ML11279A035
| ML11279A035 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 09/21/2011 |
| From: | Repko R Duke Energy Carolinas |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 11-MN-001 | |
| Download: ML11279A035 (158) | |
Text
- &Duke OEEnergy REGIS T. REPKO Vice President McGuire Nuclear Station Duke Energy MG01 VP / 12700 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078 980-875-4111 980-875-4809 fax regis. repko@duke-energy. corn September 21, 2011 10 CFR 50.55a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
Subject:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy)
McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 Relief Request Serial # 11-MN-001 Limited Weld Examinations for Refueling Outages 1EOC20 and 2EOC19 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii), Duke Energy hereby requests NRC approval of relief for the welds listed in Table 1 of the proposed relief request. These welds were required to be examined in accordance with Inservice Inspection Plans for McGuire Units 1 and 2, Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval. The details of the request are included in the enclosure.
This submittal contains no regulatory commitments.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact P.T. Vu at (980) 875-4302.
Sincerely, Regis T. Repko Enclosure A47 www. duke-energy. corn
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory commission September 21, 2011 Page 2 xc:
V. M. McCree, Region II Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 J. H. Thompson, Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Mail Stop O-8G9A Rockville, MD 20852-2738 J. Zeiler NRC Senior Resident Inspector McGuire Nuclear Station
A U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission September 21, 2011 Page 3 bxc:
Mark Pyne (EC05ZB)
Ralph Connell (EC05ZB)
David Zimmerman (EC07C)
Rod Sheffield (EC07C)
Bill Callaway (EC07C)
Jeff Thomas (EC05P)
Kay Crane (MG01RC)
Ricky Branch (MG01MM)
Master File MC-801.01 (MG02DM)
ELL (EC050) 4
ENCLOSURE Relief Request 11-MN-001
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 1.0 Scope of Relief Request Relief is requested pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii) for welds listed in Table 1.
These welds were required to be examined in accordance with Inservice Inspection Plans for the following Units.
McGuire Nuclear Station - Unit 1 Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval Interval Start Date: 12/01/2001 McGuire Nuclear Station - Unit 2 Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval Interval Start Date: 03/01/2004 Table 1 Relief McGuire Examination Weld ID Item/Summary Examination Request Unit Performed Number Number Data Section Number (Refuelinq Number Outaqe) 2.0 1
1EOC20 1NCIF-3613-M1.R1.11.0390 See 3092 Attachment A Pages 1-6 3.0 1
1EOC20 1ELDHX-HD-M1.C1.20.0017 See FLG Attachment A Pages 7-13 4.0 1
1EOC20 1NVIFW53-M1.R1.11.2170 See 27 Attachment A Pages 14-19 5.0 1
1EOC20 1BCSHX-SH-M1.C1.30.0005 See 48 Attachment A Pages 20-24 6.0 2
2EOC19 2PZR-13 M2.B3.110.0003 See Attachment B Pages 1-13 7.0 2
2EOC19 2PZR-14 M2.B3.110.0004 See Attachment B Pages 14-26 8.0 2
2EOC19 2PZR-15 M2.B3.110.0005 See Attachment B Pages 27-39 9.0 2
2EOC19 2ACSHX-SH-M2.C1.30.0006 See 48 Attachment B Pages 40-43 Page 1 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 10.0 2
2EOC19 2NC2FW39-1 M2.R1.11.0048 See Attachment B Pages 44-51 11.0 2
2EOC19 2NC2FW40-M2.R1.11.0049 See 11 Attachment B Pages 52-53 12.0 2
2EOC19 2NC2FW43-1 M2.R1.11.0050 See Attachment B Pages 54-56 13.0 2
2EOC19 2NV2FW180-M2.R1.11.1566 See 1
Attachment B Pages 57-63 14.0 2
2EOC19 2NC2FW2-2 M2.R1.11.1730 See Attachment B Pages 64-72 15.0 2
2EOC19 NVFW10-20 PSI See Attachment B Pages 73-82 16.0 2
2EOC19 NVFW180-46 PSI See Attachment B Pages 83-88 17.0 2
2EOC19 NVFW180-45 PSI See Attachment B Pages 89-94 Page 2 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 2.0 Weld #1NCIF-3613-3092 2.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 1 Nozzle to Pipe Weld, Weld #1NC1F-3613-3092, Summary Number M1.R1.11.0390 2.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 2.3.
Applicable Code/Licensing Requirement WCAP-14572, Rev.1-NP-A, Supplement 2, Table 4.1-1, Examination Category R-A, Item Number R1.11, Fig.IWB-2500-8(c), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F The NRC authorized the inclusion of the RI-ISI program as an acceptable alternative to the ASME Code,Section XI requirements for ASME Code Class 1 piping welds, Examination Categories B-F and B-J and ASME Code Class 2 piping welds, Examination Categories C-F-1 and C-F-2 for the third ISI interval by letter dated June 12, 2002.
2.4.
Impracticality of Compliance Surface 1: Stainless Steel Pipe Surface 2: Stainless Steel Nozzle NPS: 14.0 inch Thickness: 1.406 inch During the ultrasonic examination of this weld, 62.5% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The limitations were due to the nozzle configuration that did not allow complete scanning from the nozzle side (S2).
Scanning requirements are described in 10CFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1). The aggregate coverage was calculated as follows:
600 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -
pipe) 600 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
nozzle) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 100% coverage in one circ.
direction (S3 - CW) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 100% coverage in one circ.
direction (S4 - CCW)
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (50% + 0% + 100% +
100%)/4 = 62.5%
In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, Page 3 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 1 I-MN-001 which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume C-D-E-F. Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.
2.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No alternative examinations are planned for the weld during the current inspection interval. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect expected degradation mechanisms such as thermal fatigue cracking and stress corrosion crack initiating at the pipe inside surface.
Additionally, radiography has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
2.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 12/01/2011.
2.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number M1.R1.11.0390 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1; Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 4 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 3.0 Weld #1 ELDHX-HD-FLG 3.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 1 Heat Exchanger Head to Flange Weld, Weld #1ELDHX-HD-FLG, Summary Number Ml.C1.20.0017 3.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 3.3.
Applicable Code Requirement
IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-A, Item Number C1.20, Fig. IWC-2500-1 (a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume A-B-C-D 3.4.
Impracticality of Compliance Surface 1: Carbon Steel Flange Surface 2: Stainless Steel Head Diameter: 9.5 inch Thickness: 0.750 inch The ultrasonic examination of the Heat Exchanger head to flange weld obtained 79.77% coverage of the required examination volume. ASME Section XI, Appendix III, 111-4420 requires coverage of the examination volume in two beam path directions and Appendix III, 111-4430 requires scanning on the weld crown in two directions. Due to the presence of one vent pipe, one draw pipe, one inlet connection, and one outlet connection, the scanning was limited in each direction for 48.4% of the total weld length. The total aggregate percent of coverage was calculated as follows.
For 51.6% of the total weld length:
450 shear waves obtained 51.6% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -
flange) 450 shear waves obtained 51.6% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
head) 450 shear waves obtained 51.6% coverage in one circ. direction (S3 -
CW) 450 shear waves obtained 51.6% coverage in one circ. direction (S4 -
CCW)
This aggregate coverage was calculated to be (51.6% + 51.6% +51.6% +
51.6%)/4 = 51.6%
For 48.4% of the total weld length:
450 shear waves obtained 38.28% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -
flange) 450 shear waves obtained 18.05% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
head) 450 shear waves obtained 28.17% coverage in one circ. direction (S3 -
CW)
Page 5 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 450 shear waves obtained 28.17% coverage in one circ. direction (S4 -
CCW)
This aggregate coverage was calculated to be (38.28% + 18.05%
+28.17% + 28.17%)/4 = 28.17%
The total aggregate coverage was 51.6% + 28.17% = 79.77%
The limitations were caused by the four physical scanning limitations, all located on the S2 head side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the heat exchanger would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume A-B-C-D. The achieved coverage did not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.
3.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because there is no practical access for film placement.
3.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 12/01/2011.
3.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number Ml.C1.20.0017 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
In addition to the above Code required volumetric examination Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 6 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 4.0 Weld #1 NV1 FW53-27 4.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 1 Pipe to Valve #1NV35A Weld, Weld #1NV1FW53-27, Summary Number M1.R1.11.2170 4.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 4.3.
Applicable Code/Licensing Requirement WCAP-14572, Rev.1-NP-A, Supplement 2, Table 4.1-1, Examination Category R-A, Item Number R1.11, Fig.IWB-2500-8(c), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F The NRC authorized the inclusion of the RI-ISI program as an acceptable alternative to the ASME Code,Section XI requirements for ASME Code Class 1 piping welds, Examination Categories B-F and B-J and ASME Code Class 2 piping welds, Examination Categories C-F-1 and C-F-2 for the third ISI interval by letter dated June 12, 2002.
4.4.
Impracticality of Compliance Surface 1: Stainless Steel Pipe Surface 2: Stainless Steel Valve NPS: 2.0 inch Thickness: 0.436 inch During the ultrasonic examination of this weld, 37.5% coverage of the required examination volume was obtained. The limitations were due to the valve configuration that did not allow complete scanning from the valve side (S2).
Scanning requirements are described in 10CFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1). The aggregate coverage was calculated as follows:
600 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -
pipe) 600 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S2 - valve) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 50% coverage in one circ.
direction (S3 - CW) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 50% coverage in one circ.
direction (S4 - CCW)
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (50% + 0% + 50% +
50%)/4 = 37.5%
In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume C-Page 7 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 D-E-F. Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.
4.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No alternative examinations are planned for the weld during the current inspection interval. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect expected degradation mechanisms such as thermal fatigue cracking and stress corrosion crack initiating at the pipe inside surface.
Additionally, radiography has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
4.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 12/01/2011.
4.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number Ml.R1.11.2170 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1; Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 8 of 34
McGuire Relief Request I1-MN-001 5.0 Weld #1 BCSHX-SH-48 5.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 1 Heat Exchanger Tubesheet to Shell Weld, Weld #1 BCSHX-SH-48, Summary Number M1.C1.30.0005 5.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 5.3.
Applicable Code Requirement
IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-A, Item Number C1.30, Fig. IWC-2500-2, 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume E-F-G-H 5.4.
Impracticality of Compliance Surface 1: Carbon Steel Tube Sheet Surface 2: Carbon Steel Shell Diameter: 55.25 inch Thickness: 0.625 inch ASME Section XI, Appendix III, 111-4420 requires coverage of the examination volume in two beam path directions and Appendix III, 111-4430 requires scanning on the weld crown in two directions. Because of the design of this component, these requirements could not be met. The aggregate coverage was calculated as follows:
350 shear waves obtained 44.29% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -
tubesheet) 350 shear waves obtained 44.29% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
shell) 350 shear waves obtained 44.29% coverage in one circ. direction (S3 -
CW) 350 shear waves obtained 44.29% coverage in one circ. direction (S4 -
CCW)
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (44.29% + 44.29%
+44.29% + 44.29%)/4 = 44.29%
The limitations were caused by the design of the attached permanent hanger supports limiting scanning from any of the required four directions. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the heat exchanger would have to be redesigned to allow scanning in all directions, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume E-F-G-H. The achieved coverage did not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.
Page 9 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 5.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because there is no practical access for film placement.
5.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 12/01/2011.
5.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number Ml.C1.30.0005 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1; Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during periodic surveillance testing provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 10 of 34
McGuire Relief Request I 1-MN-001 6.0 Weld #2PZR-13 6.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2, Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Upper Head Weld, Weld #2PZR-13, Summary Number M2.B3.110.0003 6.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 6.3.
Applicable Code Requirement
IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item Number B3.1 10 Fig. IWB-2500-7 (a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I 6.4.
Impracticality of Compliance The Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle material is carbon steel and the Upper Head material is carbon steel. This weld has a diameter of 15 inches and a wall thickness of 2.35 inches.
Because of the weld configuration, the requirements of ASME Section V, Article 4, T-441.1.2(a), T-441.1.3, T-441.1.4, T-441.1.5 and t-441.1.6 could not be met.
The aggregate coverage was calculated from the following base and weld metal scan results:
Weld coverage using 350, 450& 600 shear waves for axial scans (S1, S2),
and 350 & 450 shear waves for circ. scans (CW, CCW) obtained 83.6%
coverage.
Base material coverage using 350, 450& 600 shear wave for axial scans (SI) and 350, 45 0and 600 shear waves for circ. scans (CW, CCW) obtained 70.555% coverage.
00 scan coverage obtained 81.95% coverage.
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (83.6% + 70.555% +
81.95%)/3 = 78.7%.
The limitation was caused by the weld taper configuration created by the attachment of the Safety/Relief nozzle to the Upper Head. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the Upper Head to Safety/Relief nozzle attachment weld would have to be redesigned, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage. The achieved coverage did not meet the acceptable criteria of this Code Case.
Page 11 of 34
McGuire Relief Request I I-MN-001 6.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because there is no practical access for film placement.
6.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 7/15/2014.
6.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number M2.B3.110.0003 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1; Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 12 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 7.0 Weld #2PZR-14 7.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2, Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Upper Head Weld, Weld #2PZR-14, Summary Number M2.B3.110.0004 7.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 7.3.
Applicable Code Requirement
IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item Number B3.110 Fig. IWB-2500-7 (a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I 7.4.
Impracticality of Compliance The Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle material is carbon steel and the Upper Head material is carbon steel. This weld has a diameter of 15 inches and a wall thickness of 2.35 inches.
Because of the weld configuration, the requirements of ASME Section V, Article 4, T-441.1.2(a), T-441.1.3, T-441.1.4, T-441.1.5 and t-441.1.6 could not be met.
The aggregate coverage was calculated from the following base and weld metal scan results:
Weld coverage using 350, 450& 600 shear waves for axial scans (S1, S2),
and 350 & 450 shear waves for circ. scans (CW, CCW) obtained 83.6%
coverage.
Base material coverage using 350, 450& 600 shear wave for axial scans (S1) and 350, 45 0and 600 shear waves for circ. scans (CW, CCW) obtained 70.555% coverage.
00 scan coverage obtained 81.95% coverage.
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (83.6% + 70.555% +
81.95%)/3 = 78.7%.
The limitation was caused by the weld taper configuration created by the attachment of the Safety/Relief nozzle to the Upper Head. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the Upper Head to Safety/Relief nozzle attachment weld would have to be redesigned, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage. The achieved coverage did not meet the acceptable criteria of this Code Case.
Page 13 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11 -MN-001 7.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because there is no practical access for film placement.
7.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 7/15/2014.
7.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number M2.B3.1110.0004 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1; Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 14 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 8.0 Weld #2PZR-15 8.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2, Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Upper Head Weld, Weld #2PZR-15, Summary Number M2.B3.1110.0005 8.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 8.3.
Applicable Code Requirement
IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item Number B3.110 Fig. IWB-2500-7 (a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I 8.4.
Impracticality of Compliance The pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle material is carbon steel and the Upper Head material is carbon steel. This weld has a diameter of 15 inches and a wall thickness of 2.35 inches.
Because of the weld configuration, the requirements of ASME Section V, Article 4, T-441.1.2(a), T-441.1.3, T-441.1.4, T-441.1.5 and t-441.1.6 could not be met.
The aggregate coverage was calculated from the following base and weld metal scan results:
Weld coverage using 350, 450& 600 shear waves for axial scans (S1, S2),
and 350 & 450 shear waves for circ. scans (CW, CCW) obtained 83.6%
coverage.
Base material coverage using 350, 450& 600 shear wave for axial scans (51) and 350, 45 0and 600 shear waves for circ. scans (CW, CCW) obtained 70.555% coverage.
00 scan coverage obtained 81.95% coverage.
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (83.6% + 70.555% +
81.95%)/3 = 78.7%.
The limitation was caused by the weld taper configuration created by the attachment of the Safety/Relief nozzle to the Upper Head. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the Upper Head to Safety/Relief nozzle attachment weld would have to be redesigned, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage. The achieved coverage did not meet the acceptable criteria of this Code Case.
Page 15 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 1 I-MN-001 8.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because there is no practical access for film placement.
8.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 7/15/2014.
8.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number M2.B3.1110.0005 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section Xl, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1; Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section Xl, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 16 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 9.0 Weld #2ACSHX-SH-48 9.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2, Exchanger Shell to Tubesheet Weld #2ACSHX-SH-48, Summary Number M2.C1.30.0006 9.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 9.3.
Applicable Code Requirement
IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category CA, Item Number C1.30 Fig. IWC-2500-2, 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume E-F-G-H 9.4.
Impracticality of Compliance The material is carbon steel. This weld has a diameter of 55.25 inches and a wall thickness of 0.625 inch.
ASME Section XI, Appendix III, 111-4420 requires coverage of the examination volume in two beam path directions. ASME Section XI, Appendix III, III 4430 requires scanning on the weld crown in two directions. The total aggregate percent coverage was calculated as follows:
450 shear waves obtained 23.4% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -
tubesheet) 450 shear waves obtained 23.4% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
shell) 450 shear waves obtained 23.4% coverage in one circ. direction (CW).
450 shear waves obtained 23.4% coverage in one circ. direction (CCW).
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (23.4% + 23.4% + 23.4% +
23.4%)/4 = 23.4%.
In order to obtain more coverage the welded supports would have to be removed to allow additional access. This is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume E-F-G-H. Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the criteria of this Code Case.
9.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because there is no practical access for film placement.
Page 17 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 9.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 7/15/2014.
9.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number M2.C1.30.0006 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1; Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during periodic surveillance testing provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 18 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-00I 10.0 Weld #2NC2FW39-1 10.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2, Nozzle to Pipe Weld #2NC2FW39-1, Summary Number M2.R1.11.0048 10.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 10.3.
Applicable Code/Licensing Requirement WCAP-14572, Rev.1-NP-A, Supplement 2, Table 4.1-1, Examination Category R-A, Item Number R1.11, Fig.IWB-2500-8(c), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F The NRC authorized the inclusion of the RI-ISI program as an acceptable alternative to the ASME Code,Section XI requirements for ASME Code Class 1 piping welds, Examination Categories B-F and B-J and ASME Code Class 2 piping welds, Examination Categories C-F-1 and C-F-2 for the third ISI interval by letter dated June 12, 2002.
10.4.
Impracticality of Compliance Surface 1: Stainless Steel Nozzle Surface 2: Stainless Steel Pipe NPS: 1.5 inch Thickness: 0.281 inch Scanning requirements are described in 10CFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1). The aggregate coverage was calculated as follows:
450 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -
nozzle) 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
pipe) 380 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 27.7 % coverage in one circ.
direction (S3 - CW) 380 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 27.7% coverage in one circ.
direction (S4 - CCW)
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (0% + 50% + 27.7% +
27.7%)/4 = 26.35%
In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume C-Page 19 of 34
McGuire Relief Request I1-MN-001 D-E-F. Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.
10.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No alternative examinations are planned for the weld during the current inspection interval. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect expected degradation mechanisms such as thermal fatigue cracking and stress corrosion crack initiating at the pipe inside surface.
Additionally, radiography has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
10.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 7/15/2014.
10.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number M2.R1.11.0048 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1; Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 20 of 34
McGuire Relief Request I -MN-001 11.0 Weld #2NC2FW40-11 11.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2, Nozzle to Pipe Weld #2NC2FW40-1 1, Summary Number M2.R1.11.0049 11.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 11.3.
Applicable Code/Licensing Requirement WCAP-14572, Rev.1-NP-A, Supplement 2, Table 4.1-1, Examination Category R-A, Item Number R1.11, Fig.IWB-2500-8(c), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F The NRC authorized the inclusion of the RI-ISI program as an acceptable alternative to the ASME Code,Section XI requirements for ASME Code Class 1 piping welds, Examination Categories B-F and B-J and ASME Code Class 2 piping welds, Examination Categories C-F-1 and C-F-2 for the third ISI interval by letter dated June 12, 2002.
11.4.
Impracticality of Compliance Surface 1: Stainless Steel Nozzle Surface 2: Stainless Steel Pipe NPS: 1.5 inch Thickness: 0.281 inch Scanning requirements are described in 10CFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1). The aggregate coverage was calculated as follows:
450 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -
nozzle) 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
pipe) 380 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 50% coverage in one circ.
direction (S3 - CW) 380 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 50% coverage in one circ.
direction (S4 - CCW)
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (0% + 50% + 50% +
50%)/4 = 37.5%
In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume C-D-E-F. Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.
Page 21 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11 -MN-001 11.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No alternative examinations are planned for the weld during the current inspection interval. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect expected degradation mechanisms such as thermal fatigue cracking and stress corrosion crack initiating at the pipe inside surface.
Additionally, radiography has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
11.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 7/15/2014.
11.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number M2.R1.11.0049 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1; Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 22 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 12.0 Weld #2NC2FW43-1 12.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2, Nozzle to Pipe Weld #2NC2FW43-1, Summary Number M2.R1.11.0050 12.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 12.3.
Applicable Code/Licensing Requirement WCAP-14572, Rev.1-NP-A, Supplement 2, Table 4.1-1, Examination Category R-A, Item Number R1.11, Fig.IWB-2500-8(c), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F The NRC authorized the inclusion of the RI-ISI program as an acceptable alternative to the ASME Code,Section XI requirements for ASME Code Class 1 piping welds, Examination Categories B-F and B-J and ASME Code Class 2 piping welds, Examination Categories C-F-1 and C-F-2 for the third ISI interval by letter dated June 12, 2002.
12.4.
Impracticality of Compliance Surface 1: Stainless Steel Nozzle Surface 2: Stainless Steel Pipe NPS: 1.5 inch Thickness: 0.281 inch Scanning requirements are described in 10CFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1). The aggregate coverage was calculated as follows:
450 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -
nozzle) a 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
pipe) 0 380 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 50% coverage in one circ.
direction (S3 - CW) 380 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 50% coverage in one circ.
direction (S4 - CCW)
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (0% + 50% + 50% +
50%)/4 = 37.5%
In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume C-Page 23 of 34
McGuire Relief Request I I-MN-001 D-E-F. Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.
12.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No alternative examinations are planned for the weld during the current inspection interval. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect expected degradation mechanisms such as thermal fatigue cracking and stress corrosion crack initiating at the pipe inside surface.
Additionally, radiography has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
12.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 7/15/2014.
12.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number M2.R1.11.0050 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1; Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 24 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 1I-MN-001 13.0 Weld #2NV2FW180-1 13.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2, Nozzle to Pipe Weld ID #2NV2FW1 80-1, Summary Number M2.R1.11.1566 13.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 13.3.
Applicable Code/Licensing Requirement WCAP-14572, Rev.1-NP-A, Supplement 2, Table 4.1-1, Examination Category R-A, Item Number R1.11, Fig.IWB-2500-8(c), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F The NRC authorized the inclusion of the RI-ISI program as an acceptable alternative to the ASME Code,Section XI requirements for ASME Code Class 1 piping welds, Examination Categories B-F and B-J and ASME Code Class 2 piping welds, Examination Categories C-F-1 and C-F-2 for the third ISI interval by letter dated June 12, 2002.
13.4.
Impracticality of Compliance Surface 1: Stainless Steel Reducer Surface 2: Stainless Steel Pipe NPS: 2.0 inch Thickness: 0.344 inch Scanning requirements are described in 10CFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1). The aggregate coverage was calculated as follows:
450 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -
reducer) 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
pipe) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 75% coverage in one circ.
direction (S3 - CW) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 75% coverage in one circ.
direction (S4 - CCW) 0 The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (0% + 50% + 75% +
75%)/4 = 50.0%
In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume C-D-E-F. Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.
Page 25 of 34
McGuire Relief Request I I-MN-001 13.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No alternative examinations are planned for the weld during the current inspection interval. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect expected degradation mechanisms such as thermal fatigue cracking and stress corrosion crack initiating at the pipe inside surface.
Additionally, radiography has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
13.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 7/15/2014.
13.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number M2.R1.11.1566 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1; Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 26 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 14.0 Weld #2NC2FW2-2 14.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2, Nozzle to Pipe Weld #2NC2FW2-2, Summary Number M2.R1.11.1730 14.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 14.3.
Applicable Code/Licensing Requirement WCAP-14572, Rev.1 -NP-A, Supplement 2, Table 4.1-1, Examination Category R-A, Item Number R1.11, Fig.IWB-2500-8(c), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F The NRC authorized the inclusion of the RI-ISI program as an acceptable alternative to the ASME Code,Section XI requirements for ASME Code Class 1 piping welds, Examination Categories B-F and B-J and ASME Code Class 2 piping welds, Examination Categories C-F-1 and C-F-2 for the third ISI interval by letter dated June 12, 2002.
14.4.
Impracticality of Compliance Surface 1: Stainless Steel Pipe Surface 2: Stainless Steel Nozzle NPS: 14.0 inch Thickness: 1.406 inch Scanning requirements are described in 10CFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1). The aggregate coverage was calculated as follows:
450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -
pipe) 450 shear waves obtained 5.6% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
nozzle) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 100% coverage in one circ.
direction (S3 - CW) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 100% coverage in one circ.
direction (S4 - CCW)
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (50% + 5.6% + 100% +
100%)/4 = 63.9%
In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume C-D-E-F. Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.
Page 27 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 14.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No alternative examinations are planned for the weld during the current inspection interval. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect expected degradation mechanisms such as thermal fatigue cracking and stress corrosion crack initiating at the pipe inside surface.
Additionally, radiography has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
14.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 7/15/2014.
14.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number M2.R1.11.1730 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1; Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 28 of 34
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 15.0 Weld #2NV2FW10-20 15.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2, Pipe to Flange Weld ID = 2NV2FWIO-20, Summary Number PSI 15.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 15.3.
Applicable Code/Licensing Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-i, Item Number C5.21 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F 15.4.
Impracticality of Compliance Surface 1: Stainless Steel Pipe Surface 2: Stainless Steel Flange NPS: 3.0 inch Thickness: 0.216 inch Scanning requirements are described in 10CFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1). The aggregate coverage was calculated as follows:
450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -
pipe) 450 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
flange) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 50% coverage in one circ.
direction (S3 - CW) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 50% coverage in one circ.
direction (S4 - CCW)
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (50% + 0% + 50% +
50%)/4 = 37.5%
In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the flange would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume C-D-E-F. Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.
Page 29 of 34
6 McGuire Relief Request I I-MN-001 15.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was inspected by radiography (RT) in order to meet Section III requirements, and found to be free of weld fabrication defects. A pre-service ultrasonic inspection was also performed as a baseline for future inservice (ISI) inspections, and was examined using procedure, equipment, and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. For future ISI inspections, RT is not a desired option because RT has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
15.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 7/15/2014.
15.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number PSI was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1; Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 30 of 34
a McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 16.0 Weld #2NV2FW180-46 16.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2, Pipe to Valve 2NV 1025, Weld #2NV2FW180-46, Summary Number PSI 16.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 16.3.
Applicable Code/Licensing Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-i, Item Number C5.21 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F 16.4.
Impracticality of Compliance Surface 1: Stainless Steel Valve Surface 2: Stainless Steel Pipe NPS: 4.0 inch Thickness: 0.237 inch Scanning requirements are described in 10CFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1). The aggregate coverage was calculated as follows:
450 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S1 - valve) 450 shear waves obtained 25% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
pipe) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 50% coverage in one circ.
direction (53 - CW) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 50% coverage in one circ.
direction (S4 - CCW)
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (0% + 25% + 50% +
50%)/4 = 31.25%
In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume C-D-E-F. Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.
Page 31 of 34
b McGuire Relief Request 11 -MN-001 16.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was inspected by radiography (RT) in order to meet Section III requirements, and found to be free of weld fabrication defects. A pre-service ultrasonic inspection was also performed as a baseline for future inservice (ISI) inspections, and was examined using procedure, equipment, and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. For future ISI inspections, RT is not a desired option because RT has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
16.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 7/15/2014.
16.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number PSI was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1; Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 32 of 34
4 b
McGuire Relief Request 11-MN-001 17.0 Weld #2NV2FW180-45 17.1.
ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2, Elbow to Valve 2NV 1025, Weld #2NV2FW180-45 Summary Number PSI 17.2.
Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 17.3.
Applicable Code/Licensing Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-i, Item Number C5.21 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F 17.4.
Impracticality of Compliance Surface 1: Stainless Steel Valve Surface 2: Stainless Steel Elbow NPS: 4.0 inch Thickness: 0.237 inch Scanning requirements are described in 10CFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1). The aggregate coverage was calculated as follows:
450 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S1 - valve) 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -
elbow) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 50% coverage in one circ.
direction (S3 - CW) 450 shear and longitudinal waves obtained 50% coverage in one circ.
direction (S4 - CCW)
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (0% + 50% + 50% +
50%)/4 = 37.5%
In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
The McGuire Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage of examination volume C-D-E-F. Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.
Page 33 of 34
4 A
McGuire Relief Request I1-MN-001 17.5.
Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was inspected by radiography (RT) in order to meet Section III requirements, and found to be free of weld fabrication defects. A pre-service ultrasonic inspection was also performed as a baseline for future inservice (ISI) inspections, and was examined using procedure, equipment, and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. For future ISI inspections, RT is not a desired option because RT has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
17.6.
Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on 7/15/2014.
17.7.
Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number PSI was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.
The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1; Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.
Duke has examined the weld/component to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment. Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke's position that the combination of examinations provide a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.
Page 34 of 34
Attachment A Weld Examination Data
A11ACHMENT A PASE OF~
Site/Unit: McGuire I 1 Summary No.:
M1.R1.11.0390 Workscope:
ISI UT Pipe Weid Examination Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
01853546 Outage No.:
MI-20 Report No.:
UT-10-135 Page:
1 of 6
Code:
199I2000 Addenda Cat./Item:
R-AIR1.11 Location:
Drawing No.:
MCFI-INCS3
==
Description:==
Nozzle to Pipe System ID:
NC Component ID: INCIF-3613-3192 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter:
1.40114.0/3S Limitations:
See attached sheet Start Time:
1031 Finish Time:
1120 Examination Surface:
Lo Location:
Inside E]
9.1.1.1 Outside []
Wo Location:
Surface Condition: AS GROUND Centerlhve of Weld Coupla lit:
ULTRAGELII Batch No.:
09325 I
II II I
Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Lutron Cal. Report No.:
Angle Used 0
45 45T 60 Scanning dB 39.7 39.7 55.9 Indication(s):
Yes []
No El Comments:
FC 08-04, 09-02, 09-08, 10-09 Serial No.:
MC CAL-10-3286 321 & 330 S
CRL 71.2 Scan Cover R0E32821 Surface Temp.:
72
-F age:
Upstream E Downstream R]
Cw 0 cCw 6 Results:
Accept El Reject 0 Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
Info E]
No Reviewed Previous Data:
you
411-%
Ultrasonic Indication Report SitelUnit:
McGulre I
1 Summary No.:
Workscope:
MI.RI.1 1.0390 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
01859546 Is' At1A*HMNI* A PAR*E.
OF 0
-F Outage No.:
MI-20 Report No.:
UT-10-135 Page:
2 of 6
Wo W"=*=
UCL IWI W2W Search Unit Angle:
60 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Lo Location:
g.1.1.1 0
& Piping Welds 0
Ferrltic Vessels
> 2-C Other MP Metal Path Wmax Distance From Wo To S.U. At Maximum Response RBR Remaining Back Reflection W1 Distance From Wo At Of Max (Forward)
L Distance From Datum W2 Distance From Wo At Of Max (Forward)
Comments:
NIA 1[2 T-L-Al
-ý- --
DATI r i
L Indication W
Forward Backward LI L
1L2 RBR Remarks Angle No.
Of Max Of Max Of Max or Max Of Amp.
DAC W
75 2.3 2.60.
Int.
NIA Geometry Examiner Level,.
Sinture Date Revie Signature Da Mulrhead, Barry A.
312512010 q-.
Dt Examiner Level 11-N *S a re Date Site Review Signature Date
- Hot, Jacob 3/25/2010 Other Level NIA,(/
tignature Date ANII Review Signature Date NIA_
1Jy~
1;
~
t L{ IV- /
6Z
0© (Th A11ACHMENT A\\
P A SF-:
0 F 2A DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID:
1NC1F-3613-3092 Item No:
Ml.R1.11.0390 remarks:
0 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration E] LIMITEDSCAN
[i 1 0
2 Z
I L] 2 Li cw L] ccw FROM L N/A to L NIA INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond ANGLE:
0 0 0 45
[ 60 other FROM 0
DEG to 360 DEG Ei NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION
[-
LIMITED SCAN E]1 5 2 E] I r-2 E] cw (]
ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:
Li 0 L] 45 Li 60 other FROM DEG to DEG E] NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION r-LIMITED SCAN I 1
[E) 2 1 [-] 2 E] cw E-ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to.
ANGLE:
E] 0 C] 45 Li 60 other FROM DEG to DEG EI NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION r-LIMITED SCAN E]
5 E] 2 L1 [] 2 EL cw [-
ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached 4
[0 yes El-No ANGLE:
5 0 0 5 [] 60 other FROM DEG to DEG es-,N Prepared By:.
Barry Muirhead Level:
Date:
03/25110 Sheit *2A3, of,
34',.
Reviewed By:
Date:
Authorized Inspector:
Date:.
-3j~jie--- I
-/
.I 6',
aLw Supplem al Report A1IACHMHT A Report No.:
GT-10-135 Page:
4 of S
Summary No.: MI.R1.11.0390 Examiner: Mulrhead, Barry A.
A Examiner: Horls, Jacob Other. NIA Level:
II-N Level:
II-N Level:
NIA Reviewer: Moss, Gary-1, Site Review: NIA ANII Review: Jerome Swan Date: 3/31/2010 Date:
Date: 41412010 Comments: Ind. #1 Is a geometric reflector from the weld root configuration. Used 600 shear and 60"RL, confirmed using previous data.
Sketch or Photo:
SupplemeQtI Report Summary No.: MI.R1.11.0390 Examiner Mulrhead, BarryA.
Level:
I-N Examiner: Holis, Jacob Level:
N/-N Other: NIA 4VLevel:
NIA Report No.:
Page:
Reviewer: Moss, Gary A
if laO"P*
Site Review: NA ANII Review: Jerome. Swan PAGr.5aF 2-*
UT-10-135 5
of 6
Date: 3/3112010 Date:
Date:
414W2010 Comments:
Sketch or Photo: 51 !
"2i Toi.-J Am@,c. orf inkIf ABtO0: 7.o'x Y" (SI) ABSo/.
YY 6W=100Y.
Le,.~
of Sp~~L4-C-
IP
I¶>~ DukeDoter tEnergy Site/Unit: McGuire I 1
~
Summary No.:
MI.RI.11.0390 Workscope:
ISI mination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
POI-UT-2 C
01859546 Outage No.:
M1-20 Report No.:
UT-10-135 Page:
6 of 6
45Sdon Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 100.000
% Leng@, X.
% LengiX
% Lengb~X
% LengthtX 100.000 100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 1
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 2
% volume of length / 100 =
100.000
% total for Scan 3
% volume of length / 100 =
100.000
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by$ scans a 100.000
% total fo"45 deg g.,rdgSL- _
(to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
%LenjO X
100.000
% LengfiX
% LengthX 9/% L.enh X 50.000 0.000
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
50.000 0.000
% total for Scan 1
" total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Percent comolete coverane Add totals for each scan required and dkide by # of scans to determine; 62.500
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
4 Date:
d/.-7/O
AIIACHMENT A U
e x
n 7
OF ULT Vessel Examination Site/Unit: McGuire /
1 Summary No.:
Mi.Ct.20.00t17 Workscope:
I3l Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-3630 1
01659546 Outage No.:
MI-20 Report No.:
UT-10-137 Page:
I of 7
Code:
199812000 Addenda Cat./item:
C-AIC1.20 Location:
Drawing No.:
MC481N-1554-01.02
==
Description:==
Head To Flange System ID:
NV Component ID: 1ELDHX-IO-FLG Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter: 0.75/9.SISS-CS Limitations:
Yes. See attached limitation sheet Start lime:
1040 Finish Time:
1120 Examination Surface Lo Location:
Inside [
Too Dead Center Outside M Wo Location:
Surface Condition: AS GF Centerline of Weld tOUND Couplant:
ULTRAGEL IH Surface Temp.:
64
'F Batch No.:
09325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Fluke Cal. Report No.:
Angle Used 145 45T 60 Scanning dB T
Indication(s):
Yes []
No [
Serial No
.OCCUA33090 CAL-10-334. 335. 336 & 337 60T Scan Coverage:
Upstream []
Downstream []
CW M ccW W)
Comments:
6O"RL used for supplemental coverage
- C8 l9id-S23.2dbISS slde-54.0db Axial scan
- CS slde4T.UdbiSS side-61.0db Clrc. Scan
Accept []
Reject []
Info F-Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No FC 09-01, 09-06, 10-10 Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes
AT 1ACHMEN1 PA-1!r A
DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID:
IELDHX-HD-FLG Item No:
MI.C1.20.0017 remarks:
0 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Vent pipe.
E] LIMITEDSCAN
-- 1 0
2 1 E-] 2
[D cw Z ccw FROM L 26.75" to L "30.50" INCHES FROM WO
+3.5" to Beyond ANGLE:
El 0 Z 45 0 60 other FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG 0
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Inlet connection ill LIMITED SCAN E-1 Z
2 0
1 I[1 2 0 cw 01 ccw FROM L 0.25" to L 4.25" INCHES FROM WO
+0.9" to Beyond ANGLE:
L] 0 0 45
[] 60 other FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG 0
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Outlet conection E] LIMITED SCAN El1 02 0I 1
-2
[
cw Z ccw FROM L 11.5" to L 16.5" INCHES FROM WO
+0.9" to Beyond ANGLE:
[0 0 [
45 0 60 other FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG 0
NO SCAN LI LIMITED SCAN SURFACE 10ED2 BEAM DIRECTION 1 I-J 2 0 cw 0 ccw Draw Pipe FROM L 16.5" to L 18.5" ANGLE:
[3 0 ED 45 0 60 other INCHES FROM WO
+3.5" to Beyond FROM N/A DEGto N/A DEG Sketch(s) attached 0
yes
[I No Matthew.
03/20 I
SSheet
- 2
C0 5abdl Supplemetital Report Report No.:
Page:
ATIACHMENT A PA6E---,,S Q.F ;'-7q UT.-i 0.137 3
of 7
Date:
Date:
Date:
-io Summary No.: M1.C1.20.0017 Examiner-Hendrickson, Level:
il-N Examiner. G: ebel,.adM.
Level:
ti-N Other. NIA Level:
NIA Reviewer.
Site Review:
ANIi Review:
(1 I
Comments: Weld # iELDHX-HD-FLG Sketch or Photo:
("-*
/_.
/39,w' 4~~~
~
=*" L.*
.5".
.3V,,
7.-
2-IL-AL*CC -. 5 it1
£9f~W410t-W7q i//;rS//A
-36, "
ro774' iVllml
~zevl,Y
.3. 7-S=*
2A4-11i el,4 Co'§-
IIVZ-E-
/6, 7*-5 -ý 30, 'Y/0O
- 1. / Z 7 fk iL-L Se-ALF-
Supplem6ral Report Al LACHMEN1 A P AE
/ '0 0 F 2'4 Report No.:
UT-1O-137 Page:
4 of 7
Summary No.: MI1.C.20.0017 Examiner: Hendrickson, Matthew Examiner: GrebD M.
Other: NIA Level:
II-N Level:
li-N Level:
NIA Reviewer Site Review:
ANII Review:
Date:-
Date:
Date: I
-i 0 Comments: WELD# 1ELDHX-HD-FLG Sketch or Photo:
o ~
%K~r/t$2~Acld
- ýLA,3(x5-e-,
AI.
(,4-3SVr~A wV
~4~~ArJ2: ~
U?~T~A ~
A
% I COVkAC1E
.75?
rULL SC-ALC-.
NOW Suppleme~iall Report ATIACHMENT A PAG6-'F'// OF ýL/
Report No.:
UT-10-137 Page:
S of 7
Summary No.: MI.C1.20.0017 Examiner. Hndrlckson, Matthew Level:
lI-N Examiner: Griebel, David M.
Level:
li-N Other: NIA Level:
NIA Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
Date:
Date:
Date: #-'//
(/
Comments: WELD # 1ELDHX-HD-FLG I
Sketch or Photo:
I-/ 0jTLa*r P-LA'-)(xE. -S 14"-, -1 6 N
I t
V-5 FeomSv 5a 0
-M-,rA-,g4S (z5le 5)(
75x 75)
.56kA b3f Y
/
37
- jc-u~ ZL 5IA L,5
C>
Supplememaal Report Report No.:
Page:
A11ACHMENT A P A n-Eý/ M 0F 2*
uT.10-137 6
of T
Summary No.: MI.C1.20.0017 Examiner: Hendrickson, Matthew evel:
i1-N Examiner< G,,,,e,,..
Level:
,.-N Other:. NA Level:
NIA Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
Date:
Date:
Date:
Z" Y-/0 Comments: WELD # IELDHX-HD-FLG Sketch or Photo:
5' D IZ J
=L-Ak~xV, -S I
~1
'7' F4l-L -SA L*
-Duke Determi
,Gner~y Site/Unit:
McGuire I
1 Summary No.:
M1.Cl.20.0017 Workscope:
ISI nation of Percent Coverage for r Examinations - Vessels Procerhwe:
NDE-3630 Outage No.:
M1-20 Procedure Rev.:
I Report No.:
UT-10-137 Work Owre No.:
01859546 Page:
7 of 7
0 den Planar Scan
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for 0 deg S5can Scan 1 S1.600
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length / 100=
51.600
% total for Scan I Scan 2 51.600
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
51.600
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 51.600
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
51.600
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 51.600
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
51.600
%/ total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
51.600
% total for 45 deg Other dLg 4
Scan 1 48.400
% Length X 79.100
% volume of length / 100 =
38.284
% total for Scan 1 Scan 2 48.400
% Length X 37.300
% volume of length / 100 =
19.053
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 48.400
% Length X 58.200
% volume of length / 100 =
28.169
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 48.400
% Length X 58.200
% volume of length /100 =
28.169
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
28.169
%toWal for 45 deg S
(jl..*
Percent complete coverane T 169 Add totals for each angle and scan required and divide by-# of angles to determine; 71?. 761 1
% Total for complete exam Supplemental coverage maybeachieved by use of other angles / methods. When used, the coverage for volume not obtained with angles as noted above shall be calculekd and added to the total to provide the percent total for the complete examination.
Site Field Supervisor K
~
ae Date:
At 1ACHMENT A PA5E Iq0F ;7 q Site/Unit: McGulre 1
Summary No.:
MI.Ri.11.2170 Workscope:
ISt UT Pipe Weid Examination Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NOE-600 17 01859546 Outage No.:
M1-20 Report No.:
UT-10-110 Page:
1 of 4
Code:
1998/2000 Addenda Cat./Item:
R-A/RI.11 Location:
Drawing No.:
MCFI-INV53
==
Description:==
VALVE TO PIPE System ID:
NV Component ID: INVIFW53-27 Size/Length:
N/A Thickness/Diameter:
0.436I2.01SS Limitations:
See attached sheet Start Time:
1121 Finish Time:
1141 Examination Surface:
Inside LI Outside [J Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.1.1.1 We Location:
Centerlne of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
09325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Lutron Serial No.:
MCNDE32824 Surface Temp.:
65
-F Cal. Report No.:
CAL-10-310, 311. & 312 Angle Used 0
45 45T 60 70 Scanning dB 47.F 34.4 49.3 Indication(s):
Yes [
No []
Scan Coverage:
Upstream LI Downstream 21 CW []
CCW R]
Comments:
FC 08-03 Results:
Accept []
Reject {J Info LI Initial Section XI Exam Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
No Examiner Lvel I.N re Date Reviewer
/1/
Signature Date Mauldin. Larry E.
312312010 Moss, Gary
/
3/25/2010 Exmnr Lee aeSieRve Signature Date Bull, W. Keith 3/2312010 N/A Other Level NIA Signatufe Date ANII Review Signature Date NIA Jerome Swan 41412010
At 1ACHMENTA P A 6E7 OF 2H DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID:
I NVI FW53-27 Item, No:
M1.RL.11.2170 remarks:
] NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to valve 1NV35-A
-l LIMITED SCAN E--I ED 2 0
1
[-1 2 Z cw (Z ccw configuration FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO 0.25" to Beyond ANGLE:
E) 0 0 45
[D 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG
[L NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E] LIMITED SCAN CI I E] 2 F-1 1
[-i 2 [] cw C] ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:
0 0 E] 45 L] 60 other FROM DEG to DEG Li NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION LiLIMITED SCAN
[-
I E-2 i1 E 2 i]
cw 0 ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:
E] 0 El 45 Li 60 other FROM DEG to DEG LI NO SCAN F1 LIMITED SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 0ii 0I2 L-I 1 1] 2 [i cw [L ccw FROM L
_to.L 4
INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached ANGLE:
00 0 5
[
yes L
No other FROM DEGto DEG 4
.0 b,
C 5-sOMoww Suplemklrtal Report Suppem RepReport No.:
Page:
ATTACHMENT A UT-1 0-110 3
of 4
Date: 3-.2,*Io Date:
Date: -'
Summary No.: M1.RI.11.2170
/I Examiner: Mauldin, Larry E.
Examiner: Bull W. Keith Other: NIA__
Level:
11-N Level:
I1-N Level:
NIA Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
je21AI~~
Comments:
-Sketch or Photo:
VPaLvL'~ INV\\L75ixf I
I Si ?J~
Ex~M f2~2ei~
f~i:~ 64 xOD. 1, 4
.2 1 =.2.sqmJ
'I SI sc~.iu. V Joo ~
IN V Duke Deteri
=,. ikVEnergy.
Site/Unit: McGuire /
I Summary No.:
MI.R1.11.2170 Workscope:
ISI mination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-600 17 01859546 Outage No.:
MI-20 Report No.:
UT-10-110 Page:
4 of 4
45 d1g Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4
% Length X Length X 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Len thX 50.000 50.000
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 1
% total for Scan 2 50.000
% total for Scan 3 50.000
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by# scans =
50.000
% total fbr 45 deg Oher l
(to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X 50.000 0.000
% Length X 0.000
% Length X
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
50.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% volume of length /100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 1
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
/ total for Scan 4 Percent gomolete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 37.500
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:.
Oý.,
., -a,-- --,
Allý Date:
ATTACHMENT1 A UT Base MetL-.
_amination PA6E 0rO 9 Site/Unit: McGufra /
1 Summary No.:
MI.R1.11.2170 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-640 5
01559546 Outage No.:
NIA Report No.:
BOP-UT-10-217 Page:
1 of 2
Code:
193812000 Addenda Cat./item:
R-A/R1.1 I Location:
Drawing No.:
MCFI-1NV53
==
Description:==
Valve to Pipe System ID:
NV Component ID: 1NVIFW53-Z7 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter:
0.436"i2.01SS Limitations:
None Start Time:
1115 Finish Time:
1120 Examination Surface:
Inside E]
Outside Sd Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.1.1.1 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
09325 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Lutron Serial No.:
MCNDE32824 Surface Temp.:
65
-F Scanning dB:
38.9 Cal. Report No.:
CAL-10-313 Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two Ind.
Loss Remarks No.
Back Wall Full Screen Li W1 W2 MP LM W1 W2 MP L2 WI W2 MP NRl Comments:
NIA Results:
Accept R]
Reject []
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
Info E-Initial Section XI Exam Reviewed Previous Data:
C
.Mikad Supplemelital Report Report No.:
Page:
A11ACHMENT f\\
BOP-UT-10-217 2
of 2
Date: 3-..S-/o Date:
Date:
Summary No.: MI.Ri.11.2170 J7 Examiner: Mauldin, Larry E.A&/,(*""'fi/
[ic Level:
U-N Examiner: BullW. Keith Level:
I-N Other:
NIA Level:
NIA Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
)Jhu1 /I~
Comments:
Sketch or Photo:
4-I4 LVJ34 9 -
AIIACHmwH PASE 2 0 OF29-SDuke LVEnergy.
Site/Unit: McGuire I 1
Summary No.:
MI.C1.30.0005 Workscope:
ISl UT Vessel Examination Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-3630 I
0185§545 Outage No.:
M1-20 Report No.:
UT-10-103 Page:
1 of 5
Code:
199812000 Addenda Cat/Item:
C-A/C1l.30 Location:
Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.06-25
==
Description:==
Shell To Tubesheet System ID:
NS Component ID: 1BCSHX-SH-48 SizefLength:
NIA Thickness/Diameter: 1.6255,2$01CS Limitations:
Yes Start Time:
1355 Finish Time:
1433 Examination Surface:
Inside E]
Outb Lo Location:
9.2.1 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
D.A.S Cal. Report No.:
Angle Used j
0 45 45T 60 Scanning dB Indication(s):
Yes E]
No V Comments:
Scan @ 50.5db due to signal to noise ratio.
side W1 Wo Location:
Serial No.:
Surface Condition: AS GROUND Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
09325 MCNDE32795 Surface Temp.:
73
'F CAL-10-289 60T 35 HK Scan Coverage:
Upstream RJ Downstream RJ CWRJ CCW RJ Results:
Accept []
Reject IJ info []
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No FC 09-01, 09-05, 10-10 Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes i
Date IReviewer J,-
t
/-*
0 Supplemern tal Report PA6E"ZlOF Report No.:
UT-10-103 Page:
2 of 5
Summary No.: MI1C1.30.0o05 Examiner Mulrhead, Barry A-Level:
li-N Exam Leepe, Winfred C.
- X-Level:
Il-N Other: Hollls, Jacob, Level:
Il-N Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
f J
Date: 9-0-.2 Date:
Date:-1-/ -/
O zi -
Comments:
I RC!S y
i
- SH - -I-;
10
-,ILEACI F~:
(,&
I T,5 ýakeS
ATIACHMENr A P AS F,--2.7 0F 211 DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT ComponentlWeld ID:
1BCSHX-SH-48 Item No:
M1.C1.30.0005 remarks:
0D NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 16" due to permenant Cl LIMITED SCAN 0
1 0
2 0
1 0 2
ED cw 0 ccw support hanger FROM L 12.0" to L 28.0" INCHES FROMWO S1+1.5 to S2+.5 ANGLE:
0 0 0 45 E] 60 other 35 FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG 0
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 12" due to permenant support
[3LIMITED SCAN E I Z 2 01 1
2 0 CW 0 CCW hanger FROM L 38.0" to L 50.0" INCHES FROMWO S1+1.5 to $2+.5 ANGLE:
E] 0 Q 45 [] 60 other 35 FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG 0
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 12" due to permenant support
-LIMITED SCAN 01 0
2 01
[D 2 Z cw [ ccw hanger FROM L 60.0" to L 72.0 INCHES FROMWO S1+1.5 to S2+.5 ANGLE:
[] 0 El 45 0l 60 other 35 FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG 0
NO SCAN
.Fl LIMITED SCAN SURFACE 01 02 BEAM DIRECTION 01 Z
2 0 Cw 0 c
15" due to permenant support hanger FROM L 81.0" to L 96.0" 4
ANGLE:
E) 0 0 5 060 ot INCHES FROM WO S1+1.5 to S2+.5 r 35 FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG Sketch(s) attached 0
yes M No he APheet. 4-q-~-
of 5 Inspector:
ii
/.
Date:
ff 4 -
/~ 1r C't
K>
ATIACHMENT P AS -2S OF L
DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID:
I BCSHX-SH-48 Item No:
M1.C1.30.0005 Remarks:
0 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 9" due to permanent support LJLIMITED SCAN 01
[
2 Z1 2 Z cw E] ccw hanger FROM L 106.0" to L 115.0" INCHES FROM WO S1+1.5 to S2+.5 ANGLE:
0 0 E] 45 El 60 other 35 FROM NIA DEG to N/A DEG 0
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 16' due to permanent support LILIMITED SCAN (01 02 0
1 Z
2 0 cw (Z
ccw hanger FROM L 125.0" to L 141.0" INCHES FROM WO S1+1.5 to S2+.5 ANGLE:
0 0 El 45 5] 60 other 35 FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG ED NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 10" due to permanent support El LIMITED SCAN 01 2
01 N
2 0 cw ccw hanger FROM L 150.0" to L 160.0" INCHES FROM WO S1+1.5 to S2+.5 ANGLE:
[] 0 [] 45 E] 60 other 35 FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG
[9 NO SCAN
[j LIMITED SCAN SURFACE 0102 BEAM DIRECTION 0
1 Z
2 0 cw 0 ccw 7.5" due to permanent support hanger FROM L 170.0" to L 2.5" 4
ANGLE:
[] 00 5]
5 E5 60 o
INCHES FROMWO S1+1.5 to S2+.5 r 35 FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG Sketch(s) attached Z
yes IJ No the Sheet 4-5 inspector:
(1,.* J -.
Date*
62
/
h I.Duke a~'Eeirgy Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Vessels Site/Unit:
McGuire
/
I Summary No.:
MI.Cl.30.0005 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
HDE-3630 I
011859S45 Outage No.:
Ml-20 Report No.:
UT.10-103 Page:
5 of 5
0 dea Planar Scan
% Length)(
% volume of length / 100 =
0/% total for 0 deg 45 dea Scan 1
% Length X_
% volume of length / 100 =
Scan 2
% Length X_
% volume of length / 100 =
Scan 3
% Length)(
% volume of length /100 =
Scan 4
% Length)( X%
volume of length/100 =
% total for Scan 1
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scam a
% total for 45 deg Other dog 350 Scan 1 44.290
% Lengj
)(
100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
44.290
% total for Scan 1 Scan 2 44.290
% LenrN X 100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
44.290
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3 44.290
% Length)(
100.000
% volume of length /100 =
44.290
% total for Scan 3 Scan 4 44.290
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length 1 100 =
44.290
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scam 44..200
% total for
- 35.
deg Percent complete coveraoe Add totals for each angle and scan required and divide by # of angles to determine; 44.290
% Total for complete exiam Note:
Supplemental coverage may be achieved by use of other angles / methods. When used, the coverage for volume not obtained with angles as noted above shag be calculated and added to -the total to provide the percent total for the complete examination, C" __
Site Field Supervisor:
D
,ate:
-L23
,=
7701 01
Attachment B Weld Examination Data
WA11HMENT 0 PASE I OF 9q Site/Unit:
Summary No.:
Workscope:
McGuire 1 2
M2.B3.110.0003 1SI UT Vessel Examination Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-820 4
01345833 Outage No.:
M2-19 Report No.:
UT-09-097 Page:
1 of I
Code:
199812000 A Cat./Item:
B-DIB3.110 Location:
Drawing No.:
MCM 2201.01-15
==
Description:==
NOZZLE to HEAD System ID:
NC Component ID: 2PZR-13 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter:
2.35 115.000 Limitations:
Yes Start Time:
1340 Finish Time:
1549 Examination Surface:
Inside LI Outside [
Surface Condition: As Manufactured Lo Location:
9.2.3 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
08125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Fluke Serial No.:
OCQUA330O9 Surface Temp.:
84
-F Cal. Report No.:
CAL-09-2S9,260, 261, 262, 263, 264 & 265 Angle Used 0 145 45T 60 60T 35 Scanning dB 40.1 53 53 66.6 66.6 64 Indication(s):
Yes []
No 5Z Scan Coverage:
Upstream WJ Downstream []
CW []
CCW R]
Comments:
60RL scanning db - q.5 Jake Ross Level II )
09107/2009 Results:
Accept F]
Reject W Info E]
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes
Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Head % of Coverage Item No. : M2.B3.110.0003 Weld No.: 2PZR-13 Weld Coverage Scan S1 S1 S2 S2 Cw Cw CCw CCw Angle 450 600 350 450 350 450 350 450
% Coverage Obtained 95.13 93 45.89 34.65 100 100 100 10o 668.67 Total 668.67 + 8 =
83.6
% Coverage Base Material Coverage S1 Cw & CCw 350,450&600 350,450&600 Total 78.01 63.1 141.11 70.555 81.95 141.11 ÷2=
% Coverage
% Coverage 00 Scan Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00 + 3 78.7 Inspector/ Date:
2LeV(
,Or
% Coverage Page _L of __
C-7 3C-
AI1ACHMENT t DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID:
2PZR - 13 Item No:
M2.B3.110.0003 remarks:
[
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration L]LIMITED SCAN D1 "2
l 1 02 cw ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROMWO
+0.1" to Beyond ANGLE:
0 0 E] 45 E] 60 other 35 FROM 0 DEG-to 360 DEG 0
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration E-LIMITED SCAN E1 I n 2 i--c 1 Ej 2
[1" cw 0 ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO
+0.5" to Beyond ANGLE:
0 0 EU 45 M 60 other FROM 0
DEG to 360 DEG
[)
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration
-LIMITED SCAN i1 2
I
-I 2Ucw E-ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM Wo
-0.2" to Beyond ANGLE:
U 0 F1 45 (E 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG I
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration U LIMITED SCAN
[j 1 0
2 F3 1 U-2 U-1 cw UI ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO
-0.6" to Beyond Sketch(s) attached 4
ANGLE:
Ul 0 El 5 U3 60 other 35 FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG yes U No Prepared By:
Steve Dean Level:
ii Date:
09/09/09 Sheet 2
Of IZ Reviewed By:*
Date:
07 Authorized Inspector:
Date-I/
U I
A1. ~C3 DUKE ENERGY COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Summary #:
2PZR-13 Component ID M2.B3.1 10.0003 remarks:
[
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle Configuration L1 LIMITED SCAN 1
0 2
S1 Ei 2 0 cw 0 ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO 1.2 to Beyond ANGLE:
E] 0 0 45 Z 60 other 35 FROM o DEG to 360 DEG Z
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle Configuration
[-]
LIMITED SCAN
[E 1
0 2
E5 1 [
2 Z cw 0 ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO 1.5 to Beyond ANGLE:
0 0 [] 45 5] 60 other FROM o
DEG to 360 DEG NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION El] LIMITED SCAN
[-
1 5-2 51 1L012
] cw 0 ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:
E] 0 E] 45 nl 60 other FROM DEG to DEG 5
NO SCAN Li LIMITED SCAN SURFACE 5--1 El-2 BEAM DIRECTION 5
1 [5 2 E5 cw [I ccw FROM L to L ANGLE:
5 0 [] 45 E] 60 other INCHES FROM WO to FROM DEG to DEG Sketch(s) tttached
!p yes
~No Prepared By:
Steve Dean 9/09/09 Reviewed By:
L.f v
l
Pressurizer Safety / Reliet Nozzle to Head Total Area Weld & Base Material AITACHM4ENT B PASE 5 OF 91 Item No.: M2.B3.110.0003 Weld No. : 2PZR-13 Total Weld Area = 3.29 sq. in.
Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 3.87 = 7.46 sq. in.
Total Exam Area = 3.59 + 3.29 + 3.87 = 10.75 sq. in.
Surface 2 Nozzle Area= 3.29. sq. in.
Scale 1"= 2" Inspector / Date 1: - 01' Page q of i..
Clad
Pressurizer Safety / RelierNozzle to Head Weld Material Coverage -Axial Scans ATAtRI1Ad3 MAE IOF Item No. : M2.B3.11O.0003 Weld No. : 2PZR-13 100% Coverage 350, 450, 600 Scans CW, CCW from Surface 1 Total Weld Coverage 45' from Surface 1 = 3.13 / 3.29 x 100 = 95.13%
Total Weld Coverage 600 from Surface 1 = 3.06 / 3.29 x 100 = 93.0%
Surface 2 Nozzle 450-350 Area 6O° = 3.06 sq. in.
Scale V" = 2" Inspector/Date:
q-q-0O Page q-of /___
Clad
Al 1ACHMEY 13 P A GE 7 OF q Pressurizer Safety / RelierNozzle to Head Weld Coverage - Axial & Circumferential Scans Item No.,: M2C.B3.110.0003 100% Coverage 350, 450, & 600 Scans CW, CCW, from Surface 2 Total Weld Coverage 350 from Surface 2 = 1.51 / 3.29 x 100 =45.89%
Total Weld Coverage 450 from Surface 2 = 1.14 / 3.29 x 100 = 34.65%
Weld No. : 2PZR-13 Surface 2 Nozzle Scale 1" = 2" Inspector I Date :
f-7",O7 Page L of 11-Clad
Pressurizer Safety / RelierNozzle to Head Weld Material Coverage - 60 RLAxial Scan PAW`Bý'
of ?Y Item No.: M2.B3.110.0003 Weld No.: 2PZR-13 Surface 2:
Nozzle Inspector/Date:
Page _7 of Iz.
600 RL Scale 1P =2" Clad
Pressurizer Safety / Relief Nozzle to Head Weld Coverage - 60° RLAxial Scan w ktow E F A 6E QF7 Item No.: M2C.B3.11O.0003 Weld No. : 2PZR-13 Surface 2 Nozzle 60ORL Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date:
?
Page e of Clad
A11ACHNET 8 PASL,/O OF 99 Pressurizer Safety / Reliet Nozzle to Head Base Material Coverage -Axial Scans Item No. : M2.B3.110.0003 Weld No. : 2PZR-13 Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 2.23 = 5.82 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 5.82 / 7.46 x 100 = 78.01 %
Surface 2 Nozzle Area =23sq. in.
Scale 1" =2" Inspector/Date:
1-7-01 Clad Page q of j:
Pressurizer Safety / Reliet Nozzle to Head Base Material Coverage - 600 RLAxial Scan AIIACHMENT 8 PAME //
OF 9q Item No.: M2.B3.110.0003 Weld No. : 2PZR-13 Surface 2 Nozzle 60 RL° Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date :
1-Y-07 Page jo of tz.
Clad
Pressuzer Safe
/Re/let-Nozzl to Head Base Material Coverage-Circunferential Scans A11At0JN-, 8 PAOE)ý Z Item No-: Nn-113.110-0003 Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 1.12 = 4.71 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage -- 4.71 / 7.46 x 100 = 63.1%
Weld No. : 2PZR-13 450, 350, 60, & 6o0 RL Scale 1" =2" Clad Inspector/ Date: ý0 Page /.I of_
Pressurizer SafetY / ReliedNozzle to Head 00 Scan Coverage Item No.: M2.B3.110.0003 Weld No. : 2PZR-13 0' Scan Total Area = 8.81 sq. in, Total 0' Scan Coverage = 8.81 / 10.75 x 100--81.95 %
Surface 2 Nozzle 0o Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date :
f-I -M Clad Page _a of _jL
AIACHMER1 PASE I-F LýJ Site/Unit:
Summary No.:
Workscope:
UT Vessel Examination McGuire /
2 M2.83.110.0004 ISI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-820 4
Outage No.:
M2-19 Report No.:
UT-09-099 Page:
1 of I
018456833 Code:
199812000 A Cat./Item:
B-D0B3.110 Location:
Drawing No.:
MCM 2201.01-015
==
Description:==
NOZZLE to HEAD System ID:
NC Component ID: 2PZR-14 Size/Length:
N/A Thickness/Diameter:
2.35115.000 Limitations:
Yes Start Time:
1410 Finish Time:
1542 Examination Surface:
Inside El Outside [
Surface Condition: As Manufactured Lo Location:
9.2.3 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
08125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Fluke Serial No.:
OCQUA33090 Surface Temp.:
84
-F Cal. Report No.:
CAL-09-259. 260. 261, 262, 263, 264 & 265 Angle Used 0
45 45T 60 60T 35-Scanning dB 40.1 53 53 66.6 66.6 64 Indication(s):
Yes El No []
Scan Coverage:
Upstream W]
Downstream i]
CW []
CCW [
Comments:
60RL scanning db 8 5 Jake Ross Level II F 4
09/0712009 Results:
Accept E]
Reject R]
Info ER Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level 11-N
,*ature.
Date Review eOj.
Signature Date Leeper. Winfred C.
9/712009
/o-
-o Examiner Level li-N ijoatur-e-4 Date Site Review VSignature.
Date Dean, Steven 9/7/2009 Other Level l-iN II.n a
Kure Date AI.I Review Signature Date Ellis 11. Kenneth R.
9/712009,-A j
c-C
Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Head % of Coverage Item No. : M2.B3.110.0004 Weld No.: 2PZR-14 Weld Coverage Scan S1 S1 S2 S2 Cw Cw CCw CCw Angle 450 600 350 450 350 450 350 450
% Coverage Obtained 95.13 93 45.89 34.65 100 100 100 100 668.67 Total 668.67 +8 =
Base Material Coverage 83.6
% Coverage S1 Cw & CCw 350,450&600 350,450&600 Total 78.01 63.1 141.11 70.555 81.95 141.11 +2=
% Coverage
% Coverage 00 Scan Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 0' + 3 78.7 J9
'*120 f Inspector / Date :
.~Z?
~,
% Coverage Page /L of -2
A11AC~HENT B PA6E /4 OF v DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID:
2PZR - 14 Item No:
M2.B3.110.0004
%remarks:
[
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration
[-
LIMITED SCAN
[0 1
[J 2 i1 0
2 cw Llccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO
+0.1" to Beyond ANGLE:
E] 0 E] 45 0 60 other 35 FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG
[
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration FL LIMITED SCAN ED1 l 2 E-D 1
2 [-] cw L-ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO
+0.5" to Beyond ANGLE:
E] 0 [D 45 E] 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG
[j NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration Li LIMITED SCAN L]1 0
2 0
1
[-i 2
[Li cw
[i-ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO
-0.2" to Beyond_
ANGLE:
E] 0 El 45 N 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG
[
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration L] LIMITED SCAN 1
Ei 2 0
- 1-2 [- cw [: ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO
-0.6 to Beyond Sketch(s) attached 4
Z yes No ANGLE:
L] 0 (D 5 Li 60 other 35 FROM DEG to DEG Prepared By:
Steve Dean Level:
II Date:
09/09/09 Sheet 4__ of
/.,2 Reviewed By:
Date:
AtozeInpco:
-Date:
L s-1LE
/C-F-Y-
1/"
5
/
A11ACHMENT PA5E 1,iOF DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID:
2PZR - 14 Item No:
M2.B3.110.0004 remarks:
[
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration E] LIMITED SCAN i-1I 2 2 E] I E2 cw ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO 1.2 to Beyond ANGLE:
E] 0 [A 45
[D 60 other 35 FROM 0
DEG to 360 DEG
[
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration Li LIMITED SCAN EL 1 B) 2 L-1 [-L 2 El cw E ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO 1.5 to Beyond ANGLE:
E) 0 E] 45 E] 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG E] NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION L-LIMITED SCAN El 1 F-2 r-I Er 2 E] cw [] ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:
U 0 E] 45 E3 60 other FROM DEG to DEG El NO SCAN U1 LIMITED SCAN SURFACE EU1 0-2 BEAM DIRECTION
-1
[] 2 U cw
[U] ccw FROM L to L 4
INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached ED yes ANGLE:
U 0 EU 5 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG
-1 No
(-I,
AIA1AHt4ENT J3 q,6E OF Pressurizer Safety I RelietNozzle to Head Total Area Weld & Base Material Item No. : M2.B3.110.0004 Weld No. : 2PZR-14 Total Weld Area = 3.29 sq. in.
Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 3.87 = 7.46 sq. in.
Total Exam Area = 3.59 + 3.29 + 3.87 = 10.75 sq. in.
Surface 2 Nozzle Ar
= 3.29 sq. in.
Scale I" =22" Inspector / Date Page / of 129 Clad
Pressurizer Safety / RelietrNozzle to Head Weld Material Coverage -Axial Scans A11ACOM~4 5B PASE Q~i F
Item No.: M2.B3.11O.0004 Weld No. : 2PZR-14 100% Coverage 350, 450, 600 Scans CW, CCW from Surface 1 Total Weld Coverage 450 from Surface 1 = 3.13 / 3.29 x 100 = 95.13%
Total Weld Coverage 60- from Surface 1 = 3.06 / 3.29 x 100 = 93.0%
Surface 2 Nozzle 450.
Area 60 = 3.06 sq. in.
Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date: ;
q-1-01 Page 5 of /;
Clad
P A 6E.; 1F 9q Pressurizer Safety / RelietNozzle to Head Weld Coverage -Axial & Circumferential Scans Item No.: M2.B3.110.0004 100% Coverage 350, 450, & 600 Scans CW, CCW, from Surface 2 Total Weld Coverage 350 from Surface 2 = 1.51 / 3.29 x 100 =45.89%
Total Weld Coverage 450 from Surface 2 = 1.14 / 3.29 x 100 = 34.65%
Weld No. : 2PZR-14 Surface 2 Nozzle Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date :
"-I Page (_ of I?
Clad
AIIACHMENT 13 PASEmý OF 9qI Pressurizer Safety / Reliet-Nozzle to Head Weld Material Coverage - 600 RLAxial Scan Item No.: M2.B3.110.0004 Weld No. : 2PZR-14 Surface 2 Nozzle 600 RL Scale I" = 21 Inspector / Date :
- q. Y, 0q Page I of/ 2 Clad
AIIACHMENT 23 P A 6E F q9L/
Pressurizer Safety / RelietNozzle to Head Weld Coverage - 600 RLAxial Scan Item No.: M2.B3.110.0004 Weld No. : 2PZR-14 Surface 2 Nozzle 600RL
&V:
Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date :
d 1-?,0?
Page F of Z-?
Clad
Pressurizer Safety / Relief Nozzle to Head Base Material Coverage -Axial Scans A11ACHMENT 13 PAGEz?3 OF 0/~
Item No.: M2.B3.11O.0004 Weld No. : 2PZR-14 Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 2.23 5.82 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 5.82 / 7.46 x 100 = 78.01 %
Surface 2 Nozzle Area= 2.23*N. in.
%~
('-.
Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date : 2 q" q" O Page ?of_2 Clad
AMACHMENT 6 PASEaL!ý OF q Pressurizer Safety / Reliel-Nozzle to Head Base Material Coverage - 600 RLAxial Scan Item No.: M2.B3.110.0004 Weld No. : 2P'ZR-14 Surface 2 Nozzle 60 RL°.
Scale 1" = 2" Inspector/ Date:
Of-Clad Page /0 of 1-O
AHIACHMENT PAGE:
0 F c)ý1 Pressurizer Safety / RelidcNozzle to Head Base Material Coverage - COrcumferential Scans Item No.: M2.B3.110.0004 Weld No. : 2PZR-14 Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 1.12 = 4.71 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 4.71 / 7.46 x 100 =63.1%
Surface 2 Nozzle 450,350, Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date:
Page // of/A Clad
A11A.Ci-MENT S Pressuri"zerSafe~y / Relie;Nozzle to Head 00 Scan Coverage Item No.: M2.B3.110.0004 Weld No. : 2PZR-14 00 Scan Total Area = 8.81 sq. in.
Total 0' Scan Coverage = 8.81 / 10.75 x 100 = 81.95 %
Surface 2 Nozzle 00 Scale lt ~2t Inspector / Date :*
"-?-Oc Page Z/ý of /2 Clad
ATTACHMENT 6 PAGE 2 7 OFc7 Site/Unit:
Summary No.:
Workscope:
UT Vessel Examination McGuire /
2 M2.B3.110.0005 IsI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-820 4
01845833 Outage No.:
M2-19 Report No.:
UT-09-098 Page:
1 of I
Code:
199812000 A Cat./Item:
B-DIB3.110 Location:
Drawing No.:
MCM 2201.01-015
==
Description:==
NOZZLE to HEAD System ID:
NC Component ID: 2PZR-15 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter:
2.35 / 15.000 Limitations:
Yes Start Time:
1354 Finish Time:
1541 Examination Surface:
Inside El Outside WJ Surface Condition: As Manufactured Lo Location:
9.2.3 We Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
08125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Fluke Serial No.:
OCQUA33090 Surface Temp.:
84 oF Cal. Report No.:
CAL-09-259, 260, 261. 262. 263, 264 & 265 Angle Used 0
45 145T 60 60T1 35 Scanning dB 40.1 53 53 66.6 66.6 64 Indication(s):
Yes []
No WJ Scan Coverage:
Upstream Wj Downstream W]
CW []
CCW 66 Comments:
60RL scanning db - 8A.5 Jake Ross Level 11 r 2, /1--~-
09/0712009 Results:
Accept j Reject R]
Info L_
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes
Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Head % of Coverage Item No. : M2.B3.110.0005 Weld No.: 2PZR-15 Weld Coverage Scan S1 S1 S2 S2 Cw Cw CCw CCw Angle 450 600 350 450 350 450 350 450
% Coverage Obtained 95.13 93 45.89 34.65 100 100 100 100 668.67 Total 668.67 +8 =
83.6
% Coverage Base Material Coverage S1 Cw & CCw 350,450&600 350,450&60° Total 78.01 63.1 141.11 70.555 81.95 141.11 +2=
% Coverage
% Coverage 00 Scan Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 0' + 3 78.7
.4 Inspector / Date :
e22
% Coverage Page L-of 1z KJ
/
A11ACHMENT P A 6E;2_q QF DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT ComponentlWeld ID:
2PZR - 15 Item No:
M2.B3.110.0005 remarks:
E NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration E] LIMITED SCAN
[
1
(]
2 E]I 2 F-cw [] ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO
+0.1 to Beyond ANGLE:
C- 0 C] 45 E] 60 other 35 FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG f] NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration
-]LIMITED SCAN 1
12 F-I E
2
[:] cw [] ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO
+0.5 to Beyond ANGLE:
E] 0 N 45 U] 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG
] NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration U LIMITED SCAN U1 (D 2 0
1 U] 2 U-] cw U:] ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO
+0.2 to Beyond ANGLE:
EU 0 U] 45 0 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG
[
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration U
LIMITED SCAN I
M 2 N;c 1 f] 2
[:_ cw F ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO
-0.6 to Beyond Sketch(s) attached 4
ANGLE:
U] 0 Z 5 U] 60 other 35 FROM 0
DEG to 360 DEG
] yes U
No Prepared By:
Steve Dean Level:
I, Date:
09/091200/
Sheet 2
of Reviewed By:
Date:
Authorized Inspector:
Date- '
j.
I!.
I
A11ACKMLBI 5 P A 6E_30 oFý?
DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID:
2PZR - 15 Item No:
M2.B3.110.0005 remarks:
0 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration ILIMITED SCAN 1i-] 02 L1 [-
2 Z cw ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO 1.2 to Beyond ANGLE:
El 0 0] 45 0 60 other 35 FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG M NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle configuration
[JLIMITED SCAN F"1 02 2
[
Lc 1 E--c 2 ED cw ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO 1.5 to Beyond ANGLE:
0D 0 E] 45 E] 60 other FROM 0
DEG to 360 DEG E-NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION
-1 LIMITED SCAN C[] 1 E1 2 E] I E-2 [] cw
-] ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:
E] 0 (j 45 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG I
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION
-LIMITED SCAN I-1 E
22 l-1 i2r]
cw ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached ANGLE:
0] 0 5
60 other FROM DEGto DEG I yes E-No Prepared By:
Steve Dean Level:
II Date:
09/09/2009 Sheet of ZZ ReviewedAuthorized Inspector:
Date I'da ~~
~
~
__M
-Athrie Inspector.,
-~--.~-v I'
~~
?q
/
AIIAUIMENTH PA6E ý,J) OF?
Pressurizer Safety / ReliefNozzle to Head Total Area Weld & Base Material Item No. : M2.B3.110.0005 Weld No. : 2PZR-15 Total WeldArea= 3.29 sq. in.
Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 3.87 = 7.46 sq. in.
Total ExamArea = 3.59 + 3.29 + 3.87-= 10.75 sq. in.
Surface 2 Nozzle Ama = 3.29 sq. im Scale V= 2" Inspector / Date :"
i--
Page -/ ofj Clad
Pressurizer Safety / RelietNozzle to Head Weld Material Coverage - Axial Scans A11ACHMER1 ~
PAGE~~jF~
Item No.: M2.113.110.0005 Weld No. : 2PZR-15 100% Coverage 350, 450, 600 Scans CW, CCW from Surface 1 Total Weld Coverage 450 from Surface 1 = 3.13 / 3.29 x 100 = 95.13%
Total Weld Coverage 60- from Surface 1 = 3.06 / 3.29 x 100 =93.0%
Surface 2 Nozzle Area 6(=
0 -3.06 sq. in
)
Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date:
Page - of.
Clad
A11ACHMENT !
P A6 OF 9 Pressurizer Safety / Relief Nozzle to Head Weld Coverage -Axial & Circumferential Scans Item No. : M2.B3.110.0005 100% Coverage 350, 450, & 600 Scans CW, CCW, from Surface 2 Total Weld Coverage 35' from Surface 2 = 1.51 / 3.29 x 100 =45.89%
Total Weld Coverage 45' from Surface 2 = 1.14 / 3.29 x 100 = 34.65%
Weld No. : 2PZR-15 Surface 2 Nozzle Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date:
Page _a of 1:
Clad
IIALOERT S
P A6
,3, 0F '7'-Y Pressurizer Safety / ReliefNozle to Head Weld Material Coverage - 600 RLAxial Scan Item No.: M2.B3.110.0005 Weld No.: 2PZR-15 Surface 2 Nozzle 600 RL Scale I" = 2" Inspector / Date :
9-7-07 Clad Page ý of 1,4
A11ACHMENT 3D P A 6 E,
5 F
Pessurizer Safety / Relie Nozze to Head Weld Coverage - 600 RL Axial Scan Item No.: M2.B3.110.0005 Weld No. : 2PZR-15 Surface 2 Nozzle 600 RL V
Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date :
Y-7-40 Clad Page _8 of/ 2
Pressurizer Safety / Relief Nozzle to Head Base Material Coverage - Axial Scans ATTACHMENT S PA6E GoF : B/
Item No.: M2.B3.11O.0005 Weld No. : 2PZR-15 Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 2.23 = 5.82 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 5.82 / 7.46 x 100 = 78.01 %
Surface 2 Nozzle 450.
Arf =2,23 sq. hn.
V-Scale I" = 2" Inspector / Date :
Page I of_2 Clad
Pressurizer Safety / ReliefNozzle to Head Base Material Coverage -60 RLAxial Scan P ABE ~7 V/
Item No.: NMM.3lO.0005 Weld No. : 2PZR-15 Surface 2 Nozzle 60 RLb" Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date:'
?-1-01 Page._. of _
Clad
A11ACHMEW E
P A 6E3 OF'5 Pressurizer Safet / Reliel Nozzle to Head Base Material Coverage - Circumferential Scans Item No.: M2.B3.110.0005 Weld No. : 2PZR-15 Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 1.12 =4.71 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 4.71 / 7.46 x 100 = 63.1 %
Surface 2 NozdJe 450, 350, 600, & 600 RL Scale 1" =2" Inspector / Date: :l-f:-o*,
Clad Page _/L ofI2
Presuizer Sf ei' Pressuzer Safe0 / RelieSNozzle to Head 00 Scan Coverage A11AMMhEP\\
P A 6E3 QF Item No.: M2.B3.11O.0005 Weld No. : 2PZR-15 O0'Scan Total. Ara =.8 1 sq. in.
Total 00Scan Coverae = 8.81 /10.75 x 10 =81-95%
Surface 2 Nozzle 00 Scale 1" =2" Inspector / Date:,,A Clad Page L-Zof/1ý2
AIIACHMWtI.
MAE 4/ OF 9t(
Site/Unit: McGuire 1 2
Summary No.:
M2.Cl.30.0006 Workscope:
ISI UT Vessel Examination Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-3630 1
01845739 Outage No.:
M2-19 Report No.:
UT-09-037 Page:
1 of 4
Code:
199812000 A Cat./Item:
C-AICt.30 Location:
Drawing No.:
MCM 1201.06-025
==
Description:==
SHELL to TUBESHEET System ID:
NS Component ID: 2ACSHX-SH-48 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter:
0.625/55.250 Limitations:
Yes Start Time:
1102 Finish Time:
1125 Examination Surface:
Inside E]
Outside W]
Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.2.1 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
08125 Temp. Toot Mfg.:
Fluke Serial No.:
OCQUA33O00 Surface Temp.:
80 oF Cal. Report No.:
CAL-09-184. CAL-09-185 Angle Used 0
45 45T 60 60T Scanning dB I
I Indication(s):
Yes LI No []
Scan Coverage:
Upstream R)
Downstream [J CW []
CCW [I Comments:
- Transducer.5" diameter 45.5db; Transducer.25" diameter 51.2 db Results:
Accept LI Reject W]
Info E]
FC 09-01 Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level 111.
Srg-e
~
Date Revie Signature Date Leeper, Winfred C.
Z1020 01_____________________
Examiner Level III."
Signaturp.
Date Site Review Signature Date Muirhead, Barry A.
~
~8/20/2009 Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review V
Signature Dal I.- NI
-J7/
t
pwm$
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Vessels Site/Unit:
McGuire 1
2 Summary No.:
M2.C1.30.0006 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NOEo3630 01 01845739 0 deg Planar Scan
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 Outage No.:
M2-19 Report No.:
UT-09-037 Pag.
Z of 4
% total for 0 deg 45 de1 Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 23.400
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length I 100 =
23.400
% total for Scan 1 23.400
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length /100 =
23.400
% total for Scan 2 23.400
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length I 100 =
23.400
% total for Scan 3 23.400
% Length X 100.000
% volume of length/ 100 =
23.400
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
23.400
% total for 45 deg Other deo Scan 1
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 1 Scan 2
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 2 Scan 3
% Length X
% volume of length /100 =
I% total for Scan 3 Scan 4
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by 9 scans
% total for deg Percent complete coverage Add totals for each angle and scan required and divide by # of angles to determine; 23.400
%Total for complete exam Note:
Supplemental coverage may be achieved by use of other angles I methods. When used, the coverage for volume not obtained with angles as noted above shall be calculated and added to the total to provide the percent total for the complete examination.
Site Field Supervisor.
JIL Date:
C_____,__
-4
A11ACHMENT E PASEI4)2F 7j DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT ComponentlWeld ID:
2ACSHX-SH-48 Item No:
M2.C1.30.0006 remarks:
Z NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION LIMITED SCAN 0 1 N
2 0
1 Z 2
0 cw 0 ccw These areas are not FROM L 0-10" to L 0+10" INCHES FROM WO S1+1.5 to S2+1.5 accessible to prep the ANGLE:
Z 0 Z 45
[] 60 other FROM DEG to.
DEG weld, due to weld supports
[
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 100% of weld examined FD LIMITED SCAN
[1 0
2 0
1 0 2
Z cw Z ccw in areas that were scanned.
FROM L 0+20" to L 0+65.5" INCHES FROMWO S1+1.5 to S2+.5 ANGLE:
Z 0 Z 45
[] 60 other FROM DEG to DEG
[
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Total coverage -
2.3q%
24-Ii LIMITED SCAN Z I 2
Z 1 Z 2 Z cw M ccw FROM L 0+77.5" to L 0+95.5" INCHES FROMWO S1+1.5 to S2+.5 ANGLE:
Z 0 O 45 F-60 other FROM DEG to DEG NO SCAN D
LIMITED SCAN SURFACE Z
[IZ2 BEAM DIRECTION
[1 Z] 2 Z cw 9 ccw Sketch(s) attached FROM L 0.105.5" to L 0+155" 4
ANGLE:
Z 0 Z 5 E] 60 o
INCHES FROMWO S1+1.5 to S2+.5 Z
yes El No ier FROM DEG to DEG Prepared By:
Winfred 1 08/20/09 It- *..3*-4
Supplemeh-rdl Report Report No.:
Page:
ATIACHMENT.,
UT-09-037 4
of 4
Date:
Date:
D a t e:-A
ý- 0-=/,
Summary No.: M2,CI.30.0006 Examiner: Lepr inrdC Level:
Il-N Examiner: Mulrhead, Barry A.
Level:
i1-N Other:
NIA Level:
NIA Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
Az~,
A 00-7/j, Comments:
Sketch or Photo:
-~
- r T~
T-
~V7Y I
.4
-4 r
~
~
1-
-4
~T7Ti7 I
I I...
I I.
i~j
-I.---
.-.~--.*--I---~- --
I,.*..,.,-..
AIIACHMENT 8 PAGE ýqOF 99 tCEnery.
Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
M2.!
Workscope:
UT Pipe Wela Examination 2
R1.11.0048 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
Outage No.:
M2-19 Report No.:
UT-09-091 Page:
1 of a
ISl 01845833 Code:
199812000 Addenda Cat./Item:
R-A/R1.11 Location:
Drawing No.:
MCFI-2NC39
==
Description:==
Pipe to Nozzle System ID:
NC Component ID: 2NC2FW39-1 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter: 0.281 11.51SS Limitations:
See Limitations Report Start Time:
1305 Finish Time:
1325 Examination Surface:
Inside Li Outside V Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.1.1.4 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
08125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
D.A.S Serial No.:
MCNDE32833 Surface Temp.:
80
-F Cal. Report No.:
CAL.09-249, CAL-09-250, & CAL-09-251 Angle Used 0
45
.45T160 38T 70 Scanning dB 49.8 64.0 60.9 Indication(s):
Yes F]
No WJ Scan Coverage:
Upstream V Downstream E]
Comments:
FC 08-01. 08-04, 09-02 Results:
Accept E)
Reject IJ Info [D Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level I-N Signatur Date Review"r.
.P Signature Date Tucker, David K.
912112009 AVC Examiner Level II-N Signature Date Site Reiew U
Signature Date N Koster, Rickey 9/21/2009 D
Other Level NIA, Sinature Date ANII Review SignatureDate NIA 2.- -
ILI
AITACHMENT 13 FPA 6E r4j 0F 47 Circumferential Scan Impingement Angle Calculation (ID/OD ratio must equal or exceed 45*)
OD = 1.90" ID = 1.90"- (2 X.281") = 1.338" ID/OD = 1.338"/1.90" =.704 = Sin 44.77*
Calculation to determine needed impingement angle ID/OD x sin 60° =.704 x sin 600 =.610 = 37.60 Use 38° for circ. scan Inspector / Date 51/e) -?
Page 2 of 8
P A 6E '14, 0F 9//
DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID:
2NC2FW-39-1 Item No:
M2.R1.11.0048 remarks:
} NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle Configuration El LIMITED SCAN 1
[:7 2
-l1 0
2 El cw El ccw FROM L N/A to L NIA INCHES FROM WO
.5" to Beyond ANGLE:
El 0 9 45 [] 60 other FROM 0
DEG to 360 DEG (0
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle Configuration
[1 LIMITED SCAN I
[g 2 1 [_1 2 [
cw El ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO
.4" to Beyond ANGLE:
E] 0 [3 45
[] 60 other 70 FROM 0
DEG to 360 DEG NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle Configuration ElLIMITED SCAN EIl 1 2
l1 E 2
E cw 0 ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO
.35 to Beyond ANGLE:
El 0 [] 45 El 60 other 38 FROM 0
DEG to 360 DEG El NO SCAN El LIMITED SCAN
.SURFACE El1
[12 BEAM DIRECTION El I El 2 [E cw El ccw Sketch(s) attached FROM L to L 4
INCHES FROM WO to Z} yes
[:1 No ANGLE:
[10 El 5
F1 60 other FROM DEG to DEG yes ElNo
{
M W-Supplemen-tal Report AI IA HMENT PA6E 1-7 aF*q Report No.:
UT-09-091 Page:
4 of 8
Summary No.: M2.R1.11.0048 ExaminerD K
Examiner: Koster, Rickey Other: NIA Level:
II-N Level:
II-N Level:
NIA Reviewer:
e Site Review:
ANII Re view:
Date:
Date:
Date?/z7
?
Comments: Area of Interest - S1 Nozzle 43Cp:
- o9;*, " /
- J, /./,vz-Sketch or Photo: Z:\\UT\\lDDEAL\\ProfileLlne2.jpg 17 i i i=
i IILi
PAM.
Supplemenrtal Report A11ACHMENT B PAME ýO OF -9 Report No.:
UT-Og-O91 Page:
5 of 8
Summary No.: M2.R1.11.0048 Examiner: Tucker, David K.
Examiner: Koster, Rickey Other:
N[A Level:
I-N Level:
1i-N Level:
NIA Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
Date: Z-zF-e)
Dale:
Date:/
ao,*-9 Comments: S1 Axial Scan Sketch or Photo: Z:\\UTlUDDEAL\\ProfileLine2.jpg
,57 A/azem
- 2g
(~h Supplemerntal Report A11ACHMENT 3 P A 6't J OF 9q4t Report No.:
UT-09-091 Page:
6 of 8
Summary No.: M2.RI.11.0048 Examiner: Tucker, David K.
Examiner: Koster, Rickey Other: NIA Level:
l1-N Level:
11-N Level:
N/A Reviewer-:,la Site Review: U ANII Review:
Date:
Date:
Comments: S2 Axial Scan z
z (1019)
C Sketch or Photo: Z:\\UTnlDDEALUProfiteLfne2.jpg
.5'/ //nel-c-,
5z 7/j 0
,5C',vz r
A.
Supplemental Report AI1IAC.HMENT PASE 50 OFg'4 Report No.:
UT-09-091 Page:
7 of 8
Summary No.: M2.RI.11.0048 Examiner: Tucker, David K.
Examiner: Koster, Rickey Other:
NIA Level:
1i-N Level:
1l-N Level:
NIA Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
L Date:
Date:
Comments: CW, CCW Circ. Scan A 6 C 0, 01,/m A, 110,4
,13,&I Sketch or Photo: Z:\\UT'\\lDDEAL\\ProfiIeUne2.jpg 56,,,ý11- -T/,/? (10)
2~rz' I
I i
i I
I K
0 I
- 1 A4~-
I I
ý 1A
[.
- e' 9 p
V 3ge
S=
Site/Unit: Mct ft% C.:
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Gulre 1 2
Summary No.:
M2.RI.11.0048 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
01845833 Outage No.:
M2-1 9 Report No.:
UT-09-091 Page:
8 of 8
45 den Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X 0.000
% volume of length /100 =
50.000
% volume of length 1100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length 1100 =
0.000
% total for Scan 1 50.000
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
25.000
% total for 45 deg Other det -
38 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
100.000
% Length X 27.700
% volume of length 1 100 =
100.000
% Length X 27.700
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan I
% total for Scan 2 27.700
% total for Scan 3 27.700
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 26.350
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
6.
Date:
AI1ACHMEHiT 8 PA6EfS2OF 9L4 Site/Unit: McGuire /
2 Summary No.:
M2.R1.11.0049 Workscope:
IS!
UT Pipe Wela Examination Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
0184533 Outage No.:
112-19 Report No.:
UT-09-090 Page:
1 of 2
Code:
1998/2000 Addenda Catu/item:
R-A/R1.11 Location:
Drawing No.:
MCFI-2NC40
==
Description:==
Pipe to Nozzle System ID:
NC Component ID: 2NC2FW40-11 Size/Length:
W_ _
_A Thickness/Diameter:
0.2111/1.SISS Limitations:
See limitation sheet Start Time:
0517 Finish Time:
0852 Examination Surface:
Inside []
Outside []
Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.2.3 We Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULIRAGEL N Batch No.:
08125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Fluke Serial No.:
OCQUA33090 Surface Temp.:
73 iF Cal-Report No.:
CAL-09-246, CAL-09-247, CAL-09-248 Angle Used 0
45 45T1 60 70+7 38 Scanning dB 41.9 60.5 37.5 Indication(s):
Yes []
No []
Scan Coverage:
Upstream Sd Downstream E]
CW []
CCW sa Comments:
FC 08-01, 08-04, 09-02 Results:
Accept U]
Reject V]
Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes
Item No. M2.RI.11.0049 Weld No. 2NC2FW40-11 Axial Scan Coverage 450 Shear 450 Shear Pipe - S2 700 Shey Nozzle-Si A /
Coverage Claimed = 50%/
irc. Scan Coverage Pipe - S2 1 3 80Shear~..
Nozzle-Si
,r, v. 1.1 1 1. -
Im Coverage Claimed = 50%
Scale: 1"= 1"
% Coveraige Calculations S 1 =Nozzle=
0%
(0% of the length x 0% of the volume)
S2 = Pipe 50%
(100% of the length x 50% of the volume)
S3 = CW
=
50%
(100% of the length x 50% of the volume)
S4 = CCW 50%
(100% of the length x 50% of the volume)
Total
= 150 / 4 = 37.5 % Aggregate Coverage hispector / Date: _______
f__ I____If r--4 PageZ of 2
A11ACHMENT 13 MAE 5 OF 3LJ ft2Dke cEneWgy Site/Unit: McGuire /
2 Summary No.:
M2.R1.11.0050 Workscope:
ISI UT Pipe Welo Examination Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
01845833 Outage No.:
M2-19 Report No.:
UT-09-057 Page:
1 of I
Code:
199812000 Addenda Catiltem:
R-A/R1.11 Location:
Drawing No.:
MCFI-2NC43
==
Description:==
Pipe to Nozzle System ID:
NC Component ID: 2NC2FW43-1 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter: 0.28111.5018S Limitations:
Yes - See attached limitation relplo Start Time:
1013 Finish Time:
1115 Examination Surface:
Lo Location:
Inside []
9.2.3 outside W Wo Location:
Surface Condition: AS GR Centerline of Weld
~OUND Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
08125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Fluke Serial No.:
OCOUA33090 Surface Temp.:
Cal. Report No.:
CAL-09-229. CAL-09-231, CAL-09-232 Angle Used 0
45 45T 60 70 38 Scanning dB 53.2 66.5 44.3 Indication(s):
Yes IZ No W Scan Coverage:
Upstream R]
Downstream []
Comments:
FC 08&1, 08-04,09-02 Results:
Accept E]
Reject WI Info E]
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes 75 0F CW9~
CCW Sa
~Ls~
L~J~
~=~L.fl
~
-~uJ CD Item No. M2.Rl.11.0050 Weld No. 2NC2FW43-1 Axial Scan Coverage Pipe-S2 Nozzle-S1 Coverage Claimed = 50%
Cim. Scan Coverage Pipe - S2 380 Shear Nozzle-SI f/1 *..' ',*.'.::!*.'"<
I-IC Coverage Claimed = 50%
I Scale: 1' = 1"
% Coverage Calculations S I Nozzle=
S2 = Pipe =
S3=CW
=
S4 =CCW
=
Total
=
0%
(0% of the length x 0% of the volume) 50%
(100% of the length x 50% of the volume) 50%
(100% of the length x 50% of the volume) 50%
(100% of the length x 50% of the volume) 150 / 4 = 37.5 % Aggregate Coverage Inspector / Date:
Pag.*
Page -L of ý.
A11ACKMENT 3 P A 6 E _, 0 F ý"-
DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID:
2NC2FW43-1 Item No:
M2.R1.11.0050 remarks:
LI NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle Configuration SLIMITED SCAN r]1
[2
[*
1 [:] 2 [-] cw E] ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO CL to
.5 ANGLE:
El 0 [9 45 Dl 60 other FROM 0
DEG to 360 DEG Z
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle Configuration
[LIMITED SCAN
[Z 1 r2 El-1 2 [] cw [-1 ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond ANGLE:
El 0 [
45 El 60 other 70 FROM 0
DEG to 360 DEG N
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Nozzle Configuration El LIMITED SCAN i1 E 2 1 iEl 2 cw 9 ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond ANGLE:
0 [] 45 [] 60 other 38 FROM 0
DEG to 360 DEG El7 NO SCAN El LIMITED SCAN SURFACE
[l1 El-2 BEAM DIRECTION 1E 1 El 2 El cw El cw FROM L to L 4
INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached Z
yes El No ANGLE:
Ml 0 []
5 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG I
I
UT Base Metal Lamination PA6E57 UF Site/Unit: McGuire 1 2
Summary No.:
M2.R1.11.1566 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-640 Workscope:
BOP 5
01845739 Outage No,:
NIA Report No.:
BOP-UT-09-140 Page:
1 of 2
Code:
1998/2000A Cat./Item:
R-AIR1.11t Location:
Drawing No.:
MCFI-2NV180
==
Description:==
REDUCER TO PIPE System ID:
NV Component ID: 2NV2FW180-1 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter:
.34412"ISS Limitations:
None Start Time:
0913 Finish Time:
0918 Examination Surface:
Inside D Outside P]
Surface Condition:
AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.1.1.1 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
08125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Fluke Serial No.:
OCQUA33090 Surface Temp.:
97
°F Scanning dB:
52.4 Cal. Report No.:
CAL-09-199 Id.
Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two Loss Remarks No.
Back Wall Full Screen LI W1 W2 MP LM W1 W2 MP L2 Wi W2 MP NRI Comments:
NIA Results:
Accept R]
Reject L-J Info f__
Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
Yes Reviewed Previous Data:
NO Examiner Level II-N Sign re Date Reviewer Signature Date Dean, Steven,-
812612009 Barry Muirhead 9 /91412009 Examiner Level I1-N Date Site Review Signature Date Ellis 11, Kenneth R.
812612009 NIA Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date NIA Jerome Swan 912412009 (J.- /
1 7 Duke
ýOlnerqy.
Supplemental Report Report No.:
Page:
AIIACHMENT 1 PAGES-OF 9V BOP-UT-09-140 2
of 2
Date:
O. F'/-
07 Date:
Date:~Z~
Summary No.: M2.Ri.11.1566 Examiner: Dean, Steven Examiner: Ellis H Kenneth R.
Other: NfA Level:
II-N Level:
II-N Level:
N/A Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANUI Review:
&ýP_go,/AAý Comments: WELD: 2FW180-1 Sketch or Photo: Z:\\UlIT)DEAL\\ProfiIeLine2.jpg I
I I
I I
fij I
P A 6 E st F 5'9 Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
M2.I Workscope:
R11.111.11566
'SI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
01845739 Outage No.:
M2-19 Report No.:
UT-09-042 Page:
1 of Code:
199812000 A Cat./item:
R-A/IRI.1I Location:
Drawing No.:
MCFI-2NV180
==
Description:==
Reducer to Pipe System ID:
NV Component ID: 2NV2FW180-1 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter:
0.344/2.01SS Limitations:
None Start Time:
1447 Finish Time:
1500 Examination Surface:
Inside []
Outside WJ Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.1.1.1 We Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
08125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
Fluke Serial No.:
OCQUA33090 Surface Temp.:
97 0F Cal. Report No.:
CAL-09-197 & CAL-09,198 Angle Used 0
45145T160 70 Scanning dB 41.4 41.4 63.5 Indication(s):
Yes D]
No VJ Scan Coverage:
Upstream [
Downstream []
CW []
CCW []
Comments:
Limited Exam Results:
Accept E]
Reject W Info []
Initial Section Xl Exam Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
..".oi
Report No: UT-09-042 Page Z of Summary No:
M2.R1.11.1566 Pipe OD = 2.5" Circumference = 7.85" Area examined axially on Surface 1 = 0%
Area examined axially on Surface 2 = 50%
Area examined circumferentially CW = 75%
Area examined circumferentially CCW = 75%
Total area covered = (0 + 50 + 75 + 75) +4 = 50.0%
Examiner:
James J. Mc Ardle III Level:
III UT Date: 12/2i/2009
AI1ACHMEIU P A SE D F <ýq DUKE POWER COMPANY I*
LI IITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID:
?N VE2VW 180-1r'v
" item No:
M2.R1.11.1566 remarks:
[
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Reducer configuration LI LIMITED SCAN 1
L2
[j I Z2 cw Ul ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO
-.3 to Beyond ANGLE:
El 0 0 45 L0 60 other 70° FROM o-DEG to 360 DEG L-NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION El LIMITED SCAN I[1
[
2
]
1
[i:
2 cw [ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:
E] 0 E] 45 F1 60 other FROM DEG to DEG Eg NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Reducer configuration
-] LIMITED SCAN 0
1 0l 2 0
- 1-2 cw El ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO
-.3 to Beyond ANGLE:
U 0 [D 45 EU 60 other FROM DEG to DEG U-NO SCAN
-]
LIMITED SCAN SURFACE I-I1
[12 BEAM DIRECTION EI 1 [- 2 U1 cw [-] ccw Sketch(s) attached FROM L to L 4
]0 0 5 0-60 o
INCHES FROM WO to El yes
[I No ANGLE:
ther FROM DEG to DEG Prepared By:
Kenneth Ellis
'K A
Summary No,: M2.R1.11.1566 Examiner: Dean, Steven Examiner: Ellis It, Kenneth R.
Other: NIA Supplemental Report Report No.:
Page:
ATIACHMENi $
PAGE 62_
F ?V UT-09-042 Date.:
Y-/Y F"7 Date:
Level:
ti-N Level:
1i-N Level:
NIA Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
Comments: S2 Axial
-'C Sketch or Photoi: Z:kUTVDDeALIProfifeLlne2.jpg 708 450 I
LW AfIce.. / 91;1 X. 11511ý =. Rý5';j f-
~ ~/~5'~
J42~'
9.
ii' 5/1-1166ýele' j 2: -;z,,::! ý --, / -,/",
4---
S12-4~12~
AT TACHMEKI PA 6E 6-3 0 F ?ýt Summary No.: M2.Rt.11.1566 Examiner. Dean, Steven Examiner: Ellis II, Kenneth R.
Other: N/A Supplemental Report Report No.:
UT-09-042 Page:
rs-o, Level:
Il-N Level:
Il-N Level:
NIA Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
,-~,(
/1 Date: 9./q.o7 Date:
Date: 9'- zS"-5?
Comments: CW, CCW Coverage Sketch or Photo: Z:AUTVIDDEAL\\ProfileLIne2.jpg d
5/-~z I/2~
Site/Unit: McGuire /
Summary No.:
M2.
Workscope:
UT Pipe Weld -zxamination Al I ALM 5
MEA6q(~
Of ý 2
1.11.1730 Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PD1-UT-2 C
01845833 Outage No.:
M2-19 Report No.:
UT-09-055 Page:
1 of 9
ISI Code:
1998)2000 Addenda Cat./Item:
R-A/RI.11 Location:
Drawing No.:
MCFI-2NC2
==
Description:==
Nozzle to Pipe System ID:
NC Component ID: 2NC2FW2-2 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter:
1.406114.0 Limitations:
YES - See Limitation Sheet Start Time:
1108 Finish Time:
1215 Examination Surface:
Inside E Outside []
Surface Cornditlon: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.1.1.1 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL it Batch No.:
08125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
FISHER Serial No.:
MCNDE32768 Surface Temp.:
74
'F Cal. Report No.:
CAL-09-223 & CAL-09-224 Angle Used 0 145 145T 60 Scanning dB 1
37.7 37.7 66.4 Indication(s):
Yes W1 No El Scan Coverage:
Upstream E0 Downstream I]
FC 08-01, 08-04, 09-02 001 OR Results:
Accept 0 Reject Info J Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
Yes Examiner Level jI-N Si atIureý 7
Date Reviewer Signature Date Grlebel, David M.
9111/2009 ZF-z-Z3e---
Examiner Level li-N Sig ature Date Site Review Signature Date K oster, Rickey 9/1112009 Other Level Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date
Site/Unit:
Summary No.:
Workscope:
Ultrasonic Indication Report A11ACHMEN-1 5 PAGE4.5 OF 3 McGuire I
M2.R11.11.1730 ISI 2
Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
01845833 Outage No.:
M2-19 Report No.:
UT-09-055 Page:
2 of 9
Wo IL W11IW2 Search Unit Angle:
45 & 60 Wo Location:
Weld Centerline
( Piping Welds 0 Ferritic Vessels
> 27T (0 Other MP Metal Path Wmax Distance From Wo To S.U. At Maximum Response RBR Remaining Back Reflection W1 Distance From Wo At Of Max (Forward)
L Distance From Datum W2 Distance From Wo At Of Max (Forward)
Comments:
Indication recorded Is the trailing shear component from the 60° RL.
Supplementairkeport Report No.:
UT-C - J5 Page:
3 of 9
Summary No.: M2.R1.11.1730 Examiner: Griebel, David M.
Examiner: Koster, Rickey Other:
Level:
I1-N Level:
il-N Level:
Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
3~x~v?~
A~e~4 A
Date: 9-Z3-a Date:
2z Comments: 60=RL - Trailing shear component J,'oZZLE oxv P/Pg-
- 2.
- M.
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: McGuire /
2 Summary No.:
M2.RI.11.1730 Workscope:
ISI Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
01845833 Outage No.:
M2-19 Report No.:
UT-09-055 Page:
' of 9
45 den Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X 50.000
% volume of length /100 =
5.600
% volume of length /100 =
100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
100.000
% volume of length / 100 =
50.000
% total for Scan 1 5.600
% total for Scan 2 100.000
% total for Scan 3 100.000
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
63.900
% total for 45 deg Other deg -
(to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans, Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 0 Length X
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X
% volume of length /100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length 1 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
0 total for Scan 1
/ total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3 0 total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by ft of scans to determine; 63.900
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
Date:
'/7 a,
-Zi s~ri1
P A6E 6 OF 9L/
DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT ComponentlWeld ID:
2NC2FW2-2 Item No:
M2.RI.11.1730 remarks:
I-1 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Limited scan on nozzle Z
LIMITED SCAN LI Z 2 1
F1 2 LI cw [] ccw side due to nozzle FROM L to L 3600 INCHES FROM WO CL+1.0" to Beyond configuration ANGLE:
E] 0 M 45 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG r-NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION LIMITED SCAN El-1
[
2
(
1 [:
2 Ej cw [] ccw FROM L to L 3600 INCHES FROM WO CL+I.0" to -Beyond ANGLE:
El 0 E] 45 Z 60 other FROM DEG to DEG L-7 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION LIMITED SCAN I
[] 2 Ell 1l2 Llcwnlccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:
E) 0 [] 45 E] 60 other FROM DEG to DEG L7 NO SCAN El LIMITED SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION
[El IE12 R lE2 n cw []ccw FROM L to L 4
INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached Z
yes
[-]
No ANGLE:
E] 0 (:]
5 r-1 60 other FROM DEG to DEG
~M~Y Supplemiental Report MIACHMEUI P AE6q E
iF Report No.:
UT-09-055 Page:
6 of 9
Summary No.: M2.R1.11.1730 Examiner: Griebel, David M.
Examiner:
Koster, Rickey Other:
Level:
11-N Level:
II-N Level:
Reviewer:
Z
/
Site Review:
Date:.- Ž3-o?
Date:
Date.*
?
ANII Review:
//
I A
'I Comments: Area of Interest
/j'
-. ;t-zc V/
P---f A422ZLE-Jclzpý t)fx VIML, lpjý 0/p I I Ilez-AA c n',,.J i.Y 13 1 i- 'I-G',
a
/
/
A ta
/ _
C
/
~~~1 I
\\
/
I
/~>
M -
1 Supplemental Report Report No.:
Page:
ATTACHMENT PASEý7,1 OF9 UT-O9-bi-i 7
of 9
Date:
?~37-Z3-o Date: _____
Datefy~2&
Summary No.: M2.RI.11.1730 Examiner: Griebel, David M.
Examiner: Koster, Rickey Other.
Level:
il-N Level:
i1-N Level:
Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANii Review:
A-II U/
Comments: Axial Exam 45' shear & 60"RL
,.1zzokW
/VeZZILE iyPIPC P
C I
£t4
P MAAý DR-IIMPPPVqWWW-Supplemental T-report Report No.:
Page:
AJJACHMENT PAGE-7,/
OF~~
UT-09 i.
8 of 9
Summary No.: M2.R1.11.1730 Examiner: Griebel, David M.
Examiner: Koster, Rickey Other:
I Level:
11-N Level:
Il-N Level:
Reviewer:
1.
Site Review:
ANII Review:
Date:
f-2-9-o?
Date:
Date:
" 6' 61<
Comments: Axial Exam 450 shear & 60°RL AD 'Z z /-*
PIP25 L3C
/
Supplement-., Report Report No.:
Page:
ATIACHMENT E; P A 6E,7;g_
F z? a UT-t. ~55 9
of 9
Summary No.: M2.R1.11.17:
Examiner: Griebel, Davi Examiner: Koster, Ricke Other:
Level:
Il-N Level:
Il-N Level:
Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
J:l" j
(4 F4~r~
Date: f'-z&*-d 9 Date:
Date:c.?- 2'7-Comments: CW & CW 45* shear A/viZZZE
/
1~
I I )060 Cn Jelk(-4A (rf rJ-.
\\
57.Z S-1
Al 1ACHME%1 PAGE ?SOF ý Site)Unit: McGokaw 2
Sumnmary No.:
NVW1-Wi62 Woikscope:
,Q UT Base Met..i. ýLarilnation Procedure:
Procedure Rev.-
Work Order No.:
NOF-640 5
017.38678 Outage No.:
MIA Report No.: BOPUT-09-.55 Page:
I of 2
Code:
.NIA Cat/Item:
NIA Locetion:
N/A Drawing No.:
1IA
==
Description:==
PIPE TO FLANGE System ID:
NV Component 1o: NVFWI0-20 Sizel.-ength:
3' SCH 401 Thickness/ODrmetCr
.216 Limitations:
Yes- -See atteched Imitation sheet StartTime:
135.0 Finish Time-1400 Examfnatien Surface:
Inside Q Outside S Surface Condition: AS GROUNO Lo Location:
9.1.1.2 Wo Location:
Centerflfle of Weld Coupfant ULTRAfGEL It Batch No.:
06125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
D.A.S Serial No.:
MCMDE32835 Surface Temp.:
74 TF Scanning d*:
26 Cal. Report No.:
CALtOg-208. CAL-O9-209. CAL-09-2103&CAL-09-212 In.
Amplitude Positon One PoFmsion Max Position Two Ind.
I Loss Remrvibs No.
BackWsal FuBSc:oee, LI W1 W2 MP LU W1 W2 MP L2YWt W2 MP N~f
_R
'1.~
Comments:
NIA Resufts:
Accept 9 Reject Q Info C]
INITIAL PSI EXAM Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 96.%;
Yes Reviewed Praovduas Dato; NO EYiriner Level U.N Signatue-Dile Reve Signature D
Data Ross. Jake I-m
~
ý-
14 Exmie Level Il-t4 Date-Site Rgvlpw Signa"u Dateý pay. John, C.
812WlO09 Other Level NIA Stgfatwuto Dale ANtI Remiew Signature Dole NIA__
CT I P
A11ACHMEV ýS PA6E 7/
aF 79 Summary No.: NVFWIO-20 Examiner: Ross, Jake E.
Examiner: Day. John, C.
Other:
NIA Suppleme,,cal Report Report No.:
Level:
1l-N Level.
11-N Level:
NIA Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
P 18
.3OP-UT~-09.i355 2
of 2
Date: /o 4'2j-07 Date.
Date/.~
-00(
Comments:
(I Stetch or Photo: Z:ALrMDDEALQProfteUne2.1pg 47.ls' dy 4
4.
i
.[II l,
i
AIIACHMENT 6 PAGE -75 0F *7 MM6L W-M 01b.0 rwaRii1y UT Pipe Welu Examination Site/Unit: McGuire /
2 Summary No.:
NVFW1O-20 Workscope:
BOP Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
01738678 Outage No.:
NIA Report No.:
BOP-UT-09-151 Page:
1 of 8
Code:
N/A Cat./ltem:
NIA Location:
NIA Drawing No.:
==
Description:==
N/A System ID:
NV Component ID: NV-FW.10-20 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter:
.216131SS Limitations:
Yes - See attached limitation report Start Time:
1401 Finish Time:
1440 Examination Surface:
Inside f]
Outside EZ Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.1.1.1 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
08125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
D.A.S Serial No.:
MCNDE32835 Surface Temp.:
74
'F Cal. Report No.:
CAL-09-208, CAL-09-209, CAL-09-210 & CAL-09-212 Angle Used 0I 1 45 45T1 60I 70 I
I ScanningdB 51.2 151.2 1 69.2 1
Indication(s):
Yes []
No o Scan Coverage:
Upstream El Downstream FA CW R]
CCW &D Comments:
FC 08-01, 08-04, 09-02 Results:
Accept fJ Reject R)
Info 0 Initial Section XI Exam Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
No
Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: McGulre I 2
Summary No.:
NVFWI0-20 Workscope:
BOP Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
01738678 Outage No,:
NIA Report No.:
BOP-UT-09.151 Page:
2 of 8
45 de1t Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X 100.000
% Length X 50.000 0.000 50.000 50.000
" volume of length t 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
" volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
50.000
% total for Scan 1 0.000
% total for Scan 2 50.000
% total for Scan 3 50.000
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
37.500
% total for 45 deg Other dep -
1 (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4
% Length X
% Length X
" Length X
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length /100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 1
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by 9 of scans to determine; 37.500
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
Site Field Supervisor:
Date:
/4 Date:
ATTACHMENT PASE 77 OF '?ý DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT I
Component/Weld ID:
NVFW10-20 Item No:
01738678 remarks:
I NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION
-- LIMITED SCAN El 1 0
2 0
1 E] 2 [I] cw n-ccw PIPE TOFLANGE FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO 0.5 to Beyond CONFIGURATION ANGLE:
LI 0 0 45 F1 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG M NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION PIPE TO FLANGE F] LIMITED SCAN 1
1
[] 2 El1 N] 2 [] cw [] ccw CONFIGURATION FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO 0.3 to Beyond ANGLE:
C] 0 I] 45 E] 60 other 70 FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG
[
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION PIPE TO FLANGE
[j LIMITED SCAN
[: 1 0
2 El1
[:1 2 0 cw 9
ccw CONFIGURATION FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond ANGLE:
El 0 R 45 Ej 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E3 LIMITED SCAN L] 1 El 2
[] 1 E 2 [] cw LI ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached 4
ANGLE:
El 0 El 5 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG yes El No Prepared By:
Jake Ross Level:
II Date:
08/26/09
.Sheet 3 of 8 Reviewed By:
-Date:
0Authorized Inspector:
Date:
_____I___
9-372
.f
£5 S
PSI M"W.
Supplemelircal Report Report No.:
Page:
ATIACHMENIT PA6E 7 S OF 9?j BOr.*JT-O9-51 4
of 8
Date:
Summary No.: NVFWI0-20 Examiner: Ross, Jake 2.
Examiner: Day, John. C.
Other:
/
/
Level:
11-N Level:
.11-N Level:
NIA Reviewer:
Site Review:
AN1i Review:
/7 L
Comments: Area of Interest JxS3uJ !
. 0 7 ;.u-(3 10A*A Sketch or Photo: Z:\\UT)IDDEAL\\ProfileLine2.jpg A
I i
I;
,-,)
ofeA'o-ý I -
4VA 1:
4%
-- r=Ae,='
4=),, O~At%
I C
ATIACHMENT 5 PAGE 77OF 02t.
W MONW.
Supplemeital Report Repo,* No.:
BOr--dT-09-151 Page:
5 of 8
Summary No.: NVFWIO-20 Examiner: Ross,-Jake E.
Examiner Day, John, C.
Other:
,,=,,,
f Level:
fl-N Level:
Il-N Level:
NIA Reviewer-.
Site. Review:
ANII Review:
Date:
Date/bO-:
-O
/I/
Comments: SI Axial Coverage 7, *.'70,*E~r
- o.*,..
".",oL
- O *_*,*-
0.
Sketch or Photo: Z:.*UT'UDVEALIProfileLine2.jpg I
i i
T_
13 I.
I.
1.
'700
-'), 10 FrA e F-I -
f)eAll`ý'
rt-IL-t-
.e%
I
~'5( AL~
S ~s~-~z
~
ATTACHMENT 8 PABE co flF9?
nk n"Illm 5 0 M wn"" V Y.
Supplemental Report Report No.:
BOP-UT-09-151 Page:
6 of 8
Summary No.: NVFWIO-20 Examiner: Ross, Jake E.
Examiner: DayJoh C.
Other-NIA'
/
Level:
II-N Level:
Il-N Level:
N/A Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
i/s) oate: *-,
o-.
Date:
Date-Q5c Comments: S1 Axial Coverage Sketch or Photo: Z\\UTdIDDEALProfileLine2.jpg II I
I.
1 6 " rý I 4'*,.17,.Ae, ! ?
!19 1
-1 U
16
ATTACHMENT PASE,?/
OF 9y
- 19m, Supplemental Report Report No.:
BOP-UT-09-151 Page:
7 of 8
Summary No.: NVFW10-20 Examiner: Ross, Jake E.
Examiner: Day, John, C.
Other:
NIA Level:
11-N Level:
1I-N Level:
N/A Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
g~
4 I4~4~h~
7
Date:
- 7-3o-o9 Date:
Date/.'0 41-02 Comments: CW, CCW Coverage ABLE> 0 7,1/2r V, -7 Sketch or Photo: Z:\\UTUD DEALTProfileLine2.jpg A
-1 60Ae C:1
'fle.A I -F:ý rt I L-:L ý
-Ir-k MLýLzlus.
f=
A11ACiMENi 'S PAGE82 OF 95ý 19a"W.
Supplemerita! Report Report No.:
B0o'-UT-09-151 Page:
8
.of 8
Summary No.: NVFWIO-20 Examiner: Ross. Jake E.
Examiner: Day, John, C.
Other:
NIA i
i = irw
,/
6 W4 -- D:
Level:
I1-N Level:
Il-N Level:
N/A Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
Date:
Date:
Date:/
4 Comments: Supplementa! Coverage Comments: Supplemental Coverage
-z x~4. t~ ~
\\*...
4t~L~ffiQ2~L~-
L*J~L~-
3*
~.
Sketch or Photo: Z:AU~hDDEALIProfileLine2.jpg X-,
9fA,: e I
I 7
AIIACHMER'i 13
- PAGE3, O
Si'el/Unit: McGuire 1 2
Summary No.:
NVFWJ 80-46 WorDscope.
BOP UT Base Met4.. Lamination Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NOE-640 5
0173867.8 Outage No.:
NIA Report No.:
BOP-UT-09-157 Page:
1 of 2
Code:
NIA CaL/Ilem:
N/A Location:
NIA Drawiqg No.:
N(A
==
Description:==
Pipe to valve System 10:
NV Component I:
2NVFWI8Oq46
$ize/Length:
4' SCH 40 Thickness/Diameter.
.237 Limitations:
Yes - See attached IItmitation sheet Start Time:
IM20 Finish Time:
1330 Examination Surface:
Inside C)
Outside
- Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.1.1.1 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Co.uplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
0.8125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
DAJS Serial No.:
MCNDE32335 Surface Temp.:
74
- F Scanning dB:
25 Cal. Report No.:
CAL-O9-208, CAL,-0-209, CAL-09-210 &CAL-09-212 Ampftudo Posfiton One Position Max Position Two Ind.
Los.
Remrks BackWall Ftl Sreen LI WI W2 MP "tM W1 W2 MP L2 WI W2 MP NRI Comments:
NIA Results:
Accept CJ Reject C]
A1TACHMW~ 9 P AS E L.ý OF ýq pp M-,
Supplemental Report Report No.:
BOP-UT-09-157 Page:
2 of 2
Summary No.: NVFW118O-46 Examiner~ Ross. Jake 15.
Examiner Day John. C.
Oilier:
=
LUvef:
I1-N Level:
I1-N Level:
NIA Site Review:
ANJI Review.
Date: to j*6.07 Date:
o *e
-0?
VL/
Comments: Limitation Sketch or Photo: Z*.ILMTIDDEALProfileUne24pg AO~
~.b
.A.00 I
r I
I
AllmmwI 15 FA6E V'5 DF~9 Site/Uni Mc~3uire 2
$rurnmay Ho.:
NVFWIOO-46 Wot)kscope.z SOP UT Pipe'Weld Examination Procedure:
Procdure Rev.:
Work OCder No.
POI.IUT-2 C
01738878 OutaW No.:
n/A Report No.: BOP-UM-09.154 Page:
1 of 4
Code; WiA CatJte=
WIA Location:
MIA Drawing No.:
HIA Descripllon: -Eg.ew-plpe to valve System ID:.
NV 0--o Component 10: NVFWIS"-6 SizelLengft WA Tflw~essliameter
.23714755S Limlantalion See 2ttachmpats SWnf Tlgne:
1410 Pinisil Time:
1459 F.aamrtialron Surface:
Inside Q outside g]
Surface Condiion: AS GROUND Lo Localion:
9.1.1.1 Wo Location:
Centerline of.Weld CouplatL ULTRAGELII Temp. TooJ Mfg.:
D.A.S Serial Nio.:
MCNOE3283S Suirace Temp,:
74 F
Cal. Report No.:
CAL-00-2OB, CAL.09-209. CA6-09-210 & CAI..09,212 Angle Used 10 41 451JST 160 70 Scanning d8B 5-1.2 151-.2 8S."
inlcation(s).
Yes fl No@9 Sca.n Coverage: Upstream I Downstream -
CW 9 C
Comments:
FC 08-01, 08-04, 09-02 Batch No-,
08125 Cwr9)
Results:
Accept Q Reject 0 Info Q]
INITrAL PSI *XAM Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 9%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
NO
coo~
2MNS NVFW2.80- 46
,L DEi:
04ý a
rn iv S
.4 et.I I
AR(~-~J ~
A grýjj ; n v
nSý
ý: 13 Odi
-O'ja A. 11 A
ýal W) 5,0 Examiner Date ________E 31ftxJý{
A11ACHMENT 1 PAGE 27 OF9LI DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT ComponentfWeld ID:
NVF-WI8-46 Item No:
N/A remarks:
0 NO SCAN SURFACE' BEAM DIRECTION No scan on valve side due to El LIMITED SCAN 0 1 C3 2 E"-1 0 2 0 cw caw taper-supplemental scan with FROM L 0"
to L 14.1" INCHES FROM VVO N/A to NIA TO, shearfrom elbowside ANGLE:
0l 0 i] 45 [] 60 other FROM NIA DEG to-N/A DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION El LIMITED SCAN El I El 2
[
1 E( 2 El cw (
cew FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:
LI 0 [] 45 U 60 other FROM DEG to DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION El LIMITED SCAN l1 E] 2 l1 E 2 El cw ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:
C3 0 El 45 171 60 other FROM DEG. to DEG El NO SCAN El LIMITED SCAN SI El URFACE BEAM DIRECTION I
E2 0
(1 El2 Ecw E]cew INCHES FROM WO to FROM L to L 4
ANGLE:
0 0 U]
5
]60 qt FROM DEGto DEG Sketch(s) attached El yes El No
,her
.1' Prepared By:
Jake RctSs. IAfk12,L Level I I Reviewed By:.
r' Date:
G,
LAJC=S ftdm 9-At Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe SitelUnit: McGulre I 2
Summary No.:
NVFWI80-46 Workscope:
BOP Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
01738678 Outage No.:
NIA Report No.:
BOP-UT-09.154 Page:
4 of 4
45 deg Scan I Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X 0.000 100.000
% Length X 25.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000 25.000 50.000 50.000
% total for Scan 1
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total f6r Scan 4 Add totals and divide by# scans =
31.250
% total for 45 deg Other deg -
I (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X
% volume of length 1100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length /100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 1
% total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by 4 of scans to determine; 31.250
%Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor.
iFd e sa Date:./t)II 8&ý
AIIACHMENI MAE y OF F9 SitleUnit-McGulre 1 2
Summary No.,
NVFW180-45 Workscope:
BOP UT'Base MetL,_amination Procedure:
Piocedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
NDE-640 0
01738678 Outage No.:'
NWA Report No.: BOP-UT-09-156 Page:
1 of 2
Code:
NIA Cak/Item:
N/A Location:
NIA Drawing No.:
NIA Description; ELBOW TO VALVE System ID:
NV Component ID: NVFE4:80'45 Size/Length; 4'" SCJH 4,0.
Thlckness/Dlameter
.237 Limitations:
Yes -- ee attached limitation sheet Start Time:
1330 Finish Time:
1340 Examination Surface:
inside fl Outside 0 Suifce Condition: AS. GROUND L0 Location:
9.1.1.1 Wo Location:
Centerline of Weld Couplant:
ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
.081525 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
D.A.S Serial No.:
MCNDE32835 Surface Temp.:
74 F
Scanning dB:
26 Cal. Report No-CAL-0O1-208. CAL-09-209. CAL-09-210 &CAL-09-212 Amplitude Positlion One Pos;ion Max Position Two Ind.
Loss Remarks No.
Back Walt Full Screen LI WI W2 MP LIM WI W2 MP L.2 W
W2 LIP NRI Comments:
NiA Results:
Accept 2 Reject [D info E]
INITIAL PSI EXAM Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
Yes Reviewed Previous Data:
NO SExaminer Level 11-N Signature Date Reviewe Signature Date Examiner Level IlN 41ga Date Site Reviqew Signature Date Day, John, C.
8126)2009 o
Other Level 14A Signaturt/
Date ANII Review Signature Oat*
NA f1
/_
AIIACHMENI S PAGE ý0OF C~L IDWW.
Supplemental Report Report No.:
BOP-UT-00-156 Page:
2 of 2
Summary No.: NVFWI8O-45 Examiner. Ross, Jake E.
Examiner:..Day. John. C.
Other; MIA q
Level:
i11-N Level:
If-N Level:
NIA Reviewer:
Site Review:
ANII Review:
Date:
Date:
o-0:
9 Comments-Sketch or Photo: Z7UT1VDDEALProfifeUne2.opg j
v.)8 I
I
ATIACHMEN-' 3ý PABE fl OF 'P SitelUnil McGuire /
2 Summary No.:
NVFWI86-4,5 Workscope:
pOP UT Pipe Weld Examination Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDW-T-2 C
Outage No.:
NIA Report No.:
BOP.-UT.09-152 Page:
1 of 4
Code:
N/A CatJltem:
NIA Location:
NIA Drawing No.:
RIA Descrfption: Elbow to valva System ID:
2NV Component ID: NVFW80&-45 Size/Length:
NIA Thickness/Diameter.
.23714*/SS Limitalions:
Yes - See attached fimitaqion report.
Start Time:
1415 Finish Time:
1445 Examination Surface:
Inside Q Outlside 2 Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:
9.1.1.2 Wo LOcation:
Centerline of Weld Couplant ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:
08125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:
D.A4S Serial No.:
MCNDE32835 Surface Te~mp.:
74 "F
Cal. Report No.:
CAL-09-208. CALo09-209. CAL-09-210 & CAL CALo09-212 Angle Used j0 45 1 45TJ 601 70 Scanning dB 51.2 1 51.2 68-49 Indication(s):
Yes Q No [R Scan Coverage:
Upstream (]
Downstream R1 CW q CCW GD Comments:
FC 80-01, 08-04, 09-02 Results:
Accept '
Reject 2 Info C]
INITIAL PSI EXAM Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:
No Reviewed Previous Data:
NO/
Examiner Level I.N Dl Examner Leve
- gii, signature~.
Oato Revieweogf)
Signature Dt Ross, JIake E.
8/26/2009 19Ga-r-.
t 2-(
Eamitner Level IlNSt aDuat~e Site Review Signature Date Day, John, C.
8/26f2009 Other Level N/A Signature Date ANJI Review Signature NIA
LLM~
2MNS NVFW180-45 q s ui;--
nrA~
r ov/~tr Nzi, ed*LL od,'
Examiner(
Date __41L4_1 1..
A11ACHMEI4!
PA6E ý 3 OF ý DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID; NVFW180-45 Item No:
N/A remarks:
NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION N6 scan on valve side due to U LIMITED SCAN N
I j 2 U1 N] 2 N Cw cr-w tapersupplemental scan With FROM L 0"
to Beyond.
70* shear from etbow side ANGLE:
E] 0 2) 45 C] 60 other FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG U NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION ULIMITED SCAN U 1
[U 2 U 1 [] 2 0 cw 0
ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:
E] 0 17 45 0 60 other FROM DEG to DEG Ul NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION ULIMITED SCAN El 1 U 2 El f E w
w2 0_ cw 0_ ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE:
(j 0 C] 45 0 60 other FROM DEG to DEG E] NO SCAN U7 LIMITED SCAN
[
FROM L to L 4
ANGLE:
LI 0 []
5,P 60 o
SURFACE
]1 U2 BEAM DIRECTION Ul 1 [U 2 Ul cw [U ccw Sketch(s) attached INCHES FROM WO to ther FROM DEG to DEG c] yes El No Prepared By:
Jake Rosj 4
/
.i/'2---4 Level:
AI Reviewed By:
Date:
b
rw Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations - Pipe Site/Unit: McGuire 1 2
Summary No.:
NVFW180-45 Workscope:
BOP Procedure:
Procedure Rev.:
Work Order No.:
PDI-UT-2 C
01738678 Outage No.:
N/A Report No.:
BOP-UT-09-152 Page:
4 of 4
45 de1 Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000
% Length X 0.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000 100.000
% Length X 50.000
% volume of length / 100 =
0.000
% volume of length I 100 =
50.000
% volume of length / 100 =
50.000
% volume of length) 100 =
50.000
% total for Scan 1
- total for Scan 2
% total for Scan 3
% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans =
37.500
% total for 45 deg Oher deg -
I (to be used for supplemental scans)
The data to be listed below Is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X
% Length X
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length /100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% volume of length / 100 =
% total for Scan 1
% total for Scan 2
/ total for Scan 3 0 total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine-37.500
% Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
SiteFied Spervsor Dae: L/L,-L/
-'1 Date:
I () hs ( /1)7.