ML12089A517
| ML12089A517 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 05/24/2011 |
| From: | Vogle R Entergy Corp |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML12089A514 | List: |
| References | |
| RAS 22118, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, nxp IP-EP-410, Rev 7 | |
| Download: ML12089A517 (11) | |
Text
ENT000278 Submitted: March 29, 2012 IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 7 Enlergy EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 1 of 11 Protective Action Recommendations Prepared by:
Print Name Approval: Brian Sullivan Print Name Dale Effective Date: June 30, 2011 IP-EP-410 (PAR) R7.doc
IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED Enlergy", EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IP-EP-410 Revision 7 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ of
- - 11 Table of Contents 1 .0 PURP OSE ............ ..... ....... ... ......... .......... ........... ...........
........... .. ...... ........... ........... ........... ........... .. 3 2 .0 REFER ENCE S ... ... ... .... .... .. ..... ........... ........... ....... ... ..........
......... .. ... .. ... .. .. ........... ........... ........... ... 3 3.0 DEFIN ITIONS ............ . .. ... ......... ...... .. ..... ..... .. .. ............
.. ..... ............ ...... ........... ....... .. ... ........... ....... 3 4.0 RESPO NSiBIL ITIES .. ........... ........... .......... ..... .........
...... .. ............ .. ... .... .... ... ......... .. ... ... .... ......... .. 3 5.0 DETAI LS ... ........... ........... ........... ........ ........... ........ ............
.. ............ ... .... ........... ........... ........... .. ..... 3 5 .1 NUE. ALERT. SITE AREA EMERG ENCy ........ ..... ......... ..
.. ........... ......... .... ...... .. ....... ....... ...... 3 5 .2 GEN ERAL EMERG ENCY ... .... ...... ..... .. ....... .. ........... ............
.. .... ...... .. .. ... .. .. .. ... ....... .. ... ... ... .. .. 3 6.0 INTER FACES ... ... .. .. ............ ....... ... .. ... ..... ..... .......... ...
.... ..... .. ........... ........... ........... . ......... ..... ........ 4 7.0 RECO RDS ........... ........... ..... ...... ........... ........... ..... .. ...........
........... .. ... .... ... ... .. ....... .... ............ .... .. ... 4 8 .0 REQU IREME NTS AND COMM ITMEN T CROS S-REF EREN CE .. .. .... ............ . .. ........... ..... ... 4 9 .0 ATIAC HMEN TS ...... ....... ............ .... ... ..... .. .. .. .. .. ..........
...... ... ............ . .... ......... ..... ..... .. .. .......... ..... .. 4 9.1 FLOWC HART FOR GENER AL EMERG ENCY PROTE CTIVE ACTION DECISI ONS ........... .......... 5 9 .2 STABIL ITY CATEG ORY - DOWNW IND KEYHO LE SECTO R C ORREL ATION TABLE ............ ..... 6 9 .3 EPA PROTE CTIVE ACTION GU iDELINE S ........... ...........
........... . .. .. ........... ........... ........... ........ 7 9 .4 OVERL AY SELEC TION FLOW CHART ......... ... ... ... .. .. ....
.. .. .. .. ........ ............ ........... ........... ........ 8 9 .5 BASIS FOR SECTO R SELEC TION IN PAR DETER MINATI ON .......... ... . .. . ....... . .......... ....... 9 9.6 OVERL AY STABIL ITY CATEG ORY- D OWNW IND KEYH OLE SECTO R CORRE LATION TABLE .. 1 0 9 .7 PROTE CTIVE ACTION RECOM MENDA TION DETER MINATI ON .... ..... ...... ..... ........... ..... ..... .. ... 1 1
-=- BnLergy.
IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES NON~aUALITV RELATED PROCEDURE IP~EP-410 Revision 7 REFERENCE USE Page ~ of 11 PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS 1.0 PURPOSE To prescribe the responsibilities and methods for determining recommended protective actions for New York State and County authorities.
2.0 REFERENCES
EPA Protective Action Guidelines 3.0 DEFINITIONS Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) - Specific recommendations made by the Emergency Director to the local authorities in accordance with Emergency Plan procedures based on Protection Action Guidelines.
4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 The Shift Manager is responsible for evaluating accident conditions, classifying the accident, and recommending protective actions to offsite authorities during the initial phases of the accident. The Emergency Director assumes these responsibilities when he takes control of the emergency response from the Shift Manager. The Radiological Assessment Coordinator will assist the Emergency Director with protective action recommendations.
4.2 The decision to initiate any protective actions is solely the responsibility of the local authorities.
5.0 DETAILS 5.1 NUE. Alert. Site Area Emergency Recommend no protective actions be taken.
5.2 General Emergency 5.2.1 The initial protective action recommendation should be made within 15 minutes of the GENERAL EMERGENCY declaration.
5.2.2 Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) shall be made in accordance with Attachment 9.1. Downwind Sectors are identified on Attachment 9.2.
5.2.3 Downwind sectors in Attachment 9.2 are determined using MIDAS wind fields. If MIDAS is unavailable, the isopleth overlays may be used as backup (Use Attachments 9.4 and 9.6 to support isopleth and sector selection) NOTE: Due to the wind field origin change between MIDAS and the isopleth overlays there is a difference in the down-valley plume shape. When using the overlays as a substitute for MIDAS, down-valley PARs may be different by one sector.
e= Entergy. IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 7 PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ! 01 11 5.2.4 The initial PAR shall be made in the first GENERAL EMER GENCY notification to the State/Counties. All subsequent, Part I notifications shall include the latest PAR.
5.2.5 Re-evaluate the PARs based on the following: (Attachmen t 9.7)
- Changes in Wind Direction or Speed
- Dose Assessment - (When release duration is NOT able to be estimated, use four hours as a default value),
- Field Data
- Plant Conditions 5.2.6 As protective action recommendations change, ensure appro priate steps are taken to protect the onsite population.
5.2.7 IF dose projections indicate an EPA PAG wilt be exceeded beyond 10 miles THEN send field teams to confirm projections and discuss possib le protective actions with offsite officials if projections prove possible.
6.0 INTERFACES 6.1 Evacuation Travel Time Estimates 6.2 IP-EP-310, Dose Assessment 6.3 State of New York KI Policy Paper 6.4 IP-EP-420, Use of Potassium Iodide by Indian Point Personnel during an Emergency 7.0 RECORDS NONE 8.0 REQUIREMENTS AND COMMITMENT CROSS-REFERENCE NONE 9.0 ATTACHMENTS 9.1 Flowchart for General Emergency Protective Action Decisions 9.2 Stability Category - Downwind Keyhole Sector Correlation Table 9.3 EPA Protective Action Guidelines 9.4 Overlay Selection Flow Chart 9.5 Basis for Sector Selection in PAR Determination 9.6 Overlay Stability Category-Downwind Keyhole Sector Correlation Table 9.7 Protective Action Recommendation Determination
e-=- Entergy. IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN NoM-OuALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-410 Revision 7 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page of
§ 11 Attachment 9.1 FLOWCHART FOR GENERAL EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ACTION DECISIONS Sheet 1 of 1 General Emergency Decfarect
- A radiological release'.
underway:ot .,tldpated Recommend EVACUATION and .Impl~ntatlon of the KI Plan fot 2 (wlthln1S 1'11... ) which Is of Mile Radlua and 2-6 Miles Downw"'d Sectors and advise ahort duration <<1 hr) remainder of EPZ population to golndoora and latan to EAS.
(Attachment 9.2)
Continue Asa_ament ba.ed on:
- Wind Speedl Direction
- Dose Ass_sment YES
- FleidDaIa
- EPA PAGa III
- Plant Conditions (Attachment 9.7) Recommend SHELTER and Implenwntatlon of the KI PI.,
for2 Mile Radua and 2--6 mles downwind Sectors and advise remainder of EPZpopulation to go Indoors and listen to EAS.
(Attachment 9.2)
NO Notes:
(1) Reterto Attachment 9.3 for Recommend EVACUATION and Implementation of the KI details on EPA P AGs.
Plan for 5 Mile Radll.- and (2) IF an EPA PAG Is exceeded 5-10 Miles Downwind Sectors (see notes) and advise or expected to be exceeded remainder of EPZ popuatlon to go Indoors and listen to beyond 10 miles THEN .
EAS. (Attac:hment 9.2) consider the need for PARs beyond 10 miles and discuss possible actons with State.
(3) IF recommended Sectors change THEN add new NO Sectors to new PAR. DO NOT subtract any Sector in which actions have previously been recommended.
(4) After Initial PAR, evaluate new PARS using Attachment 9.7 Recommend EVACUATION and Implementation of the KI Plan for entire 10 mile radius
~ Entergyll!i IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN NON-QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-410 Revision 7 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page § of 11 Attachment 9.2 Stability Category - Downwind Keyhole Sector Correlation Table Sheet 1 of 1 TABLE I - MIDAS Up-Valley Plumes Up-Valley Plumes (wind speeQ ~ 4 m/sec and wind direction from 102°.209°)
Pasquil Stability Categories Sectors affected A, S 16, 1,2, . 3,4 C, D,E, F,G 16, 1, 2, 3 TABLE II - MIDAS Down-Valley Plumes Down-Valley Plumes (wind speed ~ 4 m/sec and wind direction from 349°-101°)
Pasquill Stability Categories Sectors affected A.S 7, 8,9, 10, 11 C, D, E,F,G 7, 8,9, 10 TABLE 111- MIDAS Cross-Valley Plumes Cross-Valley (wind speed> 4 m/sec OR wind direction from 210°-348°)
Wind Direct Center Pasquil Stability Categories A & S Pasquil Stability Categories CoG From (deg) Sector No Sectors affected Sectors affected 169 - 190 1N 15, 16,1,2, 3 16,1,2 191 - 213 2 NNE 16, 1, 2, 3, 4 1,2,3 214 - 235 3NE 1, 2,3, 4,5 2, 3, 4 236 - 258 4 ENE 2,3, 4,5,6 3,4,5 259 - 280 5E 3,4, 5,6,7 4,5,6 281 - 303 6 ESE 4,5, 6,7,8 5,6,7 304 - 325 7 SE 5.6, 7. 8.9 6, 7, 8 326 - 348 8 SSE 6, 7. 8, 9. 10 7. 8. 9 349 - 010 9S 7, 8, 9. 10, 11 8, 9, 10 011 - 033 10 SSW 8, 9, 10, 11 . 12 9, 10. 11 034 - 055 11 SW 9. 10.11 , 12, 13 10, 11 . 12 056 - 078 12 WSW 10, 11 , 12,13,14 11 , 12, 13 079 - 100 13W 11,12,1 3. 14, 15 12, 13. 14 101 - 123 14 WNW 12, 13. 14. 15, 16 13, 14. 15 124 - 145 15 NW 13, 14,1 5, 16. 1 14, 15. 16 146 - 168 16 NNW 14. 15, 16, 1, 2 15, 16, 1
IPEC NON-QUALITY RELATED IP-EP-410 Revision 7 f/)Entergy/l} EMERGENCY PLAN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 1. of 11 Attachment 9.3 EPA PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDELINES Sheet 1 of 1 Recommended protective actions to reduce whole body and thyroid dose from exposure to a gaseous plume.
PROJECTED DOSE (REM)
TO THE POPULATION RECOMMENDED ACTIONS (a) COMMENTS Whole Body (TEDE) < 1 No planned actions. (b) Previously recommended State may issue an advisory to protective actions may be Thyroid (CDE) <5 seek shelter and await further reconsidered or terminated.
instructions.
Monitor environmental radiation levels Whole Body (TED E) Evacuate unless constraints make it If constraints exist, special impractical; then shelter. Monitor consideration should be given environmental radiation levels. for evacuation of children and Thyroid (CDE) ~5 Control access. pregnant women .
GUIDANCE ON DOSE LIMITS FOR WORKERS PERFORMING EMERGENCY SERVICES (REM)
Whole Body (TEDE):
10 Protecting valuable property Lower dose not practicable.
25 Lifesaving or protection of large populations Lower dose not practicable.
> 25 Lifesaving or protection of large population Only on a voluntary basis to persons fully aware of the risks involved.
TEDE- Total Effective Dose Equivalent: Sum of external effective dose equivalent and committed effective dose equivalent to nonpregnant adults from exposure and intake during an emergency situation. Workers performing services during emergencies should limit dose to the lens of the eye to three times the listed value and doses to any organ (including skin and body extremities) to ten times the listed value.
CDE- Committed dose equivalent (to the Thyroid).
(a) These actions are recommended for planning purposes. Protective action decisions at the time of the incident must take existing conditions into consideration.
(b) At the time of the incident, officials may implement low-impact protective actions in keeping with the principle of maintaining radiation exposures as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)
e Entergy. IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN NON-QUAUTY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-410 Revision 7 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page § of 11 Attachment 9.4 OVER LAY SELE CTION FLOW CHAR T(lSO PLET HS for HAND CALC)
Sheet 1 of 1 I OBTAIN METEOROLOGICAL DATA I
I I RECORD WIND DIRECTION I
J I RECORD WIND SPEED I
I I RECORD PASQUILL STABILITY CLASS I
I I
WIND SPEED So 4 m/s WIND SPEED > 4 m/s r--
I I WIND DIRECTION WIND DIRECTION WIND DIRECTION 340° . 101 ° 102°* 209° 210 0. 339° I I USE DOWN VALLEY USE UP VALLEY OVERLAY USE CROSS VALLEY OVERLAY GROUND OR ELEV. GROUND OR ELEV. OVERLAY GROUND OR -
(Blue) (Yellow) ELEV.
(Red)
I I PLACE OVERLAY OVER ALIGN OVERLAY ALONG PLANT ORIENTATION POINT (1)
WIND DIRECTION 1Plant Orientation Point
- a. Using down valley overlay (Blue) align horizontal axis on 90 0 - 270 0 line with plume extending south.
- b. Using up valley overlay (Yellow) align horizontal axis on 90°
- 270 0 line with plume extending north.
fIJEntergy8 IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN NON..QUALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-410 Revision 7 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page ~ of 11 Attachment 9.5 Basis for Sector Selection in PAR Determination Sheet 1 of 1 The Sectors provided in the Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) in this procedure are based on the following determinations:
When the conditions support Up-Valley Plumes (wind speed. ~ 4 m/sec and wind direction from 102°-209°) and either Pasquil Category A or B is in effect, the MIDAS display and appropriate overlay were viewed on the map and the affected Sectors were determined (Affected Sectors are any Sector that the Isopleth Lines touch beyond 2 miles). This was determined to be Sectors 16, 1,2, 3 and 4.
When the conditions support Up-Valley Plumes (wind speed. ~ 4 m/sec and wind direction from 102°-209°) and either Pasquil Category C, 0, E, F or G is in effect, the MIDAS display and appropriate overlay were placed on the map and the affected Sectors were determined.
(Affected Sectors are any Sector that the Isopleth Lines touch beyond 2 miles). This was determined to be Sectors 16, 1, 2 and 3.
When the conditions support Down-Valley Plumes (wind speed.~ 4 m/sec and wind direction from (349-101 for MIDAS and 340°-101° for overlay) and either Pasquil Category A or B is in effect, the appropriate overlay was placed on the map and the affected Sectors were determined. (Affected Sectors are any Sector that the Isopleth Lines touch beyond 2 miles).
This was determined to be Sectors 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11.
When the conditions support Down-Valley Plumes (wind speed. ~ 4 m/sec and wind direction from 349-101 for MIDAS and 340°-101° for overlay) and either Pasquil Category C, 0, E, For G is in effect, the appropriate MIDAS display or overlay was placed on the map and the affected Sectors were determined. (Affected Sectors are any Sector that the Isopleth Lines touch beyond 2 miles). This was determined to be Sectors 7,8,9 and 10.
When the conditions support Cross-Valley Plumes (wind speed. > 4 m/sec OR wind direction from 210°-348 for MIDAS and 210-339° for overlay) and either Pasquil Category A or B is in effect, the appropriate MIDAS display or overlay was placed on the map and the affected Sectors were determined. (Affected Sectors are any Sector that the Isopleth Lines touch beyond 2 miles). This was determined to be the Sector in which the Plume Centerline lays and 2 Sectors on either side of the centerline Sector.
When the conditions support Cross-Valley Plumes (wind speed. > 4 m/sec OR wind direction from 210°-348 for MIDAS and 210 - 339 for overlay) and either Pasquil Category C, 0, E, F and G is in effect, the appropriate overlay was placed on the map and the affected Sectors were determined. (Affected Sectors are any Sector that the Isopleth Lines touch beyond 2 miles). This was determined to be the Sector in which the Plume Centerline lays and 1 Sector on either side of the centerline Sector.
IPEC IJ/I)Entergy. EMERGENCY PLAN NON-QuALITY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-410 Revisio n 7 IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 10 of 11 Attachment 9.6 For Use as Backu p ONLY Overlay Stabi lity Categ ory - Down wind Keyhole Secto r Corre lation Table Sheet 1 of 1 T ABLE I OVERLAY U,p-1Va II ey PIumes Up-Valley Plumes (wind speed. S 4 m/sec and wind direction from 102°-209")
Pasquil Stability Categories Sectors affected A, B 16,1,2 ,3,4 C, D,E,F ,G 16,1,2, 3 TABLE II - OVERLAY 0 own-VaIIey PIumes Down-Valley Plumes (wind speed s4 m/sec and wind direction from 340°-101 °)
Pasquilf Stability Categories Sectors affected A,B 7,8,9.1 0,11 C.D,E ,F,G 7, 8,9, 10 o
TABLE 111- VERLAY cross-Valley P*. Iumes Cross-Valley (wind speed > 4 m/sec OR wind direction from 210°-33 9")
Wind Direct Center Pasquil Stability Categories A & B From (deg) Pasquil Stability Categories CoG Sector No Sectors affected Sectors affected 169 - 190 1N 15,16, 1,2,3 16,1,2 191 *213 2 NNE 16, 1, 2,3, 4 1, 2,3 214*23 5 3NE 1,2,3, 4,5 2,3,4 236*25 8 4 ENE 2, 3,4,5, 6 3,4,5 259*28 0 5E 3, 4,5, 6,7 4,5,6 281 - 303 6 ESE 4, 5,6,7, 8 5,6,7 304 - 325 7SE 5,6,7, 8,9 6, 7, 8 326
- 348 8 SSE 6, 7, 8, 9,10 7, 8, 9 349* 010 9S 7, 8,9,10 , 11 8,9, 10 011 *033 10 SSW 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 9, 10. 11 034 - 055 11 SW 9,10,1 1,12,1 3 10,11, 12 056 - 078 12WSW 10,11 , 12, 13,14 11, 12, 13 079 -100 13W 11 , 12,13, 14,15 12, 13, 14 101 - 123 14WN W 12,13, 14, 15, 16 13, 14, 15 124 - 145 15NW 13. 14, 15, 16, 1 14,15, 16 146 - 168 16NNW 14, 15, 16,1 , 2 15,16, 1
-= Entergy. IPEC EMERGENCY PLAN IMPLEMENTING NON-QUAUTY RELATED PROCEDURE IP-EP-410 Revision 7 PROCEDURES REFERENCE USE Page 11 of 11 Attach ment 9.7 Prote ctive Action Reco mmen dation Deter minat ion Asses smen t Guida nce Page 1 of 1 General Emergency Declared (Initial Declaration)
Recom mend the predefi ned plant conditio n PAR in accord ance with Meteor oloaica lln1orm atlon
... r General Emergency Continues and new PAR is being considered based on a wind shift or for any other reason NOTE 1 NOTE 2 Does a potential loss of the containment fission product barrier exist and containment source term indicate sPAGs could be exceede the new area if a release were to start?
d in H YES I c$
Does the radiological assessment show EPA PAGs will be rl YES /-- exceeded in the new area based on an actual release that is occurrina?
c$
Are plant conditions understood that could impact or cause
~
additional core damage (e.g., stablea ndlor magnitude of source Recommend a PAR for the new sector(s) term, core recovered, coolable geometry?
or area(s) based on dose assessment I results only I YESy I Is the radiological release pathway understood (filtered, non-filte red, monitored, unmonitored with little or no potential for release rate
~
to increase, little or no potential for RCS leak to increase)?
I I ... I YES I YES OR NlA If available, does off-site radiological data support the protective No action recommendation methodoloGv based on dose assessment?
NOTE 1: For PARs issued from the Control Room: Subsequent PARs are based on an extension of the initial default PAR to the new sectors and modified for other areas farther downwind based on dose assessment results as necessary.
NOTE 2: Do not use this flow chart when there is NO LOSS or POTENTIAL LOSS of the containment barrier.
Base any subsequent PARs on dose assessment using the new conditions for the area of interest.