ML090500266
| ML090500266 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 10/21/2005 |
| From: | Sandlike S Entergy Corp |
| To: | Noggle J NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| Download: ML090500266 (3) | |
Text
rues N ogg.!em:
t're minary a9lutlon ana_ aose caic
.'age 1
From:
"Sandike, Steven" <SSandik@entergy.com>
To:
"Leach, Don" <DLeach@entergy.com>, "Quinn, Dennis" <ýdquin91 @entergy.com>,
..dquinn@daq-inc.com'" <dquinn@daq-inc.com>, "Axelson, William L" <WAxelso@entergy.com>,
<JDN@nrc.gov>, "Lavera, Ron" <RLavera@entergy.com>, "Re, Gary" <GRe@entergy.com>
Date:
10/21/05 3:16PM
Subject:
Preliminary dilution and dose calc All...
I spoke with the NRC and we are all of one mind with regard to the substantial work still needed from -the hydrologist and the rest of us to determine the actual dilution flows, etc.... But to provide the best estimate today, I reviewed the dilution factor parameters in the ODCM, their source documents, and basis reg guides (including RG 1.113 from Gary. Re).
Attached is an estimate I put together today, knowing that we must all do significantly more work on the dilution factor to be more confident of the actual values.
<<prelim-dose-calc.pdf>>
Steve Sandike Effluents / RMS ENN Indian Point Energy Center Buchanan, NY 10511-0308 phone: 914-736-8455 fax:
914-734-6010 email: ssandik@entergy.com CC:
"Wilson, Daniel" <DWilson@entergy.com>
In;ontEn tergy In-dian Point NPIP Oct 21, 2005 IPEC-CHM-05-034 MEMORANDUM TO: D. LEACH - Unit 2 SFP Integrity Issue Team Leader FROM:
S. SANDIKE - Sr. CHEMISTRY SPECIALIST
SUBJECT:
DERIVATION OF DILUTION FLOW AND DOSE CALCULATIONS The key element in producing a valid bounding calculation for potential offsite dose from Spent Fuel Pool releases to the bedrock (bypassing the discharge canal) is the determination of a dilution factor into the Hudson directly. While it is very conservative to assume NO dilution from circulator or service water pumps, it is not appropriate to imagine there is no dilution from natural sources.
The terms used in the calculation for dilution factor are defined in NUREG 0133 (pages 15-16) and involve and understanding of not only the released fluid and receiving body of water, but also an "applicable factor" that includes consideration for mixing effects in the near field. For this calculation, which is clearly outside the ODCM, determination of the volume of the receiving body of water (the applicable portion of the Hudson) and the "applicable factor" need to be re-evaluated before routine Reg Guide 1.109 methodology for dose calculations may be applied.
Assuming (from reports by the site Hydrologist) that a good worst-case assumption of the transport of SFP water into the Hudson is under the canal, into the sediment, and upwards into the river, we can determine a "near field dilution factor", per NUREG 0133 as follows:
Fe =
liquid waste flow discharge srutcure exit flow
- applicable factor This calculations requires knowledge of the exit flow of all fluids from the bedrock into the sediment and then diffused into the Hudson River. It also requires knowledge of the inputs to the "applicable factor".
Much of this information can be determined from an ODCM basis document: "Radio-ecological Studies of the Hudson River", from NYU and Dr. Paul Linsalata (1987). In his report, the factor is identified as a ratio of concentrations effected by stream velocity and cross.sectional area over a chosen distance. We may update this data specifically for releases under the canal and into the sediment as follows:
Applicable Factor = e-uxID Where; U = velocity, approximated by modern flow rate over a chosen area x = the distance over which tidal flow is most apt to apply D = an averaged longitudinal diffusion coefficient for the local area of the river.
Using the assumptions for the original report, and historical stream flows from the effluent reports since 2000, the velocity can be represented by 22,864 cfs /140,000 ft2 or 0.16 ft/sec. The distance over which the tides are likely to move remains the same, as does the diffusion coefficient (-22 miles and 4000 ft2) to provide a value of 104.
The determination of an actual dilution flow rate from natural sources is pending from the site hydrologists. Assuming only 0.01 percent of the average stream flows reported annually are discharged along the bedrock and into the Hudson under Indian Point, an early conservative assessment of this value would be 2.28 cfs or approximately 1,000 gpm. This, in concert with the applicable factor, provides a dilution factor of approximately 100,000 to 1 (approximately 3% of routine releases).
Release Rate I 100 ml/day or 2.64E+00 gpd or
" 0.001834728 gpm Duration of Release, in days Waste.
vol released =
Dilution vol released =
2.40E+02 gal 1.31 E+08 gal Dilution flow I
.0+03 gpm Dil Factor 1.83E-06 Act~ivitV 10CFR26 PRE PS
.<POST5 MCO ISOTOPE_
Release_
~EC'iý%Y DILU77JON~
ZIL~UTIONY"'
~DIWdtION~ ;CURIES H-3 2.00OE-02 1.OOE-02 2.OOE+00 3.67E-08 3.67E-06 1.82E+04 MN-54 3.OOE-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 FE-55 1.OOE-03 0.OOE+0O 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 00-58 2.OOE-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-60 M1.OOE-07 3.OOE-05 3.33E-03 1.83E-13 6.12E-09 9.10E-02 NI-63 1.OOE-03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00
.0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 SR-90 5.OOE-06 0.OOE4-00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 SB-i125 3.OOE-04 0.OOE-.00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 GS-134 8.OOE-07 9.OOE-06 8.89E-02 1.47E-12 1.63E-07 7.28E-01 CSý-137 1.0QE-05 1.OOE&05 1.OOE-.00 1.8311-11 1.83E-06 9.1 OE+00 CO-57 6.OOE-04 0.OOE+00 0.OO12+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 TOTAL 2.00702;.
~
J~:
3.09E+00 3.67E-08-i,:
5.67Ei06.
.2+0.
NUREG 0133 "Applicable Factor" for Near Field Dilution =
EZ~+oL~
Adult Total Body mrem IsOTOPE BONE 7 LIVER TOT BODY
-THYROID-
- KIDNEY, LUNG Gl-LLl H-3 0.OOE+00 2.26E-07 2.26E-07 2.26E-07 2.26E-07 2.26E-07 2.26E-07 MN-54 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 FE-55 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE4"00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-58 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-60 0.OOE+00 5.93E-09 1.31 E-08 0.06E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.11E-07 NI-63 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00:
SR-90 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 SB-1 25 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CS-134 1.33E-06 3.15E-06 2.58E-06 0.OOE+00 1.02E-06 3.40E-07 5.51E-08 CS-137 2.12E-05 2.91E-05 1.90E-05 0.00E+00 9.86E-06 3.28E-06 5.61E-07 CO-57 0.OOE+00 Q-..0
_00 0.00E÷00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E÷00 T:OTAL.
2.261t0 3:24E-o5-7 8
2.262E707K 1.i1E-.5&'ý 3.84E-06 9;
9ý5`4E-O7
,W7-E-6 The very preliminary calculation above indicates that the quarterly doses from the potential release of isotopes from the Unit 2 SFP (even when released with minimal dilution directly to the Hudson along the bedrock) result in less than 1% of our reported quarterly liquid effluent doses.
SS/ss cc: W. Axelson D. Wilson R. Lavera D. Quinn NRC (info only)