ML11265A043

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Review of 30-Day Notification Report Regarding Changes to an Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Resulting in a Peak Cladding Temperature Difference in Excess of 50 Degrees Fahrenheit
ML11265A043
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River 
Issue date: 09/30/2011
From: Farideh Saba
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Franke J
Florida Power & Light Co
Saba F
References
TAC ME4944
Download: ML11265A043 (3)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 30,2011 Mr. Jon A. Franke, Vice President Crystal River Nuclear Plant (NA2C)

ATIN: Supervisor, Licensing & Regulatory Programs 15760 W. Power Line Street Crystal River, Florida 34428-6708

SUBJECT:

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 - REVIEW OF 30-DAY NOTIFICATION REPORT REGARDING CHANGES TO AN EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM EVALUATION RESULTING IN A PEAK CLADDING TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE IN EXCESS OF 50 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT (TAC NO. ME4944)

Dear Mr. Franke:

By letter dated September 8, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML102530447), as supplemented by letter dated December 3,2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML103440391), Florida Power Corporation (the licensee) reported an error correction discovered in the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) evaluation model, or in the application of such a model, that affects the peak cladding temperature (PCT) calculation at Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant (CR-3). The letter dated September 8, 2010, was submitted to satisfy the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), paragraph 50.46(a)(3)(ii), which requires reporting of a calculated PCT change in excess of 50 degrees Fahrenheit (OF). The reported error was an estimated increase of 225 OF in PCT for a postulated small break loss-of-coolant-accident.

The intent of the 10 CFR 50.46(a)(3}(ii) reporting requirement is to enable the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to determine the safety significance of errors and changes identified in ECCS evaluation models, and to take action if the NRC staff determines that the ECCS evaluation models do not meet applicable regulatory requirements.

The licensee's submittal dated September 8,2010, did not contain sufficient information to enable a determination of the safety significance of the error, as described above. Based on the NRC staff's concerns regarding the safety significance of the error and the adequacy of the overall evaluation model, the NRC staff requested the licensee provide additional information.

In response to the NRC staff's request for additional information, the licensee's supplemental letter dated December 3, 2010, provided additional detail regarding the axial power shapes assumed in the acceptable evaluation model, and clarified how the error impact was estimated using analyses that assumed a more limiting power shape.

Further, on June 15, 2011, the licensee submitted a license amendment request (LAR) seeking approval to implement an extended power uprate (EPU) for CR-3. This LAR is currently under acceptance review by the NRC staff. The EPU amendment if approved, would implement a new ECCS evaluation that corrects this error. This satisfies the intent of the 10 CFR 50.46(a)(ii)

J. Franke

- 2 reporting and reanalysis requirement for CR-3, and eliminates the model error. Therefore, no additional review under TAC ME4944 is needed.

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at (301) 415-1447.

Sincerely, Farideh E. Saba, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-302 cc: Distribution via Listserv

J. Franke

- 2 reporting and reanalysis requirement for CR-3, and eliminates the model error. Therefore, no additional review under TAC ME4944 is needed.

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at (301) 415-1447.

Sincerely, IRA!

Farideh E. Saba, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-302 cc: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 RidsNrrLACSola LPL2-2Reading RidsOgcRp RidsRgn2MailCenter RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR RidsNrrPMCrystalRiver RidsNrrDssSrxb BParks, NRRlDSS ADAMS Accession No.: ML11265A043 OFFICE LPL2-2/PM LPL2-2/LA NAME FSaba CSoia DATE 09/22111 09/22/11 NRRlLPL2-2/BC DBroaddus 09/29/11 LPL2-21PM FSaba 09/30/11