ML112630125
| ML112630125 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 09/20/2011 |
| From: | Pickett D Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Furio P Constellation Energy Group |
| Pickett , D. NRR/DLPM, 415-1364 | |
| References | |
| TAC ME7086, TAC ME7087 | |
| Download: ML112630125 (1) | |
Text
From:
Pickett, Douglas Sent:
Tuesday, September 20, 2011 9:24 AM To:
'Furio, Patricia S' Cc:
Grover, Ravinder; Elliott, Robert; Lingam, Siva; Boyle, Patrick; Salgado, Nancy
Subject:
Acceptance Review for Calvert Cliffs TACs ME7086 & ME7087 Ms. Furio:
By letter dated August 31, 2011 (TAC Nos. ME7086 & ME7087), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC submitted a license amendment request for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The amendment would replace the departure from nuclear boiling numeric limits in the Technical Specifications with references to the Core Operating Limits Report. The proposed changes are consistent with TSTF-487-A, Revision 1, Relocate DNB Parameters to the COLR.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Please contact me if you have any questions. A copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.
Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Calvert Cliffs, R.E. Ginna U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov