ML102530177
| ML102530177 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 09/15/2010 |
| From: | Lyon C Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | Reddeman M Energy Northwest |
| Lyon C Fred, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 301-415-2296 | |
| References | |
| TAC ME3981 | |
| Download: ML102530177 (4) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 15, 2010 Mr. Mark E. Reddeman Chief Executive Officer Energy Northwest P.O. Box 968 (Mail Drop 1023)
Richland, WA 99352-0968 SUB~IECT:
COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION - REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE (TAC NO. ME3981)
Dear Mr. Reddeman:
By letter dated July 30, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML102360357), Energy Northwest (EN), submitted affidavits executed by James F. Harrison, GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC (GEH), dated July 28, 2010, and Edward D. Schrull, GEH, dated July 19, 2010, requesting that the information contained in the following documents be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390: of GEH letter, GE-MS-CT-106244-KM118, Kahlim Miller (GEH) to James Snyder (Energy Northwest), "GEH Review of Proprietary Information in Columbia Generating Station Responses to Request for Supplemental Information #2,3,4, 5,6, and 7," dated July 28,2010. of GEH letter, GE-MS-CT-106244-KM115, Kahlim Miller (GEH) to James Snyder (Energy Northwest), "Responses to Request for Supplemental Information #1, 3, and 8," dated July 19, 2010. of GEH letter, GEH-CGS-107474-113, Kevin M. Whildin (GEH) to James Snyder (Energy Northwest), "Response to Request for Supplemental Information #8," dated July 28, 2010.
The information is included in Attachments 1, 2, and 3 to EN's letter dated July 30, 2010. A nonproprietary version of these documents, designated as Attachments 5, 6, and 7 to EN's letter dated July 30,2010, has been placed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's)
Public Document Room and added to the ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room.
The affidavits stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:
The information...is classified as proprietary because it contains details developed by GEH from I\\IEDC-32410P-A, "Nuclear Measurement Analysis and Control Power Range Neutron (NUMAC PRNM) Retrofit Plus Option III Stability Trip Function," dated October 1995. Development of the NUMAC PRNM, and information related to the design, modification,
M. Reddeman
- 2 analyses methodologies and processes related to the NUMAC PRNM was achieved at a significant cost to GEH. The development of the evaluation process, along with the interpretation and application of the analytical results, is derived from the extensive experience database that constitutes a major GEH asset.
Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to GEH's competitive position and foreclose or reduce the availability of profit-making opportunities. The information is part of GEH's comprehensive BWR safety and technology base, and its commercial value extends beyond the original development cost. The value of the technology base goes beyond the extensive physical database and analytical methodology and includes development of the expertise to determine and apply the appropriate evaluation process. In addition, the technology base includes the value derived from providing analyses done with NRC-approved methods.
The research, development, engineering, analytical and NRC review costs comprise a substantial investment of time and money by GEH. The precise value of the expertise to devise an evaluation process and apply the correct analytical methodology is difficult to quantify, but it clearly is substantial. GEH's competitive advantage will be lost if its competitors are able to use the results of the GEH experience to normalize or verify their own process or if they are able to claim an equivalent understanding by demonstrating that they can arrive at the same or similar conclusions.
The value of this information to GEH would be lost if the information were disclosed to the public. Making such information available to competitors without their having been required to undertake a similar expenditure of resources would unfairly provide competitors with a windfall, and deprive GEH of the opportunity to exercise its competitive advantage to seek an adequate return on its large investment in developing and obtaining these very valuable analytical tools.
We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure.
Therefore, the version(s) of the submitted information marked as proprietary will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.
M. Reddeman
- 3 If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at (301) 415-2296 or via e-mail at fred.lyon@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, CF~
Carl F. Lyon, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-397 cc: Distribution via Listserv
- 3 M. Reddeman If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at (301) 415-2296 or via e-mail at fred.lyon@nrc.gov.
Sincerely,
/RA!
Carl F. Lyon, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-397 cc: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC LPLIV Reading RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDeEicb Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl4 Resource RidsNrrPMColumbia Resource RidsNrrLAJBurkhardt Resource RidsOgcRp Resource RidsRgn4MailCenter Resource ADAMS Accession No ML102530177 OFFICE NRR/LPL4/PM NRR/LPL4/LA NRR/LPL4/BC NRR/LPL4/PM NAME FLyon JBurkhardt MMarkley FLyon DATE 9/15/10 9/14/10 9/15/10 9/15/10 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy