ML12072A344
| ML12072A344 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 03/01/2012 |
| From: | Peter Presby Operations Branch I |
| To: | Entergy Nuclear Generation Co |
| Jackson D | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML113070677 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC U01843 | |
| Download: ML12072A344 (6) | |
Text
JAF Draft Operating Exam Comments General All JPMs should list the related KIA being tested and its importance ratings.
Admin..IPMs Admin 1:
Provide information to allow review of SFP steps.
Admin 2:
Too simple, not discriminating, leading cueing Simulator JPMs A:
No comment B:
Needs minor change to cue for local valve position checks Simulator Scenarios Scenario 1:
Change leak malfunction location/size to ensure plant response independent timing for RWR loop isolation Delete critical task #1, does not meet definition for critical task, no consequence Scenario 2:
Make minor changes to examiner cues for next event initiation
ES*401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES*401*9 Q#
- 1.
LOK (F/H)
- 2.
LOD (1-5)
- 3. Psychometric Flaws Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Focus Dist.
1 F
1.5 2
H 3
H 4
F X
5 H
6 7
H F
8 H
9 10 F
F X
11 H
12 H
13 14 F
F 1
15 H
16 F
17 H
18 H
19 F
20 H
- 4. Job Content Flaws Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Link units ward
- 5. Other Q=
SRO KiA Only X
X
- 6.
B/M/N B
N N
N N
M N
N B
B N
N N
N N
B M
N N
N
- 7.
- 8.
U/E/S Explanation U
KiA mismatch. Low LOD. Replaced question.
E Minor editorial change.
S U
Modified multiple implausible distractors.
U KiA mismatch. Re-wrote question.
S Minor editorial change.
E Modifiied question to improve plausibility.
E Minor psychometric enhancement.
E Modified choices to improve plausibility.
U Replaced multiple implausible distractors.
E Added reference for the question.
E Wrote a new question at request of Chief Examiner to eliminate overlap with requested change to operating exam.
U Low LOD. Wrote new question.
S E
Minor changes to distractors to enhance plausibility.
S E
Replaced question with modified bank question to address problem with single non-credible distractor.
E Changed stem conditions to better match KA.
S S
Page 1
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9 21 F
22 H
23 F
24 F
25 F
26 H
27 F
28 H
X 29 H
30 H
31 H
32 H
33 H
X 34 H
X 35 F
36 F
X 37 F
38 H
39 F
40 H
1.5 41 F
42 H
N E
Modified choices to improve plausibility of distractors.
N E
Editorial changes.
N E
Modified question to raise LOD and improve distractors.
N S
B E
Modified question to improve clarity and distractor plausibility.
N E
Minor editorial changes.
N E
Modified question to improve plausibility of distractors and ensure clear basis for key answer.
N U
Modified question to make it test the KIA.
N E
Modified stem to improve LOD.
N S
N S
8 E
Minor editorial changes.
N U
Modified question to match the KA.
N U
Modified question to match the KA.
N S
N U
Modified question to fix multiple implausible distractors.
N S
N S
N E
Minor editorial changes.
N U
Low LOD. Replaced question.
N E
Modified stem to improve operational validity.
N E
Modified single distractor to improve plausibility.
Page 2
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9
- 1.
- 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
LOK LOD Q#
(FfH)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q= SRO B/MIN utE/S Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 43 H
N E
Low LOD. Modified question.
44 H
X X
N U
Low LOD. implausible distractors. Replaced question.
45 F
N E
Modified question to improve plausibility.
46 F
N E
Modified question and distractors to improve plausibility.
47 H
N E
Minor rewording.
48 H
N E
Minor changes to improve clarity.
49 H
N E
Minor editorial changes.
50 H
N E
Minor editorial changes.
51 H
N E
Fixed typos. Modified question to improve operational validity.
52 H
N S
53 F
N E
Minor changes to improve clarity.
54 F
N S
55 F
N E
Enhanced justifications for answers. Minor changes to improve clarity.
56 H
N E
Minor editorial changes.
57 F
N S
58 H
N E
Replaced one distractor.
59 H
N E
Minor wording change.
60 H
N S
61 H
N S
62 H
N E
Minor wording changes to stem.
63 H
2 X
N E
Low LOD. Replaced question.
~----~-
Page 3
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9 Q#
- 1.
LOK (F/H)
- 2.
LOD (1-5)
- 3. Psychometric Flaws Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Focus Dist.
- 4. Job Content Flaws Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Link units ward
- 5. Other
- 6.
Q= SRO B/MIN KIA Only 64 H
N 65 66 67 H
F F
1 X
N N
N 68 F
N 69 70 71 F
F F
N N
N 72 F
N 73 74 75 76 77 F
F H
H H
N N
N B
N 78 F
X N
79 80 81 82 83 F
H H
H H
N N
N N
N Page 4
- 7.
U/E/S E
S U
U E
E E
E E
E E
S E
E U
E E
E E
E
- 8.
Explanation Enhanced question stem to add plausibility to distractors. Minor wording changes to distractors.
Low LOD. Replaced question, 2 correct answers. Replaced one of the choices.
Wrote a new question at request of Chief Examiner to eliminate overlap with requested change to operating exam.
Revised question to improve plausibility of distractors.
Minor wording changes to improve operational validity.
Minor editorial changes.
Replaced two distractors to improve plausibility. Minor editorial changes.
Enhanced answer justifications.
Enhanced answer justifications.
Replaced one implausible distractor, Minor wording changes.
Minor editorial changes, Low LOD. Multiple implausible distractors. Re-wrote question and distractors.
Minor re-wording for clarity.
Minor stem changes to improve distractor plausibility.
Replaced one distractor.
Modified one distractor to improve plausibility Minor editorial changes,
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9
- 1.
- 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
LOK LOD Q#
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO BfMtN UlEtS Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 84 H
X N
U Modified question to address multiple implausible distractors.
85 H
N E
Reworded stem and one distractor.
86 H
X X
X N
U Replaced question to fix SRO only. multiple correct answers and distractor credibility issues.
87 H
N E
Minor editiorial changes.
88 H
N E
Modified question stem and one distractor to enhance distractor plausibility.
89 H
N E
Minor editorial changes.
90 H
N E
Minor stem wording change. Updated justification.
91 H
N E
Reworded question and distractors to improve question alignment with AOP actions.
92 H
N E
Removed third elements from choices to improve question discriminatory value.
93 H
N E
- 1) Modified values in two distractors to improve plausibility 2)
Question is a KIA match because it matches the first part of the KIA statement.
94 F
N E
Minor justification changes.
95 F
N E
Minor wording changes.
96 H
B S
97 H
B E
Minor editorial change.
98 H
X N
U Revised question to fix implausible distractors.
99 H
N E
Minor wording changes.
100 F
N S
~---
Page 5