ML081490471

Relief Request 08-MN-001

ML081490471
Person / Time
Site:	McGuire, Mcguire
Issue date:	05/16/2008
From:	Brandi Hamilton Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Corp
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
08-MN-001
Download: ML081490471 (86)

Text

PDuke aEnergy BRUCE H HAMILTON Vice President McGuire Nuclear Station Duke Energy Corporation MG01 VP / 12700 Hagers Ferry Road Huntersville, NC 28078 704-875-5333 704-875-4809 fax bhhamilton@duke-energy. com May 16, 2008 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

Subject:

Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke)

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 Relief Request 08-MN-001 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii), Duke requests relief from some requirements of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section X1, as described in the attached Relief Request 08-MN-001.

Please direct any questions pertaining to this submittal to P. T. Vu of Regulatory Compliance at (704) 875-4302.

Sincerely, B. H. Hamilton Attachments L-47 www. duke-energy, com

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission May 16, 2008 Page 2 xc w/attachments:

L. A. Reyes, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303 J. F. Stang, Jr., Senior Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Mail Stop 0-8 G9A Rockville, MD 20852-2738 J

J. B. Brady, Senior Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission McGuire Nuclear Station

Duke Energy Corporation McGuire Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 Page 2 of 12 1.0 Scope of Relief Request Relief is requested pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii) for welds listed in Table

1. These welds were required to be examined in accordance with Inservice Inspection Plans for the following Units.

McGuire Nuclear Station - Unit 1 Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval Interval Start Date: 12-01-2001 McGuire Nuclear Station - Unit 2 Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval Interval Start Date: 3-01-2004 Table 1 Relief McGuire Examination Weld ID Item/Summary Examination Data Request Unit Performed Number Number Section Number (Refueling, Number Outacqe) 2.0 1

1EOC18 1PZR-10 M1.B3.110.0001 See Attachment A 3.0 2

2EOC17 2RPV-W08 M2.B1.40.0001 See Attachment B 4.0 2

2EOC17 2PZR-10 M2.B3.110.0001 See Attachment C 5.0 2

2EOC17 2PZR-12 M2.B3.1110.0002 See Attachment D 6.0 2

2EOC17, 2PZR-16 M2.B3.110.0006 See Attachment E

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 Page 3 of 12 2.0 Weld #1PZR-10 2.1.

ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 1 Pressurizer nozzle to vessel weld, Weld #1PZR-10, Summary Number M1.B3.1 10.0001 2.2.

Applicable Code Edition and Addenda

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Xl, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 2.3.

Applicable Code Requirement

IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item B3.110 requires a volumetric examination of this weld in accordance with Figure IWB-2500-7. Footnote 4 of this table requires that the examination volumes shown in Figures IWB-2500-7(a) through (d), as applicable, shall be examined.

For this weld, Figure IWB-2500-7(b) applies, and 100% of the examination volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H is required to be examined.

Relief is requested from the requirement that 100% of the volume identified in Figure IWB-2500-7(b) shall be examined.

2.4.

Impracticality of Compliance This is a ferritic nozzle welded into a ferritic pressure vessel. This weld is required to be examined in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section V, Article 4, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda as amended by ASME Section XI, Appendix I. This requires that two ultrasonic angle beams pass through the weld in four orthogonal directions. Ultrasonic.

examination of the pressurizer surge nozzle to head weld was limited to 81.3% coverage because of the inability to examine the weld from four orthogonal directions. The percentage shown was calculated based on the requirement for four directional coverage (i.e., four directional coverage = 100%). Interference caused by the nozzle geometry and the location of the nozzle blend radius prevented placement of the search units on the nozzle side of the weld, preventing examination from that side. In order to achieve the required coverage, the nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow access from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. Radiography as an alternative to ultrasonic examination is also impractical because there is no access for placement of radiographic film on the I.D. of the vessel. Placing the film on the outside and exposing the source from the inside would also be impractical because of the lack of accessibility.

See Attachment A for examination data and volume examined.

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and2 Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 Page 4 of 12 2.5.

Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use None. No additional examinations are planned for this weld during the current interval because increased coverage cannot be obtained using available examination techniques.

2.6.

Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is proposed for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on November 30, 2011.

2.7.

Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination was performed in accordance with ASME Section V, Article 4, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda as amended by ASME Section XI, Appendix I to the extent practical. Examination personnel were qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, IWA-2300 including Appendix VII. The weld volume was scanned with 350 and 450 shear waves.

The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.

2.8.

Precedents Duke Energy Corporation Relief Request Serial #98-004 was approved by NRC Safety Evaluation Report, dated August 24, 1999 for use during the Second 10-Year Interval Inservice Inspection Plan. During the second interval, volumetric examination coverage of 74.78% Was obtained for this weld.

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 Page 5 of 12 3.0 Weld #2RPV-W08 3.1.

ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2 Reactor Vessel Head to Flange Weld #2RPV-W08, Summary Number M2.B1.40;0001 3.2.

Applicable Code Edition and Addenda

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Xl, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 3.3.

Applicable Code Requirement

IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-A, Item B1.40 requires a volumetric and surface examination of the weld in accordance with Figure IWB-2500-5. Footnote 2 of this table requires that the weld examination "includes essentially 100% of the weld length". The required examination surface and volume are shown in Figure IWB-2500-5.

Relief is requested from the requirement to perform volumetric examination on the volume identified in Figure IWB-2500-5 on essentially 100% of the weld length.

Note:

Relief from the requirement to perform a surface examination is not necessary for this weld because the surface examination requirement specified above was met.

3.4.

Impracticality of Compliance This is a ferritic flange welded onto a ferritic pressure vessel head. This weld is required to be examined in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section V, Article 4, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda as amended by ASME Section XI, Appendix I. This requires that two ultrasonic angle beams pass through the weld in four orthogonal directions. Ultrasonic examination of the flange to head weld was limited to 82.2% coverage because of the inability to examine the weld from four orthogonal directions. The percentage shown was calculated based on the requirement for four directional coverage (i.e., four directional coverage = 100%). Interference caused by the location of the flange blend radius and the proximity of lifting lugs prevented scanning from four directions. In order to achieve the required coverage, the nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow access from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. Radiography as an alternative to ultrasonic examination is also impractical because radiography will not provide meaningful results on a component of this thickness, and because the lifting lug and the flange blend radius would have prevented imaging all of the examination volume on the film.

See Attachment B for examination data and volume examined.

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 Page 6 of 12 3.5.

Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use None. No additional examinations are planned for this weld during the current interval because increased coverage cannot be obtained using available examination techniques.

3.6.

Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is proposed for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on February 28, 2014.

3.7.

Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination. was performed in accordance with ASME Section V, Article 4, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda as amended by ASME Section XI, Appendix I to the extent practical.

Examination personnel were qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, IWA-2300 including Appendix VII. The weld Volume was scanned with 350 and 450 shear waves.

The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.

3.8.

Precedents Duke Energy Corporation Relief Request Serial #98-005 was approved by NRC Safety Evaluation Report, dated November 9, 2000 for use during the Second 10-Year Interval Inservice Inspection Plan. During the second interval, volumetric examination coverage of 87.78% was obtained.

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 Page 7 of 12 4.0 Weld #2PZR-10 4.1.

ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2 Pressurizer Nozzle to Head Weld #2PZR-10, Summary Number M2.B3.1 10.0001 4.2.

Applicable Code Edition and Addenda

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 4.3.

Applicable Code Requirement

IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item B3.110 requires a volumetric examination of the weld in accordance with Figure IWB-2500-7. Footnote 4 of this table requires that the examination volumes shown in Figures IWB-2500-7(a) through (d), as applicable, shall be examined.

For this weld, Figure IWB-2500-7(b) applies, and 100% of the examination volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H is required to be examined.

Relief is requested from the above requirement that 100% of the volume identified in Figure IWB-2500-7(b) shall be examined.

4.4.

Impracticality of Compliance This is a ferritic nozzle welded into a ferritic pressure vessel. This weld is required to be examined in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section V, Article 4, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda as amended by ASME Section XI, Appendix I. This requires that two ultrasonic angle beams pass through the weld in four orthogonal directions. Ultrasonic examination of the pressurizer surge nozzle to head weld was limited to 81.2% coverage because of the inability to examine the weld from four orthogonal directions. The percentage shown was calculated based on.

the requirement for four directional coverage (i.e., four directional coverage = 100%). Interference caused by the nozzle geometry and the location of the nozzle blend radius prevented placement of the search units on the nozzle side of the weld, preventing examination from that side. In order to achieve the required coverage, the nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow access from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. Radiography as an alternative to ultrasonic examination is also impractical because there is no access for placement of radiographic film on the I.D. of the vessel. Placing the film on the outside and exposing the source from the inside would also be impractical because of the lack of accessibility.

See Attachment C for examination data and volume examined.

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 Page 8 of 12 4.5.

Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use None. No additional examinations are planned for this weld during the current interval because increased coverage cannot be obtained using available examination techniques.

4.6.

Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is proposed for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on February 28, 2014:

4.7.

Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination was performed in accordance with ASME Section V, Article 4, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda as amended by ASME Section XI, Appendix I to the extent practical. Examination personnel were qualified in accordance with ASME Section Xl, IWA-2300, including Appendix VII. The weld volume was scanned with 350 and 450 shear waves.

The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.

4.8.

Precedents Duke Energy Corporation Relief Request Serial #98-005 was approved by NRC Safety Evaluation Report, dated November 9, 2000 for use during the Second 10-Year Interval Inservice Inspection Plan. During the second interval, volumetric examination coverage of 74.78% was obtained.

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 Page 9 of 12 5.0 Weld #2PZR-12 5.1.

ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2 Pressurizer Nozzle to Head Weld #2PZR-12, Summary Number M2.B3.110.0002 5.2.

Applicable Code Edition and Addenda

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 5.3.

Applicable Code Requirement

IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item B3.110 requires a volumetric examination of the weld in accordance with Figure IWB-2500-7. Footnote 4 of this table requires that the examination volumes shown in Figures IWB-2500-7(a) through (d), as applicable, shall be examined.

For this weld, Figure IWB-2500-7(b) applies, and 100% of the examination volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H is required to be examined.

Relief is requested from the above requirement that 100% of the volume identified in Figure IWB-2500-7(b) shall be examined.

5.4.

Impracticality of Compliance This is a ferritic nozzle welded into a ferritic pressure vessel. This weld is required to be examined in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section V, Article 4, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda as amended by ASME Section XI, Appendix I. This requires that two ultrasonic angle beams pass through the weld in four orthogonal directions. Ultrasonic examination of the pressurizer spray nozzle to head weld was limited to 81.7% coverage because of the inability to examine the weld from four orthogonal directions. The percentage shown was calculated based on the requirement for four directional coverage (i.e., four directional coverage = 100%). Interference caused by the nozzle geometry and the location of the nozzle blend radius prevented placement of the search units on the nozzle side of the weld, preventing examination from that side. In order to achieve the required coverage, the nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow access from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. Radiography as an alternative to ultrasonic examination is also impractical because placement of radiographic film on the I.D. of the vessel would result in significant personnel exposure as well as fogging of the film. Placing the film on the outside and exposing the source from the inside would also be impractical because the attachment to the spray nozzle would interfere with the alignment of the source and the film.

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 Page 10 of 12 See Attachment D for examination data and volume examined.

5.5.

Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use None. No additional examinations are planned for this weld during the current interval because increased coverage cannot be obtained using available examination techniques.

5.6.

Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is proposed for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on February 28, 2014.

5.7.

Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination was performed in accordance with ASME Section V, Article 4, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda as amended by ASME Section XI, Appendix I to the extent practical. Examination personnel were qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, IWA-2300 including Appendix VII. The weld volume was scanned with 350 and 450 shear waves.

The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.

5.8.

Precedents Duke Energy Corporation Relief Request Serial #98-005 was approved by NRC Safety Evaluation Report, dated November 9, 2000 for use during the Second 10-Year Interval Inservice Inspection Plan. During the second interval, volumetric examination coverage of 71.50% was obtained.

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 Page 11 of 12 6.0 Weld #2PZR-16 6.1.

ASME Code Component(s) Affected Unit 2 Pressurizer Nozzle to Head Weld #2PZR-16, Summary Number M2.B3.1 10.0006 6.2.

Applicable Code Edition and Addenda

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda 6.3.

Applicable Code Requirement

IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item B3.110 requires a volumetric examination of the weld in accordance with Figure IWB-2500-7. Footnote 4 of this table requires that the examination volumes shown in Figures IWB-2500-7(a) through (d), as applicable, shall be examined.

For this weld, Figure IWB-2500-7(b) applies, and 100% of the examination volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H is required to be examined.

Relief is requested from the above requirement that 100% of the volume identified in Figure IWB-2500-7(b) shall be examined.

6.4.

Impracticality of Compliance This is a ferritic nozzle welded into a ferritic pressure vessel. This weld is required to be examined in accordance with the requirements of ASME Section V, Article 4, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda as amended by ASME Section XI, Appendix I. This requires that two ultrasonic angle beams pass through the weld in four orthogonal directions. Ultrasonic examination of the pressurizer spray nozzle to head weld was limited to 81.2% coverage because of the inability to examine the weld from four orthogonal directions. The percentage shown was calculated based on the requirement for four directional coverage (i.e., four directional coverage = 100%). Interference caused by the nozzle geometry and the location of the nozzle blend radius prevented placement of the search units on the nozzle side of the weld, preventing examination from that side. In order to achieve the required coverage, the nozzle would have to be redesigned to allow access from both sides of the weld, which is impractical. Radiography as an alternative to ultrasonic examination is also impractical because placement of radiographic film on the I.D. of the vessel would result in significant personnel exposure as well as fogging of the film. Placing the film on the outside and exposing the source from the inside would also be impractical because the attachment to the spray nozzle and the distance from the manway would interfere with the alignment of the source and the film.

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 Page 12 of 12 See Attachment E for examination data and volume examined.

6.5.

Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use None. No additional examinations are planned for this weld during the current interval because increased coverage cannot be obtained using available examination techniques.

6.6.

Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is proposed for the duration of the third inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on February 28, 2014.

6.7.

Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination was performed in accordance with ASME Section V, Article 4, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda as amended by ASME Section XI, Appendix I to the extent practical. Examination personnel were qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, IWA-2300 including Appendix VII. The weld volume was scanned with 350 and 450 shear waves.

The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.

6.8.

Precedents Duke Energy Corporation Relief Request Serial #99-001 was approved by NRC Safety Evaluation Report, dated November 9, 2000 for use during the Second 10-Year Interval Inservice Inspection Plan. During the second

,interval, volumetric examination coverage of 62.70% was obtained.

Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 ATTACHMENT A McGuire Unit 1 Examination Data for Weld #1PZR-10, Summary #M1.B3.110.0001

Site/Unit: McGuire I 1 Summary No.:

Mi.B3.110.0001 UT Vessel E^dmination Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

NDE-640 3

Outage No.:

MI-l8 Report No.:

UT-07-007 Workscope:

ISl Work Order No.:

1698799 Page:

1 of I

Code:

199812000 Addenda Cat./Item:

B-DIB3.1 10 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 1201.01-170

==

Description:==

Nozzle to Head System ID:

NC Component ID: 1PZR-10 Size/Length:

NIA Thickness/Diameter: 2.5501 24.500 Limitations:

Yes - See Attached Limitation Report (To Report # UT.07.006)

)

Start Time:

1158 Finish Time:

1210 Examination Surface:

Inside r-

Out, Lo Location:

9.2.3 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

FISHER Cal. Report No.:

Angle Used 0

45 45T 60 Scanning dB 39.5 Indication(s):

Yes:,

No Comments:

FC 06-04 side Wo Location:

Serial No.:

Surface Condition: FLUSH Centerline of FyhW Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II ap.:

74

°F Batch No.:

06125 MCNDE 27220 CAL-07.017 Surface Tei 60T Scan Coverage:

Upstream.,!ý,

Downstreamnv

,. CW iV CCW

• Results:

Accept,%ý;

Reject Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

Info

Site/Unit: McGuire /

Summary No.:

MI.E Workscope:

UT Vessel Examination 1

13.110.0001 ISI Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-820 2

1698799 Outage No.:

M1-18 Report No.:

UT-07-006 Page:

1 of 10 Code:

1998/2000 Addenda CatJlItem:

B-D/3.110 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 1201.01-170

==

Description:==

Nozzle to Head System ID:

NC Component ID: IPZR-10 Size/Length:

N/A Thickness/Diameter: 2.550/24.500 Limitations:

Yes - See Attached Limitation Report Start Time:

1210 Finish Time:

1321 Examination Surface:

Inside []

Outside R Surface Condition: FLUSH Lo Location:

9.2.3 Wo Location:

Centerline of FywhW Coupant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

06125 Temp. Tool MNg.:

FISHER Serial No.:

MCNDE 27220 Surface Temp.:

74 OF Cal. Report No.:

CAL-07-018, CAL-07-0191 CAL-07-020 Angle Used 0

45 45T 60 60T 35 Scanning dB 68.2 68.2 71.2 63.7 Indication(s):

Yes E]

No []

Scan Coverage:

Upstream [

Downstream []

CW 9 CCW R]

Comments:

Additional Inspector working on 350 inspection was Ken Ellis Results:

Accept Sa Reject D]

Info El Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

No 01.2 % 1./1 Revieyved Previous Data:

Yes Examiner Level IIl-N y

S ignature Date Reviewer Signature Date Jones, Russel E.

3/15/2007 Jay A Eaton Level III 3/22J2007 Examiner Level II-N la, Signature Date Site Review Signature Date Hatchett, Jay M.

3/15/2007 N/A 3/15M2007 Other Level pI Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date Houser, Gayle E.

3/15/2007 Jerome Swan......

0r7 IV.

U I- /

Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head % of Coverage Item No. : M N

• I. 1Z. OOc I Weld No.:

17FEZ-10 Weld Coverage Scan SI S2 S1 S2 Cw Cw

CCw, CCw Angle 350 350 450 450 350 450 350 450

% Coverage Obtained 100 72.9 95.5 55.3 100 i00 100 100 723.7 Total 723.7 + 8 =

90.5

% Coverage Base Material Coverage S1 & S2 Cw & CCw 350,45-&60° 450&350 Total 87.9 65.9 153.8 76.9 76.6 153.8 ÷ 2 =

% Coverage

% Coverage 00 Scan Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00 - 3 81.3

% Coverage Inspector / Date :

NI

.1 I

,*us,

C r-6-o7 d a F/440 j

Page Z of 1_

Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head Limitations I

Item N6.: MIk.

63.- I 10.

DO\\I Weld No.:

\\ P'-;__---

10 The 350 and 450 scans are limited at 20 Heater Wells on the Surface I side. The limitation is 2" at each well for a total of 40". The total weld length is 76". See attached drawings.

% of Weld limited at Heater Wells = 40 / 76 x 100 = 52.6%.

Base Metal coverage from Surface I At Heaier Wells

= 85.3% coverage for 52.6% of the weld length = 44.9%

Remainder of weld = 90.8% coverage for 47.4% of the weld length = 43.0%

Total Coverage

= 87.9%

Weld coverage from Surface 1 At Heater Wells

= 91.4% coverage for 52.6% of the weld length = 48.1%

Remairider of weld = 100% coverage for 47.4% of the weld length = 47.4%

Total Coverage

= 95.5%

Inspector / Date:

Page 331 of 7

(T 1 8#j

.,-6-0-o Page 3 of l

L ý

Pressurizer Surge N\\,ozzle to Head Total Area Weld & Base Material Total Weld Area = 5.35 sq. in.

Total Area of Base Material = 6.71 + 6.95 = 13.66 sq. in.

Total ExamArea = 6.71 + 5.35 + 6.95 = 19.01 sq. in.

ItemNo.:

m i.-i5.Uo.110-oo Weld No.,:

I 1-_

Scale 1" = 2" Clad Inspector / Date:

Page L4 of 1__IM 67

Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head 00 Scan Coverage 00 Scan Total Area = 14.57 sq. in.

Item No. : w \\. &. ilo. ooo I Weld No.:

Scale 1" = 2" Total 00 Scan Coverage = 14.57 / 19.01 x 100 = 76.6 %

Clad Inspector / Date:

Page S of _*

IS T-310-7 RI~A.k

~.7

Pressurizer Surge INozzle to Head Base Metal Coverage -Axial (Areas not at Heater Wells)

ItemNo.:

V__

.__._0_____

Weld No.:

I P-lZ-o Total Coverage with 2 angles from the same direction Scale 1" = 2"

= (6.71 + 5.69) / 13.66 x 100 = 90.8%

Surface 2 Nozzle 600 Surface 1 - Head Clad Inspector / Date :

Page,

of io R-iw-c

Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head Base Metal Coverage - Circumferential Total Coverage with 350 and 450 CW and CCW

= (6.71 + 2.30) / 13.66 x 100 = 65.9%

ItemNo.: A\\.153A1o.0oo 1

Weld No.:

x ?.7-

-0 0 Scale 1" = 2" Surface 2 Nozzle 450 and 350 Surface 1 -Head Area - 2.30 sq. in.

Clad Inspector / Date :

Page j of jo

-VAwk

e. 1 4ýtl

Pressurizer Surme i.,ozzle to Head Base Metal Coverage -Axial @ Heater Wells Total Coverage with 2 angles from the same direction or 1 angle from Item No.:

ix

. *\\ o. ogc*

opposite directions = (5.96 + 5.69) 13.66 x 100 =85.3%

Weld No.:

I'P-

- \\ o Scale 1" = 2" Heater Well Surface 2 Nozzle I

600 Surface I - Head 450 450 350 Clad 350 Inspector / Date:

Page

• of io o4,

• JZ I-o7

Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head Weld Coverage from Surface I -Axial 100% Coverage 35' Axial scan from Surface I 100% Coverage 450 Axial scan from Surface 1 except at Heater Well Limitation Weld Coverage 45' Axial scan from Surface 1

@ Heater Well = 4.89 / 5.35 x 100 = 91.4 %

ItemNo.:

mi.

_o.oo_

Weld No. :

\\

- 1-0I' Scale 1" = 2" Heater Well Surface-2 Nozzle 450 350 i =4.89 sq. in. - 450 Surface 1-Head Clad Inspector / Date:

r* 31t1°1 Page _ of

,O

a. 19167

Pressurizer Sury e Ndozzle to Head Weld Coverage from Surface 2 -Axial & Circ. Scans 100% Coverage 350 &45' Scans CW, CCW Item No. : mt ?.)*5. Ito -ooo I Total Weld Coverage 350 from Surface 2 = 3.90 / 5.35 x 100 = 72.9 %

Total Weld Coverage 450 from Surface 2 = 2.96 / 5.35 x 100 = 55.3 %

Weld No. :

I Fqi2-1o Scale 1" = 2" 350 450 Surface 2 Nozzle Area = 2.96 sq. in. -

Surface i - Head

.350 Clad Inspector / Date:

Page _o of to

Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 ATTACHMENT B McGuire Unit 2 Examination Data for Weld #2RPV-W08, Summary #M2.B1.40.0001

UT Vessel E.%amination Site/Unit: McGuire I Summary No.:

M2.E Workscope:

2 31.40.0001 Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-640 3

Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-362 Page:

1 of 1

ISl 580233 Code:

1998/2000 A Cat./Item:

B-A1B13.40 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01-01

==

Description:==

Head to Flange System ID:

NC Component ID: 2RPV-W08 Size/Length:

NIA Thickness/Diameter:

6.900 / 0.000 Limitations:

See Limitation Calculations attached to Report No. UT-06-363 Start Time:

0012 Finish Time:

0050 Examination Surface:

Inside Outside ;..

Surface Condition: GROUND FLUSH Lo Location:

9.2.1 Wo Location:

Centerline of Weld Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

06125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

D.A.S Serial No.:

MCNDE32819 Surface Temp.:

72 OF Cal. Report No.:

CAL-06-376 Angle Used 0

45 45T 601606T Scanning dB 36.2 Indication(s):

Yes,."'

No v; Scan Coverage:

Upstream ;v Downstream i

CW V1 CCW V Comments:

FC 06-04 Results:

Accept i i Reject Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

Z ;. t/.

Reviewed Previous Data:

Yes Examiner Level Il-N i

t Date Reviewer Si nature Date Day, John, C.

K X

g er

. 10/5/2006 Jay A Eaton Level III 101512006 Examiner Level N/A gnat/re Date Site Review Signature Date NIA N/A Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review

)

Signature Date NA Jerome Swan I

I Of 4-

UT Vessel E,,amination Site/Unit: McGuire /

Summary No.:

M2.l Workscope:

2 31.40.0001 ISI Procedure:

Procedure Rev::

Work Order No.:

NDE-820 2

580233 Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-363 Page:

1 of 5

Code:

199812000 A Cat./item:

B-AIB1.40 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01-01

==

Description:==

Head to Flange System ID:

NC Component 1D: 2RPV-W08 Size/Length:

NIA Thickness/Diameter:

6.900 10.000 Limitations:

See Attached Limitation Calculations Start Time:

2250 Finish Time:

0010 Examination Surface:

Inside Outside *Vý Surface Condition: GROUND FLUSH Lo Location:

9.2.1 Wo Location:

Centerline of Weld Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

06125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

D.A.S Serial No.:

MCNDE32819 Surface Temp.:

72

°F Cal. Report No.:

CAL-06-377, CAL-06-378 Angle Used 0

45 45T 60 60T 35/35T Scanning dB 65.0 65.0 57.1 Indication(s):

Yes !-

No 4.;

Scan Coverage:

Upstream V:

Downstream,'

CW.*'

CCW,v Comments:

Results:

Accept 4!'

Reject Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

&Z. 7-, 0 Reviewed Previous Data:

Yes Examiner Level III-N Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Stauffer, Lester, E.

zt' 4$,.

10/4/2006 Jay A Eaton Level 1l1 10/5/2006 Examiner Level Il-N S'

ajg~ture Date Site Review Signature Date Griebel, David M.

10/4/2006 NIA'/

Other Level II-N Signature Date ANII Review

/

Signature Date Tucker, David K.

10/4/2006 Jerome Swanr

/-

./*?/i Tucker DaidK I./

i

Krau OiCSYmer ULTRASONIC SYSTEMS Gain Range MtI. Velocity Frequency Disp Delay Probe Delay Pulser Energy Damping Reject Rectification PRF Value Ascan Mode Dual Mode DAC I TCG Frz Mode 42.0 dB 1.971 INCH 0.6271 INCH/us 2.25 MHZ 0.0000 us 73.9441 us High 1k OHM 0%

RF 940 Hz Hollow OFF OFF All Ranqe

• 1.971 INCH "robe Angle

.rig X-Value Trig Outer Diameter Trig Thick 35.0 0.000 INCH Flat 25.000 INCH Gate A Start Gate A Width Gate A Thresh 50.000 5.000 INCH INCH 13%

Reading 1 SB/!

0.950 INCH Reading 2 DA/I 0.111 INCH Reading 3 A%AI 2 %

Reading 4 A%A I 2 %

Gate B Start 0.050 INCH Gate B Width 10.000 INCH Gate B Thresh 39 %

Gate IF Start N/A Gate IF Width N/A Gate IF Thresh N/A PC File Name Creation Date Modification Date Instrument ID Instr. Serial Num HEAD2FLG-35B 09/25/2006 15:12:30 09/25/2006 15:12:30 USN60 00011MBT Operator:

Li4P.Cr-L.--

Test Comments:

ISroa-VLC-A vAv, Code:

ML

?1L*",_.

94.

01 Probe SIN:

Do______

Cal. Block S/N:

0,,'7 Lo Signature: -.

Lrau NiSramer ULTRASONIC SYSTEMS 9AL~~-L

'~

KrautisraS N er ULTRASONIC SYSTEMS Gain Range Mtl. Velocity Frequency Disp Delay Probe Delay Pulser Energy Damping Reject Rectification PRF Value Ascan Mode Dual Mode DAC / TCG Frz Mode 41.5 dB 1.971 INCH 0.6271 INCH/us 2.25 MHZ 0.0000 us 72.5359 us High 1k OHM 0%

RF 945 Hz Hollow OFF OFF All Ranae 1.971 INCH I.

"Irobe Angle

.rig X-Value Trig Outer Diameter Trig Thick 35.0 0.000 INCH Flat 25.000 INCH Gate A Start Gate A Width Gate A Thresh 50.000 INCH 5.000 INCH 13%

Reading 1 SB/I 0.987 INCH Reading 2 DA/

0.000 INCH Reading 3 A%A I 2 %

Reading 4 A%A I 2 %

Gate B Start 0.050 INCH Gate B Width 10.000 INCH Gate B Thresh 39 %

Gate IF Start N/A Gate IF Width N/A Gate IF Thresh N/A PC File Name Creation Date Modification Date Instrument ID Instr. Serial Num HEAD2FLG35A 10/05/2006 00:32:33 10/05/2006 00:32:33 USN60 00011 MBT Operator:

Z-Test Comments:

A6i

.t- -WV-tA vM Code:

.15.o.ooo 4.000 Probe SiN:

L-Y1L1Z, L_ -L__

Cal. Block SIN:

'503") P Signature:

Lrau OISramer ULTRASONIC SYST/EMS o-r-ot,.3(,3 7AkEC

-309'

KrautISramer ULTRASONIC SYSTEMS a

a a

a I

a a

a a

I a

I a

a I

I a

a a

I I

I a

I I

a I

I a

.1 I

I I

I a

I a

I I

I I

I S

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I a

I I

I I

I I

I I

a I

I I

I ftN I

I I

I I.

I Gain Range Mtl. Velocity Frequency Disp Delay Probe Delay Pulser Energy Damping Reject Rectification PRF Value Ascan Mode Dual Mode DAC I TCG Frz Mode 50.2 dB 3.000 INCH' 0.6296 INCH/us 2.25 MHZ 0.0000 us 88.8734 us High 1k OHM 0%

RF 925 Hz Hollow OFF OFF All A

a a

a I

I II-a a

a a

a a

I I

a a

a a

I I

I a

a a

I I

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a

Ranae 3.000 INCH

'robe Angle

. rig X-Value Trig Outer Diameter Trig Thick 35.0 0.000 INCH Flat.

10.000 INCH Gate A Start Gate A Width Gate A Thresh 50.000 INCH 5.000 INCH 13%

Reading 1 SB/I 4.144 INCH Reading 2 PB!I 2.377 INCH Reading 3 A%B I 1 %

Reading 4 DB/I 3.394 INCH Gate B Start 3.938 INCH Gate B Width 0.500 INCH Gate B Thresh 23 %

Gate IF Start N/A Gate IF Width N/A Gate IF Thresh N/A PC File Name Creation Date Modification Date Instrument ID Instr. Serial Num HEAD2FLG-45B 09/25/2006 16:39:58 09/25/2006 16:39:58 USN60 OOOOTJXY Operator:

L,3,zV

, I-V LCEC_.-(

Test Comments:

1ýg+o.-'r C,4A^

Code:

VVZ. Z,%. CO.ooo 0.0001 Probe SIN:

I:--

T_"1 8__

Cal. Block SIN:

Signature:

(z/L L6*,? _6i KrautRiSramer ULTRASONIC SYSTEMS V.C oT5

KrautiSramer ULTRASONIC SYSTEMS a

a a

a a

a a

I a

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a

I I

I a

a a~

a a

-i a

a h

a a

a a

II a

I a

a 1a a

a II a

a a

a a

I a

a a

a a __

Gain Range Mtl. Velocity Frequency Disp Delay Probe Delay Pulser Energy Damping Reject Rectification PRF Value Ascan Mode Dual Mode DAC I TCG Frz Mode 49.5 dB 3.000 INCH 0.6296 INCH/us 2.25 MHZ 0.0000 us 89.9428 us High lk OHM 0%

RF 925 Hz Hollow OFF OFF All III a

a II a

a IL a

I 1j~

a a

a a

a air a

a a

a a

a a

a a

a

(

a a

a a

a l a

a II a a

a a

a a

a a

a.

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a -

a a

a a

a a

- C -

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a

a a

S a

a a

a a

a a

Ranqe 3.000 INCH "robe Angle

.rig X-Value Trig Outer Diameter Trig Thick 35.0 0.000 INCH Flat 10.000 INCH Gate A Start Gate A Width Gate A Thresh 50.000 INCH 5.000 INCH 13%

Reading 1 SB/I 0.000 INCH Reading 2 PB/

0.000 INCH Reading 3 A%B 1 %

Reading 4 DB/

0.000 INCH Gate B Start.

3.938 INCH Gate B Width 0.500 INCH Gate B Thresh 23%

Gate IF Start N/A Gate IF Width N/A Gate IF Thresh N/A PC File Name Creation Date Modification Date Instrument ID Instr. Serial Num HEAD2FLG45A 10/05/2006 01:43:13 10/05/2006 01:43:13 USN60 0000TJXY Operator:

s -;42 t..-I'g...

Test Comments:

i t

L t-)L..','

Code:

"-L.

t.3 qo.

o

• 00 Probe S/N:

5:zz\\

_I_

(4 Cal. Block SIN:

Signature:

AI KrautISramer ULTRASONIC SYSTEMS

?AtxE 6,,-

-)

DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID:

2RPV-W08 Item No:

M2.BI.40.0001 remarks:

Z NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION L! LIMITED SCAN 0

1 I-1 2 I

1 Z 2 2 cw Ccw LiftingLug@00 FROM L 539" to L 3.0" INCHES FROM WO

+ 1.5" to Beyond ANGLE:

0 0

• 45 nI 60 other 35 FROM DEG to DEG I

NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Lifting Lug @ 1200 ILIMITED SCAN z

1 I2 i

[D cw Z ccw FROM L 177" to L 183.6" INCHES FROM WO

+ 1.5" to Beyond ANGLE:

tg 0 [] 45 I1 60 other 35 FROM DEG to DEG

[

NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Lifting Lug @ 240'

[-

LIMITED SCAN

[l 1 rl 2 I i I

2 ew ww FROM L 358.3" to L 364.3" INCHES FROM WO + 1.5" to Beyond ANGLE:

[D 0 Z 45 LI 60 other 35 FROM DEG to DEG Z*

NO SCAN LI LIMITED SCAN SURFACE 1-2 BEAM DIRECTION RPV Flange i' 1 r

2 0 cw Z ccw FROM L

____toL__o ANGLE:

D 0 45 60n

-j5 INCHES FROM WO

+ 3.0" to Beyond FROM o

DEG to 36o DEG Sketch(s) attached E* yes ENo A~e~

-rD

RPV Flange to Head Aggregate % Coverage Item No.: M2.B 1.40.0001 Weld No.: 2RPV-W08 Total Weld Length = 542" Limitation due to Lifting Lug = 6" x 3 Lugs = 18" total limitation.

% of weld length limited due to Lugs = 18/ 542 x 100 = 3.3%.

Weld Coverage at Lugs= 47.1% coverage x 3.3% of the weld length

= 1.6%.

Remainder of Coverage = 83.4% coverage x 96.7% of the weld length = 80.6%

Total Aggregate Coverage = 82.2%

Inspector/Date:

-IT[ I ItJL'(0 Page 7-of l(4 4,r-oAww-'.wrn

-ro r-cn,-3(,3

RPV Flange to Head % of Coverage Item No. : M2.B1.40.0001 Weld No. : 2RPV-W08 Weld Coverage Scan Si S2 Si S2 Cw Cw CCw CCw Angle 350 350 450 450 350 450 350 450

% Coverage Obtained 100 64.5 100 40.5 100 100 100 100 705 Total 705

- 8 =

88.1

% Coverage Base Material Coverage S1 &S2 Cw & CCw 350,450&600 45°&350 Total 96.9 73.3 170.2 85.1 76.9 170.2 - 2 =

% Coverage

% Coverage 00 Scan Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00 - 3 83.4 (2

it-

% Coverage Page 3 of ILA1 Inspector / Date :

RPV Flange to Head % of Coverage @ Lifting Lugs Item No. : M2.B1.40.0001 Weld No. : 2RPV-W08 Weld Coverage Scan Si S2 S1 S2 Cw Cw CCw CCw Angle 350 350 450 450 350 450 350 450

% Coverage Obtained 24.4 64.5 15.23 40.4 100 100 100 100 544.53 Total 544.53 + 8 =

68.1

% Coverage Base Material Coverage S1 &S2 Cw & CCw 350,450&600 450&350 Total 38.5 29.6 68.1 34.05 39.3 68.1 +2=

% Coverage

% Coverage 0' Scan Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00 - 3 47.1

% Coverage Page A of Iq Inspector / Date :

Al-MOAme:k-n- 0 0-r-Ot.-3('5

Item No." kI.B 1.40.0001 RPV Head to Flange Weld No.: 2RPV-W08 Total Exam Area Scale: 1" 5" S

Base Metal Exam Area = 25.06 + 25.71 50.77 sq. in.

Weld EBani Area =7.55 sq. in.

T*dal Exam Area = 58.32 sq, in./

7.55 sq. in.

CIif Inspector / Date:

page

_ of__'L

Lem No.: M2.B1.40.0001 RPV Head to Mange Veld No.: 2RPV-W08 Coverage - 0 Degree

'Scale V1 5" Total Coverage with 0 Degree Angle

=44.82 / 58.32 x 100 = 76.9%

/

Inspector I 0O Page (c of 1__

Item No. M2.B 1.40.0001 Weld No.: 2RPV-W08 Scale: 1" 5" STotal Coverag

= 22.93 / 58.32 RPV Hed6-FlI

)e Coverage- 0 Degree @ Lifting Lug ewith 0 Degree Angle x 100 =39.3%

e 00 e

06 Surface 1 Lnspectoi Surface 2 -Flange r/Date:

t lw[o--

Page 7 of Iq A-m~c,ýAm&7-k

-rus T!',n-3

Item No.. M2.B1.40. 0001 Weld No. : 2RPV-W08 Scale: 1" = 5" RPVHg-ad-Wtf-Fl ge--

Weld Coverage -Axial Scans Surface 1 Total Weld coverage from Surface I = 100%

Total Weld coverage from Surface 2 35 Degree =4.87 / 7.55 x 100 = 64.5%

45 Degree = 3.05 / 7.55 x 100 = 40.4%

450 = 3.05 sq. in.

35-4.87 sq. in.

itC Inspector / Date:

Page 2 of N___

Item No.. M2.B1.40.0001 Weld No.: 2RPV-W08 Scale: 1"= 5" Total Weld coverage from Surface 2 35 Degree 1.84 / 7.55 x 100 = 24.4 45 Degree= 1.15/7.55 x 100-= 15.2' RPVHeadtoFL e

Weld Coverage -Axial Scans from Surface I @ Lifting Lug Surface 1 N

450 = 1.15 sq. in.

350= 1.84 sq. in.

Inspector / Date Pagei_ of mq 4-jL,.x,**rAMI" O.-t01 -3('--Sa,,

Item No.. N2.B 1.40.0001 Weld No.: 2RPV-W08 fr Scale : 1" 5" ETotal Weld coverage from Surface 2 35 Degree = 4.87 / 7.55 x 100 = 64.5%

45 Degree = 3.05 / 7.55 x 100 = 40.4%

RPV H

-t-FLh -.e Veld Coverage -Axial Scans om Surface 2 @ Lifting Lug Surface 1 450 = 3.05 sq. in.

356 4.87 sq. in.

Inspector /Date:______________

Page irt of H-i a&1 t9Xr-Xi"

-MV 0-r-- o.- 3 ;

Item No.. M2.B1.40.0001 Weld No.: 2RPV-W08 Scale: 1" = 5" E

Total Base Metal Coverage (12.15 + 25.06) / 50.77 x STotal Weld Coverage Circ.

RPV Head toiFh de Weld and Base Metal Coverage -Circ. Scans Circ. Scans with 35 & 45 Degree Angles 100=73.3%

Scans with 35 & 45 Degree Angles = 100%

'IM 350 & 450 Surface 1 ect-or/Date:

t' i l.

Page io_

Surface 2 -Flange

-V

Item No.. M2.B1.40.0001 Weld No.: 2RPV-WO8 Scale: "= 5"

~

Total Base Metal Coverag with 35 and 45 Degree Ar

= (12.01 + 3.00)/ 50.77 x Z" Total Weld Coverage Circ.

with 35 and 45 Degree An RPV Head to-Fit, Weld and Base Metal Coverage @ Lifting.

35 and 45 degree angle Circ. scans

,e Circ. Scans Lges 100 = 29.6%

Scans gles 100%

300 sq. in.

~35o

& 450 Surface 1 Inspector/ Date:- onCls ri-zi -i~aw Page JLof 14 Ai'rfcA4Ae3 j--o1 5

D Surface 2 - Flang I ý

- AV

RPV1-e-V ftU 4

F e

Item No.. M2.B 1.40.0001 Weld No.: 1RPV-W08 Scale: 1" 5" Base Metal Coverage - Axial Scans Surface 1 Total Base Metal coverage with two angles from the same direction.

= (24.17 + 25.06) / 50.77 x 100= 96.9%

• /

irr i4izjoL.

Inspector / Date:

I I Page t_ of i__

-rv OYr-0(0 -7(03

Item No.. M2.B1.40.0001

-RPVHe--t7R

-1e Weld No.: 2RPV-W08 Scale: 1" 5" Base Metal Coverage -Axial Scans

@ Lifing Lug Surface 1 Total Base Metal coverage with 2 angles from the same direction or 1 angle from opposing directions.

= (8.85 + 10.70) / 50.77 x 100 = 38.5%

450 450 350 Inspector/Date: (AT 11, 10f.

IV Page 34 of __

kn-ALLAPAE'-y- -rr-o.-()

Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 ATTACHMENT C McGuire Unit 2 Examination Data for Weld #2PZR-10, Summary #M2.B3.110.0001

Site/Unit: McGuire 2

Summary No.:

M2.B3.110.0001 Workscope:

ISI UT Vessel Examination Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-640 3

580234 Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-288 Page:

1 of I

Code:

1199812000 A Cat./Item:

B-DlB3.110 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01-015

==

Description:==

Nozzle To Head System ID:

NC Component ID: 2PZR-10 Size/Length:

NIA Thickness/Diameter: 2.550/ 24.500 Limitations:

Yes - See attached Limitation Report

(-MtO g

-A 0.r'- (c. - Zq Start Time:

1050 Finish Time:

1058 Examination Surface:

Lo Location:

Temp. Tool Mfg.:

Cal. Report No.:

Angle Used 0

Scanning dB 39.

Indication(s):

Yes,;

Comments:

FC 06-04 Inside 9.2.3 D.A.S Outside V!

Wo Location:

Serial No.:

Surface Condition: FLUS]

Centerline of Weld MCNDE32819 CAL-06-336 Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Surface Temp.:

82

-F Batch No.:

05125 45 45T 60 60T S Not, Scan Coverage:

Upstream i-Downstream V CW v.

CCW,vl Results:

Accept 1i;,

Reject Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

No 8/15.o

UT Vessel Examination Site/Unit: McGuire I Summary No.:

M2.B Workscope:

2 3.110.0001 ISI Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-820 2

580234 Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-289 Page:

1 of I

Code:

1998/2000 A Cat./Item:

B-D/B3.110 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01-015

==

Description:==

Nozzle To Head System ID:

NC Component ID: 2PZR-10 Size/Length:

NIA Thickness/Diameter: 2.550 1 24.500 Limitations:

Yes-See attached Limitation Report

(-Mo 9*-1z

&C'

,*Qy-c,(, v

)o

)

Start Time:

1115 Finish Time:

1118 Examination Surface:

Inside Outside.'

Surface Condition: FLUSH Lo Location:

9.2.3 Wo Location:

Centerline of Weld Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

05125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

D.A.S Serial No.:

MCNDE32819 Surface Temp.:

82

'F Cal. Report No.:

CAL-06-337 Angle Used 01451 45T 60 60T 36 Scanning dB 57.1 Indication(s):

Yes' No ;v Scan Coverage:

Upstream !%, Downstream v.

CW V CCW A/

Comments:

Results:

Accept iqvl Reject Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

No -I. la

/=

Reviewed Previous Data:

Yes ExaminerLevel 1 Signature Date Reviewer

1. /

5.*

Sinature Date Jones, Russel E.

9123/2006 Jay A Eaton Level 111*

9/2612006 Examiner Level l*N Signature Date Site Review Signature Date Brown, Tho

• J 9/23i2006 NIA Other Level NIA/

Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date NIA Jerome Swan yr!

V All

UT Vessel Ex.amination Site/Unit: McGuire /

Summary No.:

M2.E Workscope:

2 13.110.0001

'SI Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-820 2

580324 Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-290 Page:

1 of 10 Code:

1998/2000 A Cat./Item:

B-DIB3.110 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01-015

==

Description:==

Nozzle To Head System ID:

NC Component ID: 2PZR-10 Size/Length:

NIA Thickness/Diameter: 2.550 124.500 Limitations:

Yes - See attached Limitation Report Start Time:

1119 Finish Time:

1124 Examination Surface:

Inside Outside !V, Surface Condition: FLUSH Lo Location:

9.2.3.

Wo Location:

Centerline of Weld Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

05125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

D.A.S Serial No.:

MCNDE32819 Surface Temp.:

82 oF Cal. Report No.:

CAL-06-338 Angle Used 0

45 45T 60 60T Scanning dB 62.5 62.5 Indication(s):

Yes.

No ivy Scan Coverage:

Upstream v:

Downstream rv; CW 'v" CCW v Comments:

Results:

Accept V' Reject Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

No A,%0/

Reviewed Previous Data:

Yes Examiner Level II Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date o e. u.o.9/23/2006 Jay A Eaton LevelI,,

9/2612006 Examiner Level

-1 Signature Date Site Review I'

Sinaure Date Brown, Thomat5,,

9/2312006 NIA A

Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review Signature

,Date NIA Jerome Swan

/

O:

/

Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head % of Coverage ItemNo.: mz.5-6-110.000r Weld No.:

7Z P~a-z, I Weld Coverage Scan S1 S2 S1 S2 Cw Cw CCw CCw Angle 350 350 450 450 350 450 350 450

% Coverage Obtained 100 72.9 95.5 55.3 100 100 100 100 723.7 Total 723.7 + 8 =

90.5

% Coverage Base Material Coverage S1 &S2 Cw & CCw 350,450&600 450&350 Total 86.9 65.9 152.8 152.8 + 2 =

76.4 76.6

% Coverage

% Coverage 00 Scan Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 0' + 3 81.2

% Coverage Inspector

/ Date: I TLc~

Pagej~of ~Q Inspector / Date :

Page 'Z-of 10 m

I I

I r

Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head Limitations Item No.: M Z.*63. \\\\0. 000 Weld No.:

7_ ?-Z'*- - Io The 350 and 450 scans are limited at 20 Heater Wells on the Surface 1 side. The limitation is 2" at each well for a total of 40". The total weld length is 76". See attached drawings.

% of Weld limited at Heater Wells = 40 / 76 x 100 = 52.6%.

Base Metal coverage from Surface 1 At Heater Wells

= 83.4% coverage for 52.6% of the weld length = 43.9%

Remainder of weld = 90.8% coverage for 47.4% of the weld length = 43.0%

Total Coverage

= 86.9%

Weld coverage from Surface 1 At Heater Wells

= 91.4% coverage for 52.6% of the weld length = 48.1%

Remainder of weld = 100% coverage for 47.4% of the weld length = 47.4%

Total Coverage

= 95.5%

Inspector /.Date:-

Page3 of Page JL of I C,

Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head Total Area Weld & Base Material Total Weld Area= 5.35 sq. in.

Total Area of Base Material -- 6.71 + 6.95 = 13.66 sq. in.

Total Exam Area = 6.71 + 5.35 + 6.95 = 19.01 sq. in.

Item No.: MZ.3

.1. 0001 Weld No.:

ZV_

- t_

I Scale 1" = 2" Surface 2 Nozzle I

Surface 1 - Head Clad Inspector / Date:.1 Page 4 of 1j

=k cilvoloa

Pressurizer Sur e i~ozzle to Head 00 Scan Coverage 0* Scan Total Area = 14.57 sq. in.

Item No. : msz.tS. l\\Q. ooo t Weld No.:

Total 01 Scan Coverage = 14.57 / 19.01 x 100 = 76.6 %

Scale 1" = 2" Surface 2 Nozzle 00 Surface 1 - Head Clad Inspector /Date:

Page s ofj

Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head Base Metal Coverage -Axial (Areas not at Heater Wells)

ItemNo. : m t7,U6o. 0ooo 0 Weld No. :

Z__

Total Coverage with 2 angles from the same direction

=(6.71 + 5.69) / 13.66 x 100 = 90.8%

Scale 1" 2"

Surface 2 Nozzle Surface I -Head 600 Clad Inspector / Date: *--

Page -L of io'

Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head Base Metal Coverage -Axial @ Heater Wells Total Coverage with 2 angles from the same direction or 2 angles from opposite directions = (5.70 + 5.69) / 13.66 x 100 = 83.4%

ItemNo. : M.Z.

.opvI W eld No.:

_-to Scale 1"= 2" Heater Well Surface 2 Nozzle Surface 1 - Head 600 450 Clad

/

350 450 350 Inspector /Date:

0t f1Z

,1f Page -7 of _o

Pressurizer Surge iNozzle to Head Base Metal Coverage - Circumferential ItemNo.: M-L.S3.io-Oool Total Coverage with 350 and 450 CW and CCW

= (6.71 + 2.30) / 13.66 x 100 = 65.9%

Weld No.:

Scale 1" =2" Surface 2 Nozzle 450 and 350 Surface 1 - Head Area 2.30 sq. in.

Clad Inspector / Date :

Page Lof *o

Pressurizer Surme Nozzle to Head Weld Coverage from Surface 2-Axial & Circ. Scans 100% Coverage 350 & 450 Scans CW, CCW Total Weld Coverage 350 from Surface 2 = 3.90 / 5.35 x 100 = 72.9 %

Total Weld Coverage 45-from Surface 2 = 2.96 / 5.35 x 100 = 55.3 %

Item No.:

.I. ooo I Weld No. :

7.**.t Scale 1" = 2" 350 450 I

Surface 2 Nozzle Area=2.96 sq. in.

Surface 1 - Head in.- 35*

Clad

( L 7Wm CjlZ.io(,

Inspector / Date :

Page -

of I'

Pressurizer Suree Niozzle to Head Weld Coverage from Surface 1 -Axial 100% Coverage 350 Axial scan from Surface 1 100% Coverage 45' Axial scan from Surface 1 except at Heater Well Limitation Weld Coverage 45' Axial scan from Surface I

@Heater Well = 4.89 / 5.35 x 100 =91.4 %

Item No. : M7Z.355. 1\\o 000\\

Weld No.:

Z V'i*-

Scale 1" = 2" Heater Well Surface 2 Nozzle 450 350 in. - 451 Surface I - Head Clad Inspector / Date :

• A4z, (aý Page iop of..o

UT Vessel Examination Site/Unit: McGuire /

Summary No.:

M2.B Workscope:

2 3.110.0001 Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-820 2

580234 Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-291 Page:

1 of I

'SI Code:

199812000 A Cat./Item:

B-DIB3.110 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01.015

==

Description:==

Nozzle To Head System ID:

NC Component ID: 2PZR-10.

Size/Length:

N/A Thickness/Diameter: 2.550 24.500 Limitations:

Yes - See attached Limitation Report

(-M n z

-sr-L.

O"1 -

0

,O0 Start Time:

1042 Finish Time:

1048 Examination Surface:

Inside Outside.i, Surface Condition: FLUSH

.(

LoLocation:

9.2.3 Wd Location:

Centerline of Weld Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

05125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

D.A.S Serial No.:

MCNDE32819 Surface Temp.:

82

'F Cal. Report No.:

CAL-06-339 Angle Used 0

45 45T 60 60T Scanning dB 68.9 Indication(s):

Yes..

No v' Scan Coverage:

Upstream Downstream 9:

CW CCW Comments:

Results:

Accept ;v.i Reject Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

No l,%

Reviewed Previous. Data:

Yes I

Examiner Level

,...Signature "Date Reviewer.

,ure "Date Examiner Level II-N Sigazure Date Site Review

!,,Signature

Date, Matteson, Mary F.

9123/2006 NIA Other Level NIA Sinature Date ANII Review S/

signature

/.

Date N/A Jerome Swan

/

Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 ATTACHMENT D McGuire Unit 2 Examination Data for Weld #2PZR-12, Summary #M2.B3.110.0002

UT Vessel Lamination Site/Unit: McGuire I Summary No.:

M2.E Workscope:

2 13.110.0002 Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-640 3

Outage No.:

M2.17 Report No.:

UT-06-283 Page:

1 of I

ISI.

Code:

199812000 A Cat./Item:

B-DIB3.110 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01-015

==

Description:==

NOZZLE to HEAD System ID:

NC Component ID: 2PZR-12 Size/Length:

N/A Thickness/Diameter: 1.900 112.750 Limitations:

Yes - See Limitation Calculations Attached on Report UT-06-281 Start Time:

1503 Finish Time:

1509 Examination Surface:

Inside Outside v Surface Condition: GROUND FLUSH Lo Location:

Stamp #1 Wo Location:

Centerline of Weld Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

05125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

FISHER Serial No.:

MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:

91 OF Cal. Report No.:

CAL-06-333 Angle Used 0

45 45T 60 60T Scanning dB 38.5 Indication(s):

Yes No '

Scan Coverage:

Upstream v:'

Downstream,v!

CW iV CCW ='

Comments:

Results:

Accept -}

Reject Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

No - 81.7%

Reviewed Previous Data:

Yes Examiner Level II-N Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Tucker, David K.

9/18/206Jay A Eaton Level III 913012006 Examiner Leve Signature Date Site Review Signature Date Moss, Gary J.

.911812006 N/A Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review

/Aignature Date N)A Jerome Swan E d 0

4, 4-

bUT Vessel E,.amination Site/Unit: McGuire /

Summary No.:

M2.E

. Workscope:

2 33.110.0002 2 Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-820 2

580233 Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT.06-281 Page:

1 of 7

ISI Code:

199812000 A Cat./Item:

B-D/B3.110 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01-015

==

Description:==

NOZZLE to HEAD System ID:

NC

-Component ID: 2PZR-12 Size/Length:

NIA Thickness/Diameter: 1.900112.750 Limitations:

Yes - See attached Limitation Calculations Start Time:

1540 Finish lime:

1610 Examination Surface:

Inside vX!

Outside Surface Condition: GROUND FLUSH Lo Location:

Stamp #1 Wo Location:

Centerline of Weld Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

05125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

FISHER Serial No.:

MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:

91

• F Cal. Report No.:

CAL-06-331, CAL-06-332 Angle Used 0

45 45T 60 60T 35&35T Scanning dB 70 64 Indication(s):

Yes No,Vi Scan Coverage:

UpstreamV./

Downstream v' CW i' CCW iv Comments:

600 used to obtain additional coverage - scanning towards nozzle.

Results:

Accept i]

Reject Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

No - 81.7%

Reviewed Previous Data:

Yes Examiner Level I1-N Si$'

cgn*L..e, 1 Date Reviewer ture Date Cochran, Lonnie D.

9/18)2006 Jay A Eaton Level III 9130/2006 Examiner Level NIA Signature Date Site Review Signature Date NIA NIA Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review Signature Date NIA Jerome Swan F

/C-U

Pressurizer Surav Nozzle to Head % of Coverap-e Item No.:

M Z.Tý)--S -I to. 000-L Weld No. :

Weld Coverage Scan S1 S2 S1 S2 Cw Cw CCw CCw Angle 350 350 450 450 350 450 350 450

% Coverage Obtained 100 76.1 100 58.9 100 100 100 100 735 Total 735

+8=

91.9

% Coverage Base Material Coverage S1 Cw,& CCw 350,450&600 450&350 Total 90.5 64.5 155 77.5 75.6 155 +2=

% Coverage

% Coverage 00 Scan Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00

• 3 Inspector

/ Date:

Page..Lof ~

81.7

% Coverage Inspector / Date :

Page Z of -7

Pressurizer Spra, Nozzle toead Total Area Weld & Base Material Item No. :

3M:5

• I3

.10c.

(Xc70Z Total Weld Area = 3.48 sq. in.

Weld No. :

zV21z - ýZ Total Area of Base Material = 3.99 + 4.26 = 8.25 sq. in.

Total Exam Area 3.99 + 4.26 + 3.48 = 11.73 sq. in.

Area = 3.48 sq. in.

Scale 1" = 2" Surface 2 Nozzle rea = 4.26 sq. in.

Surface I - Head Area = 3.99 sq. in.

Clad Inspector / Date :

Page.3

/

of_

p0 Pressurizer Spray Nozzle to Head 0' Scan Coverage Item No.:

i13.CQoZ.

Weld No.:

ZYE'Z-I-7 0' Scan Total Area = 8.87 sq. in.

Scale 1" = 2" Total 0' Scan Coverage = 8.87 / 11.73 x 100 = 75.6 %

Surface 2 Nozzle o

Surface I - Head Clad Inspector / Date: i4QLE Page '4 of I

Pressurizer Spray N4ozzle to Head Weld Coverage - Axial & Circumferential'Scans Item No. :

OA-Z. G-5. 110-OOOL 100% Coverage 350 & 450 Scans CW, CCW and Axial from Surface 1 Total Weld Coverage 350 from Surface 2 = 2.65 / 3.48 x 100 = 76.1 %

Total Weld Coverage 45' from Surface 2 = 2.05 / 3.48 x 100 = 58.9 %

Weld No.:

Z FAZ- - 7.-

Scale 1" = 2" Surface 2 Nozzle L-350

.450 Area = 2.05 sq, in. - 450 Surface 1 - Head Clad Inspector/D ate: ( __1

-_Sol_

Page S-of §7..

Pressurizer Spray Aozzle to Head Base Material Coverage -Axial Scans Item No.:

VMZ...tA0.0001 WeidNo.:

ZAE-iL Total Area of Base Material = 3.99 + 3.48 = 7.47 sq. in.

Total Base Material Coverage = 7.47 / 8.25 x 100 = 90.5 %

Area = 3.99 sq. in.

Clad Scale 1" = 2" Surface 2 Nozzle 450 600 Inspector / Date:

,i, Page -( of -7

Pressurizer Spray NLozzle to Head Base Material Coverage - Circumferential Scans Item No.:

vIt.135."63 MoO06 Total Area of Base Material = 3.99 + 1.33 = 5.32 sq. in Total Base Material Coverage = 5.32 / 8.25 x 100 = 64.5 %

Weld No. :

Scale I"= 2 Surface 2 Nozzle 450 350 Surface 1 - Head Area = 3.99 sq. in.

Clad Inspector / Date:

Page -7

_1 IL 1-

UT Vessel Er-amination Site/Unit: McGuire i Summary No.:

M2.E Workscope:

2 p3.110.0002 ISI Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-820 2

580233 Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-285 Page:

1 of 4

Code:

1998/2000 A Cat./item:

BwDlB3.110 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01-015

==

Description:==

NOZZLE to HEAD System ID:

NC Component ID: 2PZR-12 Size/Length:

N/A Thickness/Diameter: 1.900112.750 Limitations:

Yes - See Limitation Calculations Attached on Report UT-06-281 Start Time:

1518 Finish Time:

1535 Examination Surface:

Inside Outside v.

Surface Condition: GROUND FLUSH Lo Location:

Stamp #1 Wo Location:

Centerline of Weld Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

05125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

FISHER Serial No.:

MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:

91

-F Cat. Report No.:

CAL-06-334 Angle Used 0145 45T 60 60T Scanning dB 65.0 65.0 Indication(s):

Yes iLi No,..

Scan Coverage:

Upstream v; Downstream i CW iv CCW i-Comments:

See Report No. UT-06-350 for through wall and length sizing information.

Results:

Accept Ie" Reject Info Reference PIP No. M-06-03968 Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

No - 81.7%

Reviewed Previous Data:

Yes Examiner Level Il-N

.'t" re Date Reviewer I

-ignature Date Tucker, David K.

.9118/2006 Jay A Eaton Level II9/30/2006 Examiner Leve

//,,

Signature Date Site:Review Signature Date Moss, Gary J.

9/18/2006 N/A Other Level NiA'7

/

Signature Date ANII Review gnature

/

/

Date NIA

(

Jerome Swan rAt b7 r'

1 AN

Site/Unit:

Summary No.:

Workscope:

Ultrasonic Inuication Report McGuire

/

2 M2.B3.110.0002 ISI

. Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-820 2

580233 Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-285 Page:

2 of 4

Search Unit Angle:

45 Wo Location:

Weld Centerline Lo Location:

See Remarks 0

Piping Welds Ferritic Vessels

> 2"T Other wo waux CL 1W111 W2 MP Metal Path Wmax Distance From;Wo To S.U. At Maximum Response RBR Remaining Back Reflection W1 Distance From Wo At Of Max (Forward)

L Distance From Datum W2 Distance From Wo At Of Max (Forward)

Comments:

See Report No. UT-06-350 for through wall and length sizing information.

ft iXi D-A-TUM ITZ Scan Indication W

Forward Backward Li L

L2 RBR Remarks No.

Of Max Of Max Of Max Of Max Of Amp.

DAC W

MP Wl MP W2 MP Max Max 1

133 2.75 4.30 N/A NIA N/A N/A

-1.25

-0.9 0.0 NIA L Dim's from Stamp #1. Eval from ref sensitivity of 57 dB.

2 28

-0.38 3.20 N/A N/A N/A N/A

-1.8

-1.4 0.8 N/A L Dim's from Stamp #3 Examiner Level Il-N Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Tucker, DavidK.

9/18/2006 Jay A Eaton Level 1I 9/30/2006

'Examiner Level IISignature

-Date Site Review Signature Date Moss, Gary J.

9118/2006 N/A Other Level N/A

-g.gnature Date ANII Review,")

Signature Date NOA Jerome Swan

(

i,.

/

sga x17 C

3 G' 1

01 C

/

I

Suppleme,.A Report Report No.:

Summary No.: M2.B3.110.O002 Examiner: Tucker, David K Examiner: Moss, Gary J.

-J&a/

A

=

Other:

WA Level:

il-N Level:

if Level:

NIA Page:

Reviewer: Jay A Eaton Level liI Site Review: N/A ANII Review: Jerome Swan UT-u6-285 3

of 4

Date: 9/30/2006 Date:

Date:~

Comments:

Reflector #1 is an Indication in. the nozzle forging. It is located at the edge of the inspection area and has no recordable through wall dimension.

7/

-p

'5 0 tZPAC C.1, 7

7

Suppleme,.. a l, Report Report Nc3.:

UT-06-285 e:

4 of 4

Summary No.: M2.83.110.0002 Examiner: Tucker, David K. ~

Examiner: Moss, Gary J.

.2L-.,

Other: N/A Level:

II-N Level:

II Level:

N/A Reviewer: Jay A Eaton Level Ill Site Review: N/A ANII Review: Jerome Swan Pag Date: 9130/2006 Date:

Date: /

-i ia Comments:

Reflector #2 Is an indication contained entirely in the ID cladding. Only indications extending from the cladding into the carbon steel weld or base metal are concidered to be relevent.

CIE Z.

4* 2-7 7

7 16u9PA~CC A'

1-7 7.

C(,AV,-'-"

,zyv\\ ':

UT Vessel E..amination

~kJ~

Site/Unit: McGuire /

Summary No.:

M2.E Workscope:

2 33.1110.0002 IS' Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

PDI-UT-7 F

580233 Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-350 Page:

1 of 2

Code:

1998/2000 A Cat./Item:

B-D183.110 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01-015

==

Description:==

NOZZLE to HEAD System ID:

NC Component ID: 2PZR-12 Size/Length:

NIA ThicknesslDiameter: 1.900 112.750 Limitations:

None Start Time:

2110 Finish Time:

2300 Examination Surface:

Inside Outside ýer Surface Condition: AS GROUND Lo Location:

See Comments **

Wo Location:

Centerline of Weld Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

05125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

FISHER Serial No.:

MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:

91

°F Cal. Report No.:

CAL-06-366 Angle Used 0

45 45T 60 60T Scanning dB Indication(s):

Yes 4v No:

Scan Coverage:

Upstream -

Downstream V; CW1 CCW:

Comments:

• Adjusted dB as necessary to sizeindications. Sizing data for reflectors documented on report UT-06-285 page 2 of 4.

Lo location taken from stamps: Ind. #1 used Stamp #1, Ind. #2 used Stamp #3 Results:

Accept i*J Reject Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

NIA Reviewed Previous Data:

Yes Examiner Level II-N t_.1"

.Signature "Date Reviewer SintreDt Brown, Thomas

'**"*'ia*9/1812006 Jay AEaton Levelll "1igatr 9/30/2006 Examiner Level II-N

/itaueDate Site Review Sintr Date Cochran, Lonnie 0.

911812006 NIA A**.

t Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review Signature

/

Date NIA Jerome Swan

/-,

//-fc4.

I

/¢ I

I

, "q_-p Ultrasonic Indici.

,in Sizing Report Site/Unit:

McGuire /

2 Summary No.:

M2.B3.110.0002 Workscope:

ISI Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

PDI-UT-7 F

580233 Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-350 Page:

2 of 2

Item Identification:

Reflectors # 1 & 2 Lo Location:

See Remarks**

Start Time:

21:10 Weld Crown Width:

2.0" Measured Component Thickness:

2.8" Wo Location:

Weld Centerline Finish Time:

23:00 Ind Angle dB OD Length Remaining Thru ntermittent o(

Recommendadtions or Remarks Used or No.

Used Technique Ligament Wall Continuous Useful Used Li L2 jTotal 1

1 45 A.A.T.

0.0

-1.8 1.8" 2.8"

.10 Continuous Tip depth = 2.8" Base Depth 2.9" 2

45 A.A.T.

-0.9

-1.5 0.6" 2.2" 0

Continuous Actual tip depth = 2.15" Actual base depth 2.21 Above depths both round to 2.2 which = 0 T.W.

Additional Remarks:

Adjusted dB as needed to size indications. Lo location taken from stamps: Indication #1 used stamp #1, Indication #2 used-stamp #3.

Examiner Level II-N S.. nature Date Reviewer Signature Date Brown, Thomas D

9/18/2006 Jay A Eaton Level III 9/30/2006 Examiner Level Il-N

,Sigrturý,

Date Site Review Signature Date Cochran, Lonnie D.

.9/18/2006 N/A Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review

/

Signature Date W/A Jerome Swan

_0 I

1,1

Relief Request Serial #08-MN-001 ATTACHMENT E McGuire Unit 2 Examination Data for Weld #2PZR-16, Summary #M2.B3.110.0006

UT Vessel Eramination Site/Unit: McGuire I Summary No.:

M2.8 Workscope:

2 3.110.0006 ISI Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-640 3

Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-284 Page:

1 of 1

Code:

199812000 A Cat.Item:

B-DIB3.110 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01-015

==

Description:==

NOZZLE to HEAD System ID:

NC Component ID: 2PZR-16 Size/Length:

NIA Thickness/Diameter: 1.900 115.000 Limitations:

Yes - See Limitation Calculations on Report No. UT-06-282 Start Time:

1455 Finish Time:

1503 Examination Surface:

Inside Outside vf.

Surface Condition: GROUND FLUSH Lo Location:

9.2.3 Wo Location:

Centerline of Weld Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

05125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

FISHER Serial No.:

MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:

91 oF Cal. Report No.:

CAL-06-333 Angle Used 0

45 45T 60 60T Scanning dB 38.5 Indication(s):

Yes:

No iv Scan Coverage:

Upstream v1 Downstream v!

CW v:

CCW,

Comments:

Results:

Accept iA Reject Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

No - 81.2%

Reviewed Previous Data:

Yes Examiner Level II-N Si n Date Reviewer nature Date Tucker, David K.

9/18/2006 Jay A Eaton Level Ill

(-

lk 9130/2006 Examiner Level I

Signature Date Site Review Signature Date Moss, Gary J.

Y 9/18/2006 N/A A

Other Level N/A Signature Date ANII Review J

m

,/-..

Signature

Date, NIA Jerome Swan X

0

/

• /

UT Vessel Eramination Site/Unit: McGuire /

Summary No.:

M2.E Workscope:

2 13.110.0006 ISI Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-820 2

580233 Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-282 Page:

1 of 7

Code:

1998/2000 A Cat./Item:

1-DIB3.110 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01-015

==

Description:==

NOZZLE to HEAD System ID:

NC Component ID: 2PZR-16 Size/Length:

N/A Thickness/Diameter: 1.900 /15.000 Limitations:

Yes - See attached Limitation Calculations Start Time:

1540 Finish Time:

1610 Examination Surface:

Inside Li Outside Surface Condition: GROUND FLUSH Lo Location:

9.2.3 Wo Location:

Centerline of Weld Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

05125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

FISHER Serial No.:

MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:

91

-F Cal. Report No.:

CAL-06-331, CAL-06-332 Angle Used.

0 45 45T 60 60T 35&35T1 Scanning dB 70 64 Indication(s):

Yes No.,V.

Scan Coverage:

Upstream iv' Downstream :V CW v'.

CCW'f Comments:

60* used to obtain additional coverage - scanning towards nozzle Results:

Accept vtI Reject Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

No - 81.2%

Reviewed Previous Data:

Yes Examiner Level II-N

,Sg ture Date Reviewer Signature Date Cochran, Lonnie D.

9/18/2006 Jay A Eaton Level III 9/30/2006 Examiner Level NIA Signature Date Site Review Signature Date N/A NIA Other Level NIA Signature Date ANII Review Signature

/

Date 3 NIA Jerome Swan j

}.--

,/0 /./

(,

Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Head % of Coverai~e Item No.:

M7 Weld No.:

z zEtO Weld Coverage Scan S1 S2 SI S2 Cw Cw CCw CCw Angle 350 350 450 450 350 450 350 450

% Coverage Obtained 100 82.4 100 61.4 100 100 100 100 743.8 Total 743.8 ÷8 =

93.0

% Coverage Base Material Coverage S1 Cw & CCw 350,450&600 45o&350 Total 89.3 63.1 152.4 76.2 74.3 152.4 -2=

% Coverage

% Coverage 0' Scan Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00 - 3 a I i

-3iý 81.2

% Coverage Page Z of-1 Inspector / Date :

Pressurizer Safety Rt ief Nozzle to Head Total Area Weld & Base Material Item No. :

I..SS I 1 D. EcL9,P2 Weld No.: --

VP-Z-'Z Total Weld Area 3.29 sq. in.

Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 3.87 7.46 sq. in.

Total Exam Area = 3.59 + 3.29 + 3.87 = 10.75 sq. in.

Surface 2 Nozzle Area = 3.29 sq. in.

Area = 3.87 sq. in.

Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date :

Page 3 of Clad

Pressurizer Safety / Retief Nozzle to Head 00 Scan Coverage Item No. :

-. 0.

Weld No.:

c*.3*4*ol, 00 Scan Total Area = 7.99 sq. in.

Total 00 Scan Coverage = 7.99 / 10.75 x 100 = 74.3 %

Surface 2 Nozzle O

0 Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date :

Page _L of

~A~k d

Clad

Pressurizer Safety I Rudef Nozzle to Head Weld Coverage - Axial & Circumferential Scans Item No.:

Y Z_.'.

.c~o(,

WeldNo.:

ZZA2-1 100% Coverage 350 & 450. Scans CW, CCW ans Axial from Surface 1 Total Weld Coverage 35' from Surface 2 = 2.71 / 3.29 x 100 = 82.4%

Total Weld Coverage 450 from Surface 2 = 2.02 / 3.29 x 100 = 61.4%

Surface 2 Nozzle Area 450 = 2.02 sq. in.

Scale 1" = 2" Inspector / Date:

-____o'o Page 5-of -7

Pressurizer Safety/ Rt..ief Nozzle to Head Base Material Coverage -Axial Scans A

J Item No.:

v'4ZA~.

WýS--110o(0 Weld No.:

Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 3.07 = 6.66 sq. in.

Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 6.66 / 7.46 x 100 = 89.3 %

Surface 2 Nozzle Area = 3.59 sq. in.

Inspector Date:

Page -(o of Scale 1" = 2" Clad

Pressurizer Safety/ Rtief Nozzle to Head Base Material Coverage - Circumferential Scans ItemNo.:

W2T_.11O..o0C, Weld No. :

Z 1 1r?,-(I Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 1.12 = 4.71 sq. in.

Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 4,71 17.46 x 100 = 63.1 %

Surface 2 Nozzle 450 & 350 Inspector / Date:

T,

3 Page --I of -7 Scale 1",= 2" Clad

amý Y.

UT Vessel E^admination Site/Unit: McGuire /

Summary No.:

M2.8 Workscope:

2 13.110.0006 Procedure:

Procedure Rev.:

Work Order No.:

NDE-820 2

580233 Outage No.:

M2-17 Report No.:

UT-06-286 Page:

1 of 1

ISI Code:

199812000 A Cat./Item:

B-DIB3.110 Location:

Drawing No.:

MCM 2201.01-015

==

Description:==

NOZZLE to HEAD System ID:

NC Component ID: 2PZR.16 Size/Length:

NIA Thickness/Diameter: 1.900 115.000 Limitations:

Yes - See Limitation Calculations on Report No. UT-06-282 Start Time:

1510 Finish Time:

1518 Examination Surface:

Inside Outside v, Surface Condition: GROUND FLUSH Lo Location:

9.2.3 Wo Location:

Centerline of Weld Couplant:

ULTRAGEL II Batch No.:

05125 Temp. Tool Mfg.:

FISHER Serial No.:

MCNDE 27218 Surface Temp.:

91

-F Cal. Report No.:

CAL-06-334 Angle Used 0

45 45T 60 60T Scanning dB 65.0 65.0 Indication(s):

Yes No l.v!

Scan Coverage:

Upstream :v Downstream 4i CW ;v CCW 14 Comments:

Results:

Accept ;iý Reject Info Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%:

No - 81.2%

Reviewed Previous Data:

Yes Examiner Level II.N

.4, 7*_

Signature Date Reviewer

ýature Date Tucker, David K.

91/06JV~tnLvl

/020 Exmnr Lvlintr aeSite Review

/

Signature Date Moss, Gary J.

l.

• .9/18/2006 NIA Other Level N/A y

Signature Date ANIW Review Signature Date

-NIA Jerome swan

/

/L ý I

(Z-

/

f.