ML13179A026
| ML13179A026 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 06/27/2013 |
| From: | Polickoski J Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | Soenen P Pacific Gas & Electric Co |
| Polickoski J | |
| References | |
| TAC MF1959, TAC MF1960 | |
| Download: ML13179A026 (1) | |
Text
1 Burkhardt, Janet From:
Polickoski, James Sent:
Thursday, June 27, 2013 6:43 PM To:
'Soenen, Philippe R' Cc:
'Baldwin, Thomas (DCPP)'; Burkhardt, Janet
Subject:
Acceptance Review for Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 License Amendment Request for Administrative Revisions to TS 3.7.10 and 5.6.5 (TAC Nos. MF1959 and MF1960)
Philippe Soenen Supervisor, Regulatory Services By letter dated June 6, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML13158A137), Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-80 and DPR-82 for Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and
- 2. Specifically, the licensee requests to revise Technical Specifications (TS) 3.7.10, Control Room Ventilation System (CRVS) and TS 5.6.5, CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR).
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this license amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have questions, please contact me at 301-415-5430, james.polickoski@nrc.gov.
James Polickoski Project Manager, Diablo Canyon Power Plant US NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL4 james.polickoski@nrc.gov 301-415-5430