ML13003A036

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Report No. MPR-3812, Rev. 3, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page C-155 Through Page C-232
ML13003A036
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom 
Issue date: 11/16/2012
From: Schlaseman C
MPR Associates
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Exelon Generation Co
References
RS-12-173 MPR-3812, Rev 3
Download: ML13003A036 (78)
v • d • e


Text

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (Y) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. ADOI Equip. Class"2 (15) Batteries & Racks Equipment Description 125 VDC Batterv \\

Location: Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 135 Room, Area T3-X.1 I 69 0"*'*'*

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y NEI

2. Is the anchorag?.free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y/f NEI UE-N/AUC s di mg an~sr I6oI4 J'r One' nidc Vs. W'

45 o(Iwr

-,ad

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y< NEI U[] N/AlU oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y-(

NEI UEU N/AUl

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y)X'N-- U0 N/AUJ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verificatio~o is required.)

c evotu i,,ca l-o, o

.n 10-.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YX NEI U[U potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

SC-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrmnnnr1nP.nrNn RR.-19-17.'

C-155

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3AD01 Equip. Class"2 (15) Batteries & Racks Equipment Description 125 VDC Battegy 3N t9 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

UP 4Qfr4c Y4 NEI UO N/AU

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceilingtiles and lighting, YX NO UO N/AU.

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

~IQ-k W011 4S LIoIr a)iA +O 1 0,OI

~

YC

~~P 5 pecAc4-r A/0d M-4 01 Ri

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility, to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YJ NE UEI N/AU YXNO UEl Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y)iri NOI UI--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

~ ;Cy~oA~cx

-;I~

5Ao k5 Lovr~ b6an J&Asi at~

enA

'aI kole v

6

,0t i si f7(qlý i

Evaluated by:.

,_;t-Al Date:

q9l/Iz-Wz~

<C-4 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrp.qnnndpnrap Nn

  • R.-1 9-171 C-156

o -U O~ D 0

CD m

3 CD co 0C0

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:QN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

IDA) 02:

Equip. Class12

(,f Equipment Description 3..

IM-D(

0,Clt"bIA;,v,,

24 0

-, I Location: Bldg. t/R Floor El. J5"1 Room, Area

--4oý 50",e'-/ha (LT3-v?)

11,?II.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions-may be used to record the resuIts of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YEJ#N

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Ix.- bnorot

  • A 5eNQ UQI NIAE
JNO Ufl N/AE1 NEIn UEJ N/AO1 0 NE CUQN/Aýl

ýfNQI ULI noti-/

egc4 be; ml-q//

CrcAfy~ t bVIh A

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4 C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrA~nnndrnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-17.

C-158

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No.

Equip. Class' 2

)_b(

Equipment Description _Vic

_;&id Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

AI0 jt/r-C0I'Z*

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
  • -E U-' N/AC

)...NC UD N/AD Yjj!:C"0 U[:] N/AQ Ydý.NCI UI-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y

N UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated Date:

L LI/

¢,/,

< C-4 >

.1...

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrmnnnrIPnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-17.1 C-159

0) 0 CD 0

CD 0

N)

.4 co)

-r 0

0 0

02 C)0-,

0 CD ciw m

~0 CIO 0C)3 NJ

0 0

CD, 0

z 0

(1) u0

-0 0

023 0

CE R

0 c

m 30 CD ca 0r%)

(A

Sheet I of 2 Status: & N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 3BE55 Equip. Class'2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description RCIC Room Cooling Coil B Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 '"

kll-oom, Area R3-14 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YNEI UDl N/AD]

Y NEI UE N/AEl Y)

N[J UD N/A[l YO NX UO N/AEJ

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which a5 anchorge figuration verification is required.)

  • AJ4O&tei'%j~r 19'riKCi XID~ElyfgrD 1,V 17k.1r-i.YLLL~fL....

l-0 10=IOI 4 ZO

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I IeS'.

I c

YJ& NEIUO WO5 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rTnrrPqnnndPnreP Nn RRA-12-17.1 C-162

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3BE55 Equip. Class12 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description RCIC Room Cooling Coil B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

NEI Ut N/At XA NO UD N/A.

Y)&Nt Ut N/At!

Y1 NE Ut Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NE Ut!

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added. as necessary) s/jA Evaluated by: 9ck~4s*~

Date:

'v// V 0 < C-4 A>

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3

.nrrA-nnnrPnrP. Nn ' RR-19-173 C-163

=rl C. 0 03-m 3a CD C.0 m

0)

C."

C31

Equipment ID: 3BE055 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrqnnndpnr.A Nn" RR-1I-17 C-165

Equipment ID: 3BE055 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r*nrrP..qnnntl.nrA* Nn ' RR-19-171 C-166

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 3BE57 Equip. Class"2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description Core Spray Room A Cooling Coil B Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R3-9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YK'NE].

YX NO UD N/A]

Y0NEI UO N/A[]

YoNEI Ul-N/Al]

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] N1 UD N/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

A(jJ40A0CL D&wsp Wr x~r D1--OJ ~0 S-7,

ý,d T3UTj ACSipDVlir.

e0,L'et5

?

"' I.I W't-V tr-ylb4WOW IV ME-*

PS'-0121, lWav. 61 AWD 2wN40iaQ

,eepr*taT*t*r 3U~

OM*q-)Tg.

O

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YJP-NE Ufl potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3

('nrrP.qnnndr.nr.P. Nn RR-1 9-171 C-167

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3BE57 Equip. Class"2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description Core Spray Room A Cooling Coil B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
q..

YX NEI UQ N/A" 1*k NEI UE N/AO YX NE UD N/AED YNEI U We 64 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

OK CO~i r-10uz 4 -n0,J

/-$4 Jj A 0 C 14 e7JT I IýSW 4DOQe.1ýf6lb Iti

V.1Z tr, 1411 IcjO (OJ4/)Z Evaluated by: OrAw 4

Date:

<C-4>

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrr~mnnnrIdnr.p Nn - RR-19-17.

C-168

-0n

=r 3 O 1

0 W3 0 0l cn m

3 CD

-5.

w m

0C)'

2r 0 a) 0 z Q. E; n

0 I ci m

CA 4.

m 0

(31

Sheet 1 of 2 Status.'-

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID'No. 3E58 Equip. Class"2 (10) Air Handlers A

elZ" Equipment Description RHR Room colung CoilA Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Are R 3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record thd results of judgments and findings. Additional sphce is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YJA NEI of the 50% of 4WE4items requiring such verification)?

44V 0d, 6 "

e,-9 5 Qe, 0.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Ye-NEI UE-N/AE-YfNE UE] N/A[]

YA NEI UO N/A[Q YAN-] U-N/All Y9EN UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812,"Revision 3 rnrrqnnnr1"nri. Nn

Sheet 2 of 2

ý bCO'59 Equipment ID No. iCE5 Equip. Class12 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description RHR Room-& Cooling Coile-Interaction Effects

'/n/0-/

/-

7. Are soft targets free from impact by.nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry blockwalls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

ANO C~d 4~'

L7~

ic-Yo NO UE-N/AEl Y15N-] Un' N/A5

'*1ý

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YJ6 NO UM N/A(l Y'_*NE UE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO"NE] UFI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date:

9 h 1 2

lq I.

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Cnrrm..qnnndPnr* Nn ' R-,-19-171 C-172

=-

ff z

o 0

3)

-4 cn m

3 CD CA m

00

Equipment ID: 3BE058 4&N

-X7 OK Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3

.nrr-.-nnndrPnr. Nn-R5-19-17.

C-174

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

IP ;

pnff~err tnn I Z'ý V-.

Equip. Class1 2 (/5) BATWa-ef kAC~e~S A.afA~~nl~ll ~JX j~fl~fl~.

R X'71-I A..,,

)P' JA1A V

P

-1 Location: Bldg. "Vj2J/

FloorEl. /

Room, Area

,'?*"

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4.

/js the areise cnd-r i

AL 1Z con c n

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

NEI UrD N/AD1 Y"

NEI UO N/AI YiKNEI UI-I N/AF YNUI UOL N[~ I UO

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

S4" CoN,s,,rtAFr,- '

CIVLCý 40C PA -- s"S

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3>

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit.3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 flnrrp-nnndHnr.P Nn

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No.

3Ub PI Equip. Class12 _6)

AiMrrreia t IZWb/?dc,?

Equipment Description

-5" VIbC.

134rm-3 C_

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y)6NO UO N/A-=

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NE U'I N/AOI and masonry block walls notjikely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y N

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

YX NOI UOI N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YM NEIU0 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y

N UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Miq,01ýl tý-

ýSIlo er Evaluated by:

e I

Date:

I&I 6 It)-

/4-e-Ze/1

< C-4 >-

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP.qnnnrinc.

Nn * -RR-12-171 C-176

~CD3 z~ 0 w 0 0

m

~0 C

V2(D

~0.

5 0

0C)

~:1

!oo a) 0

.cn m

CD C)

Equipment ID: 3CDO01 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrr.nnnrlnrA.

Nn

  • Rq-19-17.1 C-179

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&*N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 3CD03 Equip. Class12 (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Battr Charger 3C Location: Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 135 Room, Area T3-170 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used, to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is requirqd.),

t~z1w Ow' o, -I

'?L.,Revt. C( ar TN PO (T4+ Prbc4Aw( Na., 5"Io/ ogW/O&

,f~ 8)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yý(NEI YXNOI YXNO UD N/AEl UD N/AEI YNEI Ui N/AD YX NEI UD N/AD NoL. Jc ]

Y*],ND UJ 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r nrrPnnndfnPNn* R5-19-173 C-180

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3CD03 Equip. Class12 (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Battery Charger 3C Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y' NEI UIJ N/AD]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YRJ NE UD3 N/AL!

and masonry block walls not likely, to collapse onto the equipment?

'rA-4 Nrl

1. M-70oi Rev. I
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, isequipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YX NEI ULO N/AO!

Y NEI ULI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and-found no other seismic conditions that could Y

NEI UL!

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments.(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A/A Evaluated by:

9~zziý7 Date:

L xg Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrQnnnrinr Nn " RS-19-171 C-181

D 0C CD z

o

03 m

30 CD 0

C,,

C) 0

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0)N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 3CE24 Equip. Class"2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger C Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R3-17 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the rýsults of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y4NE YOND UE-N/AL YNOt Ut] N/AL Y4JýN[

Ut] N/AL YWI NEI Ut] N/At]

Y4NO Ut]

12 Enter the equipment classname from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.orrA-nnne1dnn-n Nn

  • R.-1 9-171 C-183

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3CE24 Equip. Class12 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger C Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on thd above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

)ONO UD N/AE YJXNO UI-N/AO YA NE UE' N/A[l Y4 NE UU Other Adverse Conditions 111. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y

NE UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Date:

I f "1

/1 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrPnnnnnrhndnrn* Nn

  • RR-19-17.

C-184

=r

!j. 0 0

CD m

.0 C

-o2 CD

-4.5 C) m 0

= w 0

0*0 CD

.0 C)-o%

.96

N 3~

.- 0

  • 0 S0~

c m

-3 CD 0

m 0N,

StatusL Y)of1U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC).

Equipment ID No30

-5 Equip. Class' Eouioment Descriotion Rgý 0ofi 6

2 14%54 I/~~

Location: Bldg.

Floor El. *-'{':Room, Area K# r-c" Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 37 Instructions for Completing Checklist

'Y/l

/

This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requirinsuchverification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yp NEI Y6NEI ULI" N/AEl Y7 N[l ULI N/AO YPEI YlýNEI UC-N/AD3 UE-N/AD Y 4GE]Ufl 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

  • C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrm.qnnnd~nr.P Nn

  • RR-19-173 C-188

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No.

Equipment Descript

,3 C-,P 0,3S Equip. Class12 V/-

ion U R O

P2 V

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment.or structures?.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y* NCI U* N/AOI Yýr-Ur-N/AE

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is.equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YWNEJ U0n N/AE]

ý4NIH U1n Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YCrNE-1 Ul]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated b3 Date:

2*

/

/~,

/?%

< C-4 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3

(.nrrp'.nnndPnr.P Nn

  • PR-19-17.

C-189

-ý 0 0 3w 0

~

RE z oE; m

n C-o 2

CD c~)C) 0

('3 (31

'D ;oC z F-A 0 0

3 CA 0

-4 ~

0-~

m 3Q CD

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 3CP042 Equip. Class12 (06) Vertical Pumps Equipment Description High Pressure Service Water Pump C Location: Bldg. Pump Structure Floor El. 112 Room, Area P/H-9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment; on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

ND

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

I 4Ac~s 01

  1. w 46;ýOA-

)I '

/4-n--

-m

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YX ND UD N/AD YXgj NO UD N/AO YZN[: UD, N/ADl YJN[-I UD] N/AD1 YND UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3, r.nrrPqnnnHPnr.P Nn* RR-19-171 C-192

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3CP042 Equip. Class12 (06) Vertical Pumps Equipment Description High Pressure Service Water Pump C Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

N 6v-

"e.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YXNEI UEl N/AO YX NE UO N/Afl YX NE UE' N/AO YX NO UEJ Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked! for. and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

JVCLC: Cranir lq(5 6(-M 5er4 A v// -*rnaIo 4 -e.owo, Evaluated by:

411-e.

Date:

Oah'i,/ ]'m ),

1 9

9,1 z I1I W/Tz Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrm-nnnd1nriP Nn* R.-19-17.

C-193

oD a) 0 z

  • 0)

Lcn wJ~

m 30 CD C)

She t Iof 2 Status:

N U Seismic Walkdown Chieckilst (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

__06____8' Equip. Class-2

[

o A

Equipment Description bu

'5 reco,04 mendd

_______04,-0 Location: Bldg.

Floor El.

Roo'= Areq Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of 'an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions niay beused to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YCN M

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yj NE UD N/AC

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y)

NEI UE' N/AC oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y,95-NI' U'- N/AC I4 r

C(V1.4/

I Y1e) lI Tld

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YEI NEI UI" NIA/]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of NC UC' potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I

.W tk 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

  • C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrmqnnndpnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-17.T C-195

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No.

Equip. Class12

(

Equipment Description

-e, S

C 0et" f

(

P 2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, a45rmasonry blqck walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YKNU UQ N/AU YINQ U-I N/AO yýrj UQ N/AQ YfN0 UUI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI*K-NED UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:.

Date:

/

//

,( C-4 )

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 flnrrPqnnndp.nr.P Nn

  • RR-19-173 C-196

=r co a) jý 0 m

  • 0 cn -

m C.0

~0 0C) 00

S D)0

~CD z

0, (3.

0 cn m

30 CD

~00 C-)

0)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&

N U

,Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 3DDO1 Equip. Class12 (15) Batteries & Racks Equipment Description 125 VDC Batter 3D Location: Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 135 Room, Area T3-169 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YXNE Y

NEI UO N/AU Yq NE UU N/A.

1V NEI UU N/AU

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YX NE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

  • frM&"

OCý

"-qvro 4"in e.voo1(iW -I 4:r1 C16 WIciiciqz UD N/AU PS 153) Rev.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YXNE UU 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrmnnnrP.nr.. Nn

  • RRA -1 T; C-199

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3DDO1 Equip. Class"2 (15) Batteries & Racks Equipment Description 125 VDC Battery 3D Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
  • A~h

~~4or YX NO UD N/AEl

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX NEI UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

w POAPý r

A",*. (,ri A

/,.

,F4-40t1 kev., I

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YX NO UD N/AO YJ/NEJ UL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'00 Ni UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) aor v e

  1. 1 nu A

L 40, 4

~4~

Evaluated by:

Date:

211

<C-4>

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 (rnrrP.nnntt~nrc.. Nn

  • RR-19-17.A C-200

OD W j3 0 0

' 3 C4 0.

CD

.0 C)

C)

-A.

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&P N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 3DD03 Equip. Class12 (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Batter Charger 3D Location: Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 135 Room, Area T3-172 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

-0" OVV.

Ate, 0 - 119

-11 ROV. C ari Tii

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NEI YX NO U-N/AO YqNO UO N/AO Y)(NO U-N/AEl NOI UO N/AO ATA NQ.

YX NO UC Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 )

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 CrnrrmnnnriP.nr. Nn " RS-19-173 C-202

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3DD03 Equip. Class"2 (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Batter Charger 3D Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yk ND UD" N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NX UE N/Afl ad masonmy block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

mollkw 0I 5 40 -4 J'OeIJ3 are "M -Md m PIAP5 5'

  • Oae~

41 0k

~

vr1w j

4;et No, M -301) Rev,4 I

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YNE] UEJ N/AD Y

NEI UrI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that. could YRR NEI U1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments,(Additional pages may be added as necessary) s-4-100 IRA r

tec~

~

~ ~ II~S Evaluated by: 00 "W-Date:

< C-4 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 (C.nrrmnnndPnrt,- Nn

  • RR-19-17.A C-203

=-.

0 X

3) 0 3

m

.0

-5.

2(D

=

.-0*5 CA) 0 0

0 0

CA)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: n N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

AO Equipment ID No. AM3-03-33 Equip. Class12 (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd) Valves Equipment Description Scram Discharge Volume Inboard Isolation Valve Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Area R3-22 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YA NEI U-- N/AL]

YA NEI UE] N/AL]

YJZNLi U-] N/AOl J 7NEO! UEJ N/Ag YA(NEI UE]

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 *01 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3

'.nrrPnnnr1Pnr.t Nn

  • RR-19-17, C-205

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. A03-03-33 Equip. Class"2 (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd) Valves Equipment Description Scram Discharge Volume Inboard Isolation Valve Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nerby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls n t likely to collapse onto the equiprnt?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y9NE-UI-N/AOl Y.DNE UI-N/AI-YaNE1 UEI N/AEl Y,&NO UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YfNOl U[:]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

.4 v-.

/

Evaltuated by:

Date: q/ /1//Z I/ ý Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPgnnndnnr.A Nn" RMR-19-173

< C-4 >

C-206

oo

-. 0 z

0 0 -o

'3 CD c) m

(--

3 CD C) 6 6

w 0

w-co

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: & N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

AO Equipment ID No. A6f3-03-36 Equip. Class"2 (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd) Valves Equipment Description Scram Discharge Volume Outboard Isolation Valve Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Area R3-22 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end' of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 59 of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI o

Yg NlI U-] N/A[]

X 4NEI Yý-NEI Ut] N/All U-N/A((

YE-NEI UE] N/A*

NlE-Ut1 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP-nnnr1Pnr.A Nn " RR-19-171 C-208

Equipment ID No.

e S3-03-36 Equip. Classl (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd) Valves Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment Description Scram Discharge Volume Outboard Isolation Valve Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from imact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YONEI ULI N/AEI UEI N/Afl UL N/AOl Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9-VNE] UE3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Date:

Z.!b _Z,

//j-/i a Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrqnnndrnrnK Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-209

K-U0

ul
  • ý 0

a

-g CD CA 6o

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: @ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. H03-23C-5512 Equip. Class12 (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd) Valves Equipment Description HPCI Turbine Governor Control Valve Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 88 Room, Area R3-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage fr e of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO N>(

YAND UO N/AU Y"

NE] U-] N/AD YX[NO U' N/AD YEI NEI U-] N/AX YNE NOi U 12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrPqnnnrPnrp Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-211

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. H03-23C-5512 Equip. Class12 (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd) Valves Equipment Description HPCI Turbine Governor Control Valve Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YKND UDn N/AD Y)' ND UD N/AD YX ND UD N/AD YXND UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

MA/l Evaluated by:

aeoi&

1-ýI-V I.

Date:

Q/lol l

< C-4 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP'nnnrh1nr-.p Nn ' RR-1 9-17R C-212

-ý 0

CD 3

<) >

0 3 CA) m CA

--.v5-

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:ýJ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

C>&* L :.

Equip. Class12 O, *,¢e Equipment Description, L

frW r

/1C/c -t c"rol Location: Bldg.

u r

Floor El.

bu

tRoom, Area

/r-,3____

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may beused to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the followingquestions'mi,'b6 used t0orecord the irest~lts of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO-NLI of the 50% of ýVJEL items requiring such verification)?

V&e 4v. z

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YOND UD N/ADl

3. Is the ancho age free of corrosion that is more than mild surface

't-NOD U'

N/A[

oxidation? )PlS, hW5r ' Ccv If'd*,

13v' q

Zer"/

El

4. Is the anchorage free of w'isible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y-NI-UE:U N/AD YPFND U0I N/AD Yjd NEI U--

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 )>

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrP-.nnndPnr.P Nn

  • R.5-1 9-17.1 C-214

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No.

7Y0(

-I-Equip. Class" Equipment Description

[fCL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not lik to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based 6nthe above seismic interaction evaluatibns, is eqitfpfiaent free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YR-NE UD N/AC Ya NO UDi N/AC Y5NI-UC N/AC AFEC UD Other Adverse Conditions 1i. Have you looked for and found no-other'seisnuic conditions that could

,NC.],UC-'

adversely affect the safety functibns of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

I/f

/

Evaluated by:

Date:Z

.4

< C-4 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrP5.nnndPnr' Mn *RF-19-17.

C-215

-U 0

1-;0 CD 0

0 co m

-3 CD CD

-4

Equipment ID: HCU 06-47 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrAqnnnr1pnre.

Nn

  • RR-I 9-1773 C-217

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:6jN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

"co -J14q-35 -.,

Equipment ID No. 9 Equip. Class"2 (00) Other Equipment Description Hydraulic Control Unit Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Area R3-24 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic'Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YNUJ Y!NL U5 N/A[D Y4~,-NE UO N/AZ XjNU UD N/Al!

  • .NEI UE N/A[l

)(NE UE]

12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<,C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrmnnnrPnr.P Nn* R.R-19-173 C-218

Sheet 2 of 2 d-ICd Equipment ID No. 4 i"!." Ž5I Equip. Class' 2 (00) Other Equipment Description Hydraulic Control Unit Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry bloc walls aot likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Y,§N4 U[ N/AU Ya NEI ULI N/AU YVNE UE3 N/An

10. Based on the above seismic ifiteraction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ye NE UL' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1*. f 2 ~~r-,,,,,-

9 oq~,,A,/L Date:

I/

12--

Evaluated by:

'7 42 p-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rlnrrp-nnndPynn Mn - R.-1?-17.

< C-4 >.

C-219

OD

'0

~.0 m

-aC CD I

0C

(.7'

Sheet I of 2 Statu ON U

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. L13-2-3-113 Equip. Class"2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Reactor Water Level Location: Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T3-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO-NX YI NEI UD' N/AEI YX NEI UD N/AE]

Yj[ NEI UE N/A[]

YEI NEI UEI N/AI Y4 NE Ut]

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrP~nnndrnr.i Nn

-RR--171 C-221

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. LB3-2-3-1 13 Equip. Class'2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Reactor Water Level Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y09 ND UO N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ý, ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collase onto the equipment?

A,,e.

c_,.

. -/z

-V-IL o

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YIE ND UD N/AD Y0NO DEr Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y*i ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

" Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Da te Date

/,P/

< C-4 A>

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rCnrrPannndPnr'.i Nn

  • R5-19-17.

C-222

a)=r co

  • ý 0 40 C:

m 30 CD

Sheet 1 of 2 Status N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LI-9027 Equip. Class12 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Torus Water Level Location: Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T3-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YODNC YK NO UD N/AD YFKL NE UD N/AD Ya ND UD N/AD YO ND ULI N/A14 Y9ND uD 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Cnrrmnnnri-nr. Nn* RR-19-171 C-224

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. LI-9027 Equip. Class12 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Torus Water Level Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y% NEI UD N/AEl

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yk NEI UEI N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

f~lc..s

- cj

,.toc *-/101

-i

/S

/'

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Yýi. NO UD N/AD YM NED uE3.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could' Yg NEI UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional. pages maybe added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Date:

a-01q

/e,-

92A be--ý (t~/'1 /0Q

< C-4>

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPqnnndpn'.P Nn

  • PR-19-17.

C-225

.D 3

00G

a. - 0 CD 0

4 m

3 CD co 4

Sheet 1 of 2 Statusg*N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 46R-9123B Equip. Class12 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Torus Water Level/Temnperature Recorder Location: Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T3-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO 14 Y;K NO USI N/AD YQK NM] US N/AS YW NI] US-N/AS YE-NE] UE-N/Ak Yfit NEI US-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrqnnnHnrA Nn* RR-19-171 C-227

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No.,eR-9123B Equip. Class12 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Torus Water Level/Temperature Recorder Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YCA ND UFI N/Afl

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yp( ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipmenty AMC/tL c-l S We-s 41 W I A

, Us lee 2/-'.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YP ND UD N/AD I.NO UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI[

NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Date: ___ !_________.

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrP.nnndfnrc. Nn ' RR-19-171 C-228

UCDn

-ý 0

'D0 3 (D z

03 -

CA 0D

'a m

-o CD

Sheet I of 2 Status:O(D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LS3-23-91A Equip. Class12 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Suppression Pool Level Switch Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R3-11 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Ae-m o u rr-ec
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE]N)

Yý(ND UEJ N/AD Y

NO UD N/AD ND UD N/AD YD NEI UD N/AX Y*'ND UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

  • C-3 >

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 (f.nrrP'-nnnd1nri., Nn - RR-19-171 C-230

Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. LS3-23-91A Equip. Class"2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Suppression Pool Level Switch Intiwraction Effects I eCU 0

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

O N[I UI] N/All

'S61011 cleorane

(+Wrrq UI~~ T-M)*w AQ ~r Cc crf'd-b IC

8. Are kverieaTdquipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry. block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YXNf" UE-N/AOI xY NEUEI N/AD 460'NF UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YXK NO-Uf' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by:

&t4____

Date:

0______

<C-4>

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 (lnrr~mnnndPnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-17.1 C-231
  • ý 0

< >n A-0 cn m

30 CD

-5.

2 CDj w

6-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A036&oldid=5244635"