ML12261A342

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
G20120489/EDATS: OEDO-2012-0421 - Acknowledgement Letter to David A. Lochbaum 2.206 - Redress Technical Specifications Deficiencies Regarding Irradiated Fuel at the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant
ML12261A342
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/31/2012
From: Leeds E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Lochbaum D
Union of Concerned Scientists
Saba, Farideh
Shared Package
ML122161A341 List:
References
EDATS: OEDO-2012-0421, G20120489, OEDO-2012-0421
Download: ML12261A342 (6)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 31,2012 Mr. David A. Lochbaum Director, Nuclear Safety Project Union of Concerned Scientists P.O. Box 15316 Chattanooga, TN 37415

Dear Mr. Lochbaum:

On July 10, 2012, you and two copetitioners filed a petition addressed to Mr. R. William Borchardt, Executive Director for Operations of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), on behalf of the North Carolina Waste Awareness & Reduction Network, the Nuclear Information and Resource Service, and the Union of Concerned Scientists. Following the regulations of Section 2.206, "Requests for Action Under this Subpart," of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the NRC has referred this petition to me.

In your original petition, you requested that the NRC take action in the form of an order either modifying the Brunswick Stearn Electric Plant Units 1 and 2 (Brunswick), operating licenses' technical specifications (as detailed in the petition) or requiring the licensee to submit amendment requests for these licenses.

As the basis for your request, you stated that "the current technical specifications for the Brunswick Units 1 and 2, reactors are based on the assumption that the sole scenario involving damage to irradiated fuel outside of the reactor vessel is that resulting from a fuel handling accident involving recently irradiated fuel (i.e., fuel that was within a critical reactor core within the past 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />)." However, "loss of water inventory from the spent fuel pool or sustained loss of its cooling capability can also result in damage to irradiated fuel. And the potential extent of that damage and the amount of radioactivity released from damaged fuel can be considerably larger than that resulting from a fuel handling accident." You stated that "because the probability of spent fuel pool water inventory or cooling loss is not so low as to be neglected, the technical specification provisions that currently manage the risk from a fuel handling accident must be extended to also cover other credible spent fuel pool events." I would like to express my appreciation for your effort in bringing these matters to the attention of the NRC.

You and the co petitioner, Ms. Mary Olson, had a recorded conference call with the NRC petition review board (PRB) on August 15, 2012, to discuss and supplement the petition. The NRC has made the official transcript of the August 15, 2012, conference call accessible to the public on the NRC's Electronic Reading Room through the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), http://www.nrc.gov/readiog-rm/adams.html(ADAMS Accession No. ML12234A730).

The PRB recommends accepting your petition because it meets the criteria for review under the 10 CFR 2.206 process. The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation will review your petition. As provided by 10 CFR 2.206, the NRC will take action on your request within a reasonable time period. I have assigned Ms. Farideh Saba to manage your petition. You can reach Ms. Saba at 301-415-1447.

D. Lochbaum

- 2 I have enclosed for your information a copy of the notice that the NRC will file with the Office of the Federal Register for publication. I have also enclosed for your information a copy of lVIanagement Directive 8.11, "Review Process for 10 CFR 2.206 Petitions," and the associated brochure NUREG/BR-0200, "Public Petition Process," prepared by the NRC's Office of Public Affairs.

Sincerely, Eric J. L eds, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

1. Federal Register Notice
2. lVIanagement Directive 8.11
3. NUREG/BR-0200 cc w/copy of incoming 10 CFR 2.206 request:

Mr. Michael J. Annacone, Vice President Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Carolina Power & Light Company P.O. Box 10429 Southport, North Carolina 28461 cc via email:

Mr. Jim Warren Executive Director North Carolina Waste Awareness & Reduction Network Email: jim@ncwarn.org Ms. Mary Olson Nuclear Information and Resource Service Email: maryo@nirs.org

[7590-01-P]

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324; NRC-2012-XXXX]

Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2 Receipt of Request for Action AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Request for Action; receipt.

SUMMARY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) is giving notice that by petition dated July 10, 2012, Mr. David Lochbaum (the petitioner) and two copetitioners on behalf of the North Carolina Waste Awareness & Reduction Network, the Nuclear Information and Resource Service, and the Union of Concerned Scientists have requested that the NRC take action with regard to Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2 (Brunswick). The petition is included in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID <NRC-20YY-XXXX> when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may access information related to this document, which the NRC possesses and is publicly available, using any of the following methods:

Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID <NRC-20YY-XXXX>. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-492-3668; e-mail: CaroI.Galiagher@nrc.gov.

-2 NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select "ADAMS Public Documents* and then select "Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.* For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or bye-mail to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this notice (if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced.

NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room 01-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Farideh Saba, Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch 2-2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555. Telephone: 301 415-1447; e-mail: Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On July 10, 2012, the petitioners requested that the NRC take action with regard to Brunswick. The petitioners request that the NRC take action in the form of an order either modifying the Brunswick operating licenses' technical specifications (as detailed in the petition) or requiring the licensee to submit amendment requests for these licenses.

-3 As the basis for this request. the petitioners stated that "the current technical specifications for the Brunswick Units 1 and 2. reactors are based on the assumption that the sole scenario involving damage to irradiated fuel outside of the reactor vessel is that resulting from a fuel handling accident involving recently irradiated fuel {Le., fuel that was within a critical reactor core within the past 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />)." However, "loss of water inventory from the spent fuel pool or sustained loss of its cooling capability can also result in damage to irradiated fuel. And the potential extent of that damage and the amount of radioactivity released from damaged fuel can be considerably larger than that resulting from a fuel handling accident." The petitioners stated that "because the probability of spent fuel pool water inventory or cooling loss is not so low as to be neglected. the technical specification provisions that currently manage the risk from a fuel handling accident must be extended to also cover other credible spent fuel pool events."

The NRC is handling this petition pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 2.206 of the Commission's regulations. The petition has been referred to the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR). As provided by 10 CFR 2.206, appropriate action will be taken on this petition within a reasonable time. The petitioners had a recorded conference call with the NRR petition review board on August 15.2012, to discuss and supplement the petition. A copy of the petition is available for inspection under ADAMS Accession No. ML12193A123. The official transcript of the August 15, 2012, conference call is accessible via ADAMS Accession No. ML12234A730.

Dated at Rockville. Maryland, this "~f day of October, 2012.

Eric J. Le ds, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Package ML12261A341 Incoming ML12193A123 and ML12255A080 Letter ML12261A342 FRN ML12261A344

  • Concurrence via e-mail OFFICE DORUPM DORULA Tech Editor
  • DSS/DD NAME FSaba BTuily JBorges MMarsh RMusser (JDodson for)

JDavis DATE 09/19/12 09/20/12 10/01/12 10/17/12 09/24/12 10/10/12 OFFICE DE/DO DPR*

DRNDD DORUBC (A)

DORUD NRR/D NAME MCheok MBanic SLee JQuichocho (JPoole for)

MEvans (SCoffin for)

ELeeds DATE 10/11/12 09/25/12 10/11/12 10/18/12 10/25/12 10/31/12