ML122610529

E-mail Regarding Acceptance Review for License Amendment Request to Add RHR Drywell Spray TS

ML122610529
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	09/17/2012
From:	Richard Ennis Plant Licensing Branch 1
To:	Tom Loomis Exelon Generation Co
Ennis R, NRR/DORL, 415-1420
References
TAC ME9445, TAC ME9446
Download: ML122610529 (1)

Text

From: Ennis, Rick Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:21 PM To: Tom Loomis Cc: Richard.Gropp@exeloncorp.com

Subject:

Acceptance Review for TACs ME9445 and ME9446 - Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 -

License Amendment Request to Add RHR Drywell Spray TS

Tom, By letter dated August 29, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12243A497), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a license amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3. The proposed amendment would add Technical Specification (TS) requirements for the Residual Heat Removal Drywell Spray function.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.

Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation