ML13186A141
| ML13186A141 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 08/08/2013 |
| From: | Patricia Holahan Division of Security Operations |
| To: | Emily Larson FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| Dexter, Robert (301) 287-3685 | |
| References | |
| EA-13-133 IR-13-201 | |
| Download: ML13186A141 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000334/2013201
Text
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
August 8, 2013
Mr. Eric Larson
Site Vice President
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company
Beaver Valley Power Station
Mail Stop A-BV-SEB1
Route 168
Shippingport, PA 15077
SUBJECT:
BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - NRC SECURITY
INSPECTION REPORT 05000334/2013201 AND 05000412/2013201
PRELIMINARY GREATER THAN GREEN
Dear Mr. Larson:
On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at
your Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The inspection covered one or more of the
key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. The
enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed via
telephone on June 26, 2013, with you and other members of your staff.
NRC inspectors examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed
personnel.
The attached report documents one finding that has been preliminarily determined to be greater
than Green (i.e., a finding of greater than very low significance) that may result in the need for
further evaluation to determine significance and, therefore, the need for additional NRC action.
The finding was assessed based on the best available information, using the Physical
Protection Significance Determination Process. This deficiency was promptly corrected or
compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and
security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the area.
The finding is also an apparent violation of NRC requirements and is being considered for
escalated enforcement action in accordance with the NRCs Enforcement Policy, which can be
found on the NRCs Web site at: http://nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement.
The enclosure transmitted herewith contains Safeguards Information. When separated from
the enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled.
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
E. Larson
- 2 -
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
In accordance with NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Significance Determination
Process (SDP), we intend to complete our evaluation using the best available information and
issue our final determination of security significance within 90 days of this letter. The
significance determination process encourages an open dialogue between the NRC staff and
the licensee; however, the dialogue should not impact the timeliness of the staffs final
determination.
Before we make our final significance determination, we are providing you with an opportunity to
(1) attend a regulatory conference where you can present to the NRC your perspective on the
facts and assumptions the NRC used to arrive at the finding and assess its significance; or
(2) submit your position on the finding to the NRC in writing. If you request a regulatory
conference, it should be held within 30 days of the receipt of this letter, and we encourage you
to submit supporting documentation at least 1 week prior to the conference in an effort to make
the conference more efficient and effective. In the interest of protecting sensitive
security-related information, if a regulatory conference is held, it will not be open for public
observation. If you decide to submit only a written response, such a submittal should be sent to
the NRC within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. If you decline to request a regulatory
conference or submit a written response, you relinquish your right to appeal the final SDP
determination, in that by not doing either, you fail to meet the appeal requirements stated in the
prerequisite and limitation sections of Attachment 2 of IMC 0609.
Please contact Mr. Robert C. Johnson at (301) 287-3688, and in writing, within 10 days from the
issue date of this letter to notify the NRC of your intentions. If we have not heard from you
within 10 days, we will continue with our significance determination and enforcement decision.
The final resolution of this matter will be conveyed in a separate correspondence.
Because the NRC has not made a final determination in this matter, no notice of violation is
being issued for these inspection findings at this time. In addition, please be advised that the
number and characterization of the apparent violation(s) may change as a result of further NRC
review.
In addition, six NRC-identified findings of very low security significance (i.e., Green as
determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process) were identified
during this inspection. The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated for, and the
plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the
scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the area.
These findings were determined to involve violations of NRC requirements. However, the NRC
is treating the violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the NRC
If you contest the violations or significance of these NCVs, you should provide a response within
30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
E. Larson
- 3 -
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
copies to the Regional Administrator, Region I; the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspectors at the
Beaver Valley Power Station.
Five cross-cutting aspects were assigned to findings. The first finding had a cross-cutting
aspect in the area of Human Performance, Decision Making H.1(b) The second finding had a
cross-cutting aspect in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution because the licensee
failed to conduct comprehensive self-assessments P.3(a). The third finding had a
cross-cutting aspect in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution because the licensee
failed to identify issues completely and accurately P.1(a). The fifth finding had a
cross-cutting aspect in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution because the licensee
failed to systematically collect, evaluate and communicate P.2(a). The sixth finding had a
cross-cutting aspect in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution because the licensee
failed to implement Operating Experience through changes to station procedures P.2(b). If you
disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response
within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the
Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response (NSIR); and to the Branch Chief,
Security Performance Evaluation Branch, Division of Security Operations, NSIR.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRC's
"Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the
NRC Public Documents Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public
Electronic Reading Room).
However, the material enclosed herewith contains Safeguards Information as defined by
10 CFR 73.21 and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals is prohibited by Section 147 of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be
made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from
the PARS component of NRC's ADAMS. If you choose to provide a response and Safeguards
Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide the level of
protection described in 10 CFR 73.21. Otherwise, if security-related information is necessary to
provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire response Security-Related
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
E. Larson
- 4 -
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
Information - Withhold from Public Disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390 in accordance with
10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In
accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your
response.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Patricia K. Holahan, Director
Division of Security Operations
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
Docket Nos. 50-334, 50-412
Nonpublic Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000334/2013201 and 05000412/2013201
w/Attachments: Supplemental Information
cc w/encl: D. Craine, Security Manager
OFFICE
NSIR/DSO/SPEB
NSIR/DSO
NSIR/DSO/SPEB
RI
NSIR/DSO/SPEB
NSIR/DSO
NAME
R. Dexter
J. Curry
J. Willis
A. Dimitriadis
C. Johnson
P. Holahan
DATE
7/5/13
7/5/13
7/9/13
8/2/13
8/5/13
8/8/13