ML12342A129

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
MPR-3801, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Revision 1, Part 10 of 13
ML12342A129
Person / Time
Site: Limerick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/06/2012
From: Schlaseman C S
Exelon Generation Co, MPR Associates
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RS-12-171 MPR-3801, Rev 1
Download: ML12342A129 (39)
v • d • e


Text

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: MN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

PV-S';--.FOOIA Equip. Class,2 (0L) i'.10IAr Opoc Volve Equipment Description -A ro Soraiy Pirmp %A4n PC-IV Location:

Bldg. _ Floor El. 14:7 Room, Area Manufacturer, Mo t. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N*of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YP NO UE! N/A[!YKNF-] UE! N/AE!4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the aco? Y OU ,NA-Vlv -'- 1nchoom ý?AUf-r 4 NEU{!5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NEI UE N/A!yXiNEI UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrmnnnrJPnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-340 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. OV-S?. )FWooA Equip. Class'2 (00) M461- CQ VaIv.-.5 Equipment Description )L 5 pthm4o SVLAlO t , pCIV Interaction.

Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?-tio ov 1 hesods, 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX'NI" UDI N/AEJ Y>NQI UEJ N/AEJ YR NEI UI N/AFI YZNE UE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yg"NEI UO1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

MI/A Evaluated by:-4 Date: ("< C-4 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 flnrrPnnndnnrI.

Nn " RR.-19-171 C-341 Equipment ID: HV-52-2FO01A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rlnrrPqnnndp-nrP Nn

  • R.R-19-171 C-342 Equipment ID: HV-52-2FO01A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrg.nnnPtnrP.

Nn* R.R-19-171 C-343 Equipment ID: HV-52-2FO01A I Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rlnrrp.nnndtnrn'.p Nn " R5-19-171 C-344 Equipment ID: HV-52-2FO01A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrmnnndPnrP Nn

  • RR-1t-171 C-345 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV-52-2F037 Equip. Class 1 2 (06) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description Core S&ray Isolation Valve WOV outboard of D eli)Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 295 Room, Area Room 593 Enclosure Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y4 NEI UE- N/AD Y.X NEI UQI N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in cloncrete nerthe anchors? YXNE]-Volvce -"5 1>ine -m1Ou'4' '0V 0 fD14 4 oV~Ckc60 1O5# e , oppat 4 cw" r7e"v ov UE' N/AD-ION 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NEI UI N/Ag YXK NEI U0 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.>Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1.nrrP-nnncP.nrP.

Nn -RR- 9-171 C-346 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. HV-52-2F037 Equip. Class 1 2 (06) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description Core S&ray Isolation Valve (MOV outboard of Qrvwell)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block wilsp not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

604 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y4NO UO N/AO YX NE U- N/AO deemwu ceI C6oc YKNEJ UO N/AO Y*NO UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? P1,47 f r nor -ALA, ~-6 -Poo Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al/A Evaluated by: 0ýM Qw'Jacn Date: 1/1'A)t< C-4 A>Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrn=qnnndPnrP.

Nn -RR-19-171 C-347 Equipment ID: HV-52-F037 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrP.-nnndPnr.p Nn -RR-19-171 C-348 Equipment ID: HV-52-F037 I Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rlnrrp-nnnrl~nrp Nn* RS-19-171 C-349 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV-55:003 Equip. Class" 2 (06) Motor Operated Valve Equipment Description HPCI Steam Outboard Isolation Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 238 Room, Area Room 309- (A re '.)Enclosure Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO] NI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YDNEI UE" N/AD YX NO UQ N/AN YXJ NEI U9 N/AO YO- NEI UD N/Ak Y'NO U[J*12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrP~nnndHPnrP.

Nn

  • RR-1-171 C-350 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. HV-55-'W003 Equip. Class 1 2 (06) Motor Operated Valve Equipment Description HPCI Steam Outboard Isolation Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?,A/o 58-44 4&f 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?-Ao QWrk , 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?b'wcen k 4 I OA Sor Yk" NE UD N/AU Y)<NO U0 N/AD YJ NO UD N/AD YP NEI UO i+ýruýL.Yv6rn~k

.&Je 61IJA~tOn Other Adverse Conditions r" 4 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NEI U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Av/A (ýAw %C/Evaluated by t: NIP I -Date:-*-7/<( C-4 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrP~nnndPnrnP Nn -PR-19-171 C-351 Equipment ID: HV-55-2F003 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rlnrr.nnndlnrP.

Nn -RR-19-171 C-352 Equipment ID: HV-55-2F003 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 C-353 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrp-nnndpnr.p Nn -R0-19-171 Sheet I of 2 Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV-55-2F004 Equip. Class" 2 (06) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description CST to HPCI Isolation Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 177 Room, Area Room 180 Enclosure Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO NX YX NEI UD N/AD Yk NO UO N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y)Q NEI UE N/AD-oe -4 ]o.; -O-f0 4 OAAbrs -A CoA t eo rn ; " 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NEI UD N/As(NEI UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4(C-3 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 C.nrrpnnndtPnrP Nn* Rq-19-171 C-354 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. HV-55-2F004 Equip. Class" (06) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description CST to HPCI Isolation Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, :ceilingtiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

-No 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YJX NO UO N/AEJ Y)ý NEI UE- N/AO YP(ND UO N/Afl YA'NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y;4 NEI U'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NI A Evaluated by: C)jm" Date: ,/~< C-4 )0 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 ('nrrP.qnnndpnr.P.

Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-355 Equipment ID: HV-55-2F004 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrrp.nnndPnrA Nn
  • RR-19-171 C-356 Equipment ID: HV-55-2F004 I I Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 flnrrP-,nnnriP~nrýpNn-R!R-19-171 C-357 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: & N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV-55-2F041 Equip. Class 1 2 (06) Motor Operated Valve Equipment Description' HPCI Suction from Suppression Pool Location:

Bldg. ReactOr Floor El. 177 Room, Area Room 180 Enclosure Manufacturer, Model, .Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE YXNED Ur N/AE YJX NE UE- N/AEl 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yk NEI UE- N/AE'1 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NEI UE] NIA~1 X NE UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrPqnnniPdnrP Nn" RS-19-171 C-358 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. HV-55-2F041 Equip. Class 1 2 (06) Motor Operated Valve Equipment Description HPCI Suction from Suppression Pool Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?-No AvaJi 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NO UO N/AU YN NO UO N/AD YJKNO UD N/AU Y¥(NU un Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no.other seismic conditions that could NEI U[D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)"i/A Evaluated by: ... f Date:< C-4 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 (`nrrP.,nnndPnr-.

Nn

  • RR-12-171 C-359 Equipment ID: HV-55-2F041 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrPqnnndPnrP.

Nn ' RR-19-171 C-360 Equipment ID: HV-55-2F041 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrP.nnndPnrn.

Nn

  • RPS-12-171 C-361 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. HV-57-231 Equip. Class1 2 (05) Fluid (AiriHyd)

Valves Equipment Description Suppression Pool Purge Inboard PCIV Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El.' )PV7- ; Room, Area Room 376 (A " I Enclosure Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO NX 4. Is the anchorage free of vi ,valve )e YVNE U[" N/AD Y(NO U[I N/Al],Yo NO U.N/AIA YO NO UD N/AE YX NO UD do'-^-f 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

SC-3 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrr.nnnHP.nr.P-W Nn' RR-19-171 C-362 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. HV-57-231 Equip. Class 1 2 (05) Fluid (Air/Hyd)

Valves Equipment Description Suopression Pool Purge Inboard PCIV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft tag ts free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Afo .-1t 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YK N[ UD N/AU Yt NO UD N/AU YJR(ND UD N/AU VOMND UEJ Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al/OcOM 'frI 4'Evaluated by: A~2 Date: g 1 , 1--4-< C-4 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nnr RR-19-171 C-363 Equipment ID: HV-57-231 I Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrP.nnndpnrA Nn

  • R.-19-171 C-364 Equipment ID: HV-57-231 I Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrr~mnnnHPnrA Nn* RR-17-171 C-365 Equipment ID: HV-57-231 Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 CnrrPnnndrnr.P Nn
  • RR-91-171 C-366 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LSHL-20-222A Equip. Class 2 (17) Temperature Sensors/Local Instruments (Not on Racks)Equipment Description Diesel Generator Day Tank Hi /Low Level Location:

Bldg. Diese/ Floor'El.

217 Room, Area Room 3m6 Generator "3 A Enclosure Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorate 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for wTh an anchorage config ration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YDIN~SNEI X6NEI XND Ur N/AD UO N/AD U- N/AD YO NEI UE 19N UD Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.-KC-3 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rlnrrqnnnd1nr.P Nn -RR-19-171 C-367 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. LSHL-20-222A Equip. Class" 2 (17) Temperature Sensors/Local Instruments (Not on Racks)Equipment Description Diesel Generator Day Tank Hi /Low Level Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Afie &t.w ýYAND UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, y ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipmpent?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?'xf4.D UD N/AD YND UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could iND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: 5/A t Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrPmnnndPnr.P Nn" R5-19-171 C-368 Equipment ID: LSHL-20-222A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrfnnndfnrc-Nn -R.1-19-171 C-369 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: @) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LT-42-215A Equip. Class" 2 (16) Instruments on Racks Equipment Description Reactor Level Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 253 Room, Area Room 475W Enclosure Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

..Mtdc corras'!Or) n ýdnv I 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YX NEI YtK ND UD N/AU YZ NE UDJ N/AO YX NO Y; NE UO N/A[]UrO N/AU YANE UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-370 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. LT-42-215A Equip. Class" (16) Instruments on Racks Equipment Description Reactor Level Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YX NE UE" N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?,t40 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO UD N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YD[ NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'J[ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:--A AAA Date: C6A/vr)', Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 CnrrP~nnnrdPnr.

Nn-" R.-19-171 C-371 Equipment ID: LT-42-215A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 (TnrrPnnnrIPnr..

Nn -RR-1-171 C-372 Equipment ID: LT-42-215A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 CnrrP'-nnnHAnr.P.

Nn* RR-19-171 C-373 Equipment ID: LT-42-215A Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 rnrrPnnndPnr Nn ' RR-19-171 C-374 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LT-42-215B Equip. Class 1 2 (17) Temperature Sensors/Local Instruments (Not on Racks)Equipment Description Reactor Level Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 253 Room, Area Room 475E Enclosure Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YXNEJ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y) NEI U[] N/AD 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y§ N] UD N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y NEI UD N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y NEI UD N/AQ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

?,' l, I, a.. 0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YK NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 nrrrPqnnndnP.nn Nn -RR-1 -171 C-375 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. LT-42-215B Equip. Class 1 2 (17) Temperature Sensors/Local Instruments (Not on Racks)Equipment Description Reactor Level Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

-No ,{ Or~r 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NO UO N/AO-YVgNEI ULI N/AEl Y14 NEI UF- N/A[l Y NE UD[]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yj NEI UE1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Date: -<C-4>Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 Nn ý R.-19-171 C-376 Equipment ID: LT-42-215B Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 r.nrrmnnnPdnr.P Nn* RR-19-171 C-377 Equipment ID: LT-42-215B Limerick Generating Station Unit 2 MPR-3801, Revision 1 flnrrmnnndHnr.

Nn

  • RS-1-171 C-378
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12342A129&oldid=1363077"