Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARL-2011-006, License Amendment Request No. 209; Relocation of Cycle Specific Parameters to the Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)2011-02-21021 February 2011
License Amendment Request No. 209; Relocation of Cycle Specific Parameters to the Core Operating Limits Report (COLR)
Project stage: Request
ML1108806762011-03-29029 March 2011
Relocation of Cycle Specific Parameters to the Core Operating Limits Report License Amendment Request
Project stage: Other
L-2011-251, Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request No. 209, Relocation of Cycle Specific Parameters to the Core Operating Limits Report2011-07-21021 July 2011
Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request No. 209, Relocation of Cycle Specific Parameters to the Core Operating Limits Report
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML11307A2672011-10-28028 October 2011
Invensys Operations Management Submittal to Support License Amendment Request from PG&E for Replacement of the Eagle 21 Process Protection System at Diablo Canyon Power Plant
Project stage: Request
05000275/LER-2011-006, For Diablo Canyon, Unit 1, Regarding Loss of Control Room Envelope Due to the Work Control Shift Foreman Incorrectly Authorizing Removal of a Blank Flange2011-10-28028 October 2011
For Diablo Canyon, Unit 1, Regarding Loss of Control Room Envelope Due to the Work Control Shift Foreman Incorrectly Authorizing Removal of a Blank Flange
Project stage: Request
ML1133403042011-12-12012 December 2011
Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure, 10/28/11 Affidavit Executed by R. Shaffer, Invensys Operations Management, 4 Software Requirements Specification Documents
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
ML12003A1332012-02-24024 February 2012
Issuance of Amendments Regarding Relocation of Cycle Specific Parameters to the Core Operating Limits Report
Project stage: Approval
L-2012-118, Response to NRC ITSB RAI Regarding Clean TS Changes for EPU LAR No. 205 and Incorporation of Amendments 247 and 243 TS Changes on Relocation of Cycle Specific Parameters to the Core Operating Limits Report2012-03-15015 March 2012
Response to NRC ITSB RAI Regarding Clean TS Changes for EPU LAR No. 205 and Incorporation of Amendments 247 and 243 TS Changes on Relocation of Cycle Specific Parameters to the Core Operating Limits Report
Project stage: Other
L-2012-115, Review Comments on Safety Evaluation Report and Technical Specifications for Amendments 247 and 243, Relocation of Cycle Specific Parameters to the Core Operating Limits Report (Colr)2012-03-16016 March 2012
Review Comments on Safety Evaluation Report and Technical Specifications for Amendments 247 and 243, Relocation of Cycle Specific Parameters to the Core Operating Limits Report (Colr)
Project stage: Other
ML12101A0852012-04-12012 April 2012
Correction of Amendment Nos. 247 and 243 Regarding Relocation of Cycle Specific Parameters to the Core Operating Limits Report
Project stage: Other
2011-07-21
[Table View] |
Text
From:
Paige, Jason Sent:
Tuesday, March 29, 2011 3:46 PM To:
Hanek, Olga; Tomonto, Bob Cc:
Tiemann, Philip; Abbott, Liz; Abbatiello, Tom; Hoffman, Jack
Subject:
ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: Relocation of Cycle Specific Parameters to the Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) LAR (ME5721 and ME5722)
SUBJECT:
TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 AND 4: RELOCATION OF CYCLE SPECIFIC PARAMETERS TO THE CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST (TAC NOS. ME5721 AND ME5722)
By letter dated February 21, 2011, Florida Power & Light Company submitted a license amendment for Turkey point, Units 3 and 4. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.
The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Jason Paige, Turkey Point Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: (301) 415-5888
