ML081690586
| ML081690586 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 02/15/2008 |
| From: | Constellation Energy Group |
| To: | David Silk Operations Branch I |
| Shared Package | |
| ML073040307 | List:
|
| References | |
| TAC U01633 | |
| Download: ML081690586 (11) | |
Text
Calvert Cliffs SRO Exam 45-Day Draft Version ES 401-9 form 1
LOK (FIH: -
3 Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other Back-ward -
I BIWN I UIEIS Cred
- / unit Partia Stem Focus -
Uinuti SRO onl) -
X -
N Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y Y
Y B
hing to do with the LBLOBA EPE Resampled WA -
Which is correct C or D (as per answer explanation)7 K/A refers to alarms consistent with plant condition Q is about takiw action based won Dlant conditions Correct answer i stractors or the question appears to be too detail-oriented SRO only because of needing to know entry conditions???
Yes - i t is simple but it IS important - I think they should try again with a more challenging question D is a good X -
4 - not in catalog N -
2 -
c J
I u
n I -D
.?
A N
1 g
A w
rn 9
Ch v) e
v)
W 0 rn v) e 9
rh I
N X
1 Q
f m a 2
3 I:
!I ffl W 0 e
c" k?
9
'D $.
Y J
C 3
E d
IN I-
-4 m
m n
n 3
1 D
J z
z z
z Iz
/L z
zIz IC IC I
I m
rn cn e
s
B 2
2 2
1:
0 (D
m N
I n
I I
h) w X
X J
.J
.J
--H--tF X
X r )
J
+
D -
I-i -
z C
v) $ ?
=
IC m
0 T1 e 4 ;
Y k
Calved Cliffs 45-Day Verslon ES 401-9 form
- 1.
LOK F/H)
- 1. Job
- ontet Flaw Job-Link -
- 8. Explanation Partial -
linutii -
ooling seems to be a of action??? RO are expected to know this - provide reference that correlates a, c -
CCNP 45-day ES 401-9 form.xls Page 6
Calvert Cliffs 45-Day Version ES 401-9 form UIEIS
- 8. Explanation applicants know that a DBLOCA includes a LOOP? Do we question Positive MTC after core reload. Never move r to be clearly SRO A is not appropriate -
n - Justify/ document Page 7 CCNP 45day ES 401-9 form.xls
- )
Iw IN t
'F-m 0 (7
-I-2 P
3 C
t z
z z
I C
ffl $ ?
Calvert Cliffs 45-Day Version ES 401-9 form F
29 38.7%
H 46 61.3%
100.0%
- 8. Explanation NRC Exam 2002. D - Remove "lkely" - be more definitive.
Why is A plausible? Question just asks what equipment is located in what room - recommend replace - provided A
Y N
B E
distracter analysis - review carefully Capitalize "Operating. C 8 D mention specific instruments whereas A & B are generic. C 8 D can be readily eliminated.
Agree - not really testing "operator response" - rather X
N N
N U
design features - replace - Replaced/revised the question D - Be less graphic in stem (incapacitated vs killed. available vs left alive). Why is A plausible? Is this an appropriate RO A
?
Y N
N S
level question U
B Bank=
21%
16 E
M Modified=
23%
17 23 Enhancement required S
N New=
56%
42 28 SATISFACTORY 2
2 3
1 3
1 7
0 1
18 68 75 75 Sum 24 UNSAT 75 75 Total graded 32.0%
% UNSAT Page 9 CCNP 45day ES 401-9 form.xls
Calvert Cliffs Operating Exam Comments Generic Comments N/Aed non-applicable procedural steps that appeared in the JPMs.
Consistently identified cues.
Verify, Check, or Ensure steps are not critical 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> notification JPM was the same for RO/SRO - need to distinguish between RO/SRO RO Admin JPMs 2008-AOP7H - swapped with system JPM-2008-NIS: Calculate Tq using excore NIS 2008-RM - deleted from RO exam (not appropriate) and replaced with JPM-2008-TTB:
determine time to boil calculation 2008-RCP - clarified cues 2008-RAD - will provide applicants with specific tasks and then identify applicable RWP, PCs, dosimetry, contaminated areas, hot spots, and general area dose rates SRO Admin JPMs 2008-RM-SRO - applicants to complete reportability form and identify who is notified 2008-AP7H-SRO - used as system JPM; replaced with JPM-2008-NO-ll4-SRO: evaluate draining refueling pool with cont closure deviation 2008-MNT - Modified initiating cue to be less leading and added later cue for applicants to consider shutdown time 2008-RAD-SRO - clarified initial conditions and added details to JPM steps 2008-ERPIP - clarified critical steps and will provide details for completing notification form In-Plant Svstem JPMs 2008-CDEM - As written, not an alternate path JPM. Keep this JPM but made JPM-2008-41 60V made into alternate path JPM.
2008-SDC minor clarifications; 2008-PPCS - deleted unnecessary cues and clarified critical steps 2008-MFW - deleted unnecessary cues and clarified critical steps 2008-SDC deleted unnecessary cues and clarified critical steps, WA changed 2008-480V - not discriminatory as written; licensee replaced JPM-2008-41 6OVAC 2008-NIS - Moved to admin JPM section; replaced with JPM-2008-AOP7H 2008-CCW - clarify last JPM step to include operator actions vs recommendations; intial cued modified to distinguish between RO/SRO applicant (given vs find appropriate procedure) 2008-IA1 - Include cue cards to be provided in plant instead of verbal cues (noise factor) 2008-4KV - Replaced with JPM-2008-4KV-OC-DG because permission denied to open breaker panels 2008-MSIV - minor comments on cues
Scenarios General Comments Several malfunctions resulted in no operator action although they provided TS calls for SRO and / or set up the crew for the major transient. Malfunctions were added for board operators.
Requested that post-trip component malfunctions (Le., valves or pumps failing to automatically realign) be added to ensure adequate testing of applicants. All scenarios needed significant enhancements to D-2 s for expected operator actions. More details (valves, pumps, switches, plant parameters, etc.) will be provided by the licensee. Some designated critical tasks were not critical and therefore not designated as critical tasks.
Scenario 1 Renumber events. Licensee will add a component malfunction for the ATC operator.
Scenario 2 Renumber events.
Scenario 3 Renumber events. Licensee will add two component malfunctions for the ATC operator.
Scenario 4 (Backup)
Renumber events. Licensee will add a component malfunction for the ATC operator. One critical task was not critical.