ML13123A181

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acceptance Review Results Regarding Millstone 2 - Control Rod Drive Mechanisms License Amendment Request (MF1172)
ML13123A181
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 05/02/2013
From: Nadiyah Morgan
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Bartron W
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut
Morgan N
References
TAC MF1172
Download: ML13123A181 (2)


Text

From: Morgan, Nadiyah To: Lee, Erika

Subject:

Email to add and dispatch in ADAMS Date: Thursday, May 02, 2013 3:50:48 PM Public, non-sensitive, Sunsi review completed, NRC users have viewer rights, DPC has owner rights Your services are greatly appreciated!

From: Morgan, Nadiyah Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 3:49 PM To: 'william.d.bartron@dom.com'

Subject:

Acceptance Review Results Regarding Millstone 2 - Control Rod Drive Mechanisms License Amendment Request (MF1172)

Bill, By letter dated March 21, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML13085A081), Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to revise the footnote in Technical Specification (TS) 3.1.3.7 -

Control Rod Drive Mechanisms to provide consistency with the operability requirements of TS Table 3.3-1, Reactor Protective Instrumentation, when control rod drive mechanisms are energized and capable of withdrawal for Millstone Power Station, Unit No. 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed LAR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review, as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified, despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Thanks, Dee Nadiyah S. Morgan Calvert Cliffs Project Manager, NRR Millstone Project Manager, NRR

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-1016 Nadiyah.Morgan@NRC.GOV