ML103490555
| ML103490555 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 12/15/2010 |
| From: | Martin R Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Thompson B, Weathersby J South Carolina Electric & Gas Co |
| Martin R, NRR/DLPM, 415-1493 | |
| References | |
| TAC ME5011 | |
| Download: ML103490555 (1) | |
Text
From:
Martin, Robert Sent:
Wednesday, December 15, 2010 12:10 PM To:
THOMPSON, BRUCE L; WEATHERSBY, JASON H Cc:
Mathew, Roy; Matharu, Gurcharan; Lingam, Siva; Boyle, Patrick
Subject:
Acceptance Review for License Amendment Application on EDG Surveillance, TAC ME5011 By letter dated November 11, 2010Property "Letter" (as page type) with input value "RC-10-0092, License Amendment Request (LAR 10-02033), Changes to Emergency Diesel Generator Surveillance Test Requirements" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process., (ML103190756), the South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) submitted a request to revise the Technical Specifications (TS), in Appendix A to Facility Operating License Number NPF-12 for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1, (VCSNS). The changes would modify the TS by providing surveillance enhancements that will improve operation and testing of the emergency diesel generators (EDG) and to provide a more restrictive voltage and frequency band for operation when not connected in parallel with the offsite sources. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this application. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to conduct a detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of SCE&Gs request in terms of regulatory requirements.
If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Bob Martin LPL2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No(s): 50-395