ML123630620

Kld TR-525, Rev. 1, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Development of Evacuation Time Estimates

ML123630620
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	11/30/2012
From:	KLD Engineering, PC
To:	Edison International Co, Southern California Edison Co, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
KLD TR-525, Rev 1
Download: ML123630620 (497)

Text

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Development of Evacuation Time Estimates Work performed for Southern California Edison, by:

KLD Engineering, P.C.

43 Corporate Drive Hauppauge, NY 11788 mailto:kweinisch@kldcompanies.com November 2012 Final Report, Rev. 1 KLD TR - 525

Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 11 1.1 Overview of the ETE Process...................................................................................................... 12 1.2 The SONGS Plant Location ......................................................................................................... 14 1.3 Preliminary Activities ................................................................................................................. 16 1.4 Comparison with Prior ETE Study ............................................................................................ 110 2 STUDY ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS............................................................................................. 21 2.1 Data Estimates ........................................................................................................................... 21 2.2 Study Methodological Assumptions .......................................................................................... 22 2.3 Study Assumptions ..................................................................................................................... 25 3 DEMAND ESTIMATION ....................................................................................................................... 31 3.1 Permanent Residents ................................................................................................................. 32 3.2 Shadow Population .................................................................................................................... 37 3.3 Transient Population ................................................................................................................ 310 3.4 Seasonal Transient Population................................................................................................. 311 3.5 Employees ................................................................................................................................ 314 3.6 Medical Facilities ...................................................................................................................... 318 3.7 Total Demand in Addition to Permanent Population .............................................................. 318 3.8 Special Event ............................................................................................................................ 318 3.9 Summary of Demand ............................................................................................................... 321 4 ESTIMATION OF HIGHWAY CAPACITY................................................................................................ 41 4.1 Capacity Estimations on Approaches to Intersections .............................................................. 42 4.2 Capacity Estimation along Sections of Highway ........................................................................ 44 4.3 Application to the SONGS Study Area ........................................................................................ 46 4.3.1 TwoLane Roads ................................................................................................................. 46 4.3.2 MultiLane Highway ........................................................................................................... 46 4.3.3 Freeways ............................................................................................................................ 47 4.3.4 Intersections ...................................................................................................................... 48 4.4 Simulation and Capacity Estimation .......................................................................................... 48 5 ESTIMATION OF TRIP GENERATION TIME .......................................................................................... 51 5.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 51 5.2 Fundamental Considerations ..................................................................................................... 53 5.3 Estimated Time Distributions of Activities Preceding Event 5 ................................................... 56 5.4 Calculation of Trip Generation Time Distribution .................................................................... 511 5.4.1 Statistical Outliers ............................................................................................................ 512 5.4.2 Staged Evacuation Trip Generation ................................................................................. 515 5.4.3 Trip Generation for Waterways and Recreational Areas ................................................. 516 6 DEMAND ESTIMATION FOR EVACUATION SCENARIOS ..................................................................... 61 7 GENERAL POPULATION EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATES (ETE) .......................................................... 71 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station i KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

7.1 Voluntary Evacuation and Shadow Evacuation ......................................................................... 71 7.2 Staged Evacuation ...................................................................................................................... 71 7.3 Patterns of Traffic Congestion during Evacuation ..................................................................... 72 7.4 Evacuation Rates ........................................................................................................................ 74 7.5 Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) Results .................................................................................... 75 7.6 Staged Evacuation Results ......................................................................................................... 77 7.7 Guidance on Using ETE Tables ................................................................................................... 78 8 TRANSITDEPENDENT AND SPECIAL FACILITY EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATES ................................. 81 8.1 Transit Dependent People Demand Estimate ............................................................................ 82 8.2 School Population - Transit Demand ......................................................................................... 84 8.3 Medical Facility Demand ............................................................................................................ 84 8.4 Evacuation Time Estimates for Transit Dependent People ....................................................... 85 8.5 Registered People with Disabilities and Others with Access and Functional Needs ............... 811 9 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STRATEGY ................................................................................................... 91 10 EVACUATION ROUTES .................................................................................................................. 101 11 SURVEILLANCE OF EVACUATION OPERATIONS ........................................................................... 111 12 CONFIRMATION TIME .................................................................................................................. 121 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ii KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

List of Appendices A. GLOSSARY OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TERMS .................................................................................. A1 B. DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT AND DISTRIBUTION MODEL ......................................................... B1 C. DYNEV TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODEL ............................................................................................... C1 C.1 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. C5 C.1.1 The Fundamental Diagram ................................................................................................. C5 C.1.2 The Simulation Model ........................................................................................................ C5 C.1.3 Lane Assignment .............................................................................................................. C13 C.2 Implementation ....................................................................................................................... C13 C.2.1 Computational Procedure ................................................................................................ C13 C.2.2 Interfacing with Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTRAD) ................................................... C16 D. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STUDY PROCEDURE .............................................................................. D1 E. SPECIAL FACILITY DATA ...................................................................................................................... E1 F. TELEPHONE SURVEY ........................................................................................................................... F1 F.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... F1 F.2 Survey Instrument and Sampling Plan ....................................................................................... F2 F.3 Survey Results ............................................................................................................................ F3 F.3.1 Household Demographic Results ........................................................................................... F3 F.3.2 Evacuation Response ............................................................................................................. F8 F.3.3 Time Distribution Results ..................................................................................................... F10 F.4 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. F12 G. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN .......................................................................................................... G1 G.1 Traffic Control Points ................................................................................................................ G1 H. EVACUATION REGIONS ..................................................................................................................... H1 J. REPRESENTATIVE INPUTS TO AND OUTPUTS FROM THE DYNEV II SYSTEM ..................................... J1 K. EVACUATION ROADWAY NETWORK .................................................................................................. K1 L. PAZ BOUNDARIES ............................................................................................................................... L1 M. EVACUATION SENSITIVITY STUDIES ............................................................................................. M1 M.1 Effect of Changes in Trip Generation Times ............................................................................ M1 M.2 Effect of Changes in the Number of People in the Shadow Region Who Relocate ................. M2 M.3 Effect of Changes in EPZ Resident Population ......................................................................... M3 N. ETE CRITERIA CHECKLIST ................................................................................................................... N1 Note: Appendix I intentionally skipped San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station iii KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

List of Figures Figure 11. SONGS Location ...................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 12. SONGS LinkNode Analysis Network ....................................................................................... 18 Figure 21. Voluntary Evacuation Methodology ....................................................................................... 24 Figure 31. SONGS EPZ .............................................................................................................................. 33 Figure 32. Permanent Resident Population by Sector ............................................................................. 35 Figure 33. Permanent Resident Vehicles by Sector ................................................................................. 36 Figure 34. Shadow Population by Sector ................................................................................................. 38 Figure 35. Shadow Vehicles by Sector ..................................................................................................... 39 Figure 36. Transient Population by Sector............................................................................................. 312 Figure 37. Transient Vehicles by Sector ................................................................................................. 313 Figure 38. Employee Population by Sector ............................................................................................ 316 Figure 39. Employee Vehicles by Sector ................................................................................................ 317 Figure 41. Fundamental Diagrams .......................................................................................................... 410 Figure 51. Events and Activities Preceding the Evacuation Trip .............................................................. 55 Figure 52. Evacuation Mobilization Activities ........................................................................................ 510 Figure 53. Comparison of Data Distribution and Normal Distribution....................................................... 513 Figure 54. Comparison of Trip Generation Distributions....................................................................... 519 Figure 55. Comparison of Staged and Unstaged Trip Generation Distributions .................................. 522 Figure 61. SONGS EPZ PAZs...................................................................................................................... 64 Figure 62. NonRetrofitted Bridge Structures in the SONGS EPZ ............................................................ 69 Figure 71. Voluntary Evacuation Methodology ..................................................................................... 718 Figure 72. SONGS Shadow Region ......................................................................................................... 719 Figure 73. Congestion Patterns at 30 Minutes after the Advisory to Evacuate .................................... 720 Figure 74. Congestion Patterns at 1 Hour after the Advisory to Evacuate ............................................ 721 Figure 75. Congestion Patterns at 2 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate .......................................... 722 Figure 76. Congestion Patterns at 3 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate .......................................... 723 Figure 77. Congestion Patterns at 4 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate .......................................... 724 Figure 78. Congestion Patterns at 6 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate .......................................... 725 Figure 79. Congestion Patterns at 6 Hours, 20 Minutes after the Advisory to Evacuate ....................... 726 Figure 710. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 1 for Region R03 .................................................... 727 Figure 711. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 2 for Region R03 .................................................... 727 Figure 712. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 3 for Region R03 .................................................... 728 Figure 713. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 4 for Region R03 .................................................... 728 Figure 714. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 5 for Region R03 .................................................... 729 Figure 715. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 6 for Region R03 .................................................... 729 Figure 716. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 7 for Region R03 .................................................... 730 Figure 717. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 8 for Region R03 .................................................... 730 Figure 718. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 9 for Region R03 .................................................... 731 Figure 719. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 10 for Region R03 .................................................. 731 Figure 720. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 11 for Region R03 .................................................. 732 Figure 721. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 12 for Region R03 .................................................. 732 Figure 722. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 13 for Region R03 .................................................. 733 Figure 81. Chronology of Transit Evacuation Operations ...................................................................... 812 Figure 82. TransitDependent Bus Routes in PAZ 4 ............................................................................... 813 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station iv KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 83. TransitDependent Bus Routes in PAZ 5 ............................................................................... 814 Figure 84. TransitDependent Bus Routes in PAZs 1 and 3.................................................................... 815 Figure 101. General Population and School Reception Centers ............................................................ 102 Figure 102. Evacuation Routes .............................................................................................................. 103 Figure B1. Flow Diagram of SimulationDTRAD Interface........................................................................ B5 Figure C1. Representative Analysis Network ........................................................................................... C4 Figure C2. Fundamental Diagrams ........................................................................................................... C6 Figure C3. A UNIT Problem Configuration with t1 > 0 .............................................................................. C7 Figure C4. Flow of Simulation Processing (See Glossary: Table C3) .................................................... C15 Figure D1. Flow Diagram of Activities ..................................................................................................... D5 Figure E1. Schools within the EPZ .......................................................................................................... E11 Figure E2. Preschools and Daycares within the EPZ .............................................................................. E12 Figure E3. Medical Facilities within the EPZ .......................................................................................... E13 Figure E4. Recreational Areas within the EPZ ........................................................................................ E14 Figure E5. Lodging Facilities within the EPZ ........................................................................................... E15 Figure E6. Lodging Facilities in the San Clemente Area ......................................................................... E16 Figure F1. Household Size in the EPZ ....................................................................................................... F3 Figure F2. Household Vehicle Availability ................................................................................................ F4 Figure F3. Vehicle Availability 1 to 5 Person Households ...................................................................... F5 Figure F4. Vehicle Availability 6 to 9+ Person Households .................................................................... F5 Figure F5. Household Ridesharing Preference......................................................................................... F6 Figure F6. Commuters in Households in the EPZ ..................................................................................... F7 Figure F7. Modes of Travel in the EPZ ..................................................................................................... F8 Figure F8. Number of Vehicles Used for Evacuation ............................................................................... F9 Figure F9. Households Evacuating with Pets ........................................................................................... F9 Figure F10. Time Required to Prepare to Leave Work/School .............................................................. F11 Figure F11. Work to Home Travel Time ................................................................................................. F11 Figure F12. Time to Prepare Home for Evacuation................................................................................ F12 Figure G1. Traffic Control Points for the SONGS Site ............................................................................. G2 Figure G2. Recommended TCP 5A Modification ..................................................................................... G3 Figure G3. Recommended TCP 5B Modification...................................................................................... G4 Figure G4. Recommended TCP 6 Modification ........................................................................................ G5 Figure G5. Recommended TCP 7 Modification ........................................................................................ G6 Figure G6. Recommended TCP 10 Modification ...................................................................................... G7 Figure G7. Recommended TCP at the Intersection of Basilone Rd and San Mateo Dr .......................... G8 Figure H1. Region R01 ............................................................................................................................. H4 Figure H2. Region R02 ............................................................................................................................. H5 Figure H3. Region R03 ............................................................................................................................. H6 Figure H4. Region R04 ............................................................................................................................. H7 Figure H5. Region R05 ............................................................................................................................. H8 Figure H6. Region R06 ............................................................................................................................. H9 Figure H7. Region R07 ........................................................................................................................... H10 Figure H8. Region R08 ........................................................................................................................... H11 Figure H9. Region R09 ........................................................................................................................... H12 Figure H10. Region R10 ......................................................................................................................... H13 Figure H11 Region R11 .......................................................................................................................... H14 Figure H12 Region R12 .......................................................................................................................... H15 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station v KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H13 Region R13 .......................................................................................................................... H16 Figure H14 Region R14 .......................................................................................................................... H17 Figure H15 Region R15 .......................................................................................................................... H18 Figure H16 Region R16 .......................................................................................................................... H19 Figure H17 Region R17 .......................................................................................................................... H20 Figure H18 Region R18 .......................................................................................................................... H21 Figure H19 Region R19 .......................................................................................................................... H22 Figure H20 Region R20 .......................................................................................................................... H23 Figure H21 Region R21 .......................................................................................................................... H24 Figure J1. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 1) .............. J8 Figure J2. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2) ............................... J8 Figure J3. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 3).............. J9 Figure J4. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4) .............................. J9 Figure J5. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 5) ..................................................................................................................... J10 Figure J6. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 6) .............. J10 Figure J7. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7) ............................... J11 Figure J8. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 8) .............. J11 Figure J9. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 9) ............................... J12 Figure J10. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 10) ................................................................................................................... J12 Figure J11. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather, Special Event (Scenario 11) ............................................................................................................................................ J13 Figure J12. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Roadway Impact (Scenario 12) ............................................................................................................................................ J13 Figure J13. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Earthquake (Scenario 13) ......................................................................................................................... J14 Figure K1. Overview of Link Node Analysis .............................................................................................. K2 Figure K2. Grid 1 ...................................................................................................................................... K3 Figure K3. Grid 2 ...................................................................................................................................... K4 Figure K4. Grid 3 ...................................................................................................................................... K5 Figure K5. Grid 4 ...................................................................................................................................... K6 Figure K6. Grid 5 ...................................................................................................................................... K7 Figure K7. Grid 6 ...................................................................................................................................... K8 Figure K8. Grid 7 ...................................................................................................................................... K9 Figure K9. Grid 8 .................................................................................................................................... K10 Figure K10. Grid 9 .................................................................................................................................. K11 Figure K11. Grid 10 ................................................................................................................................ K12 Figure K12. Grid 11 ................................................................................................................................ K13 Figure K13. Grid 12 ................................................................................................................................ K14 Figure K14. Grid 13 ................................................................................................................................ K15 Figure K15. Grid 14 ................................................................................................................................ K16 Figure K16. Grid 15 ................................................................................................................................ K17 Figure K17. Grid 16 ................................................................................................................................ K18 Figure K18. Grid 17 ................................................................................................................................ K19 Figure K19. Grid 18 ................................................................................................................................ K20 Figure K20. Grid 19 ................................................................................................................................ K21 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station vi KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K21. Grid 20 ................................................................................................................................ K22 Figure K22. Grid 21 ................................................................................................................................ K23 Figure K23. Grid 22 ................................................................................................................................ K24 Figure K24. Grid 23 ................................................................................................................................ K25 Figure K25. Grid 24 ................................................................................................................................ K26 Figure K26. Grid 25 ................................................................................................................................ K27 Figure K27. Grid 26 ................................................................................................................................ K28 Figure K28. Grid 27 ................................................................................................................................ K29 Figure K29. Grid 28 ................................................................................................................................ K30 Figure K30. Grid 29 ................................................................................................................................ K31 Figure K31. Grid 30 ................................................................................................................................ K32 Figure K32. Grid 31 ................................................................................................................................ K33 Figure K33. Grid 32 ................................................................................................................................ K34 Figure K34. Grid 33 ................................................................................................................................ K35 Figure K35. Grid 34 ................................................................................................................................ K36 Figure K36. Grid 35 ................................................................................................................................ K37 Figure K37. Grid 36 ................................................................................................................................ K38 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station vii KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

List of Tables Table 11. Stakeholder Interaction ........................................................................................................... 12 Table 12. Highway Characteristics ........................................................................................................... 16 Table 13. ETE Study Comparisons .......................................................................................................... 110 Table 21. Evacuation Scenario Definitions............................................................................................... 23 Table 22. Model Adjustment for Adverse Weather................................................................................. 27 Table 31. EPZ Permanent Resident Population ....................................................................................... 34 Table 32. Permanent Resident Population and Vehicles by PAZ ............................................................. 34 Table 33. Shadow Population and Vehicles by Sector ............................................................................. 37 Table 34. Summary of Transients and Transient Vehicles ..................................................................... 311 Table 35. Summary of NonEPZ Resident Employees and Employee Vehicles...................................... 315 Table 36. SONGS EPZ External Traffic .................................................................................................... 320 Table 37. Summary of Population Demand ........................................................................................... 322 Table 38. Summary of Vehicle Demand ................................................................................................. 323 Table 51. Event Sequence for Evacuation Activities ................................................................................ 53 Table 52. Time Distribution for Notifying the Public ............................................................................... 56 Table 53. Time Distribution for Employees to Prepare to Leave Work ................................................... 57 Table 54. Time Distribution for Commuters to Travel Home .................................................................. 58 Table 55. Time Distribution for Population to Prepare to Evacuate ....................................................... 59 Table 56. Mapping Distributions to Events ............................................................................................ 511 Table 57. Description of the Distributions ............................................................................................. 511 Table 58. Trip Generation Histograms for the EPZ Population for Unstaged Evacuation .................... 518 Table 59. Trip Generation Histograms for the EPZ Population for Staged Evacuation ......................... 520 Table 510. Trip Generation Histograms for the EPZ Population for Staged Evacuation for Region R21 ........................................................................................................... 521 Table 61. Description of Evacuation Regions........................................................................................... 63 Table 62. Evacuation Scenario Definitions............................................................................................... 65 Table 63. Percent of Population Groups Evacuating for Various Scenarios ............................................ 66 Table 64. Vehicle Estimates by Scenario.................................................................................................. 67 Table 65. List of NonRetrofitted Bridge Structures in the SONGS EPZ ................................................... 68 Table 71. Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 90 Percent of the Affected Population ......................... 711 Table 72. Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 100 Percent of the Affected Population ....................... 712 Table 73. Time to Clear 90 Percent of the 2Mile Area within the Indicated Region ............................ 713 Table 74. Time to Clear 100 Percent of the 2Mile Area within the Indicated Region .......................... 714 Table 75. Time to Clear 90 Percent of the 5Mile Area within the Indicated Region ............................. 715 Table 76. Time to Clear 100 Percent of the 5Mile Area within the Indicated Region .......................... 716 Table 77. Description of Evacuation Regions......................................................................................... 717 Table 81. TransitDependent Population Estimates .............................................................................. 816 Table 82. School Population Demand Estimates ................................................................................... 817 Table 83. School Reception Centers ...................................................................................................... 820 Table 84. Medical Facility Transit Demand ............................................................................................ 822 Table 85. Summary of Transportation Resources .................................................................................. 824 Table 86. Bus Route Descriptions .......................................................................................................... 825 Table 87. School Evacuation Time Estimates Good Weather .............................................................. 831 Table 88. School Evacuation Time Estimates Rain............................................................................... 835 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station viii KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 89. Summary of TransitDependent Bus Routes .......................................................................... 838 Table 810. TransitDependent Evacuation Time Estimates Good Weather ........................................ 839 Table 811. TransitDependent Evacuation Time Estimates Rain ......................................................... 841 Table 812. Medical Facility Evacuation Time Estimates Good Weather ............................................. 843 Table 813. Medical Facility Evacuation Time Estimates Rain .............................................................. 847 Table 814. Registered People with Disabilities and Others with Access and Functional Needs Evacuation Time Estimates ......................................................................................... 851 Table 121. Estimated Number of Telephone Calls Required for Confirmation of Evacuation .............. 123 Table A1. Glossary of Traffic Engineering Terms .................................................................................... A1 Table C1. Selected Measures of Effectiveness Output by DYNEV II ........................................................ C2 Table C2. Input Requirements for the DYNEV II Model ........................................................................... C3 Table C3. Glossary ....................................................................................................................................C8 Table E1. Schools within the EPZ ............................................................................................................. E2 Table E2. Preschools and Daycares within the EPZ ................................................................................. E4 Table E3. Medical Facilities within the EPZ .............................................................................................. E6 Table E4. Parks/Recreational Attractions within the EPZ ........................................................................ E8 Table E5. Lodging Facilities within the EPZ .............................................................................................. E9 Table F1. San Onofre Telephone Survey Sampling Plan .......................................................................... F2 Table H1. Percent of SubArea Population Evacuating for Each Region................................................. H2 Table J1. Characteristics of the Ten Highest Volume Signalized Intersections........................................ J2 Table J2. Sample Simulation Model Input ............................................................................................... J3 Table J3. Selected Model Outputs for the Evacuation of the Entire EPZ (Region R03) ........................... J4 Table J4. Average Speed (mph) and Travel Time (min) for Major Evacuation Routes (Region R03, Scenario 1) ............................................................................................................................ J5 Table J5. Simulation Model Outputs at Network Exit Links for Region R03, Scenario 1 ......................... J6 Table K1. Evacuation Roadway Network Characteristics ...................................................................... K39 Table K2. Nodes in the LinkNode Analysis Network which are Controlled ......................................... K132 Table M1. Evacuation Time Estimates for Trip Generation Sensitivity Study ....................................... M1 Table M2. Evacuation Time Estimates for Shadow Sensitivity Study .................................................... M2 Table M3. ETE Variation with Population Change ................................................................................. M4 Table N1. ETE Review Criteria Checklist ................................................................................................. N1 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ix KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

This report describes the analyses undertaken and the results obtained by a study to develop Evacuation Time Estimates (ETE) for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) located in San Diego County, California. ETE are part of the required planning basis and provide Southern California Edison (SCE) and State and local governments with sitespecific information needed for Protective Action decisionmaking.

In the performance of this effort, guidance is provided by documents published by Federal Governmental agencies. Most important of these are:

Criteria for Development of Evacuation Time Estimate Studies, NUREG/CR7002, November 2011.

Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG0654/FEMAREP1, Rev. 1, November 1980.

Development of Evacuation Time Estimates for Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG/CR6863, January 2005.

10CFR50, Appendix E - Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities Overview of Project Activities This project began in January, 2012 and extended over a period of 11 months. The major activities performed are briefly described in chronological sequence:

Attended kickoff meeting with SCE personnel and emergency management personnel representing state, county, and municipal governments.

Accessed U.S. Census Bureau data files for the year 2010. Studied Geographical Information Systems (GIS) maps of the area in the vicinity of the plant, then conducted a detailed field survey of the highway network.

Synthesized this information to create an analysis network representing the highway system topology and capacities within the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ), plus a Shadow Region covering the region between the EPZ boundary and approximately 15 miles radially from the plant.

Designed and sponsored a telephone survey of residents within the EPZ to gather focused data needed for this ETE study that were not contained within the census database. The survey instrument was reviewed and modified by the licensee and offsite response organization (ORO) personnel prior to the survey.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Data collection forms (provided to the OROs at the kickoff meeting) were returned with data pertaining to employment, transients, and special facilities in Orange County and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (MCB). Telephone calls to specific facilities supplemented the data provided.

The traffic demand and tripgeneration rates of evacuating vehicles were estimated from the gathered data. The trip generation rates reflected the estimated mobilization time (i.e., the time required by evacuees to prepare for the evacuation trip) computed using the results of the telephone survey of EPZ residents.

Following federal guidelines, the EPZ is subdivided into 5 PAZ. These PAZ are then grouped within circular areas or keyhole configurations (circles plus radial sectors) that define a total of 21 Evacuation Regions.

The timevarying external circumstances are represented as Evacuation Scenarios, each described in terms of the following factors: (1) Season (Summer, Winter); (2) Day of Week (Midweek, Weekend); (3) Time of Day (Midday, Evening); and (4) Weather (Good, Rain). One special event scenario involving Fourth of July weekend was considered. One roadway impact scenario was considered wherein a single lane was closed on Interstate 5 northbound for the duration of the evacuation. One earthquake scenario was considered wherein all bridges not retrofitted to withstand an earthquake were considered inaccessible during the course of the evacuation.

Staged evacuation was considered for those regions wherein the 2 mile radius and sectors downwind to 5 miles were evacuated. Two additional staged evacuations were considered wherein (1) the 2 mile radius and sectors downwind to the EPZ boundary were evacuated and (2) the 5 mile radius and sectors downwind to the EPZ boundary were evacuated.

As per NUREG/CR7002, the Planning Basis for the calculation of ETE is:

A rapidly escalating accident at the plant that quickly assumes the status of General Emergency such that the Advisory to Evacuate is virtually coincident with the siren alert, and no early protective actions have been implemented.

While an unlikely accident scenario, this planning basis will yield ETE, measured as the elapsed time from the Advisory to Evacuate until the stated percentage of the population exits the impacted Region, that represent upper bound estimates. This conservative Planning Basis is applicable for all initiating events.

If the emergency occurs while schools are in session, the ETE study assumes that the children will be evacuated by bus directly to reception centers or host schools located outside the EPZ. Parents, relatives, and neighbors are advised to not pick up their children at school prior to the arrival of the buses dispatched for that purpose. The ETE for schoolchildren are calculated separately.

Evacuees who do not have access to a private vehicle will either rideshare with relatives, friends or neighbors, or be evacuated by buses provided as specified in the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

county evacuation plans. Those in special facilities will likewise be evacuated with public transit, as needed: bus, van, or ambulance, as required. Separate ETE are calculated for the transitdependent evacuees, for registered people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs, and for those evacuated from special facilities.

Computation of ETE A total of 273 ETE were computed for the evacuation of the general public. Each ETE quantifies the aggregate evacuation time estimated for the population within one of the 21 Evacuation Regions to evacuate from that Region, under the circumstances defined for one of the 13 Evacuation Scenarios (21 x 13 = 273). Separate ETE are calculated for transitdependent evacuees, including schoolchildren for applicable scenarios.

Except for Region R03, which is the evacuation of the entire EPZ, only a portion of the people within the EPZ would be advised to evacuate. That is, the Advisory to Evacuate applies only to those people occupying the specified impacted region. It is assumed that 100 percent of the people within the impacted region will evacuate in response to this Advisory. The people occupying the remainder of the EPZ outside the impacted region may be advised to take shelter.

The computation of ETE assumes that 20% of the population within the EPZ but outside the impacted region, will elect to voluntarily evacuate. In addition, 20% of the population in the Shadow Region will also elect to evacuate. These voluntary evacuees could impede those who are evacuating from within the impacted region. The impedance that could be caused by voluntary evacuees is considered in the computation of ETE for the impacted region.

Staged evacuation is considered wherein those people within the 2mile region evacuate immediately, while those beyond 2 miles, but within the EPZ, shelterinplace. Once 90% of the 2mile region is evacuated, those people beyond 2 miles begin to evacuate. As per federal guidance, 20% of people beyond 2 miles will evacuate (noncompliance) even though they are advised to shelterinplace.

The computational procedure is outlined as follows:

A linknode representation of the highway network is coded. Each link represents a unidirectional length of highway; each node usually represents an intersection or merge point. The capacity of each link is estimated based on the field survey observations and on established traffic engineering procedures.

The evacuation trips are generated at locations called zonal centroids located within the EPZ and Shadow Region. The trip generation rates vary over time reflecting the mobilization process, and from one location (centroid) to another depending on population density and on whether a centroid is within, or outside, the impacted area.

The evacuation model computes the routing patterns for evacuating vehicles that are compliant with federal guidelines (outbound relative to the location of the plant), then San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

simulate the traffic flow movements over space and time. This simulation process estimates the rate that traffic flow exits the impacted region.

The ETE statistics provide the elapsed times for 90 percent and 100 percent, respectively, of the population within the impacted region, to evacuate from within the impacted region. These statistics are presented in tabular and graphical formats. The 90th percentile ETE have been identified as the values that should be considered when making protective action decisions because the 100th percentile ETE are prolonged by those relatively few people who take longer to mobilize. This is referred to as the evacuation tail in Section 4.0 of NUREG/CR7002.

Traffic Management This study modeled the existing comprehensive traffic management plans provided by Dana Point, San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano, MCB, and California Highway Patrol. Suggested modifications to these plans were discussed with the various agencies. See Section 9 and Appendix G for more information.

Selected Results A compilation of selected information is presented on the following pages in the form of Figures and Tables extracted from the body of the report; these are described below.

Figure 61 displays a map of the SONGS EPZ showing the layout of the 5 PAZ that comprise, in aggregate, the EPZ.

Table 31 presents the estimates of permanent resident population in each PAZ based on the 2010 Census data and information received from MCB.

Table 61 defines each of the 21 Evacuation Regions in terms of their respective groups of PAZ.

Table 62 lists the Evacuation Scenarios.

Table 71 and Table 72 are compilations of ETE. These data are the times needed to clear the indicated regions of 90 and 100 percent of the population occupying these regions, respectively. These computed ETE include consideration of mobilization time and of estimated voluntary evacuations from other regions within the EPZ and from the Shadow Region.

Table 73 and Table 74 present ETE for the 2mile region for unstaged and staged evacuations for the 90th and 100th percentiles, respectively.

Table 75 and Table 76 present ETE for the 5mile region for unstaged and staged evacuations for the 90th and 100th percentiles, respectively.

Table 87 presents ETE for the schoolchildren in good weather.

Table 810 presents ETE for the transitdependent population in good weather.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H10 presents an example of an Evacuation Region (Region R10) to be evacuated under the circumstances defined in Table 61. Maps of all regions are provided in Appendix H.

Conclusions General population ETE were computed for 273 unique cases - a combination of 21 unique Evacuation Regions and 13 unique Evacuation Scenarios. Table 71 and Table 72 document these ETE for the 90th and 100th percentiles. These ETE range from 1:30 (hr:min) to 6:15 at the 90th percentile (slightly higher for the Special Event, and significantly higher for the earthquake scenario).

Inspection of Table 71 and Table 72 indicates that the ETE for the 100th percentile are significantly longer than those for the 90th percentile. This is the result of the congestion within the EPZ. When the system becomes congested, traffic exits the EPZ at rates somewhat below capacity until some evacuation routes have cleared. As more routes clear, the aggregate rate of egress slows since many vehicles have already left the EPZ.

Towards the end of the process, relatively few evacuation routes service the remaining demand. See Figure 710 through Figure 722.

Inspection of Table 71 through Table 74 indicates that staged evacuation would not be beneficial for evacuating the population within the 2mile region of SONGS due to the lack of impedance to traffic evacuating from PAZ 1. See Section 7.5 for additional discussion.

Inspection of Table 75 and Table 76 indicates that a staged evacuation for Region R21 provides no benefit to evacuees from within the 5mile region and unnecessarily delays the evacuation of those beyond the 5 mile region (comparing region R21 with Region R03 in Table 71 and Table 72). See Section 7.6 for additional discussion.

Comparison of Scenarios 3 (summer, weekend, midday, good weather) and 11 (summer, weekend, midday, special event) in Table 71 indicates that the special event has a significant impact on the 90th percentile ETE with increases of up to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />. See Section 7.5 for additional discussion.

Comparison of Scenarios 1 and 12 in Table 71 indicates that the roadway closure - one lane northbound on I5 from SONGS (approximately 2 miles south of Basilone Rd - Exit

71) to the end of the analysis network at the interchange with Oso Parkway (Exit 88) -

has a significant impact on 90th percentile ETE for keyhole regions which involve the direct evacuation of PAZ 4 and 5, with up to 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> and 20 minute increases in ETE at the 90th percentile. See Section 7.5 for additional discussion.

Comparison of Scenarios 1 and 13 in Table 71 indicates that the earthquake scenario has a significant impact on the 90th and 100th percentile ETE with increases of up to 9:15 and 13:00 respectively. See Section 7.5 for additional discussion.

San Clemente is the most congested area during an evacuation. The last remnants of traffic congestion to clear in the EPZ were onramps to I5 northbound in the city of San San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Clemente. All congestion within the EPZ clears by 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and 20 minutes after the Advisory to Evacuate (ATE). See Section 7.3 and Figures 73 through 79.

Separate ETE were computed for schools, medical facilities, transitdependent persons, and registered people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs. The average singlewave ETE for these facilities are comparable to or less than the general population ETE at the 90th percentile for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03).

See Section 8.

Table 85 indicates that there are sufficient transportation resources to evacuate the transitdependent population in a single wave. See Sections 8.4 and 8.5.

The general population ETE at the 90th percentile is insensitive to reductions in the base trip generation time of 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> due to the traffic congestion within the EPZ. See Table M1.

The general population ETE is insensitive to the voluntary evacuation of vehicles in the Shadow Region. See Table M2.

Population increases of 8% or greater relative to the 2010 Census data will result in ETE changes which meet the NRC criteria for updating ETE between decennial Censuses. See Section M.3.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 61. SONGS EPZ PAZs San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 31. EPZ Permanent Resident Population 2000 2010 PAZ Population Population 1 215 4,533 2 0 0 3 11,513 11,997 4 50,089 68,879 5 68,947 67,948 TOTAL 130,764 153,357 EPZ Population 17.28%

Growth:

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 61. Description of Evacuation Regions Description PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R01 2Mile Region 2Mile Region x R02 5Mile Region 5Mile Region x x x x R03 Full EPZ Full EPZ x x x x x Evacuate 2Mile Region and Downwind to 5 Miles Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R04 NW, NNW, N P,Q,R,A,B x x R05 NNE x x x R06 NE, ENE, E, ESE C,D,E,F,G x x R07 SE x x x R08 SSE, S, SSW, SW, WSW, W H,J,K,L,M,N x x R09 WNW x x x Evacuate 5Mile Region and Downwind to EPZ Boundary Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 N/A WNW, NW, NNW, N Refer to R03 NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, SE, SSE, S, N/A Refer to R02 SSW, SW, WSW, W Evacuate 2Mile Region and Downwind to EPZ Boundary Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R10 NW, NNW, N P,Q,R,A,B x x x N/A NNE Refer to R05 N/A NE, ENE, E, ESE C,D,E,F,G Refer to R06 N/A SE, SSE Refer to R07 N/A S, SSW, SW, WSW, W H,J,K,L,M,N Refer to R08 R11 WNW x x x x Staged Evacuation 2Mile Region Evacuates, then Evacuate Downwind to 5 Miles Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R12 NW, NNW, N P,Q,R,A,B x x R13 NNE x x x R14 NE, ENE, E, ESE C,D,E,F,G x x R15 SE x x x R16 SSE, S, SSW, SW, WSW, W H,J,K,L,M,N x x R17 WNW x x x R18 5Mile Region x x x x SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions PAZ Region Description 1 2 3 4 5 R19 Evacuate PAZ 5 Only x R20 Evacuate 1,Shelter then Evacuate 2, 3, 4, 5 x x x x x R21 Evacuate 1, 2, 3, 4, Shelter then Evacuate 5 x x x x x PAZ(s) ShelterinPlace until 90% ETE for PAZ(s) ShelterinPlace PAZ(s) Evacuate Unstaged Region, then Evacuate San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 62. Evacuation Scenario Definitions Day of Time of Scenario Season1 Week Day Weather Special 1 Summer Midweek Midday Good None 2 Summer Midweek Midday Rain None 3 Summer Weekend Midday Good None 4 Summer Weekend Midday Rain None Midweek, 5 Summer Evening Good None Weekend 6 Winter Midweek Midday Good None 7 Winter Midweek Midday Rain None 8 Winter Weekend Midday Good None 9 Winter Weekend Midday Rain None Midweek, 10 Winter Evening Good None Weekend 11 Summer Weekend Midday Good 4th of July Weekend Roadway Impact - Single 12 Summer Midweek Midday Good Lane Closure on I5 Northbound 13 Summer Midweek Midday Good Earthquake 1

Winter means that school is in session (also applies to spring and autumn). Summer means that school is not in session.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 71. Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 90 Percent of the Affected Population Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) Scenario:

Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Region Rain Rain Rain Rain Earthquake Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 2Mile Region, 5Mile Region, and EPZ R01 1:35 1:40 1:35 1:40 2:20 1:40 1:45 1:40 1:45 2:25 1:30 1:40 3:00 R01 R02 5:10 5:45 4:35 5:00 4:25 5:15 5:45 4:30 4:55 4:20 5:10 6:20 11:35 R02 R03 4:50 5:25 4:20 4:45 4:05 4:50 5:25 4:10 4:40 4:05 6:10 5:55 13:50 R03 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R04 5:10 5:45 4:25 4:50 4:15 5:15 5:40 4:20 4:45 4:10 5:05 6:25 11:55 R04 R05 5:10 5:45 4:35 5:00 4:25 5:15 5:45 4:30 4:55 4:20 5:10 6:20 11:35 R05 R06 3:05 3:20 3:00 3:15 3:25 3:10 3:25 3:05 3:15 3:30 3:00 3:05 4:05 R06 R07 3:05 3:20 3:00 3:15 3:25 3:10 3:25 3:05 3:15 3:30 3:00 3:05 4:05 R07 R08 1:35 1:40 1:35 1:40 2:20 1:40 1:45 1:40 1:45 2:25 1:30 1:40 3:00 R08 R09 5:10 5:45 4:25 4:50 4:15 5:15 5:40 4:20 4:45 4:10 5:05 6:25 11:55 R09 2Mile Region and Keyhole to EPZ Boundary R10 4:45 5:20 4:15 4:35 3:55 4:45 5:20 4:00 4:30 3:50 6:15 6:00 14:00 R10 R11 4:45 5:20 4:15 4:35 3:55 4:45 5:20 4:00 4:30 3:50 6:15 6:00 14:00 R11 Staged Evacuation 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R12 5:05 5:40 4:30 5:00 4:20 5:10 5:40 4:25 4:50 4:20 5:05 6:25 11:25 R12 R13 5:10 5:45 4:40 5:05 4:35 5:15 5:45 4:35 5:00 4:35 5:10 6:20 11:10 R13 R14 3:30 3:35 3:25 3:40 3:55 3:30 3:40 3:30 3:40 4:00 3:30 3:30 4:10 R14 R15 3:55 4:10 3:55 4:10 4:10 4:00 4:15 3:55 4:10 4:10 3:55 4:00 4:35 R15 R16 1:40 1:40 1:40 1:45 2:20 1:45 1:45 1:45 1:45 2:20 1:35 1:40 3:00 R16 R17 5:05 5:40 4:30 5:00 4:20 5:10 5:40 4:25 4:50 4:20 5:05 6:25 11:25 R17 R18 5:10 5:45 4:40 5:05 4:35 5:15 5:45 4:35 5:00 4:35 5:10 6:20 11:10 R18 SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions R19 2:10 2:10 2:00 2:05 2:20 2:10 2:10 2:05 2:10 2:20 1:50 2:20 3:05 R19 R20 4:50 5:30 4:25 4:55 4:20 4:50 5:25 4:20 4:45 4:15 6:20 6:00 14:05 R20 R21 5:55 6:15 5:50 6:00 4:20 5:55 6:15 5:50 6:00 4:20 6:20 6:40 13:50 R21 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 72. Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 100 Percent of the Affected Population Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) Scenario:

Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Region Rain Rain Rain Rain Earthquake Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 2Mile Region, 5Mile Region, and EPZ R01 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 R01 R02 6:50 7:35 6:10 6:35 6:00 6:55 7:25 6:05 6:35 6:00 6:55 8:30 15:20 R02 R03 7:00 7:45 6:15 6:50 6:00 7:05 7:40 6:05 6:40 6:00 9:25 8:35 19:55 R03 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R04 6:50 7:30 6:10 6:35 5:50 6:55 7:25 6:05 6:25 5:40 6:55 8:30 15:20 R04 R05 6:50 7:35 6:10 6:35 6:00 6:55 7:25 6:05 6:35 6:00 6:55 8:30 15:20 R05 R06 5:00 5:25 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:05 5:25 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:15 R06 R07 5:00 5:25 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:05 5:25 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:15 R07 R08 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 R08 R09 6:50 7:30 6:10 6:35 5:50 6:55 7:25 6:05 6:25 5:40 6:55 8:30 15:20 R09 2Mile Region and Keyhole to EPZ Boundary R10 7:00 7:50 6:15 6:50 5:55 7:05 7:40 6:05 6:35 5:45 9:25 8:35 19:55 R10 R11 7:00 7:50 6:15 6:50 5:55 7:05 7:40 6:05 6:35 5:45 9:25 8:35 19:55 R11 Staged Evacuation 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R12 6:55 7:30 6:20 6:45 5:35 6:55 7:30 6:05 6:30 5:30 7:00 8:25 14:55 R12 R13 7:00 7:30 6:20 6:45 6:15 6:55 7:30 6:15 6:35 6:05 7:00 8:25 14:55 R13 R14 5:05 5:40 5:10 5:20 5:10 5:05 5:25 5:15 5:20 5:10 5:15 5:20 5:15 R14 R15 5:05 5:40 5:10 5:20 5:10 5:05 5:25 5:15 5:20 5:10 5:15 5:20 5:15 R15 R16 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R16 R17 6:55 7:30 6:20 6:45 5:35 6:55 7:30 6:05 6:30 5:30 7:00 8:25 14:55 R17 R18 7:00 7:30 6:20 6:45 6:15 6:55 7:30 6:15 6:35 6:05 7:00 8:25 14:55 R18 SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions R19 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:05 5:05 R19 R20 7:00 7:45 6:20 6:55 6:15 7:05 7:45 6:15 6:40 6:15 9:45 8:45 19:55 R20 R21 7:05 7:45 7:10 7:30 6:00 7:15 7:40 7:15 7:25 6:00 9:25 8:45 20:05 R21 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 73. Time to Clear 90 Percent of the 2Mile Area within the Indicated Region Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) Scenario:

Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Region Rain Rain Rain Rain Earthquake Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 2Mile Region, 5Mile Region, and EPZ R01 1:35 1:40 1:35 1:40 2:20 1:40 1:45 1:40 1:45 2:25 1:30 1:40 3:00 R01 R02 2:05 2:15 1:30 1:35 2:05 2:10 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:05 1:30 2:25 2:55 R02 R03 2:05 2:15 1:30 1:35 2:05 2:10 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:05 1:30 2:25 2:55 R03 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R04 2:05 2:15 1:30 1:35 2:05 2:10 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:05 1:30 2:25 2:55 R04 R05 2:05 2:15 1:30 1:35 2:05 2:10 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:05 1:30 2:25 2:55 R05 R06 1:35 1:40 1:35 1:35 2:20 1:40 1:45 1:35 1:40 2:25 1:30 1:45 3:00 R06 R07 1:35 1:40 1:35 1:35 2:20 1:40 1:45 1:35 1:40 2:25 1:30 1:45 3:00 R07 R08 1:35 1:40 1:35 1:40 2:20 1:40 1:45 1:40 1:45 2:25 1:30 1:40 3:00 R08 R09 2:05 2:15 1:30 1:35 2:05 2:10 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:05 1:30 2:25 2:55 R09 Staged Evacuation 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R12 2:05 2:15 1:50 1:50 2:20 2:10 2:20 1:55 1:55 2:20 1:50 2:20 2:55 R12 R13 2:05 2:15 1:50 1:50 2:20 2:10 2:20 1:55 1:55 2:20 1:50 2:20 2:55 R13 R14 1:40 1:40 1:40 1:45 2:15 1:45 1:45 1:40 1:45 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:55 R14 R15 1:40 1:40 1:40 1:45 2:15 1:45 1:45 1:40 1:45 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:55 R15 R16 1:40 1:40 1:40 1:45 2:20 1:45 1:45 1:45 1:45 2:20 1:35 1:40 3:00 R16 R17 2:05 2:15 1:50 1:50 2:20 2:10 2:20 1:55 1:55 2:20 1:50 2:20 2:55 R17 R18 2:05 2:15 1:50 1:50 2:20 2:10 2:20 1:55 1:55 2:20 1:50 2:20 2:55 R18 SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions R20 2:05 2:15 1:50 1:50 2:15 2:10 2:20 1:50 1:55 2:20 1:50 2:20 2:55 R20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 74. Time to Clear 100 Percent of the 2Mile Area within the Indicated Region Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) Scenario:

Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Region Rain Rain Rain Rain Earthquake Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 2Mile Region, 5Mile Region, and EPZ R01 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 R01 R02 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R02 R03 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R03 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R04 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R04 R05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R05 R06 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R06 R07 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R07 R08 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 R08 R09 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R09 Staged Evacuation 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R12 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R12 R13 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R13 R14 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R14 R15 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R15 R16 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R16 R17 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R17 R18 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R18 SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions R20 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 75. Time to Clear 90 Percent of the 5Mile Area within the Indicated Region Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)

Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Rain Rain Rain Rain Earthquake Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 5Mile Region, and EPZ R02 5:10 5:45 4:35 5:00 4:25 5:15 5:45 4:30 4:55 4:20 5:10 6:20 11:35 R03 5:20 5:55 4:35 5:05 4:30 5:20 5:55 4:30 5:00 4:25 5:30 6:30 15:10 SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions R21 5:15 5:50 4:35 5:05 4:30 5:20 5:50 4:35 5:00 4:25 5:15 6:30 15:30 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 76. Time to Clear 100 Percent of the 5Mile Area within the Indicated Region Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)

Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Rain Rain Rain Rain Earthquake Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 5Mile Region, and EPZ R02 6:50 7:35 6:10 6:35 6:00 6:55 7:25 6:05 6:35 6:00 6:55 8:30 15:20 R03 7:00 7:40 6:10 6:45 6:00 7:05 7:35 6:00 6:30 6:00 7:15 8:40 19:45 SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions R21 6:55 7:40 6:10 6:40 6:00 7:00 7:35 6:00 6:30 6:00 7:05 8:45 19:55 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 87. School Evacuation Time Estimates - Good Weather Travel Time Travel from Dist. To Time to Dist. EPZ EPZ Driver Loading EPZ Average EPZ Bdry to Bdry to ETE to Mobilization Time Bdry Speed Bdry ETE R.C. R.C. R.C.

School Time (min) (min) (mi) (mph) (min) (hr:min) (mi.) (min) (hr:min)

Orange County Private Schools Our Lady of Fatima School 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 Our Savior's Lutheran School 90 15 12.4 13.0 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 St. Michael's Christian Academy 90 15 10.3 9.4 66 2:55 17.4 24 3:15 Broderick Montessori School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Capistrano Home School 90 15 5.3 15.6 21 2:10 17.4 24 2:30 Capistrano Valley Christian Schools 90 15 5.3 15.6 21 2:10 17.4 24 2:30 Capo Beach Calvary 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Jserra Catholic High School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Mission Parish School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Monarch Bay Montessori Academy 90 15 0.9 29.4 2 1:50 20.1 27 2:15 Rancho Capistrano School 90 15 0.1 5.5 2 1:50 19.8 27 2:15 Saddleback Valley Christian School 90 15 12.4 26.9 28 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 San Juan Montessori 90 15 5.3 15.6 21 2:10 17.4 24 2:30 South Shores Christian School 90 15 0.5 4.5 7 1:55 21 28 2:20 St Edward School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 St. Margaret's Episcopal School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Stonebridge Day School 90 15 3.4 18.6 11 2:00 17.4 24 2:20 Stoneybrooke Christian Schools 90 15 0.1 26.9 1 1:50 19.8 27 2:15 Orange County Public Schools Bernice Ayer Middle School 90 15 9.3 7.4 76 3:05 17.4 24 3:25 Clarence Lobo Elementary School 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 Concordia Elementary School 90 15 12.4 13.0 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Las Palmas Elementary School 90 15 12.4 13.0 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Marblehead Elementary School 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 San Clemente High School 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Time Travel from Dist. To Time to Dist. EPZ EPZ Driver Loading EPZ Average EPZ Bdry to Bdry to ETE to Mobilization Time Bdry Speed Bdry ETE R.C. R.C. R.C.

School Time (min) (min) (mi) (mph) (min) (hr:min) (mi.) (min) (hr:min)

Shorecliffs Middle School 90 15 9.3 7.4 76 3:05 17.4 24 3:25 Truman Benedict Elementary School 90 15 9.3 7.4 76 3:05 17.4 24 3:25 Vista Del Mar Elementary School 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 Vista Del Mar Middle School 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 Ambuehl Elementary School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Dana Hills High School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Del Obispo Elementary School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Kinoshita Elementary School 90 15 5.3 15.6 21 2:10 17.4 24 2:30 Marco Forster Middle School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Palisades Elementary School 90 15 9.3 7.4 76 3:05 17.4 24 3:25 Richard Henry Dana Elementary School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Richard Henry Dana Exceptional Needs School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 San Juan Elementary School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 San Juan Hills High School 90 15 5.7 29.5 12 2:00 19.1 26 2:25 Serra High School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Orange County Preschools/Daycares Bright Horizons at San Clemente 90 15 9.3 8.2 68 2:55 17.4 24 3:20 Clarence Lobo 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 Concordia Elementary School 90 15 12.4 13.0 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Kindercare Learning Center 90 15 11.7 5.0 140 4:05 17.4 24 4:30 La Cristianita Preschool 90 15 8.5 9.0 57 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Las Palmas State Preschool 90 15 12.4 12.8 59 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Marblehead Elementary School 90 15 9.9 12.0 50 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 Our Savior's Lutheran Preschool 90 15 12.4 12.6 59 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Palisades United Methodist Preschool 90 15 8.5 8.4 61 2:50 17.4 24 3:10 San Clemente Presbyterian Preschool 90 15 10.3 9.1 68 2:55 17.4 24 3:20 San Clemente Preschool 90 15 10.3 9.1 68 2:55 17.4 24 3:20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Time Travel from Dist. To Time to Dist. EPZ EPZ Driver Loading EPZ Average EPZ Bdry to Bdry to ETE to Mobilization Time Bdry Speed Bdry ETE R.C. R.C. R.C.

School Time (min) (min) (mi) (mph) (min) (hr:min) (mi.) (min) (hr:min)

Serra Preschool 90 15 10.3 8.6 72 3:00 17.4 24 3:25 St. Michaels Infant/Toddler Center 90 15 10.3 8.3 75 3:00 17.4 24 3:25 Talega Life Church Preschool 90 15 11.7 4.3 164 4:30 17.4 24 4:55 Broderick Montessori School, Inc 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Capistrano Beach Cities YMCADel Obispo 90 15 3.7 26.2 9 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Capo Beach Calvary 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Capo Valley Head Start 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Childbridge Preschool 90 15 3.7 26.2 9 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Dana Montessori School 90 15 6.9 7.2 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Dana Point Montessori 90 15 6.9 7.2 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Evelyn Lobo Villegas Head Start 90 15 5.3 13.6 24 2:10 17.4 24 2:35 Gloria Dei Lutheran Preschool 90 15 6.9 7.2 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Kinoshita Elementary School 90 15 5.3 13.6 24 2:10 17.4 24 2:35 Little Minds Montessori Academy 90 15 6 9.6 38 2:25 17.4 24 2:50 Mission Parish School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Monarch Bay Montessori Academy 90 15 0.9 29.4 2 1:50 20.1 27 2:15 Ohana Preschool 90 15 6 9.6 38 2:25 17.4 24 2:50 Palisades Elementary School 90 15 9.3 7.1 79 3:05 17.4 24 3:30 Richard Henry Dana Elementary School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 San Juan Montessori 90 15 5.3 13.6 24 2:10 17.4 24 2:35 South Shores Christian Preschool 90 15 0.9 29.4 2 1:50 20.1 27 2:15 St Edward's Catholic Preschool 90 15 6.9 7.2 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 St. Margaret's Episcopal School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Stoneybrooke Christian Schools 90 15 0 5.5 0 1:45 19.8 27 2:15 MCB Schools San Onofre School 90 15 20.9 11.2 112 3:40 5.0 7 3:45 San Onofre Youth Center 90 15 20.9 11.2 112 3:40 5.0 7 3:45 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES19 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Time Travel from Dist. To Time to Dist. EPZ EPZ Driver Loading EPZ Average EPZ Bdry to Bdry to ETE to Mobilization Time Bdry Speed Bdry ETE R.C. R.C. R.C.

School Time (min) (min) (mi) (mph) (min) (hr:min) (mi.) (min) (hr:min)

MCB Preschools/Daycares San Onofre Child Development Center 90 15 20.9 11.2 112 3:40 5.0 7 3:45 Maximum for EPZ: 4:30 Maximum: 4:55 Average for EPZ: 2:30 Average: 2:55 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES20 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 810. TransitDependent Evacuation Time Estimates - Good Weather OneWave TwoWave Route Travel Route Route Travel Pickup Distance Time to Driver Travel Pickup Route Bus Mobilization Length Speed Time Time ETE to R. C. R. C. Unload Rest Time Time ETE Number Number (min) (miles) (mph) (min) (min) (hr:min) (miles) (min) (min) (min) (min) (min) (hr:min) 40 1,2 105 20.9 46.4 27 30 2:45 5.0 7 5 10 57 30 4:35 40 3,4 115 20.9 50.8 25 30 2:50 5.0 7 5 10 57 30 4:40 41 1,2,3,4 105 15.4 10.4 89 30 3:45 5.7 8 5 10 89 30 6:10 41 5,6,7,8 115 15.4 10.4 89 30 3:55 5.7 8 5 10 87 30 6:15 41 9,10,11,12 125 15.4 10.3 90 30 4:05 5.7 8 5 10 84 30 6:25 42 1,2,3,4 105 12.7 12.7 60 30 3:15 17.4 23 5 10 61 30 5:25 42 5,6,7,8 115 12.7 13.4 57 30 3:25 17.4 23 5 10 58 30 5:35 42 9,10,11,12 125 12.7 14.1 54 30 3:30 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 5:35 43 1,2,3,4 105 13.4 8.5 94 30 3:50 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 5:55 43 5,6,7,8 115 13.4 9.2 87 30 3:55 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 6:00 43 9,10,11,12 125 13.4 9.5 85 30 4:00 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 6:05 43 13,14,15,16 135 13.4 10.2 79 30 4:05 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 6:10 44 1,2,3 105 15.0 4.6 194 30 5:30 17.4 23 5 10 60 30 7:40 44 4,5,6, 115 15.0 4.8 188 30 5:35 17.4 23 5 10 60 30 7:45 44 7,8,9 125 15.0 5.0 181 30 5:40 17.4 23 5 10 60 30 7:50 45 1,2,3 105 13.4 4.8 168 30 5:05 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 7:10 45 4,5,6, 115 13.4 5.2 155 30 5:00 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 7:05 45 7,8,9 125 13.4 5.3 152 30 5:10 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 7:15 46 1,2,3,4 105 11.3 3.7 183 30 5:20 17.4 23 5 10 51 30 7:20 46 5,6,7,8 115 11.3 3.8 179 30 5:25 17.4 23 5 10 51 30 7:25 46 9,10,11,12 125 11.3 3.9 172 30 5:30 17.4 23 5 10 51 30 7:30 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES21 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

OneWave TwoWave Route Travel Route Route Travel Pickup Distance Time to Driver Travel Pickup Route Bus Mobilization Length Speed Time Time ETE to R. C. R. C. Unload Rest Time Time ETE Number Number (min) (miles) (mph) (min) (min) (hr:min) (miles) (min) (min) (min) (min) (min) (hr:min) 47 1,2,3,4 105 7.5 17.9 25 30 2:45 17.4 23 5 10 46 30 4:40 47 5,6,7 115 7.5 18.2 25 30 2:50 17.4 23 5 10 45 30 4:45 47 8,9,10 125 7.5 18.5 24 30 3:00 17.4 23 5 10 44 30 4:55 48 1,2,3,4 105 12.1 7.9 92 30 3:50 17.4 23 5 10 59 30 6:00 48 5,6,7,8 115 12.1 8.1 90 30 3:55 17.4 23 5 10 58 30 6:05 48 9,10,11 125 12.1 8.6 84 30 4:00 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 6:05 48 12,13 135 12.1 8.8 82 30 4:10 17.4 23 5 10 55 30 6:15 49 1,2,3,4 105 3.2 20.3 9 30 2:25 20.1 27 5 10 37 30 4:15 49 5,6,7 115 3.2 26.3 7 30 2:35 20.1 27 5 10 37 30 4:25 50 1,2,3,4 105 7.5 6.9 65 30 3:20 17.4 23 5 10 42 30 5:10 50 5,6,7 115 7.5 7.1 64 30 3:30 17.4 23 5 10 41 30 5:20 50 8,9,10 125 7.5 7.8 58 30 3:35 17.4 23 5 10 41 30 5:25 51 1,2,3,4 105 5.2 20.3 15 30 2:35 17.4 23 5 10 36 30 4:20 51 5,6,7 115 5.2 21.4 15 30 2:40 17.4 23 5 10 36 30 4:25 51 8,9,10 125 5.2 22.5 14 30 2:50 17.4 23 5 10 36 30 4:35 52 1,2,3,4 105 3.8 28.3 8 30 2:25 17.4 23 5 10 34 30 4:10 52 5,6,7 115 3.8 39.1 6 30 2:35 17.4 23 5 10 33 30 4:20 53 1,2,3,4 105 3.5 7.3 29 30 2:45 17.4 23 5 10 33 30 4:30 53 5,6,7 115 3.5 7.7 27 30 2:55 17.4 23 5 10 33 30 4:40 53 8,9,10 125 3.5 8.7 24 30 3:00 17.4 23 5 10 33 30 4:45 54 1,2,3,4 105 6.4 7.7 50 30 3:05 17.4 23 5 10 42 30 4:55 54 5,6,7 115 6.4 8.7 44 30 3:10 17.4 23 5 10 42 30 5:00 54 8,9,10 125 6.4 10.0 38 30 3:15 17.4 23 5 10 42 30 5:05 Maximum ETE: 5:40 Maximum ETE: 7:50 Average ETE: 3:45 Average ETE: 5:40 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES22 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H10. Region R10 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station ES23 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1 INTRODUCTION This report describes the analyses undertaken and the results obtained by a study to develop Evacuation Time Estimates (ETE) for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS),

located in San Diego County, California. ETE provide State and local governments with site specific information needed for Protective Action decisionmaking.

In the performance of this effort, guidance is provided by documents published by Federal Governmental agencies. Most important of these are:

• Criteria for Development of Evacuation Time Estimate Studies, NUREG/CR7002, November 2011.

• Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG 0654/FEMA REP 1, Rev. 1, November 1980.

• Analysis of Techniques for Estimating Evacuation Times for Emergency Planning Zones, NUREG/CR 1745, November 1980.

• Development of Evacuation Time Estimates for Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG/CR 6863, January 2005.

The work effort reported herein was supported and guided by local stakeholders who contributed suggestions, critiques, and the local knowledge base required. Table 11 presents a summary of stakeholders and interactions.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 11. Stakeholder Interaction Stakeholder Nature of Stakeholder Interaction Attended project kickoff meeting to discuss project Southern California Edison emergency planning methodology and define data needs. Provided site personnel and county emergency plans. Reviewed and approved telephone survey instrument prior to Orange County Emergency Management Bureau conducting survey. Reviewed and approved key project assumptions prior to running simulations.

Provided data needed for study. Attended project final meeting where draft results of the study were County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services discussed and comments on the draft report were provided.

California Emergency Management Agency Obtain state emergency plans Obtain existing traffic management plans, MCB emergency plans, and define data requirements.

Obtain existing traffic management plans, Municipal emergency planning personnel (San emergency plans, and meetings to define data Clemente, Dana Point, San Juan Capistrano) requirements and set up contacts with local government agencies Orange County Sheriffs Department/California Obtain existing traffic management plans Highway Patrol Obtain list of nonretrofitted bridges to quantify CalTRANS possible earthquake impacts Meetings to define data requirements and set up California State Parks contacts with local government agencies 1.1 Overview of the ETE Process The following outline presents a brief description of the work effort in chronological sequence:

1. Information Gathering:

a. Defined the scope of work in discussions with representatives from Southern California Edison (SCE).

b. Attended meetings with emergency planners from various state and local agencies to identify issues to be addressed and resources available.

c. Conducted a detailed field survey of the highway system and of area traffic conditions within the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) and Shadow Region.

d. Obtained demographic data from the 2010 census and MCB.

e. Conducted a random sample telephone survey of EPZ residents.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

f. Conducted a data collection effort to identify and describe schools, special facilities, major employers, transportation providers, and other important information.

2. Estimated distributions of Trip Generation times representing the time required by various population groups (permanent residents, employees, and transients) to prepare (mobilize) for the evacuation trip. These estimates are primarily based upon the random sample telephone survey.

3. Defined Evacuation Scenarios. These scenarios reflect the variation in demand, in trip generation distribution and in highway capacities, associated with different seasons, day of week, time of day and weather conditions.

4. Reviewed the existing traffic management plan to be implemented by local and state police in the event of an incident at the plant. Traffic control is applied at specified Traffic Control Points (TCP) located within the EPZ.

5. Used existing Protective Action Zones (PAZs) to define Evacuation Regions. The EPZ is partitioned into 5 PAZs along jurisdictional and geographic boundaries. Regions are groups of contiguous PAZs for which ETE are calculated. The configurations of these Regions reflect wind direction and the radial extent of the impacted area. Each Region, other than those that approximate circular areas, approximates a keyhole section within the EPZ as recommended by NUREG/CR7002.

6. Estimated demand for transit services for persons at Special Facilities and for transit dependent persons at home.

7. Prepared the input streams for the DYNEV II system.

a. Estimated the evacuation traffic demand, based on the available information derived from Census data, and from data provided by local and state agencies, SCE and from the telephone survey.

b. Applied the procedures specified in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM1) to the data acquired during the field survey, to estimate the capacity of all highway segments comprising the evacuation routes.

c. Developed the linknode representation of the evacuation network, which is used as the basis for the computer analysis that calculates the ETE.

d. Calculated the evacuating traffic demand for each Region and for each Scenario.

e. Specified selected candidate destinations for each origin (location of each source where evacuation trips are generated over the mobilization time) to support evacuation travel consistent with outbound movement relative to the location of SONGS.

1 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010), Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 2010.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

8. Executed the DYNEV II model to determine optimal evacuation routing and compute ETE for all residents, transients and employees (general population) with access to private vehicles. Generated a complete set of ETE for all specified Regions and Scenarios.

9. Documented ETE in formats in accordance with NUREG/CR7002.

10. Calculated the ETE for all transit activities including those for special facilities (schools, medical facilities, etc.), for the transitdependent population and for registered people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs.

1.2 The SONGS Plant Location SONGS is located along the coast of the Pacific Ocean in San Diego County, California near the border of Orange County. The site is approximately 60 miles southeast of Los Angeles, CA and 50 miles northwest of San Diego, CA. The EPZ consists of parts of Orange and San Diego Counties in California. Figure 11 displays the area surrounding SONGS. This map identifies the major population centers and major roads in the area, and shows the location of the plant relative to Los Angeles and San Diego.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 11. SONGS Location San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1.3 Preliminary Activities These activities are described below.

Field Surveys of the Highway Network KLD personnel drove the entire highway system within the EPZ and the Shadow Region which consists of the area between the EPZ boundary and approximately 15 miles radially from the plant. The characteristics of each section of highway were recorded. These characteristics are shown in Table 12:

Table 12. Highway Characteristics Number of lanes Posted speed Lane width Actual free speed Shoulder type & width Abutting land use Interchange geometries Control devices Lane channelization & queuing Intersection configuration (including capacity (including turn bays/lanes) roundabouts where applicable)

Geometrics: curves, grades (>4%) Traffic signal type Unusual characteristics: Narrow bridges, sharp curves, poor pavement, flood warning signs, inadequate delineations, toll booths, etc.

Video and audio recording equipment were used to capture a permanent record of the highway infrastructure. No attempt was made to meticulously measure such attributes as lane width and shoulder width; estimates of these measures based on visual observation and recorded images were considered appropriate for the purpose of estimating the capacity of highway sections. For example, Exhibit 157 in the HCM indicates that a reduction in lane width from 12 feet (the base value) to 10 feet can reduce free flow speed (FFS) by 1.1 mph - not a material difference - for twolane highways. Exhibit 1530 in the HCM shows little sensitivity for the estimates of Service Volumes at Level of Service (LOS) E (near capacity), with respect to FFS, for twolane highways.

The data from the audio and video recordings were used to create detailed geographical information systems (GIS) shapefiles and databases of the roadway characteristics and of the traffic control devices observed during the road survey; this information was referenced while preparing the input stream for the DYNEV II System.

As documented on page 155 of the HCM 2010, the capacity of a twolane highway is 1700 passenger cars per hour in one direction. For freeway sections, a value of 2250 vehicles per hour per lane is assigned, as per Exhibit 1117 of the HCM 2010. The road survey has identified several segments which are characterized by adverse geometrics on twolane highways which are reflected in reduced values for both capacity and speed. These estimates are consistent with the service volumes for LOS E presented in HCM Exhibit 1530. These links may be San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

identified by reviewing Appendix K. Link capacity is an input to DYNEV II which computes the ETE. Further discussion of roadway capacity is provided in Section 4 of this report.

Traffic signals are either pretimed (signal timings are fixed over time and do not change with the traffic volume on competing approaches), or are actuated (signal timings vary over time based on the changing traffic volumes on competing approaches). Actuated signals require detectors to provide the traffic data used by the signal controller to adjust the signal timings.

These detectors are typically magnetic loops in the roadway, or video cameras mounted on the signal masts and pointed toward the intersection approaches. If detectors were observed on the approaches to a signalized intersection during the road survey, detailed signal timings were not collected as the timings vary with traffic volume. TCPs at locations which have control devices are represented as actuated signals in the DYNEV II system.

If no detectors were observed, the signal control at the intersection was considered pretimed, and detailed signal timings were gathered for several signal cycles. These signal timings were input to the DYNEV II system used to compute ETE, as per NUREG/CR7002 guidance.

Figure 12 presents the linknode analysis network that was constructed to model the evacuation roadway network in the EPZ and Shadow Region. The directional arrows on the links and the node numbers have been removed from Figure 12 to clarify the figure. The detailed figures provided in Appendix K depict the analysis network with directional arrows shown and node numbers provided. The observations made during the field survey were used to calibrate the analysis network.

Telephone Survey A telephone survey was undertaken to gather information needed for the evacuation study.

Appendix F presents the survey instrument, the procedures used and tabulations of data compiled from the survey returns.

These data were utilized to develop estimates of vehicle occupancy to estimate the number of evacuating vehicles during an evacuation and to estimate elements of the mobilization process.

This database was also referenced to estimate the number of transitdependent residents.

Computing the Evacuation Time Estimates The overall study procedure is outlined in Appendix D. Demographic data were obtained from several sources, as detailed later in this report. These data were analyzed and converted into vehicle demand data. The vehicle demand was loaded onto appropriate source links of the analysis network using GIS mapping software. The DYNEV II system was then used to compute ETE for all Regions and Scenarios.

Analytical Tools The DYNEV II System that was employed for this study is comprised of several integrated computer models. One of these is the DYNEV (DYnamic Network EVacuation) macroscopic simulation model, a new version of the IDYNEV model that was developed by KLD under contract with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 12. SONGS LinkNode Analysis Network San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

DYNEV II consists of four submodels:

A macroscopic traffic simulation model (for details, see Appendix C).

A Trip Distribution (TD), model that assigns a set of candidate destination (D) nodes for each origin (O) located within the analysis network, where evacuation trips are generated over time. This establishes a set of OD tables.

A Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA), model which assigns trips to paths of travel (routes) which satisfy the OD tables, over time. The TD and DTA models are integrated to form the DTRAD (Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Distribution) model, as described in Appendix B.

A Myopic Traffic Diversion model which diverts traffic to avoid intense, local congestion, if possible.

Another software product developed by KLD, named UNITES (UNIfied Transportation Engineering System) was used to expedite data entry and to automate the production of output tables.

The dynamics of traffic flow over the network are graphically animated using the software product, EVAN (EVacuation ANimator), developed by KLD. EVAN is GIS based, and displays statistics such as LOS, vehicles discharged, average speed, and percent of vehicles evacuated, output by the DYNEV II System. The use of a GIS framework enables the user to zoom in on areas of congestion and query road name, town name and other geographical information.

The procedure for applying the DYNEV II System within the framework of developing ETE is outlined in Appendix D. Appendix A is a glossary of terms.

For the reader interested in an evaluation of the original model, IDYNEV, the following references are suggested:

NUREG/CR4873 - Benchmark Study of the IDYNEV Evacuation Time Estimate Computer Code NUREG/CR4874 - The Sensitivity of Evacuation Time Estimates to Changes in Input Parameters for the IDYNEV Computer Code The evacuation analysis procedures are based upon the need to:

Route traffic along paths of travel that will expedite their travel from their respective points of origin to points outside the EPZ.

Restrict movement toward the plant to the extent practicable, and disperse traffic demand so as to avoid focusing demand on a limited number of highways.

Move traffic in directions that are generally outbound, relative to the location of the SONGS.

DYNEV II provides a detailed description of traffic operations on the evacuation network. This description enables the analyst to identify bottlenecks and to develop countermeasures that San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 19 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

are designed to represent the behavioral responses of evacuees. The effects of these countermeasures may then be tested with the model.

1.4 Comparison with Prior ETE Study Table 13 presents a comparison of the present ETE study with the 2007 study. The major factors contributing to the differences between the ETE values obtained in this study and those of the previous study can be summarized as follows:

Population based upon 2010 Census data resulted in a 17% reduction in permanent resident population from the projected 2011 population used in the previous study. The 2011 projected population was based upon 2000 U.S. Census data.

Vehicle occupancy based on the results of a telephone survey of EPZ residents and resulted in fewer evacuating vehicles for permanent residents (1.3 persons/vehicle used in the previous study compared with 1.85 persons/vehicle used in the current study).

Tripgeneration rates are based on the results of a telephone survey of EPZ residents.

Different mobilization rates are used for different population groups compared with a single mobilization rate for all population groups used in the previous study. Current study assumed transients would mobilize more quickly than the permanent resident population, whereas the previous study assumed they would take the same amount of time to mobilize.

The previous study based transient estimates upon data from the 4th of July weekend, thus inflating average transient population within the EPZ. The current study used average values over the entire season and considered 4th of July weekend as an additional scenario.

Current study models intersections as they were observed to operate in the field, whereas the previous study modeled major signalized intersections set to flash mode, giving priority to the main direction.

Table 13. ETE Study Comparisons Topic Previous ETE Study Current ETE Study ArcGIS Software using 2010 US Resident Population 2000 census, grown to year 2011 Census blocks; area ratio method Basis 2011 Population = 184,947 used.

Population = 153,357 Average household size and vehicle ownership statistics obtained from the 2000 census were applied to each community to estimate the number of vehicles per 2.63 persons/household, 1.42 Resident Population households and persons in households evacuating vehicles/household Vehicle Occupancy without vehicles. yielding: 1.85 persons/vehicle.

Average vehicle occupancy = 1.3 persons/vehicle San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 110 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Topic Previous ETE Study Current ETE Study Employee estimates based on 2000 Census statistics and estimates based information provided about on CSUF projections major employers in EPZ, as well Employee as census statistics. 1.10 Population Employees = 12,703 transient workers employees per vehicle based on 1.2 employees/vehicle telephone survey results.

Employees = 21,274 Estimates based upon U.S.

Census data and the results of Census data used to provide an estimate of the telephone survey. A total of the number of people without access to 4,514 people who do not have personal transportation.

access to a vehicle (assuming 13,597 transit dependents 50% of those without access to a 70 persons/bus vehicle rideshare with a friend or TransitDependent 195 bus loads neighbor), requiring 151 buses to Population evacuate. An additional 259 registered people with An additional 529 registered people with disabilities and others with disabilities and others with access and access and functional needs functional needs (311 ambulatory, 164 require special transportation to requiring wheelchair vans and 54 requiring evacuate (129 ambulatory, 130 ambulances) require a wheelchairaccessible vehicle).

Transient estimates based upon information provided about Transient estimates based on attendance transient attractions in EPZ, U.S.

Transient records at parks and beaches during peak 4th Census data, and supplemented Population of July weekend. by observations of the facilities 42,062 recreation visitors during the road survey and from aerial photography.

Transients = 29,760 Special facility population based on Special facility population based information provided by institutional staffs. on information provided by each Medical Facility Special Facility Population = 1,199 county within the EPZ.

Population Ambulances required: 13 Current census = 913 Wheelchair Vans required: 59 Buses Required = 89 Buses required: 23 Ambulances Required = 55 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 111 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Topic Previous ETE Study Current ETE Study Public school enrollment: 19,944 School population based on Private school enrollment: 5,648 information provided by local municipalities within the EPZ.

Total school enrollment: 25,592 School Population School enrollment = 27,281 Assumed some students will not require transportation and further assumed 60 Buses required = 506 persons/bus would require 352 public transit Assumes all students will buses needed evacuate by bus.

Voluntary 20 percent of the population evacuation from within the EPZ, but not within within EPZ in areas Not considered the Evacuation Region (see outside region to be Figure 21) evacuated 0% Shadow evacuation assumed in the base 20% of people outside of the EPZ Shadow Evacuation analysis. Sensitivity study considers 20% within the Shadow Region shadow demand (see Figure 72)

Network Size N/A 2,173 links; 1,629 nodes Field surveys conducted in Field review, aerial photography, and traffic January 2012. Roads and engineering analyses intersections were video Roadway Geometric archived.

Data Capacities based on 2000 HCM.

Road capacities based on 2010 HCM.

Assumed traffic signals on the approaches to I5, as well as at significant intersections Traffic signals are modeled within the EPZ and the shadow ring, will at a based on field observations.

minimum be set to flash mode, with the TCPs incorporated into the Modeling of Traffic flashing yellow supporting a primary model as actuated signals.

Signals evacuation path.

Capacities up to 1900 Capacities between 1,0001,400 vehicles/ln/hr used vehicles/ln/hr used Direct evacuation to a destination outside of Direct evacuation to designated School Evacuation the EPZ. reception center.

50 percent of transitdependent Ridesharing Not considered persons will evacuate with a neighbor or friend.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 112 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Topic Previous ETE Study Current ETE Study Based on residential telephone survey of specific pretrip mobilization activities:

Residents with commuters Trip Generation curves adapted from returning leave between 30 and NUREG0654 Samples of Time to Complete 300 minutes.

Trip Generation for Evacuation Phases. Single mobilization curve for all population groups starts at 15 minutes Residents without commuters Evacuation and ends at 255 minutes. returning leave between 15 and 240 minutes.

Employees and transients leave between 15 and 120 minutes.

All times measured from the Advisory to Evacuate.

Normal and Adverse (rain or fog).

Normal and Rain. The capacity Freeway s: 16% speed reduction, 15%

and free flow speed of all links in Weather capacity reduction the network are reduced by 10%

Arterials: 10% reduction in speed, 6% in the event of rain reduction in capacity DYNEV II System - Version Modeling DYNASMART-P 4.0.11.0 4th of July weekend Special Events None considered 167,630 additional transients and 64,239 additional vehicles 21 Regions (central sector wind direction and each adjacent 5 Regions and 5 Scenarios producing 25 Evacuation Cases sector technique used) and 13 unique base cases.

Scenarios producing 273 unique cases.

ETE reported for 90th and 100th ETE reported the 100th percentile population Evacuation Time percentile population. Results for 5 regions excluding the full EPZ. Results Estimates Reporting presented by Region and presented by Region and Scenario.

Scenario.

Region 10 Evacuation Time Summer, Midweek, Midday, Estimates for the Weekday, Good Weather: 9:30 Good weather: 7:00 region consisting of PAZ 1,4, and 5, 100th Weekend, Good Weather, 9:12 percentile Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather: 6:15 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 113 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

2 STUDY ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS This section presents the estimates and assumptions utilized in the development of the evacuation time estimates.

2.1 Data Estimates

1. Population estimates are based upon Census 2010 data and data received from MCB.

2. Estimates of employees who reside outside the EPZ and commute to work within the EPZ are based upon data obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies

3. Population estimates at special facilities are based on available data from county emergency management offices and from phone calls to specific facilities.

4. Roadway capacity estimates are based on field surveys and the application of the Highway Capacity Manual 2010.

5. Population mobilization times are based on a statistical analysis of data acquired from a random sample telephone survey of EPZ residents (see Section 5 and Appendix F).

6. The relationship between resident population and evacuating vehicles is developed from the telephone survey. Average values of 2.63 persons per household and 1.42 evacuating vehicles per household are used. The relationship between persons and vehicles for transients and employees is as follows:

a. Employees: 1.10 employees per vehicle (telephone survey results) for all major employers.

b. Parks: Vehicle occupancy varies based upon data gathered from local transient facilities. See Appendix E.

c. Special Events: Transients in the area for the 4th of July weekend travel as families/households in a single vehicle, and used the average household size of 2.63 persons as the vehicle occupancy factor.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 21 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

2.2 Study Methodological Assumptions

1. ETE are presented for the evacuation of the 90th and 100th percentiles of population for each Region and for each Scenario. The percentile ETE is defined as the elapsed time from the Advisory to Evacuate issued to a specific Region of the EPZ, to the time that Region is clear of the indicated percentile of evacuees. A Region is defined as a group of PAZ that is issued an Advisory to Evacuate. A scenario is a combination of circumstances, including time of day, day of week, season, and weather conditions.

2. The ETE are computed and presented in tabular format and graphically, in a format compliant with NUREG/CR7002.

3. Evacuation movements (paths of travel) are generally outbound relative to the plant to the extent permitted by the highway network. All major evacuation routes are used in the analysis.

4. Regions are defined by the underlying keyhole or circular configurations as specified in Section 1.4 of NUREG/CR7002. These Regions, as defined, display irregular boundaries reflecting the geography of the PAZ included within these underlying configurations.

5. As indicated in Figure 22 of NUREG/CR7002, 100% of people within the impacted keyhole evacuate. 20% of those people within the EPZ, not within the impacted keyhole, will voluntarily evacuate. 20% of those people within the Shadow Region will voluntarily evacuate. See Figure 21 for a graphical representation of these evacuation percentages. Sensitivity studies explore the effect on ETE of increasing the percentage of voluntary evacuees in the Shadow Region (see Appendix M).

6. A total of 13 Scenarios representing different temporal variations (season, time of day, day of week) and weather conditions are considered. These Scenarios are outlined in Table 21.

7. Scenario 12 considers the closure of a single lane northbound on Interstate5 from SONGS (approximately 2 miles south of Basilone Rd (Exit 71) to the end of the analysis network at the interchange with Oso Parkway (Exit 88).

8. The models of the IDYNEV System were recognized as state of the art by the Atomic Safety & Licensing Board (ASLB) in past hearings. (Sources: Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Hearings on Seabrook and Shoreham; Urbanik1). The models have continuously been refined and extended since those hearings and were independently validated by a consultant retained by the NRC. The new DYNEV II model incorporates the latest technology in traffic simulation and in dynamic traffic assignment.

1 Urbanik, T., et. al. Benchmark Study of the IDYNEV Evacuation Time Estimate Computer Code, NUREG/CR4873, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, June, 1988.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 22 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 21. Evacuation Scenario Definitions Day of Time of Scenario Season2 Week Day Weather Special 1 Summer Midweek Midday Good None 2 Summer Midweek Midday Rain None 3 Summer Weekend Midday Good None 4 Summer Weekend Midday Rain None Midweek, 5 Summer Evening Good None Weekend 6 Winter Midweek Midday Good None 7 Winter Midweek Midday Rain None 8 Winter Weekend Midday Good None 9 Winter Weekend Midday Rain None Midweek, 10 Winter Evening Good None Weekend 11 Summer Weekend Midday Good 4th of July Weekend Roadway Impact - Single 12 Summer Midweek Midday Good Lane Closure on I5 Northbound 13 Summer Midweek Midday Good Earthquake 2

Winter means that school is in session (also applies to spring and autumn). Summer means that school is not in session.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 23 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 21. Voluntary Evacuation Methodology San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 24 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

2.3 Study Assumptions

1. The Planning Basis Assumption for the calculation of ETE is a rapidly escalating accident that requires evacuation, and includes the following:

a. Advisory to Evacuate is announced coincident with the siren notification.

b. Mobilization of the general population will commence within 15 minutes after siren notification.

c. ETE are measured relative to the Advisory to Evacuate.

2. It is assumed that everyone within the group of PAZ forming a Region that is issued an Advisory to Evacuate will, in fact, respond and evacuate in general accord with the planned routes.

3. 57 percent of the households in the EPZ have at least 1 commuter; 36 percent of those households with commuters will await the return of a commuter before beginning their evacuation trip, based on the telephone survey results. Therefore 21 percent (57% x 36% = 21%) of EPZ households will await the return of a commuter, prior to beginning their evacuation trip.

4. The ETE will also include consideration of through (ExternalExternal) trips during the time that such traffic is permitted to enter the evacuated Region. Normal traffic flow is assumed to be present within the EPZ at the start of the emergency.

5. Access Control Points (ACP) will be staffed within approximately 30 minutes following the siren notifications, to divert traffic attempting to enter the EPZ. It is assumed that no through traffic will enter the EPZ after this 30 minute time period.

6. Traffic Control Points (TCP) within the EPZ will be staffed over time, beginning at the Advisory to Evacuate. Their number and location will depend on the Region to be evacuated and resources available. The objectives of these TCP are:

a. Facilitate the movements of all (mostly evacuating) vehicles at the location.

b. Discourage inadvertent vehicle movements towards the plant.

c. Provide assurance and guidance to any traveler who is unsure of the appropriate actions or routing.

d. Act as local surveillance and communications center.

e. Provide information to the emergency operations center (EOC) as needed, based on direct observation or on information provided by travelers.

In calculating ETE, it is assumed that evacuees will drive safely, travel in directions identified in the plan, and obey all control devices and traffic guides.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 25 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

7. Buses will be used to transport those without access to private vehicles:

a. If schools are in session, transport (buses) will evacuate students directly to the designated reception centers.

b. Transport (buses) will evacuate children enrolled at preschools and daycares directly to the designated reception centers.

c. Buses, wheelchair vans and ambulances will evacuate patients at medical facilities and at any senior facilities within the EPZ, as needed.

d. Transitdependent general population will be evacuated to reception centers.

e. Schoolchildren, if school is in session, are given priority in assigning transit vehicles.

f. Bus mobilization time is considered in ETE calculations.

g. Analysis of the number of required roundtrips (waves) of evacuating transit vehicles is presented.

h. Transport of transitdependent evacuees from reception centers to congregate care centers is not considered in this study.

8. Provisions are made for evacuating the transitdependent portion of the general population to reception centers by bus, based on the assumption that some of these people will rideshare with family, neighbors, and friends, thus reducing the demand for buses. We assume that the percentage of people who rideshare is 50 percent. This assumption is based upon reported experience for other emergencies3, and on guidance in Section 2.2 of NUREG/CR7002.

9. One type of adverse weather scenario is considered. Rain may occur for either winter or summer scenarios. It is assumed that the rain begins earlier or at about the same time the evacuation advisory is issued. No weatherrelated reduction in the number of transients who may be present in the EPZ is assumed.

Adverse weather scenarios affect roadway capacity and the free flow highway speeds.

The factors applied for the ETE study are based on recent research on the effects of weather on roadway operations4; the factors are shown in Table 22.

3 Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, THE MISSISSAUGA EVACUATION FINAL REPORT, June 1981. The report indicates that 6,600 people of a transitdependent population of 8,600 people shared rides with other residents; a ride share rate of 76% (Page 510).

4 Agarwal, M. et. Al. Impacts of Weather on Urban Freeway Traffic Flow Characteristics and Facility Capacity, Proceedings of the 2005 MidContinent Transportation Research Symposium, August, 2005. The results of this paper are included as Exhibit 1015 in the HCM 2010.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 26 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

10. School buses used to transport students are assumed to transport 70 students per bus for elementary schools and 50 students per bus for middle and high schools, based on discussions with county offices of emergency management. Transit buses used to transport the transitdependent general population are assumed to transport 30 people per bus.

Table 22. Model Adjustment for Adverse Weather Highway Free Flow Scenario Capacity* Speed* Mobilization Time for General Population Rain 90% 90% No Effect

• Adverse weather capacity and speed values are given as a percentage of good weather conditions. Roads are assumed to be passable.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 27 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3 DEMAND ESTIMATION The estimates of demand, expressed in terms of people and vehicles, constitute a critical element in developing an evacuation plan. These estimates consist of three components:

1. An estimate of population within the EPZ, stratified into groups (resident, employee, transient).

2. An estimate, for each population group, of mean occupancy per evacuating vehicle. This estimate is used to determine the number of evacuating vehicles.

3. An estimate of potential doublecounting of vehicles.

Appendix E presents much of the source material for the population estimates. Our primary source of population data, the 2010 Census, however, is not adequate for directly estimating some transient groups.

Throughout the year, vacationers and tourists enter the EPZ. These nonresidents may dwell within the EPZ for a short period (e.g. a few days or one or two weeks), or may enter and leave within one day. Estimates of the size of these population components must be obtained, so that the associated number of evacuating vehicles can be ascertained.

The potential for doublecounting people and vehicles must be addressed. For example:

A resident who works and shops within the EPZ could be counted as a resident, again as an employee and once again as a shopper.

A visitor who stays at a hotel and spends time at a park, then goes shopping could be counted three times.

Furthermore, the number of vehicles at a location depends on time of day. For example, motel parking lots may be full at dawn and empty at noon. Similarly, parking lots at area parks, which are full at noon, may be almost empty at dawn. Estimating counts of vehicles by simply adding up the capacities of different types of parking facilities will tend to overestimate the number of transients and can lead to ETE that are too conservative.

Analysis of the population characteristics of the SONGS EPZ indicates the need to identify four distinct groups:

Permanent residents people who are year round residents of the EPZ.

Seasonal residents - people who are residents of the EPZ during the summer months.

Transients people who reside outside of the EPZ who enter the area for a specific purpose (shopping, recreation) and then leave the area.

Employees people who reside outside of the EPZ and commute to businesses within the EPZ on a daily basis.

Estimates of the population and number of evacuating vehicles for each of the population groups are presented for each PAZ and by polar coordinate representation (population rose).

The SONGS EPZ is subdivided into 5 PAZs. The EPZ is shown in Figure 31.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 31 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3.1 Permanent Residents The primary source for estimating permanent population is the latest U.S. Census data. The average household size (2.63 persons/household - See Figure F1) and the number of evacuating vehicles per household (1.42 vehicles/household - See Figure F8) were adapted from the telephone survey results.

Permanent population estimates are based upon Census 2010 data. The estimates are created by cutting the census block polygons by the PAZ and EPZ boundaries. A ratio of the original area of each census block and the updated area (after cutting) is multiplied by the total block population to estimate what the population is within the EPZ. This methodology assumes that the population is evenly distributed across a census block. Table 31 provides the permanent resident population within the EPZ, by PAZ based on this methodology. Permanent resident population estimates within MCB were provided by MCB.

The year 2010 permanent resident population is divided by the average household size and then multiplied by the average number of evacuating vehicles per household in order to estimate number of vehicles. Permanent resident population and vehicle estimates are presented in Table 32. Figure 32 and Figure 33 present the permanent resident population and permanent resident vehicle estimates by sector and distance from SONGS. This rose was constructed using GIS software.

It can be argued that this estimate of permanent residents overstates, somewhat, the number of evacuating vehicles, especially during the summer. It is certainly reasonable to assert that some portion of the population would be on vacation during the summer and would travel elsewhere. A rough estimate of this reduction can be obtained as follows:

Assume 50 percent of all households vacation for a twoweek period over the summer.

Assume these vacations, in aggregate, are uniformly dispersed over 10 weeks, i.e. 10 percent of the population is on vacation during each twoweek interval.

Assume half of these vacationers leave the area.

On this basis, the permanent resident population would be reduced by 5 percent in the summer and by a lesser amount in the offseason. Given the uncertainty in this estimate, we elected to apply no reductions in permanent resident population for the summer scenarios to account for residents who may be out of the area.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 32 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 31. SONGS EPZ San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 33 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 31. EPZ Permanent Resident Population 2000 2010 PAZ Population Population 1 215 4,533 2 0 0 3 11,513 11,997 4 50,089 68,879 5 68,947 67,948 TOTAL 130,764 153,357 EPZ Population 17.28%

Growth:

Table 32. Permanent Resident Population and Vehicles by PAZ 2010 2010 Resident PAZ Population Vehicles 1 4,533 2,447 2 0 0 3 11,997 6,477 4 68,879 37,192 5 67,948 36,682 TOTAL 153,357 82,798 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 34 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 32. Permanent Resident Population by Sector San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 35 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 33. Permanent Resident Vehicles by Sector San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 36 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3.2 Shadow Population A portion of the population living outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles radially from the SONGS (in the Shadow Region) may elect to evacuate without having been instructed to do so. Based upon NUREG/CR7002 guidance, it is assumed that 20 percent of the permanent resident population, based on U.S. Census Bureau data, in this Shadow Region will elect to evacuate.

Shadow population characteristics (household size, evacuating vehicles per household, mobilization time) are assumed to be the same as that for the EPZ permanent resident population. Table 33, Figure 34, and Figure 35 present estimates of the shadow population and vehicles, by sector.

Table 33. Shadow Population and Vehicles by Sector Evacuating Sector Population Vehicles N 5,201 2,804 NNE 129 70 NE 55 29 ENE 367 198 E 1,380 744 ESE 6,093 3,289 SE 17,395 9,392 SSE 0 0 S 0 0 SSW 0 0 SW 0 0 WSW 0 0 W 0 0 WNW 0 0 NW 43,037 23,237 NNW 37,388 20,185 TOTAL 111,045 59,948 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 37 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 34. Shadow Population by Sector San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 38 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 35. Shadow Vehicles by Sector San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 39 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3.3 Transient Population Transient population groups are defined as those people (who are not permanent residents, nor commuting employees) who enter the EPZ for a specific purpose (shopping, recreation, seasonal migration). Transients may stay for only one season, spend less than one day in the EPZ, or stay overnight at camping facilities, hotels and motels. The SONGs EPZ has a number of areas and facilities that attract transients, including:

Lodging Facilities Marinas Parks Beaches Campgrounds Golf Courses Seasonal Residences Surveys of lodging facilities within the EPZ were conducted to determine the number of rooms, percentage of occupied rooms at peak times, and the number of people and vehicles per room for each facility. These data were used to estimate the number of transients and evacuating vehicles at each of these facilities. A total of 5,041 transients in 3,150 vehicles are assigned to lodging facilities in the EPZ.

A survey was conducted to determine the number of slips, average daily attendance, and the percentage of local visitors for the Dana Point Harbor. These data were used to estimate the number of transients and evacuating vehicles at each of these facilities. A total of 396 transients and 153 vehicles are assigned to the harbor.

A survey of parks was conducted to determine the number of transients visiting the parks within in EPZ on a typical day. A total of 2,150 transients and 817 vehicles have been assigned to these parks.

Surveys of beaches within the EPZ were conducted to determine the number beachgoers and vehicles present at each beach during peak times. These data were used to estimate the number of evacuating vehicles for transients at each of these facilities. A total of 15,620 transients and 3,792 vehicles are assigned to beaches in the EPZ.

Surveys of campgrounds within the EPZ were conducted to determine the number of campsites, peak occupancy, the number of vehicles and people per campsite, as well as the percentage of campers that are local for each facility. These data were used to estimate the number of evacuating vehicles for transients at each of these facilities. A total of 4,302 transients and 1,230 vehicles are assigned to campgrounds in the EPZ.

There are six golf courses within the EPZ. Surveys of golf courses were conducted to determine the number of golfers and vehicles at each facility on a typical peak day, and the number of golfers that travels from outside the area. A total of 137 transients and 87 vehicles are assigned to golf courses within the EPZ.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 310 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Appendix E summarizes the transient data that was estimated for the EPZ. Table E4 presents the number of transients visiting recreational areas, while Table E5 presents the number of transients at lodging facilities within the EPZ.

Table 34 presents transient population and transient vehicle estimates by PAZ. Figure 36 and Figure 37 present these data by sector and distance from the plant.

3.4 Seasonal Transient Population The SONGS EPZ has a secondary category of transient population which is seasonal residents.

These people will enter the area during the summer months and may stay considerably longer (several weeks or the entire season) than the average transient using a hotel or motel. The seasonal population use other lodging facilities such as condos, beach houses and summer rentals that otherwise would not be captured in a typical lodging population.

The methodology behind calculating the seasonal population involves using 2010 Census Block data. Each Census Block includes information regarding the number of vacant and occupied households. Using this Census data, an average vacant household percentage (11%) was calculated for the entire SONGS EPZ.

It is assumed that seasonal residents will be renting homes throughout the EPZ. It is further assumed that 11% of the vacant homes within these Census blocks are uninhabited at all times and do not serve as rental homes. The percentage of vacant housing reported by the census in excess of 11% was assumed to be seasonally rented. An average household size of 2.63 persons per household is used to determine the seasonal transient population, and 1.42 evacuating vehicles per seasonal household is used to determine the number of seasonal transient vehicles. These numbers are adapted from the telephone survey results (see Appendix F).

It is estimated that there is an additional seasonal population of 2,114 transients and 1,097 transient vehicles within the SONGS EPZ. These numbers are included with the transient population in Table 34 as well as Figure 36 and Figure 37.

Table 34. Summary of Transients and Transient Vehicles Transients Transient Vehicles PAZ Seasonal Other Seasonal Other Residents Visitors Residents Visitors 1 0 6,457 0 1,836 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 1,043 4,864 541 1,878 5 1,071 16,325 556 5,515 Total 2,114 27,646 1,097 9,229 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 311 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 36. Transient Population by Sector San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 312 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 37. Transient Vehicles by Sector San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 313 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3.5 Employees Employees who work within the EPZ fall into two categories:

Those who live and work in the EPZ Those who live outside of the EPZ and commute to jobs within the EPZ.

Those of the first category are already counted as part of the permanent resident population. To avoid double counting, we focus only on those employees commuting from outside the EPZ who will evacuate along with the permanent resident population.

Employment data regarding the maximum shift employment was obtained from SONGS as well as MCB. The number of employees and employee vehicles derived from each of these facilities are provided in Table 35.

Data obtained from the US Census Longitudinal EmployerHousehold Dynamics from the OnTheMap Census analysis tool1 were used to estimate the number of employees commuting into the EPZ that are attributable to all other major employers. The 2010 Workplace Area Characteristic data was also obtained from this website and was used to determine the number of employees by Census Block within the SONGS EPZ.

Since not all employees are working at facilities within the EPZ at one time, a maximum shift reduction was applied. The Work Area Profile Report, also output by the OnTheMap Application, breaks down jobs within the EPZ by industry sector. Assuming maximum shift employment occurs Monday through Friday between 9 AM and 5 PM, the following jobs take place outside the typical 95 work day:

Manufacturing - 5.6% of jobs; takes place in shifts over 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation - 2.5% of jobs; takes place in evenings and on weekends Accommodations and Food Services - 14.4% of jobs; peaks in the evenings The maximum shift in the EPZ is about 77.5% (100% 5.6% 2.5% 14.4% = 77.5%). This value was applied to the total employment in 2010 to represent the maximum number of employees present in the EPZ at any one time. The Inflow/Outflow Report for the SONGS EPZ was then used to calculate the percent of employees that work within the EPZ but live outside. This value, 74.1%, was applied to the maximum shift employee values to compute the number of people commuting into the EPZ to work at peak times.

In Table 35, the Employees (Max Shift) are multiplied by the percent nonEPZ factor to determine the number of employees who are not residents of the EPZ. A vehicle occupancy of 1.10 employees per vehicle obtained from the telephone survey (See Figure F7) was used to determine the number of evacuating employee vehicles for all major employers.

Table 35 presents nonEPZ Resident employee and vehicle estimates by PAZ. Figure 38 and Figure 39 present these data by sector.

1 http://onthemap.ces.census.gov/

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 314 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 35. Summary of NonEPZ Resident Employees and Employee Vehicles Max Shift Employment used for Individual Employers Major 2010 Employment NonEPZ Employees Employee Vehicles Max Shift Employer (50+ Employees) (74.1%) (1.10 Emp/Veh)

SONGS 3,150 2,498 1,851 1,683 MCB N/A 443 331 302 All other Employers Derived from Census Statistics 2010 Employment NonEPZ Employees Employee Vehicles PAZ Max Shift (77.5%)

(50+ Employees) (74.1%) (1.10 Emp/Veh) 3 390 302 223 202 4 17,288 13,398 9,930 9,024 5 15,566 12,064 8,939 8,122 TOTAL: 28,705 21,274 19,333 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 315 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 38. Employee Population by Sector San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 316 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 39. Employee Vehicles by Sector San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 317 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3.6 Medical Facilities Data were provided by Orange County and the individual municipalities within the EPZ for each of the medical facilities within the EPZ. Table E3 in Appendix E summarizes the data gathered.

Section 8 details the evacuation of medical facilities and their patients. The number and type of evacuating vehicles that need to be provided depend on the patients' state of health. It is estimated that buses can transport up to 30 ambulatory and 3 wheelchair bound people and ambulances, up to 2 people.

3.7 Total Demand in Addition to Permanent Population Vehicles will be traveling through the EPZ (externalexternal trips) at the time of an accident.

After the Advisory to Evacuate is announced, these throughtravelers will also evacuate. These through vehicles are assumed to travel on the major routes traversing the EPZ - I5, and the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor. It is assumed that this traffic will continue to enter the EPZ during the first 30 minutes following the Advisory to Evacuate.

Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) data was obtained from Federal Highway Administration to estimate the number of vehicles per hour on the aforementioned routes. The AADT was multiplied by the KFactor, which is the proportion of the AADT on a roadway segment or link during the design hour, resulting in the design hour volume (DHV). The design hour is usually the 30th highest hourly traffic volume of the year, measured in vehicles per hour (vph). The DHV is then multiplied by the DFactor, which is the proportion of the DHV occurring in the peak direction of travel (also known as the directional split). The resulting values are the directional design hourly volumes (DDHV), and are presented in Table 36, for each of the routes considered. The DDHV is then multiplied by 0.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> (access control points - ACP - are assumed to be activated at 30 minutes after the advisory to evacuate) to estimate the total number of external vehicles loaded on the analysis network. As indicated, there are 5,536 vehicles entering the EPZ as externalexternal trips prior to the activation of the ACP and the diversion of this traffic. This number is reduced by 60% for evening scenarios (Scenarios 5 and 10 as discussed in Section 6.

3.8 Special Event One special event (Scenario 11) is considered for the ETE study - 4th of July Weekend. Data were obtained from local emergency management officials in the municipalities of San Clemente, Dana Point, and San Juan Capistrano regarding the number of transients and locations of major festivities within their respective cities. San Clemente has an influx of approximately 25,000 transients, Dana Point has an influx of 150,000 transients and San Juan Capistrano has an influx of 12,000 transients. To avoid double counting, transients already considered at other facilities within San Clemente and Dana Point were removed from the total special event transients. Those transients in San Juan Capistrano are specifically at the Sports Park on Camino Del Avion. It was assumed that families travel in personal vehicles as a household unit; therefore, the average household size of 2.63 was used as a vehicle occupancy San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 318 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

factor. A total of 167,630 transients and 64,239 transient vehicles were incorporated at various parking locations throughout the EPZ during the 4th of July weekend. The special event vehicle trips were generated utilizing the same mobilization distributions for transients. Public transportation is not provided for this event and was not considered in the special event analysis.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 319 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 36. SONGS EPZ External Traffic Upstream Downstream HPMS1 K D Hourly External Road Name Direction Node Node AADT Factor2 Factor2 Volume Traffic 8003 1735 I5 Northbound 135,000 0.082 0.5 5,535 2,768 8087 1734 I5 Southbound 135,000 0.082 0.25 2,768 1,384 8057 1057 San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Southbound 135,000 0.082 0.25 2,768 1,384 TOTAL: 5,536 1

Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington, D.C., 2012 2

HCM 2010 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 320 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

3.9 Summary of Demand A summary of population and vehicle demand is provided in Table 37 and Table 38, respectively. This summary includes all population groups described in this section. Additional population groups - transitdependent, special facility and school population - are described in greater detail in Section 8. A total of 259,308 people and 131,530 vehicles are considered in this study.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 321 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 37. Summary of Population Demand Transients Transit Special Shadow External PAZ Residents Seasonal Other Employees Schools Total Dependent Facilities Population Traffic Residents Visitors 1 4,533 0 6,457 133 1,851 0 1,062 0 0 14,036 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11,997 0 0 353 513 0 0 0 0 12,863 4 68,879 1,043 4,864 2,028 9,971 337 11,409 0 0 98,531 5 67,948 1,071 16,325 2,000 8,939 576 14,810 0 0 111,669 Shadow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,209 0 22,209 Total 153,357 2,114 27,646 4,514 21,274 913 27,281 22,209 0 259,308 NOTE: Shadow Population has been reduced to 20%. Refer to Figure 21 for additional information.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 322 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 38. Summary of Vehicle Demand Transients Transit Special Shadow External PAZ Residents Seasonal Other Employees Schools Total Dependent Facilities Population Traffic Residents Visitors 1 2,447 0 1,836 8 1,683 0 34 0 0 6,008 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6,477 0 0 24 466 0 0 0 0 6,967 4 37,192 541 1,878 142 9,062 96 420 0 0 49,331 5 36,682 556 5,515 128 8,122 137 558 0 0 51,698 Shadow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,990 5,536 17,526 Total 82,798 1,097 9,229 302 19,333 233 1,012 11,990 5,536 131,530 NOTE: Buses represented as two passenger vehicles. Refer to Section 8 for additional information.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 323 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

4 ESTIMATION OF HIGHWAY CAPACITY The ability of the road network to service vehicle demand is a major factor in determining how rapidly an evacuation can be completed. The capacity of a road is defined as the maximum hourly rate at which persons or vehicles can reasonably be expected to traverse a point or uniform section of a lane of roadway during a given time period under prevailing roadway, traffic and control conditions, as stated in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010).

In discussing capacity, different operating conditions have been assigned alphabetical designations, A through F, to reflect the range of traffic operational characteristics. These designations have been termed "Levels of Service" (LOS). For example, LOS A connotes freeflow and highspeed operating conditions; LOS F represents a forced flow condition. LOS E describes traffic operating at or near capacity.

Another concept, closely associated with capacity, is Service Volume (SV). Service volume is defined as The maximum hourly rate at which vehicles, bicycles or persons reasonably can be expected to traverse a point or uniform section of a roadway during an hour under specific assumed conditions while maintaining a designated level of service. This definition is similar to that for capacity. The major distinction is that values of SV vary from one LOS to another, while capacity is the service volume at the upper bound of LOS E, only.

This distinction is illustrated in Exhibit 1117 of the HCM 2010. As indicated there, the SV varies with Free Flow Speed (FFS), and LOS. The SV is calculated by the DYNEV II simulation model, based on the specified link attributes, FFS, capacity, control device and traffic demand.

Other factors also influence capacity. These include, but are not limited to:

Lane width Shoulder width Pavement condition Horizontal and vertical alignment (curvature and grade)

Percent truck traffic Control device (and timing, if it is a signal)

Weather conditions (rain, fog, wind speed)

These factors are considered during the road survey and in the capacity estimation process; some factors have greater influence on capacity than others. For example, lane and shoulder width have only a limited influence on Base Free Flow Speed (BFFS1) according to Exhibit 157 of the HCM. Consequently, lane and shoulder widths at the narrowest points were observed during the road survey and these observations were recorded, but no detailed measurements of lane or shoulder width were taken. Horizontal and vertical alignment can influence both FFS and capacity. The estimated FFS were measured using the survey vehicles speedometer and observing local traffic, under free flow conditions. Capacity is estimated from the procedures of 1

A very rough estimate of BFFS might be taken as the posted speed limit plus 10 mph (HCM 2010 Page 1515)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 41 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

the 2010 HCM. For example, HCM Exhibit 71(b) shows the sensitivity of Service Volume at the upper bound of LOS D to grade (capacity is the Service Volume at the upper bound of LOS E).

As discussed in Section 2.3, it is necessary to adjust capacity figures to represent the prevailing conditions during inclement weather. Based on limited empirical data, weather conditions such as rain reduce the values of free speed and of highway capacity by approximately 10 percent. Over the last decade new studies have been made on the effects of rain on traffic capacity. These studies indicate a range of effects between 5 and 20 percent depending on wind speed and precipitation rates. As indicated in Section 2.3, we employ a reduction in free speed and in highway capacity of 10 percent for rain.

Since congestion arising from evacuation may be significant, estimates of roadway capacity must be determined with great care. Because of its importance, a brief discussion of the major factors that influence highway capacity is presented in this section.

Rural highways generally consist of: (1) one or more uniform sections with limited access (driveways, parking areas) characterized by uninterrupted flow; and (2) approaches to at grade intersections where flow can be interrupted by a control device or by turning or crossing traffic at the intersection. Due to these differences, separate estimates of capacity must be made for each section. Often, the approach to the intersection is widened by the addition of one or more lanes (turn pockets or turn bays), to compensate for the lower capacity of the approach due to the factors there that can interrupt the flow of traffic. These additional lanes are recorded during the field survey and later entered as input to the DYNEV II system.

4.1 Capacity Estimations on Approaches to Intersections Atgrade intersections are apt to become the first bottleneck locations under local heavy traffic volume conditions. This characteristic reflects the need to allocate access time to the respective competing traffic streams by exerting some form of control. During evacuation, control at critical intersections will often be provided by traffic control personnel assigned for that purpose, whose directions may supersede traffic control devices. Additional TCPs are recommended; see Section 9 and Appendix G for additional details. The perlane capacity of an approach to a signalized intersection can be expressed (simplistically) in the following form:

3600 3600 where:

Qcap,m = Capacity of a single lane of traffic on an approach, which executes movement, m, upon entering the intersection; vehicles per hour (vph) hm = Mean queue discharge headway of vehicles on this lane that are executing San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 42 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

movement, m; seconds per vehicle G = Mean duration of GREEN time servicing vehicles that are executing movement, m, for each signal cycle; seconds L = Mean "lost time" for each signal phase servicing movement, m; seconds C = Duration of each signal cycle; seconds Pm = Proportion of GREEN time allocated for vehicles executing movement, m, from this lane. This value is specified as part of the control treatment.

m = The movement executed by vehicles after they enter the intersection: through, leftturn, rightturn, and diagonal.

The turnmovementspecific mean discharge headway hm, depends in a complex way upon many factors: roadway geometrics, turn percentages, the extent of conflicting traffic streams, the control treatment, and others. A primary factor is the value of "saturation queue discharge headway", hsat, which applies to through vehicles that are not impeded by other conflicting traffic streams. This value, itself, depends upon many factors including motorist behavior.

Formally, we can write, where:

hsat = Saturation discharge headway for through vehicles; seconds per vehicle F1,F2 = The various known factors influencing hm fm( ) = Complex function relating hm to the known (or estimated) values of hsat, F1, F2, The estimation of hm for specified values of hsat, F1, F2, ... is undertaken within the DYNEV II simulation model by a mathematical model2. The resulting values for hm always satisfy the condition:

That is, the turnmovementspecific discharge headways are always greater than, or equal to the saturation discharge headway for through vehicles. These headways (or its inverse 2

Lieberman, E., "Determining Lateral Deployment of Traffic on an Approach to an Intersection", McShane, W. &

Lieberman, E., "Service Rates of Mixed Traffic on the far Left Lane of an Approach". Both papers appear in Transportation Research Record 772, 1980. Lieberman, E., Xin, W., Macroscopic Traffic Modeling For LargeScale Evacuation Planning, presented at the TRB 2012 Annual Meeting, January 2226, 2012 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 43 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

equivalent, saturation flow rate), may be determined by observation or using the procedures of the HCM 2010.

The above discussion is necessarily brief given the scope of this ETE report and the complexity of the subject of intersection capacity. In fact, Chapters 18, 19 and 20 in the HCM 2010 address this topic. The factors, F1, F2,, influencing saturation flow rate are identified in equation (185) of the HCM 2010.

The traffic signals within the EPZ and Shadow Region are modeled using representative phasing plans and phase durations obtained as part of the field data collection. Traffic responsive signal installations allow the proportion of green time allocated (Pm) for each approach to each intersection to be determined by the expected traffic volumes on each approach during evacuation circumstances. The amount of green time (G) allocated is subject to maximum and minimum phase duration constraints; 2 seconds of yellow time are indicated for each signal phase and 1 second of allred time is assigned between signal phases, typically. If a signal is pre timed, the yellow and allred times observed during the road survey are used. A lost time (L) of 2.0 seconds is used for each signal phase in the analysis.

4.2 Capacity Estimation along Sections of Highway The capacity of highway sections as distinct from approaches to intersections is a function of roadway geometrics, traffic composition (e.g. percent heavy trucks and buses in the traffic stream) and, of course, motorist behavior. There is a fundamental relationship which relates service volume (i.e. the number of vehicles serviced within a uniform highway section in a given time period) to traffic density. The top curve in Figure 41 illustrates this relationship.

As indicated, there are two flow regimes: (1) Free Flow (left side of curve); and (2) Forced Flow (right side). In the Free Flow regime, the traffic demand is fully serviced; the service volume increases as demand volume and density increase, until the service volume attains its maximum value, which is the capacity of the highway section. As traffic demand and the resulting highway density increase beyond this "critical" value, the rate at which traffic can be serviced (i.e. the service volume) can actually decline below capacity (capacity drop). Therefore, in order to realistically represent traffic performance during congested conditions (i.e. when demand exceeds capacity), it is necessary to estimate the service volume, VF, under congested conditions.

The value of VF can be expressed as:

where:

R = Reduction factor which is less than unity San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 44 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

We have employed a value of R=0.90. The advisability of such a capacity reduction factor is based upon empirical studies that identified a falloff in the service flow rate when congestion occurs at bottlenecks or choke points on a freeway system. Zhang and Levinson3 describe a research program that collected data from a computerbased surveillance system (loop detectors) installed on the Interstate Highway System, at 27 active bottlenecks in the twin cities metro area in Minnesota over a 7week period. When flow breakdown occurs, queues are formed which discharge at lower flow rates than the maximum capacity prior to observed breakdown. These queue discharge flow (QDF) rates vary from one location to the next and also vary by day of week and time of day based upon local circumstances. The cited reference presents a mean QDF of 2,016 passenger cars per hour per lane (pcphpl). This figure compares with the nominal capacity estimate of 2,250 pcphpl estimated for the ETE and indicated in Appendix K for freeway links. The ratio of these two numbers is 0.896 which translates into a capacity reduction factor of 0.90.

Since the principal objective of evacuation time estimate analyses is to develop a realistic estimate of evacuation times, use of the representative value for this capacity reduction factor (R=0.90) is justified. This factor is applied only when flow breaks down, as determined by the simulation model.

Rural roads, like freeways, are classified as uninterrupted flow facilities. (This is in contrast with urban street systems which have closely spaced signalized intersections and are classified as interrupted flow facilities.) As such, traffic flow along rural roads is subject to the same effects as freeways in the event traffic demand exceeds the nominal capacity, resulting in queuing and lower QDF rates. As a practical matter, rural roads rarely break down at locations away from intersections. Any breakdowns on rural roads are generally experienced at intersections where other model logic applies, or at lane drops which reduce capacity there.

Therefore, the application of a factor of 0.90 is appropriate on rural roads, but rarely, if ever, activated.

The estimated value of capacity is based primarily upon the type of facility and on roadway geometrics. Sections of roadway with adverse geometrics are characterized by lower freeflow speeds and lane capacity. Exhibit 1530 in the Highway Capacity Manual was referenced to estimate saturation flow rates. The impact of narrow lanes and shoulders on freeflow speed and on capacity is not material, particularly when flow is predominantly in one direction as is the case during an evacuation.

The procedure used here was to estimate "section" capacity, VE, based on observations made traveling over each section of the evacuation network, based on the posted speed limits and travel behavior of other motorists and by reference to the 2010 HCM. The DYNEV II simulation model determines for each highway section, represented as a network link, whether its capacity would be limited by the "sectionspecific" service volume, VE, or by the intersectionspecific capacity. For each link, the model selects the lower value of capacity.

3 Lei Zhang and David Levinson, Some Properties of Flows at Freeway Bottlenecks, Transportation Research Record 1883, 2004.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 45 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

4.3 Application to the SONGS Study Area As part of the development of the linknode analysis network for the study area, an estimate of roadway capacity is required. The source material for the capacity estimates presented herein is contained in:

2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)

Transportation Research Board National Research Council Washington, D.C.

The highway system in the study area consists primarily of three categories of roads and, of course, intersections:

TwoLane roads: Local, State MultiLane Highways (atgrade)

Freeways Each of these classifications will be discussed.

4.3.1 TwoLane Roads Ref: HCM Chapter 15 Two lane roads comprise the majority of highways within the EPZ. The perlane capacity of a twolane highway is estimated at 1700 passenger cars per hour (pc/h). This estimate is essentially independent of the directional distribution of traffic volume except that, for extended distances, the twoway capacity will not exceed 3200 pc/h. The HCM procedures then estimate Level of Service (LOS) and Average Travel Speed. The DYNEV II simulation model accepts the specified value of capacity as input and computes average speed based on the timevarying demand: capacity relations.

Based on the field survey and on expected traffic operations associated with evacuation scenarios:

Most sections of twolane roads within the EPZ are classified as Class I, with "level terrain"; some are rolling terrain.

Class II highways are mostly those within urban and suburban centers.

4.3.2 MultiLane Highway Ref: HCM Chapter 14 Exhibit 142 of the HCM 2010 presents a set of curves that indicate a perlane capacity ranging from approximately 1900 to 2200 pc/h, for freespeeds of 45 to 60 mph, respectively. Based on observation, the multilane highways outside of urban areas within the EPZ service traffic with freespeeds in this range. The actual timevarying speeds computed by the simulation model reflect the demand: capacity relationship and the impact of control at intersections. A San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 46 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

conservative estimate of perlane capacity of 1900 pc/h is adopted for this study for multilane highways outside of urban areas, as shown in Appendix K.

4.3.3 Freeways Ref: HCM Chapters 10, 11, 12, 13 Chapter 10 of the HCM 2010 describes a procedure for integrating the results obtained in Chapters 11, 12 and 13, which compute capacity and LOS for freeway components. Chapter 10 also presents a discussion of simulation models. The DYNEV II simulation model automatically performs this integration process.

Chapter 11 of the HCM 2010 presents procedures for estimating capacity and LOS for Basic Freeway Segments". Exhibit 1117 of the HCM 2010 presents capacity vs. free speed estimates, which are provided below.

Free Speed (mph): 55 60 65 70+

PerLane Capacity (pc/h): 2250 2300 2350 2400 The inputs to the simulation model are highway geometrics, freespeeds and capacity based on field observations. The simulation logic calculates actual timevarying speeds based on demand:

capacity relationships. A conservative estimate of perlane capacity of 2250 pc/h is adopted for this study for freeways, as shown in Appendix K.

Chapter 12 of the HCM 2010 presents procedures for estimating capacity, speed, density and LOS for freeway weaving sections. The simulation model contains logic that relates speed to demand volume: capacity ratio. The value of capacity obtained from the computational procedures detailed in Chapter 12 depends on the "Type" and geometrics of the weaving segment and on the "Volume Ratio" (ratio of weaving volume to total volume).

Chapter 13 of the HCM 2010 presents procedures for estimating capacities of ramps and of "merge" areas. There are three significant factors to the determination of capacity of a ramp freeway junction: The capacity of the freeway immediately downstream of an onramp or immediately upstream of an offramp; the capacity of the ramp roadway; and the maximum flow rate entering the ramp influence area. In most cases, the freeway capacity is the controlling factor. Values of this merge area capacity are presented in Exhibit 138 of the HCM 2010, and depend on the number of freeway lanes and on the freeway free speed. Ramp capacity is presented in Exhibit 1310 and is a function of the ramp free flow speed. The DYNEV II simulation model logic simulates the merging operations of the ramp and freeway traffic in accord with the procedures in Chapter 13 of the HCM 2010. If congestion results from an excess of demand relative to capacity, then the model allocates service appropriately to the two entering traffic streams and produces LOS F conditions (The HCM does not address LOS F explicitly).

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 47 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

4.3.4 Intersections Ref: HCM Chapters 18, 19, 20, 21 Procedures for estimating capacity and LOS for approaches to intersections are presented in Chapter 18 (signalized intersections), Chapters 19, 20 (unsignalized intersections) and Chapter 21 (roundabouts). The complexity of these computations is indicated by the aggregate length of these chapters. The DYNEV II simulation logic is likewise complex.

The simulation model explicitly models intersections: Stop/yield controlled intersections (both 2way and allway) and traffic signal controlled intersections. Where intersections are controlled by fixed time controllers, traffic signal timings are set to reflect average (non evacuation) traffic conditions. Actuated traffic signal settings respond to the timevarying demands of evacuation traffic to adjust the relative capacities of the competing intersection approaches.

The model is also capable of modeling the presence of manned traffic control. At specific locations where it is advisable or where existing plans call for overriding existing traffic control to implement manned control, the model will use actuated signal timings that reflect the presence of traffic guides. At locations where a special traffic control strategy (continuous left turns, contraflow lanes) is used, the strategy is modeled explicitly. Where applicable, the location and type of traffic control for nodes in the evacuation network are noted in Appendix K. The characteristics of the ten highest volume signalized intersections are detailed in Appendix J.

4.4 Simulation and Capacity Estimation Chapter 6 of the HCM is entitled, HCM and Alternative Analysis Tools. The chapter discusses the use of alternative tools such as simulation modeling to evaluate the operational performance of highway networks. Among the reasons cited in Chapter 6 to consider using simulation as an alternative analysis tool is:

The system under study involves a group of different facilities or travel modes with mutual interactions invoking several procedural chapters of the HCM. Alternative tools are able to analyze these facilities as a single system.

This statement succinctly describes the analyses required to determine traffic operations across an area encompassing an EPZ operating under evacuation conditions. The model utilized for this study, DYNEV II, is further described in Appendix C. It is essential to recognize that simulation models do not replicate the methodology and procedures of the HCM - they replace these procedures by describing the complex interactions of traffic flow and computing Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) detailing the operational performance of traffic over time and by location. The DYNEV II simulation model includes some HCM 2010 procedures only for the purpose of estimating capacity.

All simulation models must be calibrated properly with field observations that quantify the performance parameters applicable to the analysis network. Two of the most important of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 48 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

these are: (1) Free flow speed (FFS); and (2) saturation headway, hsat. The first of these is estimated by direct observation during the road survey; the second is estimated using the concepts of the HCM 2010, as described earlier. These parameters are listed in Appendix K, for each network link.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 49 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Volume, vph Capacity Drop Qmax R Qmax Qs Density, vpm Flow Regimes Speed, mph Free Forced vf R vc Density, vpm kf kopt kj ks Figure 41. Fundamental Diagrams San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 410 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5 ESTIMATION OF TRIP GENERATION TIME Federal Government guidelines (see NUREG CR7002) specify that the planner estimate the distributions of elapsed times associated with mobilization activities undertaken by the public to prepare for the evacuation trip. The elapsed time associated with each activity is represented as a statistical distribution reflecting differences between members of the public.

The quantification of these activitybased distributions relies largely on the results of the telephone survey. We define the sum of these distributions of elapsed times as the Trip Generation Time Distribution.

5.1 Background In general, an accident at a nuclear power plant is characterized by the following Emergency Classification Levels (see Appendix 1 of NUREG 0654 for details):

1. Unusual Event

2. Alert

3. Site Area Emergency

4. General Emergency At each level, the Federal guidelines specify a set of Actions to be undertaken by the Licensee, and by State and Local offsite authorities. As a Planning Basis, we will adopt a conservative posture, in accordance with Section 1.2 of NUREG/CR7002, that a rapidly escalating accident will be considered in calculating the Trip Generation Time. We will assume:

1. The Advisory to Evacuate will be announced coincident with the siren notification.

2. Mobilization of the general population will commence within 15 minutes after the siren notification.

3. ETE are measured relative to the Advisory to Evacuate.

We emphasize that the adoption of this planning basis is not a representation that these events will occur within the indicated time frame. Rather, these assumptions are necessary in order to:

1. Establish a temporal framework for estimating the Trip Generation distribution in the format recommended in Section 2.13 of NUREG/CR6863.

2. Identify temporal points of reference that uniquely define "Clear Time" and ETE.

It is likely that a longer time will elapse between the various classes of an emergency.

For example, suppose one hour elapses from the siren alert to the Advisory to Evacuate. In this case, it is reasonable to expect some degree of spontaneous evacuation by the public during this onehour period. As a result, the population within the EPZ will be lower when the Advisory to Evacuate is announced, than at the time of the siren alert. In addition, many will engage in preparation activities to evacuate, in anticipation that an Advisory will be broadcast.

Thus, the time needed to complete the mobilization activities and the number of people remaining to evacuate the EPZ after the Advisory to Evacuate, will both be somewhat less than San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 51 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

the estimates presented in this report. Consequently, the ETE presented in this report are higher than the actual evacuation time, if this hypothetical situation were to take place.

The notification process consists of two events:

1. Transmitting information using the alert notification systems available within the EPZ (e.g. sirens, tone alerts, EAS broadcasts, loud speakers).

2. Receiving and correctly interpreting the information that is transmitted.

The population within the EPZ is dispersed over an area of approximately 180 square miles and is engaged in a wide variety of activities. It must be anticipated that some time will elapse between the transmission and receipt of the information advising the public of an accident.

The amount of elapsed time will vary from one individual to the next depending on where that person is, what that person is doing, and related factors. Furthermore, some persons who will be directly involved with the evacuation process may be outside the EPZ at the time the emergency is declared. These people may be commuters, shoppers and other travelers who reside within the EPZ and who will return to join the other household members upon receiving notification of an emergency.

As indicated in Section 2.13 of NUREG/CR6863, the estimated elapsed times for the receipt of notification can be expressed as a distribution reflecting the different notification times for different people within, and outside, the EPZ. By using time distributions, it is also possible to distinguish between different population groups and different dayofweek and timeofday scenarios, so that accurate ETE may be computed.

For example, people at home or at work within the EPZ will be notified by siren, and/or tone alert and/or radio (if available). Those well outside the EPZ will be notified by telephone, radio, TV and wordofmouth, with potentially longer time lags. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of the EPZ population will differ with time of day families will be united in the evenings, but dispersed during the day. In this respect, weekends will differ from weekdays.

As indicated in Section 4.1 of NUREG/CR7002, the information required to compute trip generation times is typically obtained from a telephone survey of EPZ residents. Such a survey was conducted in support of this ETE study. Appendix F presents the survey sampling plan, survey instrument, and raw survey results. It is important to note that the shape and duration of the evacuation trip mobilization distribution is important at sites where traffic congestion is not expected to cause the evacuation time estimate to extend in time well beyond the trip generation period. The remaining discussion will focus on the application of the trip generation data obtained from the telephone survey to the development of the ETE documented in this report.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 52 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5.2 Fundamental Considerations The environment leading up to the time that people begin their evacuation trips consists of a sequence of events and activities. Each event (other than the first) occurs at an instant in time and is the outcome of an activity.

Activities are undertaken over a period of time. Activities may be in "series" (i.e. to undertake an activity implies the completion of all preceding events) or may be in parallel (two or more activities may take place over the same period of time). Activities conducted in series are functionally dependent on the completion of prior activities; activities conducted in parallel are functionally independent of one another. The relevant events associated with the public's preparation for evacuation are:

Event Number Event Description 1 Notification 2 Awareness of Situation 3 Depart Work 4 Arrive Home 5 Depart on Evacuation Trip Associated with each sequence of events are one or more activities, as outlined below:

Table 51. Event Sequence for Evacuation Activities Event Sequence Activity Distribution 12 Receive Notification 1 23 Prepare to Leave Work 2 2,3 4 Travel Home 3 2,4 5 Prepare to Leave to Evacuate 4 These relationships are shown graphically in Figure 51.

An Event is a state that exists at a point in time (e.g., depart work, arrive home)

An Activity is a process that takes place over some elapsed time (e.g., prepare to leave work, travel home)

As such, a completed Activity changes the state of an individual (e.g. the activity, travel home changes the state from depart work to arrive home). Therefore, an Activity can be described as an Event Sequence; the elapsed times to perform an event sequence vary from one person to the next and are described as statistical distributions on the following pages.

An employee who lives outside the EPZ will follow sequence (c) of Figure 51. A household within the EPZ that has one or more commuters at work, and will await their return before San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 53 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

beginning the evacuation trip will follow the first sequence of Figure 51(a). A household within the EPZ that has no commuters at work, or that will not await the return of any commuters, will follow the second sequence of Figure 51(a), regardless of day of week or time of day.

Households with no commuters on weekends or in the evening/nighttime, will follow the applicable sequence in Figure 51(b). Transients will always follow one of the sequences of Figure 51(b). Some transients away from their residence could elect to evacuate immediately without returning to the residence, as indicated in the second sequence.

It is seen from Figure 51, that the Trip Generation time (i.e. the total elapsed time from Event 1 to Event 5) depends on the scenario and will vary from one household to the next.

Furthermore, Event 5 depends, in a complicated way, on the time distributions of all activities preceding that event. That is, to estimate the time distribution of Event 5, we must obtain estimates of the time distributions of all preceding events. For this study, we adopt the conservative posture that all activities will occur in sequence.

In some cases, assuming certain events occur strictly sequential (for instance, commuter returning home before beginning preparation to leave) can result in rather conservative (that is, longer) estimates of mobilization times. It is reasonable to expect that at least some parts of these events will overlap for many households, but that assumption is not made in this study.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 54 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

1 2 3 4 5 Residents Households wait 1

for Commuters Households without Residents 1 2 5 Commuters and households who do not wait for Commuters (a) Accident occurs during midweek, at midday; year round Residents, Transients 1 2 4 5 Return to residence, away from then evacuate Residence Residents, 1 2 5 Residents at home; Transients at transients evacuate directly Residence (b) Accident occurs during weekend or during the evening2 1 2 3, 5 (c) Employees who live outside the EPZ ACTIVITIES EVENTS 1 2 Receive Notification 1. Notification 2 3 Prepare to Leave Work 2. Aware of situation 2, 3 4 Travel Home 3. Depart work 2, 4 5 Prepare to Leave to Evacuate 4. Arrive home

5. Depart on evacuation trip Activities Consume Time 1

Applies for evening and weekends also if commuters are at work.

2 Applies throughout the year for transients.

Figure 51. Events and Activities Preceding the Evacuation Trip San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 55 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5.3 Estimated Time Distributions of Activities Preceding Event 5 The time distribution of an event is obtained by "summing" the time distributions of all prior contributing activities. (This "summing" process is quite different than an algebraic sum since it is performed on distributions - not scalar numbers).

Time Distribution No. 1, Notification Process: Activity 1 2 In accordance with the 2012 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Manual, 100% of the population is notified within 45 minutes. It is assumed (based on the presence of sirens within the EPZ) that 87 percent of those within the EPZ will be aware of the accident within 30 minutes with the remainder notified within the following 15 minutes. The notification distribution is given below:

Table 52. Time Distribution for Notifying the Public Elapsed Time Percent of (Minutes) Population Notified 0 0%

5 7%

10 13%

15 27%

20 47%

25 66%

30 87%

35 92%

40 97%

45 100%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 56 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Distribution No. 2, Prepare to Leave Work: Activity 2 3 It is reasonable to expect that the vast majority of business enterprises within the EPZ will elect to shut down following notification and most employees would leave work quickly. Commuters, who work outside the EPZ could, in all probability, also leave quickly since facilities outside the EPZ would remain open and other personnel would remain. Personnel or farmers responsible for equipment/livestock would require additional time to secure their facility. The distribution of Activity 2 3 shown in Table 53 reflects data obtained by the telephone survey. This distribution is plotted in Figure 52.

Table 53. Time Distribution for Employees to Prepare to Leave Work Cumulative Cumulative Percent Percent Elapsed Time Employees Elapsed Time Employees (Minutes) Leaving Work (Minutes) Leaving Work 0 0% 45 94%

5 43% 50 94%

10 62% 55 94%

15 70% 60 97%

20 77% 75 98%

25 78% 90 100%

30 91%

35 92%

40 92%

NOTE: The survey data was normalized to distribute the "Don't know" response. That is, the sample was reduced in size to include only those households who responded to this question. The underlying assumption is that the distribution of this activity for the Dont know responders, if the event takes place, would be the same as those responders who provided estimates.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 57 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Distribution No. 3, Travel Home: Activity 3 4 These data are provided directly by those households which responded to the telephone survey. This distribution is plotted in Figure 52 and listed in Table 54.

Table 54. Time Distribution for Commuters to Travel Home Cumulative Cumulative Elapsed Time Percent Elapsed Time Percent (Minutes) Returning Home (Minutes) Returning Home 0 0% 45 88%

5 12% 50 89%

10 27% 55 89%

15 40% 60 95%

20 56% 75 96%

25 60% 90 98%

30 77% 105 99%

35 79% 120 100%

40 83%

NOTE: The survey data was normalized to distribute the "Don't know" response San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 58 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Distribution No. 4, Prepare to Leave Home: Activity 2, 4 5 These data are provided directly by those households which responded to the telephone survey. This distribution is plotted in Figure 52 and listed in Table 55.

Table 55. Time Distribution for Population to Prepare to Evacuate Cumulative Cumulative Elapsed Time Percent Ready to Elapsed Time Percent Ready to (Minutes) Evacuate (Minutes) Evacuate 0 0% 120 94%

15 20% 135 97%

30 63% 150 97%

45 70% 165 97%

60 83% 180 98%

75 89% 195 100%

90 90%

105 90%

NOTE: The survey data was normalized to distribute the "Don't know" response San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 59 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Mobilization Activities 100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

Notification 50%

Prepare to Leave Work 40% Travel Home

% Completing Activity Prepare Home 30%

20%

10%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Elapsed Time from Start of Mobilization Activity (min)

Figure 52. Evacuation Mobilization Activities San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 510 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5.4 Calculation of Trip Generation Time Distribution The time distributions for each of the mobilization activities presented herein must be combined to form the appropriate Trip Generation Distributions. As discussed above, this study assumes that the stated events take place in sequence such that all preceding events must be completed before the current event can occur. For example, if a household awaits the return of a commuter, the worktohome trip (Activity 3 4) must precede Activity 4 5.

To calculate the time distribution of an event that is dependent on two sequential activities, it is necessary to sum the distributions associated with these prior activities. The distribution summing algorithm is applied repeatedly as shown to form the required distribution. As an outcome of this procedure, new time distributions are formed; we assign letter designations to these intermediate distributions to describe the procedure. 6 presents the summing procedure to arrive at each designated distribution.

Table 56. Mapping Distributions to Events Apply Summing Algorithm To: Distribution Obtained Event Defined Distributions 1 and 2 Distribution A Event 3 Distributions A and 3 Distribution B Event 4 Distributions B and 4 Distribution C Event 5 Distributions 1 and 4 Distribution D Event 5 Table 57 presents a description of each of the final trip generation distributions achieved after the summing process is completed.

Table 57. Description of the Distributions Distribution Description Time distribution of commuters departing place of work (Event 3). Also applies A to employees who work within the EPZ who live outside, and to Transients within the EPZ.

B Time distribution of commuters arriving home (Event 4).

Time distribution of residents with commuters who return home, leaving home C

to begin the evacuation trip (Event 5).

Time distribution of residents without commuters returning home, leaving home D

to begin the evacuation trip (Event 5).

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 511 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5.4.1 Statistical Outliers As already mentioned, some portion of the survey respondents answer dont know to some questions or choose to not respond to a question. The mobilization activity distributions are based upon actual responses. But, it is the nature of surveys that a few numeric responses are inconsistent with the overall pattern of results. An example would be a case in which for 500 responses, almost all of them estimate less than two hours for a given answer, but 3 say four hours and 4 say six or more hours.

These outliers must be considered: are they valid responses, or so atypical that they should be dropped from the sample?

In assessing outliers, there are three alternates to consider:

1) Some responses with very long times may be valid, but reflect the reality that the respondent really needs to be classified in a different population subgroup, based upon special needs;

2) Other responses may be unrealistic (6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> to return home from commuting distance, or 2 days to prepare the home for departure);

3) Some high values are representative and plausible, and one must not cut them as part of the consideration of outliers.

The issue of course is how to make the decision that a given response or set of responses are to be considered outliers for the component mobilization activities, using a method that objectively quantifies the process.

There is considerable statistical literature on the identification and treatment of outliers singly or in groups, much of which assumes the data is normally distributed and some of which uses non parametric methods to avoid that assumption. The literature cites that limited work has been done directly on outliers in sample survey responses.

In establishing the overall mobilization time/trip generation distributions, the following principles are used:

1) It is recognized that the overall trip generation distributions are conservative estimates, because they assume a household will do the mobilization activities sequentially, with no overlap of activities;

2) The individual mobilization activities (prepare to leave work, travel home, prepare home) are reviewed for outliers, and then the overall trip generation distributions are created (see Figure 51, Table 56, Table 57);

3) Outliers can be eliminated either because the response reflects a special population (e.g.

special needs, transit dependent) or lack of realism, because the purpose is to estimate trip generation patterns for personal vehicles; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 512 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

4) To eliminate outliers, a) the mean and standard deviation of the specific activity are estimated from the responses, b) the median of the same data is estimated, with its position relative to the mean noted, c) the histogram of the data is inspected, and d) all values greater than 3.5 standard deviations are flagged for attention, taking special note of whether there are gaps (categories with zero entries) in the histogram display.

In general, only flagged values more than 4 standard deviations from the mean are allowed to be considered outliers, with gaps in the histogram expected.

When flagged values are classified as outliers and dropped, steps a to d are repeated.

5) As a practical matter, even with outliers eliminated by the above, the resultant histogram, viewed as a cumulative distribution, is not a normal distribution. A typical situation that results is shown below in Figure 53.

100.0%

90.0%

80.0%

Cumulative Percentage (%)

70.0%

60.0%

50.0%

40.0%

30.0%

20.0%

10.0%

0.0%

112.5 2.5 7.5 12.5 17.5 22.5 27.5 32.5 37.5 42.5 47.5 52.5 57.5 67.5 82.5 97.5 Center of Interval (minutes)

Cumulative Data Cumulative Normal Figure 53. Comparison of Data Distribution and Normal Distribution

6) In particular, the cumulative distribution differs from the normal distribution in two key aspects, both very important in loading a network to estimate evacuation times:

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 513 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Most of the real data is to the left of the normal curve above, indicating that the network loads faster for the first 8085% of the vehicles, potentially causing more (and earlier) congestion than otherwise modeled; The last 1015% of the real data tails off slower than the comparable normal curve, indicating that there is significant traffic still loading at later times.

Because these two features are important to preserve, it is the histogram of the data that is used to describe the mobilization activities, not a normal curve fit to the data. One could consider other distributions, but using the shape of the actual data curve is unambiguous and preserves these important features;

7) With the mobilization activities each modeled according to Steps 16, including preserving the features cited in Step 6, the overall (or total) mobilization times are constructed.

This is done by using the data sets and distributions under different scenarios (e.g. commuter returning, no commuter returning). In general, these are additive, using weighting based upon the probability distributions of each element; Figure 54 presents the combined trip generation distributions designated A, C, and D. These distributions are presented on the same time scale.

(As discussed earlier, the use of strictly additive activities is a conservative approach, because it makes all activities sequential - preparation for departure follows the return of the commuter. In practice, it is reasonable that some of these activities are done in parallel, at least to some extent -

for instance, preparation to depart begins by a household member at home while the commuter is still on the road.)

The mobilization distributions that result are used in their tabular/graphical form as direct inputs to later computations that lead to the ETE.

The DYNEV II simulation model is designed to accept varying rates of vehicle trip generation for each origin centroid, expressed in the form of histograms. These histograms, which represent Distributions A, C, and D, properly displaced with respect to one another, are tabulated in Table 58 (Distribution B, Arrive Home, omitted for clarity).

The final time period (15) is 600 minutes long. This time period is added to allow the analysis network to clear, in the event congestion persists beyond the trip generation period. Note that there are no trips generated during this final time period.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 514 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

5.4.2 Staged Evacuation Trip Generation As defined in NUREG/CR7002, staged evacuation consists of the following:

1. PAZ comprising the 2 mile region are advised to evacuate immediately

2. PAZ comprising regions extending from 2 to 5 miles downwind are advised to shelter in place while the 2 mile region is cleared

3. As vehicles evacuate the 2 mile region, sheltered people from 2 to 5 miles downwind continue preparation for evacuation

4. The population sheltering in the 2 to 5 mile region are advised to begin evacuating when approximately 90% of those originally within the 2 mile region evacuate across the 2 mile region boundary

5. Noncompliance with the shelter recommendation is the same as the shadow evacuation percentage of 20%

Assumptions

1. The EPZ population in PAZ beyond 5 miles will react as does the population in the 2 to 5 mile region; that is they will first shelter, then evacuate after the 90th percentile ETE for the 2 mile region

2. The population in the shadow region beyond the EPZ boundary, extending to approximately 15 miles radially from the plant, will react as they do for all nonstaged evacuation scenarios. That is 20% of these households will elect to evacuate with no shelter delay.

3. The transient population will not be expected to stage their evacuation because of the limited sheltering options available to people who may be at parks, on a beach, or at other venues. Also, notifying the transient population of a staged evacuation would prove difficult.

4. Employees will also be assumed to evacuate without first sheltering.

5. An additional staged evacuation in which PAZ 1 through 4 (5mile region) evacuates, and PAZ 5 is advised to shelterinplace until the 90th percentile ETE for the 5mile region was considered based on discussions with SCE and the offsite agencies.

Procedure

1. Trip generation for population groups in the 2 mile region will be as computed based upon the results of the telephone survey and analysis.

2. Trip generation for the population subject to staged evacuation will be formulated as follows:

a. Identify the 90th percentile evacuation time for the PAZ comprising the two mile region. This value, TScen*, is obtained from simulation results. It will become the time at which the region being sheltered will be told to evacuate for each scenario.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 515 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

b. The resultant trip generation curves for staging are then formed as follows:

i. The nonshelter trip generation curve is followed until a maximum of 20%

of the total trips are generated (to account for shelter noncompliance).

ii. No additional trips are generated until time TScen*

iii. Following time TScen*, the balance of trips are generated:

1. by stepping up and then following the nonshelter trip generation curve (if TScen* is < max trip generation time) or

2. by stepping up to 100% (if TScen* is > max trip generation time)

c. Note: This procedure implies that there may be different staged trip generation distributions for different scenarios. NUREG/CR7002 uses the statement approximately 90th percentile as the time to end staging and begin evacuating.

The value of TScen* is 1:30 for daytime scenarios, 2:00 for evening scenarios, and 5:00 for the Region R21 staged evacuation.

3. Staged trip generation distributions are created for the following population groups:

a. Residents with returning commuters

b. Residents without returning commuters

c. Residents with returning commuters during evening scenarios

d. Residents without returning commuters during evening scenarios Figure 55 presents the staged trip generation distributions for both residents with and without returning commuters; the 90th percentile twomile evacuation time is 90 minutes during the daytime, 120 minutes during evening scenarios, and 300 minutes for the Region R21 staged evacuation. At the 90th percentile evacuation time, 20% of the population (who normally would have completed their mobilization activities for an unstaged evacuation) advised to shelter has nevertheless departed the area. These people do not comply with the shelter advisory. Also included on the plot are the trip generation distributions for these groups as applied to the regions advised to evacuate immediately.

Since the 90th percentile evacuation time occurs before the end of the trip generation time, after the sheltered region is advised to evacuate, the shelter trip generation distribution rises to meet the balance of the nonstaged trip generation distribution. Following time TScen*, the balance of staged evacuation trips that are ready to depart are released within 15 minutes. After TScen*+15, the remainder of evacuation trips are generated in accordance with the unstaged trip generation distribution.

Table 59 and Table 510 provide the trip generation histograms for the staged evacuations.

5.4.3 Trip Generation for Waterways and Recreational Areas According to the Standard Operating Procedure for the State Department of Parks and Recreation (part of the County of Orange San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Emergency Operations Plan), the Department of Parks and Recreation (State Parks) is responsible for notifying the public in parks, beaches and campgrounds in the vicinity of SONGS. The plans also state that the U.S. Coast Guard has jurisdiction of the Pacific Ocean and that the Coast Guard will notify vessels at sea over marine radio and other means in the event of an emergency at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 516 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

SONGS. Coordination with the Coast Guard is the responsibility of San Diego County Office of Emergency Services.

As indicated in Table 52, this study assumes 100% notification in 45 minutes. Table 58 indicates that all transients will have mobilized within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />. It is assumed that this 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> timeframe is sufficient time for boaters, campers and other transients to return to their vehicles and begin their evacuation trip.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 517 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 58. Trip Generation Histograms for the EPZ Population for Unstaged Evacuation Percent of Total Trips Generated Within Indicated Time Period Residents Residents with Without Time Duration Employees Transients Commuters Commuters Period (Min) (Distribution A) (Distribution A) (Distribution C) (Distribution D) 1 15 7% 7% 0% 1%

2 15 34% 34% 0% 11%

3 15 34% 34% 3% 27%

4 15 15% 15% 10% 25%

5 15 5% 5% 16% 12%

6 15 3% 3% 17% 9%

7 15 1% 1% 14% 4%

8 15 1% 1% 11% 1%

9 15 0% 0% 8% 2%

10 15 0% 0% 5% 3%

11 60 0% 0% 12% 4%

12 30 0% 0% 2% 1%

13 30 0% 0% 1% 0%

14 30 0% 0% 1% 0%

15 600 0% 0% 0% 0%

NOTE:

Shadow vehicles are loaded onto the analysis network (Figure 12) using Distributions C for good weather.

Special event vehicles are loaded using Distribution A.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 518 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Trip Generation Distributions Employees/Transients Residents with Commuters Residents with no Commuters 100 80 60 40 20

% of Population Beginning Evacuation Trip 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed Time from Evacuation Advisory (min)

Figure 54. Comparison of Trip Generation Distributions San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 519 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 59. Trip Generation Histograms for the EPZ Population for Staged Evacuation Percent of Total Trips Generated Within Indicated Time Period*

Residents Residents Residents with Without Residents With Without Commuters Commuters Commuters Commuters Time Duration Daytime Daytime Evening Evening Period (Min) (Distribution C) (Distribution D) (Distribution E) (Distribution F) 1 15 0% 0% 0% 0%

2 15 0% 2% 0% 2%

3 15 1% 6% 1% 6%

4 15 2% 5% 2% 5%

5 15 3% 2% 3% 2%

6 15 3% 2% 3% 2%

7 15 51% 72% 3% 1%

8 15 11% 1% 2% 0%

9 15 8% 2% 65% 74%

10 15 5% 3% 5% 3%

11 60 12% 4% 12% 4%

12 30 2% 1% 2% 1%

13 30 1% 0% 1% 0%

14 30 1% 0% 1% 0%

15 600 0% 0% 0% 0%

• Trip Generation for Employees and Transients (see Table 58) is the same for Unstaged and Staged Evacuation.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 520 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 510. Trip Generation Histograms for the EPZ Population for Staged Evacuation for Region R21 Percent of Total Trips Generated Within Indicated Time Period*

Residents Residents with Without Time Duration Commuters Commuters Period (Min) (Distribution G) (Distribution H) 1 15 0% 0%

2 15 0% 2%

3 15 1% 6%

4 15 2% 5%

5 15 3% 2%

6 15 3% 2%

7 15 3% 1%

8 15 2% 0%

9 15 2% 0%

10 15 1% 1%

11 60 2% 1%

12 60 1% 0%

13 30 0% 0%

14 15 80% 80%

15 600 0% 0%

• Trip Generation for Employees and Transients (see Table 58) is the same for Unstaged and Staged Evacuation.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 521 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Staged and Unstaged Trip Generation Employees / Transients Residents with Commuters Residents with no Commuters Staged Residents with Commuters Midday Staged Residents with no Commuters Midday Staged Residents with Commuters Evening Staged Residents with no Commuters Evening Staged Residents with Commuters Region R21 Staged Residents with no Commuters Region R21 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20

% of Population Beginning Evacuation Trip 10 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Elapsed time from Evacuation Advisory (min)

Figure 55. Comparison of Staged and Unstaged Trip Generation Distributions San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 522 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

6 DEMAND ESTIMATION FOR EVACUATION SCENARIOS An evacuation case defines a combination of Evacuation Region and Evacuation Scenario.

The definitions of Region and Scenario are as follows:

Region A grouping of contiguous evacuating PAZ that forms either a keyhole sector based area, or a circular area within the EPZ, that must be evacuated in response to a radiological emergency.

Scenario A combination of circumstances, including time of day, day of week, season, and weather conditions. Scenarios define the number of people in each of the affected population groups and their respective mobilization time distributions.

A total of 21 Regions were defined which encompass all the groupings of PAZ considered.

These Regions are defined in Table 61. The PAZ configurations are identified in Figure 61.

Each keyhole sectorbased area consists of a central circle centered at the power plant, and three adjoining sectors, each with a central angle of 22.5 degrees, as per NUREG/CR7002 guidance. The central sector coincides with the wind direction. These sectors extend to 5 miles from the plant (Regions R04 through R09) or to the EPZ boundary (Regions R10 and R11).

Regions R01, R02 and R03 represent evacuations of circular areas with radii of 2, 5 and 10 miles, respectively. Regions R12 through R18 are identical to Regions R04 through R09 and R02, respectively; however, those PAZ between 2 miles and 5 miles are staged until 90% of the 2 mile region (Region R01) has evacuated.

A total of 13 Scenarios were evaluated for all Regions. Thus, there are a total of 21x13=273 evacuation cases. Table 62 is a description of all Scenarios.

Each combination of region and scenario implies a specific population to be evacuated. Table 63 presents the percentage of each population group estimated to evacuate for each scenario.

Table 64 presents the vehicle counts for each scenario for an evacuation of Region R03 - the entire EPZ.

The vehicle estimates presented in Section 3 are peak values. These peak values are adjusted to average values depending on the scenario and region being considered, using scenario and region specific percentages. The scenario percentages are presented in Table 63, while the regional percentages are provided in Table H1. The percentages presented in Table 63 were determined as follows:

The number of residents with commuters during the week (when workforce is at its peak) is equal to the product of 57% (the number of households with at least one commuter) and 36%

(the number of households with a commuter that would await the return of the commuter prior to evacuating). See assumption 3 in Section 2.3. It is estimated for weekend and evening scenarios that 10% of households with returning commuters will have a commuter at work during those times.

Employment is assumed to be at its peak (100%) during the winter, midweek, midday scenarios.

Employment is reduced slightly (96%) for summer, midweek, midday scenarios. This is based on San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 61 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

the estimation that 50% of the employees commuting into the EPZ will be on vacation for a week during the approximate 12 weeks of summer. It is further estimated that those taking vacation will be uniformly dispersed throughout the summer with approximately 4% of employees vacationing each week. It is further estimated that only 10% of the employees are working in the evenings and during the weekends.

Transient activity is estimated to be at its peak (100%) during summer weekends and less (80%)

during the week. As shown in Appendix E, there is a significant amount of lodging and campgrounds offering overnight accommodations in the EPZ; thus, transient activity is estimated to be high during evening hours - 50% for summer and 33% for winter. Transient activity is less during the winter months - 50% during the week and 65% on weekends.

Seasonal population is estimated to be 100% during summer months, and 0% during all other times.

As noted in the shadow footnote to Table 63, the shadow percentages are computed using a base of 20% (see assumption 5 in Section 2.2); to include the employees within the Shadow Region who may choose to evacuate, the voluntary evacuation is multiplied by a scenario specific proportion of employees to permanent residents in the Shadow Region. For example, using the values provided in Table 64 for Scenario 1, the shadow percentage is computed as follows:

18,560 20% 1 24%

16,982 65,816 One special event - Fourth of July Weekend - was considered as Scenario 11. Thus, the special event traffic is 100% evacuated for Scenario 11, and 0% for all other scenarios.

It is estimated that summer school enrollment is approximately 10% of enrollment during the regular school year for summer, midweek, midday scenarios. School is not in session during weekends and evenings, thus no buses for school children are needed under those circumstances. As discussed in Section 7, schools are in session during the winter season, midweek, midday and 100% of buses will be needed under those circumstances. Transit buses for the transitdependent population are set to 100% for all scenarios as it is assumed that the transitdependent population is present in the EPZ for all scenarios.

External traffic is estimated to be reduced by 60% during evening scenarios and is 100% for all other scenarios.

An additional earthquake scenario, Scenario 13, was also considered in which all bridges which are not retrofitted to withstand an earthquake in the EPZ are assumed to be inaccessible during the evacuation. These bridges are identified in Table 65 and mapped in Figure 62. It is also assumed that there would be no external traffic after a severe earthquake in Scenario 13.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 62 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 61. Description of Evacuation Regions Description PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R01 2Mile Region 2Mile Region x R02 5Mile Region 5Mile Region x x x x R03 Full EPZ Full EPZ x x x x x Evacuate 2Mile Region and Downwind to 5 Miles Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R04 NW, NNW, N P,Q,R,A,B x x R05 NNE x x x R06 NE, ENE, E, ESE C,D,E,F,G x x R07 SE x x x R08 SSE, S, SSW, SW, WSW, W H,J,K,L,M,N x x R09 WNW x x x Evacuate 5Mile Region and Downwind to EPZ Boundary Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 N/A WNW, NW, NNW, N Refer to R03 NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, SE, SSE, S, N/A Refer to R02 SSW, SW, WSW, W Evacuate 2Mile Region and Downwind to EPZ Boundary Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R10 NW, NNW, N P,Q,R,A,B x x x N/A NNE Refer to R05 N/A NE, ENE, E, ESE C,D,E,F,G Refer to R06 N/A SE, SSE Refer to R07 N/A S, SSW, SW, WSW, W H,J,K,L,M,N Refer to R08 R11 WNW x x x x Staged Evacuation 2Mile Region Evacuates, then Evacuate Downwind to 5 Miles Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R12 NW, NNW, N P,Q,R,A,B x x R13 NNE x x x R14 NE, ENE, E, ESE C,D,E,F,G x x R15 SE x x x R16 SSE, S, SSW, SW, WSW, W H,J,K,L,M,N x x R17 WNW x x x R18 5Mile Region x x x x SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions PAZ Region Description 1 2 3 4 5 R19 Evacuate PAZ 5 Only x R20 Evacuate 1,Shelter then Evacuate 2, 3, 4, 5 x x x x x R21 Evacuate 1, 2, 3, 4, Shelter then Evacuate 5 x x x x x PAZ(s) ShelterinPlace until 90% ETE for PAZ(s) ShelterinPlace PAZ(s) Evacuate Unstaged Region, then Evacuate San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 63 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 61. SONGS EPZ PAZs San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 64 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 62. Evacuation Scenario Definitions Day of Time of Scenario Season1 Week Day Weather Special 1 Summer Midweek Midday Good None 2 Summer Midweek Midday Rain None 3 Summer Weekend Midday Good None 4 Summer Weekend Midday Rain None Midweek, 5 Summer Evening Good None Weekend 6 Winter Midweek Midday Good None 7 Winter Midweek Midday Rain None 8 Winter Weekend Midday Good None 9 Winter Weekend Midday Rain None Midweek, 10 Winter Evening Good None Weekend 11 Summer Weekend Midday Good 4th of July Weekend Roadway Impact - Single 12 Summer Midweek Midday Good Lane Closure on I5 Northbound 13 Summer Midweek Midday Good Earthquake 1

Winter means that school is in session (also applies to spring and autumn). Summer means that school is not in session.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 65 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 63. Percent of Population Groups Evacuating for Various Scenarios Households Households With Without External Returning Returning Special Seasonal School Transit Through Scenario Commuters Commuters Employees Transients Shadow Event Population Buses Buses Traffic 1 21% 79% 96% 80% 24% 0% 100% 10% 100% 100%

2 21% 79% 96% 80% 24% 0% 100% 10% 100% 100%

3 2% 98% 10% 100% 20% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100%

4 2% 98% 10% 100% 20% 0% 100% 0% 100% 100%

5 2% 98% 10% 50% 20% 0% 100% 0% 100% 40%

6 21% 79% 100% 50% 25% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100%

7 21% 79% 100% 50% 25% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100%

8 2% 98% 10% 65% 20% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%

9 2% 98% 10% 65% 20% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%

10 2% 98% 10% 33% 20% 0% 0% 0% 100% 40%

11 2% 98% 10% 100% 20% 100% 100% 0% 100% 100%

12 21% 79% 96% 80% 24% 0% 100% 10% 100% 100%

13 21% 79% 96% 80% 24% 0% 100% 10% 100% 0%

Resident Households with Commuters ......... Households of EPZ residents who await the return of commuters prior to beginning the evacuation trip.

Resident Households with No Commuters .... Households of EPZ residents who do not have commuters or will not await the return of commuters prior to beginning the evacuation trip.

Employees ................................................... EPZ employees who live outside the EPZ Transients .................................................... People who are in the EPZ at the time of an accident for recreational or other (nonemployment) purposes.

Shadow ........................................................ Residents and employees in the shadow region (outside of the EPZ) who will spontaneously decide to relocate during the evacuation. The basis for the values shown is a 20% relocation of shadow residents along with a proportional percentage of shadow employees.

Special Events .............................................. Additional vehicles in the EPZ due to the identified special event.

Seasonal Population ..................................... People who visit the EPZ and stay considerably longer than the average transient using condos, beach houses, or rentals.

School and Transit Buses .............................. Vehicleequivalents present on the road during evacuation servicing schools and transitdependent people (1 bus is equivalent to 2 passenger vehicles).

External Through Traffic ............................... Traffic on interstates/freeways and major arterial roads at the start of the evacuation. This traffic is stopped by access control approximately 30 minutes after the evacuation begins.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 66 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 64. Vehicle Estimates by Scenario Households Households With Without External Total Returning Returning Special Seasonal School Transit Through Scenario Scenario Commuters Commuters Employees Transients Shadow Event Population Buses Buses Traffic Vehicles 1 16,982 65,816 18,560 7,383 14,677 1,097 101 302 5,536 130,454 2 16,982 65,816 18,560 7,383 14,677 1,097 101 302 5,536 130,454 3 1,698 81,100 1,933 9,229 12,270 1,097 302 5,536 113,165 4 1,698 81,100 1,933 9,229 12,270 1,097 302 5,536 113,165 5 1,698 81,100 1,933 4,615 12,270 1,097 302 2,214 105,229 6 16,982 65,816 19,333 4,615 14,789 1,012 302 5,536 128,385 7 16,982 65,816 19,333 4,615 14,789 1,012 302 5,536 128,385 8 1,698 81,100 1,933 5,999 12,270 302 5,536 108,838 9 1,698 81,100 1,933 5,999 12,270 302 5,536 108,838 10 1,698 81,100 1,933 3,046 12,270 302 2,214 102,563 11 1,698 81,100 1,933 9,229 12,270 64,239 1,097 302 5,536 177,404 12 16,982 65,816 18,560 7,383 14,677 1,097 102 302 5,536 130,454 13 16,982 65,816 18,560 7,383 14,677 1,097 101 302 124,616 Note: Vehicle estimates are for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 67 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 65. List of NonRetrofitted Bridge Structures in the SONGS EPZ Year Bridge Road\Waterway Length Built\Year ID Route District Number City Overpassed (M) Wid. Ext.

1 I5 12 550205 San Clemente Avenida Palizada 49.7 1960\1981 2 I5 12 550204 San Clemente Avenida Presido 43.6 1960\1981 3 I5 12 550207 San Clemente Avenida Pico 42.7 1960\1981 4 I5 12 550223 San Clemente Avenida Vaquero 53.0 1981 S.R. 1\Camino Las 5 I5 12 550226 Dana Point 69.8 1960\1973 Ramblas San Juan 5 I5 12 550230 El Horno St 54.2 1958\1969 Capistrano San Juan 7 I5 12 550231 Junipero Serra Rd 38.1 1958\1969 Capistrano San Juan 8 I5 12 550289 Trabuco Creek 72.8 1959\1969 Capistrano San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 68 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 62. NonRetrofitted Bridge Structures in the SONGS EPZ San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 69 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

7 GENERAL POPULATION EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATES (ETE)

This section presents the ETE results of the computer analyses using the DYNEV II System described in Appendices B, C and D. These results cover 21 regions within the SONGS EPZ and the 13 Evacuation Scenarios discussed in Section 6.

The ETE for all Evacuation Cases are presented in Table 71 and Table 72. These tables present the estimated times to clear the indicated population percentages from the Evacuation Regions for all Evacuation Scenarios. The ETE of the 2mile region in both staged and unstaged regions are presented in Table 73 and Table 74. The ETE of the 5mile region in both staged and un staged regions are presented in Table 75 and Table 76. Table 77 defines the Evacuation Regions considered. The tabulated values of ETE are obtained from the DYNEV II System outputs which are generated at 5minute intervals.

7.1 Voluntary Evacuation and Shadow Evacuation Voluntary evacuees are people within the EPZ in PAZ for which an Advisory to Evacuate has not been issued, yet who elect to evacuate. Shadow evacuation is the voluntary outward movement of some people from the Shadow Region (outside the EPZ) for whom no protective action recommendation has been issued. Both voluntary and shadow evacuations are assumed to take place over the same time frame as the evacuation from within the impacted Evacuation Region.

The ETE for the SONGS EPZ addresses the issue of voluntary evacuees in the manner shown in Figure 71. Within the EPZ, 20 percent of people located in PAZ outside of the evacuation region who are not advised to evacuate, are assumed to elect to evacuate. Similarly, it is assumed that 20 percent of those people in the Shadow Region will choose to leave the area.

Figure 72 presents the area identified as the Shadow Region. This region extends radially from the plant to cover a region between the EPZ boundary and approximately 15 miles. The population and number of evacuating vehicles in the Shadow Region were estimated using the same methodology that was used for permanent residents within the EPZ (see Section 3.1). As discussed in Section 3.2, it is estimated that a total of 111,045 people reside in the Shadow Region; 20 percent of them would evacuate. See Table 64 for the number of evacuating vehicles from the Shadow Region.

Traffic generated within this Shadow Region, traveling away from the SONGS location, has the potential for impeding evacuating vehicles from within the Evacuation Region. All ETE calculations include this shadow traffic movement.

7.2 Staged Evacuation As defined in NUREG/CR7002, staged evacuation consists of the following:

1. PAZ comprising the 2 mile region are advised to evacuate immediately.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 71 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

2. PAZ comprising regions extending from 2 to 5 miles downwind are advised to shelter in place while the two mile region is cleared.

3. As vehicles evacuate the 2 mile region, people from 2 to 5 miles downwind continue preparation for evacuation while they shelter.

4. The population sheltering in the 2 to 5 mile region is advised to evacuate when approximately 90% of the 2 mile region evacuating traffic crosses the 2 mile region boundary.

5. Noncompliance with the shelter recommendation is the same as the shadow evacuation percentage of 20%.

A second staged evacuation was considered for this study and consists of the following:

1. PAZ 1 through 4 (5mile region) are advised to evacuate immediately.

2. PAZ 5 is advised to shelterinplace while the 5mile region is cleared.

3. As vehicles evacuate the 5mile region, people in PAZ 5 continue preparation for evacuation while they shelter.

4. The population sheltering in PAZ 5 is advised to evacuate when approximately 90% of the 5mile region evacuating traffic crosses the 5mile region boundary.

5. Noncompliance with the shelter recommendation is the same as the shadow evacuation percentage of 20%.

See Section 5.4.2 for additional information on staged evacuation.

7.3 Patterns of Traffic Congestion during Evacuation Figure 73 through Figure 79 illustrate the patterns of traffic congestion that arise for the case when the entire EPZ (Region R03) is advised to evacuate during the summer, midweek, midday period under good weather conditions (Scenario 1).

Traffic congestion, as the term is used here, is defined as Level of Service (LOS) F. LOS F is defined as follows (HCM 2010, page 55):

The HCM uses LOS F to define operations that have either broken down (i.e., demand exceeds capacity) or have exceeded a specified service measure value, or combination of service measure values, that most users would consider unsatisfactory. However, particularly for planning applications where different alternatives may be compared, analysts may be interested in knowing just how bad the LOS F condition is. Several measures are available to describe individually, or in combination, the severity of a LOS F condition:

• Demandtocapacity ratios describe the extent to which capacity is exceeded during the analysis period (e.g., by 1%, 15%, etc.);

• Duration of LOS F describes how long the condition persists (e.g., 15 min, 1 h, 3 h); and San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 72 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

• Spatial extent measures describe the areas affected by LOS F conditions. These include measures such as the back of queue, and the identification of the specific intersection approaches or system elements experiencing LOS F conditions.

All highway "links" which experience LOS F are delineated in these figures by a thick red line; all others are lightly indicated. Congestion develops rapidly around concentrations of population and traffic bottlenecks. Figure 73 displays the developing congestion within the population centers of San Clemente, Dana Point and San Juan Capistrano, just 30 minutes after the Advisory to Evacuate (ATE). Note that Interstate5 (I5), which is servicing both the external external trips and the evacuating trips, is displaying heavy traffic demand (LOS D). The plant access road and Old Pacific Hwy are congested (see inset map to Figure 73) as workers evacuating from San Onofre and transients evacuating from San Onofre State Beach queue to access the onramps to I5. The onramps to I5 Northbound in San Clemente are already congested, as well as the major arterials leading to these ramps (El Camino Real, Avenida Pico, Avenida Vista Hermosa and Camino de los Mares). TCPs at these intersections force evacuees onto I5 Northbound. Pacific Coast Hwy in Capistrano Beach is already congested as evacuees from Capistrano Beach and San Clemente access SR1. Congestion begins to build in Dana Point and in San Juan Capistrano along Camino Capistrano.

At one hour after the ATE, Figure 74 displays traffic congestion in all populated areas within the EPZ. The plant access road and Old Pacific Hwy are still congested. Congestion begins to build in MCB along San Mateo Dr and Basilone Rd. San Mateo Dr is congested as those evacuees from Camp San Mateo (52/53 Area) encounter a stop sign at the intersection with Basilone Rd. Basilone Rd is experiencing LOS F as speeds drop through Camp San Onofre (51/52 Area), Camp Horno (53 Area), and Camp Las Pulgas (43 Area). Dana Point and San Juan Capistrano are now fully congested. I5 northbound is now operating at LOS F through the city of San Clemente and parts of the city of San Juan Capistrano. I5 southbound is clear of congestion south of San Clemente. Vehicles in San Clemente are queued along the major arterials accessing I5 northbound ramps. Pacific Coast Hwy and El Camino Real are now fully congested in Capistrano Beach and San Clemente.

At two hours after the ATE, congestion in San Clemente and Dana Point persists and congestion in San Juan Capistrano begins to subside, as shown in Figure 75. San Clemente remains fully congested, as almost all evacuees have mobilized and begun their evacuation trip. Congestion in MCB persists southbound through Camp San Mateo, Camp San Onofre and Camp Horno, and begins to subside in Camp Las Pulgas. The plant access road and Old Pacific Hwy are now clear of congestion. The only congestion that persists in PAZ 1 is along Basilone Rd exiting MCB.

At three hours after the ATE, the 2mile region is clear of congestion (LOS F) in Figure 76.

Congestion is beginning to clear in Dana Point and San Juan Capistrano, while San Clemente is still fully congested as vehicles attempt to access the ramps onto I5 NB. Congestion remains in MCB outside of the 2mile region on Basilone Rd as well as San Mateo Dr.

At four hours after the ATE, the 2mile region is clear of traffic, as shown in Figure 77.

Congestion persists along Basilone Rd southbound in MCB and along the major arterials as well San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 73 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

as I5 NB in the San Clemente area. Congestion along El Camino Real and Pacific Coast Hwy continues to dissipate and the congestion in Dana Point and San Juan Capistrano has cleared.

At six hours after the ATE, congestion (LOS F) in MCB is now clear, as shown in Figure 78.

While congestion persists along the major arterials in San Clemente accessing the I5 northbound onramps, all roads west of I5 in San Clemente are clear of congestion. The congestion in San Clemente is now a result of the limited capacity of the onramps to access I5 northbound. TCPs continue to force all evacuees onto these ramps to exit the area. Congestion along Pacific Coast Hwy in Capistrano Beach has almost completely subsided.

At six hours and twenty minutes after the ATE, the EPZ is clear of congestion as shown in Figure

79. The last remnants of traffic congestion to clear in the EPZ were onramps to I5 northbound in the city of San Clemente at 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and 20 minutes.

7.4 Evacuation Rates Evacuation is a continuous process, as implied by Figure 710 through Figure 722. These figures indicate the rate at which traffic flows out of the indicated areas for the case of an evacuation of the full EPZ (Region R03) under the indicated conditions. One figure is presented for each scenario considered.

As indicated in Figure 710, vehicles begin to evacuate the area slowly at first, as people respond to the ATE at different rates. Then traffic demand builds rapidly (slopes of the curves increase). When the system becomes congested, traffic exits the EPZ at rates somewhat below capacity until some evacuation routes have cleared. As more routes clear, the aggregate rate of egress slows since many vehicles have already left the EPZ. Towards the end of the process, relatively few evacuation routes service the remaining demand.

The rate of egress for the 5mile region, however, remains relatively constant throughout the course of the evacuation. This is due to the limited number of evacuation routes out of San Clemente to the north, and the fact that the area remains fully saturated for almost the entirety of the evacuation, as discussed in section 7.3. TCPs in San Clemente direct evacuees onto I5 northbound. The limited capacity of these on ramps meter vehicles onto I5, creating a constant flow of vehicles until the end of the evacuation. This effect also impacts the curve for the entire EPZ as well.

Conversely, the rate of egress for the 2mile region has a long tail as congestion in this region begins to dissipate much earlier than in the 5mile region, as depicted in Figure 76. This decline in aggregate flow rate, towards the end of the process, is characterized by these curves flattening and gradually becoming horizontal.

Ideally, it would be desirable to fully saturate all evacuation routes equally so that all will service traffic near capacity levels and all will clear at the same time. For this ideal situation, all curves would retain the same slope until the end - thus minimizing evacuation time. In reality, this ideal is generally unattainable reflecting the spatial variation in population density, mobilization rates and in highway capacity over the EPZ.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 74 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

7.5 Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) Results Table 71 and Table 72 present the ETE values for all 21 Evacuation Regions and all 14 Evacuation Scenarios. Table 73 and Table 74 present the ETE values for the 2mile region for both staged and unstaged (concurrent) keyhole regions downwind to 5 miles. Table 75 and Table 76 present the ETE values for the 5mile region for both staged and unstaged keyhole regions downwind to the EPZ boundary. The tables are organized as follows:

Table Contents ETE represents the elapsed time required for 90 percent of the 71 population within a Region, to evacuate from that Region. All Scenarios are considered, as well as Staged Evacuation regions.

ETE represents the elapsed time required for 100 percent of the 72 population within a Region, to evacuate from that Region. All Scenarios are considered, as well as Staged Evacuation regions.

ETE represents the elapsed time required for 90 percent of the 73 population within the 2mile Region, to evacuate from that Region with both Concurrent and Staged Evacuations.

ETE represents the elapsed time required for 100 percent of the 74 population within the 2mile Region, to evacuate from that Region with both Concurrent and Staged Evacuations.

ETE represents the elapsed time required for 90 percent of the 75 population within the 5mile Region, to evacuate from that Region with both Concurrent and Staged Evacuations.

ETE represents the elapsed time required for 100 percent of the 76 population within the 5mile Region, to evacuate from that Region with both Concurrent and Staged Evacuations.

The animation snapshots described above reflect the ETE statistics for the concurrent (un staged) evacuation scenarios and regions, which are displayed in Figure 73 through Figure 79.

Most of the congestion is located in San Clemente (PAZ 4), which is beyond 2 miles; this is reflected in the ETE statistics:

The 90th percentile ETE for Region R02 (5mile region) is approximately 3 1/2 hours longer, on average, than Region R01 (2mile region).

The 90th percentile ETE for those keyhole regions which include PAZ 4 (Regions R04, R05, R09, R10, and R11) are longer than those regions which do not include PAZ 4.

The 100th percentile ETE for the 2mile region is comparable to mobilization time. This fact implies that the congestion within the 2mile region dissipates prior to the end of mobilization, as is displayed in Figure 77 and discussed in Sections 7.3 and 7.4. However, for those evacuation regions that extend beyond 2miles, ETE is significantly longer than mobilization San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 75 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

time, implying that traffic congestion does not clear prior to the completion of mobilization time, as seen in Figure 78 and discussed in Section 7.3. The congestion is pronounced in San Clemente (PAZ 4); the 100th percentile ETE for regions including the city of San Clemente are approximately 1:00 to 1:45 longer than mobilization time for nonspecial event scenarios.

Comparison of Scenarios 3 and 11 in Table 71 indicates that the Special Event - Fourth of July Weekend - has a significant impact on the ETE at the 90th percentile. The additional 64,239 vehicles present in the EPZ increase congestion on the local roads, especially within Dana Point, and to a lesser extent, San Clemente. For those evacuation regions which include San Clemente, but not Dana Point, the 90th percentile ETE increases by up to 40 minutes. For those evacuation regions which include Dana Point, the 90th percentile ETE increases by up to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.

The special event has a significant impact on the 100th percentile ETE as well, with increases of up to 45 minutes for regions which include San Clemente and increases of up to 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> and 25 minutes for regions which include Dana Point.

Comparison of Scenarios 1 and 12 in Table 71 indicates that the roadway closure - one lane northbound on I5 from SONGS (approximately 2 miles south of Basilone Rd - Exit 71) to the end of the analysis network at the interchange with Oso Parkway (Exit 88) does have a significant impact on the 90th and 100th percentile ETE for keyhole regions which involve the direct evacuation of PAZ 4 and 5, with up to 1:20 and 1:45 increases in ETE, respectively. The evacuation of San Clemente and San Juan Capistrano routes evacuees on to I5 northbound.

With a lane closed on I5 northbound, the capacity of I5 is reduced by 2025%, increasing congestion and prolonging evacuation. Regions which only evacuate PAZ 1 and PAZ 3 (MCB) are not impacted by the roadway closure.

The results of the roadway impact scenario indicate that events such as traffic accidents which close a lane on I5, could impact ETE. State and local police could consider traffic management tactics such as using the shoulder of the roadway as a travel lane or rerouting of traffic along other evacuation routes to avoid overwhelming I5. All efforts should be made to remove any blockage on I5 as quickly as possible during an evacuation.

Comparison of Scenarios 1 and 13 in Table 71 indicates that a severe earthquake has a significant impact on the 90th percentile ETE, with increases of up to 9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br /> and 15 minutes.

The inaccessible bridges reduce the already limited number of exit points out of the City of San Clemente forcing evacuees to rely primarily on El Camino Real into Capistrano Beach. The earthquake also has a significant impact on the 100th percentile ETE with increases of up to 13 hours1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br />, as indicated in Table 72.

The results of the earthquake scenario indicate that all efforts should be made to inspect the integrity of the bridges within the EPZ after an earthquake and repair and reopen bridges if possible. Allowing evacuees to use I5 southbound could also be considered, but the potential exposure to radioactivity by the evacuees must be considered as evacuees would be routed closer to SONGS. If a release is expected in a timeframe shorter than the ETE, sheltering in place could be considered.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 76 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

7.6 Staged Evacuation Results Table 73 and Table 74 present a comparison of the ETE for the 2mile region compiled for the concurrent and staged evacuation studies. Note that Regions R12 through R18 are the same geographic areas as Regions R04 through R09 and R02, respectively.

To determine whether the staged evacuation strategy is worthy of consideration, one must show that the ETE for the 2mile region can be reduced without significantly affecting the region between 2 miles and 5 miles. As indicated in Table 73, the ETE for the 2mile region does not decrease for any region when staging evacuation. As discussed in Section 7.3, congestion in San Clemente is concentrated along the onramps to I5 and those arterials that access I5. Congestion on I5 northbound never backs up into the 2mile region. Consequently, the impedance due to this congestion within San Clemente to evacuees from within the 2mile region is not sufficient to significantly influence the 90th percentile ETE for the 2mile region.

Note that the ETE in Table 73 for the 2mile area increases by about 30 minutes when evacuating those regions (R02, R04, R05, R09, R12, R13, R17 and R18) wherein PAZ 4 evacuates.

This increase in ETE for the 2mile region is an anomaly and is not due to congestion. There is resident population (evacuating in approximately 2,000 vehicles) in the southeast corner of PAZ 4 that uses Cristianitos Rd to access I5 northbound. This route brings vehicles from beyond 2 miles into the 2mile region. These resident vehicles have longer mobilization times than the transients and employees that constitute the vast majority of the 2mile region population.

Also, these residents shelter in place for 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> and 30 minutes before evacuating. The delayed departure of these vehicles and the use of a route that enters the 2mile region is the cause of the 30 minute increase in ETE.

Table 74 indicates that the 100th percentile ETE for both unstaged and staged evacuation of the 2mile region for all regions and scenarios is roughly 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />, which reflects the trip generation time, rather than traffic congestion. There is no benefit of staging at the 100th percentile.

Comparing Regions R12 through R18 and Regions R04 through R09 and R02 in Table 71 reveals that staging retards the 90th percentile ETE for those in the 2 to 5mile region by up to 55 minutes. This extending of ETE is due to the delay in beginning the evacuation trip, experienced by those who shelter, plus the effect of the tripgeneration spike (significant volume of traffic beginning the evacuation trip at the same time - see Figure 55) that follows their eventual ATE, in creating congestion within the EPZ area beyond 2 miles.

Two additional staged regions were considered, Regions R20 and R21, both of which are the same as Region R03 except for the staged evacuation of some PAZ. Comparing Regions R20 and R03 in Table 73 indicates that there is not a material benefit to evacuees from within the 2 mile region. However, comparing these regions in Table 71 and Table 72 indicate that staging retards the 90th and 100th percentile ETE by up to 15 minutes. Comparing Regions R21 and R03 in Table 75 indicates that there is no significant benefit to evacuees from within the 5mile region when staging the evacuation of PAZ 5. Consequently, comparing these regions in Table San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 77 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

71 and Table 72 indicate there are increases in the 90th and 100th percentile ETE by up to one hour and forty minutes, and one hour and ten minutes, respectively.

In summary, staged evacuation of the 2mile region in not beneficial for evacuating the resident population within the 2mile region of SONGS.

7.7 Guidance on Using ETE Tables The user first determines the percentile of population for which the ETE is sought (The NRC guidance calls for the 90th percentile). The applicable value of ETE within the chosen Table may then be identified using the following procedure:

1. Identify the applicable Scenario:

• Season Summer Winter (also Autumn and Spring)

• Day of Week Midweek Weekend

• Time of Day Midday Evening

• Weather Condition Good Weather Rain

• Special Event Fourth of July Weekend Road Closure (A lane on I5 NB is closed)

Earthquake

• Evacuation Staging No, Staged Evacuation is not considered Yes, Staged Evacuation is considered While these Scenarios are designed, in aggregate, to represent conditions throughout the year, some further clarification is warranted:

• The conditions of a summer evening (either midweek or weekend) and rain are not explicitly identified in the Tables. For these conditions, Scenarios (2) and (4) apply.

• The conditions of a winter evening (either midweek or weekend) and rain are not explicitly identified in the Tables. For these conditions, Scenarios (7) and (9) for rain apply.

• The seasons are defined as follows:

Summer assumes that public schools are not in session.

Winter (includes Spring and Autumn) considers that public schools are in session.

• Time of Day: Midday implies the time over which most commuters are at work or are travelling to/from work.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 78 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

2. With the desired percentile ETE and Scenario identified, now identify the Evacuation Region:

• Determine the projected azimuth direction of the plume (coincident with the wind direction). This direction is expressed in terms of compass orientation: towards N, NNE, NE

• Determine the distance that the Evacuation Region will extend from the nuclear power plant. The applicable distances and their associated candidate Regions are given below:

2 Miles (Region R01)

To 5 Miles (Region R02, R04 through R09)

To EPZ Boundary (Regions R03, R10 and R11)

• Enter Table 77 and identify the applicable group of candidate Regions based on the distance that the selected Region extends from the plant. Select the Evacuation Region identifier in that row, based on the azimuth direction of the plume, from the first column of the Table.

3. Determine the ETE Table based on the percentile selected. Then, for the Scenario identified in Step 1 and the Region identified in Step 2, proceed as follows:

• The columns of Table 71 are labeled with the Scenario numbers. Identify the proper column in the selected Table using the Scenario number defined in Step 1.

• Identify the row in this table that provides ETE values for the Region identified in Step 2.

• The unique data cell defined by the column and row so determined contains the desired value of ETE expressed in Hours:Minutes.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 79 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Example It is desired to identify the ETE for the following conditions:

• Sunday, August 10th at 4:00 AM.

• It is raining.

• Wind direction is toward the northeast (NE).

• Wind speed is such that the distance to be evacuated is judged to be a 2mile radius and downwind to 5 miles.

• The desired ETE is that value needed to evacuate 90 percent of the population from within the impacted Region.

• A staged evacuation is not desired.

Table 71 is applicable because the 90th percentile ETE is desired. Proceed as follows:

1. Identify the Scenario as summer, weekend, evening and raining. Entering Table 71, it is seen that there is no match for these descriptors. However, the clarification given above assigns this combination of circumstances to Scenario 4.

2. Enter Table 77 and locate the Region described as Evacuate 2Mile Radius and Downwind to 5 Miles for wind direction toward the NE and read Region R06 in the first column of that row.

3. Enter Table 71 to locate the data cell containing the value of ETE for Scenario 4 and Region R06. This data cell is in column (4) and in the row for Region R06; it contains the ETE value of 3:15.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 710 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 71. Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 90 Percent of the Affected Population Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) Scenario:

Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Region Rain Rain Rain Rain Earthquake Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 2Mile Region, 5Mile Region, and EPZ R01 1:35 1:40 1:35 1:40 2:20 1:40 1:45 1:40 1:45 2:25 1:30 1:40 3:00 R01 R02 5:10 5:45 4:35 5:00 4:25 5:15 5:45 4:30 4:55 4:20 5:10 6:20 11:35 R02 R03 4:50 5:25 4:20 4:45 4:05 4:50 5:25 4:10 4:40 4:05 6:10 5:55 13:50 R03 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R04 5:10 5:45 4:25 4:50 4:15 5:15 5:40 4:20 4:45 4:10 5:05 6:25 11:55 R04 R05 5:10 5:45 4:35 5:00 4:25 5:15 5:45 4:30 4:55 4:20 5:10 6:20 11:35 R05 R06 3:05 3:20 3:00 3:15 3:25 3:10 3:25 3:05 3:15 3:30 3:00 3:05 4:05 R06 R07 3:05 3:20 3:00 3:15 3:25 3:10 3:25 3:05 3:15 3:30 3:00 3:05 4:05 R07 R08 1:35 1:40 1:35 1:40 2:20 1:40 1:45 1:40 1:45 2:25 1:30 1:40 3:00 R08 R09 5:10 5:45 4:25 4:50 4:15 5:15 5:40 4:20 4:45 4:10 5:05 6:25 11:55 R09 2Mile Region and Keyhole to EPZ Boundary R10 4:45 5:20 4:15 4:35 3:55 4:45 5:20 4:00 4:30 3:50 6:15 6:00 14:00 R10 R11 4:45 5:20 4:15 4:35 3:55 4:45 5:20 4:00 4:30 3:50 6:15 6:00 14:00 R11 Staged Evacuation 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R12 5:05 5:40 4:30 5:00 4:20 5:10 5:40 4:25 4:50 4:20 5:05 6:25 11:25 R12 R13 5:10 5:45 4:40 5:05 4:35 5:15 5:45 4:35 5:00 4:35 5:10 6:20 11:10 R13 R14 3:30 3:35 3:25 3:40 3:55 3:30 3:40 3:30 3:40 4:00 3:30 3:30 4:10 R14 R15 3:55 4:10 3:55 4:10 4:10 4:00 4:15 3:55 4:10 4:10 3:55 4:00 4:35 R15 R16 1:40 1:40 1:40 1:45 2:20 1:45 1:45 1:45 1:45 2:20 1:35 1:40 3:00 R16 R17 5:05 5:40 4:30 5:00 4:20 5:10 5:40 4:25 4:50 4:20 5:05 6:25 11:25 R17 R18 5:10 5:45 4:40 5:05 4:35 5:15 5:45 4:35 5:00 4:35 5:10 6:20 11:10 R18 SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions R19 2:10 2:10 2:00 2:05 2:20 2:10 2:10 2:05 2:10 2:20 1:50 2:20 3:05 R19 R20 4:50 5:30 4:25 4:55 4:20 4:50 5:25 4:20 4:45 4:15 6:20 6:00 14:05 R20 R21 5:55 6:15 5:50 6:00 4:20 5:55 6:15 5:50 6:00 4:20 6:20 6:40 13:50 R21 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 711 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 72. Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 100 Percent of the Affected Population Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) Scenario:

Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Region Rain Rain Rain Rain Earthquake Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 2Mile Region, 5Mile Region, and EPZ R01 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 R01 R02 6:50 7:35 6:10 6:35 6:00 6:55 7:25 6:05 6:35 6:00 6:55 8:30 15:20 R02 R03 7:00 7:45 6:15 6:50 6:00 7:05 7:40 6:05 6:40 6:00 9:25 8:35 19:55 R03 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R04 6:50 7:30 6:10 6:35 5:50 6:55 7:25 6:05 6:25 5:40 6:55 8:30 15:20 R04 R05 6:50 7:35 6:10 6:35 6:00 6:55 7:25 6:05 6:35 6:00 6:55 8:30 15:20 R05 R06 5:00 5:25 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:05 5:25 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:15 R06 R07 5:00 5:25 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:05 5:25 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:15 R07 R08 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 R08 R09 6:50 7:30 6:10 6:35 5:50 6:55 7:25 6:05 6:25 5:40 6:55 8:30 15:20 R09 2Mile Region and Keyhole to EPZ Boundary R10 7:00 7:50 6:15 6:50 5:55 7:05 7:40 6:05 6:35 5:45 9:25 8:35 19:55 R10 R11 7:00 7:50 6:15 6:50 5:55 7:05 7:40 6:05 6:35 5:45 9:25 8:35 19:55 R11 Staged Evacuation 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R12 6:55 7:30 6:20 6:45 5:35 6:55 7:30 6:05 6:30 5:30 7:00 8:25 14:55 R12 R13 7:00 7:30 6:20 6:45 6:15 6:55 7:30 6:15 6:35 6:05 7:00 8:25 14:55 R13 R14 5:05 5:40 5:10 5:20 5:10 5:05 5:25 5:15 5:20 5:10 5:15 5:20 5:15 R14 R15 5:05 5:40 5:10 5:20 5:10 5:05 5:25 5:15 5:20 5:10 5:15 5:20 5:15 R15 R16 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R16 R17 6:55 7:30 6:20 6:45 5:35 6:55 7:30 6:05 6:30 5:30 7:00 8:25 14:55 R17 R18 7:00 7:30 6:20 6:45 6:15 6:55 7:30 6:15 6:35 6:05 7:00 8:25 14:55 R18 SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions R19 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:05 5:05 R19 R20 7:00 7:45 6:20 6:55 6:15 7:05 7:45 6:15 6:40 6:15 9:45 8:45 19:55 R20 R21 7:05 7:45 7:10 7:30 6:00 7:15 7:40 7:15 7:25 6:00 9:25 8:45 20:05 R21 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 712 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 73. Time to Clear 90 Percent of the 2Mile Area within the Indicated Region Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) Scenario:

Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Region Rain Rain Rain Rain Earthquake Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 2Mile Region, 5Mile Region, and EPZ R01 1:35 1:40 1:35 1:40 2:20 1:40 1:45 1:40 1:45 2:25 1:30 1:40 3:00 R01 R02 2:05 2:15 1:30 1:35 2:05 2:10 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:05 1:30 2:25 2:55 R02 R03 2:05 2:15 1:30 1:35 2:05 2:10 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:05 1:30 2:25 2:55 R03 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R04 2:05 2:15 1:30 1:35 2:05 2:10 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:05 1:30 2:25 2:55 R04 R05 2:05 2:15 1:30 1:35 2:05 2:10 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:05 1:30 2:25 2:55 R05 R06 1:35 1:40 1:35 1:35 2:20 1:40 1:45 1:35 1:40 2:25 1:30 1:45 3:00 R06 R07 1:35 1:40 1:35 1:35 2:20 1:40 1:45 1:35 1:40 2:25 1:30 1:45 3:00 R07 R08 1:35 1:40 1:35 1:40 2:20 1:40 1:45 1:40 1:45 2:25 1:30 1:40 3:00 R08 R09 2:05 2:15 1:30 1:35 2:05 2:10 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:05 1:30 2:25 2:55 R09 Staged Evacuation 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R12 2:05 2:15 1:50 1:50 2:20 2:10 2:20 1:55 1:55 2:20 1:50 2:20 2:55 R12 R13 2:05 2:15 1:50 1:50 2:20 2:10 2:20 1:55 1:55 2:20 1:50 2:20 2:55 R13 R14 1:40 1:40 1:40 1:45 2:15 1:45 1:45 1:40 1:45 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:55 R14 R15 1:40 1:40 1:40 1:45 2:15 1:45 1:45 1:40 1:45 2:20 1:35 1:40 2:55 R15 R16 1:40 1:40 1:40 1:45 2:20 1:45 1:45 1:45 1:45 2:20 1:35 1:40 3:00 R16 R17 2:05 2:15 1:50 1:50 2:20 2:10 2:20 1:55 1:55 2:20 1:50 2:20 2:55 R17 R18 2:05 2:15 1:50 1:50 2:20 2:10 2:20 1:55 1:55 2:20 1:50 2:20 2:55 R18 SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions R20 2:05 2:15 1:50 1:50 2:15 2:10 2:20 1:50 1:55 2:20 1:50 2:20 2:55 R20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 713 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 74. Time to Clear 100 Percent of the 2Mile Area within the Indicated Region Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) Scenario:

Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Region Rain Rain Rain Rain Earthquake Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 2Mile Region, 5Mile Region, and EPZ R01 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 R01 R02 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R02 R03 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R03 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R04 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R04 R05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R05 R06 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R06 R07 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R07 R08 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 R08 R09 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R09 Staged Evacuation 2Mile Region and Keyhole to 5 Miles R12 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R12 R13 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R13 R14 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R14 R15 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R15 R16 5:00 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R16 R17 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R17 R18 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R18 SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions R20 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:05 5:05 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 R20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 714 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 75. Time to Clear 90 Percent of the 5Mile Area within the Indicated Region Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)

Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Rain Rain Rain Rain Earthquake Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 5Mile Region, and EPZ R02 5:10 5:45 4:35 5:00 4:25 5:15 5:45 4:30 4:55 4:20 5:10 6:20 11:35 R03 5:20 5:55 4:35 5:05 4:30 5:20 5:55 4:30 5:00 4:25 5:30 6:30 15:10 SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions R21 5:15 5:50 4:35 5:05 4:30 5:20 5:50 4:35 5:00 4:25 5:15 6:30 15:30 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 715 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 76. Time to Clear 100 Percent of the 5Mile Area within the Indicated Region Summer Summer Summer Winter Winter Winter Summer Summer Summer Midweek Midweek Midweek Weekend Midweek Weekend Weekend Midweek Midweek Weekend Weekend Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)

Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Evening Midday Midday Midday Region Good Good Good Good Good Good Special Roadway Rain Rain Rain Rain Earthquake Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Weather Event Impact Entire 5Mile Region, and EPZ R02 6:50 7:35 6:10 6:35 6:00 6:55 7:25 6:05 6:35 6:00 6:55 8:30 15:20 R03 7:00 7:40 6:10 6:45 6:00 7:05 7:35 6:00 6:30 6:00 7:15 8:40 19:45 SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions R21 6:55 7:40 6:10 6:40 6:00 7:00 7:35 6:00 6:30 6:00 7:05 8:45 19:55 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 716 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 77. Description of Evacuation Regions Description PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R01 2Mile Radius 2Mile Radius x R02 5Mile Radius 5Mile Radius x x x x R03 Full EPZ Full EPZ x x x x x Evacuate 2Mile Radius and Downwind to 5 Miles Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R04 NW, NNW, N P,Q,R,A,B x x R05 NNE x x x R06 NE, ENE, E, ESE C,D,E,F,G x x R07 SE x x x R08 SSE, S, SSW, SW, WSW, W H,J,K,L,M,N x x R09 WNW x x x Evacuate 5Mile Radius and Downwind to 10 Miles Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 N/A WNW, NW, NNW, N Refer to R03 NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, SE, SSE, S, N/A Refer to R02 SSW, SW, WSW, W Evacuate 2Mile Radius and Downwind to 10 Miles Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R10 NW, NNW, N P,Q,R,A,B x x x N/A NNE Refer to R05 N/A NE, ENE, E, ESE C,D,E,F,G Refer to R06 N/A SE, SSE Refer to R07 N/A S, SSW, SW, WSW, W H,J,K,L,M,N Refer to R08 R11 WNW x x x x Staged Evacuation 2Mile Radius Evacuates, then Evacuate Downwind to 5 Miles Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R12 NW, NNW, N P,Q,R,A,B x x R13 NNE x x x R14 NE, ENE, E, ESE C,D,E,F,G x x R15 SE x x x R16 SSE, S, SSW, SW, WSW, W H,J,K,L,M,N x x R17 WNW x x x R18 5Mile Region x x x x SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions PAZ Region Description 1 2 3 4 5 R19 Evacuate PAZ 5 Only x R20 Evacuate 1,Shelter then Evacuate 2, 3, 4, 5 x x x x x R21 Evacuate 1, 2, 3, 4, Shelter then Evacuate 5 x x x x x PAZ(s) ShelterinPlace until 90% ETE for PAZ(s) ShelterinPlace PAZ(s) Evacuate Unstaged Region, then Evacuate San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 717 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 71. Voluntary Evacuation Methodology San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 718 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 72. SONGS Shadow Region San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 719 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 73. Congestion Patterns at 30 Minutes after the Advisory to Evacuate San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 720 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 74. Congestion Patterns at 1 Hour after the Advisory to Evacuate San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 721 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 75. Congestion Patterns at 2 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 722 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 76. Congestion Patterns at 3 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 723 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 77. Congestion Patterns at 4 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 724 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 78. Congestion Patterns at 6 Hours after the Advisory to Evacuate San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 725 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 79. Congestion Patterns at 6 Hours, 20 Minutes after the Advisory to Evacuate San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 726 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 1) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

140 120 Vehicles Evacuating 100 80 (Thousands) 60 40 20 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 710. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 1 for Region R03 Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

140 120 Vehicles Evacuating 100 80 (Thousands) 60 40 20 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 711. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 2 for Region R03 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 727 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 3) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

120 100 Vehicles Evacuating 80 60 (Thousands) 40 20 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 712. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 3 for Region R03 Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

140 120 Vehicles Evacuating 100 80 (Thousands) 60 40 20 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 713. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 4 for Region R03 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 728 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 5) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

140 120 Vehicles Evacuating 100 80 (Thousands) 60 40 20 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 714. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 5 for Region R03 Evacuation Time Estimates Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 6) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

140 120 Vehicles Evacuating 100 80 (Thousands) 60 40 20 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 715. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 6 for Region R03 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 729 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

140 120 Vehicles Evacuating 100 80 (Thousands) 60 40 20 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 716. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 7 for Region R03 Evacuation Time Estimates Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 8) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

140 120 Vehicles Evacuating 100 80 (Thousands) 60 40 20 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 717. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 8 for Region R03 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 730 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 9) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

140 120 Vehicles Evacuating 100 80 (Thousands) 60 40 20 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 718. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 9 for Region R03 Evacuation Time Estimates Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 10) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

140 120 Vehicles Evacuating 100 80 (Thousands) 60 40 20 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 719. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 10 for Region R03 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 731 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good, Special Event (Scenario 11) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

200 180 160 Vehicles Evacuating 140 120 100 (Thousands) 80 60 40 20 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 720. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 11 for Region R03 Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good, Roadway Impact (Scenario 12) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

140 120 Vehicles Evacuating 100 80 (Thousands) 60 40 20 0

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 721. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 12 for Region R03 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 732 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Evacuation Time Estimates Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good, Earthquake (Scenario 13) 2Mile Region 5Mile Region Entire EPZ 90% 100%

140 120 Vehicles Evacuating 100 80 (Thousands) 60 40 20 0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Elapsed Time After Evacuation Recommendation (min)

Figure 722. Evacuation Time Estimates Scenario 13 for Region R03 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 733 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

8 TRANSITDEPENDENT AND SPECIAL FACILITY EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATES This section details the analyses applied and the results obtained in the form of evacuation time estimates for transit vehicles. The demand for transit service reflects the needs of three population groups: (1) residents with no vehicles available; (2) residents of special facilities such as schools, medical facilities; and (3) registered people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs.

These transit vehicles mix with the general evacuation traffic that is comprised mostly of passenger cars (pcs). The presence of each transit vehicle in the evacuating traffic stream is represented within the modeling paradigm described in Appendix D as equivalent to two pcs.

This equivalence factor represents the longer size and more sluggish operating characteristics of a transit vehicle, relative to those of a pc.

Transit vehicles must be mobilized in preparation for their respective evacuation missions.

Specifically:

• Bus drivers must be alerted

• They must travel to the bus depot

• They must be briefed there and assigned to a route or facility These activities consume time. Based on discussion with the offsite agencies, it is estimated that bus mobilization time will average approximately 90 minutes extending from the Advisory to Evacuate, to the time when buses first arrive at the facility to be evacuated.

During this mobilization period, other mobilization activities are taking place. One of these is the action taken by parents, neighbors, relatives and friends to pick up children from school prior to the arrival of buses, so that they may join their families. Virtually all studies of evacuations have concluded that this bonding process of uniting families is universally prevalent during emergencies and should be anticipated in the planning process. The current public information disseminated to residents of the SONGS EPZ indicates that schoolchildren may be evacuated to reception centers at emergency action levels of Site Area Emergency or higher. As discussed in Section 2, this study assumes a fast breaking general emergency.

Therefore, children are evacuated to reception centers. Picking up children at school could add to traffic congestion at the schools, delaying the departure of the buses evacuating schoolchildren, which may have to return in a subsequent wave to the EPZ to evacuate the transitdependent population. This report provides estimates of buses under the assumption that no children will be picked up by their parents (in accordance with NUREG/CR7002), to present an upper bound estimate of buses required. It is assumed that children at daycare centers are picked up by parents or guardians and that the time to perform this activity is included in the trip generation times discussed in Section 5.

The procedure for computing transitdependent ETE is to:

• Estimate demand for transit service

• Estimate time to perform all transit functions San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 81 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

• Estimate route travel times to the EPZ boundary and to the reception centers 8.1 Transit Dependent People Demand Estimate The telephone survey (see Appendix F) results were used to estimate the portion of the population requiring transit service:

• Those persons in households that do not have a vehicle available.

• Those persons in households that do have vehicle(s) that would not be available at the time the evacuation is advised.

In the latter group, the vehicle(s) may be used by a commuter(s) who does not return (or is not expected to return) home to evacuate the household.

Table 81 presents estimates of transitdependent people. Note:

• Estimates of persons requiring transit vehicles include schoolchildren. For those evacuation scenarios where children are at school when an evacuation is ordered, separate transportation is provided for the schoolchildren. The actual need for transit vehicles by residents is thereby less than the given estimates. However, estimates of transit vehicles are not reduced when schools are in session.

• It is reasonable and appropriate to consider that many transitdependent persons will evacuate by ridesharing with neighbors, friends or family. For example, nearly 80 percent of those who evacuated from Mississauga, Ontario who did not use their own cars, shared a ride with neighbors or friends. Other documents report that approximately 70 percent of transit dependent persons were evacuated via ride sharing. We will adopt a conservative estimate that 50 percent of transit dependent persons will ride share, in accordance with NUREG/CR7002.

The estimated number of bus trips needed to service transitdependent persons is based on an estimate of average bus occupancy of 30 persons at the conclusion of the bus run. Transit vehicle seating capacities typically equal or exceed 60 children on average (roughly equivalent to 40 adults). If transit vehicle evacuees are two thirds adults and one third children, then the number of adult seats taken by 30 persons is 20 + (2/3 x10) = 27. On this basis, the average load factor anticipated is (27/40) x 100 = 68 percent. Thus, if the actual demand for service exceeds the estimates of Table 81 by 50 percent, the demand for service can still be accommodated by the available bus seating capacity.

2 20 10 40 1.5 1.00 3

Table 81 indicates that transportation must be provided for 4,514 people. Therefore, a total of 151 bus runs are required to transport this population to reception centers.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 82 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

To illustrate this estimation procedure, we calculate the number of persons, P, requiring public transit or rideshare, and the number of buses, B, required for the SONGS EPZ:

Where, A = Percent of households with commuters C = Percent of households who will not await the return of a commuter 58,311 0.024 1.67 0.262 1.72 1 0.57 0.64 0.460 2.75 2 0.57 0.64 58,311 0.15481 9,027 0.5 30 151 These calculations are explained as follows:

• All members (1.67 avg.) of households (HH) with no vehicles (2.4%) will evacuate by public transit or rideshare. The term 58,311 (number of households) x 0.024 x 1.67, accounts for these people.

• The members of HH with 1 vehicle away (26.2%), who are at home, equal (1.721).

The number of HH where the commuter will not return home is equal to (58,311 x 0.262 x 0.57 x 0.64), as 57% of EPZ households have a commuter, 64% of which would not return home in the event of an emergency. The number of persons who will evacuate by public transit or rideshare is equal to the product of these two terms.

• The members of HH with 2 vehicles that are away (46.0%), who are at home, equal (2.75 - 2). The number of HH where neither commuter will return home is equal to 58,311 x 0.460 x (0.57 x 0.64)2. The number of persons who will evacuate by public transit or rideshare is equal to the product of these two terms (the last term is squared to represent the probability that neither commuter will return).

• Households with 3 or more vehicles are assumed to have no need for transit vehicles.

• The total number of persons requiring public transit is the sum of such people in HH with no vehicles, or with 1 or 2 vehicles that are away from home.

The estimate of transitdependent population in Table 81 far exceeds the number of registered transitdependent persons in the EPZ as provided by Orange County (discussed below in Section 8.5). This is consistent with the findings of NUREG/CR6953, Volume 2, in that a large majority of the transitdependent population within the EPZs of U.S. nuclear plants does not register with their local emergency response agency.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 83 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

8.2 School Population - Transit Demand Table 82 presents the school population and transportation requirements for the direct evacuation of all schools within the EPZ for the 20112012 school year. This information was provided by the Capistrano Unified School District, as well as Orange County. Private schools and child care facilities are assumed to be transit dependent. Private schools and child care facilities may rely on parent pick up, private transportation resources, and/or transportation assembly points to relocate children and staff. The column in Table 82 entitled Buses Required specifies the number of buses required for each school under the following set of assumptions and estimates:

• No students will be picked up by their parents prior to the arrival of the buses.

• While many high school students commute to school using private automobiles (as discussed in Section 2.4 of NUREG/CR7002), the estimate of buses required for school evacuation do not consider the use of these private vehicles.

• Bus capacity, expressed in students per bus, is set to 70 for primary schools and 50 for middle and high schools.

• Those staff members who do not accompany the students will evacuate in their private vehicles.

• No allowance is made for student absenteeism, typically 3 percent daily.

It is recommended that the municipalities in the EPZ introduce procedures whereby the schools are contacted prior to the dispatch of buses from the depot, to ascertain the current estimate of students to be evacuated. In this way, the number of buses dispatched to the schools will reflect the actual number needed. The need for buses would be reduced by any high school students who have evacuated using private automobiles (if permitted by school authorities).

Those buses originally allocated to evacuate schoolchildren that are not needed due to children being picked up by their parents, can be gainfully assigned to service other facilities or those persons who do not have access to private vehicles or to ridesharing.

Table 83 presents a list of the reception centers for each school in the EPZ. Students will be transported to these reception centers where they will be subsequently retrieved by their respective families.

8.3 Medical Facility Demand Table 84 presents the census of medical facilities in the EPZ. 913 people have been identified as living in, or being treated in, these facilities. The capacity and current census for each facility were provided by Orange County and the individual municipalities within the EPZ. This data also includes the number of ambulatory, wheelchairbound and bedridden patients for a portion of these facilities which provided data. The average distribution of ambulatory, wheelchair bound and bedridden patients for those provided were applied to the remaining facilities which did not provide detailed data.

The transportation requirements for the medical facility population are also presented in Table

84. The number of ambulance runs is determined by assuming that 2 patients can be San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 84 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

accommodated per ambulance trip; the number of bus runs estimated assumes 30 ambulatory patients per trip and 3 wheelchair bound persons per trip.

8.4 Evacuation Time Estimates for Transit Dependent People EPZ bus resources are assigned to evacuating schoolchildren (if school is in session at the time of the ATE) as the first priority in the event of an emergency. In the event that the allocation of buses dispatched from the depots to the various facilities and to the bus routes is somewhat inefficient, or if there is a shortfall of available drivers, then there may be a need for some buses to return to the EPZ from the reception center after completing their first evacuation trip, to complete a second wave of providing transport service to evacuees. For this reason, the ETE for the transitdependent population will be calculated for both a one wave transit evacuation and for two waves. Of course, if the impacted Evacuation Region is other than R03 (the entire EPZ), then there will likely be ample transit resources relative to demand in the impacted Region and this discussion of a second wave would likely not apply.

When school evacuation needs are satisfied, subsequent assignments of buses to service the transitdependent population should be sensitive to their mobilization time. Clearly, the buses should be dispatched after people have completed their mobilization activities and are in a position to board the buses when they arrive at the pickup points.

Evacuation Time Estimates for transit trips were developed using both good weather and rain.

Figure 81 presents the chronology of events relevant to transit operations. The elapsed time for each activity will now be discussed with reference to Figure 81.

Activity: Mobilize Drivers (ABC)

Mobilization is the elapsed time from the Advisory to Evacuate until the time the buses arrive at the facility to be evacuated. Based on discussions with the offsite agencies, school bus drivers would require 90 minutes to be contacted, to travel to the depot, be briefed, and to travel to the transitdependent facilities. Mobilization time is slightly longer in adverse weather - 100 minutes when raining.

Activity: Board Passengers (CD)

Based on discussions with offsite agencies, a loading time of 15 minutes (20 minutes for rain) for school buses is used.

For multiple stops along a pickup route (transitdependent bus routes) estimation of travel time must allow for the delay associated with stopping and starting at each pickup point. The time, t, required for a bus to decelerate at a rate, a, expressed in ft/sec/sec, from a speed, v, expressed in ft/sec, to a stop, is t = v/a. Assuming the same acceleration rate and final speed following the stop yields a total time, T, to service boarding passengers:

2 ,

Where B = Dwell time to service passengers. The total distance, s in feet, travelled during the deceleration and acceleration activities is: s = v2/a. If the bus had not stopped to service San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 85 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

passengers, but had continued to travel at speed, v, then its travel time over the distance, s, would be: s/v = v/a. Then the total delay (i.e. pickup time, P) to service passengers is:

Assigning reasonable estimates:

• B = 50 seconds: a generous value for a single passenger, carrying personal items, to board per stop

• v = 25 mph = 37 ft/sec

• a = 4 ft/sec/sec, a moderate average rate Then, P 1 minute per stop. Allowing 30 minutes pickup time per bus run implies 30 stops per run, for good weather. It is assumed that bus acceleration and speed will be less in rain; total loading time is 40 minutes per bus in rain.

Activity: Travel to EPZ Boundary (DE)

School Evacuation Transportation resources available were provided by Orange County and MCB and are summarized in Table 85. Also included in the table are the number of buses needed to evacuate schools, medical facilities, transitdependent population, and registered people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs (discussed below in Section 8.5). These numbers indicate there are sufficient resources available to evacuate everyone in a single wave.

The buses servicing the schools are ready to begin their evacuation trips at 105 minutes after the advisory to evacuate - 90 minutes mobilization time plus 15 minutes loading time - in good weather. The UNITES software discussed in Section 1.3 was used to define bus routes along the most likely path from a school being evacuated to the EPZ boundary, traveling toward the appropriate school reception center. This is done in UNITES by interactively selecting the series of nodes from the school to the EPZ boundary. Each bus route is given an identification number and is written to the DYNEV II input stream. DYNEV computes the route length and outputs the average speed for each 5 minute interval, for each bus route. The specified bus routes are documented in Table 86 (refer to the maps of the linknode analysis network in Appendix K for node locations). Data provided by DYNEV during the appropriate timeframe depending on the mobilization and loading times (i.e., 100 to 105 minutes after the advisory to evacuate for good weather) were used to compute the average speed for each route, as follows:

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 86 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

60 .

1 .

. 60 .

. . 1 .

The average speed computed (using this methodology) for the buses servicing each of the schools in the EPZ is shown in Table 87 and Table 88 for school evacuation, and in Table 810 and Table 811 for the transit vehicles evacuating transitdependent persons, which are discussed later. The travel time to the EPZ boundary was computed for each bus using the computed average speed and the distance to the EPZ boundary along the most likely route out of the EPZ. The travel time from the EPZ boundary to the reception center was computed assuming an average speed of 45 mph and 40 mph for good weather and rain, respectively.

Speeds were reduced in Table 87 and Table 88 and in Table 810 and Table 811 to 55 mph (50 mph for rain - 10% decrease, rounded to the nearest 5 mph) for those calculated bus speeds which exceed 55 mph (50 mph for rain), as the school bus speed limit for state routes in California is 55 mph.

Table 87 (good weather) and Table 88 (rain) present the following evacuation time estimates (rounded up to the nearest 5 minutes) for schools in the EPZ: (1) The elapsed time from the Advisory to Evacuate until the bus exits the EPZ; and (2) The elapsed time until the bus reaches the reception center. The evacuation time out of the EPZ can be computed as the sum of times associated with Activities ABC, CD, and DE (For example: 90 min. + 15 + 76 = 3:05 for Bernice Ayer Middle School, with good weather). The evacuation time to the reception center is determined by adding the time associated with Activity EF (discussed below), to this EPZ evacuation time. The average ETE for schools is considerably less than the 90th percentile general population ETE for an evacuation of the entire EPZ.

Evacuation of TransitDependent Population The buses dispatched from the depots to service the transitdependent evacuees will be scheduled so that they arrive at their respective routes after their passengers have completed their mobilization. As shown in Figure 54 (Residents with no Commuters), approximately 90 percent of the evacuees will complete their mobilization when the buses will begin their routes, 105 minutes after the Advisory to Evacuate. The start of service on these routes is separated by 10 minute headways, as shown in Table 810 and Table 811. The use of bus headways ensures that those people who take longer to mobilize will be picked up. Mobilization time is 10 minutes longer in rain to account for slower travel speeds and reduced roadway capacity.

Those buses servicing the transitdependent evacuees will first travel along their pickup routes, then proceed out of the EPZ. Transportation Assembly Points (TAPs) are established San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 87 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

throughout the EPZ. Evacuees are made aware of these locations via the public information system and emergency broadcasts. The county emergency plans do not define bus routes to service these TAPs. The 15 bus routes shown graphically in Figure 82 through Figure 84 and described in Table 89 were designed as part of this study to service the TAPs outlined in the municipal emergency plans. It is assumed that residents will walk to and congregate at these predesignated TAPs, and that they can arrive within the 105 minute bus mobilization time (good weather).

As previously discussed, a pickup time of 30 minutes (good weather) is estimated for 30 individual stops to pick up passengers, with an average of one minute of delay associated with each stop. A longer pickup time of 40 minutes is used for rain.

The travel distance along the respective pickup routes within the EPZ is estimated using the UNITES software. Bus travel times within the EPZ are computed using average speeds computed by DYNEV, using the aforementioned methodology that was used for school evacuation.

Table 810 and Table 811 present the transitdependent population evacuation time estimates for each bus route calculated using the above procedures for good weather and rain.

For example, the ETE for buses 1 and 2 servicing Route 40 is computed as 105 + 27 + 30 = 2:45 for good weather (rounded up to nearest 5 minutes). Here, 27 minutes is the time to travel 20.9 miles at 46.4 mph, the average speed output by the model for this route starting at 105 minutes. The ETE for a second wave (discussed below) is presented in the event there is a shortfall of available buses or bus drivers, as previously discussed.

Activity: Travel to Reception Centers (EF)

The distances from the EPZ boundary to the reception centers are measured using GIS software along the most likely route from the EPZ exit point to the reception center. The reception centers are mapped in Figure 101. For a onewave evacuation, this travel time outside the EPZ does not contribute to the ETE. For a twowave evacuation, the ETE for buses must be considered separately, since it could exceed the ETE for the general public. Assumed bus speeds of 45 mph for good weather and 40 mph for rain will be applied for this activity for buses servicing the transitdependent population.

Activity: Passengers Leave Bus (FG)

A bus can empty within 5 minutes. The driver takes a 10 minute break.

Activity: Bus Returns to Route for Second Wave Evacuation (GC)

The buses assigned to return to the EPZ to perform a second wave evacuation of transit dependent evacuees will be those that have already evacuated transitdependent people who mobilized more quickly. The first wave of transitdependent people depart the bus, and the bus then returns to the EPZ, travels to its route and proceeds to pick up more transit dependent evacuees along the route. The travel time back to the EPZ is equal to the travel time to the reception center.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 88 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

The secondwave ETE for buses 1 and 2 servicing Route 40 is computed as follows for good weather:

• Bus arrives at reception center at 2:52 in good weather (2:45 to exit EPZ + 7 minute travel time to reception center).

• Bus discharges passengers (5 minutes) and driver takes a 10minute rest: 15 minutes.

• Bus returns to EPZ and completes second route: 34 minutes (travel time to reception center + travel time to the start of the route) + 23 minutes (20.9 miles @ 55.0 mph)

= 57 minutes

• Bus completes pickups along route: 30 minutes.

• Bus exits EPZ at time 2:45 + 0:07+ 0:15 + 0:57 + 0:30 = 4:35 (rounded to nearest 5 minutes) after the Advisory to Evacuate.

The ETE for the completion of the second wave for all transitdependent bus routes are provided in Table 810 and Table 811. The average one wave ETE for the transitdependent population is considerably less than the 90th percentile general population ETE for an evacuation of the entire EPZ. The average ETE for a twowave evacuation of transitdependent people exceeds the ETE for the general population at the 90th percentile for an evacuation of the entire EPZ.

The relocation of transitdependent evacuees from the reception centers to congregate care centers, if Orange County and MCB decide to do so, is not considered in this study.

Evacuation of Medical Facilities The evacuation of these facilities is similar to school evacuation except:

• Buses are assigned on the basis of 30 ambulatory and 3 wheelchair bound patients to allow for staff to accompany the patients. Ambulances can accommodate 2 patients.

• Loading times of 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 15 minutes per patient are assumed for ambulatory patients, wheelchair bound patients, and bedridden patients, respectively.

Table 84 indicates that 89 bus runs and 55 ambulance runs are needed to service all of the medical facilities in the EPZ. According to Table 85, MCB, the municipalities and Orange County can collectively provide 1,082 buses, 36 vans, 33 wheelchair accessible vans and 539 ambulances.

Thus, there are sufficient resources to evacuate the ambulatory, wheelchair bound and bedridden persons from the medical facilities in a single wave.

As is done for the schools, it is estimated that mobilization time averages 90 minutes. Specially trained medical support staff (working their regular shift) will be on site to assist in the evacuation of patients. Additional staff (if needed) could be mobilized over this same 90 minute timeframe.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 89 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 812 and Table 813 summarize the ETE for medical facilities within the EPZ for good weather and rain. Average speeds output by the model for Scenario 6 (Scenario 7 for rain)

Region 3, capped at 55 mph (50 mph for rain), are used to compute travel time to EPZ boundary. The travel time to the EPZ boundary is computed by dividing the distance to the EPZ boundary by the average travel speed. The ETE is the sum of the mobilization time, total passenger loading time, and travel time out of the EPZ. Concurrent loading on multiple buses, wheelchair buses/vans, and ambulances at capacity is assumed such that the maximum loading times for buses and ambulances are 45 and 30 minutes, respectively. All ETE are rounded to the nearest 5 minutes. For example, the calculation of ETE for the Saddleback Memorial Medical Center with 43 ambulatory and 29 wheelchair bound residents during good weather is:

ETE: 90 + 45 + 54 = 189 min. or 3:10 rounded to the nearest 5 minutes.

The average ETE for medical facilities is considerably less than the 90th percentile general population ETE for an evacuation of the entire EPZ.

It is assumed that medical facility population is directly evacuated to appropriate host medical facilities. Relocation of this population to permanent facilities and/or passing through the reception center before arriving at the host facility are not considered in this analysis.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 810 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

8.5 Registered People with Disabilities and Others with Access and Functional Needs The county emergency management agencies have a combined registration for transit dependents and people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs. Based on data provided by Orange County, there are an estimated 259 registered people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs within EPZ who require transportation assistance to evacuate. The 259 people consist of 129 ambulatory persons, 130 wheelchairbound persons and 0 bedridden persons. All 259 people reside in the Orange County portion of the EPZ.

ETE for Registered People with Disabilities and Others with Access and Functional Needs Table 814 summarizes the ETE for registered people with disabilities and others with access and functional needs. The table is categorized by type of vehicle required and then broken down by weather condition. The table takes into consideration the deployment of multiple vehicles to reduce the number of stops per vehicle. It is conservatively assumed that ambulatory and wheelchair bound special needs households are spaced 3 miles apart. Bus speeds approximate 20 mph between households (10% slower in rain). Mobilization times of 90 minutes were used (100 minutes for rain). The last HH is assumed to be 5 miles from the EPZ boundary, and the networkwide average speed, capped at 55 mph (50 mph for rain), after the last pickup is used to compute travel time. ETE is computed by summing mobilization time, loading time at first household, travel to subsequent households, loading time at subsequent households, and travel time to EPZ boundary. All ETE are rounded to the nearest 5 minutes.

For example, assuming no more than one special needs person per HH implies that 259 households need to be serviced. If 44 buses are deployed to service these special needs HH, then each would require about 6 stops. The following outlines the ETE calculations:

1. Assume 44 buses are deployed, each with about 6 stops, to service a total of 259 HH.

2. The ETE is calculated as follows:

a. Buses arrive at the first pickup location: 90 minutes

b. Load HH members at first pickup: 5 minutes

c. Travel to subsequent pickup locations: 5 @ 9 minutes = 45 minutes

d. Load HH members at subsequent pickup locations: 5 @ 5 minutes = 25 minutes

e. Travel to EPZ boundary: 23 minutes (5 miles @ 13.2 mph).

ETE: 90 + 5 + 45 + 25 + 23 = 3:10 rounded to the nearest 5 minutes San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 811 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

(Subsequent Wave)

A B C D E F G Time Event A Advisory to Evacuate B Bus Dispatched from Depot C Bus Arrives at Facility/Pickup Route D Bus Departs for Reception Center E Bus Exits Region F Bus Arrives at Reception Center/Host Facility G Bus Available for Second Wave Evacuation Service Activity AB Driver Mobilization BC Travel to Facility or to Pickup Route CD Passengers Board the Bus DE Bus Travels Towards Region Boundary EF Bus Travels Towards Reception Center Outside the EPZ FG Passengers Leave Bus; Driver Takes a Break Figure 81. Chronology of Transit Evacuation Operations San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 812 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 82. TransitDependent Bus Routes in PAZ 4 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 813 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 83. TransitDependent Bus Routes in PAZ 5 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 814 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 84. TransitDependent Bus Routes in PAZs 1 and 3 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 815 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 81. TransitDependent Population Estimates Survey Average Survey Percent 2010 HH Size Survey Percent HH Survey Percent HH Total People Population EPZ with Indicated Estimated with Indicated No. of Percent HH with Non People Estimated Requiring Requiring Popul No. of Vehicles No. of Vehicles with Returning Requiring Ridesharing Public Public ation 0 1 2 Households 0 1 2 Commuters Commuters Transport Percentage Transit Transit 153,357 1.67 1.72 2.75 58,311 2.4% 26.2% 46.0% 57% 64% 9,027 50% 4,514 2.9%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 816 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 82. School Population Demand Estimates Local Buses PAZ School/Daycare Name Enrollment Required Private Schools 4 Our Lady of Fatima School 285 5 4 Our Savior's Lutheran School 260 5 4 St. Michael's Christian Academy 155 3 5 Broderick Montessori School 70 2 5 Capistrano Home School 20 1 5 Capistrano Valley Christian Schools 492 9 5 Capo Beach Calvary 225 4 5 Jserra Catholic High School 925 19 5 Mission Parish School 320 6 5 Monarch Bay Montessori Academy 120 2 5 Rancho Capistrano School 66 2 5 Saddleback Valley Christian School 590 10 5 San Juan Montessori 45 1 5 South Shores Christian School 56 1 5 St Edward School 750 13 5 St. Margaret's Episcopal School 1222 21 5 Stonebridge Day School 45 1 5 Stoneybrooke Christian Schools 443 8 Public Schools 1 San Onofre School 758 11 1 San Onofre Youth Center 114 3 4 Bernice Ayer Middle School 885 18 4 Clarence Lobo Elementary School 463 7 4 Concordia Elementary School 646 10 4 Las Palmas Elementary School 751 11 4 Marblehead Elementary School 577 9 4 San Clemente High School 2982 60 4 Shorecliffs Middle School 1061 22 4 Truman Benedict Elementary School 694 10 4 Vista Del Mar Elementary School 1137 17 4 Vista Del Mar Middle School 522 11 5 Ambuehl Elementary School 558 8 5 Dana Hills High School 2788 56 5 Del Obispo Elementary School 467 7 5 Kinoshita Elementary School 630 9 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 817 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Local Buses PAZ School/Daycare Name Enrollment Required 5 Marco Forster Middle School 1444 29 5 Palisades Elementary School 510 8 5 Richard Henry Dana Elementary School 376 6 Richard Henry Dana Exceptional Needs 5 School 48 1 5 San Juan Elementary School 665 10 5 San Juan Hills High School 655 14 5 Serra High School 175 4 School Subtotal: 24,995 454 Preschools/Daycares 1 San Onofre Child Development Center 190 3 4 Bright Horizons at San Clemente 144 3 4 Clarence Lobo 100 2 4 Concordia Elementary School 24 1 4 Kindercare Learning Center 128 2 4 La Cristianita Preschool 85 2 4 Las Palmas State Preschool 48 1 4 Marblehead Elementary School 16 1 4 Our Savior's Lutheran Preschool 60 1 4 Palisades United Methodist Preschool 80 2 4 San Clemente Presbyterian Preschool 79 2 4 San Clemente Preschool 75 2 4 Serra Preschool 24 1 4 St. Michaels Infant/Toddler Center 58 1 4 Talega Life Church Preschool 70 1 5 Broderick Montessori School, Inc 30 1 5 Capistrano Beach Cities YMCADel Obispo 90 2 5 Capo Beach Calvary 50 1 5 Capo Valley Head Start 60 1 5 Childbridge Preschool 48 1 5 Dana Montessori School 37 1 5 Dana Point Montessori 36 1 5 Evelyn Lobo Villegas Head Start 40 1 5 Gloria Dei Lutheran Preschool 54 1 5 Kinoshita Elementary School 24 1 5 Little Minds Montessori Academy 75 2 5 Mission Parish School 25 1 5 Monarch Bay Montessori Academy 90 2 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 818 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Local Buses PAZ School/Daycare Name Enrollment Required 5 Ohana Preschool 45 1 5 Palisades Elementary School 24 1 5 Richard Henry Dana Elementary School 24 1 5 San Juan Montessori 45 1 5 South Shores Christian Preschool 86 2 5 St Edward's Catholic Preschool 72 2 5 St. Margaret's Episcopal School 90 2 5 Stoneybrooke Christian Schools 60 1 Preschool/Daycare Subtotal: 2,286 52 TOTAL: 27,281 506 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 819 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 83. School Reception Centers School Reception & Decontamination Center San Onofre Child Development Center San Onofre School Del Mar Area Fitness Center (MCB)

San Onofre Youth Center Bernice Ayer Middle School Bright Horizons at San Clemente Clarence Lobo Clarence Lobo Elementary School Concordia Elementary School Kindercare Learning Center La Cristianita Preschool Las Palmas Elementary School Las Palmas State Preschool Marblehead Elementary School Our Lady of Fatima School Our Savior's Lutheran Preschool Our Savior's Lutheran School Palisades United Methodist Preschool San Clemente High School San Clemente Presbyterian Preschool San Clemente Preschool Serra Preschool Orange County Fairgrounds Shorecliffs Middle School St. Michaels Infant/Toddler Center St. Michael's Christian Academy Talega Life Church Preschool Truman Benedict Elementary School Vista Del Mar Elementary School Vista Del Mar Middle School Ambuehl Elementary School Broderick Montessori School Broderick Montessori School, Inc Capistrano Beach Cities YMCADel Obispo Capistrano Home School Capistrano Valley Christian Schools Capo Beach Calvary Capo Valley Head Start Childbridge Preschool San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 820 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

School Reception & Decontamination Center Dana Hills High School Dana Montessori School Dana Point Montessori Del Obispo Elementary School Evelyn Lobo Villegas Head Start Gloria Dei Lutheran Preschool Jserra Catholic High School Kinoshita Elementary School Little Minds Montessori Academy Marco Forster Middle School Mission Parish School Monarch Bay Montessori Academy Ohana Preschool Palisades Elementary School Rancho Capistrano School Orange County Fairgrounds Richard Henry Dana Elementary School Richard Henry Dana Exceptional Needs School Saddleback Valley Christian School San Juan Elementary School San Juan Hills High School San Juan Montessori Serra High School South Shores Christian Preschool South Shores Christian School St Edward School St Edward's Catholic Preschool St. Margaret's Episcopal School Stonebridge Day School Stoneybrooke Christian Schools San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 821 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 84. Medical Facility Transit Demand Wheel Cap Current Ambu chair Bed Bus PAZ Facility Name Municipality acity Census latory Bound ridden Runs Ambulance Orange County Medical Facilities 4 Accent on Seniors San Clemente 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 4 Calle Sonora Place San Clemente 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 4 Camino Hills Care Home 2 San Clemente 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 4 Camino Hills of San Clemente San Clemente 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 4 Casa Paraiso Arlena San Clemente 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 4 Chateau by the Golf Course San Clemente 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 4 Leriza's Guest Home San Clemente 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 4 Malash Gardens San Clemente 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 4 Mirabel by the Sea V San Clemente 5 5 2 2 1 1 1 4 Rosehaven I San Clemente 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 4 Rosehaven III San Clemente 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 4 Saddleback Memorial Medical Center San Clemente 86 86 43 29 14 10 7 4 San Clemente Villas by the Sea San Clemente 190 168 126 28 14 10 7 4 Seaview Care Home San Clemente 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 4 Talega Terrace San Juan Capistrano 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 4 Tender Touch Eldercare Dana Point 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 5 Aegis of Dana Point San Juan Capistrano 76 76 38 25 13 9 7 5 Atria San Juan San Juan Capistrano 140 79 75 4 0 3 0 5 Bayside Terrace Capistrano Beach 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 5 Casa De Amma Dana Point 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 5 Del Obispo Terrace Senior Living San Juan Capistrano 95 80 70 10 0 4 0 5 Emeritus at San Juan Capistrano San Juan Capistrano 101 87 87 0 0 3 0 5 Fountains At Sea Bluffs San Juan Capistrano 88 88 44 29 15 10 8 5 Mirabel By the Sea San Juan Capistrano 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 822 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Wheel Cap Current Ambu chair Bed Bus PAZ Facility Name Municipality acity Census latory Bound ridden Runs Ambulance 5 Niguel Hills Villa I San Juan Capistrano 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 5 San Juan Capistrano South Dialysis Dana Point 18 18 9 6 3 2 2 5 Sea Bright Place Dana Point 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 5 Seaside Terrace San Juan Capistrano 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 5 Silverado Senior Living San Juan Capistrano Dana Point 96 91 51 40 0 14 0 5 Tessie's Place Loving Care Home #1 Dana Point 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 5 Tessie's Place Loving Care Home #2 San Juan Capistrano 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 5 Tessie's Place Loving Care Home #3 San Juan Capistrano 6 6 3 2 1 1 1 5 Time & Patience San Juan Capistrano 3 3 0 2 1 1 1 TOTAL: 1,030 913 611 219 83 89 55 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 823 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 85. Summary of Transportation Resources Resources Available Total Fleet Capacity Transportation WC Wheelchair Resource Buses Vans Vans Ambulances Ambulatory Bound Bedridden American Logistics Taxis and Shuttles 0 36 33 0 414 66 0 Capistrano Unified School District 156 0 0 0 6,213 312 0 OCTA 631 0 0 0 28,279 1,334 0 Veolia 253 0 0 0 3,139 1,011 0 Southwest Region Fleet Transportation (SWRFT) 42 0 0 0 1,848 0 0 Various Licensed Ambulance Services 0 0 0 539 0 0 1,078 TOTAL: 1,082 36 33 539 39,893 2,723 1,078 Resources Needed WC Wheelchair Population Group/Mobility Level Buses Vans Vans Ambulances Ambulatory Bound Bedridden Schools (Table 82): 506 0 0 0 27,254 27 0 Medical Facilities (Table 84): 89 0 0 55 611 219 83 TransitDependent Population (Table 810): 151 0 0 0 4,514 0 0 Registered People with Disabilities and others 44 0 0 0 129 130 0 with Access and Functional Needs (Section 8.5):

TOTAL TRANSPORTATION NEEDS: 790 0 0 55 32,508 376 83 1

SWRFT transportation resources used for facilities within MCB.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 824 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 86. Bus Route Descriptions Bus Route Nodes Traversed from Route Start to Number Description/Facilities Serviced EPZ Boundary Ambuehl Elementary School Jserra Catholic High School Mission Parish School Saddleback Valley Christian School San Juan Elementary School 138, 1413, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 1 Serra High School 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 St. Margaret's Episcopal School Stonebridge Day School Capo Valley Head Start Mission Parish School St. Margaret's Episcopal School Capistrano Home School Capistrano Valley Christian Schools Kinoshita Elementary School 563, 1342, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 2 San Juan Montessori 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, Evelyn Lobo Villegas Head Start 82, 1453, 83, 84 Kinoshita Elementary School San Juan Montessori Bernice Ayer Middle School 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 126, Shorecliffs Middle School 127, 1280, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 3 Truman Benedict Elementary School 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, Palisades Elementary School 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, Palisades Elementary School 84 Broderick Montessori School Capo Beach Calvary Dana Hills High School Del Obispo Elementary School Marco Forster Middle School 132, 1284, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 4 Richard Henry Dana Elementary School 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, Richard Henry Dana Exceptional Needs School 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 St Edward School Broderick Montessori School, Inc Capo Beach Calvary Richard Henry Dana Elementary School San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 825 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Bus Route Nodes Traversed from Route Start to Number Description/Facilities Serviced EPZ Boundary Clarence Lobo Elementary School Marblehead Elementary School Our Lady of Fatima School 618, 121, 1200, 59, 60, 122, 1251, 61, 62, 63, 64, 124, 125, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, San Clemente High School 5 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, Vista Del Mar Elementary School 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, Vista Del Mar Middle School 1453, 83, 84 Clarence Lobo Marblehead Elementary School Concordia Elementary School Las Palmas Elementary School 558, 559, 813, 119, 814, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 122, 1251, 61, 62, 63, 64, Our Savior's Lutheran School 6 124, 125, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, Concordia Elementary School 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, Las Palmas State Preschool 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 Our Savior's Lutheran Preschool Rancho Capistrano School 7 Stoneybrooke Christian Schools 147, 146, 149, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 Stoneybrooke Christian Schools Monarch Bay Montessori Academy 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, Monarch Bay Montessori Academy 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 139, 1724, 8

138, 1413, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, South Shores Christian Preschool 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 283, 285, 287, 289, 291, 1547, 434, 432, 9 South Shores Christian School 437, 439, 441, 443 1646, 1645, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 10 San Juan Hills High School 277, 278, 279, 280 739, 740, 1175, 120, 1179, 56, 57, 58, Calle Sonora Place 59, 60, 122, 1251, 61, 62, 63, 64, 124, 11 125, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, Casa Paraiso Arlena 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 Mirabel by the Sea V 589, 1235, 590, 127, 126, 125, 65, 66, Rosehaven I 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 12 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, Rosehaven III 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 Accent on Seniors 593, 592, 588, 1706, 589, 1235, 590, Chateau by the Golf Course 127, 1280, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 14 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, Tender Touch Eldercare 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 826 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Bus Route Nodes Traversed from Route Start to EPZ Number Description/Facilities Serviced Boundary Saddleback Memorial Medical Center 609, 610, 611, 612, 613, 126, 127, 1280, San Clemente Villas by the Sea 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 15 Aegis of Dana Point 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, Mirabel By the Sea 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 Leriza's Guest Home 1271, 1225, 1285, 130, 132, 1284, 68, 69, Niguel Hills Villa I 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 16 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, Time & Patience 83, 84 Camino Hills Care Home 2 1248, 711, 712, 713, 607, 608, 609, 610, Camino Hills of San Clemente 611, 612, 613, 126, 127, 1280, 65, 66, 17 Malash Gardens 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, Seaview Care Home 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 978, 973, 975, 976, 977, 691, 690, 689, 688, 982, 661, 660, 659, 986, 657, 656, 655, 654, 653, 652, 651, 650, 649, 626, 18 Talega Terrace 123, 1252, 1256, 61, 62, 63, 64, 124, 125, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 1324, 396, 393, 1720, 563, 1342, 71, 72, 19 Fountains At Sea Bluffs 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 1650, 1649, 281, 283, 285, 287, 289, 291, Bayside Terrace 1547, 434, 294, 1672, 1555, 296, 1559, 20 298, 1470, 1469, 300, 302, 304, 308, Seaside Terrace 1458, 155, 1454, 153, 1453, 83, 84 1344, 1343, 567, 563, 1342, 71, 72, 73, 22 Sea Bright Place 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 1712, 319, 1624, 320, 323, 324, 1623, 1616, 1340, 1349, 328, 331, 332, 330, 23 Del Obispo Terrace Senior Living 1723, 1357, 138, 1413, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 Atria San Juan Casa De Amma 1400, 139, 1724, 138, 1413, 76, 77, 142, 24 Emeritus at San Juan Capistrano 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, San Juan Capistrano South Dialysis 83, 84 Tessie's Place Loving Care Home #1 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 827 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Bus Route Nodes Traversed from Route Start to Number Description/Facilities Serviced EPZ Boundary Silverado Senior Living San Juan Capistrano 1387, 494, 141, 140, 145, 142, 78, 79, 80, 25 Tessie's Place Loving Care Home #2 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 Tessie's Place Loving Care Home #3 St. Michael's Christian Academy 1181, 815, 532, 755, 1714, 120, 1179, 56, San Clemente Presbyterian Preschool 57, 58, 59, 60, 122, 1251, 61, 62, 63, 64, 31 San Clemente Preschool 124, 125, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, Serra Preschool 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, St. Michaels Infant/Toddler Center 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 621, 622, 623, 624, 625, 626, 123, 1252, 1256, 61, 62, 63, 64, 124, 125, 65, 66, 32 Bright Horizons at San Clemente 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 Kindercare Learning Center 641, 642, 643, 1212, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 817, 619, 1201, 618, 121, 1200, 59, 60, 122, 1251, 61, 62, 63, 64, 124, 125, 33 Talega Life Church Preschool 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 La Cristianita Preschool 594, 593, 592, 588, 1706, 589, 1235, 590, 127, 126, 125, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 34 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, Palisades United Methodist Preschool 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 Little Minds Montessori Academy 1663, 1665, 563, 1342, 71, 72, 73, 74, 35 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, Ohana Preschool 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 Dana Montessori School 393, 1720, 563, 1342, 71, 72, 73, 74, Dana Point Montessori 36 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, Gloria Dei Lutheran Preschool 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 St Edward's Catholic Preschool 487, 139, 1724, 138, 1413, 76, 77, 142, Capistrano Beach Cities YMCADel Obispo 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 37 487, 139, 1724, 138, 1413, 76, 77, 142, Childbridge Preschool 78, 79, 80, 527, 1417, 81, 150, 82, 1453, 83, 84 San Onofre School 803, 804, 101, 805, 99, 1144, 47, 46, 45, San Onofre Youth Center 40 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, San Onofre Child Development Center 33, 95, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25 PAZ 1 Western MCB San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 828 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Bus Route Nodes Traversed from Route Start to EPZ Number Description/Facilities Serviced Boundary 888, 889, 890, 891, 892, 893, 894, 895, 896, 897, 898, 899, 935, 936, 900, 901, 41 PAZ 3 Central MCB 912, 913, 914, 915, 916, 917, 918, 956, 955, 954, 1141, 957, 953, 952, 951 552, 553, 554, 555, 556, 111, 557, 558, 559, 813, 119, 814, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 122, 1251, 61, 62, 63, 64, 124, 42 PAZ 4 TAPs 1,3,4,5 125, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 519, 520 778, 777, 776, 775, 774, 773, 772, 769, 770, 771, 530, 531, 532, 755, 1714, 120, 1179, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 122, 1251, 61, 43 PAZ 4 TAPs 2,7,8,9,10 62, 63, 64, 124, 125, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 519, 520 637, 638, 639, 640, 641, 642, 643, 1212, 644, 645, 646, 647, 648, 817, 619, 1201, 618, 121, 1200, 59, 60, 122, 1251, 61, 62, 44 PAZ 4 TAPs 6,17,18 63, 64, 124, 125, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 519, 520 694, 693, 692, 691, 690, 696, 695, 699, 700, 987, 657, 656, 655, 654, 653, 652, 651, 650, 649, 626, 123, 1252, 1256, 61, 45 PAZ 4 TAPs 15,19,20 62, 63, 64, 124, 125, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 519, 520 720, 721, 722, 723, 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 607, 608, 609, 610, 611, 612, 46 PAZ 4 TAPs 13, 14, 16, 21 613, 126, 127, 1280, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 519, 520 1272, 1271, 1225, 1285, 130, 132, 1284, 47 PAZ 5 TAPs 23, 24, 32 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 519, 520 604, 603, 602, 601, 600, 599, 598, 597, 596, 595, 594, 593, 592, 588, 1706, 589, 48 PAZs 4,5 TAPs 11,12,22,25,28 1235, 590, 127, 1280, 65, 66, 128, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 519, 520 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 829 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Bus Route Nodes Traversed from Route Start to EPZ Number Description/Facilities Serviced Boundary 263, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 1645, 272, 49 PAZ 5 TAPs 29,31 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280 393, 1720, 563, 1342, 71, 72, 73, 74, 50 PAZ 5 TAPs 26,27,30 1356, 75, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 519, 520 1287, 1345, 1286, 1397, 1399, 1414, 51 PAZ 5 TAPs 33,41,42 1400, 139, 1724, 138, 1413, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 519, 520 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 139, 487, 488, 52 PAZ 5 TAPs 40,43 489, 490, 491, 492, 493, 141, 140, 145, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 519, 520 329, 1396, 1416, 472, 473, 474, 144, 53 PAZ 5 TAPs 37,38,39 1391, 143, 1729, 140, 145, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 519, 520 1334, 1336, 317, 1712, 319, 1624, 320, 323, 324, 1623, 1616, 1340, 1349, 328, 54 PAZ 5 TAPs 34,35,36 331, 332, 330, 1723, 1357, 138, 1413, 76, 77, 142, 78, 79, 80, 527, 519, 520 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 830 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 87. School Evacuation Time Estimates Good Weather Travel Time Travel from Dist. To Time to Dist. EPZ EPZ Driver Loading EPZ Average EPZ Bdry to Bdry to ETE to Mobilization Time Bdry Speed Bdry ETE R.C. R.C. R.C.

School Time (min) (min) (mi) (mph) (min) (hr:min) (mi.) (min) (hr:min)

Orange County Private Schools Our Lady of Fatima School 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 Our Savior's Lutheran School 90 15 12.4 13.0 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 St. Michael's Christian Academy 90 15 10.3 9.4 66 2:55 17.4 24 3:15 Broderick Montessori School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Capistrano Home School 90 15 5.3 15.6 21 2:10 17.4 24 2:30 Capistrano Valley Christian Schools 90 15 5.3 15.6 21 2:10 17.4 24 2:30 Capo Beach Calvary 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Jserra Catholic High School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Mission Parish School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Monarch Bay Montessori Academy 90 15 0.9 29.4 2 1:50 20.1 27 2:15 Rancho Capistrano School 90 15 0.1 5.5 2 1:50 19.8 27 2:15 Saddleback Valley Christian School 90 15 12.4 26.9 28 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 San Juan Montessori 90 15 5.3 15.6 21 2:10 17.4 24 2:30 South Shores Christian School 90 15 0.5 4.5 7 1:55 21 28 2:20 St Edward School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 St. Margaret's Episcopal School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Stonebridge Day School 90 15 3.4 18.6 11 2:00 17.4 24 2:20 Stoneybrooke Christian Schools 90 15 0.1 26.9 1 1:50 19.8 27 2:15 Orange County Public Schools Bernice Ayer Middle School 90 15 9.3 7.4 76 3:05 17.4 24 3:25 Clarence Lobo Elementary School 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 Concordia Elementary School 90 15 12.4 13.0 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Las Palmas Elementary School 90 15 12.4 13.0 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Marblehead Elementary School 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 San Clemente High School 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 831 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Time Travel from Dist. To Time to Dist. EPZ EPZ Driver Loading EPZ Average EPZ Bdry to Bdry to ETE to Mobilization Time Bdry Speed Bdry ETE R.C. R.C. R.C.

School Time (min) (min) (mi) (mph) (min) (hr:min) (mi.) (min) (hr:min)

Shorecliffs Middle School 90 15 9.3 7.4 76 3:05 17.4 24 3:25 Truman Benedict Elementary School 90 15 9.3 7.4 76 3:05 17.4 24 3:25 Vista Del Mar Elementary School 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 Vista Del Mar Middle School 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 Ambuehl Elementary School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Dana Hills High School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Del Obispo Elementary School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Kinoshita Elementary School 90 15 5.3 15.6 21 2:10 17.4 24 2:30 Marco Forster Middle School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Palisades Elementary School 90 15 9.3 7.4 76 3:05 17.4 24 3:25 Richard Henry Dana Elementary School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Richard Henry Dana Exceptional Needs School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 San Juan Elementary School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 San Juan Hills High School 90 15 5.7 29.5 12 2:00 19.1 26 2:25 Serra High School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Orange County Preschools/Daycares Bright Horizons at San Clemente 90 15 9.3 8.2 68 2:55 17.4 24 3:20 Clarence Lobo 90 15 9.9 12.3 49 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 Concordia Elementary School 90 15 12.4 13.0 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Kindercare Learning Center 90 15 11.7 5.0 140 4:05 17.4 24 4:30 La Cristianita Preschool 90 15 8.5 9.0 57 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Las Palmas State Preschool 90 15 12.4 12.8 59 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Marblehead Elementary School 90 15 9.9 12.0 50 2:35 17.4 24 3:00 Our Savior's Lutheran Preschool 90 15 12.4 12.6 59 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Palisades United Methodist Preschool 90 15 8.5 8.4 61 2:50 17.4 24 3:10 San Clemente Presbyterian Preschool 90 15 10.3 9.1 68 2:55 17.4 24 3:20 San Clemente Preschool 90 15 10.3 9.1 68 2:55 17.4 24 3:20 Serra Preschool 90 15 10.3 8.6 72 3:00 17.4 24 3:25 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 832 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Time Travel from Dist. To Time to Dist. EPZ EPZ Driver Loading EPZ Average EPZ Bdry to Bdry to ETE to Mobilization Time Bdry Speed Bdry ETE R.C. R.C. R.C.

School Time (min) (min) (mi) (mph) (min) (hr:min) (mi.) (min) (hr:min)

St. Michaels Infant/Toddler Center 90 15 10.3 8.3 75 3:00 17.4 24 3:25 Talega Life Church Preschool 90 15 11.7 4.3 164 4:30 17.4 24 4:55 Broderick Montessori School, Inc 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Capistrano Beach Cities YMCADel Obispo 90 15 3.7 26.2 9 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Capo Beach Calvary 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 Capo Valley Head Start 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Childbridge Preschool 90 15 3.7 26.2 9 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Dana Montessori School 90 15 6.9 7.2 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Dana Point Montessori 90 15 6.9 7.2 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Evelyn Lobo Villegas Head Start 90 15 5.3 13.6 24 2:10 17.4 24 2:35 Gloria Dei Lutheran Preschool 90 15 6.9 7.2 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 Kinoshita Elementary School 90 15 5.3 13.6 24 2:10 17.4 24 2:35 Little Minds Montessori Academy 90 15 6 9.6 38 2:25 17.4 24 2:50 Mission Parish School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Monarch Bay Montessori Academy 90 15 0.9 29.4 2 1:50 20.1 27 2:15 Ohana Preschool 90 15 6 9.6 38 2:25 17.4 24 2:50 Palisades Elementary School 90 15 9.3 7.1 79 3:05 17.4 24 3:30 Richard Henry Dana Elementary School 90 15 8.8 18.6 29 2:15 17.4 24 2:40 San Juan Montessori 90 15 5.3 13.6 24 2:10 17.4 24 2:35 South Shores Christian Preschool 90 15 0.9 29.4 2 1:50 20.1 27 2:15 St Edward's Catholic Preschool 90 15 6.9 7.2 58 2:45 17.4 24 3:10 St. Margaret's Episcopal School 90 15 3.4 26.9 8 1:55 17.4 24 2:20 Stoneybrooke Christian Schools 90 15 0 5.5 0 1:45 19.8 27 2:15 MCB Schools San Onofre School 90 15 20.9 11.2 112 3:40 5.0 7 3:45 San Onofre Youth Center 90 15 20.9 11.2 112 3:40 5.0 7 3:45 MCB Preschools/Daycares San Onofre Child Development Center 90 15 20.9 11.2 112 3:40 5.0 7 3:45 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 833 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Time Travel from Dist. To Time to Dist. EPZ EPZ Driver Loading EPZ Average EPZ Bdry to Bdry to ETE to Mobilization Time Bdry Speed Bdry ETE R.C. R.C. R.C.

School Time (min) (min) (mi) (mph) (min) (hr:min) (mi.) (min) (hr:min)

Maximum for EPZ: 4:30 Maximum: 4:55 Average for EPZ: 2:30 Average: 2:55 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 834 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 88. School Evacuation Time Estimates Rain Travel Travel Time Dist. To Time to Dist. EPZ from Driver Loading EPZ Average EPZ Bdry to EPZ Bdry ETE to Mobilization Time Bdry Speed Bdry ETE R.C. to H.S. R.C.

School Time (min) (min) (mi) (mph) (min) (hr:min) (mi.) (min) (hr:min)

Orange County Private Schools Our Lady of Fatima School 100 20 9.9 10.5 57 3:00 17.4 27 3:25 Our Savior's Lutheran School 100 20 12.4 10.1 74 3:15 17.4 27 3:45 St. Michael's Christian Academy 100 20 10.3 8.9 70 3:10 17.4 27 3:40 Broderick Montessori School 100 20 8.8 16.8 32 2:35 17.4 27 3:00 Capistrano Home School 100 20 5.3 13.8 23 2:25 17.4 27 2:50 Capistrano Valley Christian Schools 100 20 5.3 13.8 23 2:25 17.4 27 2:50 Capo Beach Calvary 100 20 8.8 16.8 32 2:35 17.4 27 3:00 Jserra Catholic High School 100 20 3.4 23.3 9 2:10 17.4 27 2:40 Mission Parish School 100 20 3.4 23.3 9 2:10 17.4 27 2:40 Monarch Bay Montessori Academy 100 20 0.9 24.2 3 2:05 20.1 31 2:35 Rancho Capistrano School 100 20 0.1 5.4 2 2:05 19.8 30 2:35 Saddleback Valley Christian School 100 20 12.4 23.7 32 2:35 17.4 27 3:00 San Juan Montessori 100 20 5.3 13.8 23 2:25 17.4 27 2:50 South Shores Christian School 100 20 0.5 3.6 9 2:10 21 32 2:45 St Edward School 100 20 8.8 16.8 32 2:35 17.4 27 3:00 St. Margaret's Episcopal School 100 20 3.4 23.3 9 2:10 17.4 27 2:40 Stonebridge Day School 100 20 3.4 16.8 13 2:15 17.4 27 2:40 Stoneybrooke Christian Schools 100 20 0.1 23.3 1 2:05 19.8 30 2:35 Orange County Public Schools Bernice Ayer Middle School 100 20 9.3 7.1 79 3:20 17.4 27 3:50 Clarence Lobo Elementary School 100 20 9.9 10.5 57 3:00 17.4 27 3:25 Concordia Elementary School 100 20 12.4 10.1 74 3:15 17.4 27 3:45 Las Palmas Elementary School 100 20 12.4 10.1 74 3:15 17.4 27 3:45 Marblehead Elementary School 100 20 9.9 10.5 57 3:00 17.4 27 3:25 San Clemente High School 100 20 9.9 10.5 57 3:00 17.4 27 3:25 Shorecliffs Middle School 100 20 9.3 7.1 79 3:20 17.4 27 3:50 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 835 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Travel Time Dist. To Time to Dist. EPZ from Driver Loading EPZ Average EPZ Bdry to EPZ Bdry ETE to Mobilization Time Bdry Speed Bdry ETE R.C. to H.S. R.C.

School Time (min) (min) (mi) (mph) (min) (hr:min) (mi.) (min) (hr:min)

Truman Benedict Elementary School 100 20 9.3 7.1 79 3:20 17.4 27 3:50 Vista Del Mar Elementary School 100 20 9.9 10.5 57 3:00 17.4 27 3:25 Vista Del Mar Middle School 100 20 9.9 10.5 57 3:00 17.4 27 3:25 Ambuehl Elementary School 100 20 3.4 23.3 9 2:10 17.4 27 2:40 Dana Hills High School 100 20 8.8 16.8 32 2:35 17.4 27 3:00 Del Obispo Elementary School 100 20 8.8 16.8 32 2:35 17.4 27 3:00 Kinoshita Elementary School 100 20 5.3 13.8 23 2:25 17.4 27 2:50 Marco Forster Middle School 100 20 8.8 16.8 32 2:35 17.4 27 3:00 Palisades Elementary School 100 20 9.3 7.1 79 3:20 17.4 27 3:50 Richard Henry Dana Elementary School 100 20 8.8 16.8 32 2:35 17.4 27 3:00 Richard Henry Dana Exceptional Needs School 100 20 8.8 16.8 32 2:35 17.4 27 3:00 San Juan Elementary School 100 20 3.4 23.3 9 2:10 17.4 27 2:40 San Juan Hills High School 100 20 5.7 31.6 11 2:15 19.1 29 2:40 Serra High School 100 20 3.4 23.3 9 2:10 17.4 27 2:40 Orange County Preschools/Daycares Bright Horizons at San Clemente 100 20 9.3 7.5 75 3:15 17.4 27 3:45 Clarence Lobo 100 20 9.9 10.5 57 3:00 17.4 27 3:25 Concordia Elementary School 100 20 12.4 10.1 74 3:15 17.4 27 3:45 Kindercare Learning Center 100 20 11.7 4.7 149 4:30 17.4 27 5:00 La Cristianita Preschool 100 20 8.5 7.7 67 3:10 17.4 27 3:35 Las Palmas State Preschool 100 20 12.4 9.4 79 3:20 17.4 27 3:50 Marblehead Elementary School 100 20 9.9 9.4 64 3:05 17.4 27 3:25 Our Savior's Lutheran Preschool 100 20 12.4 8.4 89 3:30 17.4 27 4:00 Palisades United Methodist Preschool 100 20 8.5 7.8 66 3:10 17.4 27 3:35 San Clemente Presbyterian Preschool 100 20 10.3 8.4 74 3:15 17.4 27 3:45 San Clemente Preschool 100 20 10.3 8.8 71 3:15 17.4 27 3:40 Serra Preschool 100 20 10.3 8.7 72 3:15 17.4 27 3:40 St. Michaels Infant/Toddler Center 100 20 10.3 9.1 68 3:10 17.4 27 3:35 Talega Life Church Preschool 100 20 11.7 4.2 168 4:50 17.4 27 5:15 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 836 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Travel Time Dist. To Time to Dist. EPZ from Driver Loading EPZ Average EPZ Bdry to EPZ Bdry ETE to Mobilization Time Bdry Speed Bdry ETE R.C. to H.S. R.C.

School Time (min) (min) (mi) (mph) (min) (hr:min) (mi.) (min) (hr:min)

Broderick Montessori School, Inc 100 20 8.8 15.2 35 2:35 17.4 27 3:05 Capistrano Beach Cities YMCADel Obispo 100 20 3.7 21.0 11 2:15 17.4 27 2:40 Capo Beach Calvary 100 20 8.8 15.2 35 2:35 17.4 27 3:00 Capo Valley Head Start 100 20 3.4 22.0 10 2:10 17.4 27 2:40 Childbridge Preschool 100 20 3.7 21.0 11 2:15 17.4 27 2:40 Dana Montessori School 100 20 6.9 7.1 59 3:00 17.4 27 3:30 Dana Point Montessori 100 20 6.9 7.1 59 3:00 17.4 27 3:30 Evelyn Lobo Villegas Head Start 100 20 5.3 13.2 25 2:25 17.4 27 2:55 Gloria Dei Lutheran Preschool 100 20 6.9 7.1 59 3:00 17.4 27 3:30 Kinoshita Elementary School 100 20 5.3 13.2 25 2:25 17.4 27 2:50 Little Minds Montessori Academy 100 20 6 9.3 39 2:40 17.4 27 3:10 Mission Parish School 100 20 3.4 22.0 10 2:10 17.4 27 2:40 Monarch Bay Montessori Academy 100 20 0.9 24.2 3 2:05 20.1 31 2:35 Ohana Preschool 100 20 6 9.3 39 2:40 17.4 27 3:10 Palisades Elementary School 100 20 9.3 6.6 85 3:25 17.4 27 3:50 Richard Henry Dana Elementary School 100 20 8.8 15.2 35 2:35 17.4 27 3:00 San Juan Montessori 100 20 5.3 13.2 25 2:25 17.4 27 2:50 South Shores Christian Preschool 100 20 0.9 24.2 3 2:05 20.1 31 2:35 St Edward's Catholic Preschool 100 20 6.9 7.1 59 3:00 17.4 27 3:30 St. Margaret's Episcopal School 100 20 3.4 22.0 10 2:10 17.4 27 2:40 Stoneybrooke Christian Schools 100 20 0 5.4 0 2:00 19.8 30 2:35 MCB Schools San Onofre School 100 20 20.9 10.0 126 4:10 5.0 8 4:15 San Onofre Youth Center 100 20 20.9 10.0 126 4:10 5.0 8 4:15 MCB Preschools/Daycares San Onofre Child Development Center 100 20 20.9 10.0 126 4:10 5.0 8 4:15 Maximum for EPZ: 4:50 Maximum: 5:15 Average for EPZ: 2:50 Average: 3:15 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 837 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 89. Summary of TransitDependent Bus Routes No. of Length Route Buses Route Description (mi.)

40 4 PAZ 1 MCB San Onofre 20.9 PAZ 3 Central MCB - Camp San Onofre, Camp Horno, Camp Las 41 12 15.4 Pulgas, and Camp Las Flores 42 12 Servicing TAPs 1,3,4,5 within San Clemente in PAZ 4 12.7 43 16 Servicing TAPs 2,7,8,9,10 within San Clemente in PAZ 4 13.4 44 9 Servicing TAPs 6,17,18 within San Clemente in PAZ 4 15.0 45 9 Servicing TAPs 15,19,20 within San Clemente in PAZ 4 13.4 46 12 Servicing TAPs 13, 14, 16, within San Clemente in PAZ 4 11.3 47 10 Servicing TAPs 23, 24, 32 within Dana Point in PAZ 5 7.5 Servicing TAPs 11,12,22 within San Clemente and Capistrano Beach in 48 13 12.1 PAZs 4 and 5 49 7 Servicing TAPs 29,31 within Dana Point in PAZ 5 3.2 50 10 Servicing TAPs 26,27,30 within Dana Point in PAZ 5 7.5 51 10 Servicing TAPs 33,41,42 within San Juan Capistrano in PAZ 5 5.2 52 7 Servicing TAPs 40,43 within an Juan Capistrano in PAZ 5 3.8 53 10 Servicing TAPs 37,38,39 within San Juan Capistrano in PAZ 5 3.5 54 10 Servicing TAPs 34,35,36 within San Juan Capistrano in PAZ 5 6.4 Total: 151 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 838 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 810. TransitDependent Evacuation Time Estimates Good Weather OneWave TwoWave Route Travel Route Route Travel Pickup Distance Time to Driver Travel Pickup Route Bus Mobilization Length Speed Time Time ETE to R. C. R. C. Unload Rest Time Time ETE Number Number (min) (miles) (mph) (min) (min) (hr:min) (miles) (min) (min) (min) (min) (min) (hr:min) 40 1,2 105 20.9 46.4 27 30 2:45 5.0 7 5 10 57 30 4:35 40 3,4 115 20.9 50.8 25 30 2:50 5.0 7 5 10 57 30 4:40 41 1,2,3,4 105 15.4 10.4 89 30 3:45 5.7 8 5 10 89 30 6:10 41 5,6,7,8 115 15.4 10.4 89 30 3:55 5.7 8 5 10 87 30 6:15 41 9,10,11,12 125 15.4 10.3 90 30 4:05 5.7 8 5 10 84 30 6:25 42 1,2,3,4 105 12.7 12.7 60 30 3:15 17.4 23 5 10 61 30 5:25 42 5,6,7,8 115 12.7 13.4 57 30 3:25 17.4 23 5 10 58 30 5:35 42 9,10,11,12 125 12.7 14.1 54 30 3:30 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 5:35 43 1,2,3,4 105 13.4 8.5 94 30 3:50 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 5:55 43 5,6,7,8 115 13.4 9.2 87 30 3:55 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 6:00 43 9,10,11,12 125 13.4 9.5 85 30 4:00 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 6:05 43 13,14,15,16 135 13.4 10.2 79 30 4:05 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 6:10 44 1,2,3 105 15.0 4.6 194 30 5:30 17.4 23 5 10 60 30 7:40 44 4,5,6, 115 15.0 4.8 188 30 5:35 17.4 23 5 10 60 30 7:45 44 7,8,9 125 15.0 5.0 181 30 5:40 17.4 23 5 10 60 30 7:50 45 1,2,3 105 13.4 4.8 168 30 5:05 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 7:10 45 4,5,6, 115 13.4 5.2 155 30 5:00 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 7:05 45 7,8,9 125 13.4 5.3 152 30 5:10 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 7:15 46 1,2,3,4 105 11.3 3.7 183 30 5:20 17.4 23 5 10 51 30 7:20 46 5,6,7,8 115 11.3 3.8 179 30 5:25 17.4 23 5 10 51 30 7:25 46 9,10,11,12 125 11.3 3.9 172 30 5:30 17.4 23 5 10 51 30 7:30 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 839 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

OneWave TwoWave Route Travel Route Route Travel Pickup Distance Time to Driver Travel Pickup Route Bus Mobilization Length Speed Time Time ETE to R. C. R. C. Unload Rest Time Time ETE Number Number (min) (miles) (mph) (min) (min) (hr:min) (miles) (min) (min) (min) (min) (min) (hr:min) 47 1,2,3,4 105 7.5 17.9 25 30 2:45 17.4 23 5 10 46 30 4:40 47 5,6,7 115 7.5 18.2 25 30 2:50 17.4 23 5 10 45 30 4:45 47 8,9,10 125 7.5 18.5 24 30 3:00 17.4 23 5 10 44 30 4:55 48 1,2,3,4 105 12.1 7.9 92 30 3:50 17.4 23 5 10 59 30 6:00 48 5,6,7,8 115 12.1 8.1 90 30 3:55 17.4 23 5 10 58 30 6:05 48 9,10,11 125 12.1 8.6 84 30 4:00 17.4 23 5 10 56 30 6:05 48 12,13 135 12.1 8.8 82 30 4:10 17.4 23 5 10 55 30 6:15 49 1,2,3,4 105 3.2 20.3 9 30 2:25 20.1 27 5 10 37 30 4:15 49 5,6,7 115 3.2 26.3 7 30 2:35 20.1 27 5 10 37 30 4:25 50 1,2,3,4 105 7.5 6.9 65 30 3:20 17.4 23 5 10 42 30 5:10 50 5,6,7 115 7.5 7.1 64 30 3:30 17.4 23 5 10 41 30 5:20 50 8,9,10 125 7.5 7.8 58 30 3:35 17.4 23 5 10 41 30 5:25 51 1,2,3,4 105 5.2 20.3 15 30 2:35 17.4 23 5 10 36 30 4:20 51 5,6,7 115 5.2 21.4 15 30 2:40 17.4 23 5 10 36 30 4:25 51 8,9,10 125 5.2 22.5 14 30 2:50 17.4 23 5 10 36 30 4:35 52 1,2,3,4 105 3.8 28.3 8 30 2:25 17.4 23 5 10 34 30 4:10 52 5,6,7 115 3.8 39.1 6 30 2:35 17.4 23 5 10 33 30 4:20 53 1,2,3,4 105 3.5 7.3 29 30 2:45 17.4 23 5 10 33 30 4:30 53 5,6,7 115 3.5 7.7 27 30 2:55 17.4 23 5 10 33 30 4:40 53 8,9,10 125 3.5 8.7 24 30 3:00 17.4 23 5 10 33 30 4:45 54 1,2,3,4 105 6.4 7.7 50 30 3:05 17.4 23 5 10 42 30 4:55 54 5,6,7 115 6.4 8.7 44 30 3:10 17.4 23 5 10 42 30 5:00 54 8,9,10 125 6.4 10.0 38 30 3:15 17.4 23 5 10 42 30 5:05 Maximum ETE: 5:40 Maximum ETE: 7:50 Average ETE: 3:45 Average ETE: 5:40 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 840 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 811. TransitDependent Evacuation Time Estimates Rain OneWave TwoWave Route Travel Route Route Travel Pickup Distance Time to Driver Travel Pickup Route Bus Mobilization Length Speed Time Time ETE to R. C. R. C. Unload Rest Time Time ETE Number Number (min) (miles) (mph) (min) (min) (hr:min) (miles) (min) (min) (min) (min) (min) (hr:min) 40 1,2 115 20.9 46.4 27 40 3:05 5.0 8 5 10 64 40 5:15 40 3,4 125 20.9 48.8 26 40 3:15 5.0 8 5 10 64 40 5:25 41 1,2,3,4 115 15.4 9.5 97 40 4:15 5.7 9 5 10 100 40 7:00 41 5,6,7,8 125 15.4 9.4 98 40 4:25 5.7 9 5 10 98 40 7:10 41 9,10,11,12 135 15.4 9.6 96 40 4:35 5.7 9 5 10 96 40 7:15 42 1,2,3,4 115 12.7 10.0 76 40 3:55 17.4 26 5 10 65 40 6:25 42 5,6,7,8 125 12.7 10.6 72 40 4:00 17.4 26 5 10 64 40 6:30 42 9,10,11,12 135 12.7 11.1 69 40 4:05 17.4 26 5 10 63 40 6:30 43 1,2,3,4 115 13.4 7.1 113 40 4:30 17.4 26 5 10 62 40 6:55 43 5,6,7,8 125 13.4 7.5 108 40 4:35 17.4 26 5 10 62 40 7:00 43 9,10,11,12 135 13.4 7.9 102 40 4:40 17.4 26 5 10 62 40 7:05 43 13,14,15,16 145 13.4 8.5 95 40 4:40 17.4 26 5 10 62 40 7:05 44 1,2,3 115 15.0 4.2 214 40 6:10 17.4 26 5 10 67 40 8:40 44 4,5,6, 125 15.0 4.3 208 40 6:15 17.4 26 5 10 67 40 8:45 44 7,8,9 135 15.0 4.5 202 40 6:20 17.4 26 5 10 67 40 8:50 45 1,2,3 115 13.4 4.4 183 40 5:40 17.4 26 5 10 62 40 8:05 45 4,5,6, 125 13.4 4.6 176 40 5:45 17.4 26 5 10 62 40 8:10 45 7,8,9 135 13.4 4.6 173 40 5:50 17.4 26 5 10 62 40 8:15 46 1,2,3,4 115 11.3 3.5 193 40 5:50 17.4 26 5 10 57 40 8:10 46 5,6,7,8 125 11.3 3.6 191 40 6:00 17.4 26 5 10 57 40 8:20 46 9,10,11,12 135 11.3 3.6 189 40 6:05 17.4 26 5 10 57 40 8:25 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 841 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

OneWave TwoWave Route Travel Route Route Travel Pickup Distance Time to Driver Travel Pickup Route Bus Mobilization Length Speed Time Time ETE to R. C. R. C. Unload Rest Time Time ETE Number Number (min) (miles) (mph) (min) (min) (hr:min) (miles) (min) (min) (min) (min) (min) (hr:min) 47 1,2,3,4 115 7.5 16.4 27 40 3:05 17.4 26 5 10 49 40 5:20 47 5,6,7 125 7.5 17.3 26 40 3:15 17.4 26 5 10 47 40 5:25 47 8,9,10 135 7.5 16.8 27 40 3:25 17.4 26 5 10 46 40 5:35 48 1,2,3,4 115 12.1 7.1 103 40 4:20 17.4 26 5 10 67 40 6:50 48 5,6,7,8 125 12.1 7.4 99 40 4:25 17.4 26 5 10 65 40 6:55 48 9,10,11 135 12.1 7.6 96 40 4:35 17.4 26 5 10 63 40 7:00 48 12,13 145 12.1 8.0 91 40 4:40 17.4 26 5 10 63 40 7:05 49 1,2,3,4 115 3.2 24.0 8 40 2:45 20.1 30 5 10 41 40 4:55 49 5,6,7 125 3.2 19.1 10 40 3:00 20.1 30 5 10 41 40 5:10 50 1,2,3,4 115 7.5 6.6 68 40 3:45 17.4 26 5 10 46 40 5:55 50 5,6,7 125 7.5 6.6 68 40 3:55 17.4 26 5 10 46 40 6:05 50 8,9,10 135 7.5 6.7 67 40 4:05 17.4 26 5 10 46 40 6:15 51 1,2,3,4 115 5.2 21.1 15 40 2:50 17.4 26 5 10 40 40 4:55 51 5,6,7 125 5.2 22.4 14 40 3:00 17.4 26 5 10 40 40 5:05 51 8,9,10 135 5.2 22.6 14 40 3:10 17.4 26 5 10 40 40 5:15 52 1,2,3,4 115 3.8 24.4 9 40 2:45 17.4 26 5 10 37 40 4:45 52 5,6,7 125 3.8 37.6 6 40 2:55 17.4 26 5 10 37 40 4:55 53 1,2,3,4 115 3.5 6.4 33 40 3:10 17.4 26 5 10 37 40 5:10 53 5,6,7 125 3.5 7.3 29 40 3:15 17.4 26 5 10 37 40 5:15 53 8,9,10 135 3.5 8.4 25 40 3:20 17.4 26 5 10 37 40 5:20 54 1,2,3,4 115 6.4 8.2 47 40 3:25 17.4 26 5 10 47 40 5:35 54 5,6,7 125 6.4 8.7 44 40 3:30 17.4 26 5 10 46 40 5:40 54 8,9,10 135 6.4 10.0 38 40 3:35 17.4 26 5 10 46 40 5:45 Maximum ETE: 6:20 Maximum ETE: 8:50 Average ETE: 4:15 Average ETE: 6:30 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 842 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 812. Medical Facility Evacuation Time Estimates Good Weather Travel Loading Total Dist. Time to Rate Loading To EPZ EPZ Mobilization (min per Time Bdry Boundary ETE Medical Facility Patient (min) person) People (min) (mi) (min) (hr:min)

Ambulatory 90 1 3 8.3 49 2:35 Accent on Seniors Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 8.3 49 2:35 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 8.3 50 2:40 Ambulatory 90 1 3 10.5 62 2:45 Calle Sonora Place Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 10.5 62 2:45 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 10.5 60 2:50 Ambulatory 90 1 3 8.8 99 3:25 Camino Hills Care Home 2 Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 8.8 99 3:25 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 8.8 99 3:30 Ambulatory 90 1 3 8.8 99 3:25 Camino Hills of San Clemente Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 8.8 99 3:25 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 8.8 99 3:30 Ambulatory 90 1 3 10.5 62 2:45 Casa Paraiso Arlena Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 10.5 62 2:45 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 10.5 60 2:50 Ambulatory 90 1 3 8.3 49 2:35 Chateau by the Golf Course Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 8.3 49 2:35 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 8.3 50 2:40 Ambulatory 90 1 3 6.6 23 2:10 Leriza's Guest Home Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 6.6 23 2:10 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 6.6 23 2:15 Ambulatory 90 1 3 8.8 99 3:25 Malash Gardens Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 8.8 99 3:25 Bedridden 90 15 1 17 8.8 99 3:30 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 843 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Loading Total Dist. Time to Rate Loading To EPZ EPZ Mobilization (min per Time Bdry Boundary ETE Medical Facility Patient (min) person) People (min) (mi) (min) (hr:min)

Ambulatory 90 1 2 7.3 33 2:15 Mirabel by the Sea V Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 12 7.3 33 2:15 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 7.3 34 2:25 Ambulatory 90 1 3 7.3 33 2:20 Rosehaven I Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 7.3 33 2:20 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 7.3 34 2:25 Ambulatory 90 1 3 7.3 33 2:20 Rosehaven III Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 7.3 33 2:20 Bedridden 90 15 1 45 7.3 34 2:50 Ambulatory 90 1 43 7.5 54 3:10 Saddleback Memorial Medical Center Wheelchair bound 90 5 29 45 7.5 54 3:10 Bedridden 90 15 14 60 7.5 52 3:25 Ambulatory 90 1 126 7.5 54 3:10 San Clemente Villas by the Sea Wheelchair bound 90 5 28 45 7.5 54 3:10 Bedridden 90 15 14 33 7.5 54 3:00 Ambulatory 90 1 3 8.8 99 3:25 Seaview Care Home Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 8.8 99 3:25 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 8.8 99 3:30 Ambulatory 90 1 3 12.9 154 4:20 Talega Terrace Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 12.9 154 4:20 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 12.9 153 4:25 Ambulatory 90 1 3 8.3 49 2:35 Tender Touch Eldercare Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 8.3 49 2:35 Bedridden 90 15 1 45 8.3 49 3:05 Ambulatory 90 1 38 7.5 54 3:10 Aegis of Dana Point Wheelchair bound 90 5 25 45 7.5 54 3:10 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 844 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Loading Total Dist. Time to Rate Loading To EPZ EPZ Mobilization (min per Time Bdry Boundary ETE Medical Facility Patient (min) person) People (min) (mi) (min) (hr:min)

Bedridden 90 15 13 60 7.5 52 3:25 Ambulatory 90 1 75 3.2 8 2:25 Atria San Juan Wheelchair bound 90 5 4 45 3.2 8 2:25 Ambulatory 90 1 3 7.9 67 2:50 Bayside Terrace Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 7.9 67 2:50 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 7.9 67 2:55 Ambulatory 90 1 3 3.2 8 1:55 Casa De Amma Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 3.2 8 1:55 Bedridden 90 15 1 45 3.2 8 2:25 Ambulatory 90 1 70 5.9 29 2:45 Del Obispo Terrace Senior Living Wheelchair bound 90 5 10 45 5.9 29 2:45 Emeritus at San Juan Capistrano Ambulatory 90 1 87 30 3.2 7 2:10 Ambulatory 90 1 44 6.8 46 3:05 Fountains At Sea Bluffs Wheelchair bound 90 5 29 45 6.8 46 3:05 Bedridden 90 15 15 33 6.8 50 2:55 Ambulatory 90 1 3 7.5 54 2:40 Mirabel By the Sea Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 7.5 54 2:40 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 7.5 54 2:45 Ambulatory 90 1 3 6.6 23 2:10 Niguel Hills Villa I Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 6.6 23 2:10 Bedridden 90 15 1 24 6.6 22 2:20 Ambulatory 90 1 9 3.2 8 2:05 San Juan Capistrano South Dialysis Wheelchair bound 90 5 6 24 3.2 8 2:05 Bedridden 90 15 3 33 3.2 7 2:10 Ambulatory 90 1 3 6.2 24 2:10 Sea Bright Place Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 6.2 24 2:10 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 845 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Travel Loading Total Dist. Time to Rate Loading To EPZ EPZ Mobilization (min per Time Bdry Boundary ETE Medical Facility Patient (min) person) People (min) (mi) (min) (hr:min)

Bedridden 90 15 1 18 6.2 24 2:15 Ambulatory 90 1 3 7.9 67 2:50 Seaside Terrace Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 7.9 67 2:50 Bedridden 90 15 1 45 7.9 60 3:15 Silverado Senior Living San Juan Ambulatory 90 1 51 2.6 5 2:20 Capistrano Wheelchair bound 90 5 40 45 2.6 5 2:20 Ambulatory 90 1 3 3.2 8 1:55 Tessie's Place Loving Care Home #1 Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 3.2 8 1:55 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 3.2 8 2:00 Ambulatory 90 1 3 2.6 6 1:50 Tessie's Place Loving Care Home #2 Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 2.6 6 1:50 Bedridden 90 15 1 18 2.6 5 1:55 Ambulatory 90 1 3 2.6 6 1:50 Tessie's Place Loving Care Home #3 Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 13 2.6 6 1:50 Bedridden 90 15 1 15 2.6 6 1:55 Wheelchair bound 90 5 2 10 6.6 22 2:05 Time & Patience Bedridden 90 15 1 15 6.6 23 2:10 Maximum ETE: 4:25 Average ETE: 2:45 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 846 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 813. Medical Facility Evacuation Time Estimates Rain Loading Dist. Travel Rate Total To Time to (min Loading EPZ EPZ Mobilization per Time Bdry Boundary ETE Medical Facility Patient (min) person) People (min) (mi) (min) (hr:min)

Ambulatory 100 1 3 8.3 58 2:55 Accent on Seniors Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 13 8.3 58 2:55 Bedridden 100 15 1 18 8.3 57 2:55 Ambulatory 100 1 3 10.5 68 3:05 Calle Sonora Place Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 13 10.5 68 3:05 Bedridden 100 15 1 18 10.5 66 3:05 Ambulatory 100 1 3 8.8 108 3:45 Camino Hills Care Home 2 Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 13 8.8 108 3:45 Bedridden 100 15 1 18 8.8 107 3:45 Ambulatory 100 1 3 8.8 108 3:45 Camino Hills of San Clemente Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 13 8.8 108 3:45 Bedridden 100 15 1 18 8.8 107 3:45 Ambulatory 100 1 3 10.5 68 3:05 Casa Paraiso Arlena Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 13 10.5 68 3:05 Bedridden 100 15 1 18 10.5 66 3:05 Ambulatory 100 1 3 8.3 58 2:55 Chateau by the Golf Course Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 13 8.3 58 2:55 Bedridden 100 15 1 18 8.3 57 2:55 Ambulatory 100 1 3 6.6 24 2:20 Leriza's Guest Home Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 13 6.6 24 2:20 Bedridden 100 15 1 18 6.6 25 2:25 Ambulatory 100 1 3 8.8 108 3:45 Malash Gardens Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 13 8.8 108 3:45 Bedridden 100 15 1 17 8.8 107 3:45 Ambulatory 100 1 2 7.3 39 2:35 Mirabel by the Sea V Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 12 7.3 39 2:35 Bedridden 100 15 1 18 7.3 39 2:40 Rosehaven I Ambulatory 100 1 3 13 7.3 39 2:35 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 847 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Loading Dist. Travel Rate Total To Time to (min Loading EPZ EPZ Mobilization per Time Bdry Boundary ETE Medical Facility Patient (min) person) People (min) (mi) (min) (hr:min)

Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 7.3 39 2:35 Bedridden 100 15 1 18 7.3 39 2:40 Ambulatory 100 1 3 7.3 39 2:35 Rosehaven III Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 13 7.3 39 2:35 Bedridden 100 15 1 45 7.3 36 3:05 Ambulatory 100 1 43 7.5 54 3:20 Saddleback Memorial Medical Center Wheelchair bound 100 5 29 45 7.5 54 3:20 Bedridden 100 15 14 60 7.5 56 3:40 Ambulatory 100 1 126 7.5 54 3:20 San Clemente Villas by the Sea Wheelchair bound 100 5 28 45 7.5 54 3:20 Bedridden 100 15 14 33 7.5 55 3:10 Ambulatory 100 1 3 8.8 108 3:45 Seaview Care Home Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 13 8.8 108 3:45 Bedridden 100 15 1 18 8.8 107 3:45 Ambulatory 100 1 3 12.9 166 4:40 Talega Terrace Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 13 12.9 166 4:40 Bedridden 100 15 1 18 12.9 160 4:40 Ambulatory 100 1 3 8.3 58 2:55 Tender Touch Eldercare Wheelchair bound 100 5 2 13 8.3 58 2:55 Bedridden 100 15 1 45 8.3 55 3:20 Ambulatory 100 1 38 7.5 54 3:20 Aegis of Dana Point Wheelchair bound 100 5 25 45 7.5 54 3:20 Bedridden 100 15 13 60 7.5 56 3:40 Ambulatory 100 1 75 3.2 8 2:35 Atria San Juan Wheelchair bound 100 5 4 45 3.2 8 2:35 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 848 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

9 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STRATEGY This section discusses the suggested traffic control and management strategy that is designed to expedite the movement of evacuating traffic. The resources required to implement this strategy include:

• Personnel with the capabilities of performing the planned control functions of traffic guides (preferably, not necessarily, law enforcement officers).

• Traffic Control Devices to assist these personnel in the performance of their tasks. These devices should comply with the guidance of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) published by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) of the U.S.D.O.T. All state and most county transportation agencies have access to the MUTCD, which is available online: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov which provides access to the official PDF version.

• A plan that defines all locations, provides necessary details and is documented in a format that is readily understood by those assigned to perform traffic control.

The functions to be performed in the field are:

1. Facilitate evacuating traffic movements that safely expedite travel out of the EPZ.

2. Discourage traffic movements that move evacuating vehicles in a direction which takes them significantly closer to the power plant, or which interferes with the efficient flow of other evacuees.

The terms "facilitate" and "discourage" are employed rather than "enforce" and "prohibit" to indicate the need for flexibility in performing the traffic control function. There are always legitimate reasons for a driver to prefer a direction other than that indicated. For example:

• A driver may be traveling home from work or from another location, to join other family members prior to evacuating.

• An evacuating driver may be travelling to pick up a relative, or other evacuees.

• The driver may be an emergency worker en route to perform an important activity.

The implementation of a plan must also be flexible enough for the application of sound judgment by the traffic guide.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 91 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

The traffic management plan is the outcome of the following process:

1. The existing TCPs and ACPs identified by the offsite agencies in their existing emergency plans serve as the basis of the traffic management plan, as per NUREG/CR7002.

2. Computer analysis of the evacuation traffic flow environment.

This analysis identifies the best routing and those critical intersections that experience pronounced congestion. Any critical intersections that are not identified in the existing offsite plans are suggested as additional TCPs and ACPs

3. A field survey of the highway network within 15 miles of the power plant. The schematics describing modified control plans at TCPs designated in Appendix G are based on data collected during field surveys, upon large scale maps, and on overhead photos.

4. Consultation with emergency management and law enforcement personnel.

Trained personnel who are experienced in controlling traffic and are aware of the likely evacuation traffic patterns should review the control tactics at the suggested additional TCPs and ACPs.

5. Prioritization of TCPs and ACPs.

Application of traffic and access control at some TCPs and ACPs will have a more pronounced influence on expediting traffic movements than at other TCPs and ACPs. For example, TCPs controlling traffic originating from areas in close proximity to the power plant could have a more beneficial effect on minimizing potential exposure to radioactivity than those TCPs located far from the power plant. These priorities should be assigned by state/county emergency management representatives and by law enforcement personnel.

Recommended changes to the existing traffic management plans are identified in Appendix G.

These changes were discussed with the offsite agencies at the final meeting and will be incorporated into future revisions of the traffic management plans. These suggested TCPs primarily consist of removing restrictions imposed by the current configurations and therefore require fewer resources to establish them.

The use of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) technologies (if available) could reduce manpower and equipment needs, while still facilitating the evacuation process. Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) can be placed within the EPZ to provide information to travelers regarding traffic conditions, route selection, and reception center information. DMS can also be placed outside of the EPZ to warn motorists to avoid using routes that may conflict with the flow of evacuees away from the power plant. Highway Advisory Radio (HAR) can be used to broadcast information to evacuees en route through their vehicle stereo systems. Automated Traveler Information Systems (ATIS) can also be used to provide evacuees with information.

Internet websites can provide traffic and evacuation route information before the evacuee begins his trip, while on board navigation systems (GPS units), cell phones, and pagers can be used to provide information en route. These are only several examples of how ITS technologies can benefit the evacuation process. Consideration should be given that ITS technologies be used to facilitate the evacuation process, and any additional signage placed should consider evacuation needs.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 92 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

The ETE analysis treated all controlled intersections that are existing TCP locations in the offsite agency plans as being controlled by actuated signals.

Chapters 2N and 5G, and Part 6 of the 2009 MUTCD are particularly relevant and should be reviewed during emergency response training.

The ETE calculations reflect the assumption that all externalexternal trips are interdicted and diverted after 30 minutes have elapsed from the ATE.

All transit vehicles and other responders entering the EPZ to support the evacuation are assumed to be unhindered by personnel manning ACPs and TCPs.

Study Assumptions 5 and 6 in Section 2.3 discuss ACP and TCP staffing schedules and operations.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 93 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

10 EVACUATION ROUTES Evacuation routes are comprised of two distinct components:

• Routing from a PAZ being evacuated to the boundary of the Evacuation Region and thence out of the EPZ.

• Routing of transitdependent evacuees from the EPZ boundary to reception centers.

Evacuees will select routes within the EPZ in such a way as to minimize their exposure to risk.

This expectation is met by the DYNEV II model routing traffic away from the location of the plant, to the extent practicable. The DTRAD model satisfies this behavior by routing traffic so as to balance traffic demand relative to the available highway capacity to the extent possible.

See Appendices B through D for further discussion.

The routing of transitdependent evacuees from the EPZ boundary to reception centers is designed to minimize the amount of travel outside the EPZ, from the points where these routes cross the EPZ boundary.

Figure 101 presents a map showing the reception centers for evacuees. The major evacuation routes for the EPZ are presented in Figure 102.

It is assumed that all school evacuees will be taken to the appropriate reception center and subsequently picked up by parents or guardians. Transitdependent evacuees are transported to the nearest reception center for each county. This study does not consider the transport of evacuees from reception centers to congregate care centers, if the offsite agencies do make the decision to relocate evacuees.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 101 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 101. General Population and School Reception Centers San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 102 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure 102. Evacuation Routes San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 103 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

11 SURVEILLANCE OF EVACUATION OPERATIONS There is a need for surveillance of traffic operations during the evacuation. There is also a need to clear any blockage of roadways arising from accidents or vehicle disablement. Surveillance can take several forms.

1. Traffic control personnel, located at Traffic Control and Access Control points, provide fixedpoint surveillance.

2. Ground patrols may be undertaken along welldefined paths to ensure coverage of those highways that serve as major evacuation routes.

3. Aerial surveillance of evacuation operations may also be conducted using helicopter or fixedwing aircraft, if available.

4. Cellular phone calls (if cellular coverage exists) from motorists may also provide direct field reports of road blockages.

These concurrent surveillance procedures are designed to provide coverage of the entire EPZ as well as the area around its periphery. It is the responsibility of the offsite agencies to support an emergency response system that can receive messages from the field and be in a position to respond to any reported problems in a timely manner. This coverage should quickly identify, and expedite the response to any blockage caused by a disabled vehicle.

Tow Vehicles In a lowspeed traffic environment, any vehicle disablement is likely to arise due to a lowspeed collision, mechanical failure or the exhaustion of its fuel supply. In any case, the disabled vehicle can be pushed onto the shoulder, thereby restoring traffic flow. Past experience in other emergencies indicates that evacuees who are leaving an area often perform activities such as pushing a disabled vehicle to the side of the road without prompting.

While the need for tow vehicles is expected to be low under the circumstances described above, it is still prudent to be prepared for such a need. Consideration should be given that tow trucks with a supply of gasoline be deployed at strategic locations within, or just outside, the EPZ. These locations should be selected so that:

They permit access to key, heavily loaded, evacuation routes.

Responding tow trucks would most likely travel counterflow relative to evacuating traffic.

Consideration should also be given that the state and local emergency management agencies encourage gas stations to remain open during the evacuation.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 111 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

12 CONFIRMATION TIME It is necessary to confirm that the evacuation process is effective in the sense that the public is complying with the Advisory to Evacuate. The San Juan Capistrano Radiological Emergency Plan states that it is Standard Operating Procedure for Orange County to administer this process. In doing so they may employ any or all of the following methods:

Sirens and EAS message instructions.

Confirmation that preidentified special needs population have been notified/transported.

Visual check of Transportation Assembly Points (TAPs) to ensure that the populaces requiring public transportation assistance have been evacuated.

Vehicle (mobile) public address systems.

Publishing of Public Information hotline telephone number in EAS messages and news releases if special assistance is required.

Helicopter public address use (when available).

In the event of a manpower or equipment shortage, the following approach is suggested as an alternative.

The suggested procedure employs a stratified random sample and a telephone survey. The size of the sample is dependent on the expected number of households that do not comply with the Advisory to Evacuate. It is reasonable to assume for the purpose of estimating sample size that at least 80 percent of the population within the EPZ will comply with the Advisory to Evacuate.

We believe it is reasonable to assume, for the purpose of estimating sample size that at least 80 percent of the population within the EPZ will comply with the Advisory to Evacuate. On this basis, an analysis could be undertaken (see Table 121) to yield an estimated sample size of approximately 300.

The confirmation process should start at about 21/2 hours after the Advisory to Evacuate, which is when approximately 90 percent of evacuees have completed their mobilization activities (see Figure 54). At this time, virtually all evacuees will have departed on their respective trips and the local telephone system will be largely free of traffic.

As indicated in Table 121, approximately 71/2 person hours are needed to complete the telephone survey. If six people are assigned to this task, each dialing a different set of telephone exchanges (e.g., each person can be assigned a different set of PAZs), then the confirmation process will extend over a timeframe of about 75 minutes. Thus, the confirmation should be completed before the evacuated area is cleared. Of course, fewer people would be needed for this survey if the Evacuation Region were only a portion of the EPZ. Use of modern automated computer controlled dialing equipment or other technologies (e.g., reverse 911 or equivalent, if available) can significantly reduce the manpower requirements and the time required to undertake this type of confirmation survey.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 121 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

If this method is indeed used by the offsite agencies, consideration should be given to maintain a list of telephone numbers within the EPZ in the EOC at all times. Such a list could be purchased from vendors and could be periodically updated. As indicated above, the confirmation process should not begin until 21/2 hours after the Advisory to Evacuate, to ensure that households have had enough time to mobilize. This 21/2hour timeframe will enable telephone operators to arrive at their workplace, obtain a call list and prepare to make the necessary phone calls.

Should the number of telephone responses (i.e., people still at home) exceed 20 percent, then the telephone survey should be repeated after an hour's interval until the confirmation process is completed.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 122 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table 121. Estimated Number of Telephone Calls Required for Confirmation of Evacuation Problem Definition Estimate number of phone calls, n, needed to ascertain the proportion, F of households that have not evacuated.

Reference:

Burstein, H., Attribute Sampling, McGraw Hill, 1971 Given:

No. of households plus other facilities, N, within the EPZ (est.) = 59,000 Est. proportion, F, of households that will not evacuate = 0.20 Allowable error margin, e: 0.05 Confidence level, : 0.95 (implies A = 1.96)

Applying Table 10 of cited reference, 0.25; 1 0.75 308 Finite population correction:

307 1

Thus, some 300 telephone calls will confirm that approximately 20 percent of the population has not evacuated. If only 10 percent of the population does not comply with the Advisory to Evacuate, then the required sample size, nF = 215.

Est. Person Hours to complete 300 telephone calls Assume:

Time to dial using touch tone (random selection of listed numbers): 30 seconds Time for 6 rings (no answer): 36 seconds Time for 4 rings plus short conversation: 60 sec.

Interval between calls: 20 sec.

Person Hours:

300 30 0.8 36 0.2 60 20 7.6 3600 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station 123 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX A Glossary of Traffic Engineering Terms

A. GLOSSARY OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TERMS Table A1. Glossary of Traffic Engineering Terms Term Definition Analysis Network A graphical representation of the geometric topology of a physical roadway system, which is comprised of directional links and nodes.

Link A network link represents a specific, onedirectional section of roadway. A link has both physical (length, number of lanes, topology, etc.) and operational (turn movement percentages, service rate, freeflow speed) characteristics.

Measures of Effectiveness Statistics describing traffic operations on a roadway network.

Node A network node generally represents an intersection of network links. A node has control characteristics, i.e., the allocation of service time to each approach link.

Origin A location attached to a network link, within the EPZ or Shadow Region, where trips are generated at a specified rate in vehicles per hour (vph). These trips enter the roadway system to travel to their respective destinations.

Prevailing Roadway and Relates to the physical features of the roadway, the nature (e.g.,

Traffic Conditions composition) of traffic on the roadway and the ambient conditions (weather, visibility, pavement conditions, etc.).

Service Rate Maximum rate at which vehicles, executing a specific turn maneuver, can be discharged from a section of roadway at the prevailing conditions, expressed in vehicles per second (vps) or vehicles per hour (vph).

Service Volume Maximum number of vehicles which can pass over a section of roadway in one direction during a specified time period with operating conditions at a specified Level of Service (The Service Volume at the upper bound of Level of Service, E, equals Capacity).

Service Volume is usually expressed as vehicles per hour (vph).

Signal Cycle Length The total elapsed time to display all signal indications, in sequence.

The cycle length is expressed in seconds.

Signal Interval A single combination of signal indications. The interval duration is expressed in seconds. A signal phase is comprised of a sequence of signal intervals, usually green, yellow, red.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station A1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Term Definition Signal Phase A set of signal indications (and intervals) which services a particular combination of traffic movements on selected approaches to the intersection. The phase duration is expressed in seconds.

Traffic (Trip) Assignment A process of assigning traffic to paths of travel in such a way as to satisfy all trip objectives (i.e., the desire of each vehicle to travel from a specified origin in the network to a specified destination) and to optimize some stated objective or combination of objectives. In general, the objective is stated in terms of minimizing a generalized "cost". For example, "cost" may be expressed in terms of travel time.

Traffic Density The number of vehicles that occupy one lane of a roadway section of specified length at a point in time, expressed as vehicles per mile (vpm).

Traffic (Trip) Distribution A process for determining the destinations of all traffic generated at the origins. The result often takes the form of a Trip Table, which is a matrix of origindestination traffic volumes.

Traffic Simulation A computer model designed to replicate the realworld operation of vehicles on a roadway network, so as to provide statistics describing traffic performance. These statistics are called Measures of Effectiveness.

Traffic Volume The number of vehicles that pass over a section of roadway in one direction, expressed in vehicles per hour (vph). Where applicable, traffic volume may be stratified by turn movement.

Travel Mode Distinguishes between private auto, bus, rail, pedestrian and air travel modes.

Trip Table or Origin A rectangular matrix or table, whose entries contain the number Destination Matrix of trips generated at each specified origin, during a specified time period, that are attracted to (and travel toward) each of its specified destinations. These values are expressed in vehicles per hour (vph) or in vehicles.

Turning Capacity The capacity associated with that component of the traffic stream which executes a specified turn maneuver from an approach at an intersection.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station A2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX B DTRAD: Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Distribution Model

B. DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT AND DISTRIBUTION MODEL This section describes the integrated dynamic trip assignment and distribution model named DTRAD (Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Distribution) that is expressly designed for use in analyzing evacuation scenarios. DTRAD employs logitbased pathchoice principles and is one of the models of the DYNEVII System. The DTRAD module implements pathbased Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) so that time dependent OriginDestination (OD) trips are assigned to routes over the network based on prevailing traffic conditions.

To apply the DYNEV II System, the analyst must specify the highway network, link capacity information, the timevarying volume of traffic generated at all origin centroids and, optionally, a set of accessible candidate destination nodes on the periphery of the EPZ for selected origins.

DTRAD calculates the optimal dynamic trip distribution (i.e., trip destinations) and the optimal dynamic trip assignment (i.e., trip routing) of the traffic generated at each origin node traveling to its set of candidate destination nodes, so as to minimize evacuee travel cost.

Overview of Integrated Distribution and Assignment Model The underlying premise is that the selection of destinations and routes is intrinsically coupled in an evacuation scenario. That is, people in vehicles seek to travel out of an area of potential risk as rapidly as possible by selecting the best routes. The model is designed to identify these best routes in a manner that realistically distributes vehicles from origins to destinations and routes them over the highway network, in a consistent and optimal manner, reflecting evacuee behavior.

For each origin, a set of candidate destination nodes is selected by the software logic and by the analyst to reflect the desire by evacuees to travel away from the power plant and to access major highways. The specific destination nodes within this set that are selected by travelers and the selection of the connecting paths of travel, are both determined by DTRAD. This determination is made by a logitbased path choice model in DTRAD, so as to minimize the trip cost, as discussed later.

The traffic loading on the network and the consequent operational traffic environment of the network (density, speed, throughput on each link) vary over time as the evacuation takes place.

The DTRAD model, which is interfaced with the DYNEV simulation model, executes a succession of sessions wherein it computes the optimal routing and selection of destination nodes for the conditions that exist at that time.

Interfacing the DYNEV Simulation Model with DTRAD The DYNEV II system reflects NRC guidance that evacuees will seek to travel in a general direction away from the location of the hazardous event. An algorithm was developed to support the DTRAD model in dynamically varying the Trip Table (OD matrix) over time from one DTRAD session to the next. Another algorithm executes a mapping from the specified geometric network (linknode analysis network) that represents the physical highway system, to a path network that represents the vehicle [turn] movements. DTRAD computations are performed on the path network: DYNEV simulation model, on the geometric network.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station B1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

DTRAD Description DTRAD is the DTA module for the DYNEV II System.

When the road network under study is large, multiple routing options are usually available between trip origins and destinations. The problem of loading traffic demands and propagating them over the network links is called Network Loading and is addressed by DYNEVII using macroscopic traffic simulation modeling. Traffic assignment deals with computing the distribution of the traffic over the road network for given OD demands and is a model of the route choice of the drivers. Travel demand changes significantly over time, and the road network may have time dependent characteristics, e.g., timevarying signal timing or reduced road capacity because of lane closure, or traffic congestion. To consider these time dependencies, DTA procedures are required.

The DTRAD DTA module represents the dynamic route choice behavior of drivers, using the specification of dynamic origindestination matrices as flow input. Drivers choose their routes through the network based on the travel cost they experience (as determined by the simulation model). This allows traffic to be distributed over the network according to the timedependent conditions. The modeling principles of DTRAD include:

It is assumed that drivers not only select the best route (i.e., lowest cost path) but some also select less attractive routes. The algorithm implemented by DTRAD archives several efficient routes for each OD pair from which the drivers choose.

The choice of one route out of a set of possible routes is an outcome of discrete choice modeling. Given a set of routes and their generalized costs, the percentages of drivers that choose each route is computed. The most prevalent model for discrete choice modeling is the logit model. DTRAD uses a variant of PathSizeLogit model (PSL). PSL overcomes the drawback of the traditional multinomial logit model by incorporating an additional deterministic path size correction term to address path overlapping in the random utility expression.

DTRAD executes the TA algorithm on an abstract network representation called "the path network" which is built from the actual physical linknode analysis network. This execution continues until a stable situation is reached: the volumes and travel times on the edges of the path network do not change significantly from one iteration to the next. The criteria for this convergence are defined by the user.

Travel cost plays a crucial role in route choice. In DTRAD, path cost is a linear summation of the generalized cost of each link that comprises the path. The generalized cost for a link, a, is expressed as ca ta la sa ,

where ca is the generalized cost for link a, and , , and are cost coefficients for link travel time, distance, and supplemental cost, respectively. Distance and supplemental costs are defined as invariant properties of the network model, while travel time is a dynamic property dictated by prevailing traffic conditions. The DYNEV simulation model San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station B2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

computes travel times on all edges in the network and DTRAD uses that information to constantly update the costs of paths. The route choice decision model in the next simulation iteration uses these updated values to adjust the route choice behavior. This way, traffic demands are dynamically reassigned based on time dependent conditions.

The interaction between the DTRAD traffic assignment and DYNEV II simulation models is depicted in Figure B1. Each round of interaction is called a Traffic Assignment Session (TA session). A TA session is composed of multiple iterations, marked as loop B in the figure.

The supplemental cost is based on the survival distribution (a variation of the exponential distribution).The Inverse Survival Function is a cost term in DTRAD to represent the potential risk of travel toward the plant:

sa = ln (p), 0 p l ; 0 p=

dn = Distance of node, n, from the plant d0 =Distance from the plant where there is zero risk

= Scaling factor The value of do = 15 miles, the outer distance of the shadow region. Note that the supplemental cost, sa, of link, a, is (high, low), if its downstream node, n, is (near, far from) the power plant.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station B3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Network Equilibrium In 1952, John Wardrop wrote:

Under equilibrium conditions traffic arranges itself in congested networks in such a way that no individual tripmaker can reduce his path costs by switching routes.

The above statement describes the User Equilibrium definition, also called the Selfish Driver Equilibrium. It is a hypothesis that represents a [hopeful] condition that evolves over time as drivers search out alternative routes to identify those routes that minimize their respective costs. It has been found that this equilibrium objective to minimize costs is largely realized by most drivers who routinely take the same trip over the same network at the same time (i.e.,

commuters). Effectively, such drivers learn which routes are best for them over time. Thus, the traffic environment settles down to a nearequilibrium state.

Clearly, since an emergency evacuation is a sudden, unique event, it does not constitute a long term learning experience which can achieve an equilibrium state. Consequently, DTRAD was not designed as an equilibrium solution, but to represent drivers in a new and unfamiliar situation, who respond in a flexible manner to realtime information (either broadcast or observed) in such a way as to minimize their respective costs of travel.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station B4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Start of next DTRAD Session A

Set T0 Clock time.

Archive System State at T0 Define latest Link Turn Percentages Execute Simulation Model from B time, T0 to T1 (burn time)

Provide DTRAD with link MOE at time, T1 Execute DTRAD iteration; Get new Turn Percentages Retrieve System State at T0 ;

Apply new Link Turn Percents DTRAD iteration converges?

No Yes Next iteration Simulate from T0 to T2 (DTA session duration)

Set Clock to T2 B A Figure B1. Flow Diagram of SimulationDTRAD Interface San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station B5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX C DYNEV Traffic Simulation Model

C. DYNEV TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODEL The DYNEV traffic simulation model is a macroscopic model that describes the operations of traffic flow in terms of aggregate variables: vehicles, flow rate, mean speed, volume, density, queue length, on each link, for each turn movement, during each Time Interval (simulation time step). The model generates trips from sources and from Entry Links and introduces them onto the analysis network at rates specified by the analyst based on the mobilization time distributions. The model simulates the movements of all vehicles on all network links over time until the network is empty. At intervals, the model outputs Measures of Effectiveness (MOE) such as those listed in Table C1.

Model Features Include:

Explicit consideration is taken of the variation in density over the time step; an iterative procedure is employed to calculate an average density over the simulation time step for the purpose of computing a mean speed for moving vehicles.

Multiple turn movements can be serviced on one link; a separate algorithm is used to estimate the number of (fractional) lanes assigned to the vehicles performing each turn movement, based, in part, on the turn percentages provided by the DTRAD model.

At any point in time, traffic flow on a link is subdivided into two classifications: queued and moving vehicles. The number of vehicles in each classification is computed. Vehicle spillback, stratified by turn movement for each network link, is explicitly considered and quantified. The propagation of stopping waves from link to link is computed within each time step of the simulation. There is no vertical stacking of queues on a link.

Any link can accommodate source flow from zones via side streets and parking facilities that are not explicitly represented. This flow represents the evacuating trips that are generated at the source.

The relation between the number of vehicles occupying the link and its storage capacity is monitored every time step for every link and for every turn movement. If the available storage capacity on a link is exceeded by the demand for service, then the simulator applies a metering rate to the entering traffic from both the upstream feeders and source node to ensure that the available storage capacity is not exceeded.

A path network that represents the specified traffic movements from each network link is constructed by the model; this path network is utilized by the DTRAD model.

A twoway interface with DTRAD: (1) provides link travel times; (2) receives data that translates into link turn percentages.

Provides MOE to animation software, EVAN Calculates ETE statistics San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

All traffic simulation models are dataintensive. Table C2 outlines the necessary input data elements.

To provide an efficient framework for defining these specifications, the physical highway environment is represented as a network. The unidirectional links of the network represent roadway sections: rural, multilane, urban streets or freeways. The nodes of the network generally represent intersections or points along a section where a geometric property changes (e.g. a lane drop, change in grade or free flow speed).

Figure C1 is an example of a small network representation. The freeway is defined by the sequence of links, (20,21), (21,22), and (22,23). Links (8001, 19) and (3, 8011) are Entry and Exit links, respectively. An arterial extends from node 3 to node 19 and is partially subsumed within a grid network. Note that links (21,22) and (17,19) are gradeseparated.

Table C1. Selected Measures of Effectiveness Output by DYNEV II Measure Units Applies To Vehicles Discharged Vehicles Link, Network, Exit Link Speed Miles/Hours (mph) Link, Network Density Vehicles/Mile/Lane Link Level of Service LOS Link Content Vehicles Network Travel Time Vehiclehours Network Evacuated Vehicles Vehicles Network, Exit Link Trip Travel Time Vehicleminutes/trip Network Capacity Utilization Percent Exit Link Attraction Percent of total evacuating vehicles Exit Link Max Queue Vehicles Node, Approach Time of Max Queue Hours:minutes Node, Approach Length (mi); Mean Speed (mph); Travel Route Statistics Route Time (min)

Mean Travel Time Minutes Evacuation Trips; Network San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table C2. Input Requirements for the DYNEV II Model HIGHWAY NETWORK Links defined by upstream and downstream node numbers Link lengths Number of lanes (up to 9) and channelization Turn bays (1 to 3 lanes)

Destination (exit) nodes Network topology defined in terms of downstream nodes for each receiving link Node Coordinates (X,Y)

Nuclear Power Plant Coordinates (X,Y)

GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES On all entry links and source nodes (origins), by Time Period TRAFFIC CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS Traffic signals: linkspecific, turn movement specific Signal control treated as fixed time or actuated Location of traffic control points (these are represented as actuated signals)

Stop and Yield signs Rightturnonred (RTOR)

Route diversion specifications Turn restrictions Lane control (e.g. lane closure, movementspecific)

DRIVERS AND OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS Drivers (vehiclespecific) response mechanisms: freeflow speed, discharge headway Bus route designation.

DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Candidate destination nodes for each origin (optional)

Duration of DTA sessions Duration of simulation burn time Desired number of destination nodes per origin INCIDENTS Identify and Schedule of closed lanes Identify and Schedule of closed links San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

8011 8009 2 3 8104 8107 6 5 8008 8010 8 9 10 8007 8012 12 11 8006 8005 13 14 8014 15 25 8004 16 24 8024 17 8003 23 22 21 20 8002 Entry, Exit Nodes are 19 numbered 8xxx 8001 Figure C1. Representative Analysis Network San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

C.1 Methodology C.1.1 The Fundamental Diagram It is necessary to define the fundamental diagram describing flowdensity and speeddensity relationships. Rather than settling for a triangular representation, a more realistic representation that includes a capacity drop, (IR)Qmax, at the critical density when flow conditions enter the forced flow regime, is developed and calibrated for each link. This representation, shown in Figure C2, asserts a constant free speed up to a density, k , and then a linear reduction in speed in the range, k k k 45 vpm, the density at capacity. In the flowdensity plane, a quadratic relationship is prescribed in the range, k k 95 vpm which roughly represents the stopandgo condition of severe congestion. The value of flow rate, Q , corresponding to k , is approximated at 0.7 RQ . A linear relationship between k and k completes the diagram shown in Figure C2. Table C3 is a glossary of terms.

The fundamental diagram is applied to moving traffic on every link. The specified calibration values for each link are: (1) Free speed, v ; (2) Capacity, Q  ; (3) Critical density, k 45 vpm ; (4) Capacity Drop Factor, R = 0.9 ; (5) Jam density, k . Then, v , k k

. Setting k k k , then Q RQ k for 0 k k 50 . It can be shown that Q 0.98 0.0056 k RQ for k k k , where k 50 and k 175.

C.1.2 The Simulation Model The simulation model solves a sequence of unit problems. Each unit problem computes the movement of traffic on a link, for each specified turn movement, over a specified time interval (TI) which serves as the simulation time step for all links. Figure C3 is a representation of the unit problem in the timedistance plane. Table C3 is a glossary of terms that are referenced in the following description of the unit problem procedure.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Volume, vph Capacity Drop Qmax R Qmax Qs Density, vpm Flow Regimes Speed, mph Free Forced vf R vc Density, vpm kf kc kj ks Figure C2. Fundamental Diagrams San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Distance OQ OM OE Down Qb vQ Qe v

v L

Mb Me Up t1 t2 Time E1 E2 TI Figure C3. A UNIT Problem Configuration with t1 > 0 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table C3. Glossary The maximum number of vehicles, of a particular movement, that can discharge Cap from a link within a time interval.

The number of vehicles, of a particular movement, that enter the link over the E

time interval. The portion, ETI, can reach the stopbar within the TI.

The green time: cycle time ratio that services the vehicles of a particular turn G/C movement on a link.

h The mean queue discharge headway, seconds.

k Density in vehicles per lane per mile.

The average density of moving vehicles of a particular movement over a TI, on a k

link.

L The length of the link in feet.

The queue length in feet of a particular movement, at the [beginning, end] of a L ,L time interval.

The number of lanes, expressed as a floating point number, allocated to service a LN particular movement on a link.

L The mean effective length of a queued vehicle including the vehicle spacing, feet.

M Metering factor (Multiplier): 1.

The number of moving vehicles on the link, of a particular movement, that are M ,M moving at the [beginning, end] of the time interval. These vehicles are assumed to be of equal spacing, over the length of link upstream of the queue.

The total number of vehicles of a particular movement that are discharged from a O

link over a time interval.

The components of the vehicles of a particular movement that are discharged from a link within a time interval: vehicles that were Queued at the beginning of O ,O ,O the TI; vehicles that were Moving within the link at the beginning of the TI; vehicles that Entered the link during the TI.

The percentage, expressed as a fraction, of the total flow on the link that P

executes a particular turn movement, x.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

The number of queued vehicles on the link, of a particular turn movement, at the Q ,Q

[beginning, end] of the time interval.

The maximum flow rate that can be serviced by a link for a particular movement Q in the absence of a control device. It is specified by the analyst as an estimate of link capacity, based upon a field survey, with reference to the HCM.

R The factor that is applied to the capacity of a link to represent the capacity drop when the flow condition moves into the forced flow regime. The lower capacity at that point is equal to RQ .

RCap The remaining capacity available to service vehicles of a particular movement after that queue has been completely serviced, within a time interval, expressed as vehicles.

S Service rate for movement x, vehicles per hour (vph).

t Vehicles of a particular turn movement that enter a link over the first t seconds of a time interval, can reach the stopbar (in the absence of a queue down stream) within the same time interval.

TI The time interval, in seconds, which is used as the simulation time step.

v The mean speed of travel, in feet per second (fps) or miles per hour (mph), of moving vehicles on the link.

v The mean speed of the last vehicle in a queue that discharges from the link within the TI. This speed differs from the mean speed of moving vehicles, v.

W The width of the intersection in feet. This is the difference between the link length which extends from stopbar to stopbar and the block length.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

The formulation and the associated logic presented below are designed to solve the unit problem for each sweep over the network (discussed below), for each turn movement serviced on each link that comprises the evacuation network, and for each TI over the duration of the evacuation.

Given Q , M , L , TI , E , LN , G C , h , L , R , L , E , M Compute O , Q , M Define O O O O ; E E E

1. For the first sweep, s = 1, of this TI, get initial estimates of mean density, k , the R - factor, R and entering traffic, E , using the values computed for the final sweep of the prior TI.

For each subsequent sweep, s 1 , calculate E P O S where P , O are the relevant turn percentages from feeder link, i , and its total outflow (possibly metered) over this TI; S is the total source flow (possibly metered) during the current TI.

Set iteration counter, n = 0, k k , and E E .

2. Calculate v k such that k 130 using the analytical representations of the fundamental diagram.

Q TI G Calculate Cap 3600 C LN , in vehicles, this value may be reduced due to metering Set R 1.0 if G C 1 or if k k ; Set R 0.9 only if G C 1 and k k L

Calculate queue length, L Q LN

3. Calculate t TI . If t 0 , set t E O 0 ; Else, E E .

4. Then E E E ; t TI t

5. If Q Cap , then O Cap , O O 0 If t 0 , then Q Q M E Cap Else Q Q Cap End if Calculate Q and M using Algorithm A below

6. Else Q Cap O Q , RCap Cap O

7. If M RCap , then San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

t Cap

8. If t 0, O M ,O min RCap M , 0 TI Q E O If Q 0 , then Calculate Q , M with Algorithm A Else Q 0, M E End if Else t 0 O M and O 0 M M O E; Q 0 End if

9. Else M O 0 If t 0 , then O RCap , Q M O E Calculate Q and M using Algorithm A

10. Else t 0 M M If M ,

O RCap Q M O Apply Algorithm A to calculate Q and M Else O M M M O E and Q 0 End if End if End if End if

11. Calculate a new estimate of average density, k k 2k k ,

where k = density at the beginning of the TI k = density at the end of the TI k = density at the midpoint of the TI All values of density apply only to the moving vehicles.

If k k and n N where N max number of iterations, and is a convergence criterion, then San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

12. set n n 1 , and return to step 2 to perform iteration, n, using k k .

End if Computation of unit problem is now complete. Check for excessive inflow causing spillback.

13. If Q M , then The number of excess vehicles that cause spillback is: SB Q M ,

where W is the width of the upstream intersection. To prevent spillback, meter the outflow from the feeder approaches and from the source flow, S, during this TI by the amount, SB. That is, set SB M 1 0 , where M is the metering factor over all movements .

E S This metering factor is assigned appropriately to all feeder links and to the source flow, to be applied during the next network sweep, discussed later.

Algorithm A This analysis addresses the flow environment over a TI during which moving vehicles can join a standing or discharging queue. For the case Qb vQ shown, Q Cap, with t 0 and a queue of Qe Qe length, Q , formed by that portion of M and E that reaches the stopbar within the TI, but could v not discharge due to inadequate capacity. That is, Mb Q M E . This queue length, v Q Q M E Cap can be extended to Q L3 by traffic entering the approach during the current TI, traveling at speed, v, and reaching the rear of the t1 t3 queue within the TI. A portion of the entering TI vehicles, E E , will likely join the queue. This analysis calculates t , Q and M for the input values of L, TI, v, E, t, L , LN, Q .

When t 0 and Q Cap:

L L Define: L Q . From the sketch, L v TI t t L Q E .

LN LN Substituting E E yields: vt E L v TI t L . Recognizing that the first two terms on the right hand side cancel, solve for t to obtain:

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

L t such that 0 t TI t E L v

TI LN If the denominator, v 0, set t TI t .

t t t Then, Q Q E , M E 1 TI TI The complete Algorithm A considers all flow scenarios; space limitation precludes its inclusion, here.

C.1.3 Lane Assignment The unit problem is solved for each turn movement on each link. Therefore it is necessary to calculate a value, LN , of allocated lanes for each movement, x. If in fact all lanes are specified by, say, arrows painted on the pavement, either as full lanes or as lanes within a turn bay, then the problem is fully defined. If however there remain unchannelized lanes on a link, then an analysis is undertaken to subdivide the number of these physical lanes into turn movement specific virtual lanes, LNx.

C.2 Implementation C.2.1 Computational Procedure The computational procedure for this model is shown in the form of a flow diagram as Figure C4. As discussed earlier, the simulation model processes traffic flow for each link independently over TI that the analyst specifies; it is usually 60 seconds or longer. The first step is to execute an algorithm to define the sequence in which the network links are processed so that as many links as possible are processed after their feeder links are processed, within the same network sweep. Since a general network will have many closed loops, it is not possible to guarantee that every link processed will have all of its feeder links processed earlier.

The processing then continues as a succession of time steps of duration, TI, until the simulation is completed. Within each time step, the processing performs a series of sweeps over all network links; this is necessary to ensure that the traffic flow is synchronous over the entire network. Specifically, the sweep ensures continuity of flow among all the network links; in the context of this model, this means that the values of E, M, and S are all defined for each link such that they represent the synchronous movement of traffic from each link to all of its outbound links. These sweeps also serve to compute the metering rates that control spillback.

Within each sweep, processing solves the unit problem for each turn movement on each link.

With the turn movement percentages for each link provided by the DTRAD model, an algorithm San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

allocates the number of lanes to each movement serviced on each link. The timing at a signal, if any, applied at the downstream end of the link, is expressed as a G/C ratio, the signal timing needed to define this ratio is an input requirement for the model. The model also has the capability of representing, with macroscopic fidelity, the actions of actuated signals responding to the timevarying competing demands on the approaches to the intersection.

The solution of the unit problem yields the values of the number of vehicles, O, that discharge from the link over the time interval and the number of vehicles that remain on the link at the end of the time interval as stratified by queued and moving vehicles: Q and M . The procedure considers each movement separately (multipiping). After all network links are processed for a given network sweep, the updated consistent values of entering flows, E; metering rates, M; and source flows, S are defined so as to satisfy the no spillback condition.

The procedure then performs the unit problem solutions for all network links during the following sweep.

Experience has shown that the system converges (i.e. the values of E, M and S settle down for all network links) in just two sweeps if the network is entirely undersaturated or in four sweeps in the presence of extensive congestion with link spillback. (The initial sweep over each link uses the final values of E and M, of the prior TI). At the completion of the final sweep for a TI, the procedure computes and stores all measures of effectiveness for each link and turn movement for output purposes. It then prepares for the following time interval by defining the values of Q and M for the start of the next TI as being those values of Q and M at the end of the prior TI. In this manner, the simulation model processes the traffic flow over time until the end of the run. Note that there is no spacediscretization other than the specification of network links.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Sequence Network Links Next Timestep, of duration, TI A

Next sweep; Define E, M, S for all B

Links C Next Link D Next Turn Movement, x Get lanes, LNx Service Rate, Sx ; G/Cx Get inputs to Unit Problem:

Q b , Mb , E Solve Unit Problem: Q e , Me , O No D Last Movement ?

Yes No Last Link ? C Yes No B Last Sweep ?

Yes Calc., store all Link MOE Set up next TI :

No A Last Time - step ?

Yes DONE Figure C4. Flow of Simulation Processing (See Glossary: Table C3)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

C.2.2 Interfacing with Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTRAD)

The DYNEV II system reflects NRC guidance that evacuees will seek to travel in a general direction away from the location of the hazardous event. Thus, an algorithm was developed to identify an appropriate set of destination nodes for each origin based on its location and on the expected direction of travel. This algorithm also supports the DTRAD model in dynamically varying the Trip Table (OD matrix) over time from one DTRAD session to the next.

Figure B1 depicts the interaction of the simulation model with the DTRAD model in the DYNEV II system. As indicated, DYNEV II performs a succession of DTRAD sessions; each such session computes the turn link percentages for each link that remain constant for the session duration, T , T , specified by the analyst. The end product is the assignment of traffic volumes from each origin to paths connecting it with its destinations in such a way as to minimize the networkwide cost function. The output of the DTRAD model is a set of updated link turn percentages which represent this assignment of traffic.

As indicated in Figure B1, the simulation model supports the DTRAD session by providing it with operational link MOE that are needed by the path choice model and included in the DTRAD cost function. These MOE represent the operational state of the network at a time, T T , which lies within the session duration, T , T . This burn time, T T , is selected by the analyst. For each DTRAD iteration, the simulation model computes the change in network operations over this burn time using the latest set of link turn percentages computed by the DTRAD model. Upon convergence of the DTRAD iterative procedure, the simulation model accepts the latest turn percentages provided by the DTA model, returns to the origin time, T , and executes until it arrives at the end of the DTRAD session duration at time, T . At this time the next DTA session is launched and the whole process repeats until the end of the DYNEV II run.

Additional details are presented in Appendix B.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station C16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX D Detailed Description of Study Procedure

D. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STUDY PROCEDURE This appendix describes the activities that were performed to compute Evacuation Time Estimates. The individual steps of this effort are represented as a flow diagram in Figure D1.

Each numbered step in the description that follows corresponds to the numbered element in the flow diagram.

Step 1 The first activity was to obtain EPZ boundary information and create a GIS base map. The base map extends beyond the Shadow Region which extends approximately 15 miles (radially) from the power plant location. The base map incorporates the local roadway topology, a suitable topographic background and the EPZ boundary.

Step 2 2010 Census block information was obtained in GIS format. This information was used to estimate the resident population within the EPZ and Shadow Region, seasonal residents, and to define the spatial distribution and demographic characteristics of the population within the study area. Employee data were estimated using the U.S. Census Bureaus Longitudinal EmployerHousehold Dynamics interactive website1. Transient data were obtained from local/state emergency management agencies and from phone calls to transient attractions.

Information concerning schools, medical and other types of special facilities within the EPZ was obtained from county and municipal sources, augmented by telephone contacts with the identified facilities. Population and special facility data within MCB were provided by MCB.

Step 3 A kickoff meeting was conducted with major stakeholders (state and local emergency managers, onsite and offsite utility emergency managers, local and state agencies). The purpose of the kickoff meeting was to present an overview of the work effort, identify key agency personnel, and indicate the data requirements for the study. Specific requests for information were presented to local emergency managers. Unique features of the study area were discussed to identify the local concerns that should be addressed by the ETE study.

Step 4 Next, a physical survey of the roadway system in the study area was conducted to determine the geometric properties of the highway sections, the channelization of lanes on each section of roadway, whether there are any turn restrictions or special treatment of traffic at intersections, the type and functioning of traffic control devices, gathering signal timings for pretimed traffic signals, and to make the necessary observations needed to estimate realistic values of roadway capacity.

1 http://lehdmap.did.census.gov/

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station D1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Step 5 A telephone survey of households within the EPZ was conducted to identify household dynamics, trip generation characteristics, and evacuationrelated demographic information of the EPZ population. This information was used to determine important study factors including the average number of evacuating vehicles used by each household, and the time required to perform preevacuation mobilization activities.

Step 6 A computerized representation of the physical roadway system, called a linknode analysis network, was developed using the UNITES software developed by KLD. Once the geometry of the network was completed, the network was calibrated using the information gathered during the road survey (Step 4). Estimates of highway capacity for each link and other linkspecific characteristics were introduced to the network description. Traffic signal timings were input accordingly. The linknode analysis network was imported into a GIS map. 2010 Census data were overlaid in the map, and origin centroids where trips would be generated during the evacuation process were assigned to appropriate links.

Step 7 The EPZ is subdivided into 5 PAZs. Based on wind direction and speed, Regions (groupings of PAZs) that may be advised to evacuate, were developed.

The need for evacuation can occur over a range of timeofday, dayofweek, seasonal and weatherrelated conditions. Scenarios were developed to capture the variation in evacuation demand, highway capacity and mobilization time, for different time of day, day of the week, time of year, and weather conditions.

Step 8 The input stream for the DYNEV II model, which integrates the dynamic traffic assignment and distribution model, DTRAD, with the evacuation simulation model, was created for a prototype evacuation case - the evacuation of the entire EPZ for a representative scenario.

Step 9 After creating this input stream, the DYNEV II System was executed on the prototype evacuation case to compute evacuating traffic routing patterns consistent with the appropriate NRC guidelines. DYNEV II contains an extensive suite of data diagnostics which check the completeness and consistency of the input data specified. The analyst reviews all warning and error messages produced by the model and then corrects the database to create an input stream that properly executes to completion.

The model assigns destinations to all origin centroids consistent with a (general) radial evacuation of the EPZ and Shadow Region. The analyst may optionally supplement and/or replace these modelassigned destinations, based on professional judgment, after studying the topology of the analysis highway network. The model produces link and networkwide measures of effectiveness as well as estimates of evacuation time.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station D2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Step 10 The results generated by the prototype evacuation case are critically examined. The examination includes observing the animated graphics (using the EVAN software which operates on data produced by DYNEV II) and reviewing the statistics output by the model. This is a laborintensive activity, requiring the direct participation of skilled engineers who possess the necessary practical experience to interpret the results and to determine the causes of any problems reflected in the results.

Essentially, the approach is to identify those bottlenecks in the network that represent locations where congested conditions are pronounced and to identify the cause of this congestion. This cause can take many forms, either as excess demand due to high rates of trip generation, improper routing, a shortfall of capacity, or as a quantitative flaw in the way the physical system was represented in the input stream. This examination leads to one of two conclusions:

The results are satisfactory; or The input stream must be modified accordingly.

This decision requires, of course, the application of the user's judgment and experience based upon the results obtained in previous applications of the model and a comparison of the results of the latest prototype evacuation case iteration with the previous ones. If the results are satisfactory in the opinion of the user, then the process continues with Step 13. Otherwise, proceed to Step 11.

Step 11 There are many "treatments" available to the user in resolving apparent problems. These treatments range from decisions to reroute the traffic by assigning additional evacuation destinations for one or more sources, imposing turn restrictions where they can produce significant improvements in capacity, changing the control treatment at critical intersections so as to provide improved service for one or more movements, or in prescribing specific treatments for channelizing the flow so as to expedite the movement of traffic along major roadway systems. Such "treatments" take the form of modifications to the original prototype evacuation case input stream. All treatments are designed to improve the representation of evacuation behavior.

Step 12 As noted above, the changes to the input stream must be implemented to reflect the modifications undertaken in Step 11. At the completion of this activity, the process returns to Step 9 where the DYNEV II System is again executed.

Step 13 Evacuation of transitdependent evacuees and special facilities are included in the evacuation analysis. Fixed routing for transit buses and for school buses, ambulances, and other transit vehicles are introduced into the final prototype evacuation case data set. DYNEV II generates San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station D3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

routespecific speeds over time for use in the estimation of evacuation times for the transit dependent and special facility population groups.

Step 14 The prototype evacuation case was used as the basis for generating all region and scenario specific evacuation cases to be simulated. This process was automated through the UNITES user interface. For each specific case, the population to be evacuated, the trip generation distributions, the highway capacity and speeds, and other factors are adjusted to produce a customized casespecific data set.

Step 15 All evacuation cases are executed using the DYNEV II System to compute ETE. Once results were available, quality control procedures were used to assure the results were consistent, dynamic routing was reasonable, and traffic congestion/bottlenecks were addressed properly.

Step 16 Once vehicular evacuation results are accepted, average travel speeds for transit and special facility routes were used to compute evacuation time estimates for transitdependent permanent residents, schools, hospitals, and other special facilities.

Step 17 The simulation results are analyzed, tabulated and graphed. The results were then documented, as required by NUREG/CR7002.

Step 18 Following the completion of documentation activities, the ETE criteria checklist (see Appendix N) was completed. An appropriate report reference is provided for each criterion provided in the checklist.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station D4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

A Step 1 Step 10 Create GIS Base Map Examine Results of Prototype Evacuation Case using EVAN and DYNEV II Output Step 2 Gather Census Block and Demographic Data for Results Satisfactory Study Area Step 11 Step 3 Modify Evacuation Destinations and/or Develop Conduct Kickoff Meeting with Stakeholders Traffic Control Treatments Step 4 Step 12 Field Survey of Roadways within Study Area Modify Database to Reflect Changes to Prototype Evacuation Case Step 5 Conduct Telephone Survey and Develop Trip Generation Characteristics B

Step 13 Step 6 Establish Transit and Special Facility Evacuation Create and Calibrate LinkNode Analysis Network Routes and Update DYNEV II Database Step 14 Step 7 Generate DYNEV II Input Streams for All Evacuation Cases Develop Evacuation Regions and Scenarios Step 15 Step 8 Execute DYNEV II to Compute ETE for All Create and Debug DYNEV II Input Stream Evacuation Cases Step 16 Step 9 Use DYNEV II Average Speed Output to Compute ETE for Transit and Special Facility Routes B Execute DYNEV II for Prototype Evacuation Case Step 17 Documentation A Step 18 Complete ETE Criteria Checklist Figure D1. Flow Diagram of Activities San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station D5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX E Special Facility Data

E. SPECIAL FACILITY DATA The following tables list population information, as of 2012, for special facilities that are located within the SONGS EPZ. Special facilities are defined as schools, preschools, day care centers, hospitals and other medical care facilities. Transient population data is included in the tables for recreational areas and lodging facilities. Employment data is included in the tables for major employers. Each table is grouped by county. The location of each facility is defined by its straightline distance (miles) and direction (magnetic bearing) from the center point of the plant. Maps of each school, preschool, day care center, recreational area, and lodging facility are also provided.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table E1. Schools within the EPZ Distance Dire PAZ (miles) ction School Name Street Address Municipality Phone Enrollment Orange County 4 7.9 NW Bernice Ayer Middle School 1271 Sarmentoso San Clemente (949) 3669607 885 4 5.6 NW Clarence Lobo Elementary School 200 Avenida Vista Montana San Clemente (949) 3666740 463 4 3.4 NW Concordia Elementary School 3120 Avenida Del Presidente San Clemente (949) 4923060 646 4 5.7 NW Las Palmas Elementary School 1101 Calle Puente San Clemente (949) 2345333 751 4 6.9 NW Marblehead Elementary School 2410 Via Turqueza San Clemente (949) 2345339 577 4 5.2 NW Our Lady of Fatima School 105 N La Esperanza San Clemente (949) 4927320 285 4 4.0 NW Our Savior's Lutheran School 200 Avenida San Pablo San Clemente (949) 4926165 260 4 6.0 NW San Clemente High School 700 Avenida Pico San Clemente (949) 4924165 2982 4 6.9 NW Shorecliffs Middle School 240 Via Socorro San Clemente (949) 4981660 1061 4 5.5 NW St. Michael's Christian Academy 107 W Marquita San Clemente (949) 3669468 155 4 7.9 NW Truman Benedict Elementary School 1251 Calle Sarmentoso San Clemente (949) 4986617 694 4 7.3 NW Vista Del Mar Elementary School 1130 Avenida Talega San Clemente (949) 2345950 1137 4 7.3 NW Vista Del Mar Middle School 1130 Avenida Talega San Clemente (949) 2345950 522 5 10.6 NW Ambuehl Elementary School 28001 San Juan Creek Road San Juan Capistrano (949) 6610400 558 5 11.0 NW Broderick Montessori School 24292 Del Prado Dana Point (949) 4431193 70 5 10.4 NW Capistrano Home School 32972 Calle Perfecto San Juan Capistrano (949) 2349221 20 5 11.1 NW Capistrano Valley Christian Schools 32032 Del Obispo Street San Juan Capistrano (949) 4935683 492 5 9.7 NW Capo Beach Calvary 25975 Domingo Avenue Capistrano Beach (949) 4932006 225 5 11.3 NW Dana Hills High School 33333 Golden Lantern Dana Point (949) 4966666 2788 5 11.0 NW Del Obispo Elementary School 25591 Camino Del Avion San Juan Capistrano (949) 2345905 467 5 12.4 NW Jserra Catholic High School 26351 Junipero Serra Road San Juan Capistrano (949) 4939307 925 5 10.9 NW Kinoshita Elementary School 2 Via Positiva San Juan Capistrano (949) 4892131 630 5 10.9 NW Marco Forster Middle School 25601 Camino Del Avion San Juan Capistrano (949) 2345907 1444 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Distance Dire PAZ (miles) ction School Name Street Address Municipality Phone Enrollment 5 11.1 NW Mission Parish School 26801 Ortega Highway San Juan Capistrano (949) 2341324 320 5 12.6 NW Monarch Bay Montessori Academy 32920 Pacific Coast Highway Dana Point (949) 2403344 120 5 9.1 NW Palisades Elementary School 26462 Via Sacramento Dana Point (949) 4965942 510 5 13.8 NW Rancho Capistrano School 29251 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano (949) 6098700 66 5 11.2 NW Richard Henry Dana Elementary School 24242 La Cresta Dana Point (949) 4965784 376 Richard Henry Dana Exceptional Needs 5 11.1 NW School 24242 La Cresta Drive Dana Point (949) 2345505 48 5 12.2 NW Saddleback Valley Christian School 26333 Oso Road San Juan Capistrano (949) 4434050 590 5 11.1 NW San Juan Elementary School 31642 El Camino Real San Juan Capistrano (949) 4934533 665 5 9.9 NW San Juan Hills High School 29211 Vista Montana San Juan Capistrano (949) 2345900 655 5 10.9 NW San Juan Montessori 32143 Alipaz Street San Juan Capistrano (949) 4962927 45 5 11.4 NW Serra High School 31422 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano (949) 4939307 175 5 12.7 NW South Shores Christian School 32712 Crown Valley Parkway Dana Point (949) 4965032 56 5 10.5 NW St Edward School 33866 Calle La Primavera Dana Point (949) 4961241 750 5 10.8 NW St. Margaret's Episcopal School 31641 La Novia San Juan Capistrano (949) 6610108 1222 5 10.9 NW Stonebridge Day School 32091 Alipaz St San Juan Capistrano (949) 4966776 45 5 13.6 NW Stoneybrooke Christian Schools 26300 Via Escolar Mission Viejo (949) 3644407 443 Orange County Totals: 24,123 San Diego County 1 1.8 NW San Onofre School 200 Pate Road MCB (760) 7314360 758 1 2.0 NW San Onofre Youth Center Bldg 51570 MCB (760) 4989166 114 San Diego County Totals: 872 TOTAL: 24,995 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table E2. Preschools and Daycares within the EPZ Distance Dire Enroll PAZ (miles) ction School Name Street Address Municipality Phone ment Orange County 4 6.3 NW Bright Horizons at San Clemente 2015 Calle Frontera San Clemente (949) 4925555 144 4 5.6 NW Clarence Lobo 200 Avenida Vista Montana San Clemente (949) 3666740 100 4 3.4 NW Concordia Elementary School 3120 Avenida Del Presidente San Clemente (949) 4923060 24 4 6.5 NW Kindercare Learning Center 1141 Puerta Del Sol San Clemente (949) 3614860 128 4 7.6 NW La Cristianita Preschool 35522 Camino Capistrano San Clemente (949) 4961405 85 4 5.7 NW Las Palmas State Preschool 1101 Calle Puente San Clemente (949) 4923456 48 4 6.9 NW Marblehead Elementary School 2410 Via Turqueza San Clemente (949) 2345339 16 4 4.0 NW Our Savior's Lutheran Preschool 200 Avenida San Pablo San Clemente (949) 4926165 60 4 8.5 NW Palisades United Methodist Preschool 27002 Camino De Estrella Capistrano Beach (949) 6613375 80 4 5.4 NW San Clemente Presbyterian Preschool 119 Avenida De La Estrella San Clemente (949) 4926158 79 4 5.1 NW San Clemente Preschool 163 Avenida Victoria San Clemente (949) 4981025 75 4 5.7 NW Serra Preschool 1005 Calle Puente San Clemente (949) 4928188 24 4 5.6 NW St. Michaels Infant/Toddler Center 702 N Avenida De La Estrella San Clemente (949) 4922553 58 4 6.5 NW Talega Life Church Preschool 1040 Calle Negocio San Clemente (949) 4931980 70 5 11.0 NW Broderick Montessori School, Inc 24292 Del Prado Dana Point (949) 4431193 30 5 10.9 NW Capistrano Beach Cities YMCADel Obispo 25591 Camino Del Avion San Juan Capistrano (949) 2345905 90 5 9.7 NW Capo Beach Calvary 25975 Domingo Avenue Capistrano Beach (949) 4932006 50 5 11.3 NW Capo Valley Head Start 31485 El Camino Real San Juan Capistrano (949) 6618029 60 5 11.3 NW Childbridge Preschool 31113 Rancho Viejo Rd San Juan Capistrano (949) 6613355 48 5 10.8 NW Dana Montessori School 34052 Violet Lantern Street Dana Point (949) 2407271 37 5 10.6 NW Dana Point Montessori 33501 Del Obispo Street Dana Point (949) 4434213 36 5 11.2 NW Evelyn Lobo Villegas Head Start 32204 Del Obispo Street San Juan Capistrano (949) 6615243 40 5 10.7 NW Gloria Dei Lutheran Preschool 33501 Stonehill Drive Dana Point (949) 4933414 54 5 10.9 NW Kinoshita Elementary School 2 Via Positiva San Juan Capistrano (949) 4892131 24 5 9.5 NW Little Minds Montessori Academy 34240 Camino Capistrano Capistrano Beach (949) 3748352 75 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Distance Dire Enroll PAZ (miles) ction School Name Street Address Municipality Phone ment 5 11.1 NW Mission Parish School 26801 Ortega Highway San Juan Capistrano (949) 2341300 25 5 12.6 NW Monarch Bay Montessori Academy 32920 Pacific Coast Highway Dana Point (949) 4293101 90 5 9.5 NW Ohana Preschool 26153 Victoria Boulevard Capistrano Beach (949) 6616258 45 5 9.1 NW Palisades Elementary School 26462 Via Sacramento Dana Point (949) 4965942 24 5 11.2 NW Richard Henry Dana Elementary School 24242 La Cresta Dr Dana Point (949) 4965784 24 5 10.9 NW San Juan Montessori 32143 Alipaz Street San Juan Capistrano (949) 4962927 45 5 12.7 NW South Shores Christian Preschool 32712 Crown Valley Parkway Dana Point (949) 4969331 86 5 10.5 NW St Edward's Catholic Preschool 33866 Calle La Primavera Dana Point (949) 2408485 72 5 10.8 NW St. Margaret's Episcopal School 31641 La Novia San Juan Capistrano (949) 6610110 90 5 13.6 NW Stoneybrooke Christian Schools 26300 Via Escolar Mission Viejo (949) 3641191 60 Orange County Totals: 2,096 San Diego County 1 1.7 NW San Onofre Child Development Center Building 51080 MCB (760) 7257311 190 San Diego County Totals: 190 TOTAL: 2,286 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table E3. Medical Facilities within the EPZ Ambul Wheel Bed Distance Dire Cap Current atory chair ridden PAZ (miles) ction Facility Name Street Address Municipality Phone acity Census Patients Patients Patients Orange County 4 7.0 NW Accent on Seniors 273 Via Ballena San Clemente (949) 3612093 6 6 3 2 1 4 5.2 NW Calle Sonora Place 201 Calle Sonora San Clemente (949) 3612041 6 6 3 2 1 Camino Hills Care 4 8.2 NW Home 2 2940 Arroyo San Clemente (949) 3691609 6 6 3 2 1 Camino Hills of San 4 8.1 NW Clemente 2924 Arroyo San Clemente (949) 3698390 6 6 3 2 1 Casa Paraiso 4 4.9 NW Arlena 413 Avenida Arlena San Clemente (949) 4921447 6 6 3 2 1 Chateau by the Golf 4 7.7 NW Course 425 Avenida Vaquero San Clemente (949) 2181360 6 6 3 2 1 Leriza's Guest 4 9.1 NW Home 4019 Via Manzana San Clemente (949) 2400613 6 6 3 2 1 4 8.6 NW Malash Gardens 3106 Sombreado San Clemente (949) 3690446 6 6 3 2 1 Mirabel by the Sea 4 5.8 NW V 249 Calle Empalme San Clemente (949) 4982488 5 5 2 2 1 4 6.0 NW Rosehaven I 203 Calle Del Juego San Clemente (949) 3662599 6 6 3 2 1 4 5.9 NW Rosehaven III 309 Calle Sandia San Clemente (949) 3669550 6 6 3 2 1 Saddleback Memorial Medical 654 Camino De Los 4 8.2 NW Center Mares San Clemente (949) 4961122 86 86 43 29 14 San Clemente Villas 660 Camino De Los 4 8.1 NW by the Sea Mares San Clemente (949) 4893400 190 168 126 28 14 2827 Calle 4 8.0 NW Seaview Care Home Guadalajara San Clemente (949) 2185719 6 6 3 2 1 4 8.1 NW Talega Terrace 24 Via Andaremos San Clemente (949) 5423856 6 6 3 2 1 Tender Touch 2942 Calle Grande 4 7.6 NW Eldercare Vista San Clemente (949) 3613837 6 6 3 2 1 26922 Camino De 5 8.4 NW Aegis of Dana Point Estrella Capistrano Beach (949) 4882650 76 76 38 25 13 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Ambul Wheel Bed Distance Dire Cap Current atory chair ridden PAZ (miles) ction Facility Name Street Address Municipality Phone acity Census Patients Patients Patients 32353 San Juan Creek 5 10.5 NW Atria San Juan Road San Juan Capistrano (949) 6611220 140 79 75 4 0 5 13.1 NW Bayside Terrace 23031 Java Sea Drive Dana Point (949) 4932066 6 6 3 2 1 5 10.7 NW Casa De Amma 27231 Calle Arroyo San Juan Capistrano (949) 4969001 6 6 3 2 1 Del Obispo Terrace 32200 Del Obispo 5 11.2 NW Senior Living Street San Juan Capistrano (949) 2572928 95 80 70 10 0 Emeritus at San 31741 Rancho Viejo 5 10.8 NW Juan Capistrano Road San Juan Capistrano (949) 2488855 101 87 87 0 0 Fountains At Sea 5 10.3 NW Bluffs 25411 Sea Bluffs Drive Dana Point (949) 3540033 88 88 44 29 15 5 8.6 NW Mirabel By the Sea 26961 Calle Granada Capistrano Beach (949) 4966689 6 6 3 2 1 5 9.3 NW Niguel Hills Villa I 33872 Calle Borrego San Juan Capistrano (949) 4435228 6 6 3 2 1 San Juan Capistrano 31736 Rancho Viejo 5 10.8 NW South Dialysis Rd # B San Juan Capistrano (949) 2401454 18 18 9 6 3 5 11.1 NW Sea Bright Place 33216 Sea Bright Dr Dana Point (949) 6613291 6 6 3 2 1 5 13.1 NW Seaside Terrace 32591 7 Seas Dr Dana Point (949) 4938333 6 6 3 2 1 Silverado Senior Living San Juan 30311 Camino 5 12.4 NW Capistrano Capistrano San Juan Capistrano (949) 4294558 96 91 51 40 0 Tessie's Place Loving Care Home 5 11.1 NW #1 27642 Rosedale Dr San Juan Capistrano (949) 5470529 6 6 3 2 1 Tessie's Place Loving Care Home 27021 Mission Hills 5 12.4 NW #2 Drive San Juan Capistrano (949) 4431496 6 6 3 2 1 Tessie's Place Loving Care Home 5 12.6 NW #3 26551 Royale Drive San Juan Capistrano (949) 4810912 6 6 3 2 1 5 8.9 NW Time & Patience 34456 Calle Portola Capistrano Beach (949) 2488775 3 3 0 2 1 TOTAL: 1,030 913 611 219 83 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table E4. Parks/Recreational Attractions within the EPZ Distance Dire PAZ (miles) ction Facility Name Facility Type Street Address Municipality Phone Transients Vehicles Orange County 4 6.2 NW Bella Collina Towne & Golf Club Golf course 200 Avenida La Pata San Clemente (949) 4986604 17 13 4 3.9 NW Calafia State Park Beach 243 Avenida Lobeiro San Clemente (949) 3618219 1,243 200 City of San Clemente: Municipal Golf 4 3.5 NW Course Golf course 150 East Avenida Magdalena San Clemente (949) 3618384 32 17 4 3.7 NW San Clemente State Beach Beach 225 Avenida Califia San Clemente (949) 4923156 282 98 4 3.7 NW San Clemente State Beach Campground 225 Avenida Califia San Clemente (949) 4920802 878 322 4 7.8 NW Shorecliffs Golf Club Golf course 501 Avenida Vaquero San Clemente (949) 4921177 18 12 4 6.9 NW Talega Golf Club Golf course 990 Avenida Talega San Clemente (949) 3696226 20 13 5 10.2 NW Dana Point Harbor Marina 24500 Dana Point Harbor Drive Dana Point (949) 4936222 396 153 5 9.6 NW Doheny State Beach Beach 25300 Dana Point Harbor Drive Dana Point (949) 4966171 5,432 1,108 5 9.6 NW Doheny State Beach Campground 25300 Dana Point Harbor Drive Dana Point (949) 4966171 665 244 5 11.5 NW Marbella Country Club1 Golf course 30800 Golf Club Drive San Juan Capistrano (949) 2483700 0 0 5 11.1 NW Mission San Juan Capistrano Park 26801 Ortega Highway San Juan Capistrano (949) 2341360 150 57 5 11.0 NW Rancho Viejo Riding Park Park 29500 Ortega Highway San Juan Capistrano (949) 4880422 2,000 760 5 12.3 NW Salt Creek Beach Beach 33333 Pacific Coast Hwy Dana Point (949) 9232280 3,000 600 5 10.4 NW San Juan Hills Golf Club Golf course 32120 San Juan Creek Road San Juan Capistrano (949) 4931167 50 32 5 11.3 NW Strands Beach Beach 33971 Selva Road #100 Dana Point (949) 4872500 1,109 300 Orange County Totals: 15,292 3,929 San Diego County 1 1.5 NW San Onofre State Beach Beach Basilone Road MCB (499) 9427421 4,554 1,486 1 1.5 NW San Onofre State Beach Campground Basilone Road MCB (949) 4926460 1,903 350 4 3.1 NW San Mateo Campground Campground 830 Cristianitos Road San Clemente (949) 3612531 856 314 San Diego County Totals: 7,313 2,150 TOTAL: 22,605 6,079 1

Marbella Country Club is assigned 0 transients because the visitors are all locals.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table E5. Lodging Facilities within the EPZ Distance Dire PAZ (miles) ction Facility Name Street Address Municipality Phone Transients Vehicles Orange County 4 5.0 NW Algodon Motel 135 Avenida Algodon San Clemente (949) 4923382 27 13 4 5.3 NW Always Inn 177 Avenida Cabrillo San Clemente (949) 3746165 5 3 4 4.3 NW Americas Best Value Inn 2002 South El Camino Real San Clemente (949) 3612110 55 27 4 5.0 NW Beachcomber Motel 533 Avenida Victoria San Clemente (949) 4925457 21 13 4 6.1 NW Best Western Casablanca Inn 1601 North El Camino Real San Clemente (949) 3611644 110 55 4 3.1 NW Carmelo Motel 3619 South El Camino Real San Clemente (949) 4920387 28 14 4 5.1 NW Casa Tropicana Inn at the Pier 610 Avenida Victoria San Clemente (949) 4921234 14 7 4 3.1 NW Comfort Suites San Clemente Beach 3701 South El Camino Real San Clemente (949) 3616600 120 120 4 5.9 NW Days Inn San Clemente 1301 North El Camino Real San Clemente (949) 3610636 72 36 4 5.4 NW Four Season Pacifica 326 Encino Lane San Clemente (949) 5291876 9 6 4 3.9 NW Hampton Inn & Suites San Clemente 2481 South El Camino Real San Clemente (800) 3085306 120 60 4 6.1 NW Holiday Inn Express 35 Via Pico Plaza San Clemente (949) 4988800 180 90 111 South Avenue De La 4 5.2 NW Holiday Inn Hotel San Clemente Estrella San Clemente (949) 3613000 70 140 4 4.2 NW Hotel Miramar 2222 South El Camino Real San Clemente (949) 4924992 22 11 4 3.9 NW La Vista Inn Motel 2435 South El Camino Real San Clemente (949) 4982782 17 9 4 4.4 NW Little Inn by the Beach 1819 South El Camino Real San Clemente (949) 4921960 31 16 4 4.9 NW Patriots Motel 711 South El Camino Real San Clemente (949) 2186348 26 13 4 5.2 NW San Clemente Cove Resort 104 South Alameda Lane San Clemente (949) 4926666 133 33 4 3.8 NW San Clemente Inn 2600 Avenida Del Presidente San Clemente (949) 4926103 355 167 4 5.1 NW Sea Horse Resort 602 Avenida Victoria San Clemente (949) 4921720 20 9 4 4.0 NW The INN at Calafia Beach 2341 South El Camino Real San Clemente (949) 4921174 32 16 4 4.3 NW Trade Winds Motel 2001 South El Camino Real San Clemente (949) 4928888 19 9 4 3.9 NW Travelodge San Clemente Beach 2441 South El Camino Real San Clemente (949) 4985954 32 22 San Juan 5 10.9 NW Best Western Capistrano Inn 27174 Ortega Highway Capistrano (949) 4935661 80 80 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Distance Dire PAZ (miles) ction Facility Name Street Address Municipality Phone Transients Vehicles Best Western PLUS Dana Point Innby 5 9.1 NW theSea 34744 Pacific Coast Hwy Dana Point (949) 2400150 50 25 34343 Street of the Blue 5 11.0 NW Blue Lantern Inn Lantern Dana Point (949) 6611304 52 25 Capistrano 5 8.9 NW Capistrano Seaside Inn 34862 Pacific Coast Hwy Beach (949) 4961399 48 24 Capistrano 5 9.2 NW Capistrano Surfside Inn Resort 34680 Pacific Coast Hwy Beach (949) 2407681 175 35 5 10.9 NW Dana Marina Motel 34111 Pacific Coast Hwy Dana Point (949) 4961300 40 20 5 10.1 NW Dana Point Harbor Inn 25325 Dana Point Harbor Drive Dana Point (949) 4935001 242 235 5 10.4 NW Dana Point Marina Inn 24800 Dana Point Harbor Drive Dana Point (949) 4961203 250 250 5 9.8 NW Doubletree 34402 Pacific Coast Hwy Dana Point (949) 6611100 390 243 Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suites Dana 5 10.2 NW Point 3434634308 Pacific Coast Hwy Dana Point (949) 2481000 310 77 5 10.3 NW Laguna Cliffs Marriott Resort & Spa 25135 Park Lantern Dana Point (888) 4762405 434 434 Capistrano 5 9.1 NW Quality Inn & Suites Oceanview 34734 Pacific Coast Hwy Beach (800) 4462276 56 28 5 12.0 NW The RitzCarlton Spa 1 RitzCarlton Drive Dana Point (949) 2402000 706 440 5 12.1 NW The St. Regis Monarch 1 Monarch Beach Resort Dana Point (949) 2343200 690 345 TOTAL: 5,041 3,150 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure E1. Schools within the EPZ San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure E2. Preschools and Daycares within the EPZ San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure E3. Medical Facilities within the EPZ San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure E4. Recreational Areas within the EPZ San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure E5. Lodging Facilities within the EPZ San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure E6. Lodging Facilities in the San Clemente Area San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station E16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX F Telephone Survey

F. TELEPHONE SURVEY F.1 Introduction The development of evacuation time estimates for the EPZ of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station requires the identification of travel patterns, car ownership and household size of the population within the EPZ. Demographic information can be obtained from Census data. The use of this data has several limitations when applied to emergency planning. First, the Census data do not encompass the range of information needed to identify the time required for preliminary activities (mobilization) that must be undertaken prior to evacuating the area.

Secondly, Census data do not contain attitudinal responses needed from the population of the EPZ and consequently may not accurately represent the anticipated behavioral characteristics of the evacuating populace.

These concerns are addressed by conducting a telephone survey of a representative sample of the EPZ population. The survey is designed to elicit information from the public concerning family demographics and estimates of response times to well defined events. The design of the survey includes a limited number of questions of the form What would you do if ? and other questions regarding activities with which the respondent is familiar (How long does it take you to ?)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

F.2 Survey Instrument and Sampling Plan Attachment A presents the final survey instrument used in this study. A draft of the instrument was submitted to stakeholders for comment. Comments were received and the survey instrument was modified accordingly, prior to conducting the survey.

Following the completion of the instrument, a sampling plan was developed. A sample size of approximately 500 completed survey forms yields results with a sampling error of +/-4.5% at the 95% confidence level. The sample must be drawn from the EPZ population. Consequently, a list of zip codes in the EPZ was developed using GIS software. This list is shown in Table F1. Along with each zip code, an estimate of the population and number of households in each area was determined by overlaying Census data and the EPZ boundary, again using GIS software. The proportional number of desired completed survey interviews for each area was identified, as shown in Table F1.

The completed survey adhered to the sampling plan.

Table F1. San Onofre Telephone Survey Sampling Plan EPZ HOUSEHOLDS EPZ POP EPZ POP IN ZIP IN ZIP FOR ZIP IN ZIP FOR 2010 2010 EXCLUDING REQUIRED CODE FOR 2010 EXCLUDING MCB MCB SAMPLE 92677 92055 9,716 92624 7,421 7,421 2,856 28 92629 26,028 26,028 11,369 112 92673 29,934 29,934 10,141 100 92675 34,680 34,680 11,416 113 92672 45,578 33,403 13,700 147 Total 153,357 131,466 49,482 500 Avg HH Size: 2.66 Note: Zip Code 92055 includes barracks (which may be temporary housing) within MCB and does not have a number of households within the Census. Zip Code 92672 includes portions of MCB with permanent housing. Zip Code 92058 is a third zip code within MCB, but only contains population outside of the San Onofre EPZ. Zip Code 92674 within San Clemente is a commercialonly zip code containing no permanent residents. Average household size calculation omits population residing in MCB.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

F.3 Survey Results The results of the survey fall into two categories. First, the household demographics of the area can be identified. Demographic information includes such factors as household size, automobile ownership, and automobile availability. The distributions of the time to perform certain pre evacuation activities are the second category of survey results. These data are processed to develop the trip generation distributions used in the evacuation modeling effort, as discussed in Section 5.

A review of the survey instrument reveals that several questions have a dont know (DK) or refused entry for a response. It is accepted practice in conducting surveys of this type to accept the answers of a respondent who offers a DK response for a few questions or who refuses to answer a few questions. To address the issue of occasional DK/refused responses from a large sample, the practice is to assume that the distribution of these responses is the same as the underlying distribution of the positive responses. In effect, the DK/refused responses are ignored and the distributions are based upon the positive data that is acquired.

F.3.1 Household Demographic Results Household Size Figure F1 presents the distribution of household size within the EPZ. The average household contains 2.63 people. The estimated household size (2.66 persons) used to determine the survey sample (Table F1) was drawn from Census data. The close agreement between the average household size obtained from the survey and from the Census is an indication of the reliability of the survey.

San Onofre Household Size 50%

40%

% of Households 30%

20%

10%

0%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+

Household Size Figure F1. Household Size in the EPZ San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Automobile Ownership The average number of automobiles available per household in the EPZ is 2.05. It should be noted that approximately 2.4 percent of households do not have access to an automobile. The distribution of automobile ownership is presented in Figure F2. Figure F3 and Figure F4 present the automobile availability by household size. Note that the majority of households without access to a car are single person households. As expected, nearly all households of 2 or more people have access to at least one vehicle.

San Onofre Vehicle Availability 50%

40%

% of Households 30%

20%

10%

0%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9+

Number of Vehicles Figure F2. Household Vehicle Availability San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Distribution of Vehicles by HH Size 15 Person Households 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 100%

80%

% of Households 60%

40%

20%

0%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9+

Vehicles Figure F3. Vehicle Availability 1 to 5 Person Households Distribution of Vehicles by HH Size 69+ Person Households 6 People 7 People 8 People 9+ People 100%

80%

% of Households 60%

40%

20%

0%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9+

Vehicles Figure F4. Vehicle Availability 6 to 9+ Person Households San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Ridesharing 93% of the households surveyed who do not own a vehicle responded that they would share a ride with a neighbor, relative, or friend if a car was not available to them when advised to evacuate in the event of an emergency. Note, however, that only those households with no access to a vehicle - 14 total out of the sample size of 500 - answered this question. Thus, the results are not statistically significant. As such, the NRC recommendation of 50% ridesharing is used throughout this study. Figure F5 presents this response.

San Onofre Rideshare with Neighbor/Friend 100%

80%

% of Households 60%

40%

20%

0%

Yes No Figure F5. Household Ridesharing Preference San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Commuters Figure F6 presents the distribution of the number of commuters in each household.

Commuters are defined as household members who travel to work or college on a daily basis.

The data shows an average of 0.96 commuters in each household in the EPZ, and 57% of households have at least one commuter.

San Onofre Commuters 50%

40%

% of Households 30%

20%

10%

0%

0 1 2 3 4+

Number of Commuters Figure F6. Commuters in Households in the EPZ San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Commuter Travel Modes Figure F7 presents the mode of travel that commuters use on a daily basis. The vast majority of commuters use their private automobiles to travel to work. The data shows an average of 1.10 employees per vehicle, assuming 2 people per vehicle - on average - for carpools.

San Onofre Travel Mode to Work 100%

84.9%

80%

% of Commuters 60%

40%

20%

9.2%

1.5% 1.5% 2.8%

0%

Rail Bus Walk/Bike Drive Alone Carpool (2+)

Mode of Travel Figure F7. Modes of Travel in the EPZ F.3.2 Evacuation Response Several questions were asked to gauge the populations response to an emergency. These are now discussed:

How many of the vehicles would your household use during an evacuation? The response is shown in Figure F8. On average, evacuating households would use 1.42 vehicles.

Would your family await the return of other family members prior to evacuating the area?

Of the survey participants who responded, 36 percent said they would await the return of other family members before evacuating and 64 percent indicated that they would not await the return of other family members.

If you had a household pet, would you take your pet with you if you were asked to evacuate the area? Based on the responses to the survey, 76 percent of households have a family pet.

Of the households with pets, 93 percent of them indicated that they would take their pets with them, as shown in Figure F9.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Vehicles Used for Evacuation 100%

80%

60%

% of Households 40%

20%

0%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9+

Number of Vehicles Figure F8. Number of Vehicles Used for Evacuation Households Evacuating with Pets 100%

80%

% of Households 60%

40%

20%

0%

Yes No Figure F9. Households Evacuating with Pets San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Emergency officials advise you to take shelter at home in an emergency. Would you? This question is designed to elicit information regarding compliance with instructions to shelter in place. The results indicate that 84 percent of households who are advised to shelter in place would do so; the remaining 16 percent would choose to evacuate the area. Note the baseline ETE study assumes 20 percent of households will not comply with the shelter advisory, as per Section 2.5.2 of NUREG/CR7002. Thus, the data obtained above is significantly less than the federal guidance recommendation. As indicated in Appendix M (Table M2), a sensitivity study was conducted to estimate the impact of shadow evacuation (noncompliance of shelter advisory) on ETE. The results indicate that ETE are not impacted by a change in shadow evacuation from 20% to 16%.

Emergency officials advise you to take shelter at home now in an emergency and possibly evacuate later while people in other areas are advised to evacuate now. Would you? This question is designed to elicit information specifically related to the possibility of a staged evacuation. That is, asking a population to shelter in place now and then to evacuate after a specified period of time. Results indicate that 75 percent of households would follow instructions and delay the start of evacuation until so advised, while the balance of 25 percent would choose to begin evacuating immediately.

F.3.3 Time Distribution Results The survey asked several questions about the amount of time it takes to perform certain pre evacuation activities. These activities involve actions taken by residents during the course of their daytoday lives. Thus, the answers fall within the realm of the responders experience.

The mobilization distributions provided below are the result of having applied the analysis described in Section 5.4.1 on the component activities of the mobilization.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

How long does it take the commuter to complete preparation for leaving work? Figure F10 presents the cumulative distribution; in all cases, the activity is completed within 90 minutes.

91 percent can leave within 30 minutes.

Time to Prepare to Leave Work 100%

80%

% of Commuters 60%

40%

20%

0%

0 15 30 45 60 75 90 Preparation Time (min)

Figure F10. Time Required to Prepare to Leave Work/School How long would it take the commuter to travel home? Figure F11 presents the work to home travel time for the EPZ. About 80 percent of commuters can arrive home within 30 minutes of leaving work; all within 120 minutes.

Work to Home Travel 100%

80%

% of Commuters 60%

40%

20%

0%

0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 Travel Time (min)

Figure F11. Work to Home Travel Time San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

How long would it take the family to pack clothing, secure the house, and load the car?

Figure F12 presents the time required to prepare for leaving on an evacuation trip. In many ways this activity mimics a familys preparation for a short holiday or weekend away from home. Hence, the responses represent the experience of the responder in performing similar activities.

The distribution shown in Figure F12 has a long tail. About 70 percent of households can be ready to leave home within 45 minutes; the remaining households require up to an additional 150 minutes.

Time to Prepare to Leave Home 100%

80%

% of Households 60%

40%

20%

0%

0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 180 195 Preparation Time (min)

Figure F12. Time to Prepare Home for Evacuation F.4 Conclusions The telephone survey provides valuable, relevant data associated with the EPZ population, which have been used to quantify demographics specific to the EPZ, and mobilization time which can influence evacuation time estimates.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ATTACHMENT A Telephone Survey Instrument San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Telephone Survey Instrument Hello, my name is ___________ and Im working in cooperation COL. 1 Unused with local emergency management agencies to identify local COL. 2 Unused behavior during emergency situations. This information will be COL. 3 Unused used for emergency planning and will be shared with local officials COL. 4 Unused to enhance emergency response plans in your area for all hazards; emergency planning for some hazards may require evacuation. COL. 5 Unused Your responses will greatly contribute to local emergency Sex COL. 8 preparedness. I will not ask for your name and the survey shall take 1 Male no more than 10 minutes to complete. 2 Female INTERVIEWER: ASK TO SPEAK TO THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD OR THE SPOUSE OF THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD.

(Terminate call if not a residence.)

DO NOT ASK:

1A. Record area code. To Be Determined COL. 911 1B. Record exchange number. To Be Determined COL. 1214

2. What is your home zip code? COL. 1519 3A. In total, how many running cars, or other running COL. 20 SKIP TO vehicles are usually available to the household? 1 ONE Q. 4 (DO NOT READ ANSWERS) 2 TWO Q. 4 3 THREE Q. 4 4 FOUR Q. 4 5 FIVE Q. 4 6 SIX Q. 4 7 SEVEN Q. 4 8 EIGHT Q. 4 9 NINE OR MORE Q. 4 0 ZERO (NONE) Q. 3B X DONT KNOW/REFUSED Q. 3B 3B. In an emergency, could you get a ride out of the COL. 21 area with a neighbor or friend? 1 YES 2 NO X DONT KNOW/REFUSED

4. How many people usually live in this household? COL. 22 COL. 23 (DO NOT READ ANSWERS) 1 ONE 0 TEN 2 TWO 1 ELEVEN 3 THREE 2 TWELVE 4 FOUR 3 THIRTEEN 5 FIVE 4 FOURTEEN 6 SIX 5 FIFTEEN San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

7 SEVEN 6 SIXTEEN 8 EIGHT 7 SEVENTEEN 9 NINE 8 EIGHTEEN 9 NINETEEN OR MORE X DONT KNOW/REFUSED

5. How many adults in the household commute to a COL. 24 SKIP TO job, or to college on a daily basis? 0 ZERO Q. 9 1 ONE Q. 6 2 TWO Q. 6 3 THREE Q. 6 4 FOUR OR MORE Q. 6 5 DONT KNOW/REFUSED Q. 9 INTERVIEWER: For each person identified in Question 5, ask Questions 6, 7, and 8.

6. Thinking about commuter #1, how does that person usually travel to work or college? (REPEAT QUESTION FOR EACH COMMUTER)

Commuter #1 Commuter #2 Commuter #3 Commuter #4 COL. 25 COL. 26 COL. 27 COL. 28 Rail 1 1 1 1 Bus 2 2 2 2 Walk/Bicycle 3 3 3 3 Drive Alone 4 4 4 4 Carpool2 or more people 5 5 5 5 Dont know/Refused 6 6 6 6

7. How much time on average, would it take Commuter #1 to travel home from work or college? (REPEAT QUESTION FOR EACH COMMUTER) (DO NOT READ ANSWERS)

COMMUTER #1 COMMUTER #2 COL. 29 COL. 30 COL. 31 COL. 32 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 4650 MINUTES 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 4650 MINUTES 2 610 MINUTES 2 5155 MINUTES 2 610 MINUTES 2 5155 MINUTES 3 1115 MINUTES 3 56 - 1 HOUR 3 1115 MINUTES 3 56 - 1 HOUR OVER 1 HOUR, BUT OVER 1 HOUR, BUT 4 1620 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR 15 4 1620 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR MINUTES 15 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 5 2125 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 5 2125 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 30 MINUTES HOUR 30 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 6 2630 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 6 2630 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 45 MINUTES HOUR 45 MINUTES San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 7 3135 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 7 3135 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 HOURS HOURS OVER 2 HOURS OVER 2 HOURS 8 3640 MINUTES 8 8 3640 MINUTES 8 (SPECIFY ______) (SPECIFY ______)

9 4145 MINUTES 9 9 4145 MINUTES 9 0 0 DONT KNOW DONT KNOW X X

/REFUSED /REFUSED COMMUTER #3 COMMUTER #4 COL. 33 COL. 34 COL. 35 COL. 36 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 4650 MINUTES 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 4650 MINUTES 2 610 MINUTES 2 5155 MINUTES 2 610 MINUTES 2 5155 MINUTES 3 1115 MINUTES 3 56 - 1 HOUR 3 1115 MINUTES 3 56 - 1 HOUR OVER 1 HOUR, BUT OVER 1 HOUR, BUT 4 1620 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR 15 4 1620 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR MINUTES 15 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 5 2125 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 5 2125 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 30 MINUTES HOUR 30 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 6 2630 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 6 2630 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 45 MINUTES HOUR 45 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 7 3135 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 7 3135 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 HOURS HOURS OVER 2 HOURS OVER 2 HOURS 8 3640 MINUTES 8 8 3640 MINUTES 8 (SPECIFY ______) (SPECIFY ______)

9 4145 MINUTES 9 9 4145 MINUTES 9 0 0 DONT KNOW DONT KNOW X X

/REFUSED /REFUSED

8. Approximately how much time does it take Commuter #1 to complete preparation for leaving work or college prior to starting the trip home? (REPEAT QUESTION FOR EACH COMMUTER) (DO NOT READ ANSWERS)

COMMUTER #1 COMMUTER #2 COL. 37 COL. 38 COL. 39 COL. 40 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 4650 MINUTES 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 4650 MINUTES 2 610 MINUTES 2 5155 MINUTES 2 610 MINUTES 2 5155 MINUTES 3 1115 MINUTES 3 56 - 1 HOUR 3 1115 MINUTES 3 56 - 1 HOUR OVER 1 HOUR, BUT OVER 1 HOUR, BUT 4 1620 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR 15 4 1620 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR MINUTES 15 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 5 2125 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 5 2125 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 30 MINUTES HOUR 30 MINUTES San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 6 2630 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 6 2630 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 45 MINUTES HOUR 45 MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 7 3135 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 7 3135 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 HOURS HOURS OVER 2 HOURS OVER 2 HOURS 8 3640 MINUTES 8 8 3640 MINUTES 8 (SPECIFY ______) (SPECIFY ______)

9 4145 MINUTES 9 9 4145 MINUTES 9 0 0 X DONT KNOW /REFUSED X DONT KNOW /REFUSED COMMUTER #3 COMMUTER #4 COL. 41 COL. 42 COL. 43 COL. 44 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 4650 MINUTES 1 5 MINUTES OR LESS 1 4650 MINUTES 2 610 MINUTES 2 5155 MINUTES 2 610 MINUTES 2 5155 MINUTES 3 1115 MINUTES 3 56 - 1 HOUR 3 1115 MINUTES 3 56 - 1 HOUR OVER 1 HOUR, BUT OVER 1 HOUR, BUT LESS 4 1620 MINUTES 4 LESS THAN 1 HOUR 15 4 1620 MINUTES 4 THAN 1 HOUR 15 MINUTES MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 16 5 2125 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 5 2125 MINUTES 5 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 30 30 MINUTES MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 31 6 2630 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 6 2630 MINUTES 6 MINUTES AND 1 HOUR 45 45 MINUTES MINUTES BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 BETWEEN 1 HOUR 46 7 3135 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 7 3135 MINUTES 7 MINUTES AND 2 HOURS HOURS OVER 2 HOURS OVER 2 HOURS (SPECIFY 8 3640 MINUTES 8 8 3640 MINUTES 8 (SPECIFY ______) ______)

9 4145 MINUTES 9 9 4145 MINUTES 9 0 0 X DONT KNOW /REFUSED X DONT KNOW /REFUSED

9. If you were advised by local authorities to evacuate, how much time would it take the household to pack clothing, medications, secure the house, load the car, and complete preparations prior to evacuating the area? (DO NOT READ ANSWERS)

COL. 45 COL. 46 1 LESS THAN 15 MINUTES 1 3 HOURS TO 3 HOURS 15 MINUTES 2 1530 MINUTES 2 3 HOURS 16 MINUTES TO 3 HOURS 30 MINUTES 3 3145 MINUTES 3 3 HOURS 31 MINUTES TO 3 HOURS 45 MINUTES 4 46 MINUTES - 1 HOUR 4 3 HOURS 46 MINUTES TO 4 HOURS 5 1 HOUR TO 1 HOUR 15 MINUTES 5 4 HOURS TO 4 HOURS 15 MINUTES 6 1 HOUR 16 MINUTES TO 1 HOUR 30 MINUTES 6 4 HOURS 16 MINUTES TO 4 HOURS 30 MINUTES San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

7 1 HOUR 31 MINUTES TO 1 HOUR 45 MINUTES 7 4 HOURS 31 MINUTES TO 4 HOURS 45 MINUTES 8 1 HOUR 46 MINUTES TO 2 HOURS 8 4 HOURS 46 MINUTES TO 5 HOURS 9 2 HOURS TO 2 HOURS 15 MINUTES 9 5 HOURS TO 5 HOURS 30 MINUTES 0 2 HOURS 16 MINUTES TO 2 HOURS 30 MINUTES 0 5 HOURS 31 MINUTES TO 6 HOURS X 2 HOURS 31 MINUTES TO 2 HOURS 45 MINUTES X OVER 6 HOURS (SPECIFY _______)

Y 2 HOURS 46 MINUTES TO 3 HOURS COL. 47 1 DONT KNOW/REFUSED

10. Please choose one of the following (READ COL. 50 ANSWERS): 1 A If you were at home and were asked to evacuate, 2 B A. I would await the return of household commuters to evacuate together.

B. I would evacuate independently and meet X DONT KNOW/REFUSED other household members later.

11. How many vehicles would your household use during an evacuation? (DO NOT READ ANSWERS)

COL. 51 1 ONE 2 TWO 3 THREE 4 FOUR 5 FIVE 6 SIX 7 SEVEN 8 EIGHT 9 NINE OR MORE 0 ZERO (NONE)

X DONT KNOW/REFUSED 12A. Emergency officials advise you to take shelter at home in an COL. 52 emergency. Would you: (READ ANSWERS) 1 A A. SHELTER; or 2 B B. EVACUATE X DONT KNOW/REFUSED 12B. Emergency officials advise you to take shelter at home now in COL. 53 an emergency and possibly evacuate later while people in 1 A other areas are advised to evacuate now. Would you: (READ 2 B ANSWERS)

X DONT KNOW/REFUSED A. SHELTER; or B. EVACUATE

13. If you have a household pet, would you take your pet with you if you were asked to evacuate the area?

(READ ANSWERS)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

COL. 54 1 DONT HAVE A PET 2 YES 3 NO X DONT KNOW/REFUSED Thank you very much. _______________________________

(TELEPHONE NUMBER CALLED)

IF REQUESTED:

For additional information, contact your County Emergency Management Agency during normal business hours.

County EMA Phone San Diego County (858) 5653490 Orange County (714) 6477042 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station F19 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX G Traffic Management Plan

G. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN NUREG/CR7002 indicates that the existing TCPs and ACPs identified by the offsite agencies should be used in the evacuation simulation modeling. The traffic and access control plans for the EPZ were provided by the municipalities and MCB; recommendations were made in areas where the use of modified TCPs would benefit ETE. The modified TCPs given below assume the numbers that are assigned to these TCP locations in the City of San Clemente Traffic Control Points planning document. The modified TCPs were discussed with the offsite agencies at the final meeting and will be incorporated in future emergency plan updates.

G.1 Traffic Control Points As discussed in Section 9, traffic control points at intersections (which are controlled) are modeled as actuated signals. If an intersection has a pretimed signal, stop, or yield control, and the intersection is identified as a traffic control point, the control type was changed to an actuated signal in the DYNEV II system. Table K2 provides the control type and node number for those nodes which are controlled. If the existing control was changed due to the point being a Traffic Control Point, the control type is indicated as a TCP in Table K2.

As discussed in Section 7.3, the animation of evacuation traffic conditions indicates the portions of San Clemente situated east of I5 are the last areas to clear. This is partially due to the fact that movements are restricted such that all traffic is routed onto I5 northbound at the interchanges of I5 with Avenida Presidio, Avenida Palizada and Avenida Pico (TCPs 5A and B, 6, and 7 respectively). It is recommended that the City of San Clemente allow movement westbound across I5 so that evacuees may seek alternative paths towards SR1 which presents an uncongested exit path during the later stages of evacuation. To facilitate movement onto SR1, modification to the TCP located at the intersection of Avenida Pico with El Camino Real (TCP 10) is also recommended. The recommended changes at this intersection are designed to allow movements onto SR1 northbound which provides an alternative route out of the EPZ to I5.

It is recommended that MCB consider establishing a TCP at the intersection of San Mateo Dr and Basilone Rd, prohibiting vehicles from using Basilone Rd northbound toward the San Onofre family housing area and I5.

Figure G1 maps the TCPs in the SONGS EPZ. Schematics are provided for the 5 recommended TCP modifications and can be seen in Figure G2 through Figure G6. The suggested new TCP located in MCB can be seen in Figure G7.

Since the recommendations primarily consist of removing restrictions imposed by the current TCPs in San Clemente, the resources required to enforce the traffic control strategy are reduced as a result of the proposed modifications. The modified TCPs require a total of 18 less barricades, 54 less traffic cones as the current TCPs, although additional deputies may be required. The additional TCP located in MCB will require a total of 16 barricades.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station G1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure G1. Traffic Control Points for the SONGS Site San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station G2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure G2. Recommended TCP 5A Modification San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station G3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure G3. Recommended TCP 5B Modification San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station G4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure G4. Recommended TCP 6 Modification San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station G5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure G5. Recommended TCP 7 Modification San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station G6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure G6. Recommended TCP 10 Modification San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station G7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure G7. Recommended TCP at the Intersection of Basilone Rd and San Mateo Dr San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station G8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX H Evacuation Regions

H. EVACUATION REGIONS This appendix presents the evacuation percentages for each Evacuation Region (Table H1) and maps of all Evacuation Regions. The percentages presented in Table H1 are based on the methodology discussed in assumption 5 of Section 2.2 and shown in Figure 21.

Note the baseline ETE study assumes 20 percent of households will not comply with the shelter advisory, as per Section 2.5.2 of NUREG/CR7002.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table H1. Percent of SubArea Population Evacuating for Each Region Description PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R01 2Mile Region 2Mile Region 100% 20% 20% 20% 20%

R02 5Mile Region 5Mile Region 100% 100% 100% 100% 20%

R03 Full EPZ Full EPZ 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Evacuate 2Mile Region and Downwind to 5 Miles Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R04 NW, NNW, N P,Q,R,A,B 100% 20% 20% 100% 20%

R05 NNE 100% 20% 100% 100% 20%

R06 NE, ENE, E, ESE C,D,E,F,G 100% 20% 100% 20% 20%

R07 SE 100% 100% 100% 20% 20%

R08 SSE, S, SSW, SW, WSW, W H,J,K,L,M,N 100% 100% 20% 20% 20%

R09 WNW 100% 100% 20% 100% 20%

Evacuate 5Mile Region and Downwind to EPZ Boundary Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 N/A WNW, NW, NNW, N Refer to R03 NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, SE, SSE, N/A Refer to R02 S, SSW, SW, WSW, W Evacuate 2Mile Region and Downwind to EPZ Boundary Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R10 NW, NNW, N P,Q,R,A,B 100% 20% 20% 100% 100%

N/A NNE Refer to R05 N/A NE, ENE, E, ESE C,D,E,F,G Refer to R06 N/A SE, SSE Refer to R07 N/A S, SSW, SW, WSW, W H,J,K,L,M,N Refer to R08 R11 WNW 100% 100% 20% 100% 100%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Staged Evacuation 2Mile Region Evacuates, then Evacuate Downwind to 5 Miles Wind Direction Towards PAZ Region NRC SONGS 1 2 3 4 5 R12 NW, NNW, N P,Q,R,A,B 100% 20% 20% 100% 20%

R13 NNE 100% 20% 100% 100% 20%

R14 NE, ENE, E, ESE C,D,E,F,G 100% 20% 100% 20% 20%

R15 SE 100% 100% 100% 20% 20%

R16 SSE, S, SSW, SW, WSW, W H,J,K,L,M,N 100% 100% 20% 20% 20%

R17 WNW 100% 100% 20% 100% 20%

R18 5Mile Region 100% 100% 100% 100% 20%

SONGS Specific Evacuation Regions PAZ Region Description 1 2 3 4 5 R19 Evacuate PAZ 5 Only 20% 20% 20% 20% 100%

R20 Evacuate 1,Shelter then Evacuate 2, 3, 4, 5 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

R21 Evacuate 1, 2, 3, 4, Shelter then Evacuate 5 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

PAZ(s) ShelterinPlace until 90% ETE for PAZ(s) ShelterinPlace PAZ(s) Evacuate Unstaged Region, then Evacuate San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H1. Region R01 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H2. Region R02 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H3. Region R03 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H4. Region R04 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H5. Region R05 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H6. Region R06 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H7. Region R07 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H8. Region R08 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H9. Region R09 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H10. Region R10 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H11 Region R11 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H12 Region R12 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H13 Region R13 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H14 Region R14 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H15 Region R15 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H16 Region R16 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H19 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H17 Region R17 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H20 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H18 Region R18 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H21 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H19 Region R19 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H22 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H20 Region R20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H23 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure H21 Region R21 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station H24 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX J Representative Inputs to and Outputs from the DYNEV II System

J. REPRESENTATIVE INPUTS TO AND OUTPUTS FROM THE DYNEV II SYSTEM This appendix presents data input to and output from the DYNEV II System. Table J1 provides the volume and queues for the ten highest volume signalized intersections in the study area.

Refer to Table K2 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each intersection.

Table J2 provides source (vehicle loading) and destination information for several roadway segments (links) in the analysis network. Refer to Table K1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.

Table J3 provides network-wide statistics (average travel time, average speed and number of vehicles) for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) for each scenario. Scenario 11, which is the special event, exhibits a significantly lower average speed and longer average travel time than Scenario 3. Scenario 12, the roadway closure, also exhibits a lower average speed and a longer average travel time than Scenario 1.

Table J4 provides statistics (average speed and travel time) for the major evacuation routes - I 5 NB, I5 SB, and SR1 NB - for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) under Scenario 1 conditions. As discussed in Section 7.3 and shown in Figures 73 through 79, I5 southbound is never congested, as such its speeds are barely impacted by the evacuation. I5 northbound and SR1 are two major evacuation routes out of the EPZ and experience lower travel speeds and higher travel times during the first 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> of the evacuation.

Table J5 provides the number of vehicles discharged and the cumulative percent of total vehicles discharged for each link exiting the analysis network, for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) under Scenario 1 conditions. Refer to Table K1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.

Figure J1 through Figure J13 plot the trip generation time versus the ETE for each of the 13 Scenarios considered. The distance between the trip generation and ETE curves is the travel time. Plots of trip generation versus ETE are indicative of the level of traffic congestion during evacuation. For low population density sites, the curves are close together, indicating short travel times and minimal traffic congestion. For higher population density sites, the curves are farther apart indicating longer travel times and the presence of traffic congestion. As seen in Figure J1 through Figure J13, the curves are spatially separated as a result of the pronounced traffic congestion in the EPZ, which was discussed in detail in Section 7.3. The travel time during peak congestion for Scenario 1 is about 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> and 45 minutes.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table J1. Characteristics of the Ten Highest Volume Signalized Intersections Max.

Approach Total Turn Intersection (Up Volume Queue Node Location Control Node) (Veh) (Veh) 1537 10,293 94 Golden Lantern & Crown Valley Actuated 1469 4,023 62 300 Pkwy Signal 302 2,566 0 TOTAL 16,882 1541 13,587 0 Actuated 996 Aliso Creek Rd & Alicia Pkwy 1488 2,558 0 Signal TOTAL 16,145 1466 10,878 249 Actuated 454 2,298 34 1465 Moulton Pkwy & Rancho Niguel Rd Signal 1477 2,159 126 TOTAL 15,335 1508 8,368 62 Actuated 1480 2,559 61 1010 Moulton Pkwy & Oso Pkwy Signal 1042 4,025 0 TOTAL 14,952 449 13,169 44 Actuated 1008 1,549 4 1006 Moulton Pkwy & Aliso Creek Rd Signal 1483 0 0 TOTAL 14,718 443 13,593 0 Actuated 995 Alicia Pkwy & Kite Hill Dr 1542 0 0 Signal TOTAL 13,593 441 13,588 0 Actuated 443 Alicia Pkwy & Highlands Ave 1543 0 0 Signal TOTAL 13,588 439 13,483 0 Actuated 441 Alicia Pkwy & Kite Hill Dr 1544 68 0 Signal TOTAL 13,551 432 8,978 156 Actuated 1553 4,247 135 437 Alicia Pkwy & Niguel Rd Signal 1545 254 7 TOTAL 13,479 1525 5,894 0 Actuated 1021 Aliso Creek Rd & Pacific Park Dr 1022 7,367 0 Signal TOTAL 13,261 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table J2. Sample Simulation Model Input Vehicles Entering Link Network Directional Destination Destination Number on this Link Preference Nodes Capacity 8002 3,810 178 59 SE 8003 9,000 8014 3,810 8057 9,000 597 91 NW 8087 1,250 8497 5,715 8057 9,000 960 274 NW 8087 1,250 8497 5,715 8087 1,250 1258 138 N 8037 5,715 8497 5,715 8057 9,000 1515 254 NW 8087 1,250 8496 5,715 1640 34 N 8032 3,810 8057 9,000 1741 942 NW 8087 1,250 8497 5,715 8087 1,250 1948 91 NW 8496 5,715 8041 5,715 8057 9,000 2094 592 NW 8087 1,250 8496 5,715 8057 9,000 1603 276 NW 8087 1,250 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table J3. Selected Model Outputs for the Evacuation of the Entire EPZ (Region R03)

Scenario 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NetworkWide Average 4.5 5.1 4.2 4.9 4.3 4.6 5.2 Travel Time (Min/VehMi)

NetworkWide Average 13.3 11.7 14.2 12.4 14.0 13.1 11.5 Speed (mph)

Total Vehicles 139,076 138,932 120,753 120,822 109,872 138,192 137,586 Exiting Network Scenario 8 9 10 11 12 13 NetworkWide Average 4.1 4.7 4.2 5.0 5.5 13.3 Travel Time (Min/VehMi)

NetworkWide Average 14.7 12.8 14.4 12.1 10.9 4.5 Speed (mph)

Total Vehicles 117,059 117,098 107,863 191,861 138,485 130,246 Exiting Network San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table J4. Average Speed (mph) and Travel Time (min) for Major Evacuation Routes (Region R03, Scenario 1)

Elapsed Time (hours) 1 2 3 4 5 6 Travel Length Speed Time Travel Travel Travel Travel Travel Route (miles) (mph) (min) Speed Time Speed Time Speed Time Speed Time Speed Time I5 SB 15.4 68.6 13.5 67.5 13.7 70.0 13.2 70.0 13.2 70.0 13.2 70.0 13.2 I5 NB 17.4 18.1 57.6 15.5 67.5 22.9 45.7 33.1 31.5 69.4 15.0 70.0 14.9 SR1 NB 6.5 8.7 44.3 18.9 20.5 35.9 10.8 35.5 10.9 35.1 11.0 38.9 9.9 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table J5. Simulation Model Outputs at Network Exit Links for Region R03, Scenario 1 Elapsed Time (hours)

Network 1 2 3 4 5 6 Exit Link Cumulative Vehicles Discharged by the Indicated Time Cumulative Percent of Vehicles Discharged by the Indicated Time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

133 506 888 1,072 1,186 1,234 16 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

215 665 1,115 1,294 1,375 1,426 21 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

6,795 9,685 10,662 11,046 11,308 11,392 27 22% 14% 11% 9% 9% 8%

8,575 19,342 28,262 35,149 40,235 43,963 174 28% 28% 29% 30% 31% 32%

463 1,567 2,120 2,293 2,305 2,306 285 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%

46 61 66 67 67 67 386 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

474 1,095 1,383 1,416 1,433 1,434 453 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1%

388 1,187 1,856 2,058 2,115 2,131 1275 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%

2,306 6,502 9,589 10,404 10,644 10,740 1276 8% 9% 10% 9% 8% 8%

2,229 5,547 8,173 9,040 9,390 9,542 1314 7% 8% 8% 8% 7% 7%

2 2 2 2 2 2 1319 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

282 1,426 2,028 2,216 2,230 2,231 1324 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%

6,279 14,115 22,748 30,223 35,187 38,088 1360 21% 21% 23% 26% 27% 28%

312 903 1,396 1,825 2,260 2,671 1406 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2%

521 1,415 2,134 2,724 3,286 3,904 1408 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3%

3 15 21 21 21 21 1413 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Elapsed Time (hours)

Network 1 2 3 4 5 6 Exit Link Cumulative Vehicles Discharged by the Indicated Time Cumulative Percent of Vehicles Discharged by the Indicated Time 4 24 34 35 35 35 1426 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

24 141 193 200 202 202 1636 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

62 350 479 500 506 506 1794 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%

912 2,967 3,815 4,304 4,469 4,499 1871 3% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3%

426 1,202 1,513 1,621 1,661 1,666 1873 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1%

8 45 61 63 64 64 2101 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 1)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J1. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 1)

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J2. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 3)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J3. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 3)

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J4. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 5)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J5. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 5)

ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 6)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J6. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 6)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J7. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)

ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 8)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J8. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 8)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 9)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J9. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 9)

ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 10)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J10. ETE and Trip Generation: Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 10)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good, Special Event (Scenario 11)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J11. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather, Special Event (Scenario 11)

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good, Roadway Impact (Scenario 12)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480 510 540 570 600 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J12. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Roadway Impact (Scenario 12)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good, Earthquake (Scenario 13)

Trip Generation ETE 100%

Percent of Total Vehicles 80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 Elapsed Time (min)

Figure J13. ETE and Trip Generation: Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Earthquake (Scenario 13)

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station J14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX K Evacuation Roadway Network

K. EVACUATION ROADWAY NETWORK As discussed in Section 1.3, a linknode analysis network was constructed to model the roadway network within the study area. Figure K1 provides an overview of the linknode analysis network. The figure has been divided up into 36 more detailed figures (Figure K2 through Figure K37) which show each of the links and nodes in the network.

The analysis network was calibrated using the observations made during the field survey conducted in January 2012. Table K1 lists the characteristics of each roadway section modeled in the ETE analysis. Each link is identified by its road name and the upstream and downstream node numbers. The geographic location of each link can be observed by referencing the map (Figure K2 through Figure K37) corresponding to the grid number provided in Table K1. The roadway identified in Table K1 is generally based on the following criteria:

Freeway: limited access highway, 2 or more lanes in each direction, high free flow speeds Freeway ramp: ramp on to or off of a limited access highway Major arterial: 3 or more lanes in each direction Minor arterial: 2 or more lanes in each direction Collector: single lane in each direction Local roadways: single lane in each direction, local roads with low free flow speeds The term, No. of Lanes in Table K1 identifies the number of lanes that extend throughout the length of the link. Many links have additional lanes on the immediate approach to an intersection (turn pockets); these have been recorded and entered into the input stream for the DYNEV II System.

As discussed in Section 1.3, lane width and shoulder width were not physically measured during the road survey. Rather, estimates of these measures were based on visual observations and recorded images.

Table K2 identifies each node in the network that is controlled and the type of control (stop sign, yield sign, pretimed signal, actuated signal, traffic control point) at that node.

Uncontrolled nodes are not included in Table K2. The geographic location of each node can be observed by referencing the map (Figure K2 through Figure K37) corresponding to the grid number provided in Table K2.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K1. Overview of Link Node Analysis San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K2. Grid 1 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K3. Grid 2 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K4. Grid 3 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K5. Grid 4 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K6. Grid 5 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K7. Grid 6 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K8. Grid 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K9. Grid 8 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K10. Grid 9 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K11. Grid 10 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K12. Grid 11 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K13. Grid 12 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K14. Grid 13 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K15. Grid 14 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K16. Grid 15 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K17. Grid 16 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K18. Grid 17 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K19 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K19. Grid 18 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K20 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K20. Grid 19 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K21 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K21. Grid 20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K22 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K22. Grid 21 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K23 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K23. Grid 22 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K24 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K24. Grid 23 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K25 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K25. Grid 24 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K26 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K26. Grid 25 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K27 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K27. Grid 26 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K28 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K28. Grid 27 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K29 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K29. Grid 28 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K30 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K30. Grid 29 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K31 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K31. Grid 30 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K32 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K32. Grid 31 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K33 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K33. Grid 32 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K34 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K34. Grid 33 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K35 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K35. Grid 34 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K36 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K36. Grid 35 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K37 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Figure K37. Grid 36 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K38 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table K1. Evacuation Roadway Network Characteristics Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1 3 4 I5 FREEWAY 1741 4 12 4 2250 70 36 2 3 16 I5 FREEWAY 357 4 12 4 2250 70 36 I 5 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 3 3 1061 EXPY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 438 1 12 4 1700 45 36 4 4 3 I5 FREEWAY 1741 4 12 4 2250 70 36 5 4 87 I5 FREEWAY 857 4 12 4 2250 70 36 6 5 6 I5 FREEWAY 1013 4 12 4 2250 70 36 7 5 87 I5 FREEWAY 779 4 12 4 2250 70 36 8 6 5 I5 FREEWAY 1013 4 12 4 2250 70 36 9 6 7 I5 FREEWAY 2721 4 12 4 2250 70 36 10 7 6 I5 FREEWAY 2721 4 12 4 2250 70 36 11 7 8 I5 FREEWAY 1077 4 12 4 2250 70 36 12 8 7 I5 FREEWAY 1077 4 12 4 2250 70 36 13 8 9 I5 FREEWAY 1980 4 12 4 2250 70 36 14 9 8 I5 FREEWAY 1980 4 12 4 2250 70 36 15 9 18 I5 FREEWAY 2489 4 12 4 2250 70 36 16 10 2 N. COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 262 2 12 0 1900 40 36 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 17 10 11 EXPY MAJOR ARTERIAL 458 2 12 4 1900 55 36 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 18 11 1061 EXPY MAJOR ARTERIAL 285 2 12 4 1900 55 36 I 5 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 19 11 1064 EXPY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 612 2 12 4 1900 45 36 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 20 12 13 EXPY MAJOR ARTERIAL 697 2 12 4 1900 55 36 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K39 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number SAN LUIS REY MISSION 21 13 14 EXPY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2434 2 12 4 1900 55 36 I 5 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 22 15 12 EXPY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 252 1 12 4 1900 45 36 23 16 3 I5 FREEWAY 356 4 12 4 2250 70 36 24 16 17 I5 FREEWAY 977 4 12 4 2250 70 36 I 5 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 25 16 1061 EXPY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 819 1 12 4 1700 45 36 26 17 16 I5 FREEWAY 977 4 12 4 2250 70 36 27 17 1735 I5 FREEWAY 352 4 12 4 2250 70 36 28 18 9 I5 FREEWAY 2489 4 12 4 2250 70 36 29 18 19 I5 FREEWAY 2283 4 12 4 2250 70 33 30 19 18 I5 FREEWAY 2283 4 12 4 2250 70 33 31 19 20 I5 FREEWAY 2150 4 12 4 2250 70 33 32 20 19 I5 FREEWAY 2150 4 12 4 2250 70 33 33 20 21 I5 FREEWAY 1367 4 12 4 2250 70 33 34 21 20 I5 FREEWAY 1367 4 12 4 2250 70 33 35 21 22 I5 FREEWAY 1093 4 12 4 2250 70 33 36 22 21 I5 FREEWAY 1093 4 12 4 2250 70 33 37 22 23 I5 FREEWAY 2540 4 12 4 2250 70 33 38 23 22 I5 FREEWAY 2540 4 12 4 2250 70 33 39 23 24 I5 FREEWAY 2407 4 12 4 2250 70 33 40 24 23 I5 FREEWAY 2407 4 12 4 2250 70 33 41 24 25 I5 FREEWAY 2362 4 12 4 2250 70 33 42 25 24 I5 FREEWAY 2362 4 12 4 2250 70 33 43 25 26 I5 FREEWAY 2095 4 12 4 2250 70 33 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K40 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 44 26 25 I5 FREEWAY 2095 4 12 4 2250 70 33 45 26 27 I5 FREEWAY 2108 4 12 4 2250 70 33 46 27 26 I5 FREEWAY 2108 4 12 4 2250 70 33 47 27 28 I5 FREEWAY 2278 4 12 4 2250 70 30 48 28 27 I5 FREEWAY 2278 4 12 4 2250 70 30 49 28 29 I5 FREEWAY 2656 4 12 4 2250 70 30 50 29 28 I5 FREEWAY 2656 4 12 4 2250 70 30 51 29 30 I5 FREEWAY 2317 4 12 4 2250 70 30 52 30 29 I5 FREEWAY 2317 4 12 4 2250 70 30 53 30 31 I5 FREEWAY 2038 4 12 4 2250 70 30 54 31 30 I5 FREEWAY 2038 4 12 4 2250 70 30 55 31 32 I5 FREEWAY 1791 4 12 4 2250 70 30 56 32 31 I5 FREEWAY 1791 4 12 4 2250 70 30 57 32 95 I5 FREEWAY 1271 4 12 4 2250 70 30 58 33 34 I5 FREEWAY 2820 4 12 4 2250 70 30 59 33 95 I5 FREEWAY 3445 4 12 4 2250 70 30 60 34 33 I5 FREEWAY 2820 4 12 4 2250 70 30 61 34 35 I5 FREEWAY 1639 4 12 4 2250 70 30 62 35 34 I5 FREEWAY 1643 4 12 4 2250 70 30 63 35 36 I5 FREEWAY 1356 4 12 4 2250 70 30 64 36 35 I5 FREEWAY 1356 4 12 4 2250 70 30 65 36 37 I5 FREEWAY 1511 4 12 4 2250 70 30 66 37 36 I5 FREEWAY 1499 4 12 4 2250 70 30 67 37 38 I5 FREEWAY 2773 4 12 4 2250 70 30 68 38 37 I5 FREEWAY 2773 4 12 4 2250 70 30 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K41 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 69 38 39 I5 FREEWAY 2406 4 12 4 2250 70 29 70 39 38 I5 FREEWAY 2406 4 12 4 2250 70 29 71 39 40 I5 FREEWAY 7520 4 12 4 2250 70 29 72 40 39 I5 FREEWAY 7520 4 12 4 2250 70 29 73 40 41 I5 FREEWAY 7839 4 12 4 2250 70 25 74 41 40 I5 FREEWAY 7839 4 12 4 2250 70 25 75 41 42 I5 FREEWAY 3969 4 12 4 2250 70 25 76 42 41 I5 FREEWAY 3969 4 12 4 2250 70 25 77 42 43 I5 FREEWAY 2652 4 12 4 2250 70 25 78 43 42 I5 FREEWAY 2652 4 12 4 2250 70 25 79 43 44 I5 FREEWAY 3096 4 12 4 2250 70 25 80 44 43 I5 FREEWAY 3096 4 12 4 2250 70 25 81 44 45 I5 FREEWAY 1738 4 12 4 2250 70 25 82 45 44 I5 FREEWAY 1738 4 12 4 2250 70 25 83 45 46 I5 FREEWAY 2873 4 12 4 2250 70 25 84 46 45 I5 FREEWAY 2873 4 12 4 2250 70 25 85 46 47 I5 FREEWAY 2265 4 12 4 2250 70 25 86 47 46 I5 FREEWAY 2265 4 12 4 2250 70 25 87 47 48 I5 FREEWAY 1677 4 12 4 2250 70 24 88 48 47 I5 FREEWAY 1677 4 12 4 2250 70 24 89 48 49 I5 FREEWAY 2096 4 12 4 2250 70 24 90 49 48 I5 FREEWAY 2096 4 12 4 2250 70 24 91 49 102 I5 FREEWAY 1069 4 12 4 2250 70 24 92 50 51 I5 FREEWAY 5141 4 12 4 2250 70 24 93 50 102 I5 FREEWAY 1512 4 12 4 2250 70 24 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K42 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 94 51 52 I5 FREEWAY 1579 4 12 4 2250 70 24 95 51 115 I5 FREEWAY 777 4 12 4 2250 70 24 96 52 51 I5 FREEWAY 1578 4 12 4 2250 70 24 97 52 118 I5 FREEWAY 846 4 12 4 2250 70 24 98 53 54 I5 FREEWAY 1043 4 12 4 2250 70 20 99 53 118 I5 FREEWAY 1286 4 12 4 2250 70 20 100 54 53 I5 FREEWAY 1043 4 12 4 2250 70 20 101 54 55 I5 FREEWAY 1904 4 12 4 2250 70 20 102 55 54 I5 FREEWAY 1904 4 12 4 2250 70 20 103 55 56 I5 FREEWAY 1203 4 12 4 2250 70 20 104 56 55 I5 FREEWAY 1203 5 12 4 2250 70 20 105 56 57 I5 FREEWAY 1064 4 12 4 2250 70 20 106 57 56 I5 FREEWAY 1064 5 12 4 2250 70 20 107 57 58 I5 FREEWAY 2694 4 12 4 2250 70 20 108 58 57 I5 FREEWAY 2692 5 12 4 2250 70 20 109 58 59 I5 FREEWAY 1297 4 12 4 2250 70 20 110 58 121 I 5 AVENIDA PICO RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 650 1 12 4 1900 45 20 111 59 58 I5 FREEWAY 1297 4 12 4 2250 70 20 112 59 60 I5 FREEWAY 1316 5 12 4 2250 70 19 113 59 617 I 5 AVENIDA PICO RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 580 2 12 4 1900 45 20 114 60 59 I5 FREEWAY 1316 4 12 4 2250 70 19 115 60 122 I5 FREEWAY 932 5 12 4 2250 70 19 116 61 62 I5 FREEWAY 1183 4 12 4 2250 70 19 I 5 AVENIDA VISTA 117 61 1250 HERMOSA RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 1171 1 12 0 1900 45 19 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K43 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 118 61 1251 I5 FREEWAY 1250 4 12 4 2250 70 19 119 62 61 I5 FREEWAY 1183 5 12 4 2250 70 19 120 62 63 I5 FREEWAY 2113 4 12 4 2250 70 17 121 63 62 I5 FREEWAY 2113 4 12 4 2250 70 17 122 63 64 I5 FREEWAY 3181 4 12 4 2250 70 17 123 64 63 I5 FREEWAY 3181 4 12 4 2250 70 17 124 64 124 I5 FREEWAY 954 4 12 4 2250 70 17 125 65 66 I5 FREEWAY 1757 5 12 4 2250 70 17 126 65 125 I5 FREEWAY 940 4 12 4 2250 70 17 I 5 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA 127 65 590 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 857 1 12 0 1900 45 17 128 66 65 I5 FREEWAY 1757 4 12 4 2250 70 17 129 66 128 I5 FREEWAY 944 4 12 4 2250 70 17 130 67 68 I5 FREEWAY 816 5 12 4 2250 70 16 131 67 128 I5 FREEWAY 1669 4 12 4 2250 70 17 132 68 67 I5 FREEWAY 816 5 12 4 2250 70 16 133 68 69 I5 FREEWAY 1177 5 12 4 2250 70 16 134 68 131 I 5 SR 1 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 949 1 12 0 1900 45 16 135 69 68 I5 FREEWAY 1177 5 12 4 2250 70 16 136 69 70 I5 FREEWAY 1404 5 12 4 2250 70 16 137 70 69 I5 FREEWAY 1403 5 12 4 2250 70 16 138 70 71 I5 FREEWAY 1335 5 12 4 2250 70 16 139 71 70 I5 FREEWAY 1335 5 12 4 2250 70 16 140 71 72 I5 FREEWAY 2952 5 12 4 2250 70 16 141 72 71 I5 FREEWAY 2951 5 12 4 2250 70 16 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K44 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 142 72 73 I5 FREEWAY 2772 5 12 4 2250 70 12 143 73 72 I5 FREEWAY 2772 5 12 4 2250 70 12 144 73 74 I5 FREEWAY 1691 5 12 4 2250 70 12 145 74 73 I5 FREEWAY 1691 5 12 4 2250 70 12 146 74 1356 I5 FREEWAY 1941 5 12 4 2250 70 12 147 75 76 I5 FREEWAY 1185 5 12 4 2250 70 12 148 75 1356 I5 FREEWAY 770 5 12 4 2250 70 12 149 76 75 I5 FREEWAY 1185 5 12 4 2250 70 12 150 76 77 I5 FREEWAY 4945 6 12 4 2250 70 12 151 76 1357 I 5 SR 74 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 1219 1 12 4 1900 45 12 152 77 76 I5 FREEWAY 4945 6 12 4 2250 70 12 I 5 JUNIPERA SERRA RD 153 77 140 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 767 2 12 4 1900 45 12 154 77 142 I5 FREEWAY 1714 6 12 4 2250 70 12 155 78 79 I5 FREEWAY 1833 7 12 4 2250 70 7 156 78 142 I5 FREEWAY 1549 7 12 4 2250 70 12 157 79 78 I5 FREEWAY 1833 7 12 4 2250 70 7 158 79 80 I5 FREEWAY 1534 7 12 4 2250 70 7 159 80 79 I5 FREEWAY 1537 7 12 4 2250 70 7 160 80 527 I5 FREEWAY 2741 7 12 4 2250 75 7 161 81 150 I5 FREEWAY 1133 5 12 4 2250 70 7 162 81 1417 I5 FREEWAY 661 5 12 4 2250 70 7 163 82 150 I5 FREEWAY 2526 5 12 4 2250 70 7 I 5 CROWN VALLEY PKWY 164 82 153 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 580 1 12 4 1700 45 7 165 82 1453 I5 FREEWAY 589 4 12 4 2250 70 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K45 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 166 83 84 I5 FREEWAY 2576 5 12 4 2250 70 2 I 5 CROWN VALLEY PKWY 167 83 155 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 938 1 12 4 1900 45 2 168 83 1453 I5 FREEWAY 1013 5 12 4 2250 70 7 169 84 83 I5 FREEWAY 2576 5 12 4 2250 70 2 170 84 85 I5 FREEWAY 3194 5 12 4 2250 70 2 171 85 84 I5 FREEWAY 3194 5 12 4 2250 70 2 172 85 160 I5 FREEWAY 1066 5 12 4 2250 70 2 173 86 160 I5 FREEWAY 1086 5 12 4 2250 70 2 174 86 1734 I5 FREEWAY 1038 5 12 4 2250 70 2 175 87 4 I5 FREEWAY 857 4 12 4 2250 70 36 176 87 5 I5 FREEWAY 779 4 12 4 2250 70 36 177 89 1656 HARBOR DR MINOR ARTERIAL 296 2 12 4 1900 45 36 178 90 93 HARBOR DR MINOR ARTERIAL 688 2 12 4 1900 45 36 179 92 1068 HARBOR DR MINOR ARTERIAL 552 2 12 4 1900 45 36 180 93 1067 N. COAST HWY COLLECTOR 286 1 12 0 1125 25 36 I 5 HARBOR DRIVE 181 93 1069 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 295 1 12 4 1700 45 36 182 95 32 I5 FREEWAY 1269 4 12 4 2250 70 30 183 95 33 I5 FREEWAY 3444 4 12 4 2250 70 30 184 96 97 LAS PULGAS RD MINOR ARTERIAL 715 1 12 4 1700 45 30 I 5 LAS PULGAS RD 185 97 32 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 749 1 12 0 1700 45 30 186 98 96 LAS PULGAS RD MINOR ARTERIAL 837 1 12 4 1700 45 30 187 99 48 I 5 BASILONE RD RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 962 1 12 4 1700 45 24 188 99 1144 BASILONE RD MINOR ARTERIAL 559 1 12 0 1700 45 24 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K46 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 189 101 805 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 448 1 12 4 1125 25 24 190 102 49 I5 FREEWAY 1069 4 12 4 2250 70 24 191 102 50 I5 FREEWAY 1512 4 12 4 2250 70 24 192 103 104 CRISTIANITOS RD COLLECTOR 504 1 12 4 1900 45 24 I 5 CRISTIANOS RD 193 103 1169 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 201 2 12 4 1900 45 24 I 5 CRISTIANOS RD 194 104 106 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 313 2 12 4 1900 45 24 I 5 CRISTIANOS RD 195 106 50 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 637 1 12 4 1700 45 24 196 109 104 CRISTIANITOS RD COLLECTOR 206 1 12 4 1900 45 24 197 109 551 S EL CAMINO REAL MINOR ARTERIAL 527 1 12 0 1575 35 24 198 110 103 CRISTIANITOS RD COLLECTOR 218 1 12 4 1700 45 24 199 110 1162 AVENIDA DEL PRESIDENTE COLLECTOR 2960 1 12 4 1900 45 24 I 5 EL CAMINO REAL 200 111 113 RAMP FREEWAY RAMP 394 2 12 4 1900 45 24 201 111 557 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 507 2 12 0 1900 40 24 202 113 52 I 5 EL CAMINO REAL RAMP FREEWAY RAMP 660 1 12 4 1700 45 24 203 114 812 AVENIDA DEL PRESIDENTE COLLECTOR 721 1 12 4 1900 45 24 204 115 50 I5 FREEWAY 4364 4 12 4 2250 70 24 205 117 114 AVENIDA CALIFA COLLECTOR 289 1 12 0 1900 35 24 206 118 52 I5 FREEWAY 846 4 12 4 2250 70 24 207 118 53 I5 FREEWAY 1285 4 12 4 2250 70 20 I 5 EL CAMINO REAL 208 119 814 RAMP FREEWAY RAMP 383 2 12 4 1900 45 20 209 119 1713 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 218 2 12 0 1900 40 20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K47 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number I 5 AVENIDA PRESIDIO 210 120 1179 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 512 2 12 4 1900 45 20 211 121 1200 I 5 AVENIDA PICO RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 358 2 12 4 1900 45 20 212 122 60 I5 FREEWAY 932 4 12 4 2250 70 19 I 5 AVENIDA VISTA 213 122 123 HERMOSA RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 832 1 12 0 1900 45 19 214 122 1251 I5 FREEWAY 430 4 12 4 2250 70 19 215 123 1252 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MAJOR ARTERIAL 264 2 12 0 1900 50 19 216 124 64 I5 FREEWAY 953 4 12 4 2250 70 17 217 124 125 I5 FREEWAY 635 4 12 4 2250 70 17 I 5 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA 218 124 126 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 869 1 12 0 1900 45 17 219 125 65 I5 FREEWAY 940 5 12 4 2250 70 17 220 125 124 I5 FREEWAY 635 4 12 4 2250 70 17 I 5 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA 221 126 125 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 606 1 12 0 1575 35 17 222 126 127 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 261 3 12 0 1900 35 17 223 127 126 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 261 1 12 0 1900 35 17 224 127 590 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 484 2 12 0 1900 35 17 I 5 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA 225 127 1280 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 539 2 12 0 1900 45 17 226 128 66 I5 FREEWAY 943 4 12 4 2250 70 17 227 128 67 I5 FREEWAY 1669 4 12 4 2250 70 17 228 130 132 I 5 SR 1 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 706 1 12 0 1700 45 16 229 130 135 CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS MINOR ARTERIAL 181 2 12 4 1900 45 17 230 131 134 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 417 3 12 4 1900 45 16 231 131 250 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 238 1 12 4 1700 55 16 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K48 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 232 132 1284 I 5 SR 1 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 395 2 12 0 1900 45 16 233 133 132 I 5 SR 1 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 564 1 12 0 1700 45 16 234 134 131 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 417 1 12 4 1900 45 16 235 134 135 CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS MINOR ARTERIAL 477 1 12 4 1700 45 16 236 135 133 I 5 SR 1 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 335 1 12 0 1350 30 17 237 135 134 CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS MINOR ARTERIAL 477 2 12 4 1900 45 16 238 136 137 I 5 LA NOVIA AVE RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 372 2 12 4 1900 30 12 239 137 1409 I 5 LA NOVIA AVE RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 476 2 12 4 1900 45 12 240 138 1413 I 5 SR 74 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 701 2 12 4 1900 45 12 241 138 1724 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 373 2 12 0 1900 45 12 242 139 487 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1102 2 12 0 1900 45 12 243 139 1724 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 541 3 12 0 1900 45 12 I 5 JUNIPERA SERRA RD 244 140 145 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 414 2 12 4 1900 45 12 245 141 140 JUNIPERA SERRA RD MINOR ARTERIAL 236 1 12 0 1900 35 12 246 141 494 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1441 2 12 0 1900 50 12 247 142 77 I5 FREEWAY 1714 6 12 4 2250 70 12 248 142 78 I5 FREEWAY 1549 7 12 4 2250 70 12 I 5 JUNIPERA SERRA RD 249 142 143 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 982 1 12 4 1900 45 12 250 143 1729 JUNIPERA SERRA RD MINOR ARTERIAL 420 2 12 0 1900 35 12 251 144 1391 JUNIPERA SERRA RD MINOR ARTERIAL 485 2 12 0 1900 35 12 252 144 1728 CAMINO CAPISTRANO FREEWAY 2256 1 12 10 1700 45 12 I 5 JUNIPERA SERRA RD 253 145 142 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 621 1 12 4 1700 45 12 254 146 147 AVERY PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 392 2 12 4 1900 30 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K49 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 255 146 149 I 5 AVERY PKWY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 592 2 12 4 1900 45 7 256 147 146 AVERY PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 391 1 12 0 1900 40 7 257 147 506 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 786 2 12 0 1900 45 7 258 148 146 AVERY PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 480 2 12 0 1900 40 7 259 149 150 I 5 AVERY PKWY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 505 1 12 4 1700 45 7 260 150 81 I5 FREEWAY 1133 5 12 4 2250 70 7 261 150 82 I5 FREEWAY 2526 5 12 4 2250 70 7 262 150 148 I 5 AVERY PKWY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 1132 1 12 4 1900 45 7 263 151 475 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 700 4 12 0 1900 50 2 264 151 1455 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 185 4 12 4 1900 50 7 265 152 151 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 314 4 12 4 1900 50 7 266 152 155 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 544 3 12 4 1900 50 7 I 5 CROWN VALLEY PKWY 267 153 152 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 422 3 12 4 1900 45 7 I 5 CROWN VALLEY PKWY 268 153 1453 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 542 1 12 0 1350 30 7 I 5 CROWN VALLEY PKWY 269 154 83 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 226 1 12 4 1700 45 2 270 155 1454 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 438 4 12 4 1900 50 7 271 155 1458 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 931 3 12 4 1900 50 7 272 157 158 I 5 OSO PKWY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 380 2 12 0 1900 45 3 273 157 162 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1055 3 12 4 1900 55 2 274 157 1501 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 331 3 12 4 1900 55 3 275 158 157 I 5 OSO PKWY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 380 3 12 0 1900 45 3 276 158 159 I 5 OSO PKWY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 596 2 12 0 1900 30 3 277 159 160 I 5 OSO PKWY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 717 1 12 0 1700 45 2 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K50 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 278 160 85 I5 FREEWAY 1065 5 12 4 2250 70 2 279 160 86 I5 FREEWAY 1085 5 12 4 2250 70 2 280 161 86 I 5 OSO PKWY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 619 1 12 0 1700 45 2 281 162 157 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1056 3 12 4 1900 55 2 282 162 163 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 482 3 12 4 1900 55 2 283 163 162 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 482 3 12 4 1900 55 2 284 163 1044 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2415 3 12 4 1900 55 2 285 163 1503 CABOT RD MINOR ARTERIAL 507 2 12 4 1900 50 2 286 164 165 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 784 2 12 0 1900 45 13 287 164 201 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 430 2 12 0 1900 45 13 288 164 818 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 478 3 12 8 1900 55 13 289 165 164 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 784 2 12 0 1900 45 13 290 165 166 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1207 2 12 0 1900 45 13 291 166 165 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1207 2 12 0 1900 45 13 292 166 167 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 908 2 12 0 1900 45 12 293 167 166 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 908 2 12 0 1900 45 12 294 167 168 SR 74 COLLECTOR 718 1 12 0 1700 45 12 295 168 167 SR 74 COLLECTOR 718 1 12 0 1700 45 12 296 168 169 SR 74 COLLECTOR 571 1 12 0 1700 45 12 297 169 168 SR 74 COLLECTOR 571 1 12 0 1700 45 12 298 169 170 SR 74 COLLECTOR 811 1 12 0 1700 45 12 299 170 169 SR 74 COLLECTOR 811 1 12 0 1700 45 12 300 170 171 SR 74 COLLECTOR 997 1 12 0 1700 45 12 301 171 170 SR 74 COLLECTOR 997 1 12 0 1700 45 12 302 171 172 SR 74 COLLECTOR 981 1 12 0 1700 45 12 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K51 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 303 172 171 SR 74 COLLECTOR 981 1 12 0 1700 45 12 304 172 173 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 717 2 12 0 1900 45 12 305 173 172 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 717 2 12 0 1900 45 12 306 173 174 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 609 2 12 0 1900 45 12 307 174 173 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 609 2 12 0 1900 45 12 308 174 175 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 905 2 12 0 1900 45 12 309 175 174 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 905 2 12 0 1900 45 12 310 175 176 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 744 2 12 0 1900 45 12 311 176 175 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 744 2 12 0 1900 45 12 312 176 177 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1061 2 12 0 1900 45 12 313 177 176 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1061 2 12 0 1900 45 12 314 177 178 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 868 2 12 0 1900 45 12 315 178 139 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 536 2 12 0 1900 45 12 316 179 180 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 893 2 12 8 1900 55 13 317 180 181 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 640 2 12 8 1900 55 13 318 181 182 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 622 2 12 8 1900 55 9 319 182 183 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 668 2 12 8 1900 55 9 320 183 184 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 607 2 12 8 1900 55 9 321 184 185 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1410 2 12 8 1900 55 9 322 185 186 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 837 2 12 8 1900 55 9 323 186 187 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1592 3 12 8 1900 55 8 324 187 188 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1947 3 12 8 1900 55 8 325 188 189 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 543 3 12 8 1900 55 8 326 189 190 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1793 3 12 8 1900 55 8 327 190 191 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1596 3 12 8 1900 55 8 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K52 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 328 191 192 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 662 3 12 8 1900 55 8 329 192 193 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 893 3 12 8 1900 55 8 330 193 194 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 701 3 12 8 1900 55 3 331 194 195 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1255 3 12 8 1900 55 3 332 195 196 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 812 3 12 8 1900 55 3 333 195 486 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 983 3 12 4 1900 60 3 334 196 197 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1104 3 12 8 1900 55 3 335 197 198 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 793 3 12 8 1900 55 3 336 198 199 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1097 3 12 8 1900 55 3 337 199 200 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1097 3 12 8 1900 55 3 338 200 1029 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2217 3 12 8 1900 55 3 339 201 202 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 745 2 12 0 1900 45 13 340 202 203 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1021 1 12 0 1700 45 13 341 203 204 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1014 1 12 2 1700 55 13 342 204 205 SR 74 COLLECTOR 645 1 12 2 1700 55 13 343 205 206 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1161 1 12 2 1700 55 13 344 206 207 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1296 1 12 2 1700 55 13 345 207 208 SR 74 COLLECTOR 2740 1 12 2 1700 55 13 346 208 209 SR 74 COLLECTOR 577 1 12 2 1700 55 13 347 209 210 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1300 1 12 2 1700 55 13 348 210 211 SR 74 COLLECTOR 813 1 12 2 1700 55 13 349 211 212 SR 74 COLLECTOR 720 1 12 2 1700 55 13 350 212 213 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1372 1 12 2 1700 55 14 351 213 214 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1319 1 12 2 1700 55 14 352 214 215 SR 74 COLLECTOR 910 1 12 2 1700 55 14 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K53 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 353 215 216 SR 74 COLLECTOR 849 1 12 2 1700 55 14 354 216 217 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1069 1 12 2 1700 55 14 355 217 218 SR 74 COLLECTOR 802 1 12 2 1700 55 14 356 218 219 SR 74 COLLECTOR 899 1 12 2 1700 55 14 357 219 220 SR 74 COLLECTOR 687 1 12 2 1700 55 14 358 220 221 SR 74 COLLECTOR 699 1 12 2 1700 55 14 359 221 222 SR 74 COLLECTOR 717 1 12 2 1700 55 14 360 222 223 SR 74 COLLECTOR 942 1 12 2 1700 55 14 361 223 224 SR 74 COLLECTOR 634 1 12 2 1700 55 14 362 224 225 SR 74 COLLECTOR 915 1 12 2 1700 55 14 363 225 226 SR 74 COLLECTOR 671 1 12 2 1700 55 14 364 226 227 SR 74 COLLECTOR 678 1 12 2 1700 55 14 365 227 228 SR 74 COLLECTOR 885 1 12 2 1700 55 14 366 228 229 SR 74 COLLECTOR 996 1 12 2 1700 55 14 367 229 230 SR 74 COLLECTOR 907 1 12 2 1700 55 14 368 230 231 SR 74 COLLECTOR 728 1 12 2 1700 55 14 369 231 232 SR 74 COLLECTOR 711 1 12 2 1700 55 14 370 232 233 SR 74 COLLECTOR 957 1 12 2 1700 55 14 371 233 234 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1315 1 12 2 1700 55 14 372 234 235 SR 74 COLLECTOR 2028 1 12 2 1700 55 14 373 235 236 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1010 1 12 2 1700 55 14 374 236 237 SR 74 COLLECTOR 2305 1 12 2 1750 55 14 375 237 238 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1091 1 12 2 1700 55 5 376 238 239 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1435 1 12 2 1700 55 5 377 239 240 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1301 1 12 2 1700 55 5 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K54 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 378 240 241 SR 74 COLLECTOR 748 1 12 2 1700 55 5 379 241 242 SR 74 COLLECTOR 955 1 12 2 1700 55 5 380 242 243 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1040 1 12 2 1700 55 5 381 243 244 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1328 1 12 2 1700 55 5 382 244 245 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1238 1 12 2 1700 55 5 383 245 246 SR 74 COLLECTOR 1245 1 12 2 1700 55 5 384 246 247 SR 74 COLLECTOR 735 1 12 2 1700 55 5 385 247 248 SR 74 COLLECTOR 664 1 12 2 1700 55 5 386 248 249 SR 74 COLLECTOR 811 1 12 2 1700 55 5 387 250 131 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 238 2 12 4 1900 55 16 388 250 251 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1159 2 12 4 1900 55 16 389 251 250 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1157 2 12 4 1900 55 16 390 251 252 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 689 2 12 4 1900 55 16 391 252 251 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 689 2 12 4 1900 55 16 392 252 253 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 323 2 12 4 1900 55 16 393 252 560 SR 1 DOHENY RD RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 1004 1 12 4 1900 45 16 394 253 252 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 323 2 12 4 1900 55 16 395 253 550 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 719 2 12 4 1900 55 16 396 254 255 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1314 3 12 4 1900 55 16 397 254 550 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 397 2 12 4 1900 55 16 398 255 254 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1314 2 12 4 1900 55 16 399 255 256 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 909 3 12 4 1900 45 16 SR 1 COAST HWY 400 255 1707 CONNECTOR COLLECTOR 1104 1 12 0 1700 40 16 401 256 255 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 909 3 12 4 1900 55 16 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K55 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 402 256 1308 DANA POINT HARBOR DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 621 2 12 4 1900 40 16 403 256 1324 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 1095 2 12 0 1900 40 16 404 256 1636 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 644 3 12 0 1900 45 16 405 257 1636 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 282 3 12 0 1900 45 16 406 257 1637 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 290 2 12 0 1900 45 16 407 258 259 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 250 2 12 4 1900 40 16 408 258 1318 ST OF COPPER LANTERN LOCAL ROADWAY 884 1 12 0 1350 30 16 409 258 1637 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 857 2 12 0 1900 45 16 410 259 260 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1045 3 12 4 1900 40 16 411 260 261 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 704 3 12 4 1900 40 16 412 260 1689 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 243 2 12 4 1900 35 16 413 261 262 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 621 3 12 4 1900 40 16 414 261 265 VIOLET LANTERN ST LOCAL ROADWAY 460 1 12 0 1900 30 16 ST OF THE AMBER 415 262 264 LANTERN COLLECTOR 354 1 12 0 1900 30 16 416 262 1641 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 740 3 12 4 1900 40 16 417 263 267 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 516 2 12 4 1900 40 15 STREET OF THE BLUE 418 263 1322 LANTERN COLLECTOR 1417 1 12 0 1350 30 16 419 263 1640 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 834 2 12 4 1900 35 16 ST OF THE AMBER 420 264 262 LANTERN COLLECTOR 354 1 12 0 1900 30 16 421 264 265 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 621 3 12 4 1900 35 16 422 265 261 VIOLET LANTERN ST LOCAL ROADWAY 460 1 12 0 1900 30 16 423 265 1711 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 537 3 12 4 1900 35 16 424 266 260 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 673 2 12 4 1900 35 16 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K56 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 425 266 1639 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 417 4 12 4 1900 35 16 426 267 263 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 516 2 12 4 1900 40 15 427 267 268 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 525 3 12 4 1900 40 15 428 268 267 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 525 2 12 4 1900 40 15 429 268 269 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1723 2 12 4 1900 50 15 430 269 268 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1723 2 12 4 1900 50 15 431 269 270 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 2151 2 12 4 1900 50 15 432 270 269 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 2151 2 12 4 1900 50 15 433 270 271 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 2104 2 12 4 1900 50 15 434 270 1598 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 679 2 12 4 1900 45 15 435 271 270 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 2104 2 12 4 1900 50 15 436 271 1645 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 2209 2 12 4 1900 50 15 437 272 273 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 3146 2 12 4 1900 45 10 438 272 281 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 520 2 12 0 1900 35 10 439 272 1645 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 861 2 12 4 1900 45 15 440 273 272 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 3146 2 12 4 1900 45 10 441 273 274 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 609 2 12 4 1900 45 10 442 274 273 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 609 2 12 4 1900 45 10 443 274 275 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 2050 2 12 4 1900 45 10 444 275 274 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 2050 2 12 4 1900 45 10 445 275 276 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 729 2 12 4 1900 35 10 446 276 275 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 728 2 12 4 1900 35 10 447 276 277 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1138 2 12 4 1900 35 10 448 277 276 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1138 2 12 4 1900 35 10 449 277 278 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1277 2 12 4 1900 35 10 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K57 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 450 278 277 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1277 2 12 4 1900 35 10 451 278 279 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 2600 2 12 4 1900 45 10 452 279 278 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 2605 2 12 4 1900 45 10 453 279 280 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1223 2 12 4 1900 45 10 454 280 279 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 1223 2 12 4 1900 45 10 455 281 272 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 518 2 12 0 1900 35 10 456 281 283 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1441 2 12 0 1900 35 15 457 283 281 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1390 2 12 0 1900 35 15 458 283 285 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2490 3 12 4 1900 45 10 459 285 283 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2490 2 12 4 1900 45 10 460 285 287 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2681 3 12 4 1900 50 10 461 285 419 PACIFIC ISLAND DR MINOR ARTERIAL 645 2 12 4 1900 45 10 462 287 289 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2729 3 12 4 1900 50 10 463 289 291 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1030 3 12 4 1900 50 10 464 291 1547 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 3932 3 12 4 1900 50 10 465 291 1549 CLUBHOUSE DR COLLECTOR 1021 1 12 0 1575 35 10 466 294 1553 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1049 2 12 4 1900 45 6 467 294 1672 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 544 3 12 4 1900 45 6 468 296 1555 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 989 3 12 4 1900 45 7 469 296 1559 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1783 3 12 4 1900 45 7 470 298 450 LA PAZ RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1621 2 12 4 1900 45 7 471 298 1470 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 815 3 12 4 1900 45 7 472 298 1559 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1081 3 12 4 1900 45 7 473 300 302 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2874 3 12 4 1900 50 7 474 300 1466 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1813 3 12 4 1900 50 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K58 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 475 300 1469 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1427 3 12 4 1900 45 7 476 302 300 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2868 3 12 4 1900 50 7 477 302 304 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1496 3 12 4 1900 50 7 478 304 302 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1508 3 12 4 1900 50 7 479 304 308 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2464 3 12 4 1900 50 7 480 304 1464 GREENFIELD DR MINOR ARTERIAL 777 3 12 0 1900 40 7 SJHTC GREENFIELD DR 481 306 1479 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 870 2 12 4 1900 45 7 482 308 304 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2489 3 12 4 1900 50 7 483 308 469 CABOT RD MINOR ARTERIAL 789 2 12 4 1900 50 7 484 308 1458 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 862 4 12 4 1900 50 7 485 310 344 GOLDEN LANTERN MAJOR ARTERIAL 949 3 12 4 1900 50 11 486 310 1601 CAMINO DEL AVION MINOR ARTERIAL 550 2 12 0 1900 40 11 487 313 310 CAMINO DEL AVION MINOR ARTERIAL 796 2 12 0 1900 45 11 488 316 313 CAMINO DEL AVION MINOR ARTERIAL 1776 2 12 0 1900 45 11 489 317 316 CAMINO DEL AVION MINOR ARTERIAL 2255 2 12 0 1900 45 16 490 317 1690 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 770 2 12 0 1900 45 16 491 317 1712 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 422 2 12 0 1900 40 11 492 319 1624 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 527 2 12 0 1900 40 11 493 319 1712 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 2073 2 12 0 1900 40 11 494 320 323 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 440 2 12 0 1900 40 11 495 320 1624 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 739 1 12 0 1700 40 11 496 323 320 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 440 1 12 0 1700 40 11 497 323 324 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 916 2 12 0 1900 40 11 498 324 323 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 916 1 12 0 1900 40 11 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K59 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 499 324 1623 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 522 2 12 0 1900 40 11 500 328 331 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 493 2 12 0 1900 40 12 501 328 1352 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 1145 2 12 0 1900 35 12 502 329 1354 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 260 2 12 0 1900 35 12 503 329 1396 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 1108 1 12 0 1900 35 12 504 330 1412 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 197 2 12 0 1900 40 12 505 330 1723 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 214 3 12 0 1900 35 12 506 331 332 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 554 2 12 0 1900 40 12 507 332 330 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 931 2 12 0 1900 40 12 508 335 338 CAMINO DEL AVION MINOR ARTERIAL 2758 2 12 0 1900 50 11 509 338 1589 CAMINO DEL AVION MINOR ARTERIAL 976 2 12 0 1900 45 10 510 338 1592 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 638 3 12 4 1900 45 10 511 341 285 CAMINO DEL AVION MINOR ARTERIAL 978 2 12 0 1900 45 10 512 344 346 GOLDEN LANTERN MAJOR ARTERIAL 2707 3 12 4 1900 50 11 513 346 348 GOLDEN LANTERN MAJOR ARTERIAL 1538 3 12 4 1900 50 11 514 348 1613 GOLDEN LANTERN MAJOR ARTERIAL 1671 3 12 4 1900 50 11 515 350 352 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 3000 2 12 4 1900 50 11 516 352 355 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 1021 2 12 4 1900 50 11 517 355 1615 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 1075 2 12 4 1900 45 11 518 357 418 GOLDEN LANTERN MAJOR ARTERIAL 973 3 12 4 1900 50 11 519 360 361 GOLDEN LANTERN MAJOR ARTERIAL 939 3 12 4 1900 50 7 520 361 456 PASEO DE LA COLINAS MINOR ARTERIAL 712 2 12 4 1900 45 7 521 361 1537 GOLDEN LANTERN MAJOR ARTERIAL 601 3 12 4 1900 50 7 522 366 368 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1596 2 12 4 1900 45 10 523 368 370 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1304 2 12 4 1900 45 10 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K60 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 524 370 372 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1881 2 12 4 1900 45 10 525 372 373 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1665 2 12 4 1900 45 11 526 373 374 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1613 2 12 4 1900 45 11 527 373 1551 CLUBHOUSE DR COLLECTOR 1599 1 12 0 1575 35 10 528 374 375 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1398 2 12 4 1900 45 11 529 375 376 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1110 2 12 4 1900 45 11 530 376 377 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1467 2 12 4 1900 45 11 531 376 416 MARINA HILLS RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1350 2 12 4 1900 40 11 532 377 294 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1914 2 12 4 1900 45 11 533 381 310 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 653 2 12 4 1900 45 11 534 383 384 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 1272 2 12 4 1900 40 16 535 383 1321 STONEHILL DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1215 2 12 0 1900 45 16 536 383 1610 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 1039 2 12 0 1900 40 16 537 384 383 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 1272 2 12 4 1900 40 16 538 384 385 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 1370 2 12 4 1900 40 16 539 384 409 SELVA DR MINOR ARTERIAL 2326 1 12 0 1575 35 16 540 385 384 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 1370 2 12 4 1900 40 16 541 385 1315 LA CRESTA DR COLLECTOR 725 1 12 4 1350 30 16 542 385 1689 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 445 2 12 4 1900 35 16 543 390 1332 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 1014 2 12 0 1900 45 16 544 390 1690 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 1313 2 12 0 1900 45 16 545 393 396 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 2233 2 12 0 1900 40 16 546 393 1327 STONEHILL DR MINOR ARTERIAL 619 2 12 0 1900 45 16 547 393 1332 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 1288 2 12 0 1900 45 16 548 393 1720 STONEHILL DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 2356 2 12 0 1900 45 16 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K61 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 549 396 393 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 2240 2 12 0 1900 40 16 550 396 1324 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 870 2 12 0 1900 40 16 551 400 1596 NIGUEL RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1637 3 12 4 1900 45 15 552 402 400 NIGUEL RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1327 3 12 4 1900 45 15 553 402 1598 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 928 2 12 4 1900 45 15 554 404 383 STONEHILL DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1860 2 12 0 1900 45 16 555 404 412 SELVA RD COLLECTOR 782 1 12 4 1700 40 16 556 405 404 STONEHILL DR MINOR ARTERIAL 421 2 12 0 1900 45 16 557 406 407 STONEHILL DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1167 2 12 0 1900 45 16 558 407 408 STONEHILL DR MINOR ARTERIAL 804 2 12 0 1900 45 15 559 408 402 STONEHILL DR MINOR ARTERIAL 613 2 12 0 1900 45 15 STREET OF THE BLUE 560 409 1322 LANTERN COLLECTOR 1373 1 12 0 1350 30 16 561 409 1323 SELVA DR MINOR ARTERIAL 230 1 12 0 1575 35 16 STREET OF THE BLUE 562 409 1631 LANTERN COLLECTOR 680 1 12 0 1350 30 16 563 410 269 SELVA RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1833 2 12 4 1900 40 15 564 411 384 SELVA RD COLLECTOR 1543 1 12 4 1900 40 16 565 411 412 SELVA RD COLLECTOR 493 1 12 4 1700 40 16 566 412 404 SELVA RD COLLECTOR 782 1 12 4 1900 40 16 567 412 411 SELVA RD COLLECTOR 493 1 12 4 1700 40 16 568 414 416 MARINA HILLS RD MINOR ARTERIAL 3079 2 12 4 1900 40 11 569 414 1570 MARINA HILLS RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1303 2 12 4 1900 40 11 570 416 376 MARINA HILLS RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1350 2 12 4 1900 40 11 571 416 414 MARINA HILLS RD MINOR ARTERIAL 3109 2 12 4 1900 40 11 572 418 1570 MARINA HILLS RD MINOR ARTERIAL 820 2 12 4 1900 40 11 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K62 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 573 418 1573 GOLDEN LANTERN MAJOR ARTERIAL 1662 3 12 4 1900 50 7 574 419 422 PACIFIC ISLAND DR MINOR ARTERIAL 2688 2 12 4 1900 45 10 575 422 424 PACIFIC ISLAND DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1358 2 12 4 1900 45 10 576 424 426 PACIFIC ISLAND DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1117 2 12 4 1900 45 10 577 426 427 PACIFIC ISLAND DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1721 2 12 4 1900 45 10 578 427 429 PACIFIC ISLAND DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1507 2 12 4 1900 45 10 579 429 430 PACIFIC ISLAND DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1243 2 12 4 1900 45 10 580 430 431 PACIFIC ISLAND DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1086 2 12 4 1900 45 10 581 431 435 PACIFIC ISLAND DR MINOR ARTERIAL 2215 2 12 4 1900 45 10 582 432 434 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1055 2 12 4 1900 50 10 583 432 437 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1342 3 12 4 1900 50 6 584 432 1553 IVY GLENN DR COLLECTOR 1176 1 12 0 1900 35 6 585 434 294 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1449 3 12 4 1900 45 10 586 434 432 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1055 3 12 4 1900 50 10 587 435 432 PACIFIC ISLAND DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1125 2 12 4 1900 45 6 588 437 439 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1836 3 12 4 1900 50 6 589 439 441 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 567 3 12 4 1900 50 6 590 441 443 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2356 3 12 4 1900 50 6 591 443 995 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2006 3 12 4 1900 50 6 592 449 1006 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1331 3 12 4 1900 50 7 593 450 298 LA PAZ RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1622 2 12 4 1900 45 7 594 450 452 LA PAZ RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1267 2 12 4 1900 45 7 595 452 454 LA PAZ RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1781 2 12 4 1900 45 7 596 454 1003 LA PAZ RD MINOR ARTERIAL 791 2 12 4 1900 45 7 597 454 1465 RANCHO NIGUEL RD COLLECTOR 2214 1 12 0 1900 35 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K63 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 598 456 361 PASEO DE LA COLINAS MINOR ARTERIAL 725 1 12 4 1900 45 7 599 456 457 PASEO DE LA COLINAS MINOR ARTERIAL 651 2 12 4 1900 45 7 600 457 456 PASEO DE LA COLINAS MINOR ARTERIAL 651 2 12 4 1900 45 7 601 457 458 PASEO DE LA COLINAS MINOR ARTERIAL 1650 2 12 4 1900 45 7 602 458 459 PASEO DE LA COLINAS MINOR ARTERIAL 1088 2 12 4 1900 45 7 603 459 460 PASEO DE LA COLINAS MINOR ARTERIAL 653 2 12 4 1900 45 7 604 460 461 PASEO DE LA COLINAS MINOR ARTERIAL 619 2 12 4 1900 45 7 605 460 467 CABOT RD MINOR ARTERIAL 759 2 12 4 1900 50 7 606 461 462 PASEO DE LA COLINAS MINOR ARTERIAL 582 2 12 4 1900 45 7 607 462 463 PASEO DE LA COLINAS MINOR ARTERIAL 441 2 12 4 1900 45 7 608 463 464 PASEO DE LA COLINAS MINOR ARTERIAL 305 2 12 4 1900 35 7 609 464 465 PASEO DE LA COLINAS MINOR ARTERIAL 282 2 12 4 1900 35 7 610 465 466 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 752 2 12 0 1900 40 7 611 466 148 AVERY PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 173 2 12 0 1900 40 7 612 467 460 CABOT RD MINOR ARTERIAL 759 2 12 4 1900 50 7 613 467 468 CABOT RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1543 2 12 4 1900 50 7 614 468 308 CABOT RD MINOR ARTERIAL 750 2 12 4 1900 50 7 615 469 470 CABOT RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1090 2 12 4 1900 50 2 616 470 471 CABOT RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1618 2 12 4 1900 50 2 617 471 1023 CABOT RD MINOR ARTERIAL 2344 2 12 4 1900 50 2 618 472 473 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 2778 2 12 0 1900 45 12 619 473 474 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 1370 2 12 0 1900 45 11 620 474 144 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 605 2 12 0 1900 40 11 621 475 151 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 700 4 12 0 1900 50 2 622 475 476 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 735 4 12 0 1900 50 3 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K64 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 623 476 475 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 735 4 12 0 1900 50 3 624 476 477 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1141 4 12 0 1900 50 3 625 477 476 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1141 4 12 0 1900 50 3 626 477 478 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 608 4 12 0 1900 50 3 627 478 477 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 608 4 12 0 1900 50 3 628 478 479 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1290 5 12 4 1900 50 3 629 479 478 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1290 4 12 4 1900 50 3 630 479 515 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 758 2 12 0 1900 45 3 631 479 1429 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 974 4 12 4 1900 50 3 632 480 481 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 850 4 12 4 1900 55 3 633 480 1429 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1145 4 12 4 1900 50 3 634 481 480 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 850 3 12 4 1900 55 3 635 481 1670 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1028 4 12 4 1900 55 3 636 482 483 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1282 3 12 4 1900 55 3 637 482 1670 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 555 4 12 4 1900 60 3 638 483 482 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1282 3 12 4 1900 55 3 639 483 484 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1124 3 12 4 1900 55 3 640 484 483 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1124 3 12 4 1900 55 3 641 484 485 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 781 3 12 4 1900 55 3 642 485 484 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 781 3 12 4 1900 55 3 643 485 486 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 702 3 12 4 1900 55 3 644 486 195 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 983 2 12 4 1900 60 3 645 486 485 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 702 3 12 4 1900 55 3 646 487 139 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1102 1 12 0 1900 45 12 647 487 488 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1192 2 12 0 1900 45 12 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K65 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 648 488 487 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1187 2 12 0 1900 45 12 649 488 489 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1120 2 12 0 1900 45 12 650 489 490 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1240 2 12 0 1900 45 12 651 490 491 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 977 2 12 0 1900 45 12 652 491 492 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 496 1 12 0 1700 45 12 653 492 493 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 300 1 12 0 1700 45 12 654 493 141 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 585 2 12 0 1900 45 12 655 494 141 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1440 1 12 0 1900 50 12 656 494 495 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 838 2 12 0 1900 50 12 657 495 494 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 838 2 12 0 1900 50 12 658 495 496 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 463 2 12 0 1900 50 8 659 496 497 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1105 2 12 0 1900 50 7 660 497 498 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 661 2 12 0 1900 50 7 661 498 499 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 676 2 12 0 1900 50 7 662 499 500 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1043 2 12 0 1900 50 7 663 500 501 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1216 2 12 0 1900 50 7 664 501 502 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1443 2 12 0 1900 50 7 665 502 503 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 542 2 12 0 1900 45 7 666 503 504 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 436 2 12 0 1900 45 7 667 504 505 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 434 2 12 0 1900 45 7 668 505 147 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 553 2 12 0 1900 45 7 669 506 507 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 808 2 12 0 1900 45 7 670 507 508 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 920 2 12 0 1900 45 7 671 508 509 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 496 2 12 0 1900 45 7 672 509 510 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 663 2 12 0 1900 45 8 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K66 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 673 510 511 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 1462 2 12 0 1900 45 8 674 511 512 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 703 2 12 0 1900 45 8 675 511 1419 MEDICAL CENTER DR COLLECTOR 250 2 12 0 1900 35 8 676 512 513 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 833 2 12 0 1900 45 8 677 513 514 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 754 2 12 0 1900 45 8 678 514 479 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 833 3 12 0 1900 45 3 679 515 516 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 698 2 12 0 1900 45 3 680 516 517 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 927 2 12 0 1900 45 3 681 517 1038 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 1265 2 12 0 1900 45 3 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 682 519 520 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 1113 3 12 8 2250 75 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 683 520 521 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 1267 3 12 8 2250 75 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 684 520 527 CORRIDOR FREEWAY RAMP 1534 3 12 10 2250 75 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 685 521 520 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 1268 3 12 10 2250 75 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 686 521 522 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 1065 3 12 10 2250 75 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 687 522 521 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 1065 3 12 10 2250 75 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K67 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 688 522 523 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 936 3 12 10 2250 75 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 689 523 522 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 937 3 12 10 2250 75 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 690 523 524 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 1036 3 12 8 2250 70 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 691 524 523 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 1036 3 12 10 2250 75 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 692 524 525 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 784 3 12 8 2250 70 7 SJHTC GREENFIELD DR 693 525 306 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 1251 1 12 4 1900 45 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 694 525 524 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 784 3 12 10 2250 70 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 695 525 526 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 2958 3 12 4 2250 70 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 696 526 525 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 2953 3 12 10 2250 70 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 697 526 1018 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 2109 3 12 8 2250 70 2 SJHTC GREENFIELD DR 698 526 1478 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 1779 1 12 4 1900 45 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K68 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 699 527 80 I5 FREEWAY 2741 7 12 4 2250 70 7 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 700 527 519 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 482 3 12 8 2250 70 7 701 527 1417 I5 FREEWAY 1364 5 12 4 2250 70 7 702 528 529 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 637 2 12 0 1900 35 20 703 528 1713 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 419 2 12 0 1900 40 20 704 529 528 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 637 2 12 0 1900 35 20 705 529 771 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 610 2 12 0 1900 35 20 706 530 531 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 1369 2 12 0 1900 35 20 707 530 771 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 342 2 12 0 1900 35 20 708 531 530 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 1369 2 12 0 1900 35 20 709 531 532 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 256 1 12 0 1900 40 20 710 532 531 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 256 2 12 0 1900 40 20 711 532 755 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 238 2 12 0 1900 35 20 712 533 534 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 790 2 12 0 1900 35 20 713 533 764 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 1099 2 12 0 1900 35 20 714 533 1185 AVENIDA PALIZADA MINOR ARTERIAL 217 2 12 0 1900 35 20 715 534 533 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 790 2 12 0 1900 35 20 716 534 535 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 484 2 12 0 1900 30 20 717 535 534 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 484 2 12 0 1900 30 20 718 535 536 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 448 2 12 0 1900 30 20 719 536 535 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 448 2 12 0 1900 30 20 720 536 537 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 430 2 12 0 1900 35 20 721 537 536 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 430 2 12 0 1900 35 20 722 537 538 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 468 2 12 0 1900 35 20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K69 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 723 538 537 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 468 2 12 0 1900 35 20 724 538 539 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 1334 2 12 4 1900 35 19 725 539 538 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 1335 2 12 4 1900 35 19 726 539 540 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 463 2 12 4 1900 35 19 727 539 1195 CALLE DE LOS MOLINOS LOCAL ROADWAY 508 1 12 0 1350 30 19 728 540 539 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 463 2 12 4 1900 35 19 729 540 1718 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 489 2 12 4 1900 35 19 730 541 614 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 806 2 12 4 1900 45 19 731 541 1717 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 203 2 12 4 1900 35 19 732 541 1718 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 196 2 12 4 1900 35 19 733 542 1660 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 310 2 12 0 1900 35 19 734 542 1717 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 233 2 12 4 1900 55 19 735 543 1258 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1581 1 12 4 1700 50 19 736 543 1719 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 442 2 12 4 1900 50 19 737 544 545 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 3562 1 12 4 1700 50 19 738 544 598 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 617 2 12 0 1900 35 19 739 544 1719 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 398 1 12 4 1900 50 19 740 545 546 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2214 1 12 4 1700 50 17 741 546 547 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1469 1 12 4 1700 50 17 742 547 548 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1438 1 12 4 1900 50 17 743 548 1281 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 397 2 12 4 1900 50 16 744 549 591 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 369 2 12 4 1900 55 16 745 550 253 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 719 2 12 4 1900 55 16 746 550 254 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 396 2 12 4 1900 55 16 747 551 109 S EL CAMINO REAL MINOR ARTERIAL 527 1 12 0 1900 35 24 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K70 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 748 551 552 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 1231 2 12 4 1900 40 24 749 552 553 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 2067 2 12 4 1900 40 24 750 553 554 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 1020 2 12 4 1900 40 24 751 553 1164 FRWY OVERPASS COLLECTOR 362 1 12 0 1575 35 24 752 554 555 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 725 2 12 4 1900 40 24 753 555 556 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 697 2 12 4 1900 40 24 754 556 111 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 542 1 12 4 1900 40 24 SAN DEIGO FRWY 755 556 812 OVERPASS COLLECTOR 361 1 12 4 1900 40 24 756 557 111 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 507 1 12 0 1900 40 24 757 557 558 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 701 2 12 4 1900 40 24 758 558 559 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 615 2 12 4 1900 40 20 759 559 813 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 382 2 12 0 1900 40 20 760 560 550 SR 1 DOHENY RD RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 689 1 12 4 1350 30 16 761 560 561 DOHENY PARK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 679 2 12 4 1900 35 16 762 560 1282 DOHENY PARK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 179 2 12 4 1900 45 16 763 561 560 DOHENY PARK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 679 2 12 4 1900 35 16 764 561 1663 DOHENY PARK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1216 2 12 4 1900 35 16 765 563 567 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 1027 1 12 0 1700 45 16 766 563 1342 I 5 STONEHILL DR RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 1553 2 12 4 1900 45 16 767 563 1665 DOHENY PARK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 766 2 12 4 1900 40 16 768 563 1720 STONEHILL DR MINOR ARTERIAL 497 2 12 0 1900 45 16 769 567 563 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 1021 1 12 0 1900 45 16 770 567 1343 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 2242 2 12 0 1900 45 16 771 569 1667 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 1591 1 12 0 1700 45 12 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K71 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 772 571 572 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 423 2 12 0 1900 40 12 773 572 573 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 478 2 12 0 1900 35 12 774 572 1721 SAN JUAN CREEK RD COLLECTOR 479 2 12 4 1900 45 12 775 573 572 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 478 2 12 0 1900 35 12 776 573 1347 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 1243 2 12 0 1900 35 12 777 574 561 VICTORIA BLVD COLLECTOR 1493 1 12 0 1900 35 16 778 575 574 VICTORIA BLVD COLLECTOR 315 1 12 0 1575 35 16 779 576 575 VIA CANON COLLECTOR 589 1 12 0 1350 30 16 780 577 576 VIA CANON COLLECTOR 311 1 12 0 1350 30 16 781 578 577 CAMINO CAPISTRANO LOCAL ROADWAY 318 1 12 4 1350 30 16 782 579 580 CAMINO CAPISTRANO LOCAL ROADWAY 860 1 12 4 1350 30 16 783 579 1233 CAMINO CAPISTRANO LOCAL ROADWAY 723 1 12 4 1350 30 16 784 580 579 CAMINO CAPISTRANO LOCAL ROADWAY 860 1 12 4 1350 30 16 785 580 581 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 396 1 12 0 1575 35 16 786 581 580 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 396 1 12 0 1575 35 16 787 581 1234 PALISADES DR COLLECTOR 532 1 12 0 1575 35 16 788 582 581 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 571 1 12 0 1575 35 17 789 583 582 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 687 1 12 0 1575 35 17 790 584 583 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 391 1 12 0 1575 35 17 791 585 584 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 350 1 12 0 1575 35 17 792 586 585 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 391 1 12 0 1575 35 17 793 587 586 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 288 1 12 0 1575 35 17 794 588 587 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 478 1 12 0 1575 35 17 795 588 1706 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 255 2 12 0 1900 45 17 796 589 1235 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 589 2 12 0 1900 45 17 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K72 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 797 589 1706 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 1190 2 12 0 1900 45 17 798 590 127 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 484 2 12 0 1900 35 17 799 590 1235 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 388 2 12 0 1900 35 17 800 591 253 SR 1 DOHENY RD RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 718 1 12 4 1700 45 16 801 591 550 SR 1 DOHENY RD RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 709 1 12 4 1350 30 16 802 591 1282 DOHENY PARK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 365 2 12 4 1900 45 16 803 592 588 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 1245 1 12 0 1575 35 17 804 593 592 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 1501 1 12 0 1575 35 17 805 594 593 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 1692 1 12 0 1900 35 19 806 595 594 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 604 1 12 0 1575 35 19 807 596 595 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 661 1 12 0 1575 35 19 808 597 596 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 431 2 12 0 1900 35 19 809 598 544 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 616 1 12 0 1900 35 19 810 598 597 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 719 2 12 0 1900 35 19 811 598 599 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 321 1 12 0 1900 40 19 812 599 598 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 321 1 12 0 1900 40 19 813 599 600 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 490 1 12 0 1700 40 19 814 600 599 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 491 1 12 0 1900 40 19 815 600 601 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 664 1 12 0 1700 40 19 816 601 600 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 663 1 12 0 1700 40 19 817 601 602 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 762 1 12 0 1700 40 19 818 602 601 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 763 1 12 0 1700 40 19 819 602 603 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 679 1 12 0 1700 40 19 820 603 602 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 678 1 12 0 1700 40 19 821 603 604 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 613 1 12 0 1700 40 17 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K73 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 822 604 603 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 613 1 12 0 1700 40 17 823 604 605 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 1423 1 12 0 1700 40 17 824 605 604 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 1423 1 12 0 1700 40 17 825 605 606 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 788 1 12 0 1700 40 17 826 606 605 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 795 1 12 0 1700 40 17 827 606 607 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 957 1 12 0 1900 40 17 828 607 606 AVENIDA VAQUARO COLLECTOR 962 1 12 0 1700 40 17 829 607 608 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MAJOR ARTERIAL 470 3 12 0 1900 45 17 830 608 609 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MAJOR ARTERIAL 496 3 12 0 1900 45 17 831 609 610 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MAJOR ARTERIAL 635 3 12 0 1900 40 17 832 610 611 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MAJOR ARTERIAL 764 3 12 0 1900 40 17 833 611 612 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MAJOR ARTERIAL 516 3 12 0 1900 40 17 834 612 613 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MAJOR ARTERIAL 747 3 12 0 1900 40 17 835 613 126 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MAJOR ARTERIAL 321 3 12 0 1900 35 17 836 614 541 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 808 3 12 4 1900 45 19 837 614 615 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 846 2 12 4 1900 45 19 838 615 614 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 846 2 12 4 1900 45 19 839 615 616 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 1002 2 12 4 1900 40 19 840 616 615 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 1002 2 12 4 1900 40 19 841 616 1196 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 454 2 12 4 1900 50 19 842 617 1196 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 480 2 12 4 1900 50 20 843 617 1715 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 178 2 12 0 1900 50 20 844 618 121 AVENIDA PICO COLLECTOR 460 2 12 4 1900 50 20 845 619 620 CALLE FRONTERA COLLECTOR 219 2 12 0 1900 40 20 846 619 1201 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 408 4 12 4 1900 50 20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K74 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 847 620 621 CALLE FRONTERA COLLECTOR 548 2 12 0 1900 40 20 848 621 622 CALLE FRONTERA COLLECTOR 694 2 12 0 1900 40 20 849 622 623 CALLE FRONTERA COLLECTOR 732 1 12 0 1700 40 20 850 623 624 CALLE FRONTERA COLLECTOR 581 1 12 0 1700 40 20 851 624 625 CALLE FRONTERA COLLECTOR 979 1 12 0 1700 40 19 852 625 626 CALLE FRONTERA COLLECTOR 1129 1 12 0 1900 40 19 853 626 123 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MAJOR ARTERIAL 504 2 12 0 1900 50 19 854 626 627 CALLE FRONTERA LOCAL ROADWAY 762 1 12 0 1575 35 19 855 627 628 CALLE FRONTERA LOCAL ROADWAY 676 1 12 0 1575 35 19 856 628 629 CALLE FRONTERA LOCAL ROADWAY 720 1 12 0 1575 35 19 857 629 630 CALLE FRONTERA LOCAL ROADWAY 743 1 12 0 1575 35 19 858 630 631 CALLE FRONTERA LOCAL ROADWAY 515 1 12 0 1575 35 17 859 631 632 CALLE FRONTERA LOCAL ROADWAY 205 1 12 0 1575 35 17 860 632 633 CALLE JUAREZ LOCAL ROADWAY 200 1 12 0 1350 30 17 861 633 634 CALLE JUAREZ LOCAL ROADWAY 708 1 12 0 1350 30 17 862 634 635 CALLE JUAREZ COLLECTOR 289 1 12 0 1350 30 17 863 635 636 CALLE JUAREZ LOCAL ROADWAY 323 1 12 0 1350 30 17 864 636 605 CALLE GUADALAJARA LOCAL ROADWAY 484 1 12 0 1350 30 17 865 637 638 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 781 3 12 4 1900 50 21 866 638 639 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 837 3 12 4 1900 50 21 867 639 640 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 2076 3 12 4 1900 50 18 868 640 641 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 1475 3 12 4 1900 50 18 869 641 642 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 2069 3 12 4 1900 50 18 870 642 643 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 770 3 12 4 1900 50 18 871 643 1212 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 1061 3 12 4 1900 50 18 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K75 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 872 644 645 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 1146 3 12 4 1900 50 18 873 645 646 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 623 3 12 4 1900 50 18 874 645 701 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 453 2 12 0 1900 45 18 875 646 647 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 1229 3 12 4 1900 50 20 876 647 648 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 1111 3 12 4 1900 50 20 877 648 817 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 625 3 12 4 1700 50 20 878 649 626 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 1262 3 12 4 1900 45 19 879 650 649 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 888 2 12 4 1900 45 17 880 651 650 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 1045 2 12 4 1900 45 18 881 652 651 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 780 2 12 4 1900 45 18 882 653 652 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 1069 2 12 4 1900 40 18 883 653 1700 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 277 2 12 0 1900 40 18 884 654 653 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 1776 2 12 4 1900 45 18 885 655 654 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 2031 2 12 4 1900 45 18 886 656 655 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 675 2 12 4 1900 45 18 887 657 656 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 473 2 12 4 1900 45 18 888 657 992 AVENIDA LA PATA MAJOR ARTERIAL 502 3 12 4 1900 45 18 889 658 643 AVENIDA LA PATA MAJOR ARTERIAL 971 2 12 4 1900 45 18 890 659 986 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 605 2 12 4 1900 45 18 891 660 659 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 596 2 12 4 1900 45 18 892 661 660 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 769 2 12 4 1900 45 18 893 661 662 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 987 2 12 4 1900 45 18 894 662 663 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 967 2 12 4 1900 45 18 895 663 641 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 835 2 12 4 1900 45 18 896 664 665 CALLE DEL CERRO COLLECTOR 841 2 12 0 1900 35 20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K76 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 897 665 666 CALLE DEL CERRO COLLECTOR 755 2 12 0 1900 35 20 898 666 648 CALLE DEL CERRO COLLECTOR 735 2 12 0 1900 35 20 899 667 994 AVENIDA LA PATA MINOR ARTERIAL 801 2 12 4 1900 45 18 900 668 667 AVENIDA LA PATA MINOR ARTERIAL 675 2 12 4 1900 45 18 901 669 668 AVENIDA LA PATA MINOR ARTERIAL 664 2 12 4 1900 45 18 902 670 669 AVENIDA LA PATA MINOR ARTERIAL 668 2 12 4 1900 45 18 903 671 670 AVENIDA LA PATA MINOR ARTERIAL 432 2 12 4 1900 45 18 904 671 672 CALLE DEL CERRO COLLECTOR 870 1 12 0 1575 35 20 905 672 671 CALLE DEL CERRO COLLECTOR 869 1 12 0 1575 35 20 906 672 673 CALLE DEL CERRO COLLECTOR 1202 1 12 0 1575 35 20 907 673 672 CALLE DEL CERRO COLLECTOR 1203 1 12 0 1575 35 20 908 673 674 CALLE DEL CERRO COLLECTOR 1869 1 12 0 1575 35 20 909 674 1209 CALLE DEL CERRO COLLECTOR 1471 1 12 0 1575 35 20 910 675 663 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 583 1 12 0 1900 35 18 911 676 675 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 448 1 12 0 1575 35 18 912 677 676 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 622 1 12 0 1575 35 18 913 678 677 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 630 1 12 0 1575 35 18 914 679 678 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 780 1 12 0 1575 35 18 915 680 679 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 635 1 12 0 1575 35 18 916 680 681 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 902 1 12 0 1575 35 21 917 681 682 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 576 1 12 0 1575 35 21 918 682 683 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 641 1 12 0 1575 35 21 919 683 684 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 624 1 12 0 1575 35 21 920 684 685 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 585 1 12 0 1575 35 21 921 685 686 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 425 1 12 0 1575 35 21 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K77 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 922 686 687 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 355 1 12 0 1575 35 21 923 687 637 CAMINO LA PEDRIZA COLLECTOR 613 1 12 0 1575 35 21 924 688 982 AVENIDA TALEGA MINOR ARTERIAL 604 2 12 6 1900 45 18 925 689 688 AVENIDA TALEGA MINOR ARTERIAL 855 2 12 6 1900 45 18 926 690 689 AVENIDA TALEGA MINOR ARTERIAL 1205 2 12 6 1900 45 18 927 690 696 CALLE SALUDA COLLECTOR 845 1 12 0 1575 35 18 928 691 690 AVENIDA TALEGA MINOR ARTERIAL 600 2 12 6 1900 45 18 929 692 691 AVENIDA TALEGA MINOR ARTERIAL 2149 2 12 6 1900 45 18 930 693 692 AVENIDA TALEGA MINOR ARTERIAL 1364 2 12 6 1900 45 18 931 694 693 AVENIDA TALEGA MINOR ARTERIAL 963 2 12 6 1900 45 18 932 695 696 CALLE SALUDA COLLECTOR 957 1 12 0 1575 35 18 933 695 699 CALLE SALUDA COLLECTOR 516 1 12 0 1575 35 18 934 696 690 CALLE SALUDA COLLECTOR 849 1 12 0 1900 35 18 935 696 695 CALLE SALUDA COLLECTOR 962 1 12 0 1900 35 18 936 697 695 AVENIDA FRESCAS COLLECTOR 629 1 12 4 1900 35 18 937 698 697 AVENIDA FRESCAS COLLECTOR 515 1 12 4 1575 35 18 938 699 700 CALLE SALUDA COLLECTOR 1521 1 12 0 1900 35 18 939 700 987 AVENIDA LA PATA MINOR ARTERIAL 1720 2 12 4 1900 40 18 940 701 645 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 453 2 12 0 1900 45 18 941 701 1221 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 756 2 12 0 1900 45 18 942 702 1224 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 799 2 12 0 1900 45 18 943 703 704 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 879 2 12 0 1900 40 18 944 703 1700 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 518 2 12 0 1900 40 18 945 704 703 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 879 2 12 0 1900 40 18 946 704 705 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 602 2 12 0 1900 40 18 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K78 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 947 705 704 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 606 2 12 0 1900 40 18 948 705 706 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 935 2 12 0 1900 40 18 949 706 705 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 940 2 12 0 1900 40 18 950 706 707 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 1109 2 12 0 1900 40 18 951 707 706 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 1109 2 12 0 1900 40 18 952 707 708 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 844 2 12 0 1900 40 17 953 708 707 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 844 2 12 0 1900 40 17 954 708 709 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 844 2 12 0 1900 40 17 955 709 710 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 1368 2 12 0 1900 40 17 956 710 711 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MINOR ARTERIAL 983 2 12 0 1900 45 17 957 711 712 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MINOR ARTERIAL 1550 2 12 0 1900 45 17 958 712 713 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MINOR ARTERIAL 1474 2 12 0 1900 45 17 959 713 607 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MINOR ARTERIAL 1491 2 12 0 1900 45 17 960 714 710 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MINOR ARTERIAL 1378 2 12 0 1900 45 17 961 715 714 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MINOR ARTERIAL 857 2 12 0 1900 45 17 962 716 715 CAMINO DEL RIO COLLECTOR 578 1 12 4 1700 40 17 963 717 716 CAMINO DEL RIO COLLECTOR 867 2 12 4 1900 40 17 964 718 717 CAMINO DEL RIO COLLECTOR 837 2 12 4 1900 40 18 965 718 719 CALLE SARMENTOSO COLLECTOR 449 1 12 4 1575 35 18 966 719 720 CALLE SARMENTOSO COLLECTOR 810 1 12 4 1575 35 18 967 720 721 CALLE SARMENTOSO COLLECTOR 1106 1 12 4 1575 35 18 968 721 722 CALLE SARMENTOSO COLLECTOR 652 1 12 4 1575 35 18 969 722 723 CALLE SARMENTOSO COLLECTOR 739 1 12 4 1575 35 17 970 723 708 CALLE SARMENTOSO COLLECTOR 691 1 12 4 1900 35 17 971 724 816 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 877 1 12 0 1350 30 20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K79 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 972 725 724 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 390 1 12 0 900 20 20 973 726 725 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 377 1 12 0 1350 30 20 974 727 726 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 423 1 12 0 1350 30 20 975 728 727 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 656 1 12 0 1350 30 20 976 729 728 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 678 1 12 0 1350 30 20 977 730 729 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 313 1 12 0 1350 30 20 978 731 730 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 307 1 12 0 1350 30 20 979 732 731 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 493 1 12 0 900 20 20 980 733 732 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 1015 1 12 0 1350 30 20 981 733 734 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 821 1 12 0 1350 30 20 982 734 736 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 578 1 12 0 1350 30 20 983 735 737 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 636 1 12 0 1350 30 20 984 736 735 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 458 1 12 0 1350 30 20 985 737 738 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 536 1 12 0 1350 30 20 986 738 739 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 412 1 12 0 1350 30 20 987 739 740 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 630 1 12 0 1350 30 20 988 740 1175 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 164 1 12 0 1575 35 20 989 740 1177 AVENIDA CABALLEROS COLLECTOR 275 1 12 0 1350 30 20 990 741 733 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 819 1 12 0 1350 30 20 991 742 741 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 706 1 12 0 1350 30 20 992 743 742 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 660 1 12 0 1350 30 20 993 744 743 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 504 1 12 0 1350 30 20 994 745 744 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 546 1 12 0 1350 30 20 995 746 745 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 1076 1 12 0 1350 30 20 996 747 746 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 949 1 12 0 1350 30 20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K80 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 997 748 747 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 1205 1 12 0 1350 30 20 998 748 749 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 892 1 12 0 1350 30 20 999 749 748 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 892 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1000 749 750 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 352 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1001 750 749 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 352 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1002 750 751 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 785 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1003 751 750 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 792 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1004 751 752 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 557 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1005 752 751 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 557 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1006 752 753 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 353 1 12 0 1350 30 24 1007 753 752 AVENIDA SALVADOR COLLECTOR 348 1 12 0 1350 30 24 1008 753 754 E AVENIDA SAN GABRIEL COLLECTOR 668 1 12 4 1575 35 24 1009 754 557 E AVENIDA SAN GABRIEL COLLECTOR 757 1 12 4 1900 35 24 1010 755 1714 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 112 2 12 0 1900 35 20 1011 756 757 AVENIDA DEL MAR MAJOR ARTERIAL 372 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1012 757 758 AVENIDA DEL MAR MAJOR ARTERIAL 210 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1013 758 759 AVENIDA DEL MAR MAJOR ARTERIAL 273 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1014 759 760 AVENIDA DEL MAR MAJOR ARTERIAL 330 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1015 760 761 AVENIDA DEL MAR MAJOR ARTERIAL 517 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1016 761 762 AVENIDA DEL MAR MAJOR ARTERIAL 444 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1017 762 763 AVENIDA DEL MAR MAJOR ARTERIAL 719 1 12 0 1900 30 20 1018 763 764 AVENIDA DEL MAR MAJOR ARTERIAL 959 1 12 0 1900 30 20 1019 764 533 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 1099 2 12 0 1900 35 20 1020 764 815 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 455 2 12 0 1900 35 20 1021 765 766 ESPLANADE COLLECTOR 450 1 12 0 1350 30 20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K81 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1022 766 767 ESPLANADE COLLECTOR 265 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1023 767 768 ESPLANADE COLLECTOR 348 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1024 768 769 ESPLANADE COLLECTOR 780 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1025 769 770 ESPLANADE COLLECTOR 973 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1026 770 771 ESPLANADE COLLECTOR 408 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1027 771 529 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 610 2 12 0 1900 35 20 1028 771 530 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 342 2 12 0 1900 35 20 1029 772 769 S OLA VISTA COLLECTOR 451 1 12 4 1575 35 20 1030 773 772 S OLA VISTA COLLECTOR 652 1 12 4 1575 35 20 1031 774 773 S OLA VISTA COLLECTOR 561 1 12 4 1575 35 20 1032 774 1167 W AVENIDA VALENCIA COLLECTOR 798 1 12 4 1575 35 20 1033 775 774 S OLA VISTA COLLECTOR 858 1 12 4 1575 35 24 1034 776 775 S OLA VISTA COLLECTOR 838 1 12 4 1575 35 24 1035 777 776 S OLA VISTA COLLECTOR 454 1 12 4 1575 35 24 1036 778 777 S OLA VISTA COLLECTOR 713 1 12 4 1575 35 24 1037 778 779 S OLA VISTA COLLECTOR 520 1 12 4 1575 35 24 1038 779 117 S OLA VISTA COLLECTOR 723 1 12 4 1350 30 24 1039 780 806 CRISTIANITOS RD COLLECTOR 815 1 12 4 1700 50 24 1040 781 780 CRISTIANITOS RD COLLECTOR 1932 1 12 4 1700 50 24 1041 782 781 CRISTIANITOS RD COLLECTOR 1111 1 12 4 1700 50 24 1042 783 782 CRISTIANITOS RD COLLECTOR 1801 1 12 4 1700 50 24 1043 784 783 CRISTIANITOS RD COLLECTOR 3657 1 12 4 1700 50 24 1044 785 784 CRISTIANITOS RD COLLECTOR 2202 1 12 4 1700 50 21 1045 786 785 CRISTIANITOS RD COLLECTOR 1538 1 12 4 1700 50 21 1046 787 786 SAN MATEO DR COLLECTOR 731 1 12 0 675 15 21 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K82 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1047 788 787 SAN MATEO DR COLLECTOR 1535 1 12 4 1575 35 21 1048 789 788 SAN MATEO DR COLLECTOR 3159 1 12 4 1350 30 21 1049 790 789 SAN MATEO DR COLLECTOR 3094 1 12 4 1575 35 21 1050 790 791 SAN MATEO DR COLLECTOR 3531 2 12 4 1900 50 21 1051 791 792 SAN MATEO DR COLLECTOR 2623 1 12 4 1700 50 25 1052 792 793 SAN MATEO DR COLLECTOR 2716 1 12 4 1700 50 25 1053 793 794 SAN MATEO DR COLLECTOR 2140 1 12 4 1700 50 25 1054 794 795 SAN MATEO DR COLLECTOR 896 1 12 4 1700 50 25 1055 795 796 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2089 1 12 8 1575 35 25 1056 795 888 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2772 1 12 8 1125 25 25 1057 796 797 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 5644 1 12 8 1700 50 25 1058 797 798 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2512 1 12 8 1700 50 25 1059 798 1676 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 3343 1 12 4 1900 35 25 1060 799 101 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 1577 2 12 4 1900 35 25 1061 800 801 CHAISON RD COLLECTOR 889 1 12 4 1575 35 25 1062 801 802 CHAISON RD COLLECTOR 813 1 12 4 1575 35 25 1063 802 803 CHAISON RD COLLECTOR 1261 1 12 4 1575 35 25 1064 803 804 CHAISON RD COLLECTOR 728 1 12 4 1575 35 25 1065 804 101 CHAISON RD COLLECTOR 728 1 12 4 1575 35 24 1066 805 99 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 231 2 12 4 1900 40 24 1067 806 109 CRISTIANITOS RD COLLECTOR 243 1 12 4 1900 50 24 1068 807 553 AVENIDA SAN LUIS REY COLLECTOR 554 1 12 0 1900 40 24 1069 808 809 E AVENIDA MAGDALENA COLLECTOR 501 1 12 0 1575 35 24 1070 809 810 E AVENIDA MAGDALENA COLLECTOR 641 1 12 0 1575 35 24 1071 810 811 E AVENIDA MAGDALENA COLLECTOR 402 1 12 0 1575 35 24 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K83 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1072 811 555 E AVENIDA MAGDALENA COLLECTOR 400 1 12 0 1575 35 24 SAN DEIGO FRWY 1073 812 556 OVERPASS COLLECTOR 362 1 12 4 1900 40 24 1074 812 1167 AVENIDA DEL PRESIDENTE COLLECTOR 3015 1 12 4 1700 45 24 1075 813 119 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 192 2 12 0 1900 40 20 I 5 EL CAMINO REAL 1076 814 53 RAMP FREEWAY RAMP 472 1 12 4 1700 45 20 1077 815 532 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 170 1 12 0 1900 35 20 1078 815 764 S EL CAMINO REAL MINOR ARTERIAL 455 2 12 0 1900 35 20 1079 816 619 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 247 1 12 0 1900 30 20 1080 817 619 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 462 4 12 4 1900 50 20 1081 818 179 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 478 2 12 8 1900 55 13 1082 819 188 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 554 1 12 4 1900 35 8 1083 820 819 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 831 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1084 821 820 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 630 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1085 822 821 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 673 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1086 824 874 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 870 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1087 825 826 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 550 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1088 826 875 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 150 1 12 0 675 15 8 1089 827 828 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 709 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1090 828 877 O'NEILL DR ROUNDABOUT LOCAL ROADWAY 96 1 12 0 675 15 8 1091 829 830 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 618 2 12 4 1900 40 8 1092 830 831 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 654 2 12 4 1900 50 8 1093 831 832 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 1251 2 12 4 1900 50 3 1094 832 482 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 702 2 12 4 1900 50 3 1095 833 887 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 568 1 12 4 1575 35 8 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K84 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1096 834 835 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 642 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1097 835 1421 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 366 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1098 836 842 DORRANCE COLLECTOR 481 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1099 837 881 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 190 1 12 0 675 15 8 SIENNA PKWY WINDMILL 1100 838 883 AVE ROUNDABOUT COLLECTOR 105 1 12 0 675 15 8 1101 839 840 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 1317 1 12 4 1575 35 3 1102 839 845 FLINTRIDGE AVE LOCAL ROADWAY 550 1 12 0 1575 35 3 1103 840 841 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 469 1 12 4 1575 35 3 1104 841 885 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 700 1 12 4 1575 35 3 1105 842 849 DORRANCE COLLECTOR 732 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1106 843 844 WINDMILL AVE COLLECTOR 544 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1107 844 886 WINDMILL AVE COLLECTOR 564 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1108 845 839 FLINTRIDGE AVE LOCAL ROADWAY 551 1 12 0 1575 35 3 1109 845 846 ROANOKE DR LOCAL ROADWAY 662 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1110 846 847 ROANOKE DR LOCAL ROADWAY 507 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1111 847 848 ROANOKE DR LOCAL ROADWAY 717 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1112 848 831 ROANOKE DR LOCAL ROADWAY 304 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1113 849 850 DORRANCE COLLECTOR 591 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1114 850 1423 DORRANCE COLLECTOR 448 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1115 851 873 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 600 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1116 852 851 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 672 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1117 853 852 COVENANT HILL DRIVE COLLECTOR 795 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1118 854 853 COVENANT HILL DRIVE COLLECTOR 813 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1119 855 854 COVENANT HILL DRIVE COLLECTOR 540 1 12 0 1575 35 8 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K85 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1120 856 855 COVENANT HILL DRIVE COLLECTOR 958 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1121 857 856 COVENANT HILL DRIVE COLLECTOR 608 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1122 857 858 COVENANT HILL DRIVE COLLECTOR 445 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1123 858 859 COVENANT HILL DRIVE COLLECTOR 659 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1124 859 860 COVENANT HILL DRIVE COLLECTOR 725 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1125 860 861 COVENANT HILL DRIVE COLLECTOR 618 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1126 861 862 COVENANT HILL DRIVE COLLECTOR 359 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1127 862 863 COVENANT HILL DRIVE COLLECTOR 435 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1128 863 864 COVENANT HILL DRIVE MAJOR ARTERIAL 576 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1129 864 187 COVENANT HILL DRIVE MAJOR ARTERIAL 757 1 12 0 1900 35 8 1130 865 852 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 395 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1131 866 865 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 916 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1132 867 868 AVENDALE BLVD COLLECTOR 544 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1133 868 869 AVENDALE BLVD COLLECTOR 983 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1134 869 190 AVENDALE BLVD COLLECTOR 837 1 12 4 1900 35 8 1135 870 824 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 748 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1136 871 833 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 481 1 12 4 1575 35 8 O'NEIL DR SIENNA PKWY 1137 871 870 ROUNDABOUT LOCAL ROADWAY 146 1 12 0 675 15 8 1138 872 822 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 1041 1 12 4 1575 35 8 O'NEIL DR SIENNA PKWY 1139 872 871 ROUNDABOUT LOCAL ROADWAY 150 1 12 0 675 15 8 O'NEIL DR SIENNA PKWY 1140 873 872 ROUNDABOUT LOCAL ROADWAY 148 1 12 0 675 15 8 1141 874 825 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 141 1 12 0 675 15 8 1142 875 827 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 1249 1 12 4 1575 35 8 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K86 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1143 876 1422 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 79 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1144 877 876 O'NEILL DR ROUNDABOUT LOCAL ROADWAY 115 1 12 0 675 15 8 SIENNA BLVD DORRANCE 1145 878 836 DAISY ST ROUNDABOUT LOCAL ROADWAY 163 1 12 0 675 15 8 1146 878 837 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 1011 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1147 879 867 DAISY ST COLLECTOR 400 1 12 4 1575 35 8 SIENNA BLVD DORRANCE 1148 879 878 DAISY ST ROUNDABOUT LOCAL ROADWAY 160 1 12 0 675 15 8 SIENNA BLVD DORRANCE 1149 880 879 DAISY ST ROUNDABOUT LOCAL ROADWAY 125 1 12 0 675 15 8 1150 881 838 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 1174 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1151 882 884 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 670 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1152 883 843 WINDMILL AVE COLLECTOR 438 1 12 0 1575 35 8 SIENNA PKWY WINDMILL 1153 883 882 AVE ROUNDABOUT LOCAL ROADWAY 100 1 12 0 675 15 8 1154 884 839 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 127 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1155 885 486 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 168 2 12 4 1900 35 3 1156 886 193 WINDMILL AVE COLLECTOR 213 1 12 0 1900 35 8 1157 887 834 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 180 1 12 4 675 15 8 1158 888 889 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 3638 1 12 4 1350 30 25 1159 889 890 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 5328 1 12 4 1700 45 25 1160 890 891 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2851 1 12 4 1700 45 26 1161 891 892 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2265 1 12 4 1125 25 26 1162 892 893 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 3666 1 12 4 1125 25 26 1163 893 894 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 4918 1 12 4 1700 45 26 1164 894 895 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 4573 2 12 4 1900 45 26 1165 895 896 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2039 2 12 4 1900 45 26 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K87 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1166 896 897 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2136 2 12 4 1900 35 26 1167 897 898 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2004 1 12 4 1700 45 26 1168 898 899 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2122 1 12 4 1575 35 26 1169 899 935 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 1399 1 12 4 1575 35 26 1170 900 901 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 5249 1 12 0 1575 35 26 1171 901 912 LAS PULGAS CANYON RD COLLECTOR 4480 1 12 8 1700 45 30 1172 901 937 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 1706 1 12 4 1575 35 27 1173 902 903 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2356 1 12 4 1700 50 31 1174 903 904 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2314 1 12 4 1700 50 31 1175 904 938 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 1364 1 12 4 1700 50 27 1176 905 906 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 3223 1 12 4 1700 50 27 1177 906 907 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2049 1 12 4 1700 50 31 1178 907 908 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2606 1 12 4 1700 50 31 1179 908 909 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 3430 1 12 0 1700 45 31 1180 909 910 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 3609 1 12 0 1700 50 31 1181 910 911 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 3501 1 12 4 1900 50 31 1182 911 1679 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 389 3 12 4 1900 45 31 1183 911 1680 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 547 3 12 4 1900 45 31 1184 912 913 LAS PULGAS CANYON RD COLLECTOR 4071 1 12 8 1700 50 30 1185 913 914 LAS PULGAS CANYON RD COLLECTOR 2469 1 12 8 1700 50 30 1186 914 915 LAS PULGAS CANYON RD COLLECTOR 2398 1 12 8 1700 50 30 1187 915 916 LAS PULGAS CANYON RD COLLECTOR 3781 1 12 8 1700 50 30 1188 916 917 LAS PULGAS CANYON RD COLLECTOR 5855 1 12 8 1700 50 30 1189 917 918 LAS PULGAS CANYON RD COLLECTOR 1104 1 12 8 1700 50 30 1190 918 919 LAS PULGAS RD COLLECTOR 732 2 12 4 1900 30 30 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K88 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1191 918 956 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 2332 1 12 4 1700 50 30 1192 919 1143 LAS PULGAS RD COLLECTOR 1276 1 12 4 1700 45 30 1193 920 98 LAS PULGAS RD COLLECTOR 950 1 12 4 1700 45 30 1194 921 939 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 3280 2 12 4 1900 45 31 1195 922 1118 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 2844 2 12 4 1900 50 31 1196 923 924 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 2787 2 12 4 1900 55 31 1197 924 925 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 3378 2 12 4 1900 55 34 1198 925 926 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 4517 2 12 4 1900 55 34 1199 926 927 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 3269 2 12 4 1900 55 34 1200 927 928 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 2881 2 12 4 1900 55 34 1201 928 929 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 3040 2 12 4 1900 55 34 1202 929 930 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1280 2 12 4 1900 55 34 1203 930 931 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1718 2 12 4 1900 45 36 1204 930 1087 ASH RD COLLECTOR 400 2 12 4 1900 40 36 1205 931 963 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 845 2 12 4 1900 45 36 1206 932 933 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 2734 2 12 4 1900 45 36 1207 933 965 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 850 3 12 4 1900 55 36 1208 935 936 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 953 1 12 4 1575 35 26 1209 936 900 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 778 1 12 4 1575 35 26 1210 937 902 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 3709 1 12 4 1700 50 31 1211 938 905 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2422 1 12 4 1700 50 27 1212 939 1685 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 233 3 12 4 1900 45 31 1213 940 921 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1379 2 12 4 1900 45 31 1214 941 940 A ST LOCAL ROADWAY 496 1 12 0 1900 30 31 1215 942 921 11TH ST LOCAL ROADWAY 316 1 12 0 1900 35 31 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K89 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1216 943 939 9TH ST LOCAL ROADWAY 646 1 12 0 1900 30 31 1217 944 922 6TH ST LOCAL ROADWAY 438 1 12 0 1900 35 31 1218 945 932 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 587 2 12 4 1900 45 36 1219 946 930 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 3024 1 12 8 1900 45 34 1220 947 946 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 4007 1 12 8 1700 50 34 1221 948 959 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 1617 2 12 4 1900 40 34 1222 949 958 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 1044 1 12 4 1700 40 33 1223 950 1134 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 752 1 12 4 1700 40 33 1224 951 1137 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 1345 1 12 4 1900 40 33 1225 952 951 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 5133 1 12 4 1700 50 33 1226 953 952 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 3077 1 12 4 1700 50 30 1227 954 955 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 2784 1 12 4 1700 50 30 1228 954 1141 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 1091 1 12 4 1700 45 30 1229 955 954 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 2784 1 12 4 1700 50 30 1230 955 956 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 1302 1 12 4 1700 50 30 1231 956 918 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 2332 1 12 4 1700 50 30 1232 956 955 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 1307 1 12 4 1700 50 30 1233 957 953 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 1755 1 12 4 1700 50 30 1234 958 960 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 1517 2 12 4 1900 40 33 1235 959 947 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 823 2 12 4 1900 40 34 1236 960 948 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 727 2 12 4 1900 40 33 1237 961 960 YAMANAKO WAY COLLECTOR 684 1 12 0 1900 35 33 1238 962 959 MITCHEL ST COLLECTOR 798 1 12 0 1900 35 34 1239 963 945 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 764 2 12 4 1900 45 36 1240 964 963 PLAZA DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 410 1 12 4 1900 30 36 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K90 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1241 965 89 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 427 2 12 4 1900 55 36 1242 967 972 WIRE MOUNTAIN RD MINOR ARTERIAL 844 2 12 4 1900 35 36 1243 968 967 WIRE MOUNTAIN RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1227 2 12 4 1900 35 36 1244 969 968 WIRE MOUNTAIN RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1105 2 12 4 1900 35 36 1245 970 969 WIRE MOUNTAIN RD MINOR ARTERIAL 570 1 12 4 1575 35 36 1246 971 970 WIRE MOUNTAIN RD MINOR ARTERIAL 2201 1 12 4 1700 40 36 1247 972 933 WIRE MOUNTAIN RD MINOR ARTERIAL 225 2 12 4 1900 35 36 CAMINO VIENTO FUERTE 1248 973 974 W COLLECTOR 894 1 12 4 1575 35 18 CAMINO VIENTO FUERTE 1249 973 975 W COLLECTOR 1256 1 12 4 1575 35 18 CAMINO VIENTO FUERTE 1250 974 692 W COLLECTOR 1269 1 12 4 1900 35 18 CAMINO VIENTO FUERTE 1251 975 976 W COLLECTOR 602 1 12 4 1575 35 18 CAMINO VIENTO FUERTE 1252 976 977 W COLLECTOR 1229 1 12 4 1575 35 18 CAMINO VIENTO FUERTE 1253 977 691 W COLLECTOR 680 1 12 4 1900 35 18 1254 978 973 CAMINO TIERRA GRANDE COLLECTOR 1287 1 12 0 1575 35 18 1255 979 978 CAMINO TIERRA GRANDE COLLECTOR 1297 1 12 0 1575 35 18 1256 979 980 CAMINO TIERRA GRANDE COLLECTOR 1288 1 12 0 1575 35 18 1257 980 694 CAMINO TIERRA GRANDE COLLECTOR 1111 1 12 0 1575 35 18 1258 981 688 CALLE PORTOFINO COLLECTOR 750 1 12 4 1900 30 18 1259 982 661 AVENIDA TALEGA MINOR ARTERIAL 347 3 12 6 1900 45 18 1260 984 660 VIA SUERTE COLLECTOR 700 1 12 0 1900 30 18 1261 985 661 AVENIDA TALEGA COLLECTOR 432 2 12 4 1900 30 18 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K91 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1262 986 657 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 270 2 12 4 1900 45 18 1263 987 657 AVENIDA LA PATA MAJOR ARTERIAL 333 2 12 4 1900 45 18 1264 988 639 CAMINO CELOSIA LOCAL ROADWAY 441 1 12 0 1900 30 21 1265 989 640 CALLE ALICANTE LOCAL ROADWAY 373 1 12 0 1900 30 18 1266 990 640 CALLE ALICANTE LOCAL ROADWAY 366 1 12 0 1900 30 18 1267 991 639 CAMINO CELOSIA LOCAL ROADWAY 444 1 12 0 1900 30 21 1268 992 658 AVENIDA LA PATA MAJOR ARTERIAL 1616 3 12 4 1900 45 18 1269 994 643 AVENIDA LA PATA MINOR ARTERIAL 277 1 12 4 1900 45 18 1270 995 1541 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1355 3 12 4 1900 50 6 1271 996 1488 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1605 3 12 4 1900 55 6 1272 996 1515 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 948 3 12 4 1900 50 6 1273 996 1534 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1473 3 12 4 1900 50 6 1274 1002 1011 LA PAZ RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 826 2 12 4 1900 45 2 1275 1002 1041 LA PAZ RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 846 3 12 4 1900 45 2 1276 1002 1495 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 418 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1277 1003 1004 LA PAZ RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1982 2 12 4 1900 45 7 1278 1004 1005 LA PAZ RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1006 2 12 4 1900 45 6 1279 1005 1013 LA PAZ RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 2959 3 12 4 1900 45 7 1280 1005 1488 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 792 3 12 4 1900 50 6 1281 1005 1536 ALISO CREEK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 380 3 12 4 1900 50 7 1282 1006 1008 ALISO CREEK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 932 2 12 4 1900 50 7 1283 1006 1484 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2111 3 12 4 1900 50 7 1284 1007 1009 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1092 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1285 1007 1481 ALISO NIGUEL COLLECTOR 1120 1 12 0 1575 35 2 1286 1008 1006 ALISO CREEK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 937 1 12 4 1900 50 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K92 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1287 1008 1490 ALISO CREEK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 726 2 12 4 1900 50 7 1288 1009 1051 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 799 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1289 1010 1002 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1391 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1290 1010 1042 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 3144 3 12 4 1900 55 2 1291 1010 1480 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 1724 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1292 1010 1508 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 850 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1293 1011 1002 LA PAZ RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 826 3 12 4 1900 45 2 1294 1011 1012 SJHTC LA PAZ RD RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 1097 2 12 4 1900 30 2 1295 1012 1054 SJHTC LA PAZ RD RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 977 2 12 4 1900 45 2 1296 1013 1485 AVILA RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1042 2 12 4 1900 40 2 1297 1013 1530 LA PAZ RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1315 3 12 4 1900 45 2 1298 1013 1533 AVILA RD COLLECTOR 331 2 12 0 1900 40 2 1299 1014 1480 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 809 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1300 1014 1486 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 1170 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1301 1014 1498 LA PAZ RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1249 3 12 4 1900 45 2 1302 1015 1485 AVILA RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1350 2 12 4 1900 40 1 1303 1015 1527 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 932 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1304 1016 1017 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1552 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1305 1017 1486 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 960 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1306 1017 1492 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 981 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1307 1017 1525 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 1987 3 12 4 1900 50 1 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1308 1018 526 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 2109 3 12 10 2250 70 2 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K93 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1309 1018 1019 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 2937 3 12 8 2250 70 2 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1310 1019 1018 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 2937 3 12 10 2250 70 2 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1311 1019 1020 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 1715 3 12 8 2250 70 2 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1312 1020 1019 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 1715 3 12 10 2250 70 2 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1313 1020 1054 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 985 3 12 8 2250 70 2 1314 1021 1496 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 492 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1315 1021 1510 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1067 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1316 1021 1525 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 896 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1317 1022 1021 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1459 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1318 1023 163 CABOT RD MINOR ARTERIAL 2985 2 12 4 1900 50 2 1319 1025 1040 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 901 2 12 0 1900 45 3 1320 1025 1448 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 889 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1321 1025 1501 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2959 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1322 1028 1045 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 995 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1323 1028 1047 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 727 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1324 1029 1037 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1218 3 12 8 1900 55 3 1325 1029 1047 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 4231 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1326 1029 1438 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 950 3 12 4 1900 55 3 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K94 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1327 1030 1031 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 813 1 12 4 1900 55 4 FOOTHILL TRANSPORTATION 1328 1031 1435 CORIDOR MINOR ARTERIAL 883 2 12 8 1900 45 4 1329 1033 1034 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1911 3 12 4 1900 55 4 1330 1034 1436 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1525 2 12 4 1900 55 4 FOOTHILL TRANSPORTATION 1331 1035 1030 CORIDOR MINOR ARTERIAL 972 2 12 8 1900 55 4 1332 1036 1031 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 907 1 12 4 1900 55 4 1333 1038 1025 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 4036 2 12 0 1900 45 3 1334 1039 1038 FELIPE RD COLLECTOR 618 1 12 4 1900 35 3 1335 1042 1010 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 3148 3 12 4 1900 55 2 1336 1042 1043 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1859 3 12 4 1900 55 2 1337 1043 1042 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1865 3 12 4 1900 55 2 1338 1043 1044 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1499 3 12 4 1900 55 2 1339 1044 163 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2406 3 12 4 1900 55 2 1340 1044 1043 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1503 3 12 4 1900 55 2 1341 1045 1028 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 998 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1342 1045 1445 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2149 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1343 1046 1028 FELIPE RD MINOR ARTERIAL 502 2 12 4 1900 50 3 1344 1047 1028 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 727 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1345 1047 1029 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 4231 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1346 1048 1050 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 820 4 12 4 1900 50 1 1347 1049 1048 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 980 3 12 4 1900 50 1 SJHTC ALISO CREEK RD 1348 1050 1056 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 1087 1 12 0 1350 30 1 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K95 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1349 1050 1497 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 348 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1350 1051 1053 SJHTC LA PAZ RD RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 1374 2 12 4 1900 45 2 1351 1051 1508 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 209 3 12 4 1900 50 2 SJHTC MOULTON PHWY 1352 1052 1009 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 431 1 12 4 1900 45 2 1353 1053 1012 SJHTC LA PAZ RD RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 869 1 12 4 1700 45 2 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1354 1054 1020 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 985 3 12 10 2250 70 2 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1355 1054 1055 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 1372 5 12 8 2250 75 1 1356 1054 1498 SJHTC LA PAZ RD RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 829 1 12 4 1900 45 2 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1357 1055 1054 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 1373 3 12 10 2250 70 1 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1358 1055 1056 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 2733 4 12 10 2250 75 1 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1359 1056 1055 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 2733 3 12 10 2250 75 1 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1360 1056 1057 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 696 4 12 8 2250 70 1 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 1361 1057 1056 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 697 3 12 10 2250 70 1 SJHTC ALISO CREEK RD 1362 1058 1048 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 401 1 12 0 1900 45 1 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K96 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1363 1059 1049 ENTERPRISE MINOR ARTERIAL 395 1 12 0 1900 45 1 1364 1060 10 N. COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 402 2 12 0 1900 45 36 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 1365 1061 1062 EXPY MAJOR ARTERIAL 577 3 12 4 1900 55 36 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 1366 1061 1693 EXPY MAJOR ARTERIAL 168 2 12 4 1900 55 36 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 1367 1062 12 EXPY MAJOR ARTERIAL 176 2 12 4 1900 55 36 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 1368 1063 11 EXPY MAJOR ARTERIAL 58 2 12 0 1900 35 36 I 5 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 1369 1064 17 EXPY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 679 1 12 4 1700 45 36 1370 1065 89 SAN RAFAEL DR COLLECTOR 235 2 12 0 1900 35 36 1371 1066 1065 SAN RAFAEL DR COLLECTOR 879 1 12 0 1575 35 36 1372 1067 1694 N. COAST HWY COLLECTOR 1659 1 12 0 1700 45 36 1373 1068 93 HARBOR DR MINOR ARTERIAL 283 1 12 4 1900 45 36 I 5 HARBOR DRIVE 1374 1068 1069 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 246 1 12 4 1700 45 36 I 5 HARBOR DRIVE 1375 1069 87 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 652 1 12 4 1700 45 36 1376 1070 1066 SAN RAFAEL DR COLLECTOR 739 1 12 0 1575 35 36 1377 1071 1066 CAPISTRANO DR COLLECTOR 823 1 12 0 1575 35 36 1378 1072 933 WIRE MOUNTAIN RD MINOR ARTERIAL 359 1 12 4 1900 40 36 1379 1073 1072 WIRE MOUNTAIN RD MINOR ARTERIAL 952 1 12 4 1700 40 36 1380 1074 1073 WIRE MOUNTAIN RD MINOR ARTERIAL 2026 1 12 4 1700 40 36 1381 1075 1074 WIRE MOUNTAIN RD MINOR ARTERIAL 2628 1 12 4 1700 40 36 1382 1076 1071 CAPISTRANO DR COLLECTOR 617 1 12 0 1575 35 36 1383 1077 1076 CAPISTRANO DR COLLECTOR 637 1 12 0 1575 35 36 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K97 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1384 1078 1077 CAPISTRANO DR COLLECTOR 1036 1 12 0 1575 35 36 1385 1079 1078 CAPISTRANO DR COLLECTOR 1994 1 12 0 1575 35 36 1386 1081 971 WIRE MOUNTAIN RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1520 1 12 4 1700 40 36 1387 1081 1084 CARNES RD COLLECTOR 1054 1 12 4 1575 35 36 1388 1082 970 ASH RD COLLECTOR 1404 1 12 4 1575 35 36 1389 1083 1082 ASH RD COLLECTOR 2211 1 12 4 1575 35 36 1390 1084 1687 CARNES RD COLLECTOR 1077 1 12 4 1575 35 36 1391 1085 970 ASH RD COLLECTOR 1453 1 12 4 1575 35 36 1392 1086 1081 CARNES RD COLLECTOR 1816 1 12 4 1575 35 36 1393 1087 930 ASH RD COLLECTOR 400 2 12 4 1900 40 36 1394 1087 1686 ASH RD COLLECTOR 625 1 12 4 1700 40 36 1395 1088 911 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 4909 2 12 4 1900 50 31 RATTLE SNAKE CANYON 1396 1088 1129 RD COLLECTOR 1514 2 12 4 1900 50 31 1397 1088 1658 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 694 2 12 4 1900 50 31 1398 1089 1090 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 2413 1 12 4 1700 50 31 1399 1089 1658 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1798 1 12 4 1700 50 31 1400 1090 1130 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 2108 2 12 4 1900 40 32 1401 1091 1092 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 966 2 12 4 1900 40 32 1402 1092 1093 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 2259 2 12 4 1900 40 32 1403 1092 1096 FALLBROOK RD COLLECTOR 1232 1 12 4 1700 40 32 1404 1093 1092 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 2259 1 12 4 1900 40 32 1405 1093 1124 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1696 2 12 4 1900 40 32 1406 1094 1095 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1758 2 12 4 1900 50 32 1407 1096 1092 FALLBROOK RD COLLECTOR 1232 1 12 4 1900 40 32 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K98 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1408 1096 1097 FALLBROOK RD COLLECTOR 1117 1 12 4 1700 40 32 1409 1098 1132 SANTA MARGARITA RD COLLECTOR 2061 1 12 4 1700 40 31 1410 1099 1091 CAMP DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 973 1 12 4 1900 35 32 1411 1100 1099 CAMP DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 2712 1 12 4 1575 35 32 1412 1101 1100 CAMP DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 5209 1 12 4 1575 35 32 1413 1102 1116 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 3435 1 12 0 1575 35 28 1414 1103 1102 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 2343 1 12 0 1575 35 23 1415 1104 1103 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 938 1 12 0 1575 35 23 1416 1105 1104 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 1753 1 12 0 1575 35 28 1417 1106 1105 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 925 1 12 0 1350 30 28 1418 1107 1106 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 948 1 12 0 1350 30 28 1419 1108 1107 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 648 1 12 0 1350 30 28 1420 1109 1108 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 715 1 12 0 1350 30 23 1421 1110 1109 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 2098 1 12 0 1575 35 22 1422 1111 1110 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 2140 1 12 0 1575 35 23 1423 1111 1112 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 3742 1 12 0 1575 35 22 1424 1112 1113 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 2240 1 12 0 1575 35 23 1425 1113 1114 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 2253 1 12 0 1575 35 23 1426 1114 1115 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 1696 1 12 0 1575 35 23 1427 1117 921 11TH ST LOCAL ROADWAY 547 1 12 0 1900 35 31 1428 1118 923 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 2275 2 12 4 1900 50 31 1429 1119 1094 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1318 2 12 4 1900 50 32 1430 1120 1119 11 ST MINOR ARTERIAL 930 1 12 0 1900 35 32 1431 1121 1119 11 ST MINOR ARTERIAL 1714 1 12 0 1900 35 32 1432 1122 1124 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1474 2 12 4 1900 40 32 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K99 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1433 1122 1682 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 298 2 12 4 1900 40 32 PACIFIC MARINE CREDIT 1434 1123 1122 UNION DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 913 1 12 0 1900 35 32 1435 1124 1093 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1696 2 12 4 1900 40 32 1436 1124 1122 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1471 2 12 4 1900 40 32 1437 1125 1124 14TH ST LOCAL ROADWAY 927 1 12 0 1900 35 32 1438 1126 1127 16TH ST MINOR ARTERIAL 835 2 12 0 1900 40 32 1439 1127 1093 16TH ST MINOR ARTERIAL 1137 2 12 0 1900 40 32 1440 1128 1093 16TH ST LOCAL ROADWAY 1197 1 12 0 1900 35 32 RATTLE SNAKE CANYON 1441 1129 1088 RD COLLECTOR 1514 2 12 4 1900 50 31 RATTLE SNAKE CANYON 1442 1129 1126 RD COLLECTOR 2810 2 12 4 1900 50 31 1443 1130 1681 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1562 1 12 4 1700 40 32 1444 1131 1089 SANTA MARGARITA RD COLLECTOR 1806 1 12 4 1900 40 31 1445 1132 1131 SANTA MARGARITA RD COLLECTOR 1334 1 12 4 1700 40 31 1446 1133 910 STAGECOACH RD LOCAL ROADWAY 3966 1 12 0 1700 40 31 1447 1134 949 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 1239 1 12 4 1700 40 33 1448 1135 950 DONALD COOK RD COLLECTOR 789 1 12 0 1700 40 33 1449 1136 1135 DONALD COOK RD COLLECTOR 1249 1 12 0 1700 40 33 1450 1137 950 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 597 1 12 4 1700 40 33 1451 1138 1137 PHILLIPS ST COLLECTOR 394 1 12 0 1900 40 33 1452 1139 1138 PHILLIPS ST COLLECTOR 1153 1 12 0 1700 40 33 1453 1140 1139 PHILLIPS ST COLLECTOR 1693 1 12 0 1700 40 33 1454 1141 954 STUART MESA RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1091 1 12 4 1700 45 30 1455 1141 957 STUART MESA RD COLLECTOR 2538 1 12 4 1700 50 30 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K100 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1456 1142 1141 NELSON RD LOCAL ROADWAY 317 2 12 0 1900 30 30 1457 1143 920 LAS PULGAS RD COLLECTOR 340 1 12 4 900 20 30 1458 1144 47 I 5 BASILONE RD RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 853 1 12 4 1700 45 24 1459 1144 99 BASILONE RD MINOR ARTERIAL 559 1 12 0 1700 45 24 1460 1145 1144 OLD PACIFIC HWY MINOR ARTERIAL 528 2 12 4 1900 30 24 1461 1146 1145 OLD PACIFIC HWY MINOR ARTERIAL 3092 2 12 4 1900 45 25 1462 1147 1146 OLD PACIFIC HWY MINOR ARTERIAL 1165 2 12 4 1900 45 25 1463 1148 1159 OLD PACIFIC HWY MINOR ARTERIAL 2754 2 12 4 1900 45 25 1464 1149 1148 OLD PACIFIC HWY MINOR ARTERIAL 2620 1 12 4 1700 45 25 1465 1150 1149 OLD PACIFIC HWY MINOR ARTERIAL 539 1 12 4 1900 45 25 1466 1151 1149 SAN ONOFRE DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 341 1 12 0 1900 30 25 1467 1152 1146 EL CAMINO REAL COLLECTOR 770 1 12 0 1900 40 25 1468 1153 1152 EL CAMINO REAL COLLECTOR 1108 1 12 0 1700 40 25 1469 1154 1153 EL CAMINO REAL COLLECTOR 3585 1 12 0 1700 40 25 SAN ONOFRE ACCESS 1470 1155 1148 ROAD MINOR ARTERIAL 536 1 12 0 450 10 25 SAN ONOFRE ACCESS 1471 1156 1158 ROAD MINOR ARTERIAL 651 1 12 4 900 20 25 SAN ONOFRE ACCESS 1472 1157 1160 ROAD MINOR ARTERIAL 2579 1 12 4 1575 35 25 SAN ONOFRE ACCESS 1473 1158 1155 ROAD MINOR ARTERIAL 1899 1 12 4 1575 35 25 1474 1159 1147 OLD PACIFIC HWY MINOR ARTERIAL 1463 2 12 4 1900 45 25 SAN ONOFRE ACCESS 1475 1160 1156 ROAD MINOR ARTERIAL 854 1 12 4 1575 35 25 1476 1161 110 SAMPSON DR LOCAL ROADWAY 847 1 12 0 1350 30 24 1477 1162 1164 AVENIDA DEL PRESIDENTE COLLECTOR 967 1 12 4 1700 45 24 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K101 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number CONCORDIA ELEMENTARY 1478 1163 1162 SCHOOL DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 882 1 12 0 1900 30 24 1479 1164 114 AVENIDA DEL PRESIDENTE COLLECTOR 1685 1 12 4 1900 45 24 1480 1164 553 FRWY OVERPASS COLLECTOR 362 1 12 0 1900 35 24 1481 1165 753 E AVENIDA SAN GABRIEL COLLECTOR 1068 1 12 4 1575 35 24 1482 1166 1165 E AVENIDA SAN GABRIEL COLLECTOR 1208 1 12 4 1575 35 20 1483 1167 528 W AVENIDA VALENCIA COLLECTOR 261 2 12 4 1900 35 20 1484 1168 778 AVENIDA DE LA RIVIERA LOCAL ROADWAY 630 1 12 0 1350 30 24 I 5 CRISTIANOS RD 1485 1169 102 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 433 1 12 4 1700 45 24 W AVENIDA DE LOS LOBOS 1486 1170 775 MARINOS LOCAL ROADWAY 851 1 12 0 1350 30 24 1487 1171 530 AVENIDA BARECELONA LOCAL ROADWAY 487 1 12 0 1900 30 20 1488 1172 748 E AVENIDA SAN JUAN LOCAL ROADWAY 482 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1489 1173 813 E AVENIDA SAN JUAN LOCAL ROADWAY 794 1 12 0 1900 35 20 1490 1174 1189 AVENIDA CABALLEROS COLLECTOR 330 1 12 0 1900 30 20 1491 1175 120 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 224 1 12 0 1900 35 20 1492 1176 1175 S LA ESPERANZA MINOR ARTERIAL 1281 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1493 1177 1188 AVENIDA CABALLEROS COLLECTOR 895 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1494 1178 755 AVENIDA DE LA ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 651 1 12 0 1900 30 20 1495 1178 1185 AVENIDA DE LA ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 1053 1 12 0 1900 30 20 I 5 AVENIDA PRESIDIO 1496 1179 56 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 521 1 12 4 1700 45 20 I 5 AVENIDA PRESIDIO 1497 1180 120 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 423 1 12 4 1900 45 20 1498 1181 763 S OLA VISTA COLLECTOR 523 1 12 0 1900 30 20 1499 1181 815 AVENIDA VICTORIA LOCAL ROADWAY 858 1 12 0 1900 30 20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K102 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1500 1182 1181 S OLA VISTA COLLECTOR 541 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1501 1183 1181 AVENIDA VICTORIA LOCAL ROADWAY 504 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1502 1184 533 AVENIDA PALIZADA MINOR ARTERIAL 868 1 12 0 1900 35 20 1503 1185 533 AVENIDA PALIZADA MINOR ARTERIAL 217 2 12 0 1900 35 20 1504 1185 1189 AVENIDA PALIZADA MINOR ARTERIAL 493 1 12 0 1900 35 20 1505 1187 1189 AVENIDA CABALLEROS LOCAL ROADWAY 362 1 12 0 1900 30 20 1506 1188 1174 AVENIDA CABALLEROS COLLECTOR 129 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1507 1189 1185 AVENIDA PALIZADA MINOR ARTERIAL 490 2 12 0 1900 35 20 I 5 AVENIDA PALIZADA 1508 1189 1194 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 276 2 12 0 1900 45 20 1509 1190 534 E MARIPOSA LOCAL ROADWAY 393 1 12 0 1900 30 20 1510 1191 534 W MARIPOSA LOCAL ROADWAY 1293 1 12 0 1900 30 20 1511 1192 536 E EL PORTAL LOCAL ROADWAY 587 1 12 0 1900 30 20 1512 1193 536 W EL PORTAL LOCAL ROADWAY 680 1 12 0 1900 30 20 I 5 AVENIDA PALIZADA 1513 1194 57 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 194 1 12 0 1700 45 20 1514 1195 539 CALLE DE LOS MOLINOS LOCAL ROADWAY 498 1 12 0 1900 30 19 1515 1195 616 CALLE DE LOS MOLINOS LOCAL ROADWAY 1711 1 12 0 1900 30 19 1516 1196 616 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 458 2 12 4 1900 50 19 1517 1196 617 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 481 2 12 4 1900 50 20 1518 1197 1196 CALLE DE INDUSTRIAS COLLECTOR 562 2 12 0 1900 35 20 1519 1200 59 I 5 AVENIDA PICO RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 362 1 12 4 1700 45 20 1520 1201 618 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 1127 4 12 4 1900 50 20 1521 1202 1201 PLAZA DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 227 2 12 4 1900 30 20 1522 1203 623 AVENIDA FUENTES LOCAL ROADWAY 323 1 12 0 1350 30 20 1523 1204 623 AVE FACETA LOCAL ROADWAY 1011 1 12 0 1350 30 20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K103 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1524 1205 649 CAMINO FARO LOCAL ROADWAY 635 1 12 0 1900 30 19 1525 1206 649 CAMINO LAUREL LOCAL ROADWAY 474 1 12 0 1900 30 17 1526 1207 671 AVENIDA LA PATA MINOR ARTERIAL 1937 2 12 4 1900 50 20 1527 1208 664 AVENIDA VISTA MONTANA COLLECTOR 1071 1 12 4 1900 35 20 1528 1209 664 CALLE DEL CERRO COLLECTOR 539 2 12 0 1900 35 20 1529 1210 669 CALLE AMANECER COLLECTOR 1399 1 12 0 1900 35 18 1530 1211 1703 CALLE AMANECER COLLECTOR 909 1 12 0 1900 35 18 1531 1212 644 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 844 3 12 4 1900 50 18 WALMART PLAZA 1532 1213 1212 DRIVEWAYS LOCAL ROADWAY 437 1 12 0 1900 30 18 WALMART PLAZA 1533 1214 644 DRIVEWAYS LOCAL ROADWAY 541 1 12 0 1900 30 18 1534 1215 642 PLAZA DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 482 1 12 4 1900 30 18 1535 1216 641 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MINOR ARTERIAL 512 2 12 4 1900 45 18 1536 1217 680 CALLE VISTA DEL SOL LOCAL ROADWAY 1025 1 12 4 1350 30 18 1537 1218 700 AVENIDA LA PATA MINOR ARTERIAL 291 2 12 4 1900 40 18 1538 1219 973 CAMINO TIERRA GRANDE COLLECTOR 295 1 12 0 1575 35 18 WALMART PLAZA 1539 1220 701 DRIVEWAYS COLLECTOR 492 1 12 0 1350 30 18 1540 1221 702 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 402 2 12 0 1900 45 18 1541 1222 1221 VIA PACIFICA LOCAL ROADWAY 910 1 12 0 1900 30 18 1542 1223 702 VIA ASALEA LOCAL ROADWAY 273 1 12 0 1900 30 18 1543 1224 653 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 1074 2 12 0 1900 45 18 1544 1225 1271 VIA CALIFORNIA COLLECTOR 702 1 12 0 1575 35 17 1545 1225 1285 CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS MINOR ARTERIAL 285 2 12 4 1900 45 17 1546 1226 130 CAMINO DE VISTA LOCAL ROADWAY 219 1 12 0 1900 30 17 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K104 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1547 1227 1235 AVENIDA LAS PALMAS LOCAL ROADWAY 1283 1 12 0 1900 30 17 1548 1228 580 CAMINO CAPISTRANO LOCAL ROADWAY 1097 1 12 4 1350 30 17 1549 1229 126 CALLE NARANJA LOCAL ROADWAY 809 1 12 0 1900 30 17 1550 1230 1231 VIA CALIFORNIA COLLECTOR 594 1 12 0 1575 35 16 1551 1230 1238 VIA CANON COLLECTOR 275 1 12 0 1350 30 16 1552 1230 1271 VIA CALIFORNIA COLLECTOR 999 1 12 0 1575 35 17 1553 1231 1230 VIA CALIFORNIA COLLECTOR 594 1 12 0 1575 35 16 1554 1231 1232 VIA CALIFORNIA COLLECTOR 503 1 12 0 1575 35 16 1555 1232 1231 VIA CALIFORNIA COLLECTOR 503 1 12 0 1575 35 16 1556 1232 1233 VIA CALIFORNIA COLLECTOR 993 1 12 0 1575 35 16 1557 1233 578 CAMINO CAPISTRANO LOCAL ROADWAY 575 1 12 4 1350 30 16 1558 1233 579 CAMINO CAPISTRANO LOCAL ROADWAY 723 1 12 4 1350 30 16 1559 1233 1232 VIA CALIFORNIA COLLECTOR 993 1 12 0 1575 35 16 1560 1234 548 PALISADES DR COLLECTOR 923 1 12 0 1900 35 16 1561 1235 589 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 589 2 12 0 1900 45 17 1562 1235 590 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 388 2 12 0 1900 35 17 1563 1236 593 CAMINO MIRA COSTA COLLECTOR 1250 1 12 0 1900 40 17 1564 1237 589 CAMINO MIRA COSTA COLLECTOR 1001 2 12 0 1900 40 17 1565 1238 575 VIA CANON COLLECTOR 1276 1 12 0 1350 30 16 SHOPPING PLAZA 1566 1239 613 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 298 1 12 0 1900 30 17 1567 1240 612 CALLE AQUA LOCAL ROADWAY 737 1 12 0 1900 35 17 1568 1241 718 CAMINO DEL RIO MINOR ARTERIAL 951 2 12 4 1900 40 18 1569 1242 703 CAMINO DE LA LADERAS LOCAL ROADWAY 450 1 12 0 1900 30 18 1570 1243 703 CALLE DE LOS ARBOLES LOCAL ROADWAY 515 1 12 0 1900 30 18 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K105 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1571 1244 704 COLINA RODANTE LOCAL ROADWAY 446 1 12 0 1900 30 18 1572 1245 704 COLINA RODANTE LOCAL ROADWAY 580 1 12 0 1900 30 18 1573 1246 715 CAMINO DE LOS MARES MINOR ARTERIAL 1095 2 12 0 1900 30 17 1574 1247 715 BONANZA LOCAL ROADWAY 490 1 12 0 1350 30 17 1575 1248 711 PORTICO DEL SUR COLLECTOR 1766 1 12 0 1900 35 17 1576 1249 712 CALLE NUEVO COLLECTOR 1041 1 12 0 1900 35 17 1577 1250 1716 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MAJOR ARTERIAL 384 3 12 0 1900 50 19 1578 1251 61 I5 FREEWAY 1250 4 12 4 2250 70 19 1579 1251 122 I5 FREEWAY 430 4 12 4 2250 70 19 I 5 AVENIDA VISTA 1580 1252 1251 HERMOSA RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 744 1 12 0 1350 30 19 I 5 AVENIDA VISTA 1581 1252 1256 HERMOSA RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 206 2 12 0 1900 45 19 1582 1255 1250 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MAJOR ARTERIAL 993 3 12 0 1900 50 19 I 5 AVENIDA VISTA 1583 1256 61 HERMOSA RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 770 1 12 0 1700 45 19 1584 1257 651 VIA TURQUEZA LOCAL ROADWAY 425 1 12 0 1900 30 18 1585 1258 543 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1581 2 12 4 1900 50 19 1586 1258 1660 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2209 1 12 8 1700 45 19 1587 1259 543 CAMINO SAN CLEMENTE LOCAL ROADWAY 671 1 12 0 1900 30 19 1588 1260 636 CALLE GUADALAJARA LOCAL ROADWAY 369 1 12 0 1350 30 17 1589 1261 632 CALLE FRONTERA LOCAL ROADWAY 1326 1 12 0 1350 30 17 1590 1261 1260 CALLE GUADALAJARA LOCAL ROADWAY 874 1 12 0 1350 30 17 1591 1262 1261 CALLE GUADALAJARA LOCAL ROADWAY 1332 1 12 0 1350 30 17 1592 1263 606 CALLE VALLARTA LOCAL ROADWAY 618 1 12 0 1350 30 17 1593 1265 706 VIA BLANCO COLLECTOR 1585 1 12 0 1575 35 17 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K106 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1594 1266 1225 CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS MINOR ARTERIAL 739 2 12 4 1900 45 17 1595 1267 1266 CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS COLLECTOR 1992 1 12 4 1700 45 17 1596 1268 1267 CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS COLLECTOR 1082 1 12 4 1700 45 17 1597 1269 1268 CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS COLLECTOR 1753 1 12 4 1700 45 17 1598 1270 1225 AVENIDA CALIFORNIA COLLECTOR 1197 1 12 0 1900 35 17 1599 1271 1225 VIA CALIFORNIA COLLECTOR 702 1 12 0 1900 35 17 1600 1271 1230 VIA CALIFORNIA COLLECTOR 1010 1 12 0 1575 35 17 1601 1272 1271 CAMINO EL MOLINO COLLECTOR 1684 2 12 0 1900 35 17 1602 1273 1229 CALLE NARANJA LOCAL ROADWAY 1071 2 12 0 1900 30 17 1603 1274 609 MARBELLA LOCAL ROADWAY 650 1 12 0 1900 30 17 1604 1275 599 VIA CASCADITA LOCAL ROADWAY 258 1 12 0 1900 30 19 1605 1276 1275 VIA CASCADITA LOCAL ROADWAY 681 1 12 0 1350 30 19 1606 1277 1275 VIA MONTEGO LOCAL ROADWAY 421 1 12 0 1350 30 19 SHOPPING PLAZA 1607 1278 611 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 193 1 12 0 1900 30 17 SHOPPING PLAZA 1608 1279 610 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 153 1 12 0 1900 30 17 I 5 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA 1609 1280 65 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 294 1 12 0 1700 45 17 1610 1281 549 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 3777 2 12 4 1900 50 16 1611 1282 254 SR 1 DOHENY RD RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 406 1 12 4 1700 45 16 1612 1282 560 DOHENY PARK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 203 2 12 4 1900 45 16 1613 1282 591 DOHENY PARK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 384 1 12 4 1900 45 16 1614 1283 255 CARL'S JR DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 266 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1615 1284 68 I 5 SR 1 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 382 1 12 0 1700 45 16 1616 1285 130 CAMINO LAS RAMBLAS MINOR ARTERIAL 390 3 12 4 1900 45 17 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K107 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1617 1286 1345 SAN JUAN CREEK RD COLLECTOR 4819 1 12 4 1700 45 12 1618 1286 1397 LA NOVIA AVE COLLECTOR 884 1 12 0 1700 40 12 1619 1287 136 VALLE RD COLLECTOR 1563 1 12 0 1900 45 12 1620 1287 1345 SAN JUAN CREEK RD COLLECTOR 342 2 12 4 1900 45 12 1621 1288 1410 LA NOVIA AVE COLLECTOR 1635 1 12 0 1700 40 17 1622 1289 1288 LA NOVIA AVE COLLECTOR 1260 1 12 0 1700 40 17 1623 1290 1289 LA NOVIA AVE COLLECTOR 2311 1 12 0 1700 40 12 1624 1290 1291 LA NOVIA AVE COLLECTOR 1350 2 12 0 1900 40 12 1625 1291 1290 LA NOVIA AVE COLLECTOR 1350 1 12 0 1700 40 12 1626 1291 1726 LA NOVIA AVE COLLECTOR 1556 2 12 0 1900 40 12 1627 1292 1725 SAN JUAN CREEK RD COLLECTOR 1897 2 12 4 1900 45 12 1628 1293 1292 SAN JUAN CREEK RD COLLECTOR 1817 1 12 4 1700 45 12 1629 1294 1293 SAN JUAN CREEK RD COLLECTOR 1584 1 12 4 1700 45 12 1630 1295 1291 VIA ENTRADA LOCAL ROADWAY 1431 1 12 4 1900 35 12 1631 1296 136 VALLE RD COLLECTOR 1134 1 12 0 1900 45 17 1632 1297 164 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1989 3 12 4 1900 55 13 1633 1298 237 NICHOLS INSTITUTE COLLECTOR 787 1 12 0 1750 30 5 1634 1299 1304 COTO DE CAZA COLLECTOR 757 2 12 0 1900 40 4 1635 1300 1299 COTO DE CAZA COLLECTOR 798 2 12 0 1900 40 4 1636 1300 1301 COTO DE CAZA COLLECTOR 3587 2 12 0 1900 40 4 1637 1302 1300 CANTAMAR LOCAL ROADWAY 1338 1 12 0 1350 30 4 1638 1303 1432 OSO PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 2934 2 12 4 1900 55 4 1639 1304 1303 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2878 2 12 4 1900 55 4 1640 1305 1303 BRIDLE PATH LOCAL ROADWAY 606 1 12 0 1900 30 4 1641 1306 1304 S BEND RD LOCAL ROADWAY 3488 2 12 0 1900 30 4 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K108 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1642 1307 1309 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 946 2 12 4 1900 35 16 1643 1307 1675 DANA POINT HARBOR DR MINOR ARTERIAL 363 2 12 4 1900 40 16 1644 1308 256 DANA POINT HARBOR DR MINOR ARTERIAL 621 2 12 4 1900 40 16 1645 1308 1675 DANA POINT HARBOR DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1233 2 12 4 1900 40 16 1646 1309 266 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 699 2 12 4 1900 35 16 1647 1310 1308 PARK LANTERN COLLECTOR 623 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1648 1311 1308 PARK LANTERN COLLECTOR 508 2 12 0 1900 30 16 1649 1312 1307 DANA POINT HARBOR DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1535 2 12 0 1900 35 16 1650 1313 1312 DANA POINT HARBOR DR MINOR ARTERIAL 989 2 12 0 1900 35 16 1651 1314 265 VIOLET LANTERN ST LOCAL ROADWAY 424 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1652 1315 261 VIOLET LANTERN ST LOCAL ROADWAY 821 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1653 1315 385 LA CRESTA DR LOCAL ROADWAY 726 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1654 1315 1317 LA CRESTA DR LOCAL ROADWAY 586 1 12 0 1350 30 16 ST OF THE AMBER 1655 1316 264 LANTERN COLLECTOR 373 1 12 0 1900 30 16 ST OF THE AMBER 1656 1317 262 LANTERN COLLECTOR 927 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1657 1317 1315 LA CRESTA DR LOCAL ROADWAY 586 1 12 0 1350 30 16 1658 1317 1322 LA CRESTA DR LOCAL ROADWAY 965 1 12 0 1350 30 16 1659 1318 385 LA CRESTA DR LOCAL ROADWAY 1242 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1660 1319 269 SELVA DR COLLECTOR 1394 1 12 4 1900 30 15 1661 1321 406 STONEHILL DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1399 2 12 0 1900 45 16 STREET OF THE BLUE 1662 1321 1631 LANTERN COLLECTOR 1089 1 12 0 1350 30 16 STREET OF THE BLUE 1663 1322 263 LANTERN COLLECTOR 1417 1 12 0 1900 30 16 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K109 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number STREET OF THE BLUE 1664 1322 409 LANTERN COLLECTOR 1373 1 12 0 1350 30 16 1665 1323 410 SELVA DR MINOR ARTERIAL 419 1 12 0 1575 35 16 1666 1324 256 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 1095 1 12 0 1900 40 16 1667 1324 396 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 870 2 12 0 1900 40 16 1668 1325 1324 VILLAGE RD LOCAL ROADWAY 582 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1669 1326 405 OCEAN HILL DR COLLECTOR 1856 1 12 0 1900 35 16 1670 1327 405 STONEHILL DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1019 2 12 0 1900 45 16 1671 1328 1327 PALO ALTO ST LOCAL ROADWAY 877 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1672 1329 1327 PALO ALTO ST LOCAL ROADWAY 593 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1673 1330 390 BLUE FIN DR LOCAL ROADWAY 428 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1674 1331 390 BLUE FIN DR LOCAL ROADWAY 550 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1675 1332 390 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 1026 2 12 0 1900 45 16 1676 1332 393 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 1288 2 12 0 1900 45 16 1677 1333 1332 BLUE SAIL DR LOCAL ROADWAY 456 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1678 1334 1336 CAMINO DEL AVION MINOR ARTERIAL 1645 2 12 0 1900 40 16 1679 1334 1692 ALIPAZ ST COLLECTOR 255 1 12 4 1700 40 16 1680 1335 1334 ALIPAZ ST LOCAL ROADWAY 562 1 12 0 1350 30 16 1681 1336 317 CAMINO DEL AVION MINOR ARTERIAL 1385 1 12 0 1900 40 16 1682 1337 1336 VIA POSITIVA COLLECTOR 500 1 12 0 1900 40 11 1683 1338 1722 ALIPAZ ST COLLECTOR 2697 2 12 4 1900 40 11 1684 1339 1338 VIA POSITIVA COLLECTOR 433 1 12 0 1900 40 11 1685 1340 1349 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 422 2 12 0 1900 40 12 1686 1340 1616 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 686 2 12 0 1900 40 12 1687 1341 1340 ALIPAZ ST LOCAL ROADWAY 2463 1 12 0 1900 35 12 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K110 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1688 1342 71 I 5 STONEHILL DR RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 452 1 12 4 1700 45 16 1689 1343 567 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 2242 2 12 0 1900 45 16 1690 1343 569 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 2433 2 12 0 1900 50 17 1691 1344 1343 AVENIDA AEROPUERTO LOCAL ROADWAY 1076 1 12 0 1900 35 16 1692 1345 1286 SAN JUAN CREEK RD COLLECTOR 4819 1 12 4 1900 45 12 1693 1345 1287 SAN JUAN CREEK RD COLLECTOR 342 1 12 4 1900 45 12 1694 1346 573 AVENIDA PADRE LOCAL ROADWAY 353 1 12 0 1900 30 12 1695 1347 328 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 456 2 12 0 1900 35 12 1696 1347 573 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 1244 2 12 0 1900 35 12 1697 1348 1347 AVENIDA GOLONDRINA LOCAL ROADWAY 387 1 12 0 1900 30 12 1698 1349 328 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 852 2 12 0 1900 35 12 1699 1350 1349 PASEO ADELANTO LOCAL ROADWAY 969 1 12 0 1900 35 12 1700 1351 1349 PASEO ADELANTO LOCAL ROADWAY 1342 1 12 0 1900 35 12 1701 1352 329 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 210 1 12 0 1900 30 12 1702 1353 1352 VERDUGO ST COLLECTOR 388 1 12 0 1900 30 12 1703 1354 329 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 259 1 12 0 1900 35 12 1704 1354 1412 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 273 2 12 0 1900 35 12 1705 1355 1354 EL CAMINO REAL COLLECTOR 714 1 12 0 1900 30 12 1706 1356 74 I5 FREEWAY 1941 5 12 4 2250 70 12 1707 1356 75 I5 FREEWAY 770 5 12 4 2250 70 12 1708 1356 138 I 5 SR 74 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 893 2 12 4 1900 45 12 1709 1357 138 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 534 2 12 0 1900 35 12 1710 1358 487 CALLE DE LA ROSA LOCAL ROADWAY 357 1 12 0 1900 30 12 1711 1359 487 CALLE DE LA ROSA LOCAL ROADWAY 766 1 12 0 1900 30 12 1712 1360 488 GOLF CLUB DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1658 2 12 4 1900 35 12 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K111 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1713 1361 466 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 3725 1 12 0 1900 40 7 1714 1362 465 CAMINO CAPISTRANO COLLECTOR 2949 1 12 0 1900 35 7 1715 1363 475 PUERTA REAL COLLECTOR 2755 2 12 0 1900 45 2 1716 1364 475 THE SHOPS BLVD COLLECTOR 488 3 12 0 1900 35 3 1717 1365 476 MEDICAL CENTER DR COLLECTOR 1283 1 12 0 1900 35 3 1718 1366 1365 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 293 1 12 0 1900 30 8 1719 1367 477 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 392 2 12 0 1900 30 3 1720 1368 477 LOS ALTOS COLLECTOR 521 2 12 0 1900 35 3 1721 1369 478 BELLOGENTE LOCAL ROADWAY 382 1 12 0 1900 30 3 1722 1370 478 BELLOGENTE LOCAL ROADWAY 331 1 12 0 1900 30 3 1723 1371 514 CENTER DR COLLECTOR 648 1 12 0 1900 35 3 1724 1372 512 HILLCREST LOCAL ROADWAY 658 1 12 0 1900 30 8 1725 1373 512 HILLCREST LOCAL ROADWAY 625 1 12 0 1900 30 8 1726 1374 511 MEDICAL CENTER DR COLLECTOR 495 2 12 0 1900 35 8 1727 1375 510 S DECK DR LOCAL ROADWAY 325 1 12 0 1900 30 8 1728 1376 509 SHOPS BLVD LOCAL ROADWAY 326 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1729 1377 508 COLLEGE DR W LOCAL ROADWAY 926 1 12 0 1900 35 8 1730 1378 507 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 269 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1731 1379 506 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 301 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1732 1380 147 AVERY PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 881 2 12 0 1900 40 8 1733 1381 1380 AVERY PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 858 2 12 0 1900 40 8 1734 1382 1380 PLATA PL LOCAL ROADWAY 201 1 12 0 1900 30 8 1735 1383 1380 COLLEGE DR COLLECTOR 303 1 12 0 1900 30 8 1736 1384 502 VIA ESCOLAR COLLECTOR 1132 1 12 0 1900 35 7 1737 1385 500 SPOTTED BULL LANE LOCAL ROADWAY 645 1 12 0 1350 30 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K112 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1738 1386 498 VILLAGE RD LOCAL ROADWAY 1669 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1739 1387 494 MISSION HILLS DR LOCAL ROADWAY 1019 1 12 0 1350 30 12 1740 1388 495 HIGHLAND DR LOCAL ROADWAY 722 1 12 0 1350 30 8 1741 1390 473 OSO RD LOCAL ROADWAY 1018 1 12 0 1900 30 12 1742 1391 143 JUNIPERA SERRA RD MINOR ARTERIAL 429 2 12 0 1900 35 12 1743 1392 1391 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 470 1 12 0 1900 30 12 1744 1393 472 LA ZANJA ST COLLECTOR 397 1 12 0 1900 35 12 1745 1394 472 LA ZANJA ST COLLECTOR 926 1 12 0 1900 35 12 1746 1395 1396 ACJACHEMA ST LOCAL ROADWAY 186 1 12 0 1900 30 12 1747 1396 1416 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 977 1 12 0 1575 35 12 1748 1397 177 LA NOVIA AVE MINOR ARTERIAL 1324 2 12 0 1900 40 12 1749 1397 1399 CALLE ARROYO COLLECTOR 807 2 12 0 1900 35 12 1750 1398 1397 CALLE ARROYO COLLECTOR 693 1 12 0 1575 35 12 1751 1399 1397 CALLE ARROYO COLLECTOR 807 1 12 0 1575 35 12 1752 1399 1414 CALLE ARROYO COLLECTOR 608 2 12 0 1900 35 12 1753 1400 139 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 715 1 12 0 1900 40 12 1754 1401 1290 VIA CERRO REBAL LOCAL ROADWAY 921 1 12 0 1350 30 12 1755 1402 166 COLLECTOR COLLECTOR 1005 1 12 0 1900 35 12 1756 1403 191 WINDMILL AVE COLLECTOR 503 1 12 0 1900 35 8 1757 1404 193 WINDMILL AVE COLLECTOR 542 1 12 0 1900 35 8 1758 1405 199 BENJAMIN DRIVE COLLECTOR 766 1 12 4 1900 35 3 1759 1406 482 O'NEILL DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1310 2 12 4 1900 35 3 1760 1407 196 DIRVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 328 1 12 0 1900 30 3 1761 1408 486 SIENNA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 816 2 12 0 1900 35 3 1762 1409 73 I 5 LA NOVIA AVE RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 328 1 12 4 1700 45 12 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K113 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1763 1410 136 LA NOVIA AVE COLLECTOR 768 1 12 0 1900 40 12 1764 1411 331 PLAZA DR LOCAL ROADWAY 288 1 12 0 1900 30 12 1765 1412 330 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 195 1 12 0 1900 40 12 1766 1412 1354 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 273 2 12 0 1900 35 12 1767 1413 76 I 5 SR 74 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 529 1 12 4 1700 45 12 1768 1414 1399 CALLE ARROYO COLLECTOR 608 2 12 0 1900 35 12 1769 1414 1400 RANCHO VIEJO RD MINOR ARTERIAL 388 2 12 0 1900 40 12 1770 1415 1414 CALLE ARROYO LOCAL ROADWAY 626 1 12 0 1900 30 12 1771 1416 472 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 259 2 12 0 1900 35 12 1772 1417 81 I5 FREEWAY 662 5 12 4 2250 70 7 1773 1417 146 I 5 AVERY PKWY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 796 1 12 4 1900 45 7 1774 1417 527 I5 FREEWAY 1364 5 12 4 2250 75 7 1775 1418 505 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 214 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1776 1419 1365 MEDICAL CENTER DR COLLECTOR 707 1 12 0 1900 35 8 1777 1420 857 SKY RANCH DRIVE LOCAL ROADWAY 711 1 12 0 1350 30 8 1778 1421 867 DAISY ST COLLECTOR 529 1 12 0 1575 35 8 1779 1421 880 SIENNA PKWY COLLECTOR 525 1 12 4 1575 35 8 1780 1422 829 O'NEILL DR COLLECTOR 618 2 12 4 1900 40 8 1781 1423 1422 DORRANCE COLLECTOR 206 1 12 0 1350 30 8 1782 1424 481 CECIL PASTURE RD LOCAL ROADWAY 770 1 12 0 1900 55 3 1783 1425 830 CECIL PASTURE RD LOCAL ROADWAY 834 1 12 0 1900 30 8 1784 1426 845 FLINTRIDGE AVE LOCAL ROADWAY 586 1 12 0 1575 35 3 1785 1427 841 MAIN ST LOCAL ROADWAY 729 1 12 0 1350 30 3 1786 1428 841 MAIN ST LOCAL ROADWAY 532 1 12 0 1350 30 3 1787 1429 479 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 974 4 12 4 1900 50 3 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K114 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1788 1429 480 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1145 4 12 4 1900 50 3 1789 1430 1429 JARDINES LOCAL ROADWAY 1031 1 12 0 1900 30 3 1790 1431 195 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 379 3 12 0 1900 45 3 1791 1432 1036 OSO PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 2915 2 12 4 1900 55 4 1792 1433 1432 ALTURA COLLECTOR 711 1 12 0 1900 35 4 1793 1434 1432 ALTURA COLLECTOR 533 1 12 0 1900 35 4 FOOTHILL TRANSPORTATION 1794 1435 1032 CORIDOR MINOR ARTERIAL 398 2 12 0 1900 35 4 1795 1436 1030 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 647 3 12 4 1900 55 4 1796 1437 1436 TESORO CREEK RD COLLECTOR 1000 1 12 0 1900 35 4 1797 1438 1033 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1500 3 12 4 1900 55 4 1798 1439 1033 MEANDERING TRAIL LOCAL ROADWAY 674 1 12 0 1900 35 4 1799 1440 1033 MEANDERING TRAIL LOCAL ROADWAY 882 1 12 0 1900 35 4 1800 1441 1438 MORNING TRAIL LOCAL ROADWAY 755 1 12 0 1900 35 3 1801 1442 1028 FELIPE RD MINOR ARTERIAL 556 2 12 4 1900 50 3 1802 1443 1047 SAN RAFAEL LOCAL ROADWAY 406 1 12 0 1900 30 3 1803 1444 1045 ARUZA LOCAL ROADWAY 357 1 12 0 1900 30 3 1804 1445 1045 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2146 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1805 1445 1448 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 723 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1806 1446 1445 ALPERA LOCAL ROADWAY 431 1 12 0 1900 30 3 1807 1447 1445 ALPERA LOCAL ROADWAY 190 1 12 0 1900 30 3 1808 1448 1025 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 889 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1809 1448 1445 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 723 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1810 1449 1448 ALPERA LOCAL ROADWAY 198 1 12 0 1900 30 3 1811 1450 462 STAR DR LOCAL ROADWAY 607 1 12 0 1900 35 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K115 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1812 1451 467 VILLAMIRA LOCAL ROADWAY 357 1 12 0 1350 30 7 1813 1452 457 DEL CERRO LOCAL ROADWAY 672 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1814 1453 82 I5 FREEWAY 589 5 12 4 2250 70 7 1815 1453 83 I5 FREEWAY 1013 5 12 4 2250 70 7 1816 1454 152 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 106 3 12 4 1900 50 7 I 5 CROWN VALLEY PKWY 1817 1454 153 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 436 2 12 0 1900 35 7 1818 1455 152 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 129 3 12 4 1900 50 7 I 5 CROWN VALLEY PKWY 1819 1455 154 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 631 2 12 4 1900 45 7 PARKING GARAGE 1820 1456 151 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 190 3 12 0 1900 25 2 1821 1457 476 DR GUEVERA WAY COLLECTOR 577 2 12 0 1900 30 3 1822 1458 155 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 930 4 12 4 1900 50 7 1823 1458 308 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 862 3 12 4 1900 50 7 1824 1459 1458 FORBES RD LOCAL ROADWAY 1082 1 12 0 1900 35 7 1825 1460 1458 FORBES RD LOCAL ROADWAY 1080 1 12 0 1900 35 7 1826 1461 471 RAPID FALLS RD LOCAL ROADWAY 1854 1 12 0 1900 30 2 1827 1462 1023 VISTA VIEJO RD LOCAL ROADWAY 1513 1 12 0 1900 35 2 1828 1463 304 GREENFIELD DR LOCAL ROADWAY 1475 2 12 0 1900 30 7 1829 1464 1474 RANCHO NIGUEL RD COLLECTOR 821 2 12 0 1900 35 7 1830 1464 1478 GREENFIELD DR MINOR ARTERIAL 831 2 12 0 1900 40 7 1831 1465 449 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1313 3 12 4 1900 50 7 1832 1465 454 RANCHO NIGUEL RD COLLECTOR 2214 1 12 0 1575 35 7 1833 1465 1477 RANCHO NIGUEL RD COLLECTOR 2513 1 12 0 1575 35 7 1834 1466 1465 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1592 3 12 4 1900 50 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K116 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1835 1467 1466 NUEVA VISTA LOCAL ROADWAY 606 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1836 1468 1466 NUEVA VISTA LOCAL ROADWAY 431 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1837 1469 300 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1427 3 12 4 1900 45 7 1838 1469 1470 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1017 3 12 4 1900 45 7 1839 1470 298 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 814 3 12 4 1900 45 7 1840 1470 1469 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1015 3 12 4 1900 45 7 1841 1471 1469 NUEVA VISTA LOCAL ROADWAY 525 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1842 1472 1469 NUEVA VISTA LOCAL ROADWAY 730 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1843 1473 1470 ADELANTO DR LOCAL ROADWAY 675 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1844 1474 1464 RANCHO NIGUEL RD COLLECTOR 821 2 12 0 1900 35 7 1845 1474 1477 RANCHO NIGUEL RD COLLECTOR 506 2 12 0 1900 35 7 1846 1475 1474 PLAZA DRIVEWAYS LOCAL ROADWAY 342 2 12 0 1900 30 7 1847 1476 1474 PLAZA DRIVEWAYS LOCAL ROADWAY 444 2 12 0 1900 30 7 1848 1477 1465 RANCHO NIGUEL RD COLLECTOR 2512 1 12 0 1900 35 7 1849 1477 1474 RANCHO NIGUEL RD COLLECTOR 506 2 12 0 1900 35 7 1850 1478 306 GREENFIELD DR MINOR ARTERIAL 487 2 12 0 1900 40 7 SJHTC GREENFIELD DR 1851 1479 526 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 866 1 12 4 1700 45 7 1852 1480 1010 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 1723 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1853 1480 1014 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 808 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1854 1481 1480 ALISO NIGUEL COLLECTOR 1245 1 12 0 1900 35 2 1855 1482 1007 ALISO NIGUEL COLLECTOR 1673 1 12 0 1900 35 2 1856 1483 1006 ALISO CREEK RD LOCAL ROADWAY 1134 2 12 0 1900 30 7 1857 1484 1007 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1233 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1858 1484 1533 AVILA RD COLLECTOR 1169 1 12 0 1575 35 2 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K117 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1859 1485 1013 AVILA RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1040 2 12 4 1900 40 2 1860 1485 1015 AVILA RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1342 1 12 4 1900 40 1 1861 1485 1486 HEATHER RIDGE COLLECTOR 2468 1 12 0 1900 35 1 1862 1486 1014 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 1172 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1863 1486 1017 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 984 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1864 1487 1485 PARKING LOT ACCESS RD COLLECTOR 638 2 12 0 1900 35 1 1865 1488 996 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1604 3 12 4 1900 50 6 1866 1488 1005 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 792 3 12 4 1900 50 6 1867 1489 1488 DORINE RD LOCAL ROADWAY 463 1 12 0 1900 30 6 1868 1490 1008 ALISO CREEK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 725 2 12 4 1900 50 7 1869 1490 1536 ALISO CREEK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1171 2 12 4 1900 50 7 1870 1491 1490 NIGUEL HEIGHTS BLVD LOCAL ROADWAY 843 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1871 1492 1493 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1282 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1872 1494 1492 MORNING RIDGE LOCAL ROADWAY 405 1 12 0 1900 30 1 1873 1497 1500 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 266 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1874 1498 1011 LA PAZ RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1132 3 12 4 1900 45 2 SJHTC ALISO CREEK RD 1875 1499 1497 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 711 1 12 0 1900 45 1 1876 1501 157 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 331 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1877 1501 1025 OSO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2959 3 12 4 1900 55 3 1878 1501 1502 I 5 OSO PKWY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 450 1 12 0 1700 45 3 1879 1502 161 I 5 OSO PKWY RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 662 2 12 0 1900 45 2 1880 1504 1042 NELLIE GAIL RD LOCAL ROADWAY 694 1 12 0 1900 30 2 1881 1505 1042 NELLIE GAIL RD LOCAL ROADWAY 825 1 12 0 1900 30 2 1882 1506 1044 BRIDLEWOOD DR LOCAL ROADWAY 691 1 12 0 1900 30 2 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K118 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1883 1507 1044 BRIDLEWOOD DR LOCAL ROADWAY 781 1 12 0 1900 30 2 1884 1508 1010 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 848 3 12 4 1900 50 2 1885 1508 1051 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 208 1 12 4 1900 50 2 1886 1509 1508 NELLIE GRAIL RD LOCAL ROADWAY 1004 1 12 0 1900 30 2 1887 1510 1049 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1091 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1888 1511 1510 AUTUMNGLEN LOCAL ROADWAY 940 1 12 0 1900 30 1 1889 1512 1022 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1111 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1890 1513 1520 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 655 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1891 1514 1513 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 996 3 12 4 1900 50 6 1892 1515 1514 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 991 3 12 4 1900 50 6 1893 1516 1515 WOOD CANYON DR COLLECTOR 457 1 12 0 1900 35 6 1894 1517 1514 PURSUIT COLLECTOR 452 1 12 0 1900 35 6 1895 1518 1514 GELNHURST COLLECTOR 495 1 12 0 1900 35 6 1896 1519 1513 LIBERTY COLLECTOR 912 1 12 0 1900 40 6 1897 1520 1512 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1092 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1898 1521 1520 LOMA CANTE LOCAL ROADWAY 317 1 12 0 1900 30 1 1899 1522 1512 WOLVERINE WAY COLLECTOR 587 1 12 0 1900 35 1 1900 1523 1512 ALISO VIEJO PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 537 1 12 4 1900 45 1 1901 1524 1022 JOURNEY COLLECTOR 436 1 12 0 1900 35 1 1902 1525 1017 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 1992 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1903 1525 1021 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 896 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1904 1526 1525 DEERHURST COLLECTOR 593 1 12 0 1900 35 1 1905 1527 1016 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 719 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1906 1528 1016 PLAZA DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 256 1 12 0 1900 30 1 1907 1529 1527 PLAZA DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 314 1 12 0 1900 30 1 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K119 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1908 1530 1014 LA PAZ RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 859 3 12 4 1900 45 2 1909 1531 1530 AVENIDA BREVE LOCAL ROADWAY 345 1 12 0 1900 30 2 1910 1532 1530 PLAZA DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 249 1 12 0 1900 30 2 1911 1533 1013 AVILA RD COLLECTOR 331 2 12 0 1900 40 2 1912 1533 1484 AVILA RD COLLECTOR 1169 1 12 0 1900 35 2 1913 1534 1015 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1190 3 12 4 1900 50 1 1914 1535 1534 PARKING LOT ACCESS LOCAL ROADWAY 276 1 12 0 1900 30 6 1915 1536 1005 ALISO CREEK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 379 3 12 4 1900 50 7 1916 1536 1490 ALISO CREEK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1171 2 12 4 1900 50 7 1917 1537 300 GOLDEN LANTERN MAJOR ARTERIAL 2003 3 12 4 1900 50 7 1918 1538 1537 PASEO ESCUELA LOCAL ROADWAY 479 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1919 1539 450 KINGS RD LOCAL ROADWAY 689 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1920 1540 450 KINGS RD LOCAL ROADWAY 602 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1921 1541 996 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1657 3 12 4 1900 50 6 1922 1542 995 KITE HILL DR LOCAL ROADWAY 782 1 12 0 1900 30 6 1923 1543 443 HIGHLANDS AVE COLLECTOR 2274 1 12 4 1900 40 6 1924 1544 441 KITE HILL DR LOCAL ROADWAY 1703 1 12 0 1900 30 6 1925 1545 437 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1449 1 12 4 1900 45 6 1926 1546 435 HIGHLANDS AVE COLLECTOR 983 1 12 0 1900 40 6 1927 1547 434 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 736 3 12 4 1900 45 10 1928 1548 1547 HILLHURST DR LOCAL ROADWAY 688 1 12 0 1900 30 10 1929 1549 1550 CLUBHOUSE DR COLLECTOR 1265 1 12 0 1575 35 10 1930 1550 431 CLUBHOUSE DR COLLECTOR 1191 1 12 0 1575 35 10 1931 1551 373 CLUBHOUSE DR COLLECTOR 1610 1 12 0 1900 35 10 1932 1551 1552 CLUBHOUSE DR COLLECTOR 1150 1 12 0 1575 35 10 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K120 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1933 1552 291 CLUBHOUSE DR COLLECTOR 1185 1 12 0 1900 35 10 1934 1553 437 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 604 2 12 4 1900 45 6 1935 1554 1553 IVY GLENN DR COLLECTOR 1977 1 12 0 1900 35 6 1936 1555 296 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 989 3 12 4 1900 45 7 1937 1555 1672 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 886 3 12 4 1900 45 6 CROWN VALLEY PKWY 1938 1556 1555 ACCESS RD LOCAL ROADWAY 531 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1939 1557 296 PARKSIDE DR LOCAL ROADWAY 364 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1940 1558 296 CENTRAL PARK DR LOCAL ROADWAY 522 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1941 1559 296 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1783 3 12 4 1900 45 7 1942 1559 298 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1081 3 12 4 1900 45 7 1943 1560 1559 LA PLATA DR LOCAL ROADWAY 871 1 12 0 1900 35 7 1944 1561 377 LA HERMOSA AVE LOCAL ROADWAY 859 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1945 1562 377 LA HERMOSA AVE LOCAL ROADWAY 1142 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1946 1563 375 AUGUSTA DR LOCAL ROADWAY 1011 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1947 1564 1559 LA PLATA DR LOCAL ROADWAY 707 1 12 0 1900 35 7 1948 1565 431 CLUBHOUSE DR COLLECTOR 1591 1 12 0 1575 35 10 1949 1566 416 VALLE VISTA DR LOCAL ROADWAY 1016 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1950 1567 416 PARC VISTA LOCAL ROADWAY 1013 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1951 1568 414 TROPEA LOCAL ROADWAY 504 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1952 1569 414 PARC VISTA LOCAL ROADWAY 1297 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1953 1570 414 MARINA HILLS RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1312 2 12 4 1900 40 11 1954 1570 418 MARINA HILLS RD MINOR ARTERIAL 803 2 12 4 1900 40 11 1955 1571 1570 TESSIER LOCAL ROADWAY 605 1 12 0 1900 30 7 1956 1572 418 CAMINO PADRES LOCAL ROADWAY 804 2 12 0 1900 30 11 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K121 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1957 1573 360 GOLDEN LANTERN MAJOR ARTERIAL 2217 3 12 4 1900 50 7 1958 1574 1573 HIDDEN HILLS RD COLLECTOR 1359 1 12 0 1900 35 7 1959 1575 357 SWEET MEADOW LANE LOCAL ROADWAY 854 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1960 1576 357 SWEET MEADOW LANE LOCAL ROADWAY 653 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1961 1577 355 CHAPPAROSA PARK RD COLLECTOR 2313 1 12 0 1900 35 11 1962 1578 352 ST CHRISTOPHER LOCAL ROADWAY 1070 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1963 1579 350 ST CHRISTOPHER LOCAL ROADWAY 1167 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1964 1580 348 BEACON HILL RD COLLECTOR 1298 1 12 0 1900 35 11 1965 1581 368 RIDGEWAY AVE COLLECTOR 2547 1 12 0 1900 35 11 1966 1582 372 BEACON HILL RD COLLECTOR 2727 1 12 0 1900 35 11 1967 1583 346 OLD RANCH RD LOCAL ROADWAY 1186 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1968 1584 346 BEAR BRAND RD COLLECTOR 1249 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1969 1585 344 VIA LADERA LOCAL ROADWAY 295 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1970 1586 283 SEA ISLAND DRIVE LOCAL ROADWAY 1216 1 12 0 1900 30 10 1971 1587 341 S PEAK LOCAL ROADWAY 847 1 12 0 1900 30 10 1972 1588 341 S PEAK LOCAL ROADWAY 959 1 12 0 1900 30 10 1973 1589 341 CAMINO DEL AVION MINOR ARTERIAL 1592 2 12 0 1900 45 10 1974 1590 1589 BARKENTINE LOCAL ROADWAY 658 1 12 0 1900 30 10 1975 1591 1589 CORNICHE RD LOCAL ROADWAY 657 1 12 0 1900 30 10 1976 1592 366 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 513 2 12 4 1900 45 10 1977 1593 366 CHARLES RD LOCAL ROADWAY 769 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1978 1594 1551 S PEAK LOCAL ROADWAY 1488 1 12 0 1350 30 10 MONARCH BEACH RESORT 1979 1595 400 N LOCAL ROADWAY 383 1 12 0 1900 30 15 1980 1596 338 NIGUEL RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 1033 3 12 4 1900 45 10 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K122 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 1981 1597 1596 MONARCH BEACH DR LOCAL ROADWAY 1056 1 12 0 1900 30 15 1982 1598 270 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 679 2 12 4 1900 45 15 1983 1598 402 NIGUEL RD MINOR ARTERIAL 928 2 12 4 1900 45 15 1984 1599 1598 MARINE DR LOCAL ROADWAY 599 1 12 0 1900 30 15 1985 1600 335 BEAR BRAND RD COLLECTOR 1513 1 12 0 1900 35 11 1986 1601 335 CAMINO DEL AVION MINOR ARTERIAL 1164 2 12 0 1900 50 11 1987 1602 1601 PLAZA DRIVEWAYS LOCAL ROADWAY 366 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1988 1603 344 PLAZA DRIVEWAYS LOCAL ROADWAY 254 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1989 1604 381 TERRA VISTA LOCAL ROADWAY 795 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1990 1605 381 PLAZA DRIVEWWAYS LOCAL ROADWAY 297 1 12 0 1900 30 11 1991 1606 381 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 1637 2 12 4 1900 45 16 1992 1607 1606 DANA WOODS LOCAL ROADWAY 664 1 12 0 1350 30 16 1993 1608 1606 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 342 2 12 4 1900 45 16 1994 1609 1608 JOSIAH RD LOCAL ROADWAY 1081 1 12 0 1350 30 16 1995 1610 383 GOLDEN LANTERN LOCAL ROADWAY 1039 2 12 0 1900 40 16 1996 1610 1608 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 1742 2 12 4 1900 45 16 1997 1611 1610 ACAPULCO DR COLLECTOR 985 2 12 0 1900 30 16 1998 1612 1610 CHELTAM WAY LOCAL ROADWAY 834 1 12 0 1900 30 16 1999 1613 350 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 962 2 12 4 1900 50 11 2000 1614 350 SARDINA LN LOCAL ROADWAY 636 1 12 0 1900 30 11 2001 1615 357 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 602 3 12 4 1900 50 11 2002 1616 1340 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 686 2 12 0 1900 40 12 2003 1616 1623 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 713 2 12 0 1900 40 11 2004 1617 1616 VIA BELARDES LOCAL ROADWAY 1326 1 12 0 1900 30 11 2005 1618 1616 VIA BELARDES LOCAL ROADWAY 696 1 12 0 1900 30 12 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K123 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 2006 1619 324 AGUACATE RD LOCAL ROADWAY 896 1 12 0 1900 30 11 2007 1620 323 CALLE ASPERO LOCAL ROADWAY 2332 1 12 0 1900 30 11 2008 1621 323 CALLE ASPERO LOCAL ROADWAY 595 1 12 0 1900 30 11 2009 1622 319 PLAZA DRIVEWAYS LOCAL ROADWAY 473 1 12 0 1900 30 11 2010 1623 324 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 522 1 12 0 1900 40 11 2011 1623 1616 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 713 2 12 0 1900 40 11 2012 1624 319 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 536 2 12 0 1900 40 11 2013 1624 320 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 752 1 12 0 1700 40 11 2014 1625 313 PACIFIC CREST LOCAL ROADWAY 300 1 12 0 1900 30 11 2015 1626 313 ENCANTAMAR LOCAL ROADWAY 221 1 12 0 1900 30 11 2016 1627 411 CALLE LA PRIMAVERA LOCAL ROADWAY 1040 1 12 0 1350 30 16 2017 1628 257 CRYSTAL LANTERN ST LOCAL ROADWAY 565 1 12 0 1900 30 16 2018 1629 1323 CHULA VISTA AVE LOCAL ROADWAY 913 1 12 0 1350 30 16 2019 1630 1323 CHULA VISTA AVE LOCAL ROADWAY 702 1 12 0 1350 30 16 STREET OF THE BLUE 2020 1631 409 LANTERN COLLECTOR 680 1 12 0 1350 30 16 STREET OF THE BLUE 2021 1631 1321 LANTERN COLLECTOR 1088 1 12 0 1900 30 16 2022 1632 1631 ALTA VISTA DR LOCAL ROADWAY 587 1 12 0 1350 30 16 2023 1633 1631 VIA DE LA LUZ LOCAL ROADWAY 527 1 12 0 1350 30 16 2024 1634 407 MONARCH BEACH DR LOCAL ROADWAY 1392 1 12 0 1350 30 16 2025 1635 407 NIGUEL SHORES DR LOCAL ROADWAY 626 1 12 0 1350 30 15 2026 1636 256 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 643 1 12 0 1900 45 16 2027 1636 257 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 281 2 12 0 1900 45 16 2028 1637 257 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 290 3 12 0 1900 45 16 2029 1637 258 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 856 2 12 0 1900 45 16 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K124 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 2030 1638 1307 GOLDEN LANTERN COLLECTOR 392 1 12 0 1900 35 16 2031 1639 1643 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 478 3 12 4 1900 35 16 2032 1640 264 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 718 3 12 4 1900 35 16 2033 1641 263 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 852 2 12 4 1900 40 16 2034 1642 1318 LA CRESTA DR LOCAL ROADWAY 890 1 12 0 1350 30 16 2035 1643 258 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 195 2 12 4 1900 35 16 2036 1643 259 SR 1 LOCAL ROADWAY 205 1 12 0 900 20 16 2037 1644 270 RITZ CARLTON DR COLLECTOR 838 2 12 0 1900 35 15 2038 1645 271 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 2209 2 12 4 1900 50 15 2039 1645 272 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 861 2 12 4 1900 45 15 2040 1646 1645 MONARCH LOCAL ROADWAY 286 1 12 0 1900 30 15 2041 1647 273 VISTA DEL SOL LOCAL ROADWAY 648 1 12 0 1900 30 10 2042 1648 273 VISTA DEL SOL LOCAL ROADWAY 582 1 12 0 1900 30 10 2043 1649 281 7 SEAS DR LOCAL ROADWAY 775 1 12 0 1350 30 10 2044 1650 1649 7 SEAS DR LOCAL ROADWAY 1600 1 12 0 1350 30 10 2045 1651 275 9TH AVE LOCAL ROADWAY 522 1 12 0 1900 30 10 2046 1652 276 7TH AVE LOCAL ROADWAY 554 1 12 0 1900 30 10 2047 1653 277 3RD AVE LOCAL ROADWAY 599 1 12 0 1900 30 10 2048 1654 278 WEST ST LOCAL ROADWAY 220 1 12 0 1900 30 10 2049 1655 278 BLUFF DR LOCAL ROADWAY 452 1 12 0 1900 30 10 2050 1656 92 HARBOR DR MINOR ARTERIAL 144 2 12 4 1900 45 36 I 5 CRISTIANOS RD 2051 1657 104 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 242 1 12 4 1900 45 24 2052 1658 1088 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 694 2 12 4 1900 50 31 2053 1658 1089 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1798 1 12 4 1900 50 31 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K125 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 2054 1659 542 AVENIDA ESTACION LOCAL ROADWAY 317 1 12 0 1900 30 19 2055 1660 542 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 310 2 12 0 1900 35 19 2056 1660 1258 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 2209 1 12 8 1700 45 19 2057 1661 548 BEACH RD LOCAL ROADWAY 217 1 12 0 1900 30 17 2058 1662 561 VICTORIA BLVD COLLECTOR 542 1 12 0 1900 35 16 2059 1663 561 DOHENY PARK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 1230 2 12 4 1900 35 16 2060 1663 1665 DOHENY PARK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 741 2 12 4 1900 40 16 2061 1664 1663 PLAZA DRIVEWAYS COLLECTOR 325 1 12 0 1900 30 16 2062 1665 563 DOHENY PARK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 778 1 12 4 1900 40 16 2063 1665 1663 DOHENY PARK RD MINOR ARTERIAL 739 2 12 4 1900 40 16 I 5 CAMINO CAPISTRANO 2064 1666 571 RAMPS FREEWAY RAMP 292 1 12 0 1900 30 12 2065 1667 571 CAMINO CAPISTRANO MINOR ARTERIAL 196 1 12 0 1900 45 12 2066 1668 1391 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 383 1 12 0 1900 30 12 2067 1669 488 MARBELLA PLAZA LOCAL ROADWAY 312 1 12 0 1900 30 12 2068 1670 481 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 1028 4 12 4 1900 55 3 2069 1670 482 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 554 3 12 4 1900 60 3 2070 1671 1429 JARDINES LOCAL ROADWAY 616 1 12 0 1900 30 3 2071 1672 294 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 564 1 12 4 1900 45 6 2072 1672 1555 CROWN VALLEY PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 885 3 12 4 1900 45 6 2073 1673 272 MONARCH BAY DR LOCAL ROADWAY 762 2 12 0 1900 30 15 2074 1674 267 SHORELINE DR LOCAL ROADWAY 842 1 12 0 1900 30 15 2075 1675 1307 DANA POINT HARBOR DR MINOR ARTERIAL 415 1 12 4 1900 40 16 2076 1675 1308 DANA POINT HARBOR DR MINOR ARTERIAL 1238 2 12 4 1900 40 16 2077 1676 799 BASILONE RD COLLECTOR 2157 1 12 4 1575 35 25 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K126 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 2078 1677 1676 DE LA GARZA LOCAL ROADWAY 981 1 12 0 1900 30 25 2079 1678 1676 BEACH CLUB RD LOCAL ROADWAY 646 1 12 0 1900 30 25 2080 1679 940 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1128 2 12 4 1900 45 31 2081 1680 1088 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 4362 1 12 4 1900 45 31 2082 1681 1091 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 289 2 12 4 1900 40 32 2083 1682 1119 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1266 2 12 4 1900 40 32 2084 1683 940 ADMINISTRATION RD LOCAL ROADWAY 1531 1 12 0 1900 30 31 2085 1684 939 9TH ST COLLECTOR 441 1 12 0 1900 30 31 2086 1685 922 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1418 2 12 4 1900 45 31 2087 1686 1083 ASH RD COLLECTOR 133 1 12 4 1700 40 36 2088 1686 1087 ASH RD COLLECTOR 625 2 12 4 1900 40 36 2089 1687 1083 CARNES RD COLLECTOR 157 1 12 0 1575 35 36 2090 1687 1686 CARNES RD LOCAL ROADWAY 176 1 12 0 1350 30 36 2091 1688 1137 PHILLIPS ST COLLECTOR 913 1 12 0 1900 35 33 2092 1689 260 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 243 1 12 4 1900 35 16 2093 1689 385 GOLDEN LANTERN MINOR ARTERIAL 445 2 12 4 1900 35 16 2094 1690 317 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 769 1 12 0 1900 45 16 2095 1690 390 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 1313 2 12 0 1900 45 16 2096 1691 352 COCO BEACH LOCAL ROADWAY 323 1 12 0 1900 30 11 2097 1692 1338 ALIPAZ ST COLLECTOR 1120 2 12 4 1900 40 11 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 2098 1693 10 EXPY MAJOR ARTERIAL 576 2 12 4 1900 55 36 SAN LUIS REY MISSION 2099 1693 1063 EXPY MAJOR ARTERIAL 60 2 12 0 1900 35 36 2100 1694 1060 N. COAST HWY COLLECTOR 1101 1 12 0 1700 45 36 2101 1695 1696 RIVERTREE DR LOCAL ROADWAY 432 1 12 0 1350 30 35 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K127 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 2102 1697 1160 BEACH CLUB ROAD COLLECTOR 247 1 12 0 675 15 25 2103 1698 615 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA COLLECTOR 832 1 12 0 1900 35 19 2104 1699 614 RECLAMATION POINT LOCAL ROADWAY 467 1 12 0 1900 30 19 2105 1700 653 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 277 1 12 0 1900 40 18 2106 1700 703 CAMINO VERA CRUZ MINOR ARTERIAL 518 2 12 0 1900 40 18 2107 1701 655 PLAZA DRIVEWAYS LOCAL ROADWAY 304 1 12 0 1900 30 18 2108 1702 691 CALLE CAREYES COLLECTOR 985 1 12 0 1900 30 18 2109 1703 646 CALLE AMANECER COLLECTOR 712 1 12 0 1900 35 18 2110 1704 1703 CALLE NEGOCIO COLLECTOR 1529 1 12 0 1900 35 18 2111 1705 1703 CALLE NEGOCIO LOCAL ROADWAY 257 1 12 0 1900 30 20 2112 1706 588 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 254 1 12 0 1700 45 17 2113 1706 589 CAMINO DE ESTRELLA MINOR ARTERIAL 1189 2 12 0 1900 45 17 SR 1 COAST HWY 2114 1707 1709 CONNECTOR COLLECTOR 177 1 12 0 1700 40 16 2115 1708 1707 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 154 1 12 0 1350 30 16 SR 1 COAST HWY 2116 1709 549 CONNECTOR COLLECTOR 581 1 12 0 1700 40 16 2117 1710 1709 PARK LANTERN LOCAL ROADWAY 361 1 12 0 1350 30 16 2118 1711 266 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 374 2 12 4 1900 35 16 2119 1712 317 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 430 1 12 0 1900 40 11 2120 1712 319 DEL OBISPO ST MINOR ARTERIAL 2081 2 12 0 1900 40 11 2121 1713 119 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 218 1 12 0 1900 40 20 2122 1713 528 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 419 2 12 0 1900 40 20 2123 1714 120 AVENIDA PRESIDIO COLLECTOR 282 1 12 0 1900 35 20 2124 1715 121 AVENIDA PICO MAJOR ARTERIAL 293 1 12 4 1900 50 20 2125 1716 1252 AVENIDA VISTA HERMOSA MAJOR ARTERIAL 287 1 12 0 1700 50 19 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K128 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number 2126 1717 541 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 203 1 12 4 1900 55 19 2127 1717 542 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 232 2 12 4 1900 35 19 2128 1718 540 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 489 2 12 4 1900 35 19 2129 1718 541 S EL CAMINO REAL MAJOR ARTERIAL 196 1 12 4 1900 35 19 2130 1719 543 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 442 1 12 4 1900 50 19 2131 1719 544 COAST HWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 397 1 12 4 1900 50 19 2132 1720 393 STONEHILL DR MINOR ARTERIAL 2356 2 12 0 1900 45 16 2133 1720 563 STONEHILL DR COLLECTOR 497 1 12 0 1900 45 16 2134 1721 1287 SAN JUAN CREEK RD COLLECTOR 341 1 12 4 1900 45 12 2135 1722 1340 ALIPAZ ST COLLECTOR 331 1 12 4 1900 40 12 2136 1723 1357 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 150 2 12 0 1900 35 12 2137 1724 138 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 372 1 12 0 1900 45 12 2138 1724 139 SR 74 MAJOR ARTERIAL 541 1 12 0 1900 45 12 2139 1725 1286 SAN JUAN CREEK RD COLLECTOR 395 1 12 4 1900 45 12 2140 1726 1286 LA NOVIA AVE COLLECTOR 445 1 12 0 1900 40 12 2141 1727 144 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 247 1 12 0 1900 30 11 2142 1728 1361 CAMINO CAPISTRANO FREEWAY 4740 1 12 10 1700 45 7 2143 1729 140 JUNIPERA SERRA RD MINOR ARTERIAL 131 1 12 0 1900 35 12 2144 1730 177 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 259 1 12 0 1900 30 12 2145 1731 541 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 132 1 12 0 1900 30 19 2146 1732 532 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 110 1 12 0 1900 30 20 2147 1733 812 DRIVEWAY LOCAL ROADWAY 75 1 12 0 1900 30 24 2148 1734 86 I5 FREEWAY 1037 5 12 4 2250 70 2 2149 1735 17 I5 FREEWAY 351 4 12 4 2250 70 36 2150 8003 1735 I5 FREEWAY 340 4 12 4 2250 70 36 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K129 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION 2151 8057 1057 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 309 3 12 10 2250 70 1 EXIT LINK 2 8002 N. COAST HWY MINOR ARTERIAL 308 2 12 0 1900 40 36 EXIT SAN LUIS REY MISSION LINK 14 8014 EXPY MAJOR ARTERIAL 819 2 12 4 1900 55 36 EXIT LINK 1495 8495 MOULTON PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 236 3 12 4 1900 50 2 EXIT LINK 1496 8496 PACIFIC PARK DR MAJOR ARTERIAL 235 3 12 4 1900 50 1 EXIT LINK 1500 8497 ALISO CREEK RD MAJOR ARTERIAL 155 3 12 4 1900 55 1 EXIT LINK 1503 8503 CABOT RD MINOR ARTERIAL 296 2 12 4 1900 50 2 EXIT LINK 280 8280 SR 1 MAJOR ARTERIAL 662 2 12 4 1900 45 10 EXIT LINK 249 8818 SR 74 COLLECTOR 601 1 12 2 1700 55 5 EXIT LINK 1095 8095 VANDERGRIFT BLVD MINOR ARTERIAL 1386 2 12 4 1900 50 32 EXIT LINK 1097 8097 FALLBROOK RD COLLECTOR 1240 1 12 4 1700 40 32 EXIT LINK 1115 8115 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 997 1 12 0 1575 35 23 EXIT LINK 1116 8116 DE LUZ RD COLLECTOR 900 1 12 0 1575 35 28 FOOTHILL EXIT TRANSPORTATION LINK 1032 8032 CORIDOR FREEWAY 874 2 12 8 2250 70 4 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K130 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Saturation Free Up Down Lane Shoulder Flow Flow Link Stream Stream Length No. of Width Width Rate Speed Grid

1. Node Node Roadway Name Roadway Type (ft.) Lanes (ft.) (ft.) (pcphpl) (mph) Number EXIT LINK 1037 8037 ANTONIO PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 667 3 12 8 1900 55 3 EXIT LINK 1040 8040 MARGUERITE PKWY MINOR ARTERIAL 533 2 12 0 1900 45 3 EXIT LINK 1041 8041 LA PAZ RD MINOR ARTERIAL 252 2 12 4 1900 45 2 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS EXIT TRANSPORTATION LINK 1057 8057 CORRIDOR FREEWAY 309 4 12 8 2250 70 1 EXIT LINK 1301 8301 COTO DE CAZA COLLECTOR 494 2 12 0 1900 40 4 EXIT LINK 1493 8493 ALICIA PKWY MAJOR ARTERIAL 151 3 12 4 1900 50 1 EXIT LINK 1696 8696 RIVERTREE DR LOCAL ROADWAY 385 1 12 0 1350 30 35 EXIT LINK 1734 8087 I5 FREEWAY 945 5 12 4 2250 70 2 EXIT LINK 1735 8003 I5 FREEWAY 339 4 12 4 2250 70 36 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K131 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table K2. Nodes in the LinkNode Analysis Network which are Controlled X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 10 6214771 2018873 Actuated 36 11 6214908 2019310 Actuated 36 12 6215213 2020301 Actuated 36 89 6213940 2022839 Actuated 36 93 6213418 2021785 Actuated 36 101 6155271 2087217 Stop 24 TCP 103 6151573 2089996 Uncontrolled 24 104 6152013 2090242 TCP Actuated 24 109 6152155 2090391 TCP Actuated 24 110 6151382 2089893 Stop 24 TCP 111 6149546 2096540 Uncontrolled 24 114 6149434 2095155 TCP Actuated 24 117 6149184 2095010 Stop 24 119 6148428 2098392 TCP Actuated 20 120 6146612 2101964 TCP Actuated 20 121 6143253 2106196 TCP Actuated 20 123 6140622 2108667 TCP Actuated 19 126 6133125 2113858 TCP Actuated 17 TCP 127 6132926 2113689 Uncontrolled 17 130 6129314 2116827 Actuated 17 131 6128488 2116173 Actuated 16 136 6130929 2124166 TCP Actuated 12 138 6132624 2129428 TCP Actuated 12 139 6133476 2129759 TCP Actuated 12 140 6130429 2135944 TCP Actuated 12 141 6130658 2136001 TCP Actuated 12 143 6129897 2135802 Actuated 12 144 6128984 2135754 TCP Actuated 11 146 6128366 2145653 Actuated 7 147 6128756 2145615 Actuated 7 148 6127887 2145625 Actuated 7 151 6128764 2150329 Actuated 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K132 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 152 6128510 2150145 Actuated 7 155 6128006 2149941 Actuated 7 157 6129383 2157605 Actuated 3 163 6127862 2157739 Actuated 2 164 6144205 2135411 Actuated 13 166 6142228 2135197 Actuated 12 177 6134489 2130693 TCP Actuated 12 187 6142171 2142905 Actuated 8 188 6141511 2144736 Actuated 8 190 6141415 2147063 Actuated 8 191 6141130 2148634 Actuated 8 193 6141104 2150172 Actuated 8 195 6141669 2152038 Actuated 3 196 6141608 2152840 Actuated 3 199 6140330 2155440 Actuated 3 237 6166852 2150973 Actuated 5 255 6124160 2115558 Actuated 16 256 6123300 2115851 TCP Actuated 16 257 6122417 2116125 Actuated 16 258 6121318 2116452 Actuated 16 260 6120073 2116661 TCP Actuated 16 261 6119379 2116545 Actuated 16 262 6118771 2116423 Actuated 16 263 6117215 2116085 Actuated 16 264 6118767 2116069 Actuated 16 265 6119388 2116085 Actuated 16 266 6120299 2116066 TCP Actuated 16 267 6116704 2116160 Actuated 15 269 6115492 2118007 Actuated 15 270 6114447 2119888 Actuated 15 272 6111313 2123959 TCP Actuated 15 273 6109017 2126110 Actuated 10 275 6107375 2128168 Actuated 10 276 6106836 2128658 Actuated 10 277 6106189 2129594 Actuated 10 278 6105478 2130655 Actuated 10 281 6111717 2124141 Stop 10 283 6112885 2124450 Actuated 10 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K133 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 285 6113478 2126813 TCP Actuated 10 291 6113850 2133213 Actuated 10 294 6116309 2138239 Actuated 6 296 6118135 2139790 Actuated 7 298 6120242 2141727 Actuated 7 300 6122353 2144208 Actuated 7 304 6124343 2147970 Actuated 7 306 6124442 2149988 Actuated 7 308 6126348 2149259 Actuated 7 310 6120397 2125370 TCP Actuated 11 313 6121102 2125000 Actuated 11 317 6124898 2123870 TCP Actuated 16 319 6126208 2125986 Actuated 11 323 6127327 2127230 Actuated 11 324 6127873 2127965 Actuated 11 328 6131034 2127732 TCP Actuated 12 329 6131056 2129087 TCP Actuated 12 330 6131784 2129120 TCP Actuated 12 331 6131526 2127755 Actuated 12 335 6118735 2125235 Actuated 11 338 6116210 2124899 TCP Actuated 10 341 6114437 2126731 Actuated 10 344 6120849 2126190 Actuated 11 346 6121828 2128628 Actuated 11 348 6122432 2129947 Actuated 11 350 6124545 2131491 Actuated 11 352 6125219 2134324 Actuated 11 355 6124717 2135163 Actuated 11 357 6124140 2136607 Actuated 11 361 6124171 2142344 Actuated 7 366 6116842 2125858 Actuated 10 368 6116328 2127330 Actuated 10 372 6117139 2130101 Actuated 11 373 6117266 2131746 Actuated 11 375 6117928 2134481 Actuated 11 376 6118238 2135506 Actuated 11 377 6117450 2136741 Actuated 11 381 6120206 2124746 Actuated 11 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K134 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 383 6120250 2119986 Actuated 16 384 6120152 2118718 Actuated 16 385 6120093 2117349 Actuated 16 390 6124126 2121936 Actuated 16 393 6124100 2119637 Actuated 16 400 6115179 2122437 Actuated 15 402 6115372 2121124 Actuated 15 404 6122109 2119921 Actuated 16 405 6122522 2120005 Actuated 16 407 6116684 2120697 Stop 15 409 6117826 2118740 Stop 16 411 6121695 2118732 Stop 16 414 6122212 2137096 Actuated 11 416 6119564 2135757 Actuated 11 418 6124240 2137574 Actuated 11 431 6112415 2136117 Stop 10 432 6114750 2138110 Actuated 6 434 6115293 2137206 Actuated 10 435 6113667 2137885 Actuated 6 437 6115086 2139351 Actuated 6 441 6115549 2141663 Actuated 6 443 6115331 2143961 Actuated 6 450 6119148 2142924 Actuated 7 454 6118904 2145741 Stop 7 457 6124618 2143544 Actuated 7 460 6126304 2146219 Actuated 7 462 6127417 2145829 Actuated 7 465 6127721 2146406 Actuated 7 466 6127716 2145655 Actuated 7 467 6126292 2146978 Stop 7 471 6127123 2152548 Actuated 2 472 6130272 2131297 Actuated 12 473 6129315 2133905 Actuated 12 475 6129183 2150890 Actuated 3 476 6129795 2151298 Actuated 3 477 6130857 2151716 Actuated 3 478 6131465 2151723 Actuated 3 479 6132734 2151491 Actuated 3 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K135 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 481 6135684 2151395 Actuated 3 482 6137100 2152102 Actuated 3 486 6140772 2152441 Actuated 3 487 6132826 2130649 Actuated 12 488 6132280 2131700 Actuated 12 494 6129949 2137250 Stop 12 495 6129648 2138032 Stop 8 498 6128093 2139617 Actuated 7 500 6127698 2141238 Stop 7 502 6128107 2143865 Actuated 7 505 6128519 2145115 Actuated 7 506 6128880 2146390 Actuated 7 507 6128797 2147194 Actuated 7 508 6128937 2148090 Actuated 7 509 6129151 2148538 Actuated 8 510 6129591 2149024 Actuated 8 511 6130933 2149482 Actuated 8 512 6131629 2149561 Actuated 8 514 6132610 2150667 Actuated 3 528 6147878 2098713 TCP Actuated 20 530 6147025 2100039 Actuated 20 532 6146262 2101466 TCP Actuated 20 533 6145062 2102698 Actuated 20 534 6144287 2102853 Actuated 20 536 6143390 2103102 Actuated 20 539 6141388 2103717 Actuated 19 541 6140260 2103866 TCP Actuated 19 542 6139824 2103863 Actuated 19 543 6136722 2106543 Actuated 19 544 6136091 2107097 TCP Actuated 19 548 6129215 2112354 TCP Actuated 17 549 6125896 2114885 Actuated 16 553 6150431 2093738 Actuated 24 555 6149751 2095345 Stop 24 556 6149510 2095999 TCP Actuated 24 557 6149624 2097041 Actuated 24 560 6126004 2115718 Actuated 16 561 6126401 2116269 Actuated 16 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K136 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 563 6126856 2118897 TCP Actuated 16 TCP 571 6130707 2125219 Uncontrolled 12 572 6130964 2125556 TCP Actuated 12 573 6130991 2126033 Actuated 12 575 6127754 2115170 Stop 16 580 6129043 2113779 Stop 16 581 6129051 2113383 Stop 16 645 6147232 2110508 Actuated 18 646 6147050 2109912 Actuated 20 648 6145717 2108009 Actuated 20 649 6141675 2110016 Actuated 17 651 6143268 2110970 Actuated 18 653 6144586 2112237 Actuated 18 655 6147618 2114372 Actuated 18 657 6148535 2115055 TCP Actuated 18 660 6149945 2115374 Actuated 18 661 6150702 2115241 Actuated 18 663 6152138 2114071 Actuated 18 664 6147791 2107543 Actuated 20 669 6151779 2111199 Actuated 18 671 6152404 2110309 Stop 18 680 6155124 2115749 Stop 18 688 6150980 2116151 Actuated 18 690 6150763 2118173 Actuated 18 691 6151083 2118679 Actuated 18 692 6153031 2119587 Actuated 18 694 6155212 2120393 Stop 18 695 6149114 2118017 Actuated 18 700 6147533 2116848 Actuated 18 701 6146954 2110865 Actuated 18 702 6146182 2111691 Actuated 18 703 6144329 2112989 Actuated 18 704 6144159 2113851 Actuated 18 706 6142900 2114484 Stop 18 708 6141492 2115837 Actuated 17 710 6139796 2117096 Actuated 17 711 6138946 2116603 Actuated 17 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K137 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 712 6137724 2115648 Actuated 17 715 6141144 2118691 Stop 17 727 6145895 2106286 Stop 20 733 6147931 2105081 Stop 20 740 6146771 2102312 Stop 20 748 6149872 2100050 Stop 20 753 6150779 2097334 Stop 24 754 6150161 2097568 Stop 24 755 6146324 2101695 TCP Actuated 20 761 6144337 2100496 Stop 20 763 6145088 2101354 Actuated 20 764 6145852 2101934 Actuated 20 769 6146078 2098911 Stop 20 771 6147155 2099723 Stop 20 774 6147193 2097905 Stop 20 775 6147155 2097048 Stop 24 778 6148382 2095510 Stop 24 795 6171350 2090510 Stop 25 812 6149189 2095833 TCP Actuated 24 813 6148616 2098339 Actuated 20 815 6146132 2101575 TCP Actuated 20 826 6136390 2146204 Yield 8 828 6136589 2148258 Yield 8 830 6136764 2149677 Actuated 8 831 6136958 2150280 Stop 8 837 6139062 2148292 Yield 8 838 6139521 2149459 Yield 8 839 6139393 2150372 Stop 8 841 6140114 2151887 Stop 3 852 6138114 2143387 Stop 8 857 6138606 2140543 Stop 8 871 6138048 2144826 Yield 8 872 6138119 2144702 Yield 8 873 6137995 2144643 Yield 8 874 6136672 2145621 Yield 8 880 6138669 2147180 Yield 8 887 6138719 2145579 Yield 8 910 6226067 2059936 Stop 31 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K138 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 911 6227895 2056950 Actuated 31 918 6192819 2055346 Stop 30 921 6226499 2054457 Actuated 31 922 6222274 2051927 Actuated 31 930 6213432 2030225 Actuated 36 933 6213487 2024033 Actuated 36 939 6223745 2052676 Actuated 31 940 6227287 2055577 Actuated 31 950 6203804 2039070 Stop 33 959 6208951 2036600 Actuated 34 960 6207681 2038458 Actuated 33 963 6212442 2027953 Actuated 36 968 6214517 2025847 Stop 36 969 6215515 2026323 Stop 36 970 6216038 2026550 Stop 36 973 6152274 2121339 Stop 18 980 6155146 2121502 Stop 18 995 6114846 2145903 Actuated 6 996 6114498 2148843 Actuated 6 1002 6119313 2156247 Actuated 2 1005 6116894 2148821 Actuated 6 1006 6119934 2149313 Actuated 7 1007 6119304 2152189 Actuated 2 1009 6119705 2153205 Actuated 2 1010 6119920 2154995 Actuated 2 1011 6118557 2155913 Actuated 2 1013 6117553 2151690 Actuated 2 1014 6117655 2153862 Actuated 2 1015 6115213 2151386 Actuated 1 1016 6115415 2153022 Actuated 1 1017 6115681 2154551 Actuated 1 1021 6112933 2154437 Actuated 1 1022 6112852 2153006 Actuated 1 1023 6127820 2154754 Actuated 2 1025 6132351 2159023 Actuated 3 1028 6136709 2160657 Actuated 3 1029 6141199 2158633 Actuated 3 1030 6147131 2159723 Actuated 4 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K139 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 1031 6147845 2160110 Actuated 4 1033 6143316 2159780 Actuated 4 1038 6132764 2155050 Actuated 3 1042 6122964 2155593 Actuated 2 1044 6125505 2157619 Actuated 2 1045 6135805 2160280 Actuated 3 1047 6137429 2160554 Actuated 3 1048 6113329 2157495 Actuated 1 1049 6112938 2156596 Actuated 1 1051 6120016 2153941 Actuated 2 1066 6214420 2021877 Stop 36 1069 6213357 2022074 Stop 36 588 6131233 2111333 Stop 17 589 6132130 2112464 Actuated 17 590 6132680 2113272 Actuated 17 593 6133537 2109839 Actuated 19 598 6136422 2107617 Actuated 19 599 6136717 2107743 Actuated 19 605 6137043 2111756 Stop 17 606 6137360 2112440 Stop 17 607 6136569 2112945 Actuated 17 609 6135716 2112661 Actuated 17 610 6135109 2112847 Actuated 17 611 6134474 2113272 Actuated 17 612 6134149 2113673 Actuated 17 613 6133442 2113914 Actuated 17 614 6140553 2104575 Actuated 19 615 6141299 2104975 Actuated 19 616 6142265 2105242 Actuated 19 617 6142880 2105910 TCP Actuated 20 619 6144930 2107260 Actuated 20 623 6142866 2107260 Stop 20 1119 6236951 2054294 Actuated 32 1122 6237181 2055842 Actuated 32 1124 6237378 2057303 Actuated 32 1189 6145526 2103197 TCP Actuated 20 1196 6142600 2105529 Actuated 20 1201 6144614 2107002 Actuated 20 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K140 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 1212 6148765 2111759 Actuated 18 1221 6146531 2111491 Actuated 18 1225 6129964 2117008 TCP Actuated 17 1230 6129074 2115576 Stop 16 1231 6128651 2115159 Stop 16 1233 6127645 2114136 Stop 16 1235 6132462 2112950 Actuated 17 1250 6140123 2107882 TCP Actuated 19 TCP 1252 6140449 2108468 Uncontrolled 19 1271 6129692 2116361 Stop 17 1275 6136973 2107715 Stop 19 1286 6135657 2128818 TCP Actuated 12 1287 6131780 2125477 TCP Actuated 12 1290 6135297 2126139 Stop 12 1291 6136376 2126951 Actuated 12 1292 6137621 2129998 Stop 12 1293 6139145 2130988 Stop 12 1300 6154152 2156272 Stop 4 626 6141044 2108944 Actuated 19 632 6138043 2110618 Yield 17 636 6137496 2111672 Stop 17 637 6157231 2112143 Stop 21 639 6155676 2112343 Actuated 21 640 6153800 2113234 Actuated 18 641 6152325 2113260 Actuated 18 642 6150381 2112621 Actuated 18 643 6149706 2112249 TCP Actuated 18 644 6148045 2111316 Actuated 18 1083 6214434 2029656 Stop 36 1088 6231718 2060029 Actuated 31 1089 6233139 2062077 Actuated 31 1091 6237621 2061959 Actuated 32 1092 6238145 2061181 Actuated 32 1093 6237753 2058957 Actuated 32 1703 6147761 2109930 Actuated 18 1707 6125185 2115147 Actuated 16 1709 6125345 2115072 Stop 16 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K141 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 1137 6203246 2039310 Actuated 33 1141 6197723 2050544 Stop 30 1146 6157621 2084801 Actuated 25 1149 6164127 2080327 Actuated 25 1160 6160583 2082342 Stop 25 1162 6150411 2092689 Actuated 24 1164 6150095 2093603 Stop 24 1167 6147746 2098480 Stop 20 1175 6146735 2102152 Stop 20 1181 6145484 2101012 Stop 20 1185 6145130 2102904 Actuated 20 1317 6118782 2117350 Yield 16 1318 6121335 2117336 Stop 16 1321 6119036 2120030 Actuated 16 1322 6117817 2117367 Stop 16 1323 6117596 2118740 Stop 16 1324 6123925 2116751 Actuated 16 1327 6123534 2119887 Actuated 16 1332 6124058 2120925 Actuated 16 1334 6127926 2123763 Stop 16 1336 6126283 2123833 Actuated 16 1338 6128093 2125128 Actuated 11 1340 6129768 2127652 TCP Actuated 12 1343 6128403 2121696 Actuated 16 1347 6131063 2127275 Actuated 12 1349 6130190 2127645 Actuated 12 1352 6131075 2128876 Actuated 12 1354 6131314 2129115 Actuated 12 1357 6132111 2129279 TCP Actuated 12 1365 6130454 2150257 Actuated 8 1436 6146551 2159486 Actuated 4 1438 6142135 2158797 Actuated 3 1445 6133827 2159612 Actuated 3 1448 6133116 2159475 Actuated 3 1458 6127149 2149578 Actuated 7 1464 6124113 2148712 Actuated 7 1465 6120711 2147020 Actuated 7 1466 6121064 2145483 Actuated 7 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K142 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 1469 6121421 2143128 Actuated 7 1470 6120793 2142328 Actuated 7 1474 6123306 2148562 Actuated 7 1478 6124349 2149508 Actuated 7 1480 6118363 2154255 Actuated 2 1484 6118885 2151030 Actuated 2 1485 6116523 2151624 Actuated 1 1486 6116506 2154061 Actuated 1 1488 6116102 2148854 Actuated 6 1490 6118445 2148844 Actuated 7 1492 6116134 2155421 Actuated 1 1303 6152641 2157843 Actuated 4 1304 6153222 2155074 Stop 4 1307 6121395 2114938 Actuated 16 1308 6122889 2115385 Actuated 16 1380 6129522 2145181 Actuated 8 1391 6129469 2135729 Actuated 12 1396 6130741 2130149 Actuated 12 1397 6135200 2129575 Stop 12 1414 6134016 2128802 Actuated 12 1429 6133692 2151313 Actuated 3 1432 6151459 2160332 Actuated 4 1497 6114052 2158412 Actuated 1 1498 6117855 2155081 Actuated 2 1508 6119990 2154148 Actuated 2 1510 6112956 2155504 Actuated 1 1512 6112322 2152029 Actuated 1 1513 6112160 2150333 Actuated 6 1514 6112756 2149548 Actuated 6 1515 6113562 2148998 Actuated 6 1520 6112074 2150977 Actuated 1 1525 6113762 2154775 Actuated 1 1527 6115287 2152315 Actuated 1 1530 6117645 2153002 Actuated 2 1534 6114815 2150264 Actuated 6 1537 6123780 2142800 Actuated 7 1547 6114955 2136859 Actuated 10 1551 6115958 2132514 Stop 10 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K143 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

X Y Grid Coordinate Coordinate Control Map Node (ft)1 (ft)1 Type Number 1553 6115555 2138968 Actuated 6 1555 6117290 2139278 Actuated 7 1559 6119482 2140959 Actuated 7 1570 6123420 2137585 Actuated 11 1573 6124356 2139232 Actuated 7 1589 6115433 2125490 Actuated 10 1596 6115879 2123916 Actuated 15 1598 6115007 2120271 Actuated 15 1601 6119860 2125489 Actuated 11 1606 6120265 2123109 Stop 16 1608 6120274 2122767 Stop 16 1610 6120299 2121024 Actuated 16 1616 6129094 2127784 Actuated 12 1631 6118291 2119236 Stop 16 1645 6111901 2123330 Actuated 15 1649 6111225 2124552 Stop 10 1663 6126867 2117392 Actuated 16 1676 6158803 2086993 Actuated 25 1686 6214342 2029752 Yield 36 1

Coordinates are in the North American Datum of 1983 California VI Plane Zone San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station K144 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX L PAZ Boundaries

L. PAZ BOUNDARIES PAZ 1: A circle, two miles in radius, around the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. It extends beyond two miles in some areas to encompass the San Onofre State Beach, San Onofre Bluffs Campground and MCB.

PAZ 2: A 120 degree wedge of the Pacific Ocean offshore from the plant. This area has no permanent population.

PAZ 3: An area roughly south and southeast of the plant. This area is completely controlled by MCB.

PAZ 4: A wedge to the north of the plant. This zone includes the entire city of San Clemente, a portion of MCB and the unincorporated area of Orange County south of Ortega Highway.

PAZ 5: Includes the cities of Dana Point and San Juan Capistrano.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station L1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX M Evacuation Sensitivity Studies

M. EVACUATION SENSITIVITY STUDIES This appendix presents the results of a series of sensitivity analyses. These analyses are designed to identify the sensitivity of the ETE to changes in some base evacuation conditions.

M.1 Effect of Changes in Trip Generation Times A sensitivity study was performed to determine whether changes in the estimated trip generation time have an effect on the ETE for the entire EPZ. Specifically, if the tail of the mobilization distribution were truncated (i.e., if those who responded most slowly to the Advisory to Evacuate, could be persuaded to respond much more rapidly), how would the ETE be affected? The case considered was Scenario 1, Region 3; a summer, midweek, midday, good weather evacuation of the entire EPZ. Table M1 presents the results of this study.

Table M1. Evacuation Time Estimates for Trip Generation Sensitivity Study Trip Evacuation Time Estimate for Entire EPZ Generation Period 90th Percentile 100th Percentile 3 Hours 4:45 7:00 4 Hours 4:50 7:00 5 Hours (Base) 4:50 7:00 As discussed in Section 7.3, traffic congestion persists within the EPZ for about 61/2 hours. As such, the ETE for the 100th percentile are not affected by the trip generation time, but by the time needed to clear the congestion within the EPZ. The 90th percentile ETE are also not sensitive to truncating the tail of the mobilization time distribution.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station M1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

M.2 Effect of Changes in the Number of People in the Shadow Region Who Relocate A sensitivity study was conducted to determine the effect on ETE of changes in the percentage of people who decide to relocate from the Shadow Region. The case considered was Scenario 1, Region 3; a summer, midweek, midday, good weather evacuation for the entire EPZ. The movement of people in the Shadow Region has the potential to impede vehicles evacuating from an Evacuation Region within the EPZ. Refer to Sections 3.2 and 7.1 for additional information on population within the Shadow Region.

Table M2 presents the evacuation time estimates for each of the cases considered. The results show that the ETE is not impacted by reducing the shadow to 0%. Tripling the shadow evacuation from 20% to 60% results in no change to the 90th percentile ETE and increases the 100th percentile ETE by 10 minutes, not a significant change. As discussed in Section 7.3, ETE is dictated by congestion within San Clemente and is not significantly impacted by shadow evacuees. Decreasing the shadow percentage to 16 percent, reflecting the telephone survey results presented in Appendix F, does not have an impact on ETE.

Table M2. Evacuation Time Estimates for Shadow Sensitivity Study Evacuating Evacuation Time Estimate for Entire EPZ Percent Shadow Shadow Evacuation Vehicles 90th Percentile 100th Percentile 0 0 4:50 7:00 16 11,742 4:50 7:00 20 (Base) 14,677 4:50 7:00 60 44,031 4:50 7:10 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station M2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

M.3 Effect of Changes in EPZ Resident Population A sensitivity study was conducted to determine the effect on ETE of changes in the resident population within the study area (EPZ plus Shadow Region). As population in the study area changes over time, the time required to evacuate the public may increase, decrease, or remain the same. Since the ETE is related to the demand to capacity ratio present within the study area, changes in population will cause the demand side of the equation to change. The sensitivity study was conducted using the following planning assumptions:

1. The percent increase in population within the study area was varied between 5% and 8%. Increases in population were applied to permanent residents only (as per federal guidance) in both the EPZ area and in the Shadow Region.

2. The transportation infrastructure remained fixed; the presence of new roads or highway capacity improvements was not considered.

3. The study was performed for the 2Mile Region (R01), the 5Mile Region (R02) and the entire EPZ (R03).

4. The good weather scenario which yielded the highest ETE values was selected as the case to be considered in this sensitivity study (Scenario 1).

Table M3 presents the results of the sensitivity study.Section IV of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, and NUREG/CR7002, Section 5.4, require licensees to provide an updated ETE analysis to the NRC when a population increase within the EPZ causes ETE values (for the 2Mile Region, 5 Mile Region or entire EPZ) to increase by 25 percent or 30 minutes, whichever is less. Note that all of the base ETE values are greater than 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> with the exception of the 2mile region at the 90th percentile. Twentyfive percent of ETE values greater than 2:00 is always greater than 30 minutes. Therefore, 30 minutes is the lesser and is the criterion for updating. Twentyfive percent of the 90th percentile ETE for the 2mile region (1:35) is 23 minutes, which is less than 30 minutes.

Those percent population increases which result in ETE changes greater than 30 minutes, or 23 minutes for the 2mile region at the 90th percentile, are highlighted in red below - an 8%

increase in the EPZ population. SCE will have to estimate the EPZ population on an annual basis.

If the EPZ population increases by 8% or more an updated ETE analysis will be needed.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station M3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

Table M3. ETE Variation with Population Change Population Change Resident Base Population 7,668 9,968 12,269 th ETE for 90 Percentile Population Change Region Base 5% 6.5% 8%

2-Mile 1:35 1:40 1:40 1:40 5-MILE 5:10 5:25 5:25 5:30 FULL EPZ 4:50 5:05 5:05 5:10 th ETE for 100 Percentile Population Change Region Base 5% 6.5% 8%

2-Mile 5:00 5:00 5:00 5:00 5-MILE 6:50 7:05 7:15 7:20 FULL EPZ 7:00 7:20 7:25 7:30 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station M4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

APPENDIX N ETE Criteria Checklist

N. ETE CRITERIA CHECKLIST Table N1. ETE Review Criteria Checklist NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis 1.0 Introduction

a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area Yes Section 1 should be described.

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features Yes Figures 11, 31 of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.

c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be Yes Table 13 provided and includes similar information as identified in Table 11, ETE Comparison, of NUREG/CR7002.

1.1 Approach

a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained Yes Section 1.3 during the field survey of the roadway network should be provided.

b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities, Yes Sections 2.1, 3, 8 large employers, and special events should be identified.

c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control Yes Section 1.3, Section 2.3, Section 9, plans in the analysis. Appendix G

d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be Yes Section 1.3, Table 13, Appendix B, identified by name and version. Appendix C San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N1 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be Yes Section 3 - avoid double counting described. Section 5, Appendix F - 4.5% sampling error at 95% confidence interval for telephone survey 1.2 Assumptions

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption Yes Section 2.3 - Assumption 1 that the evacuation should be ordered promptly and no Section 5.1 early protective actions have been implemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 12, General Yes Sections 2.2, 2.3 Assumptions, of NUREG/CR7002 should be provided and include the basis to support their use.

1.3 Scenario Development

a. The ten scenarios in Table 13, Evacuation Scenarios, Yes Tables 21, 62 should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason should be provided for use of other scenarios.

1.3.1 Staged Evacuation

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in Yes Sections 5.4.2, 7.2 development of a staged evacuation.

1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas

a. A map of EPZ with emergency response planning areas Yes Figure 61 (ERPAs) should be included.

b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs Yes Tables 61, 77, H1 considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction in each sector.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N2 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

c. A table similar to Table 14, Evacuation Areas for a Staged Yes Table 61, 77, H1 Evacuation Keyhole, of NUREG/CR7002 should be provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations.

2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four Yes Permanent residents - Section 3 population groups, including permanent residents of the Employees and transients - Section 3, EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools. Appendix E Special facilities, schools - Section 8, Appendix E 2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. The US Census should be the source of the population Yes Section 3.1 values, or another credible source should be provided.

b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for Yes 2010 used as the base year for analysis.

growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE.

c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 21, Yes Figure 32 Population by Sector, of NUREG/CR7002, showing the population distribution for permanent residents.

2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles

a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 Yes 1.85 persons per vehicle based on or justification should be provided for other values. telephone survey results - see Table 13 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N3 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

b. Major employers should be listed. Yes Section 3.5 2.1.2 Transient Population

a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4, Appendix E should be included, and peak and average attendance for these facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided.

b. The average population during the season should be used, Yes Tables 34, 35 and Appendix E itemize the itemized and totaled for each scenario. transient population and employee estimates. These estimates are multiplied by the scenario specific percentages provided in Table 63 to estimate average transient population by scenario.

c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 facilities should be estimated.

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided. Yes Sections 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why values vary should be provided.

e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 21 Yes Figure 36 - transients of NUREG/CR7002, showing the population distribution Figure 38 - employees for the transient population.

2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents

a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit Yes Section 8.1, Table 81 dependent residents should be discussed.

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group Yes Section 8.1, Tables 85, 89 should be quantified.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N4 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent Yes Section 8.1 residents should be used in the analysis. Section 8.4 - page 87

d. The methodology used to determine the number of Yes Section 8.5 people with disabilities and those with access and functional needs who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of Yes Section 2.3 - Assumption 10 transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% Sections 3.6, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 should be used or justification should be provided for higher values.

f. An estimate of this population should be provided and Yes Table 81 - transit dependents information should be provided that the existing Section 8.5 - special needs registration programs were used in developing the estimate.

g. A summary table of the total number of buses, Yes Sections 8.3, 8.4 ambulances, or other transport needed to support Table 85 evacuation should be provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred.

2.3 Special Facility Residents

a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, Yes Section 8, Table 84 location, and average population should be provided. Appendix E, Table E3 Special facility staff should be included in the total special facility population.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N5 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility Yes Section 36, Section 8.3 data was obtained.

c. The number of wheelchair and bedbound individuals Yes Section 8.3, Table 84, Table E3 should be provided.

d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles Yes Section 8.3 needed to support the evacuation of the facility should be Tables 84, 85 provided.

e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g., Yes Sections 8.4 medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate.

2.4 Schools

a. A list of schools including name, location, student Yes Table 82, Tables E1, E2 population, and transportation resources required to Section 8.2 support the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided.

b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle Yes Section 8.2, Table 82 schools should be based on 100% of the school capacity.

c. The estimate of high school students who will use their Yes Section 8.2 personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis for the values used should be discussed.

d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary. Yes There are sufficient resources to evacuate schools in a single wave. However, Section 8.4 and Figure 81 discuss the potential for a multiple wave evacuation 2.5.1 Special Events San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N6 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

a. A complete list of special events should be provided and Yes Section 3.8 includes information on the population, estimated duration, and season of the event.

b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient Yes Section 3.8 population should be analyzed in the ETE.

c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event Yes Section 3.8 should be estimated.

2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for Yes Section 2.2 - Assumption 5 areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles Figures 21, 71 from the NPP.

Section 3.2

b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 Yes Section 3.2 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. Figure 34 Table 33

c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway Yes Section 5 - Table 58 network should be consistent with the trip generation time generated for the permanent resident population.

2.5.3 Background and Pass Through Traffic

a. The volume of background traffic and pass through traffic Yes Section 3.7 is based on the average daytime traffic. Values may be Section 6 reduced for nighttime scenarios.

Tables 36, 63, 64 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N7 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

b. Pass through traffic is assumed to have stopped entering Yes Section 2.3 - Assumption 5 (local law the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification. enforcement can man access control points at 30 minutes after initial notification).

Section 3.7 Table 63 2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the Yes Tables 37, 38 total populations and total vehicles used in analysis for permanent residents, transients, transit dependent residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and passthrough demand used in each scenario.

3.0 Roadway Capacity

a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be Yes Section 4 discussed.

3.1 Roadway Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been Yes Section 1.3 conducted.

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of Yes Section 1.3 the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the analysis.

c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, Roadway Yes Appendix K, Table K1 Characteristics, of NUREG/CR7002 should be provided.

d. Calculations for a representative roadway segment should Yes Section 4 be provided.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N8 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node Yes Appendix K, Figures K1 through K37 numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be present the entire linknode analysis provided and should be similar to Figure 31, Roadway network at a scale suitable to identify all Network Identifying Nodes and Segments, of NUREG/CR links and nodes 7002.

3.2 Capacity Analysis

a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for Yes Section 4 the transportation network should be described in detail and identifies factors that should be expressly used in the modeling.

b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information Yes Section 1.3, Section 4 should be used in the ETE calculation.

3.3 Intersection Control

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the Yes Appendix K, Table K2 total number of intersections modeled that are unsignalized, signalized, or manned by response personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections Yes Table J1 within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle length, and turn lane queue capacity.

c. Discussion should be provided on how signal cycle time is Yes Section 4.1, Appendix C used in the calculations.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N9 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis 3.4 Adverse Weather

a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and Yes Table 21, Section 2.3 - Assumption 9 the effects of adverse weather on mobilization time Mobilization time - Table 22 should be considered.

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Yes Table 22 - based on HCM 2010. The Table 31, Weather Capacity Factors, of NUREG/CR7002 factors provided in Table 31 of should be used or a basis should be provided for other NUREG/CR7002 are from HCM 2000.

values.

c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on Yes Not applicable.

streets and driveways, when applicable.

4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time

a. The process used to develop trip generation times should Yes Section 5 be identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the Yes Appendix F survey, area of survey, number of participants, and statistical relevance should be provided.

c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be Yes Appendix F summarized.

d. The trip generation time for each population group should Yes Section 5, Appendix F be developed from site specific information.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N10 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis 4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their Yes Section 5 discusses trip generation for homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. households with and without returning Trip generation time includes the assumption that a commuters. Table 63 presents the percentage of residents will need to return home prior to percentage of households with returning evacuating. commuters and the percentage of households either without returning commuters or with no commuters.

Appendix F presents the percent households who will await the return of commuters. Section 2.3, Assumption 3

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method Yes Section 5.4.3 used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients Yes Section 5, Figure 51 potentially returning to hotels prior to evacuating.

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during Yes Section 3.8 special events where a large number of transients should be expected should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population Yes Section 5, Table 59 should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network with the general public.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N11 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis 4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents

a. If available, existing plans and bus routes should be used Yes Section 8.4 - page 87. Preestablished bus in the ETE analysis. If new plans should be developed with routes do not exist. Basic bus routes were the ETE, they have been agreed upon by the responsible developed for the ETE analysis - see Figure authorities. 82 through 84, Table 89.

b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating Yes Sections 8.4, 8.5 ambulatory and nonambulatory residents.

c. The number, location, and availability of buses, and other Yes Section 8.4, Table 85 resources needed to support the demand estimation should be provided.

d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief Yes Section 8.4, Figure 81 drivers, and initiate the bus route should be provided.

e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit Yes Section 8.4, page 87 dependent residents to prepare and travel to a bus pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to the pickup point.

f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load Yes Section 8.4 passengers should be discussed.

g. A map of bus routes should be included. Yes Figure 82 through 84

h. The trip generation time for nonambulatory persons Yes Section 8.5, Table 814 includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time, and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N12 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

i. Information should be provided to supports analysis of Yes Section 8.4 return trips, if necessary. Figure 81 Tables 810 and 811 4.1.3 Special Facilities

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times Yes Sections 8.4, page 89 should be provided. Tables 812 and 813

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and Yes Sections 8.4 outbound speeds.

c. The number of wheelchair and bedbounds individuals Yes Section 8.4, Tables 84, 812 and 813 should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents should be discussed.

d. Time for loading of residents should be provided Yes Sections 8.4, Table2 812 and 813

e. Information should be provided that indicates whether Yes Sections 8.4 the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trips should be needed.

f. If return trips should be needed, the destination of Yes Sections 8.4 vehicles should be provided.

g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility Yes Sections 8.4 residents are expected to pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated to their final destination.

h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the Yes Sections 8.4 time elements for the return trips.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N13 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis 4.1.4 Schools

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization time Yes Section 8.4, page 86 should be provided.

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and Yes School bus routes are presented in Table outbound speeds. 86 School bus speeds are presented in Tables 87 and 88 Section 8.4 discusses inbound and outbound speeds

c. Time for loading of students should be provided. Yes Section 8.4 Tables 87 and 88

d. Information should be provided that indicates whether Yes Section 8.4, page 86 the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional trips are needed.

e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses Yes Return trips are not needed. Sufficient should be provided. resources to evacuate in single wave

f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion Yes Table 83. Students are evacuated to should be provided on whether students are expected to Reception & Decontamination Centers pass through the reception center prior to being where they will be picked up by parents or evacuated to their final destination. guardians San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N14 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the Yes Return trips are not needed. Tables 87 time elements for the return trips. and 88 provide time needed to arrive at reception center, which could be used to compute a second wave evacuation if necessary 4.2 ETE Modeling

a. General information about the model should be provided Yes DYNEV II (Ver. 4.0.11.0) System. Section and demonstrates its use in ETE studies. 1.3, Table 13, Appendix B, Appendix C

b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE No Not applicable as a traffic simulation calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate model was used the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input

a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative Yes Appendices B and C describe the set of model inputs should be provided. simulation model assumptions and algorithms Table J2 - model inputs

b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key Yes Appendix A performance measures and parameters used in the Tables C1, C2 analysis.

4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output

a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation Yes Appendix B model used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE should be provided.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N15 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided Yes 1. Table J5.

to support review: 2. Table J3.

1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit 3. Table J1.

node. 4. Table J3.

2. Network wide average travel time. 5. Figures J1 through J13 (one plot

3. Longest queue length for the 10 intersections with the for each scenario considered).

highest traffic volume. 6. Table J4. Network wide average

4. Total vehicles exiting the network. speed also provided in Table J3.

5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various Yes Figures 73 through 79 times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service (LOS) E and LOS F conditions, if they occur.

4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public

a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and Yes Tables 71, 72 100% of the total permanent resident and transient population San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N16 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis

b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all Yes Section 5.4 - truncating survey data to members of the general public. Any reductions or eliminate statistical outliers truncated data should be explained. Table 72 - 100th percentile ETE for general population

c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs Yes Tables 73 through 76 similar to Table 43, ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole, of NUREG/CR7002.

d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of Yes Sections 8.4 through 8.6 special facilities, transit dependent, and school Tables 87 and 88, 810 through 814 populations.

5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans

a. Information that responsible authorities have approved Yes Section 9, Appendix G the traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided.

b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic Yes Section 9, Appendix G control plan that affect the ETE should be provided.

5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time

a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation Yes Section 13, Appendix M time should be provided.

b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of Yes Results of the ETE study were formally enhancements to local authorities should be provided. presented to local authorities at the final project meeting. Recommended enhancements were discussed.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N17 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

NRC Review Criteria Criterion Addressed Comments in ETE Analysis 5.3 State and Local Review

a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction Yes Table 11 with these agencies should be discussed.

b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues Yes There are no unresolved issues. All issues that may affect the ETE. raised by stakeholders at both the project kickoff meetings and the final meeting have been addressed and incorporated in this final report.

5.4 Reviews and Updates

a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required Yes Appendix M, Section M.3 to be performed and submitted to the NRC.

5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center

a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers Yes Figure 101 should be provided.

b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate Yes Section 8.4 discusses a multiwave return times for buses should be provided. evacuation procedure. Figure 81

c. It should be clearly stated if it is assumed that passengers Yes Section 2.3 - Assumption 7h are left at the reception center and are taken by separate Section 10 buses to the congregate care center.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station N18 KLD Engineering, P.C.

Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1