ML11287A047
| ML11287A047 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yankee Rowe |
| Issue date: | 10/12/2011 |
| From: | Goshen J NRC/NMSS/SFST/LID/LB |
| To: | Recasha Mitchell Yankee Atomic Electric Co |
| Goshen J | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML11287A024 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC L24561 | |
| Download: ML11287A047 (2) | |
Text
Yankee Atomic Electric Company, Docket No. 50-29, Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Franklin County, Massachusetts.
Date of amendment request: August 10, 2011.
Description of amendment request: The amendment proposes to revise License Condition C(3)
Physical Protection. It is proposed to update the title of the Physical Security Plan, from the Yankee Nuclear Power Station Defueled Security Plan Revision 0, dated October 13, 1992, and Yankee Defueled Security Training and Qualification Plan Revision 0, dated October 13, 1992, to the Physical Security Plan for Yankee Rowe Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation.
Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration determination: As required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented below:
- 1.
Does the proposed amendment involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed amendment is a title change only. There is no reduction in commitments in the Physical Security Plan therefore; the proposed amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
Biweekly Notice Coordinator 2.
Does the proposed amendment create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed amendment is a title change only. There is no reduction in commitments in the Physical Security Plan therefore; the proposed amendment does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
- 3.
Does the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?
Response: No.
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
Attorney for licensee: Joseph Fay, Yankee Atomic Electric Company, 362 Injun Hollow Road, East Hampton, Connecticut, 06424-3099.
NRC Branch Chief: Michael D. Waters.