ML12116A225

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML12116A225
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/24/2012
From:
Division of Reactor Safety I
To: Peter Presby
Entergy Nuclear Generation Co
Shared Package
ML113070677 List:
References
TAC U01843
Download: ML12116A225 (11)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201*1 Facility: Fi';'~t.1c... Date of Examination: Z/Z:1 /tz Developed by: Written - Facility [!("NRC /I Operating - Facility ~ NRC Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b) /~

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

~

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 4_

-120

[-90]

4.

[5.

Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)]

./

.4L L,

.-2

{-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-1's, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)

JIfII" _

{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

~

{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6. and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d) ~~

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) ,<,

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.l.I; C.2.i; ES-202)

~

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

~

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

~

~

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC superv~~n:..tf" (C.2.i; C.3.h) Wb17t1J .4

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)

~

-7 15. Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) ~

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) )4

  • Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 25 of 28

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Date of Examination:

Z r2..

Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

W R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section 0.1 of ES-401 and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled.

T T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

E N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KJA statements are appropriate.

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed soenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S and major transients.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule At, I~

L without compromising exam integrity. and ensure that each applicant can be tested using "'.... r.,tr 1 f-_i~_+-__~_~_~_a,-t~t_eO_~_;_pn_Ii~_;_n_~ _.s_~g_u~_\fi_tl~_:_~t_ti~_;) _ma_On_d _if~_~_~_tSs_C~_;_~_:r_~o_~_hw_a~_lIn_~_o~_~_~_nr_C; _~O_e~_~_:. .;.~. ;. ~_~_~_I~ca_bs_t:_~_u_e_nt_d_a_y_s_.-+-_II.VL_S.~*II, 3.

C. To the extent possible, assess wh':ther the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks r"""

~I W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form

/ (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) InO tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)J NI (4) 'tJie number of new or modified tasks meets or exoeeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1.

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE inSights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N

c. Ensure that KJA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

A L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
a. Author

~//$JJJJame/Signature Date IZfotll1 r I

b. Facility Reviewer (*) II-f-II
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) IZ-.zt-/{
d. NRC Supervisor Q-l.'l...-It Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

MASTER

.lc F 3 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES~201-3

1. Pre-Examination 2.1'17II~

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 3/ S (12. as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best oj my k£9lO!~dge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) Of'J./27/,Z, f5{"f=rom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

.'¥"(" ...... J :y~r":\1:;..V" JI'J AJ J ~.",~. j,~1 ...-...* } .

_1"""'1'*'. ';'-" y.-~'>>n\-.

  • "c

-~6?"r(i>;:. "f'!)¥-':ll-:;r~'----~

Y" 1.

~_.,7 YF!... ~2.+--

3/Z!...l.Lz......

'J,/;:; ';;;;; J~r-r;,u..e."4~

7~::zK~"-~

"-; '~

~~~

~~

1$4"~ f

'! If..

i:Jjt

..s; Jr~ ~L

([) ft!-\ -re ( ~ u>

rtJ fer ~;t Mt\S\ER

MASTE'R VA(;£ 2. b-f3 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination

'1./Z'7/I2.

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 1/' liz" as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e,g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowleqge I dOd not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of Z(l7{1z-, W~~rom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC, PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE:

SNO

?f!ISM == =£'& == :~~

I~ ~' ~

E8-201, Page 27 of 28 MASt £ (Z

3 cf3 ES*201 Examination Security Agreement Fonn ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination z(t1(1'Z.

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the weekes) of zt~/{'" as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have nQt been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post*Examination To the best of my knowieqge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information conceming the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weekes) of zrt 7f!t, 3/o/If From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE i'

1./t'*cM.t.A.4!I. A-om-~J(uq ¥z.,,(/,iJ, 1/,';(2

2. '2/1/0 J'/:2.-/~

3.

4. Lv, Of.$. c'M,MP-IN'.."/. '3 Il. l.l:::.
5. .:::> 5!1rp" At , a....

6.

7. AN' "V""/CY ~- 0' , f*

"f'S q,

3'Jij;.

10.~~ '. A c-'"

... SbM:';:';"';~i.

"T'<<c /#1/;5r" --

,~

11. ' l:;)4;J"JI1' ' - WMc MM.k?t:tl -7fH1NIIU>- iA:'6~' ~ r'k{~JIf, * - - **
12. "t,.;rtf" e~ r,.y. II!. t- II\I:;-r ' Ii ~-, , I ........< j , r Az::;:a; "
13. faCh L-,..d .UCt,&  ;:: wC~
14. "Th*-., \+-r £ .,...,l,.q.tr __ /II', ~
15. '

NOTES: -

ES-201, 27 of 28

ES*301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES*301*3 FacUi Date of Examination:

1. General Criteria c#

a.

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durin this examination.

c.

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acce table limits.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent a licants at the desi nated license level.

2. Walk*Throu h Criteria
a. Each JPM includes the following. as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and speCific designation if deemed to be time-critlcal by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that Include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of ste s, if a licable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES*301*1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a co is attached.

Printed Name I Signature Date

a. Author
  • ~/;~
b. Facility Reviewer(*) tr21;1t.
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 2-Z2.-11.
d. NRC Supervisor 2-23-/'2 NOTE: The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. I eviewer initial items in Column "e"; chief examiner concurrence re uired.

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

ES*301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Rev 1 Form ES-301-4 Facility: Fitzpatrick Date of Exam: Feb 27, 2012 Scenario Numbers: 1 /213 (spare) Operatlng Test No.:

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Rev 1 Initials a b' c#

1. The Initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. ...It- ti! ~
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. ..Pc.- (iJ .~ ..
3. Each event description consists of
  • the point in the scenario when It is to be initiated
  • the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
  • the symptomslcues that will be visible to the crew ft-c:# ~
  • the expected operator actions (by shift position)
  • the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non*mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated Into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismiC event. ..A tIP 16~
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ~ Itff ~
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ft.. @, ~
7. if time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

~ @ ~

Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. ..JiL f1IJ ~
9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d}. any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

""""L .fJ ~

10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301. A... ti! ~

11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES*301*6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

~ .fP ~

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events

..Jot. (jY ~

speCified on Form ES*301*5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

I~

13. The level of difficulty Is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. .A:.-

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d) Actual Attributes 511 S2 / S3,....)

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 7/ 10 I 7 .A- @ 1&1
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1I 6 I 1 ./C- @ "."
3. Abnormal events (2-4) 31 2 / 3 -'t... Gi) ~
4. Major transients (1-2) 11 4 1 2 ft- (i) ~
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 11 2 1 2 Jt...... @ ~.
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 01 2 / 1 A- @ ,4
7. Critical tasks (2-3) I 2 I 3 I 2 .p- IIf'" Ip

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Rev 1 Form ES-301-5 JAF Date of Exam: 2/2012 Operating Test No.:

A E Scenarios p V P E 1 2 3 (Spare) T M 0 I L N CREW POSIT~REW P CREW POSITION N

I T T C S A S A B S A B I A M A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C p L U T P M(')

E R I SRO-11 RX NOR 1 1 2 1

1 1

f11 1

[8J lIe 2,5,7,8 7,8 6 - 4 2

~

6,9,10,12 5 2 1 3 - 2 2 1 1 - 1 0 SRO-12 NOR 1 2 2 - 1 1

[8J lie 2,4,7,8 3.7.11.13 8 - 4 2 MAJ 6 ~9'10'12 5 - 2 1 TS RX

= .4.5 1

3 2

2 1

2 0

SRO-13 NOR 1 1 - 1 1

[8J lie 2.5,7,8 7.8 6 - 4 2 MAJ 6 6,9,10.12 5 - 2 1 TS 2,3,4 3 - 2 2 RX 1 - 1 0 SRO-U1 NOR 1 2 2 - 1 1

[8J lie 2.4,7,8 3,7,11,13 8 - 4 2 illl MAJ 6 6,9,10,12 5

~

TS 3,4,5 -

RX 2 -

Spare tYnR 4 4 - 1 1

[8J lIe 1.3,5.6,8,10 1,3 - 4 2 MAJ 7.9 7,9 - 2 1 TS 1,5.6,8 - 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 evenl numbers lor each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants.

ROs musl serve in both the 'at-the-controls (ATC)" and 'balance-of**plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (IIC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO addftionally serves in the BOP posiUon, one tiC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulatlons may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.S.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (') Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunclions on a 1-for-1 basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide inSight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the light-hand columns.

- 1

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Rev 1 Form ES-301-6 I Facility: JAF Date of Examination: 2/2012 Operating Test No.:

APPLICANTS RO D RO D RO RO SRO-11 SRO-U

  • D SRO-12 SRO-U
  • D SRO-13 SRO-U D SRO SRO-U1.

D Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 31 SRO ATe ATe SRO SRO ATe ATe SRO Interpret/Diagnose 2,3,4, 3,6,7,8, 2,4,6, 7,8 3,4,5,6,7, 2,3,4,5, 3,6,7,8, I 2,4,6, 3,4,5,6,7, Events 5,6, 9,12 9,10, 6, 9,12 7,8 9,10, I and Conditions 12,13 12,13 I

Comply With and 1,2,3, 1,6,7, 1,2,4,6, 1,2,3,4,5, 1,2,3,4, 1,6,7, 1,2,4,6, 1,2,3,4,5,

  • Use Procedures (1) 4,5,6 8,9,12 7,8 6,7,9,,10, 5,6 8,9,12 7,8 6,7,9,10, 12,13 12,13 I Operate Control NA 1,7,8, 1,2,4,6, NA NA 1,7,8, 1,2,4,6, NA Boards (2) 9,12 7,8 9,12 7,8 Communicate All 1,2,3,6, 1,2,3,4,6, All All 1,2,3,6, 1,2,3,4, All and Interact 7,8,9, 7,8 7,8,9, 6,7,8 10,12 10,12 Demonstrate (3) All NA NA All All NA NA All Supervisory Ability Comply With and 2,3,4 NA NA 3,4,5 2,3,4 NA NA 3,4,5 Use Tech. Specs.

(3) I Notes:

(1 ) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

ES-401 W rJOtten Exammaf Ion Qua nI[Y Chec krISt Rev 2 Form ES 401 6 -

Facility: Fitzpatrick Date of Exam: 3/8/12 Exam Level: ROO SROX Initial Item Description a b* c#

1. Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. ..Pt:..- fiJ /&?
2. a.

b.

NRC KlAs are referenced for all questions.

Facility learning objectives are referenced as available. ..Jl #P ~

3. SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 ~ ~ ~
4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office). /.c;
5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

_ the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

_ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or .9&-- ~ A.

_ the examinations were developed independently; or

.:/... the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only question distribution(s) at right.

Bank 3/2 Modified 2/0 New 70/23 .A e ~

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 34/5 41/20 .Jl- (iJ ~

selected KlAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO question distribution(s) at right.

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers Jr- @ ~

or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; .A- (iJ ~

deviations are justified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. ...IV' I~ I.k-
11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct s with the value on the cover sheet.

.A.. I@ ~

u,~~ii~~~~i9~~

Date

a. Author jf AA///
b. Facility Reviewer (*) ~ .... 1.'j(P_'I""',.d / A/tl/Ltl/u /P Ull I I
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) f'~fcr ffe.sbvl LJ. jJy ,A./..ib- 4/1 '/Z
d. NRC Regional Supervisor 1b1Jkt.J)~~N /rJJ. llJL fP: " ..

JI-$/JZ::,

( ./

Note:

  • The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facilit:  ::r~ A C;~.\.;z -k,,-K Date of Exam: M...r.J... 8 Z()I1-- Exam Le Initials Item Descri tion 1.

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s at check> 25% of examinations
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as a licable +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are 'ustified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12116A225&oldid=2462886"