ML100620087

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Retake Exam 2009, As-Submitted Administrative JPMs
ML100620087
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 08/06/2009
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Dominion Energy Kewaunee
References
SO-036-JP031
Download: ML100620087 (52)


Text

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)

SITE: Kewaunee Power Station JPM TITLE: Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check JPM NUMBER: SO-036-JP031 REV. A RELATED PRA None INFORMATION:

TASK NUMBER(S) / 0360030201 / Perform a Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check TASK TITLE(S):

2.1.7 - Ability to evaluate plant performance and operational judgements based K/A NUMBERS:

on operating characteristics, reactor behavior, and instrument interpetation APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:

Discussion: Simulate/walkthrough: Perform: X EVALUATION LOCATION: In-Plant: Control Room:

Simulator: X Other:

Classroom Lab:

Time for Completion: 20 Minutes Time Critical: NO Alternate Path / Faulted: Yes TASK APPLICABILITY: SRO Additional signatures may be added as needed.

Developed by: Andrew Fahrenkrug /s 06/29/09 Instructor Date Validated by: Stephen Johnson /s 06/30/09 Validation Instructor Date (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)

Approved by: Ethan Treptow /s 07/01/09 Facility Representative Date Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 1 of 14 Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File

SO-36-JP031, Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check, Rev A JPM Number: SO-36-JP031 Perform a Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check JPM

Title:

Examinee: Evaluator:

Job

Title:

Date:

Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS: SAT: UNSAT:

COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).

EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:

NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 2 of 14

SO-36-JP031, Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check, Rev A JPM BRIEFING/TURNOVER Read to Examinee:

DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.

You may use any approved reference materials normally available including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, and log entries as if the evolution is actually being performed.

AOP and EOP Immediate Actions are required to be performed from memory. After completing immediate action steps without using the procedure, you may then use any approved reference materials.

If this JPM is performed on the simulator, the JPM administrator should only give cues that are not indicated on the simulator. If simulator indication is sufficient to indicate the completion of a step, the JPM administrator should not have to give a cue to the trainee to continue the evolution.

1. Human Performance attributes should be visible. The student may use STAR and or request Peer Checks.
2. If peer checks are requested, the Instructor should reply - Peer Check Acknowledged. The instructor will acknowledge use of the human performance tool and not validate the proper component manipulation.

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues.

When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 3 of 14

SO-36-JP031, Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check, Rev A INITIAL CONDITIONS:

  • The plant has been in a Steady State Condition at 100% for 20 days.
  • The operators have performed a Manual Calculation of the RCS Mass Balance Leak Rate Check per OP-KW-OSP-RCS-001, Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check per section 5.4.2 due PPCS calculation of RCS Mass Balance Leak Rate program is non-functional.
  • Calculated Leak Rate prior to performance of a Manual Calculation of the RCS Mass Balance Leak Rate Check per OP-KW-OSP-RCS-001 was 0.119 gpm.

THE STEPS IN THIS JPM SHOULD BE: PERFORMED THIS TASK IS NOT TIME CRITICAL INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

VERIFY Attachment B of OP-KW-OSP-RCS-001 AND IDENTIFY ALL actions that are required to be implemented.

Provide performer with marked up copy of OSP-RCS-001, and Attachment 1 when covering initial conditions INFORM THE EVALUATOR WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED THE TASK Do you have any questions before we begin? - Answer applicable questions Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 4 of 14

SO-36-JP031, Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check, Rev A JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION NOTE: Review GNP-05.16.06, ATTACHMENT A for Time Dependent Operator Actions. If the JPM addresses one of these tasks and the JPM is determined to be time critical or contain time critical performance steps, then GNP-05.16.06 will be included in the General References below.

[OTH 12765]

NOTE: If this JPM is performed in the Simulator Control Room do not provide the student with any materials other than the turn over sheet.

Required Materials: Marked up copy of OP-KW-OSP-RCS-001 Rev 002, Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check.

Attachment 1. Faulted Attachment B for Review Attachment 2. Corrected Attachment B.

Technical Specifications Calculator General

References:

OP-KW-OSP-RCS-001 Rev 002, Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check.

KPS Technical Specifications Task Standards: 1. Find Math Errors on Attachment B for Column 5 VCT Level and PRZR Level

2. Determine that investigation and evaluation of leak is required to be started within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.
3. Determine Exceed T.S Limit of RCS unidentified leakage and action statement T.S. 3.1.d.2 applies Start Time:

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 5 of 14

SO-36-JP031, Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check, Rev A NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee. Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).

NOTE: Critical steps are marked with a Yes below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.

Performance Step: 1 Review Attachment B of OP-KW-OSP-RCS-001 Critical: Yes Standard: (c) Identify that calculation is inaccurate because of wrong calculations in column 5 for D (VCT Level Difference) & F (PRZR Level Difference), both missing minus sign.

Evaluator Cue: GIVE the performer Attachment 1 faulted Attachment B.

Evaluator Cue: WHEN the performer identifies the error, Acknowledge the error IF the performer requests to be re-performed then use TIME COMPRESSION and provide the performer with Attachment 2 the corrected Attachment B Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Performance Step: 2 Identify that RCS leakage is greater than .2 gpm and greater than 1.0 gpm.

Critical: Yes Standard: (c) Identify that RCS leakage exceeds .2 gpm and greater than 1.0 gpm..

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 6 of 14

SO-36-JP031, Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check, Rev A Performance Step: 3 Refer to OP-KW-OSP-RCS-001 to determine required actions Critical: No Standard: Refer to OP-KW-OSP-RCS-001 Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Performance Step: 4 Determine Actions for RCS leakage greater than .2 gpm and greater than 1.0 Critical: Yes gpm.

Standard: Determine the following actions per OP-KW-OSP-RCS-001 (c) 1. Start an investigation and evaluation within four hours of the indication

2. Document the investigation using Attachment H
3. Initiate a CR Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Performance Step: 5 Determine RCS leakage exceeds T.S. limit of 3.1.d Critical: Yes Standard: (c) Determine that exceed T.S. 3.1.d.1.B and have to apply T.S. 3.1.d.2.

Have four hours to reduce leakage within the limits of T.S. 3.1.d.1.B or apply T.S. 3.1.d.3 Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 7 of 14

SO-36-JP031, Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check, Rev A Terminating Cues: When the performer has identified all actions required for RCS unidentified leakage > .2 gpm and >1.0gpm, This JPM is complete.

Stop Time: ________

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 8 of 14

SO-36-JP031, Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check, Rev A During the evaluation, the trainee: Evaluation

  • Performed the task correctly and in accordance with procedure PASS FAIL usage and adherence requirements.
  • Never put anyones safety at risk. PASS FAIL
  • Never put equipment reliability at risk. PASS FAIL
  • Never violated radiological work practices. PASS FAIL
  • Demonstrated effective use of event-free human performance PASS FAIL tools.

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 9 of 14

SO-36-JP031, Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check, Rev A SIMULATOR SET UP:

  • None Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 10 of 14

SO-36-JP031, Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check, Rev A Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 11 of 14

TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:

  • The plant has been in a Steady State Condition at 100% for 20 days.
  • The operators have performed a Manual Calculation of the RCS Mass Balance Leak Rate Check per OP-KW-OSP-RCS-001, Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check per section 5.4.2 due PPCS calculation of RCS Mass Balance Leak Rate program is non-functional.
  • Calculated Leak Rate prior to performance of a Manual Calculation of the RCS Mass Balance Leak Rate Check per OP-KW-OSP-RCS-001 was 0.119 gpm.

THE STEPS IN THIS JPM SHOULD BE: PERFORMED THIS TASK IS NOT TIME CRITICAL INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

REVIEW Attachment B of OP-KW-OSP-RCS-001 AND IDENTIFY ALL actions that are required to be implemented.

INFORM THE EVALUATOR WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED THE TASK Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 12 of 14

SO-36-JP031, Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check, Rev A JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.

REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A

1. Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
2. Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
3. Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
4. Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
5. Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
6. Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
7. If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
8. Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
9. Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
10. Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical /

Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?

11. Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
12. Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
13. Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?

All questions/statements must be answered YES or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.

_Stephen Johnson___06/30/09 __________________________

Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 13 of 14

SO-36-JP031, Perform A Manual Reactor Coolant System Leak Rate Check, Rev A Historical Record:

  • New.

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 14 of 14

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)

SITE: KPS JPM TITLE: Determine Allowable Overtime JPM NUMBER: SO-119-JP42A REV. A RELATED PRA None INFORMATION:

TASK NUMBER(S) / 1190420302 / Control hours worked as established by the Overtime Policy TASK TITLE(S):

K/A NUMBERS: 2.1.5 RO / SRO Imp 2.9 / 3.9 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:

Discussion: Simulate/walkthrough: Perform: X EVALUATION LOCATION: In-Plant: Control Room:

Simulator: X Other: X Classroom Lab:

Time for Completion: 16 Minutes Time Critical: No Alternate Path / Faulted: No TASK APPLICABILITY: SRO Additional signatures may be added as needed.

Developed by: Stephen Johnson /s 06/30/09 Instructor Date Validated by: Andy Fahrenkrug /s 07/01/09 Validation Instructor Date (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)

Approved by: Ethan Treptow /s 07/01/09 Facility Representative Date JPM Number: SO-119-JP42A Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 1 of 10

SO-119-JP42A, Determine Allowable Overtime, Rev. A Determine Allowable Overtime JPM

Title:

Examinee: Evaluator:

Job

Title:

Date:

Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS: SAT: UNSAT:

COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).

EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:

NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.

JPM BRIEFING/TURNOVER Read to Examinee:

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 2 of 10

SO-119-JP42A, Determine Allowable Overtime, Rev. A DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.

You may use any approved reference materials normally available including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, and log entries as if the evolution is actually being performed.

AOP and EOP Immediate Actions are required to be performed from memory. After completing immediate action steps without using the procedure, you may then use any approved reference materials.

If this JPM is performed on the simulator, the JPM administrator should only give cues that are not indicated on the simulator. If simulator indication is sufficient to indicate the completion of a step, the JPM administrator should not have to give a cue to the trainee to continue the evolution.

1. Human Performance attributes should be visible. The student may use STAR and or request Peer Checks.
2. If peer checks are requested, the Instructor should reply - Peer Check Acknowledged. The instructor will acknowledge use of the human performance tool and not validate the proper component manipulation.

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues.

When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

INITIAL CONDITIONS:

  • You are the Shift Manager.
  • The plant has been operating at 100% power for the past 30 days.
  • A crew is needed to cover a 12-hour shift due to fill in for another crew, which suffered a common illness.
  • The crew work history including todays proposed shift is attached.

THE STEPS IN THIS JPM SHOULD BE: PERFORMED THIS TASK IS NOT TIME CRITICAL INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

Determine the ability of the crew members to complete the scheduled work hours without additional authorization(s).

INFORM THE EVALUATOR WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED THE TASK Do you have any questions before we begin? - Answer applicable questions Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 3 of 10

SO-119-JP42A, Determine Allowable Overtime, Rev. A JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION NOTE: Review GNP-05.16.06, ATTACHMENT A for Time Dependent Operator Actions. If the JPM addresses one of these tasks and the JPM is determined to be time critical or contain time critical performance steps, then GNP-05.16.06 will be included in the General References below. [OTH 12765]

Required Materials: Attached work schedule; NAD-03.08 General

References:

NAD-03.08, Rev. 8 Task Standards: Crew hours reviewed and the following limitations identified:

1. RO2 will exceed 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> in a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period and does not have a break period of at least 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> between work shifts.
2. The EO will exceed 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> in a seven-day period.

Start Time:

NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee. Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).

NOTE: Critical steps are marked with a Y/Yes below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.

Performance Step: 1 Review the current work schedule for all crew members in relation to the overtime Critical: No limits identified in NAD-03.08, step 5.2.1 through 5.2.5.

Standard:

Check each individual for the following limitations:

  • No more than 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> straight worked.
  • No more than 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> worked in any 24-hour period.
  • No more than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> worked in any 48-hour period.
  • No more than 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> worked in any seven-day period.
  • An 8-hour beak is allowed between work periods.

Evaluator Note:

The above hours except for the last item are exclusive of turnover time, which is identified in the work schedule.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 4 of 10

SO-119-JP42A, Determine Allowable Overtime, Rev. A Performance Step: 2 Identify RO2 schedule has work of 17 hours1.967593e-4 days <br />0.00472 hours <br />2.810847e-5 weeks <br />6.4685e-6 months <br /> in a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period and does not have Critical: Yes a rest period of at least 8-hours between work shifts.

Standard:

  • Determine that RO2 exceeds the allowable work time of 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> in a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period during the shift.

OR

  • Determine that a rest period of at least 8-hours is not provided for RO2 between the Day 7 and Today work schedules.

Evaluator Note:

The performer may identify that the individual may be allowed to work the additional hours if Appendix A is evaluated, AND authorization to exceed specified overtime limits is be documented per Section 5.4. AND approved by a Manager and the Plant Manager (Nuclear), or above, prior to exceeding overtime limits.

Day 7 work 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> (0600-1800) and Today work 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> but 5 of those hours are within the same 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period extending from Day 7 for a total of 17 hours1.967593e-4 days <br />0.00472 hours <br />2.810847e-5 weeks <br />6.4685e-6 months <br />.

Per NAD-03.08, 5.2.3, A break of at least 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> shall be allowed between the end of the current work period and the next scheduled shift, including shift turnover time.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 5 of 10

SO-119-JP42A, Determine Allowable Overtime, Rev. A Performance Step: 3 Identify EO schedule has 76 hours8.796296e-4 days <br />0.0211 hours <br />1.256614e-4 weeks <br />2.8918e-5 months <br /> in a 7-day period.

Critical: Yes Standard:

Determine that the EO exceeds the allowable work time of 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> in a seven-day period during the shift.

Evaluator Note:

The performer may identify that the individual may be allowed to work the additional hours if Appendix A is evaluated, AND authorization to exceed specified overtime limits is be documented per Section 5.4. AND approved by a Manager and the Plant Manager (Nuclear), or above, prior to exceeding overtime limits.

Day 2 the EO worked 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> and has also worked four 12-hour shifts for a total of 64 hours7.407407e-4 days <br />0.0178 hours <br />1.058201e-4 weeks <br />2.4352e-5 months <br /> up to todays shift. If todays shift is worked, EO will have worked a total of 76 hours8.796296e-4 days <br />0.0211 hours <br />1.256614e-4 weeks <br />2.8918e-5 months <br /> in the 7-day period.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Terminating Cues: When the performer has evaluated the individuals for satisfying the overtime requirements, This JPM is complete.

Stop Time:

During the evaluation, the trainee: Evaluation

  • Performed the task correctly and in accordance with procedure PASS FAIL usage and adherence requirements.
  • Never put anyones safety at risk. PASS FAIL
  • Never put equipment reliability at risk. PASS FAIL
  • Never violated radiological work practices. PASS FAIL
  • Demonstrated effective use of event-free human performance PASS FAIL tools.

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 6 of 10

SO-119-JP42A, Rev. A TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:

  • You are the Shift Manager.
  • The plant has been operating at 100% power for the past 30 days.
  • A crew is needed to cover a 12-hour shift due to fill in for another crew, which suffered a common illness.
  • The crew work history including todays proposed shift is attached.

THE STEPS IN THIS JPM SHOULD BE: PERFORMED THIS TASK IS NOT TIME CRITICAL INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

Determine the ability of the crew members to complete the scheduled work hours without additional authorization(s).

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 7 of 10

SO-119-JP42A, Review SP-033-065, Determine Allowable Overtime, Rev. A DAY 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Today 1800 - 0600 0800 - 1600 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 SM 1730 - 1800 TO OFF 0600 - 1800 (Admin work) 0525 - 0600 TO 0535 - 0600 TO 0530 - 0600 TO 0535 - 0600 TO 1800 - 0600 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 US 1735 - 1800 TO OFF OFF 0600 - 1800 0540 - 0600 TO 0535 - 0600 TO 0535 - 0600 TO 0530 - 0600 TO 1800 - 0600 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 RO1 1745 - 1800 TO OFF OFF 0600 - 1800 0540 - 0600 TO 0535 - 0600 TO 0545 - 0600 TO 0535 - 0600 TO 1800 - 0600 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0100 - 1300 RO2 1740 - 1800 TO OFF OFF 0545 - 0600 TO 0545 - 0600 TO 0535 - 0600 TO 0545 - 0600 TO (early call-in) 1800 - 0600 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 1200 - 2400 STA 1740 - 1800 TO OFF OFF 0540 - 0600 TO 0540 - 0600 TO 0540 - 0600 TO 0540 - 0600 TO (late holdover) 1800 - 0600 0600 - 1200 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 AO 1740 - 1800 TO OFF 0600 - 1800 0545 - 0600 TO 0545 - 0600 TO 0540 - 0600 TO 0535 - 0600 TO 0535 - 0600 TO 0600 - 2200 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 0600 - 1800 EO OFF OFF 0600 - 1800 0550 - 0600 TO 0540 - 0600 TO 0545 - 0600 TO 0535 - 0600 TO 0540 - 0600 TO TO indicates the time that was spent for shift turnover activities.

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 8 of 10

SO-119-JP42A, Review SP-033-065, Determine Allowable Overtime, Rev. A ATTACHMENT 1 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.

REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A

1. Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
2. Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
3. Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
4. Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
5. Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
6. Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
7. If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
8. Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
9. Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
10. Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical /

Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?

11. Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
12. Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
13. Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?

All questions/statements must be answered YES or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.

Andy Fahrenkrug / 07/01/09 __________________________

Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Mark Lorger / 07/01/09 __________________________

Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 9 of 10

SO-119-JP42A, Review SP-033-065, Determine Allowable Overtime, Rev. A Historical Record:

Rev. A - 06/30/2009

  • New.

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 10 of 10

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)

SITE: KPS JPM TITLE: Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable Equipment JPM NUMBER: SO-119-JP191 REV. A RELATED PRA 4160 V Electrical System (Including offsite sources) is ranked the 7th system for INFORMATION: importance to At-Power CDF & the 12th system for importance to At-Power LERF.

TASK NUMBER(S) / 1190190302 / Apply Technical Specifications during plant operations TASK TITLE(S):

K/A NUMBERS: 2.2.44 RO / SRO Imp 4.2 / 4.4 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:

Discussion: Simulate/walkthrough: Perform: X EVALUATION LOCATION: In-Plant: Control Room:

Simulator: X Other:

Lab:

Time for Completion: 15 Minutes Time Critical: Yes 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> Alternate Path / Faulted: Yes TASK APPLICABILITY: SRO Additional signatures may be added as needed.

Developed by: Stephen Johnson /s 07/01/09 Instructor Date Validated by: Andy Fahrenkrug /s 06/29/09 Validation Instructor Date (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)

Approved by: Ethan Treptow /s 07/01/09 Facility Representative Date Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 1 of 13

SO-119-JP191, Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable Equipment, Rev. 1 JPM Number: SO-119-JP191 Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable JPM

Title:

Equipment Examinee: Evaluator:

Job

Title:

Date:

Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS: SAT: UNSAT:

COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).

EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:

NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 2 of 13

SO-119-JP191, Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable Equipment, Rev. 1 JPM BRIEFING/TURNOVER Read to Examinee:

DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.

You may use any approved reference materials normally available including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, and log entries as if the evolution is actually being performed.

AOP and EOP Immediate Actions are required to be performed from memory. After completing immediate action steps without using the procedure, you may then use any approved reference materials.

If this JPM is performed on the simulator, the JPM administrator should only give cues that are not indicated on the simulator. If simulator indication is sufficient to indicate the completion of a step, the JPM administrator should not have to give a cue to the trainee to continue the evolution.

1. Human Performance attributes should be visible. The student may use STAR and or request Peer Checks.
2. If peer checks are requested, the Instructor should reply - Peer Check Acknowledged. The instructor will acknowledge use of the human performance tool and not validate the proper component manipulation.

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues.

When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

INITIAL CONDITIONS:

  • You are the Shift Manager.
  • The plant operating at approximately 100% power.
  • All initial operator actions for the plant conditions have been taken.

THE STEPS IN THIS JPM SHOULD BE: PERFORMED THIS TASK IS TIME CRITICAL INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

Determine ALL applicable Technical Specifications and the associated ACTIONS required based on the plant conditions.

INFORM THE EVALUATOR WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED THE TASK Do you have any questions before we begin? - Answer applicable questions Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 3 of 13

SO-119-JP191, Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable Equipment, Rev. 1 JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION NOTE: Review GNP-05.16.06, ATTACHMENT A for Time Dependent Operator Actions. If the JPM addresses one of these tasks and the JPM is determined to be time critical or contain time critical performance steps, then GNP-05.16.06 will be included in the General References below.

[OTH 12765]

Required Materials: KPS Technical Specifications General

References:

KPS Technical Specifications Task Standards: Identify all Technical Specification ACTIONS associated with inoperable ICS Pump and TAT; AND, Identify that with ICS Pump B OOS and the TAT unavailable as off-site power source to Bus 5, BOTH Trains of Spray Pumps are inoperable. TS ACTION requires entry into TS 3.0.c, with action required within ONE hour.

Start Time:

NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee. Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).

NOTE: Critical steps are marked with a Y/Yes below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 4 of 13

SO-119-JP191, Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable Equipment, Rev. 1 Performance Step: 1 Identify plant conditions:

Critical: No Standard:

Determine the following:

  • TAT Out of Service due to lockout.

Evaluator Cue:

If asked about ICS (Containment Spray) Pump B: ICS Pump B has been out of service for 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> for pump overhaul per CMP 23-10, Containment Spray System (ICS) (QA-1) Containment Spray Pump Overhaul. The expected outage time for the pump is estimated to be 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> from this time.

For evaluation purposes the TAT lockout has just occurred at current time. All initial actions required in response to the lockout have been completed as directed in ARP 47083-E, 47083-H and AOP-EHV-005. There is no estimate yet on outage time although severe damage is reported to the TAT.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 5 of 13

SO-119-JP191, Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable Equipment, Rev. 1 Performance Step: 2 TAT TS:

Critical: Yes 3.7.a The reactor shall not be made critical unless all of the following requirements are satisfied:

2. A second external source of power is fully operational and energized to supply power to emergency buses 1-5 and 1-6.

LCO 3.7.b During power operation or recovery from inadvertent trip, any of the following conditions of inoperability may exist during the time intervals specified. If OPERABILITY is not restored within the time specified, then within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> action shall be initiated to achieve HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.

1. Either auxiliary transformer may be out of service for a period not exceeding 7 days provided the other auxiliary transformer and both diesel generators are OPERABLE.

3.7.c When its normal or emergency power source is inoperable, a system, train or component may be considered OPERABLE for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of its applicable LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION, provided:

1. Its corresponding normal or emergency power source is OPERABLE; and
2. Its redundant system, train, or component is OPERABLE.

Standard:

1. Identify 7-day LCO period with TAT inoperable.
2. Affects Train A equipment OPERABILITY in that Train A Electrical Distribution system supplied via the DG A must be OPERABLE, AND Train B required equipment must be OPERABLE.

Evaluator Note:

Item 2 of the STANDARD need NOT be directly identified at the time the TAT TS is identified, but will be implicitly addressed in correct identification of actions as stated in PERFORMANCE STEP 4.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 6 of 13

SO-119-JP191, Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable Equipment, Rev. 1 Performance Step: 3 ICS Pump TS:

Critical: Yes 3.3.c.1 Containment Spray and Containment Fancoil Units A. The reactor shall not be made critical unless the following conditions are satisfied, except for LOW POWER PHYSICS TESTING and except as provided by TS 3.3.c.1.A.3.

1. Two containment spray trains are OPERABLE with each train comprised of:

(i) One Containment Spray Pump (ii) An OPERABLE flow path consisting of all valves and piping associated with the above train of components and required to function during accident conditions. This flow path shall be capable of taking suction from the Refueling Water Storage Tank.

LCO 3.3.c.1.C During power operation or recovery from an inadvertent trip, any one of the following the following conditions of inoperability may exist during the time interval specified. If OPERABILITY is not restored within the time specified, then within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> action shall be initiated to:

- Achieve HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.

- Achieve HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.

- Achieve COLD SHUTDOWN within an additional 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />.

(ii) One containment spray train may be out of service for 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> provided the opposite containment spray train remains OPERABLE.

Standard:

1. Determine Containment Spray Pump B is inoperable due to maintenance on pump with 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> allowed outage time.
2. Identify that Containment Spray Pump A also inoperable based on conditions from TS 3.7.c. The LCO for TS 3.3.c.1is NOT met.

Evaluator Note:

Item 2 of the STANDARD need NOT be directly identified at the time the Containment Spray TS is identified, but will be implicitly addressed in correct identification of actions as stated in PERFORMANCE STEP 4.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 7 of 13

SO-119-JP191, Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable Equipment, Rev. 1 Performance Step: 4 Determine most limiting Technical Specification ACTION.

Critical: Yes Standard: Identify TWO Containment Spray Trains inoperable resulting in entry into TS 3.0.c Standard Shutdown Sequence such that within one hour action shall be initiated to place the unit in a MODE in which the Specification does not apply.

Evaluator Note:

TS 3.0.c reads:

When a LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION is not met, and a plant shutdown is required except as provided in the associated ACTION requirements, within one hour action shall be initiated to place the unit in a MODE in which the Specification does not apply by placing it, as applicable, in:

1. At least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />,
2. At least HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, and
3. At least COLD SHUTDOWN within the subsequent 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Terminating Cues: When the performer has reported the actions he/she identifies as required, This JPM is complete.

Stop Time:

During the evaluation, the trainee: Evaluation

  • Performed the task correctly and in accordance with procedure PASS FAIL usage and adherence requirements.
  • Never put anyones safety at risk. PASS FAIL
  • Never put equipment reliability at risk. PASS FAIL
  • Never violated radiological work practices. PASS FAIL
  • Demonstrated effective use of event-free human performance PASS FAIL tools.

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 8 of 13

SO-119-JP191, Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable Equipment, Rev. 1 SIMULATOR SET UP:

Any 100% power Steady state condition INPUT

SUMMARY

Delay Ramp Event Severity Final Relative Description Time Time Trigger Or Value Value Order MALFUNCTIONS ED13 TAT Overcurrent 00:00:00 00:00:00 2 FALSE TRUE 2 REMOTE FUNCTIONS CH105 AFW Pump A FCU 00:00:00 00:00:00 3 AUTO TOGGLE 3 CH103 RHR Pump A Pump Pit FCU 00:00:00 00:00:00 3 AUTO TOGGLE 3 SW107 SW-1306A Reset Switch AUTO/RESET 00:00:00 00:00:00 3 AUTO RESET 3 SW108 SW-1306B Reset Switch AUTO/RESET 00:00:00 00:00:00 3 AUTO RESET 3 OVERRIDES DO-46479-G ICS-2B 00:00:00 00:00:00 1 OFF OFF 1 DO-46353-G ICS-5B 00:00:00 00:00:00 1 OFF OFF 1 DO-46354-G ICS-6B 00:00:00 00:00:00 1 OFF OFF 1 DO-46323-G RHR-400B 00:00:00 00:00:00 1 OFF OFF 1 TRIGGERS

1. Reset to IC and place Simulator in RUN.
2. If snapped IC is used, verify initial conditions and place the Simulator in Freeze.
3. Establish ICS Pump B OOS:
a. Place ICS Pump B handswitch to PULLOUT and tag.
b. Verify CLOSED the following valves:
i. ICS-2B, CNTMT SPRAY PUMP B SUCTION FROM RWST ii. ICS-5B, CNTMT SPRAY PUMP B DISCHARGE ISOLATION iii. ICS-6B, CNTMT SPRAY PUMP B DISCHARGE ISOLATION iv. RHR-400B, RHR PUMP B SUPPLY TO ICS PUMP B
c. Actuate TRIGGER 1 to remove Green indicating light power from the valves above.
d. Place TAGOUT covers on each of the valves above.

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 9 of 13

SO-119-JP191, Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable Equipment, Rev. 1

e. On SHIFT Manager board write, ICS Pump B OOS for overhaul per CMP 23-10 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> ago.
f. Acknowledge annunciator.
4. Establish Bus 5 loaded from DG A with TAT overcurrent:
a. Initiate TRIGGER 2 (ED13) for TAT overcurrent condition (67X/CR10).
b. Place Heater Drain Pump (HDP) A in CR MAN and adjust both HDP A AND HDP B speed to stabilize Heater Drain Tank level (above 30%, if possible).
c. If opened, CLOSE C-13 and verify FW Pump suction pressure greater than 240 psig.
d. Stop AFW Pump A and place in AUTO.
e. Start Charging Pump A and establish Przr Level control. Place Charging Pump A in AUTO when level stabilized.
f. Place CC Pump B control switch to START and allow return to AUTO. Place CC Pump A control switch to STOP and AUTO.
g. Open BT-2A and BT-3B to reestablish SG Blowdown flow.
h. Open BT-31A/BT-31B to reestablish SG sampling.
i. Start CFCUs A and B.
j. Reset SW1306A/B open signal by actuating TRIGGER 3 to RESET Remote Functions SW107 and SW108. Restore to AUTO and delete Remote Functions.
k. Verify Shutdown AFW Pump A FCU and RHR Pump A Pump Pit FCU (TRIGGER 3) to TOGGLE Remote Functions CH105 and CH103, respectively. Restore to AUTO and delete Remote Functions.
l. Stop CRPAR Fan A. Reset Control Room Air Conditioning by placing CRAC B control switch in ON, then taking CRAC A control switch to OFF then AUTO.
m. Reset Generator Radio Frequency (RF) Monitor by depressing the WARNING Alarm and SHUTDOWN Alarm pushbuttons.
n. Reset TURBINE VIBRATION alarm by taking COMMON RESET toggle to RESET on lower Vibration Panel of Turbine Supervisory Panel.
o. Reset R-11/R-12 sampling by opening AS-1, and then place R-11/R-12 Pump Control to OFF/RESET then to ON by taking the R-11/R-12.
5. Acknowledge any alarms.
6. IF desired, the IC in this condition may be snapped to a temporary IC and maintained for use.

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 10 of 13

SO-119-JP191, Rev. A TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:

  • You are the Shift Manager.
  • The plant operating at approximately 100% power.
  • All initial operator actions for the plant conditions have been taken.

THE STEPS IN THIS JPM SHOULD BE: PERFORMED THIS TASK IS TIME CRITICAL INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

Determine ALL applicable Technical Specifications and the associated ACTIONS required based on the plant conditions.

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 11 of 13

SO-119-JP191, Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable Equipment, Rev. A ATTACHMENT 1 JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.

REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A

1. Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
2. Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
3. Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
4. Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
5. Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
6. Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
7. If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
8. Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
9. Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
10. Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical /

Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?

11. Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
12. Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
13. Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?

All questions/statements must be answered YES or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written. The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.

Stephen Johnson / 06/30/09 __________________________

Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Andy Fahrenkrug / 06/29/09 __________________________

Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Mark Lorger / 06/30/09 __________________________

Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Historical Record:

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 12 of 13

SO-119-JP191, Determine Appropriate Actions For System Operations With Inoperable Equipment, Rev. A Rev. A - 06/29/2009

  • New.

Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 13 of 13

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE (JPM)

SITE: Kewaunee Power Station JPM TITLE: Review and Approval of Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit JPM NUMBER: SO-119-JP03B REV. A RELATED PRA None INFORMATION:

TASK NUMBER(S) / 1190030102/ Direct Discharge of radiological liquid waste TASK TITLE(S):

K/A NUMBERS: 2.3.6 Ability to approve release permits IMP 3.8 APPLICABLE METHOD OF TESTING:

Discussion: Simulate/walkthrough: Perform: X EVALUATION LOCATION: In-Plant: Control Room:

Simulator: X Other: X Classroom Lab:

Time for Completion: 15 Minutes Time Critical: NO Alternate Path / Faulted: NO TASK APPLICABILITY: SRO Additional signatures may be added as needed.

Developed by: Andrew Fahrenkrug /s 07/01/09 Instructor Date Validated by: Stephen Johnson /s 07/01/09 Validation Instructor Date (See JPM Validation Checklist, Attachment 1)

Reviewed by: Dave Shields /s 07/01/09 Chemistry Instructor Date Approved by: Ethan Treptow /s 07/01/09 Facility Representative Date Form NTP-6331 Rev. A Date: JAN 19 2006 Page 1 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A JPM Number: SO-119-JP03B Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit JPM

Title:

Examinee: Evaluator:

Job

Title:

Date:

Start Time Finish Time PERFORMANCE RESULTS: SAT: UNSAT:

COMMENTS/FEEDBACK: (Comments shall be made for any steps graded unsatisfactory).

EVALUATORS SIGNATURE:

NOTE: Only this page needs to be retained in examinees record if completed satisfactorily. If unsatisfactory performance is demonstrated, the entire JPM should be retained.

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 2 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A JPM BRIEFING/TURNOVER Read to Examinee:

DURING THE JPM, ENSURE PROPER SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, FME, AND/OR RADIOLOGICAL CONCERNS AS APPLICABLE ARE FOLLOWED.

You may use any approved reference materials normally available including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, and log entries as if the evolution is actually being performed.

AOP and EOP Immediate Actions are required to be performed from memory. After completing immediate action steps without using the procedure, you may then use any approved reference materials.

If this JPM is performed on the simulator, the JPM administrator should only give cues that are not indicated on the simulator. If simulator indication is sufficient to indicate the completion of a step, the JPM administrator should not have to give a cue to the trainee to continue the evolution.

1. Human Performance attributes should be visible. The student may use STAR and or request Peer Checks.
2. If peer checks are requested, the Instructor should reply - Peer Check Acknowledged. The instructor will acknowledge use of the human performance tool and not validate the proper component manipulation.

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues.

When you complete the task successfully, the objective for this job performance measure will be satisfied.

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 3 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A INITIAL CONDITIONS:

  • You are the Shift Manager.
  • Current Plant Conditions are as follows:

3/4 Power was reduced to maintain vacuum following stopping CW pump 1B due to high vibrations at 0035 o Generation at 540 MWe Gross o 90% NI Power o Thermal Power 1593 MWt 3/4 Actions to discharge CVC Monitor Tank 1A are in progress per NOP-CVC-007, CVC Monitor Tanks and Pumps.

o CVC Monitor Tank 1A has been sampled Yesterday at 2200 per NOP-CVC-007, CVC Monitor Tanks and Pumps THE STEPS IN THIS JPM SHOULD BE: PERFORMED THIS TASK IS NOT TIME CRITICAL INITIATING CUES (IF APPLICABLE):

APPROVE the Liquid Waste Discharge Permit for CVC Monitor Tank 1A.

Evaluator Note:

After covering the initial conditions and initiating CUE then give the student Attachment A and the marked up copy of NOP-CVC-001 for sampling of CVC Monitor Tank 1A Attachment D.

INFORM THE EVALUATOR WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED THE TASK Do you have any questions before we begin? - Answer applicable questions Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 4 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A JPM PERFORMANCE INFORMATION NOTE: Review GNP-05.16.06, ATTACHMENT A for Time Dependent Operator Actions. If the JPM addresses one of these tasks and the JPM is determined to be time critical or contain time critical performance steps, then GNP-05.16.06 will be included in the General References below.

[OTH 12765]

NOTE: If this JPM is performed in the Simulator Control Room do not provide the student with any materials other than the turn over sheet.

Required Materials: Training Discharge Permit Attachment A (Faulted before the discharge)

Training Discharge Permit Attachment B (Not Faulted before the discharge)

Training Discharge Permit Attachment C (Faulted After Discharge is Complete)

NOP-CVC-007 Rev 1, CVC Monitor Tanks and Pumps- Marked Up Copy for Sampling CVC Monitor Tank 1A NOP-CVC-007 Rev 1, CVC Monitor Tanks and Pumps - Marked Up copy after discharge complete SP-32A-136 Rev 33, Radiological Discharges (Batch Mode)

Calculator General

References:

NOP-CVC-007, CVC Monitor Tanks and Pumps.

SP-32A-136, Radiological Discharges (Batch Mode)

Task Standards: 1. Identify incorrect number CW pumps running and associated Minimum Dilution Flow on Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit (Attachment A)

2. Approve Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit (Attachment B)
3. Identify Initial Tank Level greater than 2% different from tank level at the time of sampling.

Start Time:

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 5 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A NOTE: When providing Evaluator Cues to the examinee, care must be exercised to avoid prompting the examinee. Typically cues are only provided when the examinees actions warrant receiving the information (i.e. the examinee looks or asks for the indication).

NOTE: Critical steps are marked with a Yes below the performance step number. Failure to meet the standard for any critical step shall result in failure of this JPM.

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 6 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A Performance Step: 1 Approval and Disposition of Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit Critical: Yes Standard: (c) Identify incorrect number CW pumps running and associated Minimum Dilution Flow on Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit Evaluator Cue: IF the performer signs the original Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit (Attachment A) without fixing the fault THEN state This Concludes the JPM and terminate JPM.

Evaluator Cue: IF the performer signs the original Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit (Attachment A) after fixing the fault by lining out the incorrect values and inserting correct values, correct values would be: 1 CW and 200,000 gpm, THEN State This Concludes the JPM and Terminate JPM.

Evaluator Cue: IF the performer identifies the fault in the Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit THEN Acknowledge the fault and give the performer Attachment B and state The Chemistry Tech has created a new discharge permit.

IF the performer identifies the fault and contacts chemistry/AO for a new discharge permit THEN Acknowledge the fault and provide Attachment B to the performer stating A new Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit has been created.

Evaluator Cue: IF asked if A CW pump is running THEN respond A CW pump is running Evaluator Cue: IF asked if R-18 is operating THEN respond R-18 is operating Evaluator Cue: IF the performer states will log approval then respond Acknowledge logging Evaluator Note: Attachment A has the fault of incorrect number of CW pumps running and associated Minimum Dilution Flow Attachment B has no faults Evaluator Note: IF the performer fixes the Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit (Attachment A) by lining out and initial the error and entering the correct values of 1 CW and 200,000 gpm and then signs Attachment A, the performer has NOT successfully completed this step, the Tritium Concentration Number will be incorrect Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 7 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A Performance Step: 2 Approve Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit Critical: Yes Standard: (c) Approve Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit Evaluator Cue: IF the performer approves the Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit THEN perform the following:

1. Take the Radiological Liquid Waste Permit (Attachment B) from the performer
2. State the following The discharge of CVC Monitor Tank 1A was performed per NOP-CVC-007 and the AO has routed the completed Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit for your Approval and Disposition.
3. Provide the student with the completed Radiological Liquid Waste Permit (Attachment C)
4. Provide the student with a marked up copy of NOP-CVC-007 for completing the discharge of CVC Monitor Tank 1A. (Attachment E)

Evaluator Cue: IF the performer does not approve the Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Permit THEN state This concludes the JPM and Terminate the JPM.

Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 8 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A Performance Step: 3 Review for Disposition completed Radiological Liquid Waste Discharge Critical: Yes Permit Standard: (c) Identify Initial Tank Level greater than 2% different from tank level at the time of sampling.

Evaluator Cue: IF the performer identifies that the initial tank level is greater than 2% different from the tank level at the time of sampling THEN:

  • IF contacted as AO THEN respond The initial tank level is correct I made an error and did not recognize the greater than 2% difference from tank level at the time of sampling
  • IF contacted as Chemistry THEN respond Will Take actions IAW with SP-32A-136, Radiological Discharges (Batch Mode).
  • IF the performer states that they will initiate a CR THEN respond Acknowledge Initiation of CR Performance: SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY Comments:

Terminating Cues: When the performer has completed review for the second discharge permit This JPM is complete.

Stop Time: ________

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 9 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A During the evaluation, the trainee: Evaluation

  • Performed the task correctly and in accordance with procedure PASS FAIL usage and adherence requirements.
  • Never put anyones safety at risk. PASS FAIL
  • Never put equipment reliability at risk. PASS FAIL
  • Never violated radiological work practices. PASS FAIL
  • Demonstrated effective use of event-free human performance PASS FAIL tools.

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 10 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A SIMULATOR SET UP:

  • None Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 11 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 12 of 15

TURNOVER SHEET INITIAL CONDITIONS:

  • You are the Shift Manager.
  • Current Plant Conditions are as follows:

3/4 Power was reduced to maintain vacuum following stopping CW pump 1B due to high vibrations at 0035 o Generation at 540 MWe Gross o 90% NI Power o Thermal Power 1593 MWt 3/4 Actions to discharge CVC Monitor Tank 1A are in progress per NOP-CVC-007, CVC Monitor Tanks and Pumps.

o CVC Monitor Tank 1A has been sampled Yesterday at 2200 per NOP-CVC-007, CVC Monitor Tanks and Pumps THE STEPS IN THIS JPM SHOULD BE: PERFORMED THIS TASK IS NOT TIME CRITICAL INITIATING CUES: APPROVE the Liquid Waste Discharge Permit for CVC Monitor Tank 1A.

INFORM THE EVALUATOR WHEN YOU HAVE COMPLETED THE TASK Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 13 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE VALIDATION CHECKLIST ALL STEPS IN THIS CHECKLIST ARE TO BE PERFORMED UPON INITIAL VALIDATION AND PRIOR TO USE.

REVIEW STATEMENTS YES NO N/A

1. Are all items on the signature page filled in correctly?
2. Has the JPM been reviewed and validated by SMEs?
3. Can the required conditions for the JPM be appropriately established in the simulator if required?
4. Does the performance steps accurately reflect trainees actions in accordance with plant procedures?
5. Is the standard for each performance item specific as to what controls, indications and ranges are required to evaluate if the trainee properly performed the step?
6. Has the completion time been established based on validation data or incumbent experience?
7. If the task is time critical, is the time critical portion based upon actual task performance requirements?
8. Is the Licensee level appropriate for the task being evaluated if required?
9. Is the K/A appropriate to the task and to the licensee level if required?
10. Have the performance steps been identified and typed (Critical /

Sequence / Time Critical) appropriately?

11. Have all special tools and equipment needed to perform the task been identified and made available to the trainee?
12. Are all references identified, current, accurate, and available to the trainee?
13. Have all required cues (as anticipated) been identified for the evaluator to assist task completion?

All questions/statements must be answered YES or N/A or the JPM is not valid for use. If all questions/statements are answered YES then the JPM is considered valid and can be performed as written.

The individual(s) performing the validation shall sign and date this form.

Stephen Johnson____07/01/09 __________________________

Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Validation Personnel /Date Validation Personnel/Date Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 14 of 15

SO-119-JP03B, Review and Approve Liquid Radiological Waste Discharge Permit, Rev. A Historical Record:

  • New.

Retention: Life of plant insurance policy + 10 years Retain in: Training Program File Form NTP-6331 Rev. B Date: DEC 05 2007 Page 15 of 15