Letter Sequence Acceptance Review |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARPNP 2011-002, License Amendment Request for Spent Fuel Pool Region I Criticality2011-01-31031 January 2011
License Amendment Request for Spent Fuel Pool Region I Criticality
Project stage: Request
ML11236A1342011-07-31031 July 2011
Westinghouse WCAP-17400-NP, Rev. 0, Prairie Island, Units 1 and 2 Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Safety Analysis, Enclosure 4
Project stage: Request
L-PI-11-075, Letter from Xcel Energy License Amendment Request for Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes2011-08-19019 August 2011
Letter from Xcel Energy License Amendment Request for Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes
Project stage: Request
ML1127802662011-10-0303 October 2011
Acceptance Review License Amendment Request for Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes
Project stage: Acceptance Review
L-2011-409, Revision to Extended Power Uprate License Amendment Request Proposed Technical Specification Regarding Fuel Loading Curve and Areal Density Criteria for Metamic Inserts2011-10-14014 October 2011
Revision to Extended Power Uprate License Amendment Request Proposed Technical Specification Regarding Fuel Loading Curve and Areal Density Criteria for Metamic Inserts
Project stage: Request
ML1125602172011-10-25025 October 2011
Request for Withholding of Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
ML1206203892012-03-20020 March 2012
Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request for Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes
Project stage: RAI
L-2012-132, Extended Power Uprate License Amendment Request - Supplement to Proposed Technical Specification Changes Related to Spent Fuel Storage Requirements and Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) References2012-03-31031 March 2012
Extended Power Uprate License Amendment Request - Supplement to Proposed Technical Specification Changes Related to Spent Fuel Storage Requirements and Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) References
Project stage: Supplement
L-PI-12-038, Westinghouse, Affidavit - CE-12-3 16, Revision 1, Westingliouse Suggested Responses to the Requests for Additional Information Presented in ML1206203892012-05-0303 May 2012
Westinghouse, Affidavit - CE-12-3 16, Revision 1, Westingliouse Suggested Responses to the Requests for Additional Information Presented in ML120620389
Project stage: Other
ML12139A1982012-05-16016 May 2012
Response to Requests for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes (TAC Nos. ME6984 and ME69851)
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML12215A2522012-08-0707 August 2012
Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request for Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes
Project stage: RAI
L-PI-12-066, Enclosure 2 to L-PI-12-066 - Westinghouse Affidavit, Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure2012-08-27027 August 2012
Enclosure 2 to L-PI-12-066 - Westinghouse Affidavit, Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure
Project stage: Request
ML12249A0692012-09-0404 September 2012
Response to Requests for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML13011A3162013-01-22022 January 2013
Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request for Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes
Project stage: RAI
L-PI-13-002, Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes2013-02-0808 February 2013
Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML13197A3972013-06-25025 June 2013
NRR E-mail Capture - Prairie Island Ngp - Sfpc LAR Draft RAI
Project stage: Draft Approval
L-PI-13-067, Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes2013-07-17017 July 2013
Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Associated with Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML13241A3832013-08-29029 August 2013
Issuance of Amendments Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes
Project stage: Approval
2012-05-16
[Table View] |
Text
From:
Beltz, Terry Sent:
Monday, October 03, 2011 11:17 AM To:
gene.eckholt@xenuclear.com Cc:
'Glenn.Adams@xenuclear.com'; Wengert, Thomas; Lingam, Siva; Boyle, Patrick
Subject:
Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance Review re:
License Amendment Request for Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Changes (TAC Nos. ME 6984 and ME6985)
Dear Mr. Eckholt:
By letter dated August 19, 2011 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML112360231), Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, doing business as Xcel Energy, submitted a license amendment request to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The proposed amendment would revise Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.17, Spent Fuel Pool Storage and TS 4.3.1, Fuel Storage Criticality, for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested and following, as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required.
This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions regarding also contact Tom Wengert at (301) 4 Sincerely, Terry A. Beltz, Senior Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-3049 Terry.Beltz@nrc.gov this matter, I may be reached at (301) 415-3049 415-4037.
- 9. You may
