ML080510471

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RAI, Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request for Containment Recirculation Pumps
ML080510471
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/21/2008
From: Boska J
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLI-1
To:
Entergy Nuclear Operations
Boska J, NRR, 301-415-2901
References
TAC MD7517
Download: ML080510471 (5)


Text

February 21, 2008 Vice President, Operations Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249

SUBJECT:

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING RELIEF REQUEST FOR CONTAINMENT RECIRCULATION PUMPS (TAC NO. MD7517)

Dear Sir or Madam:

On December 18, 2007, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy), submitted an application for a relief request for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 2 (IP2) which would allow testing of the containment recirculation pumps at a lower flow rate than that specified by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants, 2001 Edition through 2003 Addenda.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is needed to complete its review. The specific questions are found in the enclosed request for additional information (RAI). Please provide a response within 30 days of the date of this letter.

Please contact me at (301) 415-2901 if you have any questions on this issue.

Sincerely,

/ra/

John P. Boska, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-247

Enclosure:

RAI cc w/encl: See next page

ML080510471

  • See memo dated 2/7/08 OFFICE LPL1-1/PM LPL1-1/LA CPTB/BC LPL1-1/BC NAME JBoska SLittle JMcHale*

MKowal DATE 2/20/08 2/21/08 2/7/08 2/21/08

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 2 cc:

Senior Vice President Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Vice President Oversight Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Senior Manager, Nuclear Safety & Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 Senior Vice President and COO Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Assistant General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Manager, Licensing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Mr. Paul Tonko President and CEO New York State Energy, Research, and Development Authority 17 Columbia Circle Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. John P. Spath New York State Energy, Research, and Development Authority 17 Columbia Circle Albany, NY 12203-6399 Mr. Paul Eddy New York State Department of Public Service 3 Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12223-1350 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Senior Resident Inspector=s Office Indian Point 2 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 59 Buchanan, NY 10511 Senior Resident Inspector=s Office Indian Point 3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 59 Buchanan, NY 10511 Mr. Charles Donaldson, Esquire Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Law 120 Broadway New York, NY 10271 Mr. Raymond L. Albanese Four County Coordinator 200 Bradhurst Avenue Unit 4 Westchester County Hawthorne, NY 10532 Mayor, Village of Buchanan 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511 Mr. William DiProfio PWR SRC Consultant 48 Bear Hill Road Newton, NH 03858 Mr. Garry Randolph PWR SRC Consultant 1750 Ben Franklin Drive, 7E Sarasota, FL 34236

Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 2 cc:

Mr. William T. Russell PWR SRC Consultant 400 Plantation Lane Stevensville, MD 21666-3232 Mr. Jim Riccio Greenpeace 702 H Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 Mr. Phillip Musegaas Riverkeeper, Inc.

828 South Broadway Tarrytown, NY 10591 Mr. Mark Jacobs IPSEC 46 Highland Drive Garrison, NY 10524 Mr. Sherwood Martinelli FUSE USA via email

Enclosure REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELIEF REQUEST FOR THE FOURTH 10-YEAR PUMP AND VALVE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-247 In a letter dated December 18, 2007, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML073620369, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy), submitted an application for relief request P-1 for the fourth 10-year interval inservice testing program at Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 2 (IP2). This relief would allow testing of the containment recirculation pumps at a lower flow rate than that specified by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants, 2001 Edition through 2003 Addenda. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is reviewing the submittal and has the following questions:

RAI P-1-01 Per Section 5.10 of NUREG-1482, Rev. 1, Guidelines for Inservice Testing at Nuclear Power Plants, please provide the following for each containment recirculation pump (21RP and 22RP):

(a) The estimated cost of any temporary or permanent system modification required to enable a comprehensive pump test (CPT) to be performed at +/-20 percent of pump design flow, along with any difficulty associated with implementing the modification.

(b) Provide all details (e.g., temporary modifications of piping, containment sump, etc.),

including pump performance curves, if a full-flow test was performed during preservice or service of the plant.

(c) The pump performance curve was submitted with the relief request. Provide any other data associated with the pumps shop testing provided by the manufacturer.

(d) Provide the records and history of maintenance and repairs performed on each pump.

RAI-P-1-02 Provide justification that pump degradation can be adequately assessed at the proposed CPT flow rate.

RAI-P-1-03 Provide information to show that the pumps will not be adversely affected by operating at the proposed CPT flow rate.