ML110140212

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Initial Exam 2010-301 Final Administrative Documents
ML110140212
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar 
Issue date: 10/19/2010
From:
NRC/RGN-II
To:
Tennessee Valley Authority
References
50-390/10-301
Download: ML110140212 (37)
v • d • e


Text

ES-20 1 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-20 1-1 Facility:

2010 Watts Bar Date of Examination:

8/23/2010 Facility NRC Examinations Developed by:

Written

/ Operating Test Chief Target Date*

Task Description (Reference)

Examiner s Initials

-180 1.

Examination administration date confirmed (C. 1.a; C.2.a and b) 1 1/18/2009

-120 2.

NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C. 1.d; C.2.e) 3/24/2010

-120 3.

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 3/24/2010

-120 4.

Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 3/29/20 10

[-90]

[5.

Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)]

7/09/2010

{-75}

6.

Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES 301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-ls, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as 6/09/2010 applicable (C.1.e and f C.3.d)

{-70}

{7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility 6/19/20 10 licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

{-45}

8.

Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, 7/9/2010 ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and (7/02/2010) h; C.3.d)

-30 9.

Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202) 7/23/2010

-14

10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES.-202) 8/9/2010

-14 1 1. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review 8/9/2010 (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14

12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C. 1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) 8/9/2010

-7

13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7

14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if>10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent 8/16/20 10 (C.2.i;_Attachment 4;_ES-202,_C.2.e;_ES-204)

-7

15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee 8/16/2010 (C.3.k)

-7

16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to 8/16/20 10 NRC examiners (C.3.i)

Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201 -2 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination:

08/23/2010 Initials Item Task Description

a b

c#

W R

T E

N a.

Verity that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

b.

Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with n/a n/a n/a Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

c.

Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a d.

Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.

a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, 5

S and major transients.

M b.

Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number u

and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L

without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using jW-A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T

from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c.

To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-3D 1-4 and described in Appendix D.

3.

a.

Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W

distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I

(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form 4g

T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)

/

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b.

Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified r

(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c.

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix f34. 3 of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4.

a.

Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

s b.

Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

c.

Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

R d.

Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

A L

e.

Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

r tedp)ae/,Signature Date

a. Author John B. Roden /

/UZAW-

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

Steven R. Smith!

I2 /1

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

rEPA1Y ). LsicA /,

8J/2ljo

d. NRC Supervisor AALJr.M/1D 1

U.,uAj/,I (j_

Th Note:

  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines OUTJ) e-Wrtlev 4f4 j

- Lieee_

1 i/ig /xq4

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of

as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

2. Ioj4-ii
3. 3j
4. CiPT
5. 4).1 6S-tv.J T cc.Y-.

7.4L)*iilg eL

8. 4*k.5 Satiej 9.

I

(

11.S1.e...J1_

12. F i 13.MtCt44.A LLiL41..,

14.

___c -;

1iafri.

.iViiio_

II? /10 i(fr i-7rb c

.l4O?

iØ-.

sill/Id I

ES-201, Page 27 of 28 PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY Baw LA)rl4cA-E)A1 c..a(Li1(t Ei,vuL TO -

(1 6 f2 i,.jt1 SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE fjIiij A

&E P4c 5 (6 RecJor E (A:

orP $ t(.L1%_ /Cpø,I tP° 5v-.L1--

9rt(.h

/7a f\\

JPb AcctfA rtA

/.A1..i.IJ1 _.Jif LLO 1 j.r AIr7 jC()

oIz,io fç9 7

15.

U NOTES:

Lyi i.A/

2.

SG (jt

. Pe Pci( I

-I S

-4 Q

1.

PT-E11kgtQn 1 riodedge that I tve accp1red speázed bio*I1ge aoL* the NRC Jcemsrg cx ina.s sdieduled ro the week(s)oOj as,I2e e of rey 1ize..

I aee I vI not mcny aiy iifonnabon aboat Vest exaji ions to iy peror who he not been adtwrtzed by (be NRC dilat eaniner.

I ursIand that I ais not to (nstiuct, e*ie, or çicvide pef1ormare eIiadc k those appcm1 1ed to be ad*ed these evn4o oiii th Iate w Øeeon Of e1ra*3n aW3. eKota sedficaly rioted bdow and authorized by the FC (eq., ading as a sni4ax booth opeM or comnszicabt acc*abIe if the fridhbid cIo not seed th arng cc* or pKlvi or Ei*ect feedback). Fudhermre I an aw Of tie pysk seewity meawr aid requrementa( dociited ii the larity kciss pmcedixes) aid urderslaidt OtO* ci the ithbons Qfiti ateement may reLit ii canan of eie eaniiaaI)ons anilfor an encernerd ion against me or the faAtyee. I WV immea1e)y rqtJri to tay cgenenta tha NRC cte( ezarne, any caIiiis or suggmeflons th einaon scciatty may hw?e been cornpiomLd.

2.

P.-riai To the best cK esy kmv4edae, I cid nO CIQte Ia any iieJthCriz petsoia fomaboi czwzrnrig the NRCen exaiffioms adnitWeied dubig (he seek(s)

Frcn the de lul (enlered mb thsecait eemtun the Comp]etkri Of i*#thm kririd(rn. I dli not Of F s,a appkits wcie niiired these bcensing ecar1 as &pecificafly noied bdow and authodzed b the NRC.

51 0

I D

I-PmNTED FMJ, 1L 3

ia)4$

o,v 4.

5. ø1I(e (> i 1

!j E.-ripJ t 7.

11 tiL i3 4da..

a.

_-._,L 12.

L cii L&1 ba,n L)rac4 Enm 14?QJlfJt.

b P 5JjIW4%1f ES-2D1, Paje 27 of 28

-201 Ennion Security Agreement F0m ES.Z)14 JOB TiTLE I REOlILITV SiGNATURE (1)

MLU LL IWrE SIGNA (2)

DAlE NOTE 1 7 iC I

-z

.abil.

Or-.f 4Ic4_4j,1.a44 p

ifm fJ - --J. 11, iiPS rJ I

D?c S..

4r fl.Mk.e*cS A LeCs 1

i Mc.U f(

ta 14.____________

LW uøtI.J

/i_Z7

TES 1

1kç.h Io

ES-201 Examination Security Aqreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of ao k as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowinglydivulge any Information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that (am not to lnstruct evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those appbcants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or corhrnunicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreetnent may result in canceation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromIsed 2.

Post-Examination PRINTED NAME 3.ThKN zD7 4.OErNpor)

5. I Gcl 6$rrj tfcY-.

ES-201, Page 27 of 28 To the beat of my knoir4edq I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) ofz34 1

& From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY

&c1w L&c:1 bav LA)r14c4 EYtM wQiuiA..

c,,,,, iiL4rfl..

f1 6.

SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2) iliqic.,

DATE NOTE 11? 1 w k 4 g: -

bg1 1h 1

yV p,4çAii 7.

SW,. e L_

F 4

k E

8. 1.qL R

/

9.

ri P.S 1

c-ab.

9_7kJ

.1 o

.t4LJ-syhn f-. /).

iimi o-T-PS gf-7iu

12. t%.0 -;

J Pc 5..

13.MM

.i 1

,4o Aca.U rLiq.

14. Ada. kes l.AD vphJci-

.L 1e

/

cI.qjLr ta*

p

ls ES-201

Exaniir*aticm ScityAgreoment Forn ES-2014 I.

kcn,wedge that ve arirJ

-wi tbe NRC nigan cdud f;tho o

as o the da af sufa.

I aroo that V TOt vuI any e eto o any peis *lio l2; nC3Lbi oecI by the NRC cNeI oxaniner.

I Irad that I mi to irnI, orjide performance eIbad to thoec ap*ani sdeduIed to be acthibeied these In!Jn e iatofle from this date trll Mrnetisn at exarrttori ath rsat1on, exoepta5 speccaIty ioted betow and aulhorizd by the NRC

(

gjr btj oper(or or c macatvr is acpIabIe W he iniduat does not sabct the taki1n ccnti1 or pide dc1 or Intfre1 teeftavk). Ftmioe, I am w.are a the physkseiry riaswes and reqLnremen (adoiznited ii the faoity oise&s procedures) and ji vioon of the ndJr,r of Lh sgreamanty rest frraIatn of the cmInaJ andk an enrus-it aztIoii aaat re oi ihe facyene I fl medat&y repot to taclity management or the NRC dual euiinei an inc&ations or suestions ttt ean*on culty my e been iaiisad.

2.

P3t-Earniir) of wkyP c.[f not div*e to v WTZed oerons env hiforrna1m cucwsnq the NRC liceneing examiraticns nbislared v()

F !e d&e t! eeei !n!o e uq.-.

oexenrr aorp; e!e, or pr4r!e xfrrinnncrrk to those apcarE who ee anninstoredtho 1k*nig e iixor, except as sfLcafly no&d b&ow and crized i the NRC, ES-201, Page 27 of 28 IIIIiG 1 7 Jj fF&E ?

C) a 0

PRINTED NAfE i,,wi1i Llarçj 2.

3-4r3 B a 4.OPr N.6por

&.iIc.. ?itJi..

65q.J1 L-k.Aic.

7.L)(bk..

JOS TITLE I RESPOf4SLiTY

&JLbY EJV L43!

4 A

E)Jfl LIJDa1j:

cIiIILATat 1t.-P kf DATE S1GNAIU (2)

DATE NOTE GNATURE (1)

Ljjj 91, r//

-3 c)

I.

r.,

J SvviC

  • 1 B L4s S ZcJ.r

jj4-5

,-k--1TWi-c-J 4,i_4.

1O.R 1

A

£li/ln I L,..._- Pn 1Lei 1

_ 7 iL (t i I I?, &-i OL1.q 4P) r L 7

3 0

A 4%a Aecd TL ri g4J 5f 14, Phdu kep 1&

FprA Sflth lf4jIflL

NOTES:

/

i2797 ti-2fl thg urJkqrL fh1 -.] 4 I

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquwed eciabzed know1eige about (he NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the dre at rrw sioraWre.

I anree that I will not kno4agly divulge any fomiaon atiout these exartnaiiors to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or pmvkle porlormance (eadback to those app4cants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until complofion of exam1aticn administration, except as specfic1y noted belowand authorized by the NRC (eg.. acting as a simulator bcsth operator or communicator is acceptable If (he individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore. I am aware of the pbysical security measures and reiremers (as doctmiented n the faciAty liomseWs procedwes) and understand that violatiorio( the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the exanations aridlor enfereenient action against me or the facility licensee.

I will Immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications sugsstioris that examieaüon security may have been conipromised 2.

-ExaminatIon To the best of my knodge I dd nd dlvue to any iriauthorizecl persons any infoTmatkm nonceming (he NRC licensing exaniinabons administered during the weel(s) of%.

From the date Uiat I entered into this security agreement until the cenipletlon of examination odminisIraIion I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicant8 who were adirlinistered these Iioensing examinatrnns) except as specifically noted below and authouzed by the NRC.

i3f(?I1Cg A &L.l%4i.,

14.du 15.

NOTES:

i.6___

  • r/ii4 /4 ijt ki ES-201, Page 27 of 28 PRINTED NAME JOB ]TrLE I RESPONSIBILiTY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE 1

1

.lcr L&r1 JIlt *109 3.

s B 4

117 fQ

5. (JC 6-1 f

A

/,. &zz A T4 2

c

  • s-:y-c a

£ 4.Oi!lLi-pc cfrviiJt-kTar_

(*16 1 1/7/is 4f;qIa

8. ks S &nt4

?-Ici rç io 2

J) 1 i.SsU p

/cp

12. Fks-i-ci pjpt 5..

4-.-

4 i

-.-_r A

A iLA& A.MJi LLO jJJtr-

PFj1? P

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201 -3 1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of :qi.A.2QIOas of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of4 tØLi From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME 1.

2.

3.

iw.

4

r. 4-uc
4. SSave.r5 5.

6.

?-r45

7. jiUs
8. L3eiI Jop(.

1

9. L1Airii) i11 io.LrLr (1G
11. *sJ Mc4t 1

12.i,4c..A 13.NLs C

14.

1T14-(. L&

15.

NOTES:

JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY Acaac,i&

2i Sto C&#

O tJ4UMiv4 35

&1 so SIGNATURE (1)

A LkllA E ;::

DATE NOTE DATE SIGNATURE (2) 5/2V/o

7_27

//Ir 2 /i;;-w

-) 3 7//O 1ti

_t 7/10 b Pr-2A PeE2i3

____(

__________ /

cj r21)

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201.3 1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC (icensinU examinations scheduled for the week(s) of

-tG Q 1( of the date of my Slgflatu(e.

I agree that 1 will not krowiagty divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorired by the NRC chief ecaminer.

I understand thaI 1 am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examinallon administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized bythe NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator Is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedbk). Furthermore. I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facIity Uaerjsees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examInations andlor an enforcement aLlon against me or the facility licensee.

1 will lmridiately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Exa1nirtatin To the best of my know)ede I did not divulge to any unauthoied persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of0 h3 4i/ From the date that I entered into this secuntij agreement until the completion of examination administration, I dj not instwct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as speoiticaUy noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE! RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGN TURE (2)

DATE NOTE

- 4,o.zs 5)0 A i.,- j,&

2. rQ

,k 1

i i 4i/i 4 3 rsL 4, Qv fi4q 1

f/{/p

2LI, q2t/D
4. r S We.r5 S RO C&t.
8. veU jop(:.

P 7

12.

j%(c S,4f 0

ew,1 A7 10 ES-201, Page 27 of 28

-4 0

-cc I0 I

13..th4,$

C STJGb.C

14. TjioT!4( I. L.-iei 15.

fYi.

NOTES:

2j:

E) ij FW annoton yrmnn eneee hMt essae Lirsert OP

.FstTe sbePn e

Tahorna to j E 1

HhImpata cc 1

J torn-at Pan-ten B z uf t7

-dare (ect tnh ads Be alan-dc Spn-ata a Po.

tn-p e.

Opel n-c Lan C

S

C i!2t L..

O5S5 n-n-Itt Ths ste II be a

Sr osoft Enchane n-01115

° L1

1 Amount Subject F,

amnaten Osrurty tQersnr 53 From: Robert Cttljns [rnaIto:coltnsroberto7gmailcornJ, 1:54 PM 6 ii. ) /--<Z4 c2-.--

Subject:

Re: Eeaminatrot Security 4greement f 1J ft Helen My cell is not allowing me to dial out of the counts-v for tome reason Tell Ron. No one got any nfonnatiosi from me pertaining to the etam.

If he wants he can try to call me at: 0528014806 I miss von gmst On Thu. Sep 23. 2010 at 550 PM. Monis, Helen L himonis nva gay> wrote:

I pft _)1 Rob

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowede, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of /1

. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) 2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.10.14 DALTc*

11. LiilItks4& TloM5C 12.i.r 7 Ui 1.4(1$,i 14.

-Jc;L\\

15. &f4ø t23 NOTES:

DATE SIGNAT (2)

DATE NOTE 9 (

lStYL_).?

Ac. /

1 I

79?c op

-jy

(&...

(,

I 9I2.- j,lO l?TT fJS1A(Th J/),/

/$

g,,,

c/

/,2 9)2 0

%--T3c

--f>

C[JvTc) p1 U1 EZ 7ZiZ9-OP

/fri2wizCL ygL1 q///o A1,-kme I Yr*

Pi

,s, I4V(Z ifrk rj 1

3flj!

L ES-201, Page 27 of 28 K

4c:

-J

-r o

ig øii 7Z3k9

\\ JLch 1

tkc.

Icy 9 /3//)

PIAcrE 2

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES -201-3 1.

PreExaminatior I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of At4O2 CItl s at the date of my signature. I agree that I will not )cnowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

1 understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations (mm this date unlil completion of examInation administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g.. acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator Is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or Indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) end understand that viotation of the conditions ci this agreement may result In cancellation of the examinations and(or an en(orcment action against me or the facility licensee, twill immediately report to facility management or the NRC chiet examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examinatioii To the best of my knowledge I did not divulge to any unauthorized pemons any iniormation concerning the NRC licensing examinations adniinisterej during the week(s) of !/13-1 kt* From the date that I entered into this seowity agreement until the conip?elion of examination administration, I did not insixuct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

DATE NOTE PRINTED NAME JOB TiTLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SINT(2) i...a b rrr..

2. _1.PP jS 5L Irz1biJ clb. 4W
PJiJ,
3. jç d CJF

\\f,/i-

4. btrJ 1(AE cis I,vr&trw(

(:,

5.J1rr cIl,.Aoe)c

. I/ALLy i/

ti 0

3 ice Z

8.,y 9,

a-Zar 7.

3423//U

12. ry a i41kAd

!4ri f5

-f 74°-

  • 3iA

g

,1.

&C f.4,

15. /e i3 NOTES:

ES2O1, Page 27 of 28 Pc63I3 r%i CD CD E\\)

I V

V

%3 r%)

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201 -3 1.

Pre-Examination I:)!

Q/j I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 723 7icas of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination 1/; fr To the best of my knowIedgl id not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of-rom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

3.

ThIL pgi

4.,4 PL 5.

t4k.-t 6.

,q-1 r

7.

tJP<

8. MLj

10.

11.I_

12.

13.1AAJlE1.

14.-

15. Wili*v..

D-.vi&onc NOTES:

w, f4JE 93f2 7/23 ES-201, Page 27 of 28 PRINTED NAME 1.

R 5 tcu3tZ-

2. /li. A(tQZ.i JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY US/S1A SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE e/zsl.o 1-Z3-Ic d7

/1A)fZ SM P11/FPT cç&%

f/(

4Q 6P cipt USL&1p

,r jv7

,)2Iin

.A (-c-j iv%4, 7.j7o L7f*

0 nifrA pPi 0 S SkcDf

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES..201.3 1.

PreExamIha1fon 11 1/1 I acknowledge that I have aGquIred specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations s teduied for the week(s) of 723 7/oas of Iha date olnty signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any Information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to Instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authoiized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable it (ha indMdual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I wit Immediately report to leoJity management or the NRC chief examiner any Indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-ExaminatIon To the best of my knowiedg 1

l cjld not divutge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensirg examinations administered du(ing the weelc(s) of-From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the conipletiun of examination administration, I did not Instruct, evaluate, or pnwlde performance feedback ID those applicants who were administered these boerising examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC..

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSillLlTY ES-201. Page 27 of 28 SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE 13 151.

ucfs1

  • ., -7

f-z 7JL4

/

/to j1t 91i6o E

L 1.

2.

M.

3.

?iiL çp,iNkIT

4. _j4_ gZCq 2

.,-L

5. -

a-iN

.--o b

VreV ca 1I(O

11. c_i U

A (C3%..j

( /t p

12. c.\\Ly C_
13. MkfL w.

3.qeFk oP

-p 14.-ck ItDiJkVa41/\\

pM 4

15.t l( o-.

NOTES:

ofs 4

ja--

V V

[íA

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of /2.5 12)_ as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowpdgç,

I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of &/2.3 h.

3 M From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME 1.

ii

2. bMc
3.,qJbc-r 1
4. CI f%/k
5. iAi
6. X41A.f JJ(F.hah%
7. y (. Netsvuz--
8. L)t 7r;/,

11 12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

ptL3z L-At.4øt cpLp.

tGTt

(,/.S (-.wc1 ir 3utru..cLor JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) f(/

/%

4jz/s LV (/,9--

14.1/7! C1 (1 4

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE q/f/jo (IQQe.* / r) 9)

(4i JLr,,

c PA6-S

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination: August 2010 Examination Level: RO SRO Li Operating Test Number: NRC Exam 1 Administrative Topic Tvre r

Describe activity to be performed (See Note)

Code A.1-1 Determine Values for Raising RWST Level.

Conduct of Operations M, R 2.1.23 Ability to perform specific system and integrated plant procedures during all modes of plant operation. (41.10 /43.5/ 45.2 / 45.6) 4.3/4.4.

A.1-2 Determine RCP Start Requirements.

Conduct of Operations N, R 2.1.32 Ability to explain and apply system limits and precautions. (41.10/43.2/45.12) 2.7/3.5.

A.2 Review 1-Sl-O-4, Monthly Surveillances.

Equipment Control M, R 2.2.12 Knowledge of surveillance procedures. (41.10 /

45.13) 3.7/4.1.

A.3 Determine if Stay Times Exceed Emergency Exposure Limits.

Radiation Control M, R 2.3.4 Knowledge of radiation exposure limits under normal or emergency conditions. (41.12 / 43.4 / 45.10) 3.2/3.7.

Emergency Procedures /

Not Required.

Plan NOTE:

All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

  • Type Codes & Criteria:

(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (< 3 for ROs; <4 for SROs & RO retakes)

(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (> 1)

(P)revious 2 exams (< 1; randomly selected)

ES 301, Page 22 of 27

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 RO Admin JPM Summary Al-i The applicant performs the calculations necessary to determine the amount of primary water, and the amount of boric acid solution required to raise RWST volume by 3000 gallons while maintaining a 3100 ppm concentration in the RWST.

A.1-2 The applicant determines from the data provided, that RCP #2 should be started first, and the earliest time to start the pump is 1742.

A.2 The applicant reviews a partial performance of i-Sl-0-4, Monthly Surveillances, identifies five errors and determines the actions required to be taken for each of the errors.

A 3 The applicant calculates the total dose received performing the assigned tasks to be 23.3 Rem, and then determines that personnel receiving emergency or accident exposures should be restricted from further occupational exposure pending the outcome of exposure evaluations and, if necessary, medical surveillance A.4 Not Required.

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination: August 2010 Examination Level: RO LI SRO Operating Test Number: NRC Exam 1 Administrative Topic Tvne Describe activity to be performed (See Note)

,Oue A.1-1 Determine Values for Raising RWST Level.

Conduct of Operations M, R 2.1.23 Ability to perform specific system and integrated plant procedures during all modes of plant operation. (41.10/

43.5 / 45.2 / 45.6) 4.3/4.4.

A.1-2 Determine RCP Start Requirements.

Conduct of Operations N, R 2.1.32 Ability to explain and apply system limits and precautions.

(41.10/43.2/45.12) 2.7/3.5.

A.2 Determine a Technical Specification Completion Time Extension.

Equipment Control N, R 2.2.42 Ability to track Technical Specification limiting conditions for operations. (41.10 /43.2 /45.13) 3.1/4.6 A.3 Determine if Stay Times Exceed Emergency Exposure Limits.

Radiation Control M, R 2.3.4 Knowledge of radiation exposure limits under normal or emergency conditions. (41.12 / 43.4 / 45.10) 3.2/3.7.

A.4 Determine if conditions warrant a Follow-up Report or Upgrade based on changing conditions.

Emergency Procedures / Plan M, R 2.4.40 Knowledge of SRO responsibilities in emergency plan implementation. (CFR: 41.10/43.5/45.11) 2.5/3.3.

NOTE:

All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

  • Type Codes & Criteria:

(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (< 3 for ROs; <4 for SROs & RO retakes)

(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (> 1)

(P)revious 2 exams (< 1; randomly selected)

ES 301, Page 22 of 27

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 SRO Admin JPM Summary Al-i The applicant will perform the calculations necessary to determine the amount of primary water, and the amount of boric acid solution required to raise RWST volume by 3000 gallons while maintaining a 3100 ppm concentration in the RWST.

A.1-2 The applicant determines from the data provided, that RCP #2 should be started first, and the earliest time to start the pump is 1742.

A.2 The applicant evaluates the information presented and determines the LATEST date and time that Unit must be placed in Mode 4 based on the information presented.

A.3 The applicant calculates the total dose received performing the assigned tasks to be 23.3 Rem, and then determines that personnel receiving emergency or accident exposures should be restricted from further occupational exposure pending the outcome of exposure evaluations and, if necessary, medical surveillance A.4 The applicant evaluates changes to plant conditions, determines that an upgrade from a Site Area Emergency to a General Emergency is required, prepares forms for emergency notification, and initiates Protective Action Recommendations.

-ES-301 Control Roomlln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination: August 2010 Exam Level: RO SRO-l SRO-U Operating Test Number: NRC Exam 1 BoIded JPMs are SRO-U.)

(Italicized JPM is RO only.)

Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-l); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)

System / JPM Title Type Cocie*

Safety Function a.

Perform a Minor Dilution.

A, M 004 A Chemical and Volume Control System (4.07, 3.9/3.7).

b.

Fill Cold Leg Accumulator #4.

M, L 2

006 Emergency Core Cooling System (A4.07, 4.4/4.4).

c.

Perform ES-I.3 Transfer to Containment Sump.

EN, M 3

011 Large Break LOCA (EA1.11, 4.2/4.2).

d.

Respond to IA RHR pump trip per AOI-14.

D, L 4P 025 Loss of Re.sidual Heat Removal System (AAI.09, 3.2/3.1) e.

Respond to a PRT High Pressure alarm.

A, M 5

007 Pressurizer Relief Tank/Quench Tank (A4.10, 3.6/3.8) f.

Shutdown of DG from Main Control Room.

C or S, A, EN, 6

064 Emergency Diesel Generators (A4.01, 4.0/4.3).

M g.

Return Failed RCS Temperature Channel to Service.

A, N 7

016 Non-Nuclear instrumentation System_(A4.01,_2.9/2.8).

h.

Shutdown instrument Room Purge.

C or S, N 8

029 Containment Purge System (A2.03, 2.7/3.2).

In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U) i.

Bypassing 1-PCV-62-81, CVCS LETDOWN HX PRESS CNTL, for local control.

0, R 2

004 Chemical and Volume Control System_(A1.11,_3.0/3.0).

j.

Transfer 250v DC Turbine Building Distribution Board 1 from Normal to Alternate.

D 6

063 DC Electrical Distribution System_(K4.02._2.9/3.2).

k.

Local Restart of C&SS Air Compressors.

A, D, E 8

065 Loss of Instrument Air (AK3.08, 3.7/3.8).

All RO and SRO-l control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

  • Type Codes Criteria for RO I SRO-l / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6 /

4-6

/ 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irectfrom bank

<9 I

<8

/ <4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1

I 1

/

1 (EN)gineeredsafetyfeature

/

I 1 (L)ow-Power I Shutdown

> 1 I

> I

/

> 1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A)

> 2 /

> 2

/

> 1 (P)revious 2 exams

< 3

< 3 / < 2 (randomly selected)

(R)CA

>1 I

>1 I >1 (S)imulator ES-30I, Page 23 of 27

ES-301 Control Roomlln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Control Room/In-Plant System JPM Summary B.I.a Applicant aligns the CVCS system to accomplish a minor dilution using SOl-62.02, Boron Concentration Control, Section 6.6, Minor Dilution. When the dilution is initiated, I-FCV-62-128, MAKEUP TO VCT INLET, and I-FCV-62-143, PW TO BLENDER, fail open. The operator enters AOl 3,Malfunction of Reactor Makeup Control, and terminates the dilution by stopping the primary water pumps.

B.1.b Applicant adds water to the cold leg accumulator with reactor coolant system pressure at approximately 1520 psig. The lower RCS pressure requires a different alignment to be established during the filling process.

B.I.c Applicant aligns the ECCS systems to the Containment Sump. The applicant identifies the failure of I-FCV-63-3, SI PMPS RECIRC HDR TO RWST to close and the failure of I-FCV-63-II, RHR PMP B TO SI PMPS SUCT to open, and takes required compensatory actions.

B.1.d THIS JPM IS DESIGNA TED AS THE RO ONLY JPM.

The applicant responds to the trip of IA-A RHR pump in accordance with AOI-14, Loss of RHR Shutdown Cooling, Section 3.5, RHR Pump IA-A Trip and places the lB-B RHR pump in service.

B.1.e The applicant uses ARI 88-C actions to reduce PRT pressure to 6.5 psig and then diagnoses the failure of PZR PORV 1-68-334 open, and terminates the depressurization by placing 1-HS-68-332A BLOCK VALVE FOR PORV 334 in the CLOSED position.

B.I.f This JPM may be performed either in the Main Control Room or on the Simulator.

During a normal shutdown of the I B-B Diesel Generator from the Control Room, the applicant determines that an emergency stop of the diesel generator is required upon receipt of annunciator 203-D, CRANKCASE PRESS HI and performs an emergency stop of the lB-B Diesel Generator.

B.1.g The applicant returns Loop 2 RCS Tavg and zT inputs to the rod control system, using AOI-2, Malfunction of Reactor Control System. When rods are returned to automatic, a continuous rod bank withdrawal occurs. The applicant initiates a manual reactor trip upon diagnosis of the continuous rod bank withdrawal.

B.1.h This JPM may be performed either in the Main Control Room or on the Simulator.

The applicant shuts down the instrument room purge using SOl-30.02, Containment Purge System, Section 7.6, SHUTDOWN of Instrument Room Purge.

B.I.i The applicant performs the manual actions required to bypass PCV-62-81, LETDOWN PRESS CONTROL in accordance with SO1-62.O1 Section 8.15.

B.1.j The applicant completes the transfer of 250V DC Turbine Building Distribution Board #1 from its Normal to Alternate supply per SOI-239.01, 250V Battery Board 1, Section 8.7.1, Transfer from Normal to Alternate.

B.1.k After a station blackout, the applicant aligns and restarts the A and B Air Compressors using Aol-I 0, Loss of Control Air. Recovery of the A Control and Station Air Compressor requires the reset of the high air temperature alarm, and hand loading of the compressor after restart.

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility:

Watts Bar Date of Examination:

08/2010 Operating Test Number:

1 Initials

1. General Criteria a

b*

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

c.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.)

A2 d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within g,g acceptable limits.

f S

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent gj) applicants at the designated license level, f

2. walk-Through Criteria

a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

jk_.

.r

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

system response and other examiner cues

statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

criteria for successful completion of the task

identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance f

criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified I

3 on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with 9O.

Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed e / Signa)jire /

Date a.

Author John B Roden /

A 4 /

i c b.

Facility Reviewer(*)

Steven R. Smith /

112/,1.D c.

NRC Chief Examiner (#) Q 1

6 (ti. Li4 /

e/ia./io d.

NRC Supervisor NOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facilty: Watts Bar Date of Exam: 08/10 Scenario Numbers:

1 /2/3/4/5/ SPARE Operating Test No.

I QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES InWals

a b*

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

1 3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew WI the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) 4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

Py 6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

9j

Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

t_

Target Quantitative A+/-tributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes

1..

Total malfunctions (58) 81818171617 2.

MalfunctionsafterEOPentry(12) 21211121112 3.

Abnormal events (24) 414l41414I4 4.

Major transients (12) 21212 I 1 I I I I 5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 1 I 21 1 Il Il 12 6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (02) 01 1 11 10 I 1 I I 7.

Critical tasks (23) 21412141312

2,3,4 L2 ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam:

August 2010 Operating Test No.: Crew I A

E Scenarios Scenario 1 Scenario 2 T

M P

E o

I L

N T

N I

T CREW CREW CREW CREW A

I C

POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION L

M A

T S

A B

S A

B S

A B

S A

B U

N R

T 0

R T

0 R

T 0

R T

0 M(*)

T P

0 C

P 0

C P

0 C

P 0

C P

RIU RO RX SRO-I-1 NOR 1

1 I/C Z34,5 4.5 SRO-U MAJ 6

6 1

TS 2,3 RO-1 RX 1

1 NOR 1

11 SRO-l I

f I/C 2,5 2,3 4

4 SRO-U MAJ 6

L2 21 TS

0022 RO-2 RX 1

1 1

1 0

NOR 1

1 111 SRO-I

I

I/C 34 45 4

442

SRO-U MAJ 6

6 2

2 2

1

TS 0

022 RO RX 110 NOR 111 SRO-I I/C 442 SRO-U MAJ 2

21 TS 022 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 TS Instructions:

34 Scenarios 2,3 1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301 -5 FaciIity: Watts Bar Date of Exam:

August 2010 Operating Test No.: Crew 3 r

A E

P V

P E

L N

I T

C A

T N

Y T

P E

Scenarios Scenario 1 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 CREW CREW CREW CREW POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION S

A B

S A

B S

A B

S R

T 0

R T

0 R

T 0

R 0

C P

0 C

P 0

C P

0 RO RX SRO-I-3 NOR IIC SRO-U MAJ 6

TS 2,3 A

RO RX NOR SRO-I-4 I/C SRO-U MAJ TS RO-4 RX NOR SRO-I I/C SRO-U MAJ T

M 0

I T

N A

I L

M B

U 0

M(*)

P RI U

1 110 2

111 10 4

4 2

3 221 4

022 1

110 1

1 11 8

442 2

221 2

022 1

110 2

111 6

4 42 3

221 0

022 1

10 TS I

I I

RO IRX SRO-l SRO-U IMAJ TS NOR 111 I/C 442 221 LITli iii Ii 0

212 -I Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam:

August 2010 Operating Test No.: Crew A

E P

V Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 5 T

M P

E 0

I L

N T

N I

T CREW CREW CREW CREW A

I C

POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION L

M A

T S

A B

S A

B S

A B

S A

B U

N R

T 0

R T

0 R

T 0

R T

0 M(*)

ROT RX 0

C P

0 C

P 0

C P

0 C

P RIU SRO-I-5 NOR i

I I

1 1

I/C 2,3,4,5 5

7 4

4 2

SRO-U MAJ 6

2 221 TS 2,3,4 0

2 2

RO RX 1

110 NOR 1111 SRO-I-6 I

I/C 8

4 4

2 SRO-U MAJ 6

7 2

2 2

1 TS 2,4 2

022 RO RX 1

110 NOR 1

1 iii SRO-I-7 I/C 3

2345 7

442 SRO-U MAJ 6

2221 TS 245 3

022 RO RX 110 NOR 111 SRO-I I/C 442 SRO-U MAJ 2

2 1

TS 022 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC)

and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

Scenario 2 A

P P

L C

A N

T ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam:

August 2010 Operating Test No.: Crew 5 E

Scenarios

- for Spare V

E N

T Scenario 4 Scenario 5 T

Y P

E S

R 0

CREW CREW CREW CREW POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A

T C

B 0

P S

R 0

RX A

T C

T 0

T A

L RD SRO-l-8 SRO-U NOR B

S A

B S

A B

0 R

T 0

R T

0 P

0 C

P 0

C P

M N

M U

M I/C MAJ TS R

RX U

NOR 1>

1 4

2 I/C MAJ RD SRO-l-9 SRO-U RD SRO-i-1O SRO-U TS RX NOR I/C MAJ TS I

I 7

2 3

I I

7 2

2 I

I 7

3 1

1 4

2 2

1 4

2 2

1 4

2 2

0 2

2 2

RX RD SRO-l SRO-U TS 2

NOR 1

1 I/C 4

42 MAJ 2

21 1

10 0

22 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RD applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam:

August 2010 Operating Test No.: SPARE A

E Scenarios P

V SPARE T

M P

E o

I L

N T

N I

T CREW CREW CREW CREW A

I C

POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION L

M A

T S

A B

S A

B S

A B

S A

B U

N Y

R T

0 R

T 0

R T

0 R

T 0

Mj ROT RX P

0110 SROI NOR 1

1111 I/C 2345 44 42 SROU MAJ 6

12 21 TS 2

022 RO RX i

1110 NOR 0111 SRO-I I/C 2

442 SRO-U MAJ 6

1 221 TS 0

022 RO RX 0110 NOR 1

1 111 SRO-I I/C 2,3 2

442 SRO-U MAJ 6

1 2

2 1

TS 0

022 RO RX 110 NOR 111 SRO-l I/C 442 SRO-U MAJ 2

2 1

TS 022 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-i event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D.

(*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-i basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301 -6 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination: August 2010 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO X

RD RD RD SRO-l SRO-l X

SRD-l SRD-l D

SRD-U SRD-U SRD-U X

SRO-U D Competencies NAD CNAIO_ CEAlQ 1

234 1

2341234 I

+

+iri 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 2,3, 2,3,4, 2,3, 2,3,4, 2,3, 2,3, inLerpreLl iagnose 5,6 5

5,6, 5,6 5,6 5

4,5, 5,6 4,5, 5

4,5, 4,5, Events and Conditions 6,

6 6,

6 C

I AI+k

,4 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, All All All 2,3,4, All All All 2,3,

..ornpy an 5,6 5

5,6, 5,6 5,6 4,5, Use Procedures (1) 6 c

+

r

+

1,2, 1.2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2,3, 1,2.

1,2,3, 1,2, 1,2,3, peraie..onLro 3,4, 4,5 456 4,5,6 3,4, 4,5 3,4, 4,5,6 Boards (2) 5,6 5,6 5,6,

Communicate All All All All All All All All All All All All and Interact Demonstrate All All All All All All All All Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and 23 234 2 4 23 2 3 234 2 4 23 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1)

Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RD.

(2)

Optional for an SRO-U.

(3)

Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination: August 2010 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO X

RO RO RO SRO-I SRO-I X

SRO-l SRO-l El SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U X

SRO-U El Competencies AjO CAIO_ CAlO_

56 56 56 Interpret/Diagnose 2354 2

234 2::

2354 23l Events and Conditions Comply With and 2,:4, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 2,3,4, 2,3:4, 24, Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control

13, Boards (2)

Communicate All All All All All All and Interact Demonstrate All All All All Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and 245 35 245 35 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1)

Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2)

Optional for an SRO-U.

(3)

Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant

Watts Bar 2010-301 August 2010 RO Exam NRC Exam I

ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier I Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected K/A 1/2 076 AA2.03 Plant does not have an RCS radioactivity level meter for monitoring Reactor Coolant Activity. Chemistry sampling is the method used for monitoring.

K/A Replaced by the Chief Examiner on 05/04/10 with KIA#076AA2.02.

2/1 073 K4.02 Plant does not have a Design feature or interlock for the isolation of letdown on high-RCS activity.

K/A Replaced by the Chief Examiner on 05/04/10 with KIA# 073 K4.01.

Watts Bar 2010-301 August 2010 SRO I

Exam NRC Exam ES-401 2/1 Record of Rejected KIAs Form ES-401-4 Tier /

Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected K/A 003A2.03 Unable to write an SRO only question.

K/A replaced by the Chief Examiner on 08/06/10 with K/A#003A2.O1.

2010-09-16 15:39 NRC 22 4049974950 P lu E8401 Wdtton Examination Quaiftv Checklist Form E$4O1$

Fsclfty Waft rrTr]rIrI rrrhm rr (iffil p

1.

wt cm aUtactumIo #04 p6caNewttsJØ

.. $ b 2

2.

NRC K/M ms w(tnced focal que&na.

!.kfl 3

t e?a!&flD14ofE$-44t 4

The nmpRng pwmn mrndom cad rntam&zØI mote 4 RD aZ SF10 qutnbai

//

Xfl tensuft the NRROtpqnicf&4 ndoptketh** Uon thekn tctee*tiiØW4 enm wn conlroffad p b4cated bdow(c*ezR th* Item that epØle4sm$ appeem sppnptIate theaodt narn wnsybna$csfly and asmdomty <fevdøped; ci enm %Sfl.c nØfld jfry theftef the er4mInatkms wete dc pedthdepenthu4 a t:the floenseetMffite thM thete (s no dupfloahpa; er 8

Bsmk tu meatsikul1 (ho fl4fl then 76 p&cent (sik Raw horn the bentat bass lftpuwent now,

,wccmoEentetheeatuaSRO18R0cdy 211 42 47 (20 321 S 7.

Setwoen5oendtOpetcntotthequesthnscothsflO MNUQW CIA exam ernwttRo 4ft$s1s t*Vb&

4 --

flie.SRDenrnmayczceedøOpcrnonlfftheran4ocntj 4f4 sdeczad KMes odibehflieccognlUvelavat enter the 8.

Rrra&bandovts ptoade4do ne give cey wtswoea f42 jC osaRih 9.

0oofome vm pec4fIcKIA statuncnts 10 the usIy.appcoved A.

nutnatlon ottlIne and is appscflía the tkrtc wiWi they cm aWgned

<1

10.

. 0uosUon et$cquciJty and toerrnd rneettuaguidetews EL 4-I.

The exam conl$ifl ccqtked number a omipc4et mutfl duciw 1terne thelotal tncouect eM eththeutgttsonthecovesta Pdnted Na ei$Igtuc ore Pate Autha AohetRe4iail e; Fed4Rev1ei 1

trfl

Note: t The ldity rovlewofl htlth1a/gnatureme not app&abtefvr NRC examinatiom.

r in in $ ø.

r---

/h TheM AL The aieo so pnob) 0f +a wMS RAie 2010-3° wnta &aQt

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6

a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Regional Supervisor C,, ate,??ide /,J 1L C

1 J/

W Facility:

Watts Bar Date of Exam:

08/2010 Exam Level: RO IXI SROl Initial Item Description a

b*

c#

1.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

f t

2.

a.

NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.

/Aat. 5

ç b.

Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

3.

SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 i2_ :

4.

The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office).

5.

Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or ff4 the examinations were developed independently; or X

the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain) 6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest 3

new or modified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only 21 / 12 47 / 20 32 / 68 r

question_distribution(s)_at_right.

7.

Between 50 and so percent of the questions on the RO Memory C/A exam are written at the comprehension! analysis level; A

the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 43 / 40 57 / 60

selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO question distribution(s) at right.

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9.

Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.

11.

The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; f,

1

,i the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

/

Note:

  • The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:

Watts Bar 2010-301 Date of Exam: 09/22/2010 Exam Level: ROISRO Initials Item Description b

c 1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading 4) 2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3.

Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed_by_half or more of the_applicants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

Edkn, Le fr p

d. NRC Supeisor (*)

(*)

The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Watts Barr Date of Exam: 9/22/2010 Exam Level: ROISRO Initials Item Description a

b c

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented A

3.

Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers_spot_check>_25%_of examinations) 4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as_applicable,_+/-4%_on_the_SRO-only)_reviewed_in_detail 5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are_justified 6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*)

The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML110140212&oldid=5285746"