ML102140098

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Edwin Hatch and Joseph Farley Nuclear Plants, Units 1 & 2, and Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Units 1 & 2 - Email, Attachment Regarding Acceptance for Rev Iew of Cyber Security Plan
ML102140098
Person / Time
Site: Hatch, Vogtle, Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 08/02/2010
From: Martin R
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Ajluni M
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
martin, r e, NRR/DORL, 301-415-1493
References
TAC ME4356, TAC ME4357, TAC ME4358, TAC ME4359, TAC ME4360, TAC ME4361
Download: ML102140098 (1)


Text

From:

Martin, Robert Sent:

Monday, August 02, 2010 9:32 AM To:

mjajluni@southernco.com; Stringfellow, N. Jack

Subject:

Acceptance for Review of Cyber Security Plan By letter dated July 16, 2010, the Southern Nuclear Operating Company submitted a license amendment request and associated Cyber Security Plan for the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 and the Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plants.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to continue its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()

Subject:

Acceptance for Review of Cyber Security Plan Sent Date: 8/2/2010 9:14:52 AM Received Date: 8/2/2010 9:32:00 AM From: Martin, Robert Created By: Robert.Martin@nrc.gov Recipients:

mjajluni@southernco.com (mjajluni@southernco.com)

Tracking Status: None NJSTRING@southernco.com (Stringfellow, N. Jack)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 8911 8/2/2010

Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: