ML081830303
| ML081830303 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Seabrook, Turkey Point, Duane Arnold  |
| Issue date: | 07/01/2008 |
| From: | Justin Poole NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-1 |
| To: | Chernoff H NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLI-2 |
| Poole Justin/DORL/LPL3-1/ 301-415-2048 | |
| References | |
| TAC MD7637, TAC MD7638, TAC MD7645, TAC MD7646, TAC MD7651, TAC MD7662, TAC MD7663, TAC MD7697 | |
| Download: ML081830303 (5) | |
Text
July 1, 2008 MEMORANDUM TO: Harold K. Chernoff, Chief Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
Justin C. Poole, Project Manager /ra/
Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NO. MD7645, MD7646, MD7662, MD7663, MD7651, MD7697, MD7637, AND MD7638)
The attached draft request for information (RAI) was transmitted on June 27, 2008, to Mr. John Lafferty of Florida Power and Light (FPL). This information was transmitted to facilitate an upcoming conference call in order to clarify the licensee=s response to Security Bulletin 2007-01 Security Officer Attentiveness, dated February 11, 2008.
The draft questions were sent to ensure that the questions were understandable, the regulatory basis for the questions was clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed.
Additionally, review of the draft RAI would allow FPL to determine and agree upon a schedule to respond to the RAI. This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensees request.
Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389, 50-250, 50-251, 50-443, 50-331, 50-266, and 50-301
Enclosure:
Draft RAI
July 1, 2008 MEMORANDUM TO: Harold K. Chernoff, Chief Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
Justin C. Poole, Project Manager /ra/
Plant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NO. MD7645, MD7646, MD7662, MD7663, MD7651, MD7697, MD7637, AND MD7638)
The attached draft request for information (RAI) was transmitted on June 27, 2008, to Mr. John Lafferty of Florida Power and Light (FPL). This information was transmitted to facilitate an upcoming conference call in order to clarify the licensee=s response to Security Bulletin 2007-01 Security Officer Attentiveness, dated February 11, 2008.
The draft questions were sent to ensure that the questions were understandable, the regulatory basis for the questions was clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed.
Additionally, review of the draft RAI would allow FPL to determine and agree upon a schedule to respond to the RAI. This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensees request.
Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389, 50-250, 50-251, 50-443, 50-331, 50-266, and 50-301
Enclosure:
Draft RAI DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC RidsNrrDorlLpl1-2 LPL I-2 Reading JPoole, NRR RidsNrrDorlDpr ACCESSION NO.: ML081830303
- Per email dated June 30, 2008 OFFICE LPLIII-1/PM NSIR/DSO NAME JPoole GWest for RCorriea*
DATE 7/1/08 06/30/08 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REVIEW OF SECURITY BULLETIN RESPONSES SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO SECURITY BULLETIN 2007-01 FPL COMPANY, ST. LUCIE UNITS 1 AND 2, TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 AND 4 FPL ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC, SEABROOK STATION FPL ENERGY DUANE ARNOLD, LLC, DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER FPL ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC, POINT BEACH UNITS 1 AND 2 In responding to each of the following questions, licensee should provide information that addresses measures that are currently in place, and any additional planned actions with expected completion dates:
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff reviewed your response to Question 1a and requests the following additional information:
- 1. Describe the process for security post rotations including the rotation process for isolated positions.
Include the following information in your response:
A description of the security post rotation process including, but not limited to: (1) a discussion of the types of posts a typical security officer would rotate through during a normal shift; (2) a discussion on whether the type of activity (i.e. roving or foot patrol or stationary in a Bullet Resisting Enclosure [BRE]) performed at each individual post is taken into consideration when a security officer moves from post to post throughout the shift; and, (3) the length of time at each post. When responding, particular emphasis should be placed on whether the licensee takes into consideration the activities associated with each post assignment when formulating their post rotation schedules for each shift (i.e., rotating from foot patrol to BRE to Vital Area patrol or rotating from BRE to ready room to BRE etc.)
The NRC staff reviewed your response to Question 1b and requests the following additional information:
- 2. Describe any licensee processes or programs that are in place to identify problems in climate controlled security areas. What methods are used to track, inspect, and ensure timely repairs are completed?
Include the following information in your response:
A description of how the security areas are maintained including, but not limited to: (1) a discussion of the maintenance and/or preventive maintenance process and programs in place for these security areas including an overview and brief discussion on routine inspection schedules by maintenance personnel; (2) a discussion on the process a security officer can follow to report concerns with the upkeep and maintenance of his or her post; and, (3) a discussion on the timeliness of repairs and any follow-up actions taken by the licensee to ensure the repairs are completed and resolved adequately.
The NRC staff reviewed your response to Question 1 and requests the following additional information:
- 3. Are security personnel provided opportunities to participate in any personnel surveys regarding the work environment? If so, what is the frequency of the surveys, the average participation rate of security personnel as compared to the general site average, and the process for providing feedback and addressing the results from the survey?
- 4. How is the licensees policy regarding site employee attentiveness and/or inattentiveness communicated to personnel, both licensee and contractor, and at what frequency?
The NRC staff reviewed your response to Question 2 and requests the following additional information:
- 5. Describe the process for employees to file reports through the site corrective action program (CAP). Can employees file CAP reports without prior supervisory/management review or approval?
Include the following information in your response:
Describe the process for employees to file reports through the CAP. Discuss the supervisor/management review and/or approval process including, but not limited to: (1) does a supervisor/manager have the authority to reject a report before entering it into the corrective action program without additional management review and approval; and, (2) does a supervisor/manager have the authority to modify the report before such report has been entered into the CAP.
- 6. Can employees view the status and disposition of reports directly, or must this information be requested? If yes, please describe the process.
The NRC staff reviewed your response to Question 4 and requests the following additional information:
- 7. Are formal assessments of the security program conducted by organizations/individuals that do not have direct responsibility for the security program? If so, provide information on the process, including, but not limited to, the organizations and levels of management involved, the frequency of such activities, and any tracking of how findings are resolved.
The NRC staff reviewed your response to Question 5 and requests the following additional information:
- 8. How do you assess the effectiveness of your oversight of contractors and subcontractors?
Include the following information in your response:
Describe the licensees program for oversight of contractors and subcontractors including, but not limited to: (1) a brief overview and description of licensees procedures that describe the oversight process; (2) include a detailed list (bulleted is preferred) of assigned duties for the licensee supervisor(s) or manager(s) responsible for overseeing contractors and subcontractors at the site; (3) include a detailed list (bulleted is preferred) of the assigned duties for the contractor and subcontractor supervisor(s) or manager(s) responsible for overseeing the contractor and subcontractor staff at the site; and, (4) a brief discussion of the corporate (management) involvement with the oversight of contractors and subcontractors at the site.