ML12342A090
| ML12342A090 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 12/06/2012 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-II |
| To: | Southern Co |
| References | |
| Download: ML12342A090 (44) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-l Facility:
Hatch Date of Examination:
acilili NRC Examinations Developed by:
Writte I
Operating Test Written
/
Operating Test T
Chief r
Task Description (Reference)
Examiners Initials
-180 1.
Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)
X
-120 2.
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
X2cf
-120 3.
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
X
-120 4.
Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)
X 4
[-90]
[5.
Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)]
{-75}
6.
Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES 301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-Ps, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as X
applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)
{-70}
{7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility N/A licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}
{-45}
8.
Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, x
ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)
-30 9.
Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398?s) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202)
X
-14
X
-14
- 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review x
(C.2.h; C.3.f)
-14
- 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
X
-7
- 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor x /1 (C.2.i; C.3.h)
-7
- 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if>10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent X
(C.2.i;_Attachment 4;_ES-202,_C.2.e;_ES-204)
-7
- 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee x
(C.3.k)
-7
- 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to x
NRC examiners (C.3.i)
Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Frnat Facility:
E. I. HATCH 201 2-301 Date of Examination:
06-28-2012 to 06-28-2012 Initials Item Task Description a
b*
c#
1.
a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
4 R
b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I
Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
T T
c.
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
,.44
,t44 d.
Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
,44,4 2.
a.
Using Form ES-3d -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major Ai A114,v/
S transients.
/.
M b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the A4 T
applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and
/ i quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D.
!fl
íi4 3.
a.
Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W
among the safety functions as specified on the form
/
(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form AA IA T
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s) fV v4 J (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
b.
Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form j
4 UI 4
(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of yyi iJ/]_
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4.
a.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
J
,I...
E b.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
c.
Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
R d.
Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
48 11 L
e.
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
Ca JJ
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
HATCH 2012-301 Date of Examination:
06-18-2012 to 06-28-2012 Initials Item Task Description
a b*
c#
1.
a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
AJj w
R b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I
Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
T T
c.
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
V.A
d.
Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
/tJ/\\
2.
a.
Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major
,9j5 I
S transients.
M b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at ft 1.
A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the 4
T applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D.
3.
a Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W
among the safety functions as specified on the form I
(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form fiD PA (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
b.
Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form A
(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4.
a.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
/s1 Z..
E b.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
. L. L c.
Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
R d.
Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
L e.
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column C; chief examiner concurrence required.
Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of I
/ as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knodge I diçl not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) ofW/
4rom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME L?d/
- 2. 1D 6..
d//h2
- 7. Pt.
/
82& 4&riii 9.
rLk.__
- 10. %lt 11.
. t.)itL 12.
Rot
-iL
- 13. IL4lilie fflRi
- 14. ii.r A 15.
NOTES:
/
JOB TITLE /RESPONSIBILITY Lpr#roP i T D/ç s?Aj,t C I
5
-Tet 4 /47$4 iZ dL,LP+ 4-4 LjW t4Po
/s-s-er oPS S%ppaQT Spr 0
GNATURE (1) w_ (/
/)4l.ZF 4
/tZA-DATE SIG ATURE
)
DA E NOTE
(
vV iv rar J-ii-,z 7-.-/
-fl-t-i Q_
--/--Z ///
6/zcji-
/fz,/z
- /zi
- f. rz
4 J/_ //
.fr/,q7, i -2.-Il-
/ 7 1
ES-201, Page 27 of 28
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature.
I agree that will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my know)edge I d,Jd not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of41g4(/ILFrom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME 1.1ON, t /AiI/
2.
y71i-5 3.
Th-eo 3dcw
- 4..R-(
13rzpe4IL 5._
- 6. (A J.
I
- 7. T.
8.
(LLJ
9.
Wk p4,4cvS 1OfNfJ
- 11. iei;
.Qi (t1i 1 2.7pj%fl Pi1t. i-: ueF 13.fA4-,JDQW#G° 14.S7d /1.
15.LJ., ile.iso NOTES:
JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY S
Kc(
- cii, vAth.i%Th-a-T(r-L Ss5
,4f10
,r5 5ij-r v I IW--
fJ V sI1) /sRo SIGNATU (1)
A-
)3j 4
DATE SIGNATURE(2)
DATE NOTE
)zqi4!
_j-/:i/12 r* /L6 tIWb2 5!2(f(Z cofafii j /3 I
JQ?M 4
ç-z.4,i Pg-(A 1
/ zc-iz O ZgZØ,z o7-Z?L-i2q
-7 L
ES-201, Page 27 of 28
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.
Pre-Examination cD/1t-4 k/ia I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g. acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowldge I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of_/24LFrom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE 1)
DATE SIGNATUR,(2)
DATE NOTE
- 1. M
/,
A 3.
Po/S 2.
-,,v,vrj
-s
/FS 4.Jv 5. ni,ng2n$
g/PO /aA db.%_- -(L._-.-
- 5. W)Ake
/:
e.
,I
- 7. L.,o,J,aHS S iJc.,rO Lc
- 8. M-e.
(c--. /
- 9. %444/ 6A1fr 1
- 10. (rJS1t Yi,i 9
lsr 7//fZ.
11.
1) 12.jrI
_,w_
14
/,t/1S//eAj,/
13.
23L71L 14.)QH (3 P{A 15.3 Z NOTES:
ES-201, Page 27 of 28
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of of the date of my signature.
agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner, understand that am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowJedg, I djd not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of
.4z.From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE 1.
oq 5?;6ei 7
- Y A
/z,IL__
2/
_ 7ç 3.
I 4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
NOTES:
ES-201 Page 27 of 28
BaN, Anthony R.
From:
Davis, Monty R.
Sent:
Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:41 AM To:
Ball, Anthony R.
Subject:
RE: ES-201 NRC Exam Security Agreement
- Anthony, I did not aid or assist any of the students who took the NRC exam, I have been in total compliance with the security agreement.
Monty Davis From: Ball, Anthony R.
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:30 AM To: Davis, Monty R.
Subject:
RE: ES-201 NRC Exam Security Agreement Please respond back to me and tell me that you did NOT aid any of the students and I can attach this email to the security agreement and then I can sign you off.
Thanks for all your assistance Monty!
ab From: Davis, Monty R.
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:04 AM To: Ball, Anthony R.
Subject:
RE: ES-201 NRC Exam Security Agreement
- Anthony, I will not be back to work until Tuesday nightshift July 10th.
Please advise, Monty From: Ball, Anthony R.
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 8:05 AM To: White, Neal; Berry, William R.; Burns, R. L.; Westberry, James C.; Vaughn, D 1, Jr; Hunter, Kenneth E.; Mitchell, John C.; Lower, Rodger D., Jr.; Tanner, 1
Ball, Anthony R.
From:
Collins, Carl James Sent:
Thursday, June 28, 2012 3:26 PM To:
Ball, Anthony R.
Subject:
RE: ES-201 NRC Exam Security Agreement I did not aid any student Sent from my Samsung Mobile Ball, Anthony R. wrote:
- Jimmy, Please respond back to me and tell me that you did NOT aid any of the students and I can attach this email to the security agreement and then I can sign you off.
Thanks for all your assistance!
ab From: Collins, Carl James Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 8:32 AM To: Ball, Anthony R.
Subject:
Re: ES-201 NRC Exam Security Agreement I will not be onsite during this time Sent from my Samsung Mobile Ball, Anthony R. wrote:
Greetings, The HLT-07 NRC Exam is complete.
lAW NUREG 1021, I am again required to obtain your signature on ES-201, Security Agreement.
1
Rutan, Raymond Neil From:
Yang, Shenteng Ted Sent:
Friday, June 29, 2012 9:55 AM To:
Richter, John L.
Cc:
Rutan, Raymond Neil
Subject:
S. Ted Yangs statement on the post-exam agreement for HLT-7 hi, John and Ray Here is mt statement on the post-exam agreement for HLT-7 I,
S.
Ted Yang have not divulged any information as described below:
To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weeks of 6/18/2812 6/28/2812.
From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered this licensing examinations, expect as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
- Actually, I was out of country during this peorids.
- Thanks, S.
Ted Yang From: Richter, John L.
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2812 6:52 AM To: Yang, Shenteng Ted Cc:
- Rutan, Raymond Neil
Subject:
FW: Please contact Ted for me Ted, Please respond to Rays message below.
Email Ray back..
From: Rutan, Raymond Neil Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 4:24 PM To: Richter, John L.
Subject:
Please contact Ted for me Importance:
High
- John, 1
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 F,,,a/
Facility:
PLANT E. I. HATCH HLT 7 Date of Examination: 06/18/2012 Exam Level: RO l1 SRO-l U SRO-U U
Operating Test No.:
2012-301 Administrative Topic (see Type Describe activity to be performed Note)
Code*
Conduct of Operations M, R Ui
- Correct Reactor Water Level for high drywell Admin 2 temperatures. G2.1.35 (3.9 4.2) ALL Conduct of Operations M, R Determine if plant conditions allow a Quick Admin 3 Restart of a Recirculation Pump (15 mm).
G2.1.20 (4.3 4.2) RO ONLY Equipment Control N, R Review HPCI Pump Operability Surveillance (25 Admin 4 mm) G2.2.12 ALL Radiation Control D, R Given a set of exposure conditions, determine the Admin 5 minimum level of authorization required to allow a worker to perform work which will exceed administrative exposure limits. G2.3.4 (2.5 3.1)
ALL NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
- Type Codes & Criteria:
(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank ( 1)
(P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected)
ES-3d Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 F-ia /
Facility:
PLANT E. I. HATCH HLT 7 Date of Examination: 06/18/2012 Exam Level: RO D SRO-l SRO-U U
Operating Test No.:
2012-301 Administrative Topic (see Type Describe activity to be performed Note)
Code*
Conduct of Operations D R Verify Fuel Movements Admin 1
G2.1.35 (3.9) SRO ONLY Conduct of Operations M, R Ui
- Correct Reactor Water Level for high drywell Admin 2 temperatures. G2.1.35 (3.9 4.2) ALL Equipment Control N, R Review HPCI Pump Operability Surveillance (25 Admin 4 mm) G2.2.12 ALL Radiation Control D, R Given a set of exposure conditions, determine the Admin 5 minimum level of authorization required to allow a worker to perform work which will exceed administrative exposure limits. G2.3.4 (2.5 3.1)
ALL Emergency Procedures/Plan D, S, R Given Plant Conditions, Determine the Emergency, Admin 6 Classification and complete the ENN Form.
G2.4.29 (4.0) SRO ONLY NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
- Type Codes & Criteria:
(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank ( 1)
(P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected)
ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline ALL FINAL Form ES-301-2 Facility:
PLANT E. I. HATCH HLT 7 Date of Examination:
06/18/2012 Exam Level: RO I1 SRO-l l1 SRO-U D
Operating Test No.:
2012-301 Control Room Systems@ (8 for P0); (7 for SRO-l); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)
System / 1PM Title Type Code*
Safety Function SF-i CRJSIIVI 1 Withdraw control rods (Rod A, D, S Reactivity Uncouples) 201003A2.02 (3.7/3.8)
SF-2 CR/SIM 2 Place 2 RFPT in service already at D, S Reactor Water Level Control 2100 rpm for TC.
259001A4.02 (3.8/3.7)
SF-3 CR/SIM 3 Override and Open MSIVs in an D, S Reactor Pressure Control Emergency 239001A4.01 (4.2/4.0)
SF-4 CRJSIM 4 Reactor Pressure Control With EHC A, M, S Heat Removal From The Core Failure 206000A4.06 (4.3/4.3)
SF-5 CR/SIM 5 RHRILPCI: Containment Spray A, D, S Containment Integrity System Mode / Initiate Drywell spray with a valve 22600iA2.1 1 (3.0/3.0) failure SF-6 CR/SIM 64160 VAC / Transfer an Emergency D,
Electrical 4160 VAC F from Normal to Alternate Power 262001A4.01 (3.6/3.7)
Supply RO ONLY SF-8 CR/SIM 7 Crosstie RHRSW D, L, S Plant Service System 219000A2.15 (RO_3.3/SRO_3.4)
SF-9 CR/SIM 8 Using the Override Switches, Vent A, M, Radiation Release the Torus with the CAD System 295038EK1.02 (4.2/4.4)
In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U)
SF-i PLANT 1 SBLC / From Outside the Control A, D, L, R Reactivity Room, Inject Boron using the SBLC System with 211000A2.01 (3.5/3.8) failure of first pump to start ALL SF-6 PLANT 2 Emergency Generators / Locally close A, N, E Electrical output breaker by flashing field and lowering Hz 26400A3.04 (3.1/3.1) then raising to -60Hz ALL SF-8 PLANT 3 During a loss of air, isolate the Fire D, E, R Plant Service System Protection Sprinklers 286000A2. 10 (2.6/2.7)
ALL
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 F,iia/
Facility:
HATCH Date of Examination:
06-18-2012 Operating Test Number:
201 2-301 Initials
- 1. General Criteria a
b*
c#
a.
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with A,/
sampling requirements (e.g., 10CFR55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
b.
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered
,,f during this examination.
4J
-1.-
c.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.)
d.
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within
/fl acceptable limits.
1 L, e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
system response and other examiner cues
statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
criteria for successful completion of the task A
identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards 4-D (-1
restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable b.
Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301 -1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified
%j on those forms and Form ES-201 -2.
- 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form
,qg ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
11, - 4 Date YJo/ia o /2//?
c.
NRC Chief Examiner(#) jW d.
NRC Supervisor NOTE:
The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
a.
Author I
b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
(
3.
4.
Major transients (12)
,.r,3 £?cc.2f
/-/-,I I
i2i.i cL ililit j i3i.i3 ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 f,,,_ 1 Facility: E. I. HATCH Date of Exam: 06-18-2012 Scenario Numbers:
1 / 2 I 3! 4 Operating Test No.:201 2-301 QUALITATIVE ATIRIBUTES Initials
a b*
c#
1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out f) of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
r 41 £if a
2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew 42 e the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario
, j without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
ifl C..t-frj 5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain 4g
,1 complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
c_-t_.
7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
2 Cues are given.
8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
Ce.-
9.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that ijj2 /
functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
il-L 10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All A 4
,,.i
,i.J other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
,i) t4>.
11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the A A form along with the simulator scenarios).
kII Ct-i 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)
Actual Attributes 1 12/314 1.
Total malfunctions (58) 7
/
/ 7 / (7 4i 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (12)
I a /
/
AH Abnormal events (24) 3 5.
EOP5 entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions 7.
Critical tasks (23)
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 p,,
12.
Facility:
E. I. HATCH Date of Exam:
06-18-2012 Operating Test No.:2012-301 A
E Scenarios P
V 1
2 3
4 T
M P
E o
I L
N CREW CREW CREW CREW T
N POSmON PoSrrIoN POSmON POSmON A
I C
S A
B S
A B
S A
B S
A B
L u
A T
R T
0 R
T 0
R T
0 R
T 0
M*
N Y
0 C
P 0
C P
0 C
P 0
C P
T P
R IU E
RO RX 2
2 2
1 4110 X
NOR 11124111 SRO-l I/C 3
4,6 4,6 5,7 4,6 3,5 4,6 3,5 16 4
4 2
SRO-U MAJ 7,8 7,8 8
8 7
7 7
7 5
2 2
1 El TS NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0
2 2
RO RX 2
2 2
14 110 NOR 1
1 1
24 111 SRO-l I/C 3,4, 4,5, 3,4, 3,4, 16 4
4 2
X 5,6 6,7 5,6 5,6 SRO-U MAJ 7,8 8
7 7
5 2
2 1
TS 3,4 3,6 3,5 4,6 8
0 2
2 o-i NOR El I/C 442 SRO-U MAJ 2
2 1
TS 022 RO RX 110 oi NOR 111 El I/C 442 SRO-U MAJ 2
2 1
El TS 022 Instructions:
1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.
(*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 -for-i basis.
3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Cornpetencies Checklist Form ES-301 -6 I
Facility: Plant E. I. Hatch Date of Examination: 06/18/2012 Operating Test No.: 201 2-301 RO X
RO El RD El RD El SRO-l El SRO-l El SRO-I X
SRO-l El SRO-U El SRO-U El SRO-U El SRO-U El SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1234 Interpret/Diagnose All All All All Events and Conditions
Comply With and All All All All Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control All All All All Boards (2)
Communicate All All All All and Interact Demonstrate N/A N/A N/A N/A Supervisory Ability (3)
N/A N/A N/A Comply With and N/A Use Tech. Specs. (3) 1234 All All All All All All All All All All All All All All All All All All All All Notes:
(1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applIcant.
APPLI CANTS Competencies 3,4 3,6 3,5 4,6
ES-401, Rev. 9 BWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-1 Facility Hatch Date of Exam:
2012 RO KIA Category Points SRO-Only Points Tier Group
KKKIKKKAAAAGI A2 G*
Total 1
2 5
6 1
2 3
4
- LTotal
- = = = =
=
1.
i 3
20 3
4 7
Emergency&
2 r
IT i 7
1 2
3 Abnormal Plant
NIA L._.
N/A
Evolutions Tier Totals 6
27 4
6 10 1
32323232222 26 2
3 5
2.
2 111 11 121 12 0
1 2
3 Plant Systems T,erTotals
- 3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities 1
2 3
4 10 1
2 f1 Categories 3
3 2
2 1
2 J 2
2 1.
Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable K/A category are sampled within each tier ofthe RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., exceptfor one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the TierTotals in each K/A category shall not be less than two).
2.
The pointtotal for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table.
The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/-1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 poInts and the SRO-only exam must total 25 poInts.
3.
Systemslevolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to ES-WI, Attachment 2, for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate K/A statements.
4.
Selecttopics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.
5.
Absent a plant-specific priority, only those K/As having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.
6.
SelectSRO topics for Tiers I and 2 from the shaded systems and K/A categories.
7.
The generic (G) K/As in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2of the K/A Catalog, butthe topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system.
8.
On the following pages, enter the K/A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; iffuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter iton the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note
9.
For TierS, select topics from Section 2 of the K/A catalog, and enterthe K/A numbers, descriptions, IRs, and polnttotals (#) on Form ES-4014. UmitSRO selections to KlAsthatare linked to 10 CFR 55.43.
295001AK2.05 295003AK1.03 295004G2.4.1 1 295005AK3.06 295006AA1.O1 295016AA2.07 295018AK3.06 295019M2.02 295021G2.2.40 295023AA1.04 295024EA2.06 Partial or Complete Loss of Forced Core Flow Circulation/i & 4 Partial or Complete Loss of AC /6 Partial or Total Loss of DC Pwr /6 Main Turbine Generator TrIp 13 SCRAM I 1 Control Room Abandonment /7 Partial or Total Loss of CCW 18 Partial or Total Loss of Inst. Air /8 Loss of Shutdown Cooling /4 Refueling Ace Cooling Mode 18 High Drywell Pressure /5 3.2 2.9 4.0 3.3 4.2 3.2 3.3 3.6 3.4 3.4 4,1 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI ES4OI, REV 9 TIGI BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 3.6 1ThIE1LILILILILIE1LI 3.2 LILJLILIE1LIL1DLI 4.2 LILILILILILILILILILI LILI1LILILILILILILI 4.2 LILILILILILJLIL1LI LILILILILILILILILI 33 LILIIILILILILILILILI LILILILILILILILILI
LILILJLILILILILILILJ LILILILILILILILILI 4.1 LILILILILILILILILI LPCI loop select logic: Plant-Specific Under voltage/degraded voltage effects on electrical loads Knowledge of abnormal condition procedures.
Realignment of electrical distribution RPS Suppression chamber pressure Increasing cooling water flow to heat exchangers Status of safety-related instrument air system loads (see AK2.l -AK2.19)
Ability to apply technical specifications for a system.
Radiation monitoring equipment.
Suppression pool temperature Page 1 of 2 12/1/2011 2:56PM
ES-401, REV 9 TIGI BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Kl K2 K3 1(4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 295025(32.1.27 High Reactor Pressure /3 3.9 4
[] El C] C] C] El El El [] C] ]
Knowledge of system purpose and or function.
295026EK3.04 Suppression Pool High Water Temp. I 3.7 4.1 El El El El C] El C] El LI SBLC injection 5
295028EA1.03 High DryweH Temperature / 5 3.9 3.9 C] [] C] [] El [] ] C] El El []
Drywell cooling system 295030EK1.02 Low Suppression Pool Wtr Lvi /5 3.5 3.8 C] [] C] [] C] C] C] C] C] C]
Pump NPSH 295031 EA1.02 Reactor Low Water Level! 2 4.5 4.5 El C] C] El C] C]
C] El [] []
High pressure (feedwater) coolant injection: Plant-Specific 295037EK2.O1 SCRAM Condition Present and Power 4.2 4.3
[] Ii?] [1 C] El El C] C] C] El El RPS Above APRM Downscale or Unknown
/1 295038EK1.02 High Off-site Release Rate / 9 4.2 4.4 (J El El C] El El [] [] [] C] C]
Protection of the general public 600000AKI.02 Plant Fire On Site / 8 2.9 3.1
)) El El El El El C] El C] C] El Fire Fighting 700000AK2.07 3.6 3.7 Turbine I Generator control Generator Voltage and Electric Grid Distrurbancecs Page 2 of 2 121112011 2:56 PM
NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
Low Reactor Water Level /2 High Drywell Pressure IS High Suppression Pool Temp. 15 Inadvertent Cont, Isolation / 5 & 7 High Secondary Containment Area Temperature /5 Secondary Containment High Differential Pressure /5 High CTMT Hydrogen Conc. /5 TOPIC:
Recirculation system: Plant-Specific Knowledge of the specific bases for EOPs.
Suppression pool cooling Loss of drywelllcontainment cooling Affected systems so as to Isolate damaged portions....
Off-site release rate: Plant-Specific Operation of drywell vent ES-401, REV 9 KA 295009AA1.03 295010G2.4.18 29501 3AK2.O1 295O2K1.05 295032EA1.05 295035EA2.02 500000EK307 FORM ES4OI-1 RO 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.3 3.7 2.8 3.1 TIG2 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE PR K1K2K3K4K5K6A1A2ASA4G SRO 3.1 4.0 LJL1DEEEE1EE 3.6 3.9 4.1 3.7 Page I of 1 12/1/2011 2:56 PM
a 0
In LU a,
C)
CD C.,
0 o
IL.
C C
0 DI 0) 0 t
a 0.
E a,
a, E
)
=
E a
o C.)
E 0
a, In In a) 0.
o i
§.
a)
.2 C
0 0
0.
C.)
.2 In C.)
0 DI In U
-J c.
CD El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El
[J El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El El CD 0)
(0
N N
(N c)
C) c6 ci C,
c, 00)
(0 0)
(0 0
C)
0 C.,
C, 3-C.)
C.)
C.)
z0 C)z D
ii-
- g
.2 LL<
U)
..5 In w
Q-
-J
0 o
0 C.)
0 0
c
=
0.
.j 0.
0.
o Z
-J 0
0 LU N
CD (1
N In C.)
In 0
0
0 0
0 0
q 0
0 N
a) fl o
C0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
ILl 0
0 0
0
N 01 01 01 IN N
N N
N (4
(N
ES-401, REV 9 T2GI BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR 1(1 K2 K3 1(4 1(5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 215005A4.03 APRM I LPRM 3.2 3.3
[] [] [J [] Q [] Q []
?APRM back panel switches, meters and indicating lights 2170001(204 RCIC 2.6 2.6 Q
J El Gland seal compressor (vacuum pump) 2180001(1.04 ADS 3.9 4.2
{j [J J [J [] [J Q fl El El []
Drywell/containment pressure: Plant-Specific 223002K3.10 PClSlNuclearSteaniSupplyShutoff 2.9 3.1
[] [J
[] []
[1 []
[] []
Reactorwatercleanup 239002A3.02 SRVs 4.3 4.3 fl [] fl fl fl [] [J 1=] fj El El SRV operation on high reactor pressure 259002A4.07 Reactor Water Level Control 3.8 3.6 LI El El [] []
fl All individual component controllers when transferring from automatic to manual mode 261000A1.O1 SGTS 2.9 3.1 El Q Q [] Q Q fl [] [] []
System flow 2610001(3.02 SGTS 3.6 3.9 LI [] }
[]
[] [] []
Off-site release rate 262001G2.4.47 ACElectiical Distribution 4.2 4.2 El El LI El El El El El El LI Ability to diagnose and recognize trends in an accurate and timely manner utilizing the appropriate control room reference material.
262002A3.O1 UPS (AC/DC) 2.8 3.1 LI LI El El LI LI LI LI SI El El Transfer from preferred to alternate source 263000A2.02 DC Electrical DIstribution 2.6 2.9 El LI El El El LI El El El LI Loss of ventilation during charging Page2of3 1211/2011 2:56PM
ES-401, REV 9 T2GI BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Kl 1(2 K3 K4 K5 1(6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 2640001(4.08 EDGs 2.6 2.7 f] J [] [] [] [] fl Q Q Governor control 3000001(1.02 Instrument Air 2.7 2.8 Li LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI [1 Service air 300000K6.04 Instrument Air 2.6 2.5 LI LI LI [] []
Service air refusal valve 4000001(2.02 Component Cooling Water 2.9 2.9
[] ) fl LI LI LI LI [] LI [] []
CCW valves Page3of3 12/1/2011 2:56PM
ES-401, REV 9 T2G2 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR KI K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 201001K1.11 CR0 Hydrauflc 2.8 2.8 fl [] [] [] Cl El C] El El El Reactor water cleanup pumps: Plant-Specific 202001A1.02 Recirculation 3.4 3.4 El El U El El U El U] U] UI Jet pump flow 202002K3.03 Reclrculation Flow Control 3.3 El El El UI El LI Cl El El El Reactor water level 204000K4.Ol RWCU 2.5 2.5 El El El j El fl [] El El El El Pump protection 215002K6.04 RBM 2.8 3.0 El El El El El l] El UI El El U]
APRM reference channel: BWR-34,5 218000A4.O1 Nuclear Boiler Inst.
3.3 3.1 El El El El El El El El El El Recorders 223001A3.04 Primary CTMT and Aux.
4.2 4.3 El El El El El El El El i El El Containmentldrywell response during L.OCA 233000K2.02 Fuel Pool Cooling/Cleanup 2.8 2.9 U] ]1 UI El El El El El El El El RHR pumps 234000K5.02 Fuel Handling Equipment 3.1 3.7 El El El El El El El El El El Fuel handling equipment interlocks 241000A2.23 Reactor)Turbine Pressure Regulator 2.6 2.6 UI El El El El El El ]I El El El Turbine high eccentricity 268000A4.O1 Radwaste 3.4 3.6 El El El El El El El El El I El Sump integrators Page 1 of 2 12/1/2011 2:56 PM
ES-401, REV 9 T2G2 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR KI K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 286000G2.4.9 Fire Protection 3.8 4.2 El El El LI LI El El El El El tl Knowledge of low power I shutdown implications in accident (e.g. LOCA or loss of RHR) mitigation strategies.
Page 2 of 2 12/112011 2:56 PM
El El El El El El El El El El Knowledge of operator responsibilities during all modes of plant operation.
3.5 3.6 El El El El []El LID
[j Ability verify the controlled procedure copy.
3.8 4.8 El El El fl El El El [] El El Ability to manage the control room crew during plant transients.
3.1 4.6 El El El El [] [] El El Ability to track Technical Specification limiting conditions for operations.
3.6 4.6 El El El El El El El El El El []
Ability to determine operability andlor availability of safety related equipment 4.2 4.4 El El El El El El El El El El Ability to interpret control room indications to verify the status and operation of a system, and understand how operator actions and directives affect plant and System conditions 3.4 3.8 El El El El El El El El El El Knowledge of radiological safety procedures pertaining to licensed operator duties 3.4 3.8 El El El LI El El El El El LI Knowledge of radiation or contamination hazards that may arise during normal, abnormal, or emergency conditions or activities 3.1 3.6 El El El El El El El El El [I Knowledge of facility protection requirements including fire brigade and portable fire fighting equipment usage.
3.6 4.0 El El El El El El El El El El Knowledge of operator response to loss of all annunciators.
ES-401, REV 9 T3 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR KI 1(2 K3 K4 1(5 1(6 Al A2 A3 PA G TOPIC:
RO SRO G2.1.2 Conduct of operations 3
4 G2.1.21 G2.1.6 G2.2.23 G2.2.37 G2.2.44 Conduct of operations Conduct of operations Equipment Control Equipment Control Equipment Control G2.3.13 G2.3.14 G2.4.26 Radiation Control Radiation Control Emergency Procedures/Plans G2.4.32 Emergency Procedures/Plans Page 1 of I 121112011 2:56PM
SRO TIGI BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1K2K3K4K5K6A1A2A3A4G RO SRO 3.6 3.6 flDODLLJ1 4.6 4.6 DUUDLJLJDJLJDO 4.5 4.6 4.1 4.2 1E11fl 3.7 3.9 3.8 flU
[]UUUU 41 DUUDDDflflflEli1 FORM ES-401-1 ES-401, REV9 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
295OO5(2.2.4 Main Turb.e Generator Trip /3 295006AA2.05 SCRAM/i 295025G2.4.2 High Reactor Pressure / 3 i26EA2.o1 Suppression Pool High Water Temp. /5 295030EA2.03 Low Suppression Pool Wtr Ll 15 295031(32.4.20 Reactor Low Water Level /2 600000(32.2.12 Plant Fire On Site 18 TOPIC:
(mufti-unit) Ability to explain the variations in control board layouts, systems, Instrumentation and procedural actions between units atafacility.
Whether a reactor SCRAM has occurred Knowledge of system set points, interlocks and automatic actions associated with EOP entry conditions.
Suppression pool water temperature Reactor pressure Knowledge of operational implications of EOP warnings, cautions and notes.
Knowledge of surveillance procedures.
Page 1 of 1 12/1/2011 2:56 PM
295O332.4.49 High Secondary Containment Area Radiation Levels / 9 Ability to perform without reference to procedures those actions that require immediate operation of system components and controls.
ES-401, REV 9 SRO TIG2 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR 1(1 K2 1(3 K4 1(5 1(6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 29501 5G2.1.27 Incomplete SCRAM! 1 3.9 4
[]
[] [] [] []
[] [j Knowledge of system purpose and or function.
295022AA2.03 Loss of CRD Pumps Il 3.1 3.2 LI LI LI LI LI LI Li LI LI El CRD mechanism temperatures 4.6 4.4 DLIL1LlLILILILI Page 1 of I 12/1/2011 2:56 PM
ES-4O1, REV 9 SRO T2GI BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME! SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 203000G2.420 RHRILPCI: Injection Mode 3.8 4.3
[] []
[] [] [] [] [] []
Knowledge of operational implications of EOP warnings, cautions and notes.
215004G2.4.47 Source Range Monitor 4.2 4.2
[]
[]
[]
[]
Ability to diagnose and recognize trends in an accurate and timely manner utikzing the appropriate control room reference material.
215005A2.07 APRM / LPRM 3.2 3.4 El [] LI C] C] C]
LI [] []
Recirculation flow channels flow mismatch 261 000G2.2.37 SGTS 3.6 4.6
[] [] [] [} LI LI C] C] C] C]
Ability to determine operability and/or availability of safety related equipment 400000A2.O1 Component Cooling Water 3.3 3.4 C] C] C] C] C] C] [] gj []
C]
Loss of CCW pump Page 1 of I 12/112011 2:56 PM
FORM ES-401-1 TOPIC:
Ability to prioritize and interpret the significance of each annunciator or alarm.
Feedwater heater isolation Knowledge of surveillance procedures.
ES-401, REV 9 SRO T2G2 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR KI K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 23000002.4.45 RHR1LPCI: Torus/Pool Spray Mode 4.1 4.3 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI El LI I]
259001A2.02 Reactor Feedwater 3.1 3.3 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI ] LI LI LI 29000202.2.12 Reactor Vessel Internals 3.7 4.1 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI I Page 1 of I 12/1/2011 2:56 PM
ES-401, REV 9 SRO T3 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME! SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 02.1.25 Conduct of operations 3.9 4.2
[J [] []
[]
[] [] [] []
Ability to interpret reference materials such as graphs, monographs and tables which contain performance data.
02.2.42 Equipment Control 3.9 4.6
[] []
[] [] [] []
[] (
Ability to recognize system parameters that are entry-level conditions for Technical Specifications 02.2,43 Equipment Control 3.0 3.3 D Li Li LI LI Li Knowledge of the process used to track inoperable alarms 02.3.11 Radiation Control 3.8 4.3 Li Li [] [] J Ability to control radiation releases 02.3.13 Radiation Control 3.4 3.8 Li Li J [] Li
[] fl Li Knowledge of radiological safety procedures pertaining to licensed operator duties 02.4.23 Emergency Procedures/Plans 3.4 4.4 Li Li [I Li [] LI LI Li [] []
Knowledge of the bases for prioritizing emergency procedure implementation during emergency operations.
02.4.29 EmergencyProcedures/Plans 3.1 4.4 Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li [
Knowledgeoftheemergencyplan.
Page 1 of 1 121112011 2:56PM
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6
/
Facility:
Plant E. I. Katch Date of Exam: 06-28-2012 Exam Level: RO X SRO X Initial Item Description J?i_
1.
Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.
-c_
2.
a.
NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.
b.
Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.
3.
SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 4f.
4.
The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions j J were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office).
4 5.
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or
, A the examinations were developed independently; or
/i (4 te licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain) i.o
â o R,c O
6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from Bank Modified New the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or lj 9 y jc3/ 5 modified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only question
I.
/
distribution(s) at right.
/1 3
2
/f
{Ze 7.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory I
C/A exam are written at the comprehension! analysis level; I
the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly
,39-. /
[5 3 /
selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter
/
A the actual RO / SRO question distribution(s) at right.
D I /
1.4 / 3
8.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.
/7) 9.
Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are 46 e..,J justified.
10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.
k3 e_
11.
The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is 4/ 3ç correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note:
- The facility reviewe?s initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet -- Hatch June 2012 Exam Form ES-401-9 1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
8.
Q#
LOK LCD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues TIF Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-0=
SRO B/M/N UIE/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only Instructions
[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
1.
Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
2.
Enter the level of difficulty (LCD) of each question using a 1 5 (easy difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 4 range are acceptable).
3.
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
4.
Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content).
The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
5.
Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-only (K/A and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
6.
Enter question source: (B)ank, (M)odified, or (N)ew. Check that (M)odified questions meet criteria of ES-401 Section D.2.f.
7.
Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
8.
At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
8.
Q#
LOK LCD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F j Cred.
Partial Job-J Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Linkj units ward K/A Only 1
F N
S (OK)
WLLL Z1 iI0Fc J
N 5(0K) 4 F
X N
U K/A mismatch. Need better understanding of what task is to be performed and where it is performed.(changed to E licensee will revise question.
M C.)
C.)
0 c)
C.)
0 (0
a)
(CI
()
C.)
0 0)
I 71
-n i
Z 71 I
11 I
-n I
71 1
I i
-n 71 I
I 71 O-rO!
-CI x
3
,3 C
CD 0
0
0-0
-n C-)
pS?
_--------_--fr c
(
00 0
C CD D
0 w
0 0
-,0 a.
x
0(/)
D CD z0 z
z z
z z
z w
z z
z w
z 9) z C
(0 C
m co 0
Ca C
(0 Ca Ca 0
Ca C
0 Ca Ca (0
m 00 OCD 00 0)0
=
(flO(D3 o
_n CD
- Q_
)0 0
CD.
0,<0 CD CDCD 0
.r C,)
j5*
o
CD CD 0
0, 0
D CQCDCDo D
I Q.><
0
)
C,)
0)0 0
-I00
.g g
CØ)CD a
g a
00 0
CD CD
I 0
flli
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
8.
Q#
LOK LCD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A jOnly 24 H
F F
B S?
[This may be SRO only question. Need to evaluate. (Licensee I
I jsaid this is ok.
Question should be an S. 614/2012)
B 5(0K) 26 F
M E
The placement of the phrase lAW 34S0-N30-OO1 -2 implies that both responses are to be answered in accordance with the procedure, but from reading the supplied references the applicant isnt expected to apply any specific direction from the procedure to answer the second fill-in the-blank, which could cause some confusion. Move the phrase out of the question portion of the stem and place it at the front of the first fill-in-the-blank since its not the expectation that the applicant close the stop valves lAW the procedure.
Is it the expectation that the applicant know from memory which instrument is required by procedure to be used to measure eccentricity?
(Added comments as suggested. Licensee stated that they should know this form memory question is accepted 6/4/2012) 27 H
M S/E Distractors A & C
- Since this is an individual RFPT controller might be more plausible that some preset amount of speed bias is generated rather than a preset drop in the level setpoint might make the second part more plausible. Should discuss. (Accepted question without change. Should be an 5. 614/2012) 28HZZZZZ 30 H
B 5
Grammar remove apostrophe from the word its in the stem (made change 6/4/2012)
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
8.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only 31 F
M E
Consider: Choices A & B The stem is asking for the initial backup power to the Vital AC Bus.
1st part of these choices includes Vital AC in the response.
If an applicant didnt know; a good guess would be the responses containing the same terminology. Add via Vital AC Battery Charger to the end of choices C & D. This is accurate because the power can be supplied from the 600VAC D Bus via the battery chargers and the terminology is consistent with what appears in the Vital AC Electrical Lineup (34S0-R25-002-2).
This removes any obviouse clue provided by the use of Vital AC in only choices A & B.
(made change as suggested. 6/4/2012) 32 F
B S?
Is it an expectation that the operators should know the actions on pg. 4 of a six page abnormal operations procedure?(Licensee agreed that operators are not required to know this from memory.
Will revisit question...61412012..) Reviewed revised question OK Need to verify that there is not high temp trip in vendor manual. 615/2012 33 F
B U
Choices B & D Given the background of all the applicants (AUO qualified) the use of SYN INDICATOR AND SYNCHRONIZER are implausible. The exam item distractors have to be credible for the position (RO) being sought. Anyone with previous AUO qualification would know that the synchronizer would not be used to control the fuel supply to the EDG.
((wrote new question... acceptable 6/4/2012) 34 F
B S
Consider removing the word normally out of the stem. Is there any other integrator they would ever use for determining Unidentified Leakage?
((Removed word. 6/4/2012) 35 H
N 5
(OK) 36 H
N U
Distractors B and D a flow (2.OMlbm/hr) that corresponds to some unspecified lower power/speed doesnt seem a credible choice.
Choices A and C None of the supporting documentation supports that a final core flow value of 6.0 Mlbm/hr would occur at the stated power level (73%) and RR pump speed (70%).
(Used simulator to validate question and found it to be correct. However, wrote a new question and validated it on the simulator as well.
Question should not have been a U, but an E. Agreed with licensee. New question is acceptable.... 6/4/201 2)
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
8.
Q#
LOK LOD rr f (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. j Link!
unitsj ward K/A Only 37 H
X N
U K/A match is weak. The K/A is to test the operational implications of undervoltage/degraded voltage. The conditions provided in the stem of the question are not specific to an undervoltage/degraded voltage situation. The stem of the question doesnt have the applicant either recognize an undervoltage/degraded voltage condtion or make some determination how the system will respond to a given undervoltage/degraded voltage condition. The conditions that caused the response provided in the stem would also occur on a loss of power and is not specific to an undervoltage/degraded voltage condition. So no decision can be made about the applicants understanding of the operational implications of an under voltage/degraded voltage condition.
(Accepted question as written licensee explained why is matched the K/A used question as is. Should not be a U.
6/412012) fNS(OK) 39 F
N S
(OK) 40 F
M E
Distractor D The stem states a failure occurred
- I dont find it plausible that nothing happens. Since the intent of the question is to determine if the applicant knows the effect of removing the shorting links, consider reworking the stem of the question with an SRM with rising counts (above the trip point) and subsequently another SRM experiences an upscale failure. The choices can the revolve around whether a scram or half-scram occurred as a result of the first SRM reaching its trip point or once the second SRM failed.(Per the licensee if you stated SRM Shorting Links installed the answer would be D. Accepted distractor D.
Should have been an 5. 6/4/2012) 41 H
M 5
(OK) 42 H
N S
(OK)
[f(oK) 44 F
N S/?
Distractors C and D Dont understand why... a guage on the 87 elevation is plausible. Are there other instruments at this location that are used during Control Rm Abandonment? If not then the 2 half of these choices are not plausible. Question is OK. 6/4/2012
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
8.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F J Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO B/M/N UIEIS Explanation Focus Dist. j Link unitsj ward K/A Only 45 F
N E
The second bullet in the stem the use of LOWER and ABOVE together is confusing. Is the dP being changed to 2 psid OR 12 psid? Unless there some evaluation value that I am not seeing recommend telling them specifically the desired psid. (Reworded stem. Accepted question. 614/2012)
___Li___
48 H
M E
Need to discuss K/A to make sure that question matches K/A.
I dont see how the question relates to loss of SDC. The question is asking for the requirements for having SDC in service; it doesnt test anything associated with a loss of SDC.
I think it can be reworded to lose an RHR subsystem and then ask whether or not the LCO is met or NOT met. (Modified question. Accepted question.
Licensee stated that this is an RO question. Information needed to answer question is above the line in T.S.
6/4/2012) 49 H
M K/A match is weak. Nothing states or implies that refueling is in progress. A lowering fuel pool level is not the same as a refueling accident. From looking at the distractor analysis and the original question, it appears some portion of the stem conditions got inadvertently omitted. Need to revisit the conditions provided in the original question and incorporate them into the question stem.
The ARMs automatically reset, but the RED trip lights must be manually reset. Are we testing minutia?
I can see the need for knowing whether the ARMs automatically reset or not, but is the condition of the lights something the applicants should know?
(Modified stem to better match KIA. Accepted question as is 6/4!2012) 50 F
B U/?
Not sure why distractors A and D are plausible (accepted distractor D. Will modify distractor A. Should have been an E.
6/412012). Reviewed revised question and concluded it was OK.
Made it a two part question (6/5112
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
8.
Q#
LOK (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only 51 H
X N
U/?
Please explain why you think this question meets the K/A. Do not see where purpose or function is identified. (question is Ok as is.
Should be S. 61412012).
52 H
f
IN 5
Why is a reference needed? (Accepted Question. 6/4/2012) 53 H
M S
(OK) 54 H
X X
B U/?
Explain how the question matches K/A.. Identify why the distractors based on using the graft. Some of the numbers used in the distractors should be based on using the incorrect graft. (Accepted question as is. Should have been an S. 6/4/2012) 55 H
X M
E Need to reword stem and distractors. The correct answer is the only one that doesnt have ONLY in the choices given. Rewrite the question and make sure there is not a subset issue. (Modified stem. and distractors. Changes acceptable. 6/4/2012).
II_L_
jNS(OK)
F F
T (OK)
I1__________
I I_L jN 5(OK)
NJSLOD 60 H
2 M
S?
Need to make sure that there is not a subset issue. May need to reword the stem. (Changed wording in stem. Addressed subset issue. 6/4112) 61 H
1 N
S jConsiderLODtobea2.(OK) fiE::_
fNsOK 64 F
X N
U Distractors C & D are not plausible. Why would anyone think that only a manual actions would start a fire suppression? (Based on system design, if another room was selected, there would only be a manual start. Manually actuated systems in some areas.
Should be a S OK. 6/4/12) 65 H
M SI?
Take another look to make sure that K/A match. (question as is, is OK -S-6/4!12)
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
8.
Q#
LOK (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only 66 H
1 B
U/S There could be several correct answers (C & D). LOD. (Based on review with licensee, there is only one correct answer.
Question is OK. Should be S. 6/4/12)
LJ_
N S(OK)
L_
fM 5LOD 69 H
N S
Is this an RO question. (licensee says this is an RO question.
information needed to answer question is above the double line. Should be S.
6/5/2012) 70 H
N f 5?
Is this an RO question? Yes.... Accepted question as is 614/12) 71 H
[ x f
B U/?
Cueing in the stem (Agreed to use question as is. No cueing.
I
]
6/4/2012)
.zI
I_____I
N S
LOD (OK. 614/12) 73 H
X B
U/S There could be two correct answers. A and B. Need to discuss at expected normal full power radiation levels (Will revisit 6/4/12)
Revised question. Appears the there is no longer two correct answers. Will pay close attention during validation of exam next week. 6/5/12.
EZZZZ_
75 F
f N
S/?
Need to talk about K/A match. (OK.
KJA match
- 6/4/1 2) 76 H
N S
(OK) 77 H
1 X
N U
RO question. LOD 1 (Agreed that this is not a SRO question.
Will replace KIA and write a new question 6/1/1 2) (used original KIA and revised question to match K/A.
Reworded question. Revised question is OK. 6/4/12)
Do you expect candidate to have surveillance frequencies 78 H
N E
Memorized? ( agreed to use question as is, provided additional information as to why 6 is plausible TS 3.3.1.2-1. No changes required. Should have been an 5. 6/1/2012) 79 H
N U
RO question 55.41 (Revised question distractors. Should have been identified as E. 6/1/1 2)
Appears to be basic GFES Knowledge. K/A mismatch and. No 80 H
X N
U procedure selection required. Licensee proved point. Accepted question as is. Should have been an 5). 6/1/12 81 H
N S
(OK)
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
8.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred. IPartial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unitsj ward K/A Only
RO question. (Revised stem to better define SROs 82 H
X M
E responsibility of directing procedure actions. 611112) Question as provided was S. Changes made were simple enhancement) 83 H
M S
ATWS part is basic RO knowledge. (Licensee agreed with ATWS 84 H
X N
E concept. REG-0025 provided notification requirements.
Question S. 6/1/12) 85 H
B E/U Not sure this is a RO question.
It appears as if the first part of the question can be answered with system knowledge. The procedures identified have different numbers but the same titles. (Question is OK. Changed to an S. 6/1112).
86 H
N S
(OK) 87 H
N U
RO question. (Requires detailed knowledge of flow chart to answer question. Question is SRO. Should beanS. 611112) 88 H
M U
RO question.
I do not see where SRO knowledge is required to answer this question. (Decided to accept question as is based on information provided by the licensee. Question should have been an S. 6/Ill 2) 89 H
N S
(made one change to RX Level OK) 90 H
M S
(OK) 91 H
B S
(OK) 92 H
M S
(OK) 93 H
X M
U K/A mismatch. The first part of the question appears to be RO knowledge. Do you expect the applicant to know from memory the action statement?
(Will revisit this question next week...611/l 2) reviewed new question OK. 6/4/1 2) 94 H
N S
(OK) 95 H
M E
Do we expect them to know surveillance requirements form.
(Question is OK. Specific SRO learning objective addresses this. 6/4/2012) 96 H
N S
(OK) 97 H
X N
U RO questions. Question appears to test on specific operator actions.
(Decided to accept questions. Question should be sat. 6/1/2012) 98 F
M S
(OK)
1 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
8.
Q#
LOK (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues TIE Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO B/MIN U/EIS Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only 99 H
X B
U K/A mismatch. Does not test basis. Explain why you consider B plausible.
(Revised question) 100 H
M S
(OK)
ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Edwin I Hatch Date of Exam:
6 /28/ 2012 Exam Level: ROISR Initials Item Description a
b c
1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading N/A.,
2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented I//A 3.
Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers_spot_check>_25%_of examinations) 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, it/i as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail i4 A
5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades 47/
are justified A
6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of 21 questions missed by half or more of the_applicants Printed Name/Signature Date miait-A16I<5
/
I
- a. Grader 1<c&h.V. 6h.1/
7iqfoiz
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
/
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) Eh 4 ta -.
7z/9/2-ja.
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
/t1,9h
/
(*)
The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.