ML13003A035

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Report No. MPR-3812, Rev. 3, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page C-68 Through Page C-154
ML13003A035
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/16/2012
From: Schlaseman C S
MPR Associates
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Exelon Generation Co
References
RS-12-173 MPR-3812, Rev 3
Download: ML13003A035 (87)
v • d • e


Text

Sheet I of 2 Status: O9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 309.PAQ4.L Equip. Class 1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinetsiin m en I tl hpa rn tin n /i a oV L ,,k e C YJ P , q r Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 88 Room, Area R3-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEJ N)()XNE- UD- N/AEI YQNEI UO N/AO Y NE-I U[-] N/AE1 YO Nil UEJ N/A)YWINO U[O 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP-nnndPnm-.

Nn

  • RR-19-173 C-68 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. -3 PA Equip. Class 1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description HPCI u" Au/ LuYr 0;) ý Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YXND UD N/AD I ND UD N/AD Y' NE ULI N/AD D Y) NEIUO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YA ND UD'adversely.

affect the safey functions of the equipment?

rv k 4 91 1.Optpq 6 er '0~Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N]A Evaluated by: Date: 9j1117(1?< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 ,nrri-nnnrI~nrP.

Nn

  • R,-I 9-17.1 C-69 0 n3 m.0 C*0 2 (D 0 0 c~)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30D37 Equip. Class 2 (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Static Inverter Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 135 Room, Area T3-74 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YLI N.9 Y,)(NE]UEC N/A[]Yy NEI UQ- N/Afl Y~qNEI UD N/AC YE NO Ufl N/ACx XWNC UED 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 ,nrrp5nnAnlt.nrl.p Nn

  • Rq-197.'A C-71 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 30D37 Equip. Class 1 2 (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Static Inverter Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YK' ND-c c (Co,4Ed re On l 01 arJe id 4")ov y UD N/AD 1c11 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX ND UD N/AD ND UD N/AD YXNO UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as. necessary)

P/A Evaluated by Or Date: C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPnnnd nrP Nn* Rq-19-17.C-72

,-~ 0~z ~* 0~* C)~3 -u-CD~. C',-.1 5~5 C m 0 C)C.0 0 CA) 2-(D-3 CA)0 cn 0 m.0 C V 2 CD-I.5 CJ 3 0 0-.1 Sheet 1 of 2 Status& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30P033, 30P038*7 Equip. Class 1 2 (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description HPCI Booster Pump, Pump, tFr" Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 88 Room, Area R3-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is reguired)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YKNEI Y* NEI U- N/A]YXýN[ U- N/Al YX~NO UEI N/Al NO UO N/AEI NEO UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 ,nrrqnnnrI.nrP Nn

  • RR-19-17.C-75 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 30P033, 30P038A- Equip. Class 1 2 (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description HPCIBooster Pump, Pump, an.d T'bTwSi,;.-t qftc/,, Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above, seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y'XNI UEI N/AOl YLN NEI UE- N/AEl YX NEI UO N/AO-Y).(Nil U[ -Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ykg NEI UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by: Date:/ ýI A5-D1i0120ZOL Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrm-nnndrnrP.

Nn -R5-19-17.C-76 oD*ý 0 0 m c..m 3a CD C)CD,.0 90 CA)CD)0 00 X' 3 z o** 0:i4 -:13 m 3-o C)CIO 0 C.0.0 0 C,)co A =r 0 3o 3 0 0 C)CA)90 C)3 00 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 9N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30P036 & 30S038 Equip. Class" (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description RCIC Pump & Turbine Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 88 Room, Area R3-14 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of. the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YXNEJ YXNEI UE- N/A Y(N5 UEJ N/AEUFI N/A[l Y)< N['- UOI N/A[l YX NEI UE 12Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 flnrrF-nnndHnr.

Nn* RR-19-173 C-80 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 30P036 & 30S038 Equip. Class" (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description RCIC Pump & Turbine Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from in Tui A-le qr~ e 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

WO ) )-l01 i. s 4 1-rdcpe r P(SAP5 G UL N/AD 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YA NEI UE N/AD YX NE UL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N UN I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by:, 9~1 44/-1. .0 I r Date: qt hI/ [I -Q/nI otz<C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Nn

  • R5-1?-17.1 C-81 A CA)-3 (D< .>d-J 0 3 5.0.0 C)90 CA)C/)CA)00

-.0 X 0 CD CA 0 0 m C)CA)w 90 CA)C)CA)0 CD,

.She.a iof 2 Status: UY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30SOS9' Equip. Classl:!(00) OUTc Equipment Description 14 P.CT Tv kinre.Location:

Bldg. __O___ Floor El. 9 Room, Area 13ý -Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

-A(5 1 # M. .- S -L t NV 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YCKNEI UD N/AQ Yk NE UJ N/A[Y3 NE UO N/AO NEI UO N/AOW Q/1i/)o;)YXNOI UEI 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.( C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP.qnnndPnrp Nn

  • RR-19-17.'

C-84 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. _______) __ Equ Equipment Description I- PCI ToA"c.(oo')ip. Class 1 2 0~4Ke Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y]f NEI U0 N/AD1 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y]K NO U0 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YX ND UD N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y% ND UI-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yý'NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al/A#, Evaluated by: Date: o/W / -0),< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 ('nrrqnnnrInrP Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-85 OD* CD z -m 3o CD C)co 40

-w-~0* 0 Lcn 0 m 3a CD CD C,,-4 OD ai*ý 0 33 --0 ji m 3o CD CD 0 CA)-4 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:'5 N U Seismic Walkdown checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 3iS .5 ,3 Equip. Class'2 Eauioment Description I 7(Z V ptvil 6 I 30Y0?3,5 -rr~ad.,/"Vt'Location:

Badg.'L .Floor El. ILS Room, Area --q 'is 30 Y2855 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.,, is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] r YO%--N Ui-1 N/AO YgNE U0 N/AO YIJNO U0- N/AQ YE' NE U0 N/As YKND U3 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrqnnnrdnr.s Nn " RR-19-171 C-89 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 39" Equip. Class12."1I Equipment Description I -V (Ac!J f/01*,:l l÷;4M (5 o0Vc3_ýrýInteraction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

y nery eqimn or" t 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y,$NE UD N/AO YLD Uf N/AO A4101-7/1 L CVWCýgrl P;-S.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y& NEIUD N/AOUD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YVI -NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: ( C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPnnndPnrt.P Nn

(,)!j. 0 2 o*0)0 Lcn m 30 CD cn 0 CIO Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (BN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30X030 Equip. Class" 2 (04) Transformers Equipment Description Load Center E134 Transformer Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 165 Room, Area. R3-t116 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist-Thii checklist may be usedto document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following quesitibns' may be used to, record the results of judgments and findings. -Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YA&ND 2. Is the ahorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose har~lware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?.NEI UI N/AD YA- NEI*NEI uE1 N/AD UEI N/A[]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YX( NND UD N/A[](Note:. This question only applies if the item, is one -of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

ft O Ce k-,lfftrt Ce.-/ (0. V.- & ccc 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y 0ND UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

l\]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrm.ýnnnd1~nn.p Nn

  • RR-1 9-1773 C-92 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 30X030 Equip. Class 1 2 (04) Transformers Equipment Description Load Center E134 Transformer Interaction Effects 7. Are soft aRgets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to cqllapse onto the equipment?

VI ~ 54417 (dV Vr 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?41*,ýM-NC UD N/ACO YX NEI UC] N/AD AIýWto ke" I -Yr-fi U[-] N/AD r.NO UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y4ýi'-] UI1 adversely affect the safety, functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional..

pages may be added as necessary) e kte."- -t4"Oý'Y", Evaluated by: Dateý<C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrPAnnndPnr.-

Nn ' RR-19-17.C-93

-0C-0 CA ,Jo 00 c;o 0 z r. E;0J 3 5.4 m 3 CD X C)00 Sheet 1 of 2 Status/")

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30X033 Equip. Class'2 (04) Transformers Equipment Description Load Center E434 Transformer Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 165 'R'oim Area R3-41 """ Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This .chedklist may be used t9 document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to rec6rd the .results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the. end of this cheeklist for docu'menting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] N[q of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y4j NEI AhiVA 5 4 tQ L t SOC, C' " &14ea& " .UD N/AD 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Nbte: This question only ipplies if the itemh is ne' of the 50% for, which an anchorage configuration verification, is. required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y.[ NEI ULi N/AD YNDI U[:I N/AD Yz'-E NDU N/AU Y4.q1E UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP.qnnndAnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-17.C-95 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 30X033 eEquip. Class'" (N Transformers Equipment Description Load Center E434 Transformer Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearbyequipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YAND UE N/Ar-YV-NEI UEI N/AEI 1" fe t10,zo YO NEI U- N/AEI NEI UE1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YA NEI UE" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments , tional pa may be added as necessary)

If Evaluated by:oT- -.V Date: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rlnrrPQnnndPnr'.

Nn

  • P.R-19-171 C-96
r. -0(a )z C)CD m-3 CD C.0 C,)X, Sheet 1 of 2 Status:6 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30X133 Equip. Class'2 (04) Transformers Equipment Description Panel 30Y33 Transeormer nd e Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. )ýQ 135 gRoom, Area TD-N t-]Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YOJ NX NEI U- N/AO Y; NO U- N/AO vX NEI UO N/AO YO NEIUO N/A)14 YXNd UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 CrnrrR-nnnHPlnr.P Nn -R;-19A-17.

C-98 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 30X133 Equip. Class'2 (04) Transformers Equipment Description Panel 30Y33 Transformer Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

'No ~i xý NEI UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y)4 NE! UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

N (Mck wolis 40.Q 11) D-0 are 5A Y rejJ pe-w4enNo. 1IKO(- Reav. I.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?*0 onJu;4 #Z bC) eoch-?,narqg Y*NEI UD N/AD Y'N UD u+0-Mo > W4(e Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX ND UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date:c/5 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Cnrrl-nnndrnrA.

Nn

  • R5 T17I C-99

-w=r coC(* 0 z -u 0~('T 0 C: m.0 3(D C.0 0 x X ~C 0 3.0* 0 co-m-3 CD-.0 C)X Sheet 1 of 2 Status: & N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 30 0 Equip. Class 1 2 (14) Distribution Panels Equipment Description 120VA4C Distribution Panel Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 150 Room, Area T3-81 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YL 4 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more thanmild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verficatipn is required.)"b. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the aichorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
  • (i-f " -O 471- f&-4N U- N/Al Ye-NE UEI N/AO Y)NIi-- UEJ N/ALl YEI NEI U[]N/AA NE -vi~I
  • F 1 33,c 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rlnrrP~nnndp.nc.p Nn* RR-19-17.1 C-102 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 30YV50 Equip. Class1 2 (14) Distribution Panels Equipment Description 120 V A C Distribution Panel Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y. NE UEZ N/AZ YkNZ UO N/AZ ,ve 7IE$CdLCA-i(4ý*,I-

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YRNEI U' N/AZ1 YfNE UZI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yý .N UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated b3 14,j~.Date: 7; < C-4 A>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Nn

  • RR-19-17.1 C-103 D-g 0-ý 0 z"0 cn 04~c m (D C)4.n 0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)V Equipment ID No. 30Y35 Equip. Class 1 2 (14) Distribution Panels Equipment Description 3PPD 125 VDC Distribution Panel 3C Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Area R3-29 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YL1 N 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y$NNEI UE- N/AEI Yi NEI UI N/ADJ Y4JNE1 Ufl N/ADl YK ND] UI- N/Ap KNEI UL3 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrri-nnnr1nr,.

Nn

  • RR-19-17.t C-105 Sheet 2 of 2 0 Equipment ID No. Equip. Class" 2 (14) Distribution Panels Equipment Description 3PPD 125VDC Distribution Panel 3C Interaction Effects 7. Are OR targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YNQI UO N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo, NEI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Ab0 xv7/,r alel*9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid'damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YOND UD. N/AEi Vd-NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y, NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 415-e l-Date: S Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rlnrrA-nnndrnrn-K Nn

  • R.-12-171 C-106 "0U~~-0 3 z 0** 0 C m-3 CD C.5 CD 3 s >)z ~0 3 0 ci)m 3o CD CA).0 0n Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 6) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 3AC65 Equip. Class'2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description' RPS Instrument Rack Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 165 Room, Area R3-40 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YI- YXND U- N/ADl YXNO UD- N/AD.UD' N/ADl YDI NDI UD N/AdýYQ-M'I UD1 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

  • C-3* >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Nn
  • RR-19-171 C-109 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3AC65 Equip. Class" 2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description RPS Instrument Rack Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YX emfiosiN/

I6arf er s CL~ W4 y r~rk~b ~c 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, gl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YX of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NEI UEI N/AO NEI UEJ N/AE'/1 UEi N/AD NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y& NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: i~I Date: Zc (S<C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rTnrrP'nnndAnr.Ai Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-110 0 32 z 0 (4 0 cn 0 m-3 CD CD CA)

-u*ý 0 0 (D m-0 c"a 3 CA 0 0)Cl'

-ý 0< .>* 0 0 m 30 CD 0 0)Cn Sheet 1 of 2 Status. ) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 3 % Equip. Class 1 2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description RHR Room A Cooling Coil.B'.#4 Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 9*-06W," Room, Are'R35 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to docuinent the results qf.th. Seismic Walkdown of an item. of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be b6 record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YK4 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?-- PA¢t;" f,'d A*

.. .. o 4 3. Is the 1 anc rrage free otcorrosion at is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This questiononly applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y11 No.UED N/AE]PN I z- R N NDI Uij N/AD]NI-(NE U-] N/AD YE] NK UE! N/AD/0, qt:ý/I SNL 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrmnnn1nP.

nr.Nn" RR-19-173 C-114 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. '3 ýi Equip. Class" 2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description RHR Room A Cooling Coil.&&Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targesee from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry blqck walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations; is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?/XNEI UD3 N/AD]UL] N/AL YbFNL]UQL N/All-~Nb- U13..." ...... ..t -, .. .. :..........

.... ,.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could IK\NEI U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) iA Evaluate d by: Date: q z I1t,o-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrP.nnnPdnrp.

Kn

  • RR-19-17.1 C-115 0 -0(o ~CD 2. cn 0 c m 30 CD m 0 0i 0 K-p G) -65 a)0 CD C0 M-0 CD ('3 m.0 3 C m 0 C)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 6N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)I -,-lL tIl. 1 /0) -T Equipment ID No. -E Class'2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Horizontal)

Equipment Description RHR Pump +&Seal Cooler /, /7;?,/-Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R3-6--k55" 'Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild s rface oxidation? [a? e " 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YW NEI UE! N/AE!Y NEI UE!*U,4 dt N/AE!Y,(N E!I UE! N/A[E YE NE! UE!Y4 NEI UE!12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 )'Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3.nrrPqnnndPnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-118 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3Bt2*- Equip. Class 1" (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Horizontal)

Equipment Description RHR Pump-3-B Seal Cooler Interaction Effects M/54/7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby Pquipnient or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?ýWNDI UE' N/AEI XN UL N/ADlUL N/AEl Y lE3 UE]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y UFI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: / d q&z Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrpnnnrIi~nr.

Nn* RR-19-173< C-4 >C-119 oD =rC o -0 z S2. 6-. CD cc, 0 c)m CD m o -0 CD CD 0w~OD ,: 0 0 CD m 30 CD m 40k, Sheet I of 2 Status: (ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 3AE55 Equip. Class" 2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description RCIC Room Cooling Coil A Location:

Bldg. Reactor FloorEl. """Room, Area R3-14 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y7L NO YX NEI UEr N/AC]YA NE] UC- N/AC]YX NEI UC] N/AC]-*NXUC] N/AE]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is re uired.)6. Based on the above anchorage eva uations, is the anchorage free of Linev Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.-KC-3 >*Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 ('nrrP-nnndpnenP Nn RR-19-17.1 C-122 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3AE55 Equip. Class" (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description RCIC Room Cooling Coil A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

DAo~YX NC UC N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YVND U' N/AC and masonry block walls not likely, to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y*/NO UC N/AC YXNOUa Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y) NC UL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Coj-, I colculd'n Wo. PS CA' ~~3tW' CO 'AJP&14,nUA AlA)JAt01t1Ai)Jr t5T-~tC-~. I, )w 61 5-.jo, Ii I-Reif. a Atfla ,Vj0j%-5j1'L ADDJUýTCD itjjaL2j__

Evaluated by: aNt C/I Date: /"1 ., 9,Z---qla2izar Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rlnrrPqnnndlPnr.P Nn

  • R.0-19-171 C-123 0 -0~x-0)cn L-=oL 0;o -z ~-0 0 CD CD)m-o (3 m 0 o -0(0 0oC 0< .L>z CA clo r:3.U m.o r-.3 CD 5 m 0 CA cn o -g0l oL -.z CD CA)24 .w, *m-3 CD C)CA)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 3AE56 Equip. Class'2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description HPCIRoom Cooling Coil A Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. g " oom, Area R3-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y NEI Y)'ND] UEI N/AD YK ND UD N/AD Y)K ND UD N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YD NX UO N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorag configuration verification is required.)

con,+,;Anc-oof AaesMO W 01wJ~L :# J -5 A -74 Riii2 jet R M ./6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of NDI TUJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 C-127 CrnrrmnnhnPn-.

Nn ' RR-19-171 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3AE56 Equip. Class" 2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description HPCI Room Cooling Coil A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?,A .e 50 6t YXNO UO.N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YF4 NEI UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

.o a e iv e adveqa exbfiPTh Oil a meU /9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YW NO UD N/ADI!V 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YkND UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NE UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A//A Evaluated by: Lose Date: q/i /[ m J< C-4 A>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 ('nrrP..cnnnrlPnr.P Nn

  • RS1-1V7A C-128 o -0 co C', w CL 0< >~, S. 0 z;o -0~co, 4 t 0 3.)m-0 CD E5 m 0 CAI m)

CD 0 CD 0 o) 3 z 6 cn 0~. CD 0 CA m 30 CD m 0 01 0)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 3AE57 Equip. Class 1 2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description Core Spray Room A Cooling Coil A Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 _ Room, Area R3-9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraue 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YNNO)X NO UD N/A[YX NEI UO N/A[XýkNEI Ur- N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YO NIM UE' N/AQ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

411elorAOC b0$"t0- P# J>1 rýZ.o S AY-A'-6kILr 0#-VF1J11Wr4nOA/

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NOI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

22 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrmqnnnldAfnr.

Nn RS-1R'-17.

C-131 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3AE57 Equip. Class 1 2 (10) Air Handlers Equipment Description Core Spray Room A Cooling Coil A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YAND uD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YVjNI" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

UD N/AO 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?T V 5 -UI-J 61,VV ~ i YX ND UD N/AD xgNDI IJ I,;cej)-ýIe 64)Y n~ot Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y>ý ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 0,6NPOVraArtON -eýAg46'ciCA.MC7PRC7,1 Ke 0101-L riz + 1011oz Evaluated by:#41 f It Date:.Ih-IýC- A?/1112(74rz Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 C.nrrP.qnnnnin.A.

Kin -.R-19-171 C-132

-0)~~-~ 0~!~. 0~* 0 r~.)CD~ ci.,.-J ~;.C C.)m-3 CD m CA1 Sheet 1 of 2 Statu- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 3AP035 Equip. Class" 2 (06) Vertical Pumps Equipment Descripti6n RHR Pump A Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R3-5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YINEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y NI] U-II N/AL 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?NEI U- N/AL YýI 2 NO Ylk<NO U- N/Al.U- N/AL lk<NI] U11 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment."C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 (.nrrP,;nnndPnr.P Nn -RR-19-173 C-1 34 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3AP035 Equip. Class 1 2 (06) Vertical Pumps Equipment Description RHR Pump A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YND UD] N/At]O NE] UFI N/At])PEI ULI N/At]Y~dNEJ Ut]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y E- ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 1ADate: 9i Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrri.flnnnrldInr.A Nn RR-19-173< C-4 >C-135 o -0 0-~CD 0 3 CD m CD 0 CA)CA)CA o -0 0)-D 0)o Co-~CD z o 0 m CD CJ 3

.Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 3AP037 Equip. Class". (06) Vertical Pumps Equipment Description Core Spray Pump A Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. Aff 91 o' oom, Area R3-9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results~of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y)< NEI% ND YND UEJ N/AD UO N/AD UD N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YX ND UlD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.* Ow%. *5 --nt 5j-- --S V )6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YX ND UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP~nnnr.nrP.

Nn R-R1 9-1 T7 C-138 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3AP037 Equip. Class 1 2 (06) Vertical Pumps Equipment Description Core Spray Pump A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NEI UD N/AE]'No ;,e 419!ý8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YJW NE UO N/AD and masonry bloCkwalls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YY NEI UI N/ADT 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free UE" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YK NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by:.Date: q-ýAq'201 Z< C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Nn* RR-19-171 C-139 XI 3-. 0 W 0 0 m 30 CD

= w 00 ouw j3 0 b .>~z m 30 CD C,, wa 4 A =r.j)m -0 0 CD C)co 4u Equipment ID: 3AP037 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrm.-;nnntlAnr.

Nn- R5-17-17.C-143 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 3AV083 Equip. Class 1 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description HPSWPump Room Exhaust Fan Location:

Bldg. Pump Structure Floor El. 112 Room, Area P/H-9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?-f'loUAA 4o 5{+jAyci 5-16e 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YM ND YX NEI U[ N/AL Yq NEI UL' N/AD YXND UEl N/AD.YX ND ULJ N/AD: YN$NO U1 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.(C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrA-nnnH~nrP.

Nn

  • RR-19-17 , C-144 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3AV083 Equip. Class 1 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description HPSWPump Room Exhaust Fan Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?,to 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NEI UEI N/AD YXEND UEJ N/AD Y 'brND UEJ N/AD Y4 ND UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments .(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/VIA Evaluated by: 6 Date: o 1 gL.q L~IIq t 2 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPnnnrl-nr.F.

Nn" RRA9-171 C-145 o -u CD CDc to :=0 CD 3D z on p, 0 CD-:E m 30 CD CIO 00 CA)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 3BC27 ý " Equip. Class" (20) Contr9l Panels & Cabinets tmo i Cor Vol 131Ql.Equipment Description 2C-4 Cabinet Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T3-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

'1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, mis ing or loose hardware?.... floort 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE N)N YT NE UE- N/AE Y6 NE U- N/Al YK NEI U- N/AOl YE NO U- N/Aff YNEI u 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

ýKC-3>-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrP..qnnndi1nr., Nn

  • R-19-171 C-147 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 3BC27t- Equip. Class' (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description HPC+-Steam&Leak Deuede* Cabinet Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

AJ) 0 P / a " 41 NE] Ufl N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y) NO UD N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NE UO N/AO Y/ NE UD".Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could 'I' NE] UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: ,": .-.*!ýý 4 cle 7 / 2-S//12-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 f.nrrP'-nnndPnrnp Nn

  • RR-t9-173 C-148

-0)CL o a z ~;o -0~Scn 0 C.)m~0 C.-5.4 0 0- w CD0 s >*cn 0 Scn 0 2.wo m CD 0 0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status.ý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)V Equipment ID No. 3BQ65 Equip. Class 1 2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description RPS Instrument Rack Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Area R3-29 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to docurrient the reýsults of the Seismic Walkdo.wn of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the f6llowing questions may be used to record the rekilts 6fjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YD NIý2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? .Yf ND Ui N/AD 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y,.END UD N/AD YAND UD N/AD YD ND UD N/A IND UD 2Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 *01 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP.nnndPnr.P Nn

  • RS-19-171 C-151 Sheet 2 of 2 0 Equipment ID No. 3B!45 Equip. blass12 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description RPS Instrument Rack Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the etuipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y4ND UD N/AD Y)I Z-N n UD N/AD YND UD N/AD Y02ND UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y4-ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: I2/ S' //L-__Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrr.nnnd~nreP Nn

  • RR-19-173 C-152 0 0.-.0 0 CD*. 0 0-a 0 CD 0 C.CD C)0)01 o -.a 0 CL 0 (D 20 0 CA) 0.-0 CD)m C)C)p)C",
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A035&oldid=1362768"