area %6,85 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YM NI-2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)"PAXZ'0 11&0-co7, Mev~ I 4 v7.-L lt r-001, r ttv I r4 Xz XZ4q voo -4, ttU " 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YJ& NI- UE1 N/AEJ YX N[-] U-I N/Afl Y; N[lD U[-] N/A[l Y9 NEI UI- N/AD YgZ NEI UDE]Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 )Page 91 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. z- i ss- z fc.c Equip. Class 1 2 1_- hl, CoLk.\ CV.4--A wa"- ourAvlt- iAeAwl.WTI WýEquipment Description I-As '4bc. mu A nI Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y-M NEI UD N/A[I 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y15L Nil ULI N/A[l and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YJ NEI ULi N/AL]YJX N-] UlE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YDJ NF-] UiE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

i;tu\ "-,' pec4-ov, e4 ,- ,,v,, *,'ewk Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

C-kO% U. o*--o .Cc"; ktaA % reorA ýO MA 1 1aaf CrVr'ra-\Cl 4~b aOCUW%*rYA Evaluated by: J --I ..--" -so s P .X Date: 3/u /zors.3 td< C-4 )Page 92 of 231 9 ArlON I OWN rF rage ji O0 L- I T 7.TOc-% oI 01, 4 ,,#4 1.I- -.--- .

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0....

ATTACHMENT 7: ige Jb OT ZJ1 Tr7.T7)\AIM I--")N 90 I/rage ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

2- I9o5-- $-ROfq Equip. Class1 2 2-Low \Jn .anJ (1Ac.Igg,.

P'an.1 Eauinment Description Ll.qn V nlaneý4/Location:

Bldg. Floor El. 19o'-O" Room, Area R. Od Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorate (See- JO.A..d a/.3/Z1S')

I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE]-]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

/2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild rface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the oncrete near the anchol 5. Is the anchorage configuration co istent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applie if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configur on verification is required.)
6. Based on the above rnchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adver seismic conditions?

rs?YE NEI U[E N/AD YEI NEI UE N/AD YEr NEI U[- N/AD YE-] NEI UE1 N/AD YEI N[l UE-¶2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B" Classes of Equipment.

A C-3 >Page 98 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-2t1o 5 104f Equip. Class 1 2 Z- Vqj.4va. 5( gay ,v Bi-tayl,.

Pavi Equipment Description 4190Y 5im4fý-iqýab-2-ARoLi Interaction Effects (See SWC.. dAc,4*-j S/iz.1-)7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y["] NEI I] N/Al]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and ligh g, YEI NE] U[ N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipme 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to a ddamage? YE! NEI U[-] N/A[]10. Based on the above seismic int action evaluations, is equipment free YE! NEI U-1 of potentially adverse seis interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yt& NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?A

.4 \ i, a, 4 ,.. ;.,.,fv,, cowpaek, -Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N o% t Evaluazted hv: ý--76/ ~ t -T afn u Date: 3 /z7-/v5£70 P C-4 >Page 99 of 231 Livi IT 7: TS NO 1-RPT rage i UU OTi zaI

  • ArI OWN (-H 9PT 119 NT 7-AN NO 1-RPT-i 9 ,-0 ige A -I-'7.'r-f.c, ige 1 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02.

VERSION 2.0 age 1U4 01

-'7.T-02. VERSION 2.0 I1 2 It ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z- I0o S -5 1"- tli Equip. Class 1 2 1, -M 4.er5 C- r,-,s a, Equipment Description STrA"rE (N f -rn A-HY-2-OIS Location:

Bldg. Cev-krol Floor El. I'o'-O" Room, Area Vt. 2. (Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraee (se-e. 3 wc dc..elA IIz-)1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item o e of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose har are?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more tha mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuratio consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only a lies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage confi ration verification is required.)
6. Based on the abo e anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adv se seismic conditions?

YE: NEI YE-] NEI UE- N/AE YE-] NEI UE:1 N/AE-YE- NE] UE1 N/AE-]YEI NEI UE- N/AE-YEI N[E U[E 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

A C-3 >Page 106 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.2-i o5 Equip. Class 1 2 Ii, -,-,. C. ,-%tr covAJ ru.t,-s Equipment Description 1 pm.-" Ft It / P t .. U ---o \ 05 Interaction Effects (See. A-. 4c,-k,-ckd

%ISIVll-')

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO] NE] N/AE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and Ii ing, YE] NE] UE] N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equi nt?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibili avoid damage? YO NE] UE1 N/AE]10. Based on the above seis c interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE] NE] UE]of potentially adve seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Pi .V;WG6 jrSt9C-Oý-Y o04 1AY. JnA4EV.V%,,\ ws Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N'o~ne_Evaluated by: __ S.-i 14 n J,7- Date: O /1<C-4 )Page 107 of 231 A TTAf PI~-IKEIIT "7.If' 7 C' VAIAI Vflrlrt-Al (I-I e C1l1P\119Zl DDTr age ]

ATTr-r'7.IIP \AIAI S1DDT A) \/"IDCl"kl

') n ige ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

Equip. Class 1 2 lb- ,sv .. aCA Xreývc,4er..

Eauioment Descrintion Ta.A Vt 7 IS 0\ N 4\ V rL-T ~1r r Location:

Bldg. FloorEl. %go'-o" Room, Area Lt¶ ?-(,0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae (See, SLAC-. ao.Arej 9/zci/ZOI2.')

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YOI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild su ace oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the co rete near the anc YF[ NO U- N/A]YE-] NO UO N/AO YE-" NO UC- N/AC YE NE U-- N/AC YE-1 NEI U[-C 5. Is the anchorage configuration consis nrt with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies ifte item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuratio erification is required.)
6. Based on the above anc rage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse se'mic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Page 110 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

2-lo 5-Yk-IC5 Equip. Class 1 2 lb -, I e-,!a C(Z,)r'ar avkI Equipment Description N M-r LV ' NVE1L-T r Interaction Effects (SWe .3' da.4 /z ilzolT-)7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YE] NE N/A[]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighti , YE] NEI UE] N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoi amage? Y] NE] UE] N/AE]10. Based on the above seismic interaci n evaluations, is equipment free YE] NE] UE]of potentially adverse seismic i raction effects?Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NE] Ur-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

A uý btal irspet-o¶, 04- Jt IjI~.4vv\ -ovpaov4-S o4 DYNc~n~cuo~Vc~~iJc

%115/3/4%>~

chctlK 4 r okv C%4%0rv--e pa~cuq- kv J~stu too l .ooV-eJ l;On Wvnyovr%+ -jrL AJd."0a CJVCe~-s.c..,,:-

Lii.,.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: z Date: 1 5.13 zý / /<C-4>Page 111 of 231 ATr TT-.DDTo/him rage -i z 01 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCVC* ...ige 11, OT 2.1i ATr 7. c I If'I n/M\AIKI f IIL ILII ICTC c 4 DDTr III i B rage 1 114 0T

-r-r T TT1 7.I 1 l'l Fage 1

'T 7.D fT)') \Icr7 Fage i ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: @ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 'I- Iol- V 3- L1 Equip. Class1L,-

(12 .. T,,,e,-Equipment Description ViýA Ac-.. "a,,,,

Location:

Bldg. Floor El. j- Room, Area (L S31 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage (S Cr SbWC. C164a4&d 9/1 1/1z')1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?/3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild rface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the ncrete near the anchors?YE-]YE- N[-E UE-1 N/AE YEI NEI UE N/AE Y[E1 NEi UE- N/AE YEI NEI- UE:) N/AE YEI NE] UE-5. Is the anchorage configuration con stent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applie if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configura ion verification is required.)
6. Based on the above chorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially advers seismnic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 )Page 117 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

Z-!lV01-"Y3-%DOq Equip. Class 1 2 6u.- :e-%'4,v, , ,r,,,or 4 crs Equipment Description N i kPA PC- lmurr4lcr anT311Y Interaction Effects (6,,L *SWC. jc.4cd SC/t /7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y-E- NE]E] N/AE]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipmi P IYE] NEI UE] N/AE]YE] NE] UE] N/AE]free YE] N[3 UE-9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to 10. Based on the above seismic intc of potentially adverse seismicji effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?0 Ins I)CC4ofY 04 ý,,4 ;,rv-h,\ -o-mp.o,.,'s c Wbn* U6.5 P61 40vWwiJ OV /~12-/13 3LO Check rir Olevv CL~ hvevsle C~jjv~.- por4tculaa, -Lv~ swx caint 100". + veC, 4 C.. '1%tW^ cov".APol'ep&s DcTL "IVua 4-0 5revreIlY~i 1ncC6.scovi.

fas4ewie,-5 o.icnf JL*&C-ý;%ý We' --910.Cd, .-, wel &-sI Ser%%v 4'. TV'issin 5 ar L a4~'ew-S /Connec4i~n5.

Wa VJ004jr Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) cN--r -~ ~ c .k.6 xrr-,ý s Jo,

£,,rou.Weo 414 W.., ,m,.. -t-'q Evaluated by: /4 e "/TSi~ (?Z. n ig.Date: 3 / 1% / I "&2 jiZ- I/-< C-4 >Page 118 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO 2DDI14 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 age AT r- 7.CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, age 1ic1 OT e~ll ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:Q(D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- i ges6-'- 0 C AA Equip. Class 1 2 -hri- CNC .°. j_'-I 0 Equipment Description N&4JI,r%1 6a,5i. aM -c Location:

Bldg. Floor El. yto'- Room, Area V-.. 2.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage (s4e. $W(. .1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y[] NEI 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild s rface YE-I NE[I oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the c ncrete near the anchors? YEI NE]5. Is the anchorage configuration cons itent with plant documentation?

YEI NEI (Note: This question only applies i the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configurat n verification is required.)

6. Based on the above a chorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE-" NEI potentially adverse eismic conditions?

UEr N/AE3 UE1 N/AE-UE- N/A[]UE- N/AE-]UE1 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4 C-3 )Page 122 of 231 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 7. -1 of. I- o- C.AA Equip. Class' \O- e. , " e Equipment Description PbjHer .t C_ ,a, 2..AIIC.Interaction Effects ( S-c. .7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEI N [I N/AE 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and Ii ng, YE NE] ULI N/A]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equip t?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility t void damage? YEI NE] UEJ N/A]10. Based on the above seismi ' teraction evaluations, is equipment free YE- NE] U[-]of potentiallyadverses mic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9, NE-' UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

A vi-,,a" 4.iovi a 4 4Oe 1.

6WI ..L.06,.% 1ooK.,, J vf 4!5 iCOlrt r u 4.. W-ere AJ¶JU ,,CI'SS,,V(tJ4

',tg l..a AS&C- MC CobCbi"t-'C t"t U 9 1 A.S., 0, 1,,.. 1( ý& sw.a 5 hu, 40v- ,v 4lwvec 4 bolI+/

i-,a iAyrru, .C.ovali.lj-on

s. CLu.ere .'nutin Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) f'or AV.- 014 14 e!>, V",%S well r~at%"6liP~eAd Evaluated by: -Y IF ,' Date: S/191/I2 ( C-4 >Page 123 of 231 9 ACT 7:T AIklN 1-RPT-age 1 ATT~rýiT 7.Ir' %AIAI TAIM 'I-IrC-'VI IQTCI 1 DDT3-Ige I A TT TI "7- Qr-ICNAI" IAIAI L.1 /-1.tlI/()r\ I 00 DD age
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-13-1236,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._2.0,_Vogtle_Unit_2_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic._Part_11_of_14&oldid=892161"