ML083460033
| ML083460033 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 12/11/2008 |
| From: | Pickett D Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Harding T Constellation Energy Group |
| Pickett , NRR/DLPM, 415-1364 | |
| References | |
| IWA-2430(d), TAC ME0154 | |
| Download: ML083460033 (2) | |
Text
From:
Douglas Pickett Sent:
Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:22 AM To:
'Harding Jr, Thomas' Cc:
George Thomas (NRR); Kamal Manoly; Mark Kowal; Marshall David
Subject:
Acceptance Review for Ginna Relief Request No. 22 (TAC No. ME0154)
Mr. Harding:
By letter dated November 21, 2008, R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC submitted a relief request for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (TAC No. ME0154). The proposed relief request would provide a three month extension beyond the Code allowed 12 month extension of IWA-2430(d) for the current Containment Inservice Inspection (CISI) interval to enable the CISI and the ASME Class 1, 2, and 3 components Inservice Inspection intervals to coincide.
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concludes that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Consistent with NRC staff procedures, a copy of this email will be made publicly available in ADAMS.
Douglas V. Pickett, Senior Project Manager Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1364 Email: douglas.pickett@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()
Subject:
Acceptance Review for Ginna Relief Request No. 22 (TAC No. ME0154)
Sent Date: 12/11/2008 9:03:56 AM
Received Date: 12/11/2008 9:22:00 AM From: Douglas Pickett Created By: Douglas.Pickett@nrc.gov Recipients:
Thomas.Harding@constellation.com ('Harding Jr, Thomas')
Tracking Status: None George.Thomas2@nrc.gov (George Thomas (NRR))
Tracking Status: None Kamal.Manoly@nrc.gov (Kamal Manoly)
Tracking Status: None Mark.Kowal@nrc.gov (Mark Kowal)
Tracking Status: None Marshall.David@nrc.gov (Marshall David)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 13154 12/11/2008 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: