NG-12-0487, 10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Study for the Duane Arnold Energy Center

10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Study for the Duane Arnold Energy Center

ML13002A333
Person / Time
Site:	Duane Arnold
Issue date:	12/21/2012
From:	Anderson R L NextEra Energy Duane Arnold
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NG-12-0487
Download: ML13002A333 (22)

Text

,NExTera" ENER Y 5,oeI4 December 21, 2012 NG-12-0487 10 CFR 50.4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Duane Arnold Energy Center Docket 50-331 License No. DPR-49 10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Study for the Duane Arnold Energy Center Pursuant to Part 50.4 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 50.4), NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC hereby submits the evacuation time estimate study (ETE) for the Duane Arnold Energy Center. This study is submitted in accordance with the requirements of Appendix E,Section IV.4 to Part 50 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

The regulation requires the licensee to submit an updated study "within 365 days of the later of the date of the availability of the most recent decennial census data from the U.S. Census Bureau or December 23, 2011." The Duane Arnold Energy Center ETE was developed in accordance with the federal guidance in NUREG/CR-7002 (SAND2010-0016P), "Criteria for Development of Evacuation Time Estimate Studies," published November 2011.Enclosure 1 contains the completed NUREG/CR 7002 Appendix N, Table N-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist for the Duane Arnold Energy Center ETE. Enclosure 2 contains a compact disc (CD) of the Duane Arnold Energy Center ETE study. The CD is formatted in a manner consistent with "Guidance for Electronic Submissions to the NRC." This letter contains no new Regulatory Commitments and no revision to existing Regulatory Commitments.

The enclosed ETE study provides the methods used to derive, for planning purposes, the time for public evacuation.

The study provides an important part of the bases for NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, 3277 DAEC Road, Palo, IA 52324 Document Control Desk December 21, 2012 Page 2 of 2 development of protective action recommendations in coordination with the applicable offsite state/local emergency response agencies.Should you have any questions or if additional information is needed regarding this submittal, please contact Thomas R. Byrne at (319) 851-7929.ard L. Ander ons Vice President, Duane Arnold Energy Center NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC Enclosure 1 -Duane Arnold Energy Center EPZ ETE, NUREG/CR 7002 Appendix N, Table N-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Enclosure 2 -2012 Duane Arnold Energy Center EPZ ETE Study (CD)cc: Administrator, Region III, USNRC Project Manager, Duane Arnold Energy Center, USNRC Resident Inspector, Duane Arnold Energy Center, USNRC NG-12-0487 Enclosure 1 ENCLOSURE 1 Duane Arnold Energy Center EPZ ETE, NUREG/CR 7002 Appendix N, Table N-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist 18 Pages to Follow N. ETE CRITERIA CHECKLIST Table N-1. ETE Review Criteria Checklist R Reie Crtei Crteio Addese Comment 1.0 Introduction

a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area Yes Section 1 should be described.

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features Yes Figures 1-1, 3-1 of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be Yes Table 1-3 provided and includes similar information as identified in Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002.

1.1 Approach a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained Yes Section 1.3 during the field survey of the roadway network should be provided.b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, Yes Sections 2.1, 3, 8 large employers, and special events should be identified.

c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control Yes Section 1.3, Section 2.2, Section 9, plans in the analysis.

Appendix G d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be Yes Section 1.3, Table 1-3, Appendix B, identified by name and version. Appendix C Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Crtro Adrese Comment e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be described.

Yes Section 3 -avoid double counting Section 5, Appendix F -4.5% sampling error at 95% confidence interval for telephone survey 1.2 Assumptions

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 1 that the evacuation should be ordered promptly and no Section 5.1 early protective actions have been implemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Yes Sections 2.2, 2.3 Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and include the basis to support their use.1.3 Scenario Development

a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, Yes Tables 2-1, 6-2 should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason should be provided for use of other scenarios.

1.3.1 Staged Evacuation

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in Yes Sections 5.4.2, 7.2 development of a staged evacuation.

1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas a. A map of EPZ with emergency response planning areas Yes Figure 6-1 (ERPAs) should be included.b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs Yes Tables 6-1, 7-5, H-1 considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction in each sector.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Crtro Ad.drese Comet c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations.

Yes Tables 7-3, 7-4 2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four Yes Permanent residents, employees, population groups, including permanent residents of the transients

-Section 3, Appendix E EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. Special facilities, schools -Section 8, Appendix E 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. The US Census should be the source of the population Yes Section 3.1 values, or another credible source should be provided.b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for Yes 2010 used as the base year for analysis.growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE.c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, Yes Figure 3-2"Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for permanent residents.

2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 Yes 1.79 persons per vehicle based on or justification should be provided for other values, telephone survey results -see Table 1-3 b. Major employers should be listed. Yes Section 3.4 Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in L I E Analysis 2.1.2 Transient Population

a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4, Appendix E should be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided.b. The average population during the season should be used, Yes Tables 3-4, 3-5 and Appendix E itemize the itemized and totaled for each scenario.

transient population and employee estimates.

These estimates are multiplied by the scenario specific percentages provided in Table 6-3 to estimate average transient population by scenario.c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4 facilities should be estimated.

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4 Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why values vary should be provided.e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 Yes Figure 3-6 -transients of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution Figure 3-8 -employees for the transient population.

2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit Yes Section 8.1, Table 8-1 dependent residents should be discussed.

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group Yes Section 8.1, Tables 8-5, 8-10 should be quantified.

c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent Yes Sections 8.1, 8.4 residents should be used in the analysis.N-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis d. The methodology used to determine the number of people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided.

Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data.Yes Section 8.5 e. Capacities should be provided for all types of Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 10 transportation resources.

Bus seating capacity of 50% Sections 3.5, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 should be used or justification should be provided for higher values.f. An estimate of this population should be provided and Yes Table 8-1 -transit dependents information should be provided that the existing Section 8.5 -special needs registration programs were used in developing the estimate.g. A summary table of the total number of buses, Yes Sections 8.3, 8.4- page 8-6 ambulances, or other transport needed to support Table 8-5 evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred.2.3 Special Facility Residents a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, Yes Appendix E, Table E-2 lists facilities, type, location, and average population should be provided, location, and population Special facility staff should be included in the total special facility population.

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility Yes Section 8.3 data was obtained.N-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NRCYe Section 8.3,ri Tabeio 8-4esd omet c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided.Yes Section 8.3, Table 8-4 d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles Yes Section 8.3 needed to support the evacuation of the facility should be Tables 8-4, 8-5 provided.e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., Yes Sections 8.4, medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate.

2.4 Schools a. A list of schools including name, location, student Yes Tables 8-2, E-1 population, and transportation resources required to Section 8.2 support the evacuation, should be provided.

The source of this information should be provided.b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle Yes Table 8-2 schools should be based on 100% of the school capacity.c. The estimate of high school students who will use their Yes Section 8.2 personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis for the values used should be discussed.

d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary.

Yes Section 8.4 2.5.1 Special Events a. A complete list of special events should be provided and Yes Section 3.7 includes information on the population, estimated duration, and season of the event.Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR Reie Crieri Crtro Addese Coment b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient population should be analyzed in the ETE.Yes Section 3.7 c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event Yes Section 3.7 should be estimated.

2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for Yes Section 2.2 -Assumption 5 areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles Figures 2-1, 7-1 from the NPP.Section 3.2 b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 Yes Section 3.2 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. Figure 3-4 Table 3-3 c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway Yes Section 5 -Table 5-9 network should be consistent with the trip generation time generated for the permanent resident population.

2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic a. The volume of background traffic and pass through traffic Yes Sections 3.6, 6 is based on the average daytime traffic. Values may be Tables 3-6, 6-3, 6-4 reduced for nighttime scenarios.

b. Pass through traffic is assumed to have stopped entering Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 5 the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification.

Section 3.6 Table 6-3 -External Through Traffic footnote Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-7 KILD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I R Reie Crtei Crtro Addesse Coment 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the Yes total populations and total vehicles used in analysis for Tables 3-7, 3-8 permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario.3.0 Roadway Capacity a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be Yes Section 4 discussed.

3.1 Roadway Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been Yes Section 1.3 conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of Yes Section 1.3 the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the analysis.c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway Yes Appendix K, Table K-1 Characteristics," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided.d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should Yes Section 4 be provided.e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node Yes Appendix K, Figures K-1 through K-41 numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be present the entire link-node analysis provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway network at a scale suitable to identify all Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-links and nodes 7002.3.2 Capacity Analysis Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NC Reie Crtei Crtro Addese Coment a.The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the transportation network should be described in detail and identifies factors that should be expressly used in the modeling.Yes Section 4 b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information Yes Section 1.3, Section 4 should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the Yes Appendix K, Table K-2 total number of intersections modeled that are unsignalized, signalized, or manned by response personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections Yes Table J-1 within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle length, and turn lane queue capacity.c. Discussion should be provided on how signal cycle time is Yes Section 4.1, Appendix C used in the calculations.

3.4 Adverse Weather a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and Yes Table 2-1, Section 2.3 -Assumption 9 the effects of adverse weather on mobilization time Mobilization time -Table 2-2, Section 5.3 should be considered. (page 5-10)b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Yes Table 2-2 -based on HCM 2010. The Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 factors provided in Table 3-1 of should be used or a basis should be provided for other NUREG/CR-7002 are from HCM 2000.values.Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Crteio Adrse Coment c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on streets and driveways, when applicable.

Yes Section 5.3 -page 5-10 Appendix F -Section F.3.3 4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time a. The process used to develop trip generation times should Yes Section 5 be identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the Yes Appendix F survey, area of survey, number of participants, and statistical relevance should be provided.c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be Yes Appendix F summarized.

d. The trip generation time for each population group should Yes Section 5, Appendix F be developed from site specific information.

4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-De KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Crtro Adrse Comments a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times.Trip generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating.

Yes Section 5 discusses trip generation for households with and without returning commuters.

Table 6-3 presents the percentage of households with returning commuters and the percentage of households either without returning commuters or with no commuters.

Appendix F presents the percent households who will await the return of commuters.

Section 2.3, Assumption 3 b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method Yes Section 5.4.3 used to notify transients.

The trip generation time discusses any difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients Yes Section 5, Figure 5-1 potentially returning to hotels prior to evacuating.

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during Yes Section 3.7 special events where a large number of transients should be expected should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population Yes Section 5, Table 5-9 should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network with the general public.Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents a. If available, existing plans and bus routes should be used Yes Section 8.4 -pages 8-7, 8-8. Pre-in the ETE analysis.

If new plans should be developed with established bus routes do not exist. Basic the ETE, they have been agreed upon by the responsible bus routes were developed for the ETE authorities.

analysis -see Figure 8-2, Table 8-10. State and local emergency management agencies reviewed and approved the ETE study including these prescribed routes.b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating Yes Sections 8.4, 8.5 ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents.

c. The number, location, and availability of buses, and other Yes Sections 8.4, 8.5 resources needed to support the demand estimation Table 8-5 should be provided.d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief Yes Section 8.4, Figure 8-1 drivers, and initiate the bus route should be provided.e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit Yes Section 8.4, page 8-8 dependent residents to prepare and travel to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to the pickup point.f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load Yes Sections 8.4, 8.5 passengers should be discussed.

Tables 8-17, 8-18 g. A map of bus routes should be included.

Yes Figure 8-2 Duane Arnold Energy center KLD Engineering, p.c.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Yes Secio 8.5ysi h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, and time to drive Out of the EPZ should be provided.Yes Section 8.5 Tables 8-17, 8-18 i. Information should be provided to supports analysis of Yes Sections 8.4, 8.5 return trips, if necessary.

Figure 8-1 Tables 8-11 through 8-13 4.1.3 Special Facilities

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times Yes Sections 8.4 should be provided.

Tables 8-7 through 8-9, 8-14 through 8-16 b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and Yes Sections 8.4 outbound speeds.c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bounds individuals Yes Section 8.4 should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these Tables 8-4, 8-14 through 8-16 residents should be discussed.

d. Time for loading of residents should be provided Yes Sections 8.4 e. Information should be provided that indicates whether Yes Sections 8.4 the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trips should be needed.f. If return trips should be needed, the destination of Yes Sections 8.4 vehicles should be provided.Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Crteio Adrse Coment g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility residents are expected to pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated to their final destination.

Yes Sections 8.4 h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the Yes Sections 8.4 time elements for the return trips.4.1.4 Schools a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization time Yes Section 8.4 should be provided.b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and Yes School bus routes are presented in Table outbound speeds. 8-6 School bus speeds are presented in Tables 8-7 through 8-9 Section 8.4 discusses inbound and outbound speeds c. Time for loading of students should be provided.

Yes Tables 8-7 through 8-9, discussion in Section 8.4 d. Information should be provided that indicates whether Yes Section 8.4- page 8-6 the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if Table 8-5 additional trips are needed.e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses Yes Destinations

-Figure 10-1 should be provided.Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie Crtei Crtro Addese Coment f. If used, reception centers should be identified.

Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated to their final destination.

Yes Table 8-3. Students are RCs where they will be picked up by parents or guardians g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the Yes Tables 8-7 through 8-9 provide time time elements for the return trips, needed to arrive at reception center, which could be used to compute a second wave evacuation if necessary 4.2 ETE Modeling a. General information about the model should be provided Yes DYNEV II (Ver. 4.0.10.0)

System. Section and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. 1.3, Table 1-3, Appendix B, Appendix C b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE No Not applicable as a traffic simulation calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate model was used the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative Yes Appendices B and C describe the set of model inputs should be provided, simulation model assumptions and algorithms Table J-2 -model inputs b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key Yes Appendix A performance measures and parameters used in the Tables C-1, C-2 analysis.4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NR Rviw rieiaCrteio Adesse Appendixs a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE should be provided.Yes Appendix B b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review: 1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit node.2. Network wide average travel time.3. Longest queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume.4. Total vehicles exiting the network.5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.Yes 1. Table J-5.2. Table J-3.3. Table J-1.4. Table J-3.5. Figures J-1 through J-14 (one plot for each scenario considered).

6. Table J-4. Network wide average speed also provided in Table J-3.c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various Yes Figures 7-3 through 7-8 times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service (LOS) "E" and LOS "F" conditions, if they occur.4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and Yes Tables 7-1, 7-2 100% of the total permanent resident and transient population Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis I b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated data should be explained.

Yes Section 5.4- truncating survey data to eliminate statistical outliers Table 7-2 -1 0 0 th percentile ETE for general population

c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs Yes Tables 7-3, 7-4 similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002.

d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of Yes Sections 8.4 through special facilities, transit dependent, and school Tables 8-7 through 8-9, 8-11 through 8-18 populations.

5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans a. Information that responsible authorities have approved Yes Section 9, Appendix G. The existing traffic the traffic control plan used in the analysis should be memen plns were ed.Nthnges provided.

management plans were used. No changes to plans were identified as a result of this b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic Yes study control plan that affect the ETE should be provided.5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation Yes Section 13, Appendix M time should be provided.b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of Yes Results of the ETE study were formally enhancements to local authorities should be provided, presented to local authorities at the final project meeting. Recommended enhancements were discussed.

N-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 R Reie CrtraCrtro Addesse Comment 5.3 State and Local Review a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction Yes Table 1-1 with these agencies should be discussed.

b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues Yes No unresolved issues after review with the that may affect the ETE. offsite agencies 5.4 Reviews and Updates a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required Yes Appendix M, Section M.3 to be performed and submitted to the NRC.5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers Yes Figure 10-1 should be provided.b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate Yes Section 8.4 discusses a multi-wave return times for buses should be provided, evacuation procedure.

Figure 8-1 c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers Yes Section 2.3 -Assumption 7h are left at the reception center and are taken by separate Section 10 buses to the congregate care center.Technical Reviewer Date Supervisory Review Date Duane Arnold Energy Center Evacuation Time Estimate N-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I NG-12-0487 Enclosure 2 ENCLOSURE 2 2012 Duane Arnold Energy Center EPZ ETE Study (CD)