ML13008A061
| ML13008A061 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 08/10/2012 |
| From: | Lucarelli B, Beigi F, Guerra E, Helffrich A, Reddington J, Wakefield D ABS Consulting, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| L-12-283 | |
| Download: ML13008A061 (127) | |
Text
L~Ž~Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Sheet 21 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IAB-Ig Floor El.
574 Bldg.
AX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Anchorage of components in a high radiation contaminated area was examined visually from a distance of-JOft and no adverse conditions were identified
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
ttVA C ducts and piping in the area were identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y N
U N/A X
Y N
U N/A X
Y N
U N/A X
Y N
U N/A X
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
!E21N0050 I E22N0005 IE51NO055A IG43N0060A I G43N0060B
I~IŽQPauil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
r\\(,NEERS &, CONSULTANtS Sheet 22 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1AB-Ig Floor El.
574 Bldg.
AX Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regardingfire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Barrier and welding machine adequately restrained Temporary scaffolding in area judged to be adequately restrained
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
I Y
N U
x I
Attached 4 inch diameter lines to sump pumps are rod hung, creating the potentialfor high nozzle loads. This is judged to be OK as the sump pumps are not Category I and the lines do not have the potential to flood Category I components.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
[
GNONURS& IAL
)S LTA~fr, Sheet 23 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area lAB-1 Floor El.
574 Bldg.
A Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
LX File Name: 1-59-3-1-18.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view north hallway File Name: 1-65-3-1-18.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of temporary equipment restrained
LKYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
'q \\
",INEERS & CONSULTANrTS Sheet 24 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IAB-Ig Floor El.
574 Bldg.
AX File Name: 1-66-3-1-1.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view west hallway ft.-
if I
File Name: !-67-3-1-18.jpeg
==
Description:==
Inaccessible high radiation contaminated area where anchorage was checked from -10 ft
L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
EM-I I'ilR' & CONSULTANTS Sheet 25 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IAB-Ig Floor El.
574 Bldg.
AX File Name: 1-68-3-1-18.jpeg
==
Description:==
Rod Hung Sump Pump Piping
L Y
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONMULTAATh Sheet 26 of 139 Status:
Y 0
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IAB-2 West Floor El.
599 Bldg.
AX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Y N
U N/A x
I I
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
TB Chillers IP46-BOOIA and IP46-BOOIB are very large double stack chillers anchored with only four 3/4" anchor bolts on a -16" wide x -6" high pedestal. These chillers are not category I and anchorage may not be adequate for seismic loading. Judged acceptable because the chillers have a limited water supply and would not impact or flood any CA T-1 components if they should fail.
Y
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant EIX degraded conditions?
Anchorage forTB chillers identified with significant corrosion. This isjudged to be acceptable, as described in comments for Question 1.
Y
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit x
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable trays in the area were identified to be rigidly supported Y
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial X
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
N U
N/A N
U N/A N
U N/A Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
1H51P0037
Fv Ql Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
%tINONUHRS&
(WM tTd A"I Sheet 27 of 139 Status:
Y 8
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IAB-2 West Floor El.
599 Bldg.
AX Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Fire protection piping is a combination of welded and victaulic type with adequate lateral support systems. No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Potential Fire Sources in the Area: TBCC Lubricating Oil and Hydraulic Fluid No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Scaffold staging area is adjacent to CA T-1 panel IH5 1P003 7. Potential for equipment or pieces of scaffold to slide into panel. CR 2012-12375 generated to document this situation.
Y N
U x
I I
I
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/20 12
Fv Q j Paul C. Rizzo As~ociates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & C0NSULTA%'~T.
Sheet 28 of 139 Status:
Y 0
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1AB-2 West Floor El.
599 Bldg.
AX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
Pile Name: 1-59-3-1-2z.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of scaffold staging area rite iName: i-oo-.-i-zu.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of scaffold staging area
VQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
WON[R ON,
.IN Sheet 29 of 139 Status:
Y 8
tU Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IAB-2 West Floor El.
599 Bldg.
AX File Name: 1-67-3-1-20.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of I P46B00 IA water chiller in the area File Name: 1-70-3-1-20.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of corroded pipe in IP46BOO1A
LQPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
INGINEERS & C'ON'SULTAN-TS Sheet 30 of 139 Status:
Y a
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IAB-2 West Floor El.
599 Bldg.
AX rie iName: I-/I-3-i-Lu.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of corroded bolt located north east end of I P46B00 I B File Name: 1-77-3-1-20.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of chillers
Paul C. Rizzo Asociates, Inc.
M-NElNERS & ( ONUI TAN'I I Sheet 31 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area I AB-2 East Floor El.
599 Bldg.
AX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Anchorage for two CA T-2 chillers in area were identified with significant corrosion.
This is judged to be acceptable because the chillers have a limited water supply and would not impact or flood any CA T-I components if they should fail.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Overhead piping found to have adequate restraints.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A Y
N U
N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
1 H51 P0975
'4r-Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Sheet 32 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IAB-2 East Floor El.
599 Bldg.
AX Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Fire protection piping is rigidly supported No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary scaffolding found to be well braced
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x I I
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 7
Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
DCŽ%D Pauil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
[%\\(; INEE R&
fl)NSL L TAN I S Sheet 33 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area lAB-2 East Floor El.
599 Bldg.
AX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
I File Name: 1-72-3-1-20.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view File Name: 1-74-3-1-20.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view
L~YŽPatil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENG.INEERS & CONSULTAN-PS Sheet 34 of 139 Status:
(S)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IAB-2 East Floor El.
599 Bldg.
AX File Name: 1-76-3-1-20.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of overhead piping restraints
Vv---
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
t* %(,I%[ H.& L ON'L IT TN-11 Sheet 35 of 139 Status:
T N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IAB-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
AX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC ducts in the area were identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Space heaters are rod hung and their attached piping is also rod hung with adequaqie flexibility. Judged OK.
Y N
U N/A X
Y N
U N/A X
Y N
U N/A X
Y N
U N/A X
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
1P57F0015B
ŽV Q j Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINFERS & CONSLITANTh Sheet 36 of 139 Status:
W*
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IAB-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
AX Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Oily trash drum is not restrained, but the lid is tight. Judged not to create potential interaction. No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Tool and equipment carts in area have wheels chocked Ladders are tied or clamped
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
PPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Sheet 37 of 139 ING;IN L.RI & ONII LT NNTI Status:
T N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IAB-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
AX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
File Name: 1-59-2-1-15.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view File Name: 1-60-2-1-15.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of HVAC support
F-r%'Q ) Pauil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
FN(.INEERS & CONSUtTAN-rS Sheet 38 of 139 Status:
Y U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Cabinet IR24-S0023 welded to shims rather than to embeds. SQ-01 78 for ECP 02-0184 rev 0 and all referenced Design Inputs confirms this is consistent with licensing basis.
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC ducts and cable trays in the area were identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
An unrestrained tool storage locker wasfound near components. CR2012-12222 generated to document this situation, and the cabinet was subsequently moved Most flourescent lights have compression fittings. A row of twist-in style lights was observed, but it was judged to be unlikely to impact any components.
Trolleys on top of switchgears were observed to be unrestrained These trolleys were positioned in the center of the switchgear, consistent with IPEEE resolution of the issue.
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
IH51P0871 IR22S0006-E04 1R23S0012 IR24S0028 1R25S0018 IR25S0020
L
'2YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
[,6NEIL: IS&
Ot NSI 11 %NJ, Sheet 39 of 139 Status:
Y 0
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
A fire protection valve near components was observed to be adequately supported Fire protetion piping throughout room is C02. No concerns identified regardingflood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Workbench near 1R24-S028 has wheels locked
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x I I
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENG.INEERS
&. CONSLITAN-TS Sheet 40 of 139 6
U Status:
Y Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area I CC-3ea Floor El.
620 Bldg.
C Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
2C File Name: 1-59-1-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room File Name: 1-65-1-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
Fire protection valve well supported
LKYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
EN;(.INELRS& t* ONS,,L I TA %Is Sheet 41 of 139 U
Status:
Y Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area I CC-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC File Name: 1-68-1-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of MCC EFI C07 anchorage (1 R24-S0023)
File Name: 1-69-1-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
Tool locker not restrained behind bus/breakers
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINFERS & CONSLWTA'"TS Sheet 42 of 139 Status:
Y a
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC File Name: 1-71-1-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of trolley on top of Cabinet File Name: 1-72-1-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of area where tool locker was located
ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
L JNU;~E[Rý,&
C.ON'Mý I TAN.iI ¢ Sheet 43 of 139 Status:
Y (a
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1CC-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC File Name: 1-74-1-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of trolley on top of Cabinet File Name: 1-75-1-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of single row of fluorescent lights
PleCV-j Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
[NUINFERS & CONULTjrNTS Sheet 44 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-3b Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Cabinet 1R24-S0029 welded to shims rather than to embeds. SQ-01 78 for ECP 02-0184 rev 0 and all referenced Design Inputs confirms this is consistent with licensing basis.
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable trays in the area were identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Fluorescent lights appear to have compression fittings, thus judged acceptable for seismic motion.
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
0R42S0011 IE22S0005 IH51P0872 1R22S0009 IR25S0022
"IYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Sheet 45 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area I CC-3b Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Eyewash station anchored to floor. Stepstool noted in area, but judged not to be a concern.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
MA(,NEERS & (iONSUITANYTS Sheet 46 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1CC-3b Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
File Name: 1-59-2-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room ltle Name: i-oU-L-l-oojpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room
J*Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
I NCINUERS &I* ONIL LT \\*rS Sheet 47 of 139 File Name: 1-65-2-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of IR24-S0029 welded shims
IDIQ.j Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
E%(.INE4IS & LtONWtTA\\TI, Sheet 48 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-3c Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Cabinets IR24-S0021, IR21-S0019, and 0R24-S0035 are welded to shims rather than to embeds. SQ-01 78 for ECP 02-0184 rev 0 and all referenced Design Inputs confirms this is consistent with licensing basis.
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC ducts and cable trays in the area were identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Fluorescent lights appear to have compression fittings, thus judged acceptable for seismic motion. A single row offlourescent lights was observed with twist-in fittings, but this row was judged not to have any credible impact targets as it was more than -4'from components.
Trolleys on top of switchgears were observed to be unrestrained These trolleys were positioned in the center of the switchgear, consistent with IPEEE resolution of the issue.
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
0R24S0020 1R22S0007 IR25S0014 IR25S0016 1R25S0025 IR25S0033
IXYŽPatti C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
EN( INtFil w
.IS1T'NI,.
Sheet 49 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-3c Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Fire protection valve located -lOftfrom regulating transformerjudged to be adequately supported Fire protection is well supported C02 piping. No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I I
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 BiA.
!a
/
Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
[*--Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENG.INEEMRS
& CONSULTAVTS Sheet 50 of 139 N
U Status:
(Y)
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1CC-3 c Floor El.
620 Bldg.
C Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
- C File Name: 1-59-3-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room File Name: 1-60-3-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of 1R24-S0021 welded to shims
[*
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
tNGINEERý, C'tNSt !TAV*IS*
Sheet 51 of 139 Status:
T(1 N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-3c Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC File Name: 1-65-3-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of supports for cable trays File Name: 1-67-3-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
Fire protection valve near transformer judged to be adequately supported
ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINER¶. & CONSULTAN*TS Sheet 52 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-3c Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC File Name: 1-69-3-i-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
Welded shims for IR21-S0019 File Name: 1-70-3-1-06.jpeg
==
Description:==
Welded shims for 0R24-S0035
- QPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENCIlNFERS
& IONIh*L 1L1A*1 I
Sheet 53 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-3c Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC rue i*vame: u-ij-.I-i-uo.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of trolley on top of Cabinet rile lName: i-/z-_-i-uo.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of single row of fluorescent lights
X Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
L 6
(.INEERS & CONSULTA0,"r, Sheet 54 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-4b Floor El.
620 Bldg.
IB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
I. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable trays identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Overhead grating is adequately restrained Y
N U
N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
IG41FO145
Fw Q' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
EN( I'.ERS &
t)NSVLIANP.
Sheet 55 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1CC-4b Floor El.
620 Bldg.
IB Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Fire protection piping is 1/4" diameter and hung to I beams with friction clamps. This is judged to be OK due to the low demand, small diameter pipe, and no equipment in the area vulnerable to spray. No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
An unrestrained table was identified in the area but judged not to be significant.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
FT Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 B7 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
LXYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSULTAN*S Sheet 56 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-41b Floor El.
620 Bldg.
I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
B File Name: 1-59-2-1-16.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room File Name: 1-60-2-1-16.jpeg
==
Description:==
Friction clip on fire protection piping
LQPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
UNGINEERS & ýOINS1LATANTlS Sheet 57 of 139 Status:
()
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area I CC-4b Floor El.
620 Bldg.
IB File Name: 1-65-2-1-16.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of fire protection piping and overhead grating File Name: i-66-2-1-16.jpeg
==
Description:==
Potential impact from table judged not to be significant
I Q
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSSLA!I'SA Sheet 58 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-4c Floor El.
638 Bldg.
CC Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Y N
U N/A
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of X
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Y N
U N/A
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant X
degraded conditions?
Y N
U N/A
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit X
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable trays and HVAC in the area were identified to be rigidly supported Y
N U
N/A
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial X
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Fluorescent lights are rod hung and have compression fittings, thus judged acceptable for seismic motion.
Trolley on top of cabinet was positioned on center of cabinet consistent with IPEEE resolution of the issue andjudged not to be a concern.
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
IR42S0008 IR42S0013 1R42S0014 IR42S0038
Ik Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
E NCINU IRS & t t NWI TANI S Sheet 59 of 139 Status:
()
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-4c Floor El.
638 Bldg.
CC Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Fire protection is well-supported C02 piping. No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
_ _ F Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
Fv Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Sheet 60 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-4 c Floor El.
638 Bldg.
C Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
- C File Name: 1-59-1-1-02.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room File Name: 1-60-1-1-02.jpeg
==
Description:==
Rigid support cable tray and HVAC
- 'R Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
LNGINEEIKS
& C tNSk LT NM, Sheet 61 of 139 Status:
W)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area I CC-4c Floor El.
638 Bldg.
CC File Name: 1-65-1-1-02.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of compression fitting on fluorescent light File Name: 1-66-1-1-02.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of trolley on top of Cabinet
L
ŽPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSULTANS Sheet 62 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area I CC-4g Floor El.
638 Bldg.
CC Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Y N
U N/A
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of x
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Y N
U N/A
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant X
degraded conditions?
Y N
U N/A
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit X
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC and raceways in the area were identified to be rigidly supported Y
N U
N/A
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial x
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Fluorescent lights have compression fittings, thus judged acceptable for seismic motion.
The trolley on top of component is not locked in place, but is stored at the center of the component, consistent with the IPEEE resolution of the issue.
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
1R42S0012 IR42S0024
A Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
t NGINI L:Rý & CONqSI. LA%"1
- Sheet 63 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-4g Floor El.
638 Bldg.
CC Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Fire protection is C02 piping. No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Sheet 64 of 139 Status:
T)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1CC-4 9 Floor El.
638 Bldg.
(
Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
- C lPle Name: l-39-J-I-U2.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room rue iName: i-ou-i-i-o/.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of trolley on top of Cabinet
LI 7Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Lm_*ý 'Rlr N(- IN EH* & t ONM* TAN T*
Sheet 65 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-4h Floor El.
638 Bldg.
CC Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HtVAC ducts in the area were identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Lighting in the area identified with protective cover Y
N U
N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
I R42S0002
~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENG(INEERS
& CONS'UL1AN-FS Sheet 66 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1CC-4h Floor El.
638 Bldg.
CC Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Eyewash station identified to be bolted to floor
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
L I ŽPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENG;INFUERI
& (*ONsI LTIANTS Sheet 67 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1CC-4h Floor El.
638 Bldg.
CC Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
File Name: 1-59-4-1-02.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room File Name: 1-60-4-1-02.jpeg
==
Description:==
Protective light cover
I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS& CONSLTATrS Sheet 68 of 139 Status:
Y 0
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1CC-5a Floor El.
654 Bldg.
CC Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Ceiling grates were not tied off to main runners. An enhancement condition report (CR 2012-12335) was written to identify an opportunity to improve the standard by tie wrapping the egg crate tiles together.
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
I C22P0001 1H13P0701 Y
N U
N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Ž Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
F N(sINEf Rý & C'ONS1[ LT SNT*
Sheet 69 of 139 Status:
Y (S)
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-5a Floor El.
654 Bldg.
CC Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Various control room furniture were located in the vicinity of cabinets. The control room staff was notified and this issue is covered by CR-2012-12331.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A X
Y N
U N/A X
Y N
U XI Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Walkdown of Control Room on 8/10/12 by M. Alvi and J. Reddington as peer reviewers to validate findings earlier walked down by walkdown team. Reference Calc # 2:13.8
- 1. Panels C22-P001 and P002: Drawing racks are located next to these panels.
These panels have no sensitive relays, therefore no seismic 11/I concern.
- 2. Panels HI 3-P881 and P882: Drawing racks located next to these panels.
Per the referenced calc, there are no sensitive relays in the panels.
- 3. Panel H13-P871: These panels are seismically sensitive. Nothing stored in the vicinity.
- 4. Panel H13-P867 Relay Panel: Desk/podium stored next to this panel. Panel is not seismically sensitive.
- 5. Panel H13-P872: Table stored next to this panel. CR-2012-12331 written to document this concern.
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
~X:Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONJSULTANTS Sheet 70 of 139 U
Status:
Y Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-5a Floor El.
654 Bldg.
CC Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
rile Name: i-*-i-I-ui.jpeg
==
Description:==
Supply locker not anchored File Name: 1-60-1-1-03.jpeg
==
Description:==
Ceiling tiles not anchored
LŽC~ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
i\\(
INt Lit, &
O~NSIItT -Nis Sheet 71 of 139 Status:
Y (8
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-5a Floor El.
654 Bldg.
CC File Name: 1-65-1-1-03.jpeg
==
Description:==
Desks adjacent to reactivity control cabinets File Name: 1-68-1-1-03.jpeg
==
Description:==
Table not restrained
L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEFERS 6, CONSULJA",S Sheet 72 of 139 U
Status:
Y Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area ICC-5a Floor El.
654 Bldg.
CC rue Iname: i-o/-i-j-uj.jpeg
==
Description:==
Cabinet not anchored
'4C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
[ NGINE L.RS & C'oNst I TAM1 I Sheet 73 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IDG-la Floor El.
620 Bldg.
DG Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable trays in the area were identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
I M43C0002B IM43F0220B IR43SO001B I R45C0002B 1R46B0002B
Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSULTAN*M Sheet 74 of 139 Status:
(2 N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IDG-la Floor El.
620 Bldg.
DG Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Potential Fire Sources in the Area: DG Diesel Fuel and DG Lubricating Oil. No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
L 40C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
LNGN
\\(1 RS & LINKL I TANI, Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Sheet 75 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area IDG-la Floor El.
620 Bldg.
DG Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
File Name: 1-,9-3-1-U8.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view tile Name: 1-60-3-1-U8.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view
~IQ Patil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
EN(.INFIRS& CONSULTANTS Sheet 76 of 139 N
U Status:
W Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1DG-la Floor El.
620 Bldg.
DG File Name: 1-65-3-1-08.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view File Name: 1-66-3-1-08.jpeg
==
Description:==
Rigid supports for cable trays
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
E.'GN\\ft 6, tS O\\S N",
Sheet 77 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IDG-lb Floor El.
620 Bldg.
DG Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
I. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
All items in area are rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Overhead crane in the area observed to be positioned away from components.
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
1E22B5003 IE22SO001 IH51PI421 1R42S0037
L*Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CIONSULTAN V,
Sheet 78 of 139 Status:
T N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IDG-lb Floor El.
620 Bldg.
DG Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Fire protection is C02 piping. No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Potential Fire Sources in the Area: DG Diesel Fuel and DG Lubricating Oil. No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
LPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
E NGINE ERS& (A, L
tNtITANI' "
Sheet 79 of 139 Status:
(9)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1DG-lb Floor El.
620 Bldg.
DG Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
File Name: 1-59-2-1-08.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room File Name: 1-60-2-1-08.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room
L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
E'4,INEER-5 & CONSUL[TANTS Sheet 80 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IDG-lb Floor El.
620 Bldg.
DG File Name: 1-65-2-1-0U.jpeg
==
Description:==
Crane away from components
QPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
LMNGIFHý 6. ( OW)N I TA*Is Sheet 81 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IDG-Ic Floor El.
620 Bldg.
DG Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Space heater observed to be crooked, judged not to be a concern
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Raceways in the area were identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
IM43CO001A 1M43F0030A 1R45A0003A IR45C0003A IR45N0140A 1R46BOO01A
~'QI Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
EXGINEERS & "INSIUtTANTS Sheet 82 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1DG-ic Floor El.
620 Bldg.
DG Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Fire protection is rigidly supported C02 piping. No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Potential Fire Sources in the Area: DG Diesel Fuel and DG Lubricating Oil. No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
Ž Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
P *lIC
-[INU
& CONSU LT%'N1 Sheet 83 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IDG-I c Floor El.
620 Bldg.
[
Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
- G File Name: 1-59-1-1-08.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room File Name: 1-60-1-1-08.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room
LXYŽPaul C. Rizzo Associates, 111C.
Liiý ENLINEERS &. CONSULTAN'Ts Sheet 84 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 1DG-Ic Floor El.
620 Bldg.
DG File Name: 1-65-1-1-08.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of crooked heater. Not a concern for operability.
Plile Name: 1-66-l-l-mj.Jpeg
==
Description:==
View of heater anchorage
LKYŽI-Paul C. Rizzo Associate~s, Inc.
E\\(NFNý 0 N't I I 'N\\1 Sheet 85 of 139 Status:
W*
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IDG-Ic Floor El.
620 Bldg.
DG rite rname: i-o/-i-i-utmjpeg
==
Description:==
General view of top of generator
~ŽQ1 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSUiTAVTS Sheet 86 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 2CC-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable trays in the area were identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Fluorescent lights have compression fittings, thus judged acceptable for seismic motion.
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
2R42S0037
-'q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, inc.
VN(AINHfRS &It ONNU qlA %l Sheet 87 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 2CC-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Eyewash station anchored
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
LXYŽPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSULTACNIS Sheet 88 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 2CC-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CC Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
FlYŽ Paiul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc Sheet 89 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 2CC-6a Floor El.
679 Bldg.
CC Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
ttVAC ducts in the area were identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
0M23C0001A 0M23C0002A 0M23F0100A
- ŽQ1 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & COM4NM[TAVYS Sheet 90 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 2CC-6a Floor El.
679 Bldg.
CC Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Potential Flood Source in the Area: Control Complex Chilled Water Expansion Tank (OP47A0002A). Fire protection piping judged not to be a concern. Piping is welded and rod hung but dry throughout room except where it enters. No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Ladders in area were found to be properly tied off
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
I Y
N U
N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
~ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates., Inc.
Sheet 91 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area 2CC-6a Floor El.
679 Bldg.
C Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
2C tile Name: I-Z9-1-l-U4.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view HIle Name: 1-6U-1-1-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view
I[IŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Sheet 92 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area 2CC-6a Floor El.
679 Bldg.
CC File Name: 1-65-1-1-04.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view
~ZYŽ Patul C. Rizzo Aissociates, Inc.
Sheet 93 of 139 Status:
(2 N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area cc-I Floor El.
586 Bldg.
CC Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Y N
U N/A
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of x
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Two unanchored instrument air dryers identified near air receivers. A subsequent walkdown was performed and it was confirmed that there is no safety related equipment/component located in the near vicinity of this rack as well as no seismic I1/1 concern.
Y N
U N/A
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant x
degraded conditions?
Y N
U N/A
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit x
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC ducts and raceways in the area were identified to be rigidly supported Welded ECC piping observed to have adequate lateral and longitudinal supports.
Y N
U N/A
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial X
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
OH51 P0039 0H51PO193 OH51P0318 0P47B0001A 0P47C0001A IP42BOO01B IP42CO001B IP42F0665A IP42F0665B
FV Q-Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & FA)NSULTINTS, Sheet 94 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CC-1 Floor El.
586 Bldg.
CC Interaction Effects Y
N U
N/A x
I I
I I
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Potential Flood Sources in the Area: Sewage Ejectors (OP66A5001A and OP66A500IB), Electrical Hot Water Heater (OP71AO003), and CC Chilled Water Storage Tanks (OP47A5006A, OP47A5006B, and OP47A5006C).
Fire protection piping ranges from I" to 4" diamter and is primarily rod hung, potential to interact with other overhead piping. Branch pipes are supported by rod hangers that utilize friction clips. Fire protection piping is victaulic coupling type 77 (grooved connection) andjudged OK. Configuration judged to be acceptable based on previous seismic evaluations shown in 36-series calculations. No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Potential Fire Sources in the Area: CCW Water Chiller Lubrication and P51/P52 Air Compressor Oil. No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could X
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Cast iron pipes were identified with tags reading Seismic Violation. After walkdown proceedings, it was confirmed that these tags relate back to a seismic walkdown from the past that identified issues and design engineering resolved issues. No furlher action was required I" to 3" diameters piping to water heater P71-A003 is rod hung. Judged OK as it is non-seismic and potentialflooding would not impact equipment.
6 inch diameter cast iron sewage piping observed to be supported by long rod hangers. Judged OK as the piping is non-seismic and potential flooding would not impact Category I equipment.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/20 12
7 qr Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Sheet 95 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CC-i Floor El.
586 Bldg.
C Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
- C File Name: 1-59-1-1-0i.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room File Name: 1-60-1-1-O1.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room
~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
L~~~aak F
'q!
INEERtS
& CANSILIANTS Sheet 96 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CC-I Floor El.
586 Bldg.
CC FileName: 1-65-1-1-O1.jpeg
==
Description:==
HVAC rigidly supported FileName: 1-66-1-1-O1.jpeg
==
Description:==
Victaulic fire protection piping
L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Sheet 97 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CC-I Floor El.
586 Bldg.
CC a
wr
' atm File Name: 1-67-1-1-O1.jpeg
==
Description:==
Rod hung fire protection piping File Name: 1-70-1-1-01.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of B area
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & UONSULTAN1S Sheet 98 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CC-I Floor El.
586 Bldg.
CC File Name: 1-71-1-1-O1.jpeg
==
Description:==
Cast iron pipe File Name: 1-74-1-1-O1.jpeg
==
Description:==
Air dryer rack (IP52-D003B) missing anchorage (similar issue IP52-DO03A)
~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associatc~s, Inc.
Sheet 99 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CC-I Floor El.
586 Bldg.
CC File Name: 1-75-1-1-U1.jpeg
==
Description:==
Anchorage for air dryer racks (at top)
~ŽQ~ Pauli C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Sheet 100 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CO-620 Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CO Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Y N
U N/A
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of X
potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Y N
U N/A
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant X
degraded conditions?
Corrosion on anchors identified in instrument racks base. Judged not to be a concern for operability or seismic issues.
Y N
U N/A
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit X
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC ducts in the area were identified to be rigidly supported Y
N U
N/A
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial X
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Small nut securing floor grating found not fully tightened Judged not to be significant as 8 other fully tightened nuts are present at that interface.
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
IB21N0067C 1B21N0073C
~ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Sheet 101 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CO-620 Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CO Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Scaffolding in area judged to be adequately supported
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Some small diameter piping observed that crosses over to drywell wall support. This piping was judged to have adequate flexibility to accommodate the very small seismic anchor movement loads expected at El.
620.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
- QPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CON SULTANTS Sheet 102 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CO-620 Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CO Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
lile Name: i-3y-i-i-ii.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view r*te Name: I-oJ-=-I_..jpVg
==
Description:==
Corrosion in instrument rack anchorage
'CPattl C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENCIN"fR f H' H. ONLIATNTS Sheet 103 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CO-620 Floor El.
620 Bldg.
CO File Name: 1-66-1-1-13.jpeg
==
Description:==
Loose nut for securing grating.
File Name: 1-71-1-1-13.jpeg
==
Description:==
Mild corrosion identified in anchorage
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
E'.4ANEtR¶ & tXWNSULTANTS Sheet 104 of 139 Status:
(Y N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CO-642 Floor El.
642 Bldg.
CO Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Strut channel that anchors 1/2" diameter pipe is corroded This isjudged as OK since other supports for this tubing are adequate and the span lengths are short if the corroded strut is ignored Slightly corroded anchors found on a wall support for a 1/2" diameter pipe. Judged OK due to small demand loads.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Ductwork in the area identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Drip tray observed over pump and MO V in this area. Tray is attached to overhead pipe and judged OK.
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
ICI IFOI OA ICI IF0160A IC41CO001A IC41FOO01A 1C41F0029A IMI6FOO20A Y
N U
N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
'4 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
I N61,I[ F-Rý & L tONSt [ 1A\\1ý Sheet 105 of 139 Status:
(D N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CO-642 Floor El.
642 Bldg.
CO Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary scaffold and ladders in area judged adequately restrained
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
II I
Y N
U x
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Sheet106of139 ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTI Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CO-642 Floor El.
642 Bldg.
CO Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
File Name: 1-59-1-1-12.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view rne iName: i-ou-i-i-iz.Jpeg
==
Description:==
Surface corrosion identified
D C---
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
EMAINELRS & LO t*5 11Aý-*r Sheet 107 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CO-642 Floor El.
642 Bldg.
CO File Name: 1-65-1-1-12.jpeg
==
Description:==
Surface corrosion identified File Name: 1-67-1-1-12.jpeg
==
Description:==
Surface corrosion identified
LVVYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
[\\('GINERS & CONSULTANTS Sheet 108 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CO-642 Floor El.
642 Bldg.
CO File Name: 1-68-1-1-12.jpeg
==
Description:==
Surface corrosion identified lule Name: l-t9-1-1-i1.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view
Vl-C PPaul C. Rizo Associates, Inc.
1~
'q(PMINEERH&
CO NL: [TA I IS Sheet 109 of 139 Status:
(Y N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area CO-642 Floor El.
642 Bldg.
CO rie IName: I-IU-I-L-IL.Jpeg
==
Description:==
Ladders tied
LKYŽPatil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
EN.GINEERS & CONSULTAN~TS Sheet 110 of 139 Status:
T(
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area EW-I Floor El.
586 Bldg.
EW Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
In the concrete padfor Pump OP54COO02, surface spalling was observed Additionally, 2 of the 4 -5/8" anchor bolts have an edge distance of-4 inches. These conditions are judged OK, as the pump is rigidly supported at the base of the nozzle, which will provide additional restraint.
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Corrosion observed in the base plate for 2H51-P753Bjudged OK because falling would not impact any nearby components. Corrosion observed in ESW Chlorination Skidjudged OK since it is top restrained and a very light skid
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Rigidly supported raceways identified in the area, spanning -lOft. Attached top entry conduit for H51-POIOA observed to have friction-type clamps with no restraining clamps. Friction clamps judged OK due to very small imposed loads.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y
N U
N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Fluorescent light fixture is rigidly supported Lights appear to be twist-in type but are out of the zone of influence and judged not likely to cause spatial interaction. Overhead bridge crane not a credible interaction source. Space heater judged OK due to lateral restraints andflexible lines.
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
0H51P1310 OP49DO001A 0P49F0502A 1P45CO001B 1P45F0130B 1P45F0660 1R24S0032
L~YŽ Piaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Sheet 11 of 139 Status:
t)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area EW-I Floor El.
586 Bldg.
EW Interaction Effects Y
N U
N/A
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic x
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Potential Flood Source in the Area: Pressure Maintenance Tank (OP54A0001). Welded fire protection piping is well supported No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
'ery tall temporary scaffolding noted in area. Temporary unrestrained storage container observed adjacent to H51-POlOA. Items judged OK due to temporary nature.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
- - T Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/20 12
L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENG(INEERS
& AAONSULTAIS Sheet 112 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area EW-1 Floor El.
586 Bldg.
E Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
- W lvile Name: i-)9-l-i-u3jpeg
==
Description:==
Raceways rigidly supported File Name: 1-60-1-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room
Paul C. Rizzo Associate~s, Inc.
i S(N[LRS & CO\\5L LTAN1.
Sheet 113 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area EW-I Floor El.
586 Bldg.
EW File Name: 1-65-1-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of 2H51-P753B anchorage condition File Name: 1-66-1-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Close up of anchorage condition
L~YŽPaul C. Rizzo, Associates, Inc.
I %( INFERS & CONSLITANITh Sheet 114 of 139 Status:
()
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area EW-1 Floor El.
586 Bldg.
EW File Name: 1-67-1-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Scaffolding staging area Pile Name: I-oY-I-i-u:.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of room
LŽ Q VPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Sheet 115 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area EW-I Floor El.
586 Bldg.
EW File Name: 1-70-1-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Surface corrosion identified File Name: 1-71-1-1-05.jpeg
==
Description:==
Storage container identified next to H5 I-POIOA
LXYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Absociates, Inc.
Sheet 116 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area FH-2a Floor El.
599 Bldg.
IB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
I. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Mild surface corrosion observed in base plate, judged not to be a concern.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Piping in area identified to be well braced
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
0G41AO002A
'WY Patul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc.
ENNI~E R'* &I t NSI I TANI I'*
Sheet 117 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area FH-2a Floor El.
599 Bldg.
1B Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Potential Flood Sources in the Area: CRD Flush Tank (1L59A,0001), CRD Ultrasonic Cleaning Tank (IL59AO002), and Fuel Pool Cooling & Clean-Up Surge Tank (OG4IA OOO2A). No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
777-71 Y
N U
N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I I
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) f-
? Z*
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Sheet 118 of 139 ENGINEERS & CONSULTANT'S Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area FH-2a Floor El.
599 Bldg.
I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
B File Name: 1-59-2-1-22.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view File Name: 1-60-2-1-22.jpeg
==
Description:==
Mild surface corrosion identified
Ilk Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
[N(; INE ERý & LON't LAIAN t, Sheet 1]19 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area FH-2a Floor El.
599 Bldg.
IB File Name: 1-65-2-1-22.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view File Name: 1-66-2-1-22.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view
FWŽ VQ Paul C.
Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Li~abb-V ENINE[R', & CONSUL TANTS Sheet 120 of 139 Status:
CY)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area FH-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
FH Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Piping and HVAC ducts in the area identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Rod-hung space heater observed in area. Attached -1 1/2" diameter piping judged to have adequate flexibility to accommodate displacement of heater.
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
1C 1F0083 IP57A0003A
'RIYŽ Pauil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
UNGI'SELPS &~ CONSt I TA\\TS Sheet 121 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area FH-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
FH Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Welded fire protection piping is rigidly supported No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary scaffolding in area adequately braced Cart in the area not restrained, but judged not to be a concern.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
77U7N/
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U xI Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
~ŽQj Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS~
& CONSULTANT' Sheet 122 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area FH-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
F Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
FH File Name: 1-59-2-1-17jpeg
==
Description:==
General view tile Name: i-o3-L-t-i-/.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view
~LYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Sheet 123 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area FH-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
FH File Name: 1-67-2-1-17.jpeg
==
Description:==
Scaffolding clamped to tank File Name: 1-69-2-1-17.jpeg
==
Description:==
Rod hung space heater
L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTN Sheet 124 of 139 Status:
Y N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-la Floor El.
574 Bldg.
lB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
77T7777 Y
N U
N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
0G41CO003A 0G41 C0003B 0G41F0542A 0G41F0542B 0G41F0545A 0G41F0545B 0G41F0546A 0G41F0546B
L1ZQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
PqG IN I RS & L ONMl' I YAý Ilb Sheet 125 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area lB-la Floor El.
574 Bldg.
lB Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Potential Flood Sources in the Area: Fuel Transfer Tube Drain Tank (OG41A 0003) and Fuel Pool F/D Backwash Receiver Tank Receiving (OG50AO022). Fire protection in the area.found acceptable. No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary scaffolding in area is well tied off
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/20 12
~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
F".(,IFERS 6, C0O"SUITAWST Sheet 126 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-la Floor El.
574 Bldg.
I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
B lile Name: l-ý9-1-1--21.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view File Name: 1-60-1-1-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view
L~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
Sheet 127 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-2 Floor El.
599 Bldg.
IB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Y
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of IX potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Y
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant LIX degraded conditions?
Y
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit X
raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Cable trays identified with long rod hung supports. This is judged adequate as there are no vulnerable components in the potential swing area. All piping in area is rigidly supported Y
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial X
interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Lfi noted in the area but not near any sensitive components, judged OK.
N U
N/A N
U N/A N
U N/A N
U N/A Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
IP57F0015A
L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEER', & (7ONSULTAVTS Sheet 128 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-2 Floor El.
599 Bldg.
IB Interaction Effects Y
N U
N/A
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic X
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Potential Flood Sources in the Area: Precoat Tank (OG41AOOO1), Precoat Tank Mixer (OG41DO003), Body Feed Tank (OG41DO004), and Body Feed Tank Mixer (OG41DO005). Fire protection piping is welded and rod hung, judged OK. No concerns identified regardingflood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Potential Fire Sources in the Area: Flammable Storage Cabinets by IB-218 and 1B-211. No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/20 12 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
'4C-Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
E\\NCINEERS & C ONM, LAN11 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Sheet 129 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area IB-2 Floor El.
599 Bldg.
I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
B File Name: 1-59-2-1-14.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view File Name: 1-60-2-1-14.jpeg
==
Description:==
Maintenance equipment identified in the area
~ŽQ-Paul C. Rizzo Asbociares, Inc.
'ql
.NINFER¶,& CONSULTAN-n Sheet 130 of 139 Status:
(Y N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-2 Floor El.
599 Bldg.
1B File Name: 1-65-2-1-14.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of cable trays in the area
Patil C. Rizzo Associates, Inic.
F NG FMI F FONt:LTkM,
Sheet 131 of 139 Status:
Y (9
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-2 (2)
Floor El.
599 Bldg.
lB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
I. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC ducts in the area were identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
IP43F0055
Pauil C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
[NGINEERS & CONSULTAN'TS Sheet 132 of 139 Status:
Y 0
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-2 (2)
Floor El.
599 Bldg.
1B Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Potential Fire Sources in the Area: Flammable Storage Cabinets by IB-218 and IB-211. No concerns identified regardingfire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A I
I x Scaffold structure identified as being used as a support system for a Chiller Unit. Falling of the scaffold on the nearby MO Vjudged not a concern since it will not induce a significant damage to the valve or nearby pipe lines. However, a condition report (CR 2012-12373) was issued to address an unauthorized modification to the plant for a chiller unit.
Y N
U x
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
Paul C. Rizzo Asstwiatcs, Inc.
[M.NI;NcER*' & C.ON'tl Ll.IT*'
Sheet 133 of 139 Status:
Y 0
tU Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-2 (2)
Floor El.
599 Bldg.
1B Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
File Name: 1-59-3-1-14.jpeg
==
Description:==
General View File Name: 1-60-3-1-14.jpeg
==
Description:==
Scaffold structure for chiller unit
Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSI 1 TANIS Sheet 134 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
IB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Fire damper found to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
1 C41A0003
Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
t%(ANUlRS*& C.ONSUI I TANI Sheet 135 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
1B Interaction Effects Y
N U
N/A
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic X
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Potential Flood Source in the Area: SLC Auxiliary Mixing Tank (0C41A0003). Fire protection piping is welded and rigidly supported No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Fire protection piping is welded with rigid supports. No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Ladder tied off, storage barrels judged not a potantial adverse condition.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I I
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/20 12 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
LKYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Astociatcs, Inc.
PNGINELRS & CONSULTA\\Th Sheet 136 of 139 Status:
(ý)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-3a Floor El.
620 Bldg.
I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
B rule Name: i-:)9-i-l-UY.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view rile IName: i-ou-I-I-uY.Jpeg
==
Description:==
View of containers in the area
'CQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
I' NINFELM & COXS1'IIA\\1S Sheet 137 of 139 Status:
(2)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-4 Floor El.
665 Bldg.
1B Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC ducts in the area were identified to be rigidly supported
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Related equipment on SWEL for this area:
IP42AOOOIB
'4C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTYS Sheet 138 of 139 Status:
W N
U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-4 Floor El.
665 Bldg.
1B Interaction Effects
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
No concerns identified regarding flood sources.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Potential Fire Sources in the Area: Flammable Storage Cabinets by IB-406 and in I&C Hot Shop. No concerns identified regarding fire sources.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Scaffolding in area judged to be adequately supported
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U N/A x
Y N
U x
I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Eddie M. Guerra Date:
8/26/2012 Brian A. Lucarelli Date:
8/26/2012
`4ýPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
EM INEURS6, CONS( UNN1S Sheet 139 of 139 Status:
(Y)
N U
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
Area IB-4 Floor El.
665 Bldg.
1 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):
B File Name: 1-59-1-1-11.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view
- a.
aw*
I I~I File Name: 1-60-1-1-11.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of HVAC duct wall penetration
APPENDIX D:- COMPONENT LIST FOR ANCHORAGE CONFIGURATION CHECK Component ID References OG41CO003A Drawing 18_0019-00000_004 OG41CO003B Drawing 18_0019-00000_004 OH51P0039 Document SP-594, page 3 OH51P0193 Document SP-594, page 3 0M23C0001A Drawing 68-0112 0M23C0002A Drawing 68-0112 OP47BOO01A Drawing 414-046, Auxiliary Plan "K" OP47CO001A Drawing 414-046, Foundation Plan "G" OP49DO001A Drawing 22_-0027-00001_008 0R24S0020 Document "Class 1E MCC Seismic Qualification" 1C41A0003 Drawing 413-0237, Equipment Foundation "N" 1C41CO001A Drawing 11-017 1E12B0001B Drawing 21_-0016-00000_005 1E12BOOO1D Drawing 21_-0016-00000_005 1E12CO002B Drawing 21_-0005-00000_004 1E21CO001 Drawing 19_-0004-00000_005 IE22C0001 Drawing 20_-0039-00001_000 1E22S0001 Drawing 417-0067, Foundation Plan "B" 1E22S0005 Calculation 40:71 1E51B0002 Drawing 25-0007-00002 1H51P0871 Document 1-6-7, page 170 IM39B0001B Drawings 69_-0157-00000_006, 48_-0326-00000_002 and 87254-026-54 1M39B0003 Drawing D-512-021 1M39B0006 Drawing D-512-021 and D-512-022 1M43CO001A Detail D Drawing 517-0024 1M43C0002B Detail D drawing 517-0024 1P42AOOO1B Drawing 413-0237, Equipment Foundation "J" 1P42BOO01B Drawing 414-0046, Foundation Plan "E" 1P42CO001B Drawing 414-0046, Foundation Plan "D" IP45CO001B Document SQ-146 1P57A0003A Drawing 415-0107, Detail "A" 1R22S0006-E04 Drawing 058-0596-0000 1R24S0028 Document "Class 1E MCC Seismic Qualification" 1R24S0032 Document "Class 1E MCC Seismic Qualification" D-1
Component ID References 1R25S0033 Document 1-6-7, page 186-187 1R42S0024 Document 1-6-7, page 92-96 1R43SO001B Drawing 417-0066, Foundation Plan "A" 1R45C0002B Drawing 417-0069, Foundation Plan "M" 1R46BOO01A Drawing 57_-0009-00000_004 1R46B0002B Drawing 57_-0009-00000_004 D-2
APPENDIX E: PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SEISMIC INFORMATION (EXCERPTS FROM UFSAR)
E-1
TABLE 3.7-2 METHODS USED FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF CATEGORY I STRUCTURES Category I Structure Reactor Building Auxiliary Building Control Building Intermediate and Fuel Handling Buildings Radwaste Building Diesel Generator Building Emergency Service Water Pumphouse Offgas Building Modeling Techniques for Structures and Foundations Lumped masses and half space equivalent soil spring constant Same as above Same as above Same as above Same as above Finite element Lumped masses and half space equivalent soil spring constant Finite element Damping Soil-structure interacted composite model damping Same as above Same as above Same as above Same as above Soil-structure interacted composite model damping Same as above Same as above Method of Analysis Time history analysis Same Same Same Same Time as above as above as above as above history analysis Same as above Same as above 3.7-57 Revision 12
- January, 2003 E-2
2¢
" *0.5%
2%
20
-A
- 104, x
Z*
.1<
> 2
-Rev.
12- -/3 I A v'-
'k
-I NATURAL PERIOD (sir.)
(Rev.
12 1/03)
(*
PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Safe Shutdown Earthquake Design Response Spectra -
Horizontal Motion Figure 3.7-1 E-3
, \\
- C I \\ N\\0O 5%
N.
, 'IN, It I..
w<
x Z.o 0, A%
W%
x F NATIURAL PERIOD (see.)
(Rev, 12 1/03) t)
PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Safe Shutdown Earthquake Design Response Spectra -
Vertical Motion Figure 3.7-2 E-4
APPENDIX F: PERRY IPEEE VULNERABILITIES ITEM IPEEE IDENTIFIED SPATIAL RESOLUTION CURRENT REFERENCE STATUS OF NUMBER VULNERABILITY PRESCRIBED R
T I
RESOLUTION Panel P872:
one reference table and one drawing rack adjacent to panel PNPP Potential Issue Form 98-0036 relocate table and drawings-believe done by time of 98-0036 Not complete-CR 2012-12331 written; items relocated 1
Control room spatial issues:
Panel P871-FCR 24871 for relocate tables-believe done by Complete adjacent tables resolution time of 90 Complete time of 98-0036 calc secured at top-P800: shelves 36:01.3.2.5.16 inhibited from Complete rev 3 rolling 98-0036 states phone stand is not on wheels P870:phone PNPP Potential as originally stand Issue Form 98-thought-no Complete 0036 overturning-therefore no problem-leave as is P969, P904, shelves P970: shelve calc attached to units on top of 36:01.3.2.5.16 partition wall to Complete rev 3 prevent table overturning PNPP Potential phone attached P870:Phone Issue Form 98-to stand to Complete 0036 prevent falling P601: cart and PIFRA 98-0036-used only Complete monitor 002 during outages PNPP Potential stated not to be Issue Form 98-on wheels and 0036 and calc should not Complete monitor 36:01.3.2.5.16 overturn-used rev 3 during outages P619: cart PNPP Potential Issue Form 98-0036 cart removed Complete 2
Maintenance calc 2.13.9 rev 0 lock wheels proper bench Test Bench storage verified Operations FCR 024978 CR 2012-12222 3
Electrical and PIFRA 98-move cart issued; cart Locker 0036-003 moved 8/7/12 maintain trolleys verified maintain o
Switchgear PIFRA 98-0036-trolleys in in center of trolleys 003 center of bus, busses with hook oist hoist hooked in hook hoistplace F-I
Relays Evaluated for IPEEE I
I Relays Chosen from 1 E22-SO001, HPCS Div. 1 Diesel Generator Control Relay No.
Relay Normal Evaluation Reason Status EvaluationReaso Function is not required during the period of K1 De-Energized Chatter Acceptable strong motion and chatter will not result in this function being available after strong shaking Function is not required during the period of strong motion and chatter will not result in this K2 De-Energized Chatter Acceptable function being available after strong shaking. If the DG is not initially operating, no effect, if it is operating, it may have voltage fluctuations Function is not required during the period of K7 De-Energized Chatter Acceptable strong motion and chatter will not result in this function being available after strong shaking K9 Energized Operator Action Operator Action required to reset K15 (Engine Required Trip Lock Out Relay) CR 2012-12331 written K10 Energized Operator Action Operator Action required to reset K1 5 (Engine Required Trip Lock Out Relay) CR 2012-12331 written K11 Energized Operator Action Operator Action required to reset K1 5 (Engine Required Trip Lock Out Relay) CR 2012-12331 written K12 Energized Operator Action Operator Action required to reset K15 (Engine Required Trip Lock Out Relay) CR 2012-12331 written K14 De-Energized Operator Action Operator Action required to reset EH13 (DG K14________
DRequired Breaker) CR 2012-12331 written K16 De-Energized Chatter Acceptable De-energized circuit or indication only, will return to normal after shaking Function is not required during the period of K18 De-Energized Chatter Acceptable strong motion and chatter will not result in this function being available after strong shaking K28 Energized Chatter Acceptable Indication only, will return to normal after shaking K35 De-Energized Chatter Acceptable De-energized circuit K40 Energized Chatter Acceptable Indication only, will return to normal after shaking K41 Energized Chatter Acceptable Indication only, will return to normal after shaking K42 Energized Chatter Acceptable Indication only, will return to normal after shaking K55 De-Energized Chatter Acceptable De-energized circuit Conclusion from IPEEE Chatter has no significant impact to the HPCS diesel generator control circuits, thereby not affecting the ability for the plant to safely shutdown.
Chatter of the low ruggedness relays is acceptable because the functions of the relay contacts are not required during the period of strong motion and chatter will also not affect availability.
Contacts associated with de-energized circuits AND/OR for indication only will return to a normal state after strong shaking subsides.
Any problematic relays requiring operator action are easily identifiable and can be manually reset.
F-2