ML110970622
| ML110970622 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 04/06/2011 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-II |
| To: | Progress Energy Carolinas |
| References | |
| 50-324/10-302, 50-325/10-302 | |
| Download: ML110970622 (44) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: -3° 2 Date of Examination: izi Developed by: Written - Facility(>1 NRC Li II Operating - Facility 1 NRC Li Target . Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) .-. Examiners Initials
-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (Cia; C.2.a and b)
-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2e)
-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)
[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)]
{-75} 6. lntegrat1xaminatpn outlines) due, [pcluding Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ft ES-301-1, ES-302, ES-30T-5, ES-ID-ls, ES-401-112, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f, C.3.d)
{-70} {7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}
{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including wriffen, walk-through JPMs, and
\nJ scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)
-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202) 1)
-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; J\
) V.
-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f) .
-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or2 (if>10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed -
with facility licensee (C.3.k)
-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply) to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201, Page 25 of 28
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Brunswick Date of Examination: December 2010 Initials Item Task Description
- 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. ]j tI4 R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled. 1121 I -
T ii T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. \tfl
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. 1/it i4/A
- 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number S
of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
)jl.v I1 +4L M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule i L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
- c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form
/ (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
\\
9 ,,j (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified 4
j (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
- c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix - \\
of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
in the appropriate exam sections.
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. . \lA
- c. Ensure that KJA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f.__Assess_whether_the_exam_fits_the_appropriate job_level_(RD_or_SRO).
Printed NameSignatbf,e jat
- a. Author Michael M. Nemec / 1 /...) /
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) LOIJAgb .
c.
d.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
NRC Supervisor IIj LJJLii.&V. WIpAJA.MAJ/
1- I ui/Z9/io Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 12/06 12/20/2010 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 12/06 12/20/2010
. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGTURE (1) DATE SIGNAT (2) DATE NOTE 4C.4AITh) AO7/14/
- i. fl1A.a1Lc. EIcAm DyLLi)t 1#.i
- 2. 4-i1A //?
1 1j1
/L
- 3. a-iciI( S1- Spfvfr L 7//c/4-. V4%iK\ jl1 4 flS% 1C4c. h4 -kD 5.144 k r%tiri ,2 fl&1 .5Z-7: /c - / e__
1
- 6. Sri Jh4 TeJeL.yV\ I te 7.1;4 CA Re+er Oper4tr \\ ,uO C4 c1,/,o CAZ 1,z ii IG_____
- 8. 3SI re4.1 ptfLf 2
(-
- 9. LW çP,c
/10. . 0. &1r.& xU1 k4tr- IzZ- 9L / vCj 11.j4tLk:L. L4 7 Lvtr H,JP /c/57w -
P A,n(a41iL4d) 12.4. /-A/k--J 972x /1
- 13. 5. ,(1,c.A LOIf 4c72 f,2Z- v frtLW i 2J2,/,
14.- cflM41( 5Y%JIL,I7 7rc4 7 Ofe?t4%,t if/if I/cs UI
- 15. Ift-i kA)Z Sf fr7iflh71.O %11.4 NOTES:
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
- 1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 12/06 12/20/2010 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
- 2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 12/06 12/20/2010
. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTE AME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE DATE NOTE A - 1-0/ i;o4/ /a-A? /ó ttHi iZyblo 4Th1/LZ/ i-Z4-iO
&4Oh) M/4R,Df ,zo /2-tIlv 5 r- t4UE.TeC 3 4/ &c J,t I2CJtO NOTES:
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility BrunjcL_____________________ Date of Examination: December_201.Q Examination Level: RO SRO-l Operating Test Number FINAL Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note) Code*
R, M Battery Ground Calculation Conduct of Operations P, M Evaluate Overtime Eligibility Conduct of Operations R, M Surveillance Acceptance Criteria Review Equipment Control R. M. P Determine Stay Times in a High Radiation Area Radiation Control I R, N (SRO4 only) Protective Action Recommendations (PAR)
Emergency Procedures/Plan NOTE All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
Type Codes & Criteria. (C)ontrol room, (S)imuiator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank ( 1)
(P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected>
ES-301 Control Roomlln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility. Brunswick Date of Examination: Q,gO1O Exam LeveL RO SRO-t Operating Test No. FINAL Control Room Systems (8 for RO), (7 for SRO-l)
System / JPM Title Type Code Safety Function
- c. Resetting CO-FIC-49 S. N 8
- d. SLC lnibat;on WIRWCU failure S. A. D, E 1 e Crosstie 480V E-Busses S. D, 6 f Reopen MSIVs using hard card S D 3
- g. RCIC start in Pressure Control wth isolation faikire S. N, A 4
I. SBGT Deluge Reset R, D B
), Vent the Scram Air Header R, A, E, D 1
- k. Heater Drain Pump Injection R, E, D 2 All RD and SRO-l control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety funchons; all 5 SRO.U systems must serve different safety functions, in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room Type Codes Criteria for RD I SRO-l / S RD-U (A)lternate path 4-6 I 4-6 / 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank / S 8 / S 4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant a 1 /a 1 / a 1 (EN)gineered safety feature - / - I 1 tcontroi room system)
(L)ow-Power / Shutdown a 1 Ia 1 1 a 1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 A) a 2 /a 2 / a 1 (P)rev,ous 2 exams S 3 / s 3 / 2 (randomly selected)
(R)CA al/al/al (S)mulatoT
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 FII4L-Facility: Brunswick Date of Examination: 12/2010 Operating Test Number: Defr Initials
- 1. General Criteria a b*
- a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with ,
sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
.7
- b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
- c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section 0.1 .a.)
I
- d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. J4 1
- e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria -- --
- a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
- initial conditions
- initiating cues
- references and tools, including associated procedures
- reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee
- operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-3d -1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance )v criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. Simulator Criteria --
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
7
Printed Name / Signature Date
- a. Author 1i /iJ-lA 9/
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) I.M4U . i? 22- 1ci//S/ao/c
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) lji 6. Lc C.\f./I f4i
- d. NRC Supervisor ____
NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist - Form ES3O1-4 Facility; Brunswick Date of Exam December 2010 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/315/6 0 QUALiTATIVE ATTRIBUTES
- 1. The initial cnditlons are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expectea events.
- 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related ever.ts
- 3. Each event descnpt:on consists of
. the point in the scenano when it is to be nitiated
. he malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
. the symptoms/cues that wi be visible to the crew
. the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
- 5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
P Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain conpete evaluation results corrimensurate with the scenario cbiectives
- 7. II hme compression techniques are used, the scenario sunirnarv clearly so indicates, Opoiators have sufficient :ime to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are given.
- 8. ice s;rnulator modeling is not alterea
- 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator perfcrmance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated ior l midlity ir iaintened whi e running the pa med scenarios to snsure that func 1
- 10. Every operator will be evaluated using at feast ore new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance wIth Section D.5 of ES-301.
- 11. All individual operator competenctes can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
- 12. Each apolicant will be siqnificanily involved in the minimum number of transients and events.
spocited on Form ES-3015 (sucrnit the form with the simulator scenarios)
- 13. The level of difficuityappropriate to support hcensing decisions for each crew position.
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual At:ributes 1 /2/3/5/6
- 1. Tolairnelfunctions(53)__________________________ 5/6/5/6/6 2, Malfunctions, after EOP entry (12) 1 12/2/ 2/2
- 3. Abnorrns.ievents(24) 3/2/3/2/2 4 Major nransents (12) 1 / I / 1 1 2 I 5 EOPs entered/requiring substantive actinns (12) 2 I 2 / 2 / 2/2 S COP contingencies requiring substantive actions (021 0 / 1 / 2 / 1 /0 Criticat tasks 12-3) 3/2/ 3/2/2
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Brunswick Date of Exam: December 2010 Operating Test No: FINAL A E Scenarios P V T M 1 2 3 5 P E I
L N CREW CREW CREW CREW N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A M
A T S R
A T
B 0
S R
A T
B 0
S R
A T 0 B S R
A T
B 0
L u M(*)
N 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P P R I U T
E RO a
1 RX I___
2b ii 10 sro-i NOR 2 1 2 1 1 1 I I/C 47 13.6 3,4 7 4 4 2 MAJ Gj 6 32 21 RO 2NQR 2 12111 RcI /Q 4 136 356 8 4 4 2
[H a MAJ 6 6674221 RO. RX 1 3a 3 1 10 sroi 1 NOR 2 2a 2 1 1 1 I
SRO.U I/C 345, 6,7 4.5,6 5,7 10 4 4 2 MAJ 6 6 6 3 2 21 TS 0,3.5 3 0 2 2 lO RX 1 3a 2 1 1 0 SR1I 3NOR 2 i.i2 ill S I/C 3,4,5, 45.6 24.7 11 4 4 2 SRO-U 6,7 a H
TS 0,3,5 3 0 2 2
-- ..- = = = = = = =
RO RX I 25 3a 31 10 H 4[NOR IC 35.6 1,3,4,5, 2.3.4. 14 4 4 I
2 sno,u 6 5,6a.
H MAJ 6 6 6,7 4 2 2 1
TS 1 34 02 4 6 0 ) 2 I
- 3a 2 1 1 0 RO
[ NOR 2 1 2 1 1 1 SRO..l 5 I/C 3,4,5, 5.7 3,5, 10 4 4 2
,R 6.7 MAJ 6 22 TS 03,5 30 2J
ES-301 Transient and Event Checkist Form ES-301-5 Facr ty hunswrck Date o Exam December 2010 Operating rest No FINAL A E Scenarios P V T M P 2 3 5 E .. 0 L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION r M
- S A B S A B S A B S A B L u A T B 1 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 N Y 0 C P 0 c P o c P 0 C P RU Fl T RO 3 RX
- 1 1 0 NOR _
1 11 SROU
+/-
MAJ :.
TS 0 2 2 RX 2b RD NOR 2a SRO-l 8 I/C 1,3,4,5 5.7 3.56 10 4 4 2
1 1 2 1 1 ji
., t/C 1.3, 3.4 2,3.4, 11 4 4 2 SRO-U S 5.Sa.
i7a MAJ 6 $ 6,7 4 2 2 .1 IS 0,2,4 3 0 2 2
.Q. RX 3a 3a 2 1 1 0 Si I 10 NOR 2 1 * *
- 2 1 1 1 I/C 45,6 3,4,5, 2.4,7 10 4 4 2 SRO-U 7 a
[1 MAJ iS 2.4 2 022
... ,,,,t==.=== tttr., ,,_. ;...
Instructions:
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-Di event numbers (or each event type; IS are not applicable for RD applicants ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions, Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or conponent (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, ri the AID position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP positron, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC positron 2 Reactivity marirpulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5 d) hut must be significant per Section C 2 a of Appendix D. ç) Reactivity and normal evolutrons may he replaced wth additional instrument or component malfunctions on a I-for-i basrs.
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified (or the applicants iicense level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Brunswick Date of Exam: December 2010 Operating Test No.: FiNAL A E Scenarios P V 5 2 T M 3
P E L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N t T PQSON POTJON POSfl1ON POSfl1ON A C S A B S A B S A B S A B L u A T R 1 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 M(*)
P ZZZ4L RORX_
NOR 1 2a 2 1 1 1 SROl 2
- I/C 34 134 12 4 4 2 SCj 7 5,6 L7 MAJ 6 6 6 3 2 2 1 TS 24 1,3,4 5 0 2 2 RX I 3a 2 1 10 2 NOR i_
SROl 6 I/C . 3,56 3,4 2,3,4, 11 4 4 2 56a Z ;V t? .,. . -
MAJ 6 6 67 4 2 2 I 2 RX I 2110 SROI N
7 OR 2 1 2 1 11 I/C 4 35 247 9 4 4 2 bu 7 a
[1 MAJ 6 6 6.7 4 2 2 1
-- TS .J., 2.4 2 0 22 RO RX Ii 10 I ., -.;. .: ****---- ,-
+.
Ol N2L___ i_
n SRO4J MAJ 2 2 1 L. TS 022 instructions
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; 75 are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (SOP) positions: Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the 130P position, one [IC malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D,5.d) but must be significant per Section C,2.a of Appendix 0. () Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis
- 3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require venfiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the righthand columns.
ES-301 Competericies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Brunswick Date of Examination: December 2010 Operating Test No;Final APPLICANTS ROl
- R02
- R03 RO SRO-I SROi Li SRO-I SRO-I SRO-U fl SRO-U fl SRO-UEI SROU fl Competencies jQ SCENAR SCENARIO SCENARIO Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions I Comply With and A VI Al, Use Procedures (1) 1I Operate Control ::
I I Boards (2)
Comrnun,cate \
and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)
- Comply With and UseTech.Specs(3) 1.
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical SpecificatIon compliance for an RO.
(2> Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs Instructions:
Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that wi/f allow the examiners to evaluate evety applicable competency for evenj applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 fraciiity: Brunswick Date of Examination: December 2010 Operating Test No.: Final APPLICANTS RO H RO H RO H RO H SRO-I1 B SRO12 B SRO-13 B SR&14 SRO-U SRO-U H SRO-U [1 sRo-u H Competencies SARQ SNARIO f1O SNIQ_,
123 123 125 125 A I All Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions All All \il All All All All Al Al hi pIy With and Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control $
Boards (2)
All hil hA All All UI ll All AU All C ornmunicate and Interact l Al U, A.
Demonstrate A A Comply With and I Notes (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO (2) OptIonal for an SROU.
(3) Only applicable to SROs Instructions:
Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the earniners to evaluate evety applicable competency for even, applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES3O1-6 Facility: Brunswick Date of Examination: December 2010 Operating Test No.: Final APPLICANTS RO H RO H RO H RO ri SRO-15 S SRO-16 S SRO-17 S SRO-18 S SRO-U H SRO-U H SRO-U 1 SRO-U H Competencies SCENA1O SNIQ_ SCENAR0 NIO 1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5 2 3 5 Interpret./Dagnose Events and Conditions Comply VVith and Use Procedures (1)
I :
Operate Control Boards (2>
6-V.
Communicate - . V v and Interact Demonstrate .
SupervisoryAbility(3)
Comply With and
, Use Tech. Specs. (3) I =
Notes (1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RD.
(2) Optional for an SROU.
(3) Only applicable to SROs Instructions:
Check the applicants license type and enter one or ,iiore event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES3O1 Competencies Checklist - Form ES-301-6 Faclfty: Brunswick Date of Examination; December 2010 Operating Test No.; Final APPLICANTS RO El RO 1 RO H RO H SRO-l9
- SRO-IIOR SRO-l SRO-l H SRO-U H SRO-U H SRO-U El SRO-U T.
Competencies NA!O SNIO CNIQ_
.4 interpret/Diagnose Events_and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control Boards (2) .
Communicate and Interact
- Demonstrate Supervsory AbIity(3) * *
- DI Comply With and Use Tech. Specs, (3)
Notes.
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an SRDU.
(3) Only applicable to SROs, Instructions:
Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examineis to evaluate evoiy app//cable competency for every applicant.
ES-401, Rev. 9 BWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-1 Facility: BRUNSWICK Date of Exam: December 2010 RO K/A Category Points SRO-Only Points Tier Group KKKKKKAAIAAG A2 G* Total
=
1 2 3 4 5 6 1
= =
213=
- Total
- 1. i 34 20 3 4 7 Emergency&
2 T i T 71 T 7 1 2 3 Abnormal Plant N!A N/A Evolutions 4 5 6 4 4 27 4 6 10 TiorTotals
= = = = = = = = = =.
1 233231 22332 26 2 3 5
- 2. 11211111111 12 0 1 2 3 2
Plant Systems TlerTotals 4 5 3 4 2 3 3 4 4 3 38 3 5 8
- = = = = = = = = =
- 3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities 1 2 3 4 10 1 2 3 4 7 Categories 2 2 1 3 3 2 2 2
- 1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable K/A category are sampled withIn each tier of the RO and SRO.only outlines (La., except for one category In Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the Tier Totals In each K/A category shall not be less than two).
- 2. The point total for each group and tier In the proposed outline must match that specified In the table.
The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/-1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 poInts.
- 3. Systemslevolutlons within each group are Identified on the assocIated outline; systems or evolutions that do not-apply-at-the facility should-be-deleted-and-justitled;-operattonaily-important-sltespecific systems-that are not Included on the outline should be added. Refer to ES-401, Attachment 2, for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate K/A statements.
- 4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution In the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.
- 5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those K/As having an Importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.
- 6. Select SRO topics for Tiers I and 2 from the shaded systems and K/A categories.
- 7. The generic (0) KIAs in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the K/A Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system.
- 8. On the following pages, enter the K/A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics importance ratings (IRS) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled In other than Category A2 or G on the SRO-only exam, enter It on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note
- 1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.
- 9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the K/A catalog, and enter the K/A numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#) on Form ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to K/As that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43.
ES-401, REV 9 T1G1 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO Sf0 295001 AK3.O1 Partial or Complete Loss of Forced 3.4 3.6 F]
Core Flow Circulation / 1 & 4 C] C] C] C] H H [] [] C]
Reactor water level response 295003AK3.06 Partial or Complete Loss of AC! 6 3.7 3.7 C] [] ][] C] C] C] [] [] C] [1 [] Containment isolation 295004AA1 03 Partial or Total Loss of DC Pwr /6 3.4 3.6 LI Li C] C] C] ] C] C] C] C] A.C. electrical distribution 295005AA2.06 Main Turbine Generator Trip /3 2.6 2.7 C] C] C] C] C] C] C] [] C] C] Feedwater temperature 295006AK1.02 SCRAM Il 3.4 3.7 Shutdown margin C] C] C] C] C] C] fl C] C] C]
295016AK3.O1 Control Room Abandonment/7 4.1 4.2 C] C] {] C] Li C] El L: C] C] C] Reactor SCRAM 29501802.1.32 Partial or Total Loss of CCW /8 3.8 4.0 C] C] C] C] C] C] C] C] C] C] Ability to explain and apply all system limits and precautions.
295019AK2.11 Partial or Total Loss of Inst. Air/8 2.5 2.6 C] ] [] [J C] LI C] C] C] C] C] Rdwaste 295021Ak1.02 Loss of Shutdown Cooling! 4 3.3 3.4 )) C] f] C] H H C] C] C] C] C] Thermal stratification 295023AK2.03 Refueling Acc Cooling Mode / 8 3.4 3.6 Li LI C] C] C] C] C] L1 C] C] Radiation monitoring equipment 295024gK3.01 High Drywell Pressure /5 3.6 4.0 LI C] C] C] C] C] H H Li LI Drywell spray operation: Mark-l&ll Pagelot2 5/7/2010 10:57AM
ES-401, REV 9 T1G1 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR 1<1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 295025EK1 .04 1-ugh Reactor Pressure / 3 3.6 3.9 [] [] Li [] L] [] [] Li Decay heat generation 295026EK2.02 Suppression Pool High Water Temp.! 3.6 3.8 5
[J f} fl Li [] Li [] [] f [] [] Suppression pool spray: Plant-Specific 295028EK2.O1 High Drywell Temperature /5 3.7 4.1 Li Li Li [El Li Li Li Li Li [] Drywell spray: Mark-i&ll 295030G2.4.30 Low Suppression Pool Wtr Lvi / 5 2.7 4.1 Li [] ] Li [] [] [] J [] [] Knowledge of events related to system operations/status that must be reported to internal orginizatioris or outside agencies.
295031 EA1 .01 Reactor Low Water Level/ 2 4.4 4.4 Li Li Li Li Li I1 Li Li LI fl Low pressure coolant injection (RHR): Plant-Specific.
295037EA2.01 SCRAM Condition Present and Power 4.2 4.3 Reactor power Li Li [] Li [] Li [J Li Above APRM Downscale or Unknown
/1 295038EA1.07 High Off-site Release Rate/9 3.6 3.8 Li [] [] Li [] [] [J [ Li [] Control room ventilation: Plant-Specific 600000G2.4.6 Plant Fire On Site /8 3.7 4.7 [El j Li Li Li Li j Knowledge symptom based EOP mitigation strategies.
700000AA2.07 Generator Voltage and Electric Grid Distrurbancecs 3.6 4.0 Li [} [] Li Li C] Li 1 Li [1 [1 Operational status of engineered safely features Page 2 of 2 5/7/2010 10:57AM
ES-401, REV 9 T1G2 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki 1(2 K3 1(4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 295008G2.l.25 High Reactor Water Level /2 3.9 4.2 Li LI LI LI LI Li LI LI C] C] ]J Ability to interpret reference materials such as graphs, monographs and tables which contain performance data.
295014M1.06 Inadvertent Reactivity Addition! 1 3.3 3.4 C] LI C] LI LI C] ] LI C] LI LI Reactor/turbine pressure regulating system 29501 5AKI .02 Incomplete SCRAM) 1 3.9 4.1 Cooldown effects on reactor power C] C] Li [J C] C] LI LI LI 295020AA2.03 Inadvertent Cont. Isolation 15 & 7 3.7 3.7 Reactor power CI LI I C] C] Cl C] I C] C] LI 2950338<3.02 High Secondary Containment Area 3.5 3.6 C] C] j C] C] [] [] Li [] C] [] Reactor SCRAM Radiation Levels 19 2950340(3.05 Secondary Containment Ventilation 3.6 3.9 C] C] C] [C] C] C] C] [C] [C] [] Manual SCRAM and depressurization: Plant-Specific....
High Radiation /9 295036EK2.01 Secondary Containment High 3.1 3.2 C] [J C] C] C] C] C] C] C] C] C] Secondary containment equipment and floor drain system Sum p/Area Water Level / 5 Page 1 ot 1 5/7/2010 10:57AM
ES-401, REV 9 T2G1 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
Rb SRO 2030001(2.01 RHR/LPCI: Injection Mode 3.5 3.5 [] Li LI [1 Li C] Li Li [] C] Pumps 2030001(2.03 RHR!LPCI: Injection Mode 2.7 2.9 C] j [] C] [] C] C] C] C] [] C] Initiation logic 20500002.2.44 Shutdown Cooling 4.2 4.4 [J [] J [] [] [] Li C] C)) [] Ability to interpret control room indications to verify the status and operation of a system, and understand how operator actions and directives affect plant and system conditions 206000A3.01 HPCI 3.6 3.5 C] [] [] [] [] [] C)) C)) C] C] Turbine speed: BWR-2,3,4 206000A3.05 HPCI 4.3 4.3 Li Li C] Li Li LI Li Li [I LI Reactor water level: BWR-2,3,4 2090011(3.03 LPCS 2.9 3.0 C] C] [] Li Li Li C] Li Li Li Li Emergency generators 211 000K5.01 SLC 2.7 2.9 Effects of the moderator temperature coefficient of Li C] C] C] Li C] C] CI Li C]
reactivity on the boron 2110001(506 SLC 3.0 3.2 F] Tank level measurement C] C] Li Li C] C] Li C] Li 212000A4.07 RPS 4.0 3.9 Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li C] [i Li System status lights and alarms 215003A2.02 IRM 3.5 3.7 Li Li C] Li C] LI LI LI Li Li IRM flop condition 21500402.4.2 Source Range Monitor 4.5 4.6 C)) Li Li C] C] C] Li Li Li Li Knowledge of system set points, interlocks and automatic actions associated with EOP entry conditions.
Page 1 of 3 5/7/2010 10:57 AM
ES-401, REV 9 T2G1 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR 1(1 K2 K3 1(4 1(5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
no SRO 215005K4.08 APRM I LPRM 2.7 3.1 LI LI ] LI Li LI LI LI [I LI Sampling of overall core power in each APRM (accomplished through LPRM assignments and symmetrical rod patterns) 2170001(6.04 RCIC 3.5 3.5 Condensate storage and transfer system
2180001(4.04 ADS 3.5 3.6 [] [] LI LI LI [] { [] LI Insures adequate air supply to ADS valves: Plant-Specific 223002K1.08 PCIS/Nuclear Steam Supply Shutoff 3.4 3.5 [] LI LI [] [] LI LI Shutdown cooling systemlRHn 2390021(3.01 SRVs 3.9 4.0 Reactor pressure control
[] [] [] [] [] [] [] [1 {
2390021(3.03 SRVs 43 4.4 Ability to rapidly depressurize the reactor
[j [] [] [] [] [] [] [7 []
259002A4.01 Reactor Water Level Control 3.8 3.6 All individual component controllers in the manual mode LI LI LI LI C] LI LI LI LI LI 259002A4.1l Reactor Water Level Control 3.5 3.3 C] [7 C] High level lockout reset controls: Plant-Specific C]
261000A107 SGTS 2.8 2.9 LI LI C] C] LI LI [] LI LI LI LI SBGTS train temperature 2620011(2.01 AC Electrical Distribution 3.3 3.6 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI [] LI [7 Off-site sources of power 282002A3.01 UPS (AC/DC) 2.8 3,1 Transfer from preferred to alternate source Page 2 of 3 5/7/2010 10:57AM
ES-401, REV 9 T2G1 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME! SAFETY FUNCTION: lB Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 263000K5.01 DC Electrical Distribution 2.6 2.9 El El [] [] [1 El fl [] El] Hydrogen generation during battery charging..
264000A1.09 EDGs 3.0 3.1 El [1. [1 Li LI LI LI [] El [1 Maintaining minimum load on emergency generator (to prevent reverse power) 300000K1.02 Instrument Air 2.7 2.8 Service air
] El El El El Li [] Li El 400000A2.01 Component Cooling Water 3.3
ES-401, REV 9 T2G2 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES4O1-1 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
HO SRO 202002A4.O1 Recirculation Flow Control 3.3 3.1 [I F] ] F] F] F], F] F] F] ] [] MG sets 2040001(4.02 RWCU 2.7 2.9 Piping over-pressurization p,vtection: Plant-Specific
[I F] El F] F] El F]: F] [] [I 2140001(3.03 RPIS 3.1 3.2 F] F][J Li [IL] F] F] [IF] F] RMCS:Plant-Specific 215002A2.04 RBM 2.7 2.8 Li Li F] L] [1 [1 F] 1 F] F] [] Power suppy losses: BWR-3,4,5 223001G2.2.4 Primary CTMT and Aux. 3.6 3.6 F] F] F] F] F] [] [I [I F] [] (multi-unit) Ability to explain the variations in control board layouts, systems, instrumentation and procedural actions between units at a facility.
226001A1.04 RHR]LPCI: CTMT Spray Mode 3.3 3.6 F] F] F] F)) F] F] Suppression pool temperature: Mark-I-Il F] F] F] F]
2300001(2.02 RHR/LPCI: Tows/Pool SprayMode 2.8 2.9 El çj F]
- F] F] F] F] fl F] Pumps 2340001(6.01 Fuel Handling Equipment 2.7 3.2 F] F] F] F] F] F] F] F] F] [j EectricaI power 259001K304 Reactor Feedwater 25 25 F] F] Ji] F] U L H 11 El F] Li RWCU 2710001(5.08 2.7 2.7 F] F] F] F] lJ F] El Li F] Li El Catalytic recombination 2720001(1.08 Radiation Monitoring - 3.6 3.9 F] F] F] F] ii F] F] F] F] F] Reactor protection system Page lot 2 5/7/2010 10:57AM
ES4O1, REV 9 T2G2 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 1(4 NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 288000A3.O1 Plant Ventilation 3.8 3.8 j Isolation/initiation signals Page2of 2 517/2010 10:57AM
ES-401, REV 9 T3 BWR qXAMINATI0N OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR K1 K2 K3 K4 KS K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO G2.1.43 Conduct of operations 4.1 4.3 Ability to use procedures to determine the effects on
[j [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] J reactivity of plant changes G2.1.7 Conduct of operations 4.4 4.7 Ability to evaluate plant performance and make El El El C] C] El C] C] El []
operational judgments based on operating characteristics, reactor behavior and instrument interpretation.
G2.2.2 Equipment Control 4.6 4.1 Ci I El El El El El El Li Ability to manipulate the console controls as required to operate the facility between shutdown and designated power levels.
G22.3 Equipment Control 3.8 3.9 [] ] [] C] C] [] [] (multi-unit license) Knowledge of the design, procedural and operational differences between units.
G2.3.11 Radiation Control 3.8 4.3 [1 C] El El Ability to control radiation releases.
j [] [1 ] El [] ))
G2.3.12 Radiation Control 3.2 3.7 Ci El El [1 El El El El El El )) Knowledge of radiological safety principles pertaining to licensed operator duties G2.313 Radiation Control 3.4 3.8 Ti [1 C] El El El El El El El Knowledge of radiological safety procedures pertaining to licensed operator duties G2.4.16 Emergency Procedures/Plans 3.5 4. Knowledge of EOP implementation hierarchy and El El LI El El El El El El El [j coordination with other support procedures or guidelines.
G2439 Emergency Procedures/Plans 3.9 3.8 Li LI El El El El El El El El Knowledge of the R0s responsibilities in emergency plan implementation.
G2.4.6 Emergency Procedures/Plans 3.7 4.7 [1 LI [I El El El El El El El )) Knowledge symptom based EOP mitigation strategies. II Page 1 of 1 5/7/2010 10:57AM
ES-401, REV 9 SRO T1G1 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-4O11 KA NAME! SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 296004AA2.04 Partial or Total Loss of DC Pwr /6 3.2 3.3 Ci [] [] [] [] [] [] fj [] [] [] System lineups 295006G2.1.27 SCRAM T 3.9 4 [] [] Ci [] Ci [] Ci Ci Knowledge of system purpose and or function.
29O16G2.4.31 Control Room Abandonment/ 7 4.2 4.1 fl H J Ci Ci Knowledge of annunciators alarms, indications or response procedures 295019G2.4.18 Partial or Total Loss of Inst. Air / 8 3.3 Knowledge of the specific bases for EOPs.
4.0 Ci Ci Ci C] Ci LI Ci Ci Ci Ci 295023G2.1.20 Refueling Acc Cooling Mode / 8 4,6 4.6 Ability to execute procedure steps.
C] LI [] [] [J [] [] Ci Ci Ci 295028EA2.O1 High Drywell Temperature / 5 4.0 4.1 C] C] Ci Ci [] Ci C] C] C] Drywell temperature 295037EA2.05 SCRAM Condition Present and Power 4.2 4.3 Control rod position Above APRM Downscale or Unknown
[] C] C] Ci Ci C] Ci C] Ci C]
/1 Page 1 of 1 5/7/2010 10:57AM
ES-401, REV 9 SRO T1G2 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES4O1-1 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 296008G2.2.38 High Reactor Water Level / 2 3.6 4.5 [] [] [] ] [] [] Knowledge of conditions and limitations in the facility license.
295020G2.2.40 Inadvertent Coat. Isolation /5 & 7 3.4 4.7 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Ability to apply technical specifications for a system.
295034EA2.02 Secondary Containment Ventilation 3.7 4.2 High Radiation / 9 LI LI LI Cause of high radiation levels Page 1 of 1 517/2010 10:57AM
ES-401, REV 9 SRO T2G1 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Ki 1(2 K3 1(4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 0 TOPIC:
RO SRO 20300002.4.21 Rl-IR/LPCI: Injection Mode 4.0 4.6 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Knowledge of the parameters and logic used to assess the status of safety functions 21500502.1.20 APRM / LPRM 4.6 4.6 Ability to execute procedure steps.
U [1 U [] [] [] [] []
261000A2.05 SGTS 3.0 3.1 [] [] j [] [] [3 [3 [3 [] [3 Fan trips 263000A2.02 DC Electrical Distribution 2.6 2.9 [3 [] [] [] [3 [3 [3 [] [3 [] Loss of ventilation during charging 40000002.1.25 Component Cooling Water 3.9 4.2 [j] [3 [] [] [3 [3 [] [3 [3 [3 Ability to interpret reference materials such as graphs, monographs and tables which contain performance data.
Page 1 of 1 5/7/2010 10:57AM
ES-401, REV 9 SRO T2G2 BWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR KI K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 233000G2.2.37 Fuel Pool Cooling/Cleanup 3.6 4.6 [] fl [] [] [] Ability to determine operability and/or availability ot safety related equipment 239001 (32.2.3 Main and Reheat Steam 3.8 3.9 [] f [] [] [] [] (multi-unit license) Knowledge of the design, procedural and operational differences between units.
288000A2.01 Plant Ventilation 3.3 3.4 fJ J J High drywell pressure: Plant-Specific Page lof 1 511/2010 10:57AM
ES-401, REV 9 SRO T3 BW EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-1 1(6. NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION: IR Kl K2 K3 K4 KS K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO G2.1 .23 Conduct of operations 4.3 4.4 [] [J [] [] [] Li Ability to perform specific system and integrated plant procedures during all modes of plant operation.
02.1.3 Conduct of operations 3.7 3.9 [] L] [] LI [] [] [] [] [] Knowledge of shift or short term relief turnover practices.
02.2.23 Equipment Control 3.1 4.6 [] [ [] [] [] [] [] fl [] Ability to track Technical Specification limiting conditions for operations.
G2.2.43 Equipment Control 3.0 3.3 [] [] LI LI LI LI LI [] [] [] Knowledge of the process used to track inoperable alarms 02.3.14 Radiation Control 3.4 3.8 j Knowledge of radiation or contamination hazards that may arise during normal, abnormal, or emergency conditions or activities 02.3.5 Radiation Control 2.9 2.9 [] [] Ability to use radiation monitoring systems
[]
02.4.28 Emergency Procedures/Plans 3.2 4.1 El LI LI LI LI Li Li Li LI I] Knowledge of procedures relating to emergency response to sabotage.
Page 1 of 1 5/7/2010 10:57AM
I ES-401, Rev. 9 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Brunswick 201 0-302 Tier I Randomly Selected Reason for Rejection Group K/A There were no rejected KAs for this exam
Ill (I
C CD m
C 3
0 0
C)
CD C,
Cl, 0
3 m
LI) 0
ii more tnan u percent OT me suomittea test items çwnn tne operating test ana l-U/h(O written exams assessea separateiy requirea repiacement or signiricant moaincation, mne report shall include a factual description of the test item changes (observations), including the number and types of test items replaced and/or significantly modified as a result of the joint NRC and facility licensee examination review process. The report shall also note that the overall submittal was outside the acceptable quality range expected by the NRC and that future examination submittals should incorporate any lessons learned from this effort.
To be considered a significantly modified question, at least one pertinent condition in the stem and at least one distractor must be changed from the original bank question. Changing the conditions in the stem such that one of the three distractors in the original question becomes the correct answer would also be considered a significant modification ES-401 2 Form ES-401-9
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOU (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia / Back- 0= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus] Dist. Link units ward K/A Only I F 2 215005 K4.08 (RO) Appears to meet the KA.
(16) 2 F 2 X 218000 K4.04 (RO) Appears to meet the KA. C is not plausible. If ONLY the ADS SRVs have backup N2 then how could ALL SRVs be equipped (18) S w/ accumulators on a loss of N2 backup? Are all 11 SRVs also ADS valves?
9/13/10, Reviewed w/licensee and accepted reasoning for C being plausible.
3 F 2 223001 02.2.4 (RO) Appears to meet the KA. Poor sentence structure.
(19) Rewrite to say and auto starts its/their associated cooler fan(s).
9/13/10, Reviewed w/Iicensee. Sentence structure is OK as is.
4 F 2 X 214000 K3.03 (RO) Appears to meet the KA. C is not plausible. Inserting (12) a scram is always going to work if the other work. C does not contain this S
item, therefore its not plausible. Full core display is lost, is there any other method to determine rod position?
9/13/10, Reviewed w/licensee. Licensee agreed to change distractor C to include insert a scram and 5 F 3 259002 A4.1 1 (RO) Appears to meet the KA.
(28) . S Question is confusing as written. Do the operators read LI in the CR (shouldnt this be LI C32-R606)? The stem states LT level. Also change the question stem to state: Which one logic and the status of the RFP A & B High Level status lights? Make sure the title is exactly as on the board. RFP A & B High Level or RRP A & B High Level Trip/Reset.
9/13/10, Reviewed w/licensee. Licensee agreed to reword question to match exact MCR labeling. Also to rephrase question such that no one could make assumption that level was initially high on A LT and therefore that distractor B could also be a correct answer.
IT more tnan u percent or me suomittea test items çwitn mne operating test ana U/hU written exams assessea separateiy requirea repiacement or signiricant moaiTication, tne report shall include a factual description of the test item changes (observations), including the number and types of test items replaced and/or significantly modified as a result of the joint NRC and facility licensee examination review process. The report shall also note that the overall submittal was outside the acceptable quality range expected by the NRC and that future examination submittals should incorporate any lessons learned from this effort.
To be considered a significantly modified question, at least one pertinent condition in the stem and at least one distractor must be changed from the original bank question. Changing the conditions in the stem such that one of the three distractors in the original question becomes the correct answer would also be considered a significant modification
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOKLOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only SRO H 3 X S295008 02.2.38 (SRO) Appears to meet the KA.
1 S The question is teaching in the stem. Remove the 2 nd paragraph from the (85) stem and change the 3r paragraph to say WOOF is the reason a Reactor scram initiated from a main turbine trip is required...?
9/13/10, Reviewed w/licensee. Licensee agreed to remove 2 nd sentence from the stem of the question and to look at replacing distractor A with something that is relevant to a Rx scram condition.
11/17/10 Upon further review, agreed with the licensee to leave the question as is.
SRO S S295028 A2.01 (SRO) Appears to meet the KA.
2 (90)
SRO S295034 A2.02 Appears to meet the KA.
Verify that the APP contains same direction for new & irradiated fuel.
(91) . .
9/13/10, Reviewed with licensee, APP contains same guidance for new/irradiated fuel bundle damage.
11/17/10 0(1) & 0(2) answer given away by Q#88 handout. Question changed for a new fuel bundle. This changed the answer to A. RX BLDG ROOM VENT RAD HIGH removed from the stem of the question.
SRO S215005 G2.1.20 Appears to meet the KA.
S Change the word supplemental actibns to supplementary actions to (77) . match the section of the procedure.
9/1 3/1 0, Reviewed w/licensee. Licensee agreed to the change noted.
ii more tnan u percent OT tne suomitteo test items çwitn tne operating test ana uioru written exams assessec separateiy requirea repiacement or signiricant moairication, me report shall include a factual description of the test item changes (observations), including the number and types of test items replaced and/or significantly modified as a result of the joint NRC and facility licensee examination review process. The report shall also note that the overall submittal was outside the acceptable quality range expected by the NRC and that future examination submittals should incorporate any lessons learned from this effort.
To be considered a significantly modified question, at least one pertinent condition in the stem and at least one distractor must be changed from the original bank question. Changing the conditions in the stem such that one of the three distractors in the original question becomes the correct answer would also be considered a significant modification
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOKLOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia / Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only SRO H X U S263000 A2.02 Appears to meet the KA.
5 E Distractors B(2) and 0(2) are not plausible. Suggested the licensee (81) rewrite the nd 2
question to ask Which one of the following procedures contains the steps for mitigating the event? Also asked the licensee to consider adding more information to the stem to make the 2 distractor more plausible.
9/13/10, Reviewed w/licensee. Licensee agreed to the change noted.
11/12/10, The question should be broken into two questions. Is currently a run on sentence?
11/17/10 Changed the stem to 2 sentences as noted, added the outside air temperature of 60 degrees F to add plausibility to room temperature choices.
I The questiois from here up were submitted fo early review and will not count as UNSATs unless they are left uncorrected on the final submittal.
1 H S 11/17/10-Appears to meet the KA.
Originally evaluated as a OFES exam question. Upon review with the licensee the question is acceptable as is because the normal correlation for pump laws does not apply because there is a constant 70 volts per HZ relationship.
2 F S Appears to meet the KA.
3 F S Appears to meet the KA.
4 F S Appears to meet the KA. .
5 H S Appears to meet the KA.
ii more tnan u percent or tne suomittea test items (Wfl tne operating test ana rcu/iu written exams assessea separateiy requirea repiacement or significant moaincauon, tne report shall include a factual description of the test item changes (observations), including the number and types of test items replaced and/or significantly modified as a result of the joint NRC and facility licensee examination review process. The report shall also note that the overall submittal was outside the acceptable quality range expected by the NRC and that future examination submittals should incorporate any lessons learned from this effort.
To be considered a significantly modified question, at least one pertinent condition in the stem and at least one distractor must be changed from the original bank question. Changing the conditions in the stem such that one of the three distractors in the original question becomes the correct answer would also be considered a significant modification
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 6 H E Appears to meet the KA. B& C does not match the physics for this.
7 H E Appears to meet the KA. The 1 answer can be deduced from the 2 question.
S 1 1/1 7/10 Changed the question so that no operator action is required for HPCI to auto inject (i.e. the answer is the same but for a different reason).
8 H E Appears to meet the KA. Distractor D is not plausible.
S 11/22/10 Changed distractor D from DG1 Output breaker has no control power to alternate control power must be manually transferred, 9 H E Appears to meet the KA.
S 11/18/10 Reworded the answer choice to make symmetrical with other choices.
Instead of saying Allowing a low pressure ECCS injection following an ADS actuation. The new choice states, ADS actuation with low pressure ECCS injection.
10 H S Appears to meet the KA.
11 H S Appears to meet the KA.
12 See S above 13 H E Appears to meet the KA. A(2) & C(2) not plausible.
1 S 11/22/10 Changed the 2w,part of the question to ask if the ARP procedure is used to resolve the issue.
14 H S Appears to meet the KA.
15 H E Appears to meet the KA. C & D should not be and, should be OR.
5 11/17/10 - Changed as noted above.
it more man u percent OT tne suomirtea test items çwitn me operating test ana -cu,ri-cu written exams assessea separateiy requirea repiacement or signincant moaitication, me report shall include a factual description of the test item changes (observations), including the number and types of test items replaced and/or significantly modified as a result of the joint NRC and facility licensee examination review process. The report shall also note that the overall submittal was outside the acceptable quality range expected by the NRC and that future examination submittals should incorporate any lessons learned from this effort.
To be considered a significantly modified question, at least one pertinent condition in the stem and at least one distractor must be changed from the original bank question. Changing the conditions in the stem such that one of the three distractors in the original question becomes the correct answer would also be considered a significant modification
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
04 [OK LO[j (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia 4/ Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 16 See S above 17 H E Appears to meet the KA. Requested licensee to change pressure from 176# to 1 704 to increase the plausibility of the distracters.
11/23/10 Licensee agreed to the change noted.
18 See above 19 See above 20 H S Appears to meet the KA.
21 H S Appears to meet the KA.
22 F S Appears to meet the KA.
23 F S Appears to meet the KA.
24 H S Appears to meet the KA.
25 H S Appears to meet the KA.
26 F S Appears to meet the KA.
27 H S Appears to meet the KA.
28 See S Appears to meet the KA.
above 29 H S Appears to meet the KA.
30 F S Appears to meet the KA.
31 H S Appears to meet the KA.
it more man u percent. or me suDmneo test items twi:n tne ocerating test ano ru/au written exams assesseo separa:eiy) requirea repiacement or significant moomcauon, me repoo shall include a factual qescriotion of the test item changes (observations), including the number and types of test items replaced and/or sgnificantly modified as a result of the joint NRC and facility licensee examination review process. The report shall aiso note that the overall submittal was outside the acceptable quality range expected by the NRC and that future examination submittals should incorporate any lessons learned from this effort.
To be considered a significantly modified question, at least one pertinent condition in the stem and at least one distractor must be changed from the original bank question. Changing the conditions in the stem such that one of the three distractors in the original question becomes the correct answer would also be considered a significant modification
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/FICred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO B/MIN U/E/S Explanation Focus Link units ward K/A Only 32 F E Appears to meet the KA. There is no mention of a LOCA in the question to match the distracters.
s 11/26/10 The distractor explanation removed the LOCA criteria that did not apply to the conditions given.
33 H S Appears to meet the KA.
F S Appears to meet the KA.
35 H S Appears to meet the KA.
36 H S Appears to meet the KA.
37 F B Appears to meet the KA. A(2) does not appear plausible.
S 1 1/1 7/10 Reworded distractors to ask what happens to water level in the shroud vs the downcomer region.
38 H S Appears to meet the KA.
39 F S Appears to meet the KA.
40 H S Appears to meet the KA.
41 F S Appears to meet the KA.
42 H S Appears to meet the KA.
43 H .
U Appears to meet the KA. Distractors B& C do not appear plausible.
S 11/17/10 Reworded question to ask for control valve status and thereby eliminating concern over plausibility.
44 F E Appears to meet the KA.
5 Choice B & C plausibility distractors backwards.
45 H E Appears to meet the KA. B(2) is not plausible.
5 11/23/10 Licensee reworded B(2) to make acceptable.
46 F S Appears to meet the KA.
it more tnan u percent or tne suomitteo test items çwitn tne operating test ano tuit-tu written exams assesseo separateiy requirea repiacement or signiricant mooirication, tne report shall include a factual description of the test item changes (observations), including the number and types of test items replaced and/or significantly modified as a result of the joint NRC and facility licensee examination review process. The report shall also note that the overall submittal was outside the acceptable quality range expected by the NRC and that future examination submittals should incorporate any lessons learned from this effort.
To be considered a significantly modified question, at least one pertinent condition in the stem and at least one distractor must be changed from the original bank question. Changing the conditions in the stem such that one of the three distractors in the original question becomes the correct answer would also be considered a significant modification
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
O# LOK LOU (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 47 F E Appears to meet the KA. Requested A & B be changed from open to closed.
s 11/17/10 Changed distractors as noted.
48 H S Appears to meet the KA.
49 F U Appears to meet the KA. A(2) & 0(2) are not correct, therefore there is no correct answer.
50 F S Appears to meet the KA.
51 F S Appears to meet the KA.
52 F E Appears to meet the KA. Request the licensee change the times for B &
s D to increase plausibility.
1 1/1 7/10 Changes noted made by licensee.
53 F E Appears to meet the KA. Requested licensee change D to white.
S 1 1/1 7/10 Changes noted made by licensee.
54 H E Appears to meet the KA. Requested licensee change stem from -21 to
+20.
s 11/17/10 Changes noted made by licensee.
55 F S Appears to meet the KA.
56 F S Appears to meet the KA.
57 F S Appears to meet the KA.
58 F S Appears to meet the KA.
59 F S Appears to meet the KA.
60 H S Appears to meet the KA.
61 F S Appears to meet the KA.
it more tnan u percentortne suomittea test items çwitn me operating test ano ru/ru written exams assessea separateiy requireo repiacement or signiricant moairication, me report shall include a factual description of the test item changes (observations), including the number and types of test items replaced and/or significantly modified as a result of the joint NRC and facility licensee examination review process. The report shall also note that the overall submittal was outside the acceptable quality range expected by the NRC and that future examination submittals should incorporate any lessons learned from this effort.
To be considered a significantly modified question, at least one pertinent condition in the stem and at least one distractor must be changed from the original bank question. Changing the conditions in the stem such that one of the three distractors in the original question becomes the correct answer would also be considered a significant modification
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 62 H E Appears to meet the KA. Distractor C is not plausible. It is not an auto isolation valve.
Changed distractor C to the IA. hdr crosstie valve. It is an auto isolation valve.
63 H S Appears to meet the KA.
64 H . . S Appears to meet the KA.
65 H S Appears to meet the KA.
66 H S Appears to meet the KA.
67 F S Appears to meet the KA.
68 H S Appears to meet the KA.
69 F S Appears to meet the KA.
70 H S Appears to meet the KA.
71 H S Appears to meet the KA.
72 F S Appears to meet the KA.
73 F S Appears to meet the KA.
74 E Appears to meet the KA.
. S Requested A(2) & B(2) be changed from EAL to ENF to make them more plausible.
75 .* U Appears to meet the KA. This question is at the SRO level not at the RD level.
s 1 1/1 7/10 The licensee wrote a new question that meet the KA criteria and is at the RD level.
it more tnan u percent or tne suomitteo test items çwitn tne operating test ano u/ru written exams assesseo separateiy requireo repiacement or signiricant mooirication, tne report shall include a factual description of the test item changes (observations), including the number and types of test items replaced and/or significantly modified as a result of the joint NRC and facility licensee examination review process. The report shaH also note that the overall submittal was outside the acceptable quality range expected by the NRC and that future examination submittals should incorporate any lessons learned from this effort.
To be considered a significantly modified question, at least one pertinent condition in the stem and at least one distractor must be changed from the original bank question. Changing the conditions in the stem such that one of the three distractors in the original question becomes the correct answer would also be considered a significant modification
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOKLOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- 0= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 76 H X Appears to meet the KA. Al & Bl do not appear plausible.
S 11/17/10 Changed stem to 2A RHR & 2A CS pump, loop B demin is not available. Only FP Cooling is available and it goes to A loop only.
Reworded the question to ask whether or not you need to stop the pump or not. The pump can be stopped because it is not needed for adequate core cooling.
77 See S above 78 H S Appears to meet the KA.
79 F S Appears to meet the KA 5 11/17/10 Revised the stem to simplify the question. It now asks, is U-i / U-2 MT Bypass System Operable orlnoperable.
80 H S Appears to meet the KA S 11/17/10 Added minimum to the first half of the question to prevent the incorrect answer from being a subset of the correct choice and therefore the applicant could deduce that the higher temperature is always the correct answer.
81 See above 82 H S Appears to meet the KA 83 H , S Appears to meet the KA 81 F S Appears to meet the KA. A is not plausible. It is not a BOP system S 11/17/10 Changed distractor A to Intake Structure.
85 See above 86 H S Appears to meet the KA
IT more tnan u percent CT me suominea test items çwitn tne operating test ana rcuimu written exams assessea separateiy requireo repiacement or signiican: moairication. tne report shall include a factual description of the test item changes (observations), including the number and types of test items replaced and/or significantly modified as a result of the joint NRC and facility licensee examination review process. The report shall also note that the overall submittal was outside the acceptable quality range expected by the NRC and that future examination submittals should incorporate any lessons learned from this effort.
To be considered a significantly modified question, at least one pertinent condition in the stem and at least one distractor must be changed from the original bank question. Changing the conditions in the stem such that one of the three distractors in the original question becomes the correct answer would also be considered a significant modification
- 1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOK L0D (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only 87 H Appears to meet the KA S 11/17/10 Changed stem wording to say AW 88 H S Appears to meet the KA 89 L S Appears to meet the KA 90 See above 91 See above 92 H E Appears to meet the KA.
RPS Lights removed from the stem. This will enhance the plausibility of A
, distractor.
93 H E Appears to meet the KA.
5 Rewrote question to shorten distractor length.
94 H t4 Appears to meet the KA.
C & D are not plausible, a surveillance procedure does not contain guidance on plant operations.
. 11/17/10Changed C & D to GP-12, Power procedure.
95 H E Two part question not needed. The 1° part of each distractor is the same.
Removed the 1 v
part of each distractor.
11/17/10 Changes made as noted.
96 H S 97 L S
IT more man u percent or me suomitteo test items çwitn tne operating test anti hU/i-U written exams assesseo separateiy requireo repiacement or signincant mooirication, me report shall include a factual description of the test item changes (observations), including the number and types of test items replaced and/or significantly modified as a result of the joint NRC and facility licensee examination review process. The report shall also note that the overall submittal was outside the acceptable quality range expected by the NRC and that future examination submittals should incorporate any lessons learned from this effort To be considered a significantly modified question, at least one pertinent condition in the stem and at least one distractor must be changed from the original bank question. Changing the conditions in the stem such that one of the three distractors in the original question becomes the correct answer would also be considered a significant modification
- 1. 2 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7. 8.
Q# LOKOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO B/M/N U/E/S Explanation Focus Dst. Link units ward K/A Only 98 H E The i part is based on a procedure caution. This is RO knowledge. The 2 part of each distractor requires SRO knowledge.
11/17/10 The stem has been changed to give the RPV press (105#)to require interpretation of plant Mode. This changed the answer to correlate to Mode 4.
99 L E 11/17/10 Requested stem changed from Barrier(s) that has (have) been lost to Loss or Potential Loss Changes made as noted.
100 L S
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Brunswick Date of Exam: 12/20/2010 Exam Level: RO* SRO*
Initials Item Description a b c
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading lfl/,7 .L
- 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3. Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, p) as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
- 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training YVV tJc deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date ICAL rY). /-2_-
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
J(
(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.