ML100700405

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acceptance Review, Relief Request - Forth 10 Year Inservice Inspection Plan
ML100700405
Person / Time
Site: North Anna Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 03/10/2010
From: V Sreenivas
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Heacock D
Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
Sreenivas V.NRR/DORL/LPL2-1 415-2597
References
TAC ME3292, TAC ME3311, TAC ME3312, TAC ME3313, TAC ME3314, TAC ME3315, TAC ME3316, TAC ME3317
Download: ML100700405 (1)


Text

From:

Sreenivas, V To:

david.heacock@dom.com Cc:

david.summer@dom.com; tom.shaub@dom.com; Kulesa, Gloria; Thorpe, April; Cotton, Karen

Subject:

NORTH ANNA, UNITS 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, RELIEF REQUESTS-FORTH 10 YEAR INSERVICE INSPECTION PLAN (TAC NO. ME3311, ME3312, ME3313, ME3314, ME3315, ME3316, ME3317, ME3292)ADAMS ML100330125 Date:

Wednesday, March 10, 2010 3:33:53 PM By letter dated February 1, 2010, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted fourth ten year inservice inspection plan requesting relief from certain requirements of ASME Code for North Anna Power Station, Units 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M.,

Project Manager, LPL2-1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation