ML082750537

09 - Post Exam Analysis

ML082750537
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	09/30/2008
From:	Arbour W Southern California Edison Co
To:	Garchow S Operations Branch IV
References
ES-403-1
Download: ML082750537 (3)

Text

SOUTHLRN CAllrolmlA

..... EDISON

\I1 rnrsu,\ "'TLH.\ lno.\\/ C"l1Ip"n~

September 30, 2008 Mr. Steve Garchow USNRC Region IV Texas Health Resources Tower 611 Ryan Plaza, Suite # 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

Dear Mr. Garchow:

Please fmd enclosed the following for the September 2008 San Onofre Written exam; SONGS September 2008 ES-403-1, Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Exam Seating Chart Exam Analysis for the September 2008 SONGS Exam Exam Proctor Fonus documenting applicant questions and clarifications Each Applicants original answer sheet and exam coversheet A clean copy of each answer sheet Copies ofES-201-3 Examination Security Agreement forms Please contact me at (949) 368-3807 or (760) 504-9071 with any questions.

Respectfully,

,,//.zv~ 7L Willia Arbour Simulator Support / Exam Supervisor San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station r0 Bux 128

~al1 Clemente, CA 92672

2008 NRC Written Exam Analysis Common Question 6 This question was missed by 4 of 9 applicants.

Topic: Safety Injection and Containment Spray The question is technically accurate, as written. Applicants did not recall the con-ect answer.

Common Question 34 This question was missed by 3 of 9 applicants.

Topic: Containment Purge The question is technically accurate, as written. Applicants did not recall the correct answer.

Common Question 37 This question was missed by 5 of 9 applicants.

Topic: Condenser Air Removal The question is technically accurate, as written.

Common Question 46 This question was missed by 5 of 9 applicants.

Topic: Pressurizer Pressure Control Malfunction The question is technically accurate, as written.

2008 NRC Written Exam Analysis Common Question 60 This question was missed by 3 of 9 applicants.

Topic: Loss of Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation The question is technically accurate, as written Common Question 64 This question was missed by 3 of 9 applicants.

Topic: High Reactor Coolant Activity The question is technically accurate, as written.

Common Question 76 This question was missed by 3 of 3 applicants.

Topic: Inadequate Core Cooling The question is technically accurate, as written. Applicants confused inadequate core cooling with insufficient subcooling.

A notification has been written to include the analysis and the review of questions missed in the initial license training program. Not # 200161004