ML072960127
| ML072960127 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 07/17/2007 |
| From: | Florida Power & Light Energy Seabrook |
| To: | NRC Region 1 |
| Caruso J | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML062050109 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-443/07-301 | |
| Download: ML072960127 (31) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1
- acility: S&y3Ao.K Date of Examination: 7/4 -&
)eveloped by: Written -Facility @ NRC 9 / I Operating - Facility,@ NRC [7 Target Date'
-180 1.
Task Description (Reference)
Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)
I Examiner's Chief Initials I
-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) %
-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 1-901 [5. Reference material due (C.l .e; C.3.c; Attachment 211
(-75) 6. Intearated examination outline(s)~ ,due.
~ , . includina Forms ES-201-2.S-201-3.'
ES-jOlIi, ES301-2, ES-301.5, ES-D-l's~ES-401-1/2,ES40i-3. and I I ES-4014. as applicable (C.7.e and f: C.3.d)
(7. Examinationoutline(?.) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e))
- 8. ProDosed examinations fincludino written. walk-throuoh JPMs. and scenarios. as applicablej. suppo&ng documentation Gncludmg Forms I - 1 I ES-301-3. ES-301-4. ES-301.5, ES-301-6. and ES-401-6. and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.l e. f. q and h. C 3 d)
-30 9 Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C 1 I, C 2 g, ES-202) I h 1
-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-2014 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202)
-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.9 Y
-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.J: C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
$4.
-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
-7 14: Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >IO) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters Sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202. C.2.e; ES-204)
-7 15. Proctonnglwittenexam administration guidelines reviewed wlth facility licensee (C.3 k)
-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distrrboted to NRC examlners (C.3.i)
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the exarninakbn date identified in the corporale notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-I case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201, Page 24 of 27
Item Task Description a b' c#
- 1. a. Verify thatthe outline(s) fit@) the appropriate model, in accordance with W
R I
T T
E N
. b. A~~~~~ whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance 4
with Section D.I of ~ ~ - 4 and 0 1 whether all KIA categories are aPPrOPrlatelY sampled.
whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
- d. A~~~~~ whether thejustifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
2, a, usingF~~~ ES-301-5, that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of evolutions, instrument and component failures. technical SPeclficatlons, S and major transients.
I M
U L
A T
0 R
- b. A~~~~~ whetherthereare enough scenario sets (and spares) to test projected number and mix of applicantsinaccordance with the expected crew composltlon and rotation schedule withoutcompromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested usingatleastone new or significantly modifled scenario, that no Scenarios are duplicated from the applicants= audit test@), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. v
=. T~ the extentpossible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) wit? the qualptive and quantitative criteria specifled on Form ES-301-4 and described In Appendix D.
- 3. a. veriw that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
W (1) the outline(s) the required number of control room and in-Plant tasks I (2) distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form T (3) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified On
( 5 ) the of alternate path, low-power. emergency. and RCAtasks meet the (6) criteria on the form.
- b. verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form 1
W c. Determine ifthere are enough different outlines t o test the projected number and mix I of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
T (cont.)
- 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered I I in the appropriate exam sections.
G E
N E
R A
L
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55,41143and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
- c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5 I .
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. h$#Lret
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. P
- f. Assess whether the exay fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). ENL P Date
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column Ace; chief examiner concurrence required.
2
01 w m
m
\ a PI m
a' ATACHMENT 3 Form ES-2103, Examination Security Agreement r-m..
!4
- w Page 9 of 9
ES-301,Rev. 9 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 I Facility: <&dnmD/L- Date of Examination: ~ / Y J o Operatin
~ 'est Number:
I Initials I 1. General Criteria The operat ng test conforms w th tne previous y appmveo OLtline: cnanges are consistent wth samp ng reqL rements (e g , 10 CFR 55 45, operationa Importance. safety function a str out on)
~ 0.
Tnere $ 6 no day-to-day repetit.on between tnis and other operat ng tests to be adm nistered I omng th s examinat on.
C. Tne operat ng tesl shall not dLplicate tems from me applicants = aLdit tesl(s) (see SectonD.1 a )
0 Overlap +itn the wnrten exam nation and oerween differell parts of the operating tesl $5w t h n acceolab e limits.
- e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria
- a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
$. initial conditions
$. initiating cues
~
$. references and tools. including associated procedures
! 5.
reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee
~ 5. operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
B. detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature B. system response and other examiner cues B. statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- 8. criteria for successful completion of the task B. identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards B. restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use. repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
Date
- a. Author &,,M.
- b. Facility Reviewer(^) -/fir t,)fc,
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 3;.&,
- d. NRC Supervisor /&&#d I NOTE:
- The facilitv siqnature is not applicable for NRC-developedtests.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: ?&&%%QbIL Date of Exam' Scenario Numbers:A I 4 in Operating Test No.:
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES c nilials F
~
- 1. The nmal wndit'ons are rea SI c, in thal some eqdlpment andlor mstrurneniat on may be OJI of service, bLt Iooes not cJe me operators into expected events. .%
2 Tne scenanos cons st mostly of related evenls *A
- 3. Eacn event description consists of 12 Each applicant will De s gn ficantly nvo vea In Ine m nimLm ndmber of trans en15 and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (sJbm.1 the form H In me SlmL alor scenanos]
ES-301, Rev. 9 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 QUALITATIVE AlTRIBUTES Initials a b' c#
1.
2.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be Out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
rc-?
4 No mare than one non-mecnan stic fa lure (e g , pipe DreAK) s incorporated into the scenano w l n o J a credib e precea ng nc dent sdch as a seismic event
Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 ES-301, Rev. 9 SRO-I1 Andrew Caramihalis
-- E Date of Exam: 719-7/12/07 Scenarios Operating Test No.:
V E
N T
T Y
P E -
4 M 1 2 3 I
Scenario 1 (A) Scenario 2 (B) Scenario 4 (D) N I
M U
CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION B S A B O R T O P O C P
- I 0 ix 7 :v#1 RO-I RO-U VOR I iv#l I/C 1 id2
.v#3 iw iv#5 MAJ 1 iv#5 TS 0
RO SRO-I SRO-U RO SRO-I SRO-U RO SRO-l SRO-U lnstructior
- 1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
?. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. () Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
I. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimu1 requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 SRO-12 Edward Lyons acilitv: Seabrook Date of Exam: 7/9-7/12/07 Operating Test No.:
A E Scenarios P V P E L N I T C
A T N Y T P E -
t 1 2 3 4 M Scenario 2 (8) I Scenario 1 (A) Scenario 4 (D)
N I
M U
M(^)
CREW POSITION
- REW POSITION :REW POSITION CREW POSITION I A B S T O R C P O
.O u( 2 2 Ev# iv#l RO-I 1 iv#5
,RO-U Ev#
2 4OR 1 1 Ev# Fv#l 1
IC 4 1 Ev# :v#4 2
EV#
3 Ev#
4 Ev#
5 MAJ 1 1 Ev# EM7 5
rs 0 0
)
!O-I
!O-u
)
- 0-I
- o-u
)
- o-I
- o-u 1 1 1 4 4 2 2 2 1 0 2 2 tructioi Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-I event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component ( K ) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. () Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-I basis Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimun requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 SRO-13 Ed Pigott acility: Seabrook A E Date of Exam: 7/9-7/12/07 Scenarios Operating Test No.:
P V P E L N I T C
A T N Y T P E
1 2 3 4 M
Scenario 1 (A: Scenario 2 (6) Scenario 4 (D) I N
I M
U CREV M(')
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION POSIT11 I A S A B S A T R T O R T B
O S
R A
T B
O I
C o c P O C P O C P 3 X 3 2 2 to4 Ev#l Ev#l Ev#l E* Ed5 Ev#2 to-u
- -EM5 OR 1 1 1 Ev#l Ev#l Ev#l 3 1 4 EM3 E* EM2 E* Ev#3 E M
- - EM5 AAJ 1 1 2 Ev#5 3 7 Ev#4
- - EM5 S
0 3 3 3 Ev#l Ed2
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the 'at-the-controls (ATCY and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, includingat least two instrument or component (IC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (') Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a I-for-1 basis.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimun requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 SRO-14 Eric Mallett cility: I )rook Date of Exam: 719-7/12\07 Operating Test No.:
- =
Scenarios A E P V P E L N I T C
A T N Y P
T E
4
- M 1 2 3 I
Scenario 1 (A) Scenario 4 (D) Scenario 2 (B)
N I
M U
M(")
CREW :REW POSITION :REW POSITION :REW POSITION I POSlTlC S
R A
T I
o c
- - I 1 3 X 2 e Ev#
10-1 1
io-u Ev#
2 __
1 1 OR 1 Ev#
1 4 4 C 4 Ev#
2 E*
3 E*
4 Ev#
5 --
2 2 AAJ 1 Ev#
5 _-
0 2
-S 0
.O RO-I RO-U
.O RO-I RO-U 0
RO-I RO-U istructions:
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the '"at-the-controls(ATC)"
and 'balanceaf-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (') Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimun requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301,Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 SRO-15 Bonnie Bryant acilitv: Seabrook Date of Exam: 7/9-7/12/07 Operating Test No,:
~
A Scenarios P
P L
I C
A N
T 1 2 M
Scenario 1 (A) Scenario 2 (6) Scenario 4 (D) I N
I M
U I MU CREW I CREW POSITIOP I S A B S A B R T O R T O o c P O C P 3
2 304 Ev#l Ev#2 io-u 1
Ev#l 4
Ev #4 Ev#5 3
Ed1 I
30 R
jR0-I jRO-U 10 jR0-I SRO-U 30 B
SRO-I SRO-U nst ructions :
I. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. r) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-I basis,
- 1. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 RO John Burnett acility: Seabrook Date of Exam: 719-7/12/07 - Test No.:
Operatinq A E Scenarios P V P E L N I T C
A T N Y T P E
1 2 3 4 M Scenario 1 (A) Scenario 2 (B) Scenario 4 (D) I N
I M
U M(*)
CREW POSITION 1 CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITIOh I I I A B T O C P
- - _U
- 0 u( 1 0 RO-I RO-U
.]OR 1 1 C
4 2 AAJ 2 1 S
2 2
1 0 1 1 4 2 2 1 2 2 1 0
_1 _1 4 2 2 1 2 2 1 0
_1 _1
_4 _2 2 1 2 2 Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (') Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimui requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
I
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5
- SRO-U1 Shawn Miller acility: ! abrook Date of Exam: 7/9-7/12/07 Operating Test No :
A E l Scenarios P
P L
I C
A N
T 1 2 3 4 M Scenario 1 (A) Scenario 2 (B) I N
I M
U M(')
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION I
0 RO-I RO-U
- 0 RO-I RO-U
- 0 U
RO-I RO-U
- 0 RO-I RO-U istructions:
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type: TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. () Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimun requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 ES-301, Rev. 9
- ility: Seabrook A E Date of Exam: 7/9-7/12/07 Scenarios Operating Test No.:
P V P E L N I T C
A T N Y P
T E
M 1 2 3 I
jcenario 1 (A) Scenario 2 (B) N I
M U
I M(')
CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION I S
R 3
POSITION A
T c
B i(
- I x I 3 u( 3 2 n Ev#l 10-1 Ed5
?O-u
.]OR 1 Ev#l
/C 4 Ed2 Ev#3 Ev#4 Ed6 MAJ 2 Ev#5 Ev#7 TS 2 Ed2 Ev#3
RO SRO-l SRO-U 30 R
SRO-I SRO-U 10 B
jR0-I SRO-U nstructiol I. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the 'at-the-controls (ATC)"
and '"balance-of-plant(BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimun requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 SRO-U3 Mark Hansen
'acilitv: Seabrook A
E Date of Exam: 7/9-7/12/07 Scenarios Operating Test No.:
P V P E L N I T C
A T N Y T P E
1 2 3 4 M Scenario 1 (A) Scenario 2 (6) I N
I M
U M(')
CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION POSITION I S A R T o c 0 X RO-I RO-U 3R d
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the 'at-the-controls (ATCy' and '"balance-of-plant(BOP)" positions: Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrumentor component (UC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlledabnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (+) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-I basis.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicanfs competence count toward the minimun requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6
- acility:Seabrook Station Date of Examination:7/10/7 Operating Test No.:
APPLICANTS John Burnett Andy Edward Edward RO Caramihalis Lyons Pigott SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO-4 nterpretIDiagnose 2.
Events and Conditions 3, 4,
5
- omply With and 2, Jse Procedures (1) 3, 4,
-5 lperate Control NI 3oards (2) -
A 2ommunicate 2.
and Interact 3, 4.
-5 lemonstrate Supervisory 2, Ibility (3) 3, 4.
-5 2omply With and 1.
Jse Tech. Specs. (3) 2 dotes:
- 1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
- 2) Optional for an SRO-U.
- 3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicantslicense type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6
~ ~ ~~~
Faci1ity:Seabrook Station b a t e b f Examination:~lO/7 Operating Test N o 1 1
~ ~~
I 1)
APPLICANTS 1 1) 1 Eric Mallett Bonnie Shawn Miller
--- .. Sean Doody Competencies 1
InterpretlDiagnose 2.3.
Events and Conditions 4,5 Comply With and 2.3, Use Procedures (1) 4.5 Operate Control NIA Boards (2)
Communicate 2.3.
and Interact 4.5 Demonstrate Supervisory 2.3.
4bility (3) 4.5 Comply With and 2.3.
Use Tech. Specs. (3) 4 Votes:
- I) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO
- 2) Optional for an SRO-U.
- 3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicantslicense type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6
~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Faci1ity:Seabrook Station Date of Exarnination:7/10/7 Operating Test No.:
SCE 4RIO 5 SCENAR 4 1 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO, (2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicantslicense type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
- ~ ~
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination st Form FS-401-6 I. Questions and answera are technlceily accurate and applicable to the facility.
- 2. a. NRC K/As ere referenced for all questions.
- b. Facility learnlng obJeeUvesare referenced as available.
- 4. The sampling proceas was random and syatematlc (if more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program ace).
- 5. Question dupllcatlon from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as Indicated below (check the Item that applies) end appears appropriate:
X t h e audlt exam was systematically and randomly developed, or
-the audlt exam wes completed before the licenee exam was started, M
-the examinations were developed independently. or X t h e licensee certifies that there is no duplication. or
-other (explain)
- 6. Bank use meeta limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SROonly questJon distributlon(s) at right 3% I p-%
I , I
- 7. Between SO and 60 percent of the questions Memory CIA on the RO exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KlAa support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO ISRO question distribution(s) at right B/. I qxo I
- 8. Referencedhandouta provided do not give away answera or eM in t h elimlnation of distractom.
- 9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and Is appropriate for the tier to whlch they are assigned; davlatlons are lusUHed.
IO. Question psychometric quality end format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix E.
- 11. The exam contains the required number of onspoint, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet ,
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (7
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor
INote:
- The facility reviewer-s initlaidsignatureare not applicablefor NRCdeveioped examinations.
I indenendent NRC reviewer inltlal items in Column Ace: chief examiner concurrence rewired. l
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: Date of Exam: Exam Level: R O W S R O Q
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 5 of 5